HAYNESVILLE Regional Field Study

Similar documents
STACK/STACK EXTENSION MERAMEC /OSAGE/ WOODFORD STUDY

EAGLE FORD Regional Field Study

SCOOP Woodford. Regional Field Study

UTICA Regional Field Study

A Case Study into the Successful Evaluation and Completion Nonconventional. Jorge Viamontes, PhD VP Reservoir Intelligence, NUTECH

Hostile downhole conditions present complex challenges

Exploration / Appraisal of Shales. Petrophysics Technical Manager Unconventional Resources

Optimising Resource Plays An integrated GeoPrediction Approach

NORTH AMERICAN ANALOGUES AND STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS IN DEVELOPING SHALE GAS PLAYS IN EUROPE Unconventional Gas Shale in Poland: A Look at the Science

Geophysical model response in a shale gas

Keys to Successful Multi-Fractured Horizontal Wells In Tight and Unconventional Reservoirs

Optimizing Vaca Muerta Development

Training Venue and Dates Ref # Reservoir Geophysics October, 2019 $ 6,500 London

and a contribution from Offshore Europe

Correlation of brittleness index with fractures and microstructure in the Barnett Shale

Stochastic Modeling & Petrophysical Analysis of Unconventional Shales: Spraberry-Wolfcamp Example

Shale Gas Plays Screening Criteria A Sweet Spot Evaluation Methodology

Workflows for Sweet Spots Identification in Shale Plays Using Seismic Inversion and Well Logs

Numerical Simulation and Multiple Realizations for Sensitivity Study of Shale Gas Reservoir

Surface seismic data have proven to be an invaluable

Best practices predicting unconventional reservoir quality

Title: Application and use of near-wellbore mechanical rock property information to model stimulation and completion operations

Increasing Production with Better Well Placement in Unconventional Shale Reservoirs

A Review of Three North American Shale Plays: Learnings from Shale Gas Exploration in the Americas*

Halliburton Engineering for Success in Developing Shale Assets

Integrating Geomechanics and Reservoir Characterization Examples from Canadian Shale Plays

LOUISIANA ENERGY CONFERENCE Tuscaloosa Marine Shale An Emerging Oil Play June 27, 2012

2015 Training Course Offerings

Bakken and Three Forks Logging Acquisition for Reservoir Characterization and Completion Optimization

Maximize the potential of seismic data in shale exploration and production Examples from the Barnett shale and the Eagle Ford shale

The Link Between Lithology and Rock Fractures in the Duvernay 2015 Gussow Conference

Barnett Shale-Woodford Shale play of the Delaware basin is it another giant shale gas field in Texas?

Gas Shale Hydraulic Fracturing, Enhancement. Ahmad Ghassemi

Optimized Recovery from Unconventional Reservoirs: How Nanophysics, the Micro-Crack Debate, and Complex Fracture Geometry Impact Operations

SPE These in turn can be used to estimate mechanical properties.

Reservoir Characterization for Shales: a Barnett Shale Case Study

An Integrated Petrophysical Approach for Shale Gas Reservoirs

Horizontal Fracturing in Shale Plays. Matt McKeon

BAKKEN Regional Field Study

Strength, creep and frictional properties of gas shale reservoir rocks

MARCELLUS Regional Field Study

THE STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT OF GEOLOGICAL FRONTIERS: NEW DISCOVERIES AND THE ROLE OF INNOVATION, TECHNOLOGY, MULTILATERAL INVESTMENT

Downloaded 01/29/13 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

An Overview of the Tapia Canyon Field Static Geocellular Model and Simulation Study

Recap and Integrated Rock Mechanics and Natural Fracture Study in the Bakken Formation, Williston Basin

CHAPTER III. METHODOLOGY

Shale Development and Hydraulic Fracturing or Frac ing (Fracking) What is it?

Seismic characterization of Montney shale formation using Passey s approach

The Interaction of Reservoir Engineering and Geomechanics (a story)

Downloaded 10/25/16 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

Core Technology for Evaluating the Bakken

The Bakken. A Non-Shale Shale Play. August 2010

EVALUATION OF KEY FACTORS AFFECTING SUCCESSFUL OIL PRODUCTION IN THE BAKKEN FORMATION, NORTH DAKOTA. Technology Status Assessment.

