Magdalena Larfors

Similar documents
Magdalena Larfors. New Ideas at the Interface of Cosmology and String Theory. UPenn, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, München

String-Theory: Open-closed String Moduli Spaces

Conifunneling : An Extreme Path on the String Landscape

Stringy Corrections, SUSY Breaking and the Stabilization of (all) Kähler moduli

On Flux Quantization in F-Theory

Overview of classical mirror symmetry

F- 理論におけるフラックスコンパクト化. Hajime Otsuka( 大塚啓 ) (Waseda U.) Physics Lett. B. 774 (2017) 225 with Y. Honma (National Tsing-Hua U.) Sangyo U.

Looking Beyond Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds. Work in progress with Hans Jockers, Joshua M. Lapan, Maurico Romo and David R.

Web of threefold bases in F-theory and machine learning

New Toric Swiss Cheese Solutions

Counting black hole microstates as open string flux vacua

Inflation in String Theory. mobile D3-brane

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 23 Mar 2018

Heterotic type IIA duality with fluxes and moduli stabilization

THE MASTER SPACE OF N=1 GAUGE THEORIES

The geometry of Landau-Ginzburg models

Mirror symmetry for G 2 manifolds

Generalized N = 1 orientifold compactifications

Dualities and Topological Strings

Pietro Fre' SISSA-Trieste. Paolo Soriani University degli Studi di Milano. From Calabi-Yau manifolds to topological field theories

Heterotic Torsional Backgrounds, from Supergravity to CFT

Computability of non-perturbative effects in the string theory landscape

MIFPA PiTP Lectures. Katrin Becker 1. Department of Physics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. 1

2 Type IIA String Theory with Background Fluxes in d=2

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 3 Jul 2015

SCFTs, Compact CY 3-folds, and Topological Strings

D-Branes and Vanishing Cycles in Higher Dimensions.

Flux Compactification of Type IIB Supergravity

Candidates for Inflation in Type IIB/F-theory Flux Compactifications

Exploring the Kähler potential

On the BCOV Conjecture

Inflation in heterotic supergravity models with torsion

BPS states, Wall-crossing and Quivers

Moduli of heterotic G2 compactifications

Instantons in string theory via F-theory

David R. Morrison. String Phenomenology 2008 University of Pennsylvania 31 May 2008

Disk Instantons, Mirror Symmetry and the Duality Web

Non-Geometric Calabi- Yau Backgrounds

Fixing all moduli in F-theory and type II strings

Homological mirror symmetry via families of Lagrangians

Fixing All Moduli for M-Theory on K3 x K3

Topics in Geometry: Mirror Symmetry

Mirror Symmetry: Introduction to the B Model

Calabi-Yau Fourfolds with non-trivial Three-Form Cohomology

Calabi-Yau Spaces in String Theory

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 28 Mar 2000

String cosmology and the index of the Dirac operator

F-theory and the classification of elliptic Calabi-Yau manifolds

String Theory and Generalized Geometries

Knots and Mirror Symmetry. Mina Aganagic UC Berkeley

Heterotic Vector Bundles, Deformations and Geometric Transitions

Solution Set 8 Worldsheet perspective on CY compactification

On Special Geometry of Generalized G Structures and Flux Compactifications. Hu Sen, USTC. Hangzhou-Zhengzhou, 2007

Disk Instantons, Mirror Symmetry and the Duality Web

Gauge Threshold Corrections for Local String Models

COUNTING BPS STATES IN CONFORMAL GAUGE THEORIES

Disk Instantons, Mirror Symmetry and the Duality Web

Machine learning, incomputably large data sets, and the string landscape

Inflation from flux cascades

Novel potentials for string axion inflation

The exact quantum corrected moduli space for the universal hypermultiplet

Complete classification of Minkowski vacua in generalised flux models

Cosmology of moving branes and spinflation

Topological reduction of supersymmetric gauge theories and S-duality

Some new torsional local models for heterotic strings

Kähler Potential of Moduli Space. of Calabi-Yau d-fold embedded in CP d+1

Calabi-Yau fourfolds for M- and F-Theory compactifications

F-theory effective physics via M-theory. Thomas W. Grimm!! Max Planck Institute for Physics (Werner-Heisenberg-Institut)! Munich

String Moduli Stabilization and Large Field Inflation

On the Virtual Fundamental Class

Gauged Linear Sigma Model and Hemisphpere Partition Function

String Theory Compactifications with Background Fluxes

An exploration of threefold bases in F-theory

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 23 Oct 2008

Interpolating geometries, fivebranes and the Klebanov-Strassler theory

Topics in Geometry: Mirror Symmetry

D-brane instantons in Type II orientifolds

String Phenomenology ???