SHALE SCIENCE ALLIANCE

Technology of Production from Shale

Full-Azimuth 3-D Characterizes Shales

URTeC: Abstract

Information Technology Solutions

Overpressure detection using shear-wave velocity data: a case study from the Kimmeridge Clay Formation, UK Central North Sea

Thin Sweet Spots Identification in the Duvernay Formation of North Central Alberta*

Microseismic Geomechanical Modelling of Asymmetric Upper Montney Hydraulic Fractures

Rock Physics of Organic Shale and Its Implication

Ingrain Laboratories INTEGRATED ROCK ANALYSIS FOR THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

Seismic Geo-Petro Normalisation

2003 GCSSEPM Foundation Ed Picou Fellowship Grant for Graduate Studies in the Earth Sciences Recipient

New Frontier Advanced Multiclient Data Offshore Uruguay. Advanced data interpretation to empower your decision making in the upcoming bid round

Unconventional reservoir characterization using conventional tools

P314 Anisotropic Elastic Modelling for Organic Shales

OTC OTC PP. Abstract

Optimizing Drilling Performance by Wellbore Stability and Pore-Pressure Evaluation in Deepwater Exploration T. Klimentos, Schlumberger

Well Evaluation. An Integrated Well-Evaluation Process for Shale Gas Reservoirs

DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF ROCK PHYSICS PROPERTIES FOR IMPROVED HYDRAULIC FRACTURING IN HYDROCARBON-BEARING SHALE

Seismic reservoir characterisation

Integrating rock physics and full elastic modeling for reservoir characterization Mosab Nasser and John B. Sinton*, Maersk Oil Houston Inc.

Drillworks. DecisionSpace Geomechanics DATA SHEET

Effects of VTI Anisotropy in Shale-Gas Reservoir Characterization

Process, Zeit Bay Fields - Gulf of Suez, Egypt*

Application of Geomechanics and Rock Property Analysis for a Tight Oil Reservoir Development: A Case Study from Barmer Basin, India

ractical Geomechanics for Unconventional Resources

3-4 year research program funded by GeoScience BC, Industry Collaborators NSERC Collaborative Research Development. E. Munson - R.

Recap and Integrated Rock Mechanics and Natural Fracture Study on the Bakken Formation, Williston Basin Abstract Figure 1:

Distinguished Lecturer David A. Ferrill. Sponsored by AAPG Foundation

Unconventional Oil Plays Opportunity vs Risk

Summary. Simple model for kerogen maturity (Carcione, 2000)

Search and Discovery Article # (2015) Posted April 20, 2015

What Can Microseismic Tell Us About Hydraulic Fracturing?

4D stress sensitivity of dry rock frame moduli: constraints from geomechanical integration

Quantifying Bypassed Pay Through 4-D Post-Stack Inversion*

Reservoir Rock Properties COPYRIGHT. Sources and Seals Porosity and Permeability. This section will cover the following learning objectives:

Geomechanical Controls on Hydraulic Fracturing in the Bakken Fm, SK

Identifying fault activation during hydraulic stimulation in the Barnett shale: source mechanisms, b

Regional-Scale Salt Tectonics Modelling: Bench-Scale Validation and Extension to Field-Scale Predictions

Sand Control Rock Failure

Revitalizing Mature Fields

Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies and the Gulf Coast Section of SEPM. Hosted by the South Texas Geological Society

So I have a Seismic Image, But what is in that Image?

FRACTURE REORIENTATION IN HORIZONTAL WELL WITH MULTISTAGE HYDRAULIC FRACTURING

Applying Stimulation Technology to Improve Production in Mature Assets. Society of Petroleum Engineers

RPSEA Research Project Overview

Production-induced stress change in and above a reservoir pierced by two salt domes: A geomechanical model and its applications

Transcription:

HAYNESVILLE Regional Field Study

Field Study Introduction NUTECH has combined its expertise with the emerging interest in North American shale plays in order to develop the most detailed regional field studies available to the E&P industry. These studies have been developed through NUTECH s experience and analysis of several thousand wells with core and production data. Each of NUTECH s studies provides insight into the connectivity across the area by simulating geological and petrophysical property distributions. The results confirm the stratigraphic variability as well as identify and quantify hydrocarbon columns per well and across the study area. NUTECH s management team will provide geological-based input to assist you in decision making on each well, including working closely with your technical personnel in connection with well evaluations and listings.

Field Study Deliverables 1) Individual NULOOK Shale Analysis of each well in the study. Includes core calibrated calculations of permeability, effective porosity, water saturation, TOC, and lithology identification. Presented in pdf and tif format 2) Individual NuList Engineering Summary providing reservoir parameters in tabular form and additional calculations of Net Permeability, Hydrocarbon Pore Volume, and Free and Adsorbed GIP (BCF/sec) or OIP(MMBO/sec). Presented in.xls format 3).las file for each well including the original open hole data going into the petrophysical model, and the curves generated through NULOOK analysis

Field Study Deliverables A sampling of wells taken from the regional study has been selected for NUSTIM horizontal completion optimization. NUSTIM evaluation builds on the Petrophysical & GeoTextural analysis by incorporating completion & economic data to deliver an optimized completion design for the reservoir of interest. Using a 30 scenario frac simulation model, NUSTIM will investigate various completion parameters including lateral landing point, rate, size, concentration, fluid, prop, and cluster spacing in the horizontal. Comparisons of created frac geometry, predicted production & decline, and ultimately Net Present Value will provide the client with an optimized completion design for the reservoir in this area. A recommended landing lateral target & pump schedule for the selected completion design is included. Deliverables for each of the NUSTIM wells will include pdf of the NUSTIM report & also an Executive Summary in PowerPoint format that steps through the NUSTIM process and results. Fracture Geometry Comparison Production Prediction Comparison Net Present Value Optimization

Field Study Deliverables 1. 3D Structural Model using well picks for the top and base of the objectives (although faults exist throughout the trend they were not included in this project due to the regional scope, a lack of seismic data and the stratigraphic nature of the play) 2. Stratigraphic Cross Sections per project area using NuLook presentation 3. 3D Petrophysical Property Distribution Model 4. Multiple Realizations of property distributions for each project area 5. CSIM (Composite Stratigraphic Image Maps) created 6. Printed Scaled Plots of CSIMs, one each (i.e. Average Porosity (PHIE), Clay Volume, Free Fluid porosity (PHIEBVI), Average Permeability (PERMSH Avg) and KH (PERMSH Net), VClay, TOC (Total Organic Carbon), HCPV (Hydrocarbon Pore Volume), Structure and Thickness maps (below are some examples of the maps included) 7. Maps can also be delivered electronically in a zmap plus format (maps can be uploaded into different software packages & overlay maps can be created) 8. Executive Report, Project Binder, and CD 9. NUVIEW PDFs for all wells used in the project (paper copies are available for an additional fee*)

Field Study Deliverables A sampling of wells taken from the regional study has been selected for NUSTIM horizontal completion optimization. NUSTIM evaluation builds on the Petrophysical & GeoTextural analysis by incorporating completion & economic data to deliver an optimized completion design for the reservoir of interest. Using a 30 scenario frac simulation model, NUSTIM will investigate various completion parameters including lateral landing point, rate, size, concentration, fluid, prop, and cluster spacing in the horizontal. Comparisons of created frac geometry, predicted production & decline, and ultimately Net Present Value will provide the client with an optimized completion design for the reservoir in this area. A recommended landing lateral target & pump schedule for the selected completion design is included. Deliverables for each of the NUSTIM wells will include pdf of the NUSTIM report & also an Executive Summary in PowerPoint format that steps through the NUSTIM process and results. Fracture Geometry Comparison Net Present Value Optimization Production Prediction Comparison Field Study Deliverables Geomechanical Analysis Rock Properties such as, Poisson s ratio, Young s modulus, Biot s constant, pore pressure, overburden pressure, in-situ stress profile descriptions, and brittleness 1. Young s Modulus is a measure of the stiffness of the rock. It can be obtained from the measurement of dynamic modulus using sonic log measurements. Calculations of Young s Modulus based on the petrophysical properties of an interval are correlated to core or sonic log measurements, allowing for good predictions in intervals where sonic and core data are not available. This property impacts both the NuStim fracture and production models. Typical Young s Moduli range from 100,000 to 10,000,000 psi 2. Poisson s ratio is a rock property which governs the NuStim fracture growth model. It is a component of the stress profile. Poisson s ratio is defined as the ratio of lateral strain to longitudinal strain. It can be obtained from core measurements or indirectly obtained from sonic log measurements. Calculations of Poisson s ratio based on the petrophysical properties of an interval are correlated to core or sonic log measurements, allowing for good predictions in intervals where sonic and core data are not available. Poisson s ratio values typically range from 0.15 to 0.4 3. Brittleness coefficient (%) - Lower values indicate a ductile zone, while higher values indicate a more brittle interval. A brittle zone is more likely to be naturally fractured and to respond positively to waterfrac stimulation techniques

COUNTY Marion Co Webster Co Upshur Co Bossier Co Gregg Co Harrison Co Caddo Co Bienville Rusk Co Panola Co De Soto Co Red River Co Shelby Co Natc kee Co PETRA 1/17/2014 11:22:38 AM Sabine Co