String Theory. A general overview & current hot topics. Benjamin Jurke. Würzburg January 8th, 2009

Compact T-branes. Teórica. Fernando Marchesano. Instituto de Física UAM-CSIC

1 Electrons on a lattice, with noisy electric field

Yet Another Alternative to Compactification

The Spectra of Type IIB Flux Compactifications at Large Complex Structure

Five-Dimensional Gauge Theories and Local Mirror Symmetry

Compactifications of Heterotic Theory on Non-Kähler Complex Manifolds: I

III. Stabilization of moduli in string theory II

Stringy Instantons, Backreaction and Dimers.

Geometry of the Calabi-Yau Moduli

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 4 Jun 2016

Anomalous discrete symmetries in D-brane models

Differential equations concerned with mirror symmetry of toric K3 hypersurfaces with arithmetic properties. Atsuhira Nagano (University of Tokyo)

Heterotic Standard Models

Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION. Special Geometry. Yang Zhang. Abstract: N = 2 Supergravity. based on hep-th/ , Boris PiolineA

Partial SUSY Breaking for Asymmetric Gepner Models and Non-geometric Flux Vacua

Statistics of supersymmetric vacua in string/m theory

Lectures on Mirror Symmetry

Compactifications of F-Theory on Calabi Yau Threefolds II arxiv:hep-th/ v2 31 May 1996

Affine SU(N) algebra from wall-crossings

Crash Course on Toric Geometry

A Landscape of Field Theories

Transcription:

Uppsala University, Dept. of Theoretical Physics Based on D. Chialva, U. Danielsson, N. Johansson, M.L. and M. Vonk, hep-th/0710.0620 U. Danielsson, N. Johansson and M.L., hep-th/0612222 2008-01-18

String theory lives in 10D, we live in 4D. Compactify. Fluxes. Branes. (universe-review.ca) string theory landscape of vacua

Natural questions: How many vacua? Distribution? Continuously connected? Barriers? (universe-review.ca) Effects from topography Tunneling, domain walls, inflation, finiteness...

1 Flux vacua Ingredients: manifolds, fluxes, branes... enormous landscape! A landscape model Type IIB SUGRA on (conformal) CY 3 fold. 3 fluxes through 3 cycles: fix CS moduli. Generic. Rich structure. Calabi Yau manifolds Complex, Kähler, Ricci flat. h 2,1 Complex structure (CS) moduli. h 1,1 Kähler moduli.

1 Flux vacua Ingredients: manifolds, fluxes, branes... enormous landscape! A landscape model Type IIB SUGRA on (conformal) CY 3 fold. 3 fluxes through 3 cycles: fix CS moduli. Generic. Rich structure. Calabi Yau manifolds Complex, Kähler, Ricci flat. h 2,1 Complex structure (CS) moduli. h 1,1 Kähler moduli.

1 Flux vacua Ingredients: manifolds, fluxes, branes... enormous landscape! A landscape model Type IIB SUGRA on (conformal) CY 3 fold. 3 fluxes through 3 cycles: fix CS moduli. Generic. Rich structure. Calabi Yau manifolds Complex, Kähler, Ricci flat. h 2,1 Complex structure (CS) moduli. h 1,1 Kähler moduli.

Fixing the complex structure Complex structure holomorphic 3-form Ω(z). 3 cycles 3-cycles basis A I, B J. A I α J = B I β J = α I β J = δ IJ Periods Π i (z) = C i Ω(z) z: CS moduli Π(z) = (Π 1 (z), Π 2 (z),...π N (z)) 3 flux IIB: RR F and NS H G = F τh Quantized: C i F F i, C i H H i, F i, H i Z D3 tadpole condition: CY F H = N D3

The potential for CS moduli Fluxes wrapping non-trivial cycles potential V. V = e K ( DW 2 3 W 2) Kähler potential e K 1 = Im(ρ) 3 Imτ Π Q Π Superpotential W = G Π(z) CS moduli and τ fixed at of potential. No-scale: Kähler moduli unfixed perturbatively.

Paths between flux vacua (hep-th/0612222) CS moduli space is complicated: singularities, branch cuts, non trivial loops monodromies of 3-cycles. Idea: Use monodromies to continuously connect vacua.

Monodromies Period monodromies Π(z) T Π(z) T M Sp(N, Z) E.g. Mirror Quintic h 2,1 = 1 CS modulus h 1,1 = 101 Kähler moduli Π i 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 1 0.5 0 Im(z) 0.5 31 2 1 Re(z) 0 1

Recall: V = e K ( DW 2 3 W 2), W = G Π(z) Thus Π(z) T Π(z) V has branch cuts in CS moduli space. Traverse cuts paths between. 150 Π T Π or G G T 100 T M Sp(N, Z