Haynesville Regional Field Study The Haynesville is a complex stratigraphic sequence that was deposited during the Upper Jurassic within a limited and stratigraphically variable area in the Northeast Texas / North Louisiana section of the Gulf Coast Mesozoic Basin. The thickness and quality of this highly prospective interval is directly related to its depositional position with respect to basement rifting and salt thickness as well as its presence within restricted euxinic areas. This reservoir is further impacted by several transgressive / regressive events plus turbiditic influxes that serve to impact the original development of this complex carbonate / siliceous mudstone sequence. This project focuses on the core area of the Haynesville play along the Texas Louisiana state line and extends outward toward the known limits of this unconventional play. The heterogeneity of this sequence, when combined with its thermal history and geopressure, has a direct impact on the reservoir quality of the Haynesville both with respect to its matrix qualities as well as its fracture stimulation compatibility. This study provides a petrophysical and geological analysis of 41 Haynesville wells that allows insight into the connectivity of textural attributes of the wells with NULOOK Shale Analysis and attribute mapping from NUVIEW. Also available to coincide with the study is NUSTIM Geomechanical Analysis that depicts formation brittleness and fracability identification. Pricing Guide Haynesville 41 wells $75,000 GeoMechanical $25,000

NuTech Energy Alliance Haynesville Regional Field Study Wellname State County API BAKER #1 LOUISIANA BIENVILLE 17013201640000 SUSTAINABLE FOREST #1 LOUISIANA BIENVILLE 17013216490000 USA 74 #6 LOUISIANA BOSSIER 17015236330000 ELM GROVE PLANTATION #15-ALT. LOUISIANA BOSSIER 17015234780000 EGP #63H LOUISIANA BOSSIER 17015243920000 D. L. GISH ETAL #1-23 LOUISIANA CADDO 17017228480000 E & L DEVELOPMENT INC. #1 LOUISIANA CADDO 17017344440000 SENTELL #1-34 LOUISIANA CADDO 17017246960000 HALL 9 #1 LOUISIANA CADDO 17017345970000 CLD 23 #1 LOUISIANA CADDO 17017345330000 BRAY 27-1 LOUISIANA CADDO 17017343140000 CHIGGERO ETAL 14-1 LOUISIANA CADDO 17017342970000 WILLIAMS 22 #3 LOUISIANA CADDO 17017342780000 RONNIE BOZMAN 35 #1 LOUISIANA DE SOTO 17031243110000 WEYERHAEUSER LA #1 LOUISIANA DE SOTO 17031243680000 ROBERT CREWS #3-ALT LOUISIANA DE SOTO 17031243710000 PARKER #1 TEXAS HARRISON 42203336490000 SOHIO R. S. TERRY ESTATE #1 TEXAS MARION 42315301590000 TRAWICK GAS UNIT #2-3 TEXAS NACOGDOCHES 42347301150000 SANDBAR UNIT #1 TEXAS NACOGDOCHES 42347316740000 MARTIN B #1-32 LOUISIANA NATCHITOCHES 17069200730000 JANETTE MESSENGER 8 1 LOUISIANA NATCHITOCHES 17069204080000 FITE UNIT #14 TEXAS PANOLA 42365344100000 ROY S. MANGHAM #2 TEXAS PANOLA 42365306940000 ROLAND ANDERSON GAS UNIT #1 TEXAS PANOLA 42365351030000 MORGAN GAS #1-14 LOUISIANA RED RIVER 17081204430000 A&F WALKER LTD. PART., ET AL #1-28 LOUISIANA RED RIVER 17081208540000 MARTIN TIMBER COLLC #1-10 LOUISIANA RED RIVER 17081208550000 J.W. ADCOCK #1 LOUISIANA RED RIVER 17081208570000 CV RA SUO; LA WILDLIFE NO.1 LOUISIANA RED RIVER 17081209130000 J.W. ADCOCK #2 LOUISIANA RED RIVER 17081208750000 THOMPSON GU #3 #1 TEXAS RUSK 42401308770000 DELAFIELD #1 TEXAS RUSK 42401301730000 MOTLEY #1 TEXAS RUSK 42401306300000 PONE #1 TEXAS RUSK 42401335530000 C.E. WILLIAMSON HEIRS #1 TEXAS RUSK 42401300820000 CRIM #8 TEXAS RUSK 42401337640000 NO.1 WILKERSON GAS UNIT TEXAS RUSK 42401329170000 CATES #1-25 LOUISIANA SABINE 17085205500000 TEMPLE-EASTEX #1 TEXAS SHELBY 42419302740000 ANNIE IRISH #1 TEXAS SHELBY 42419301620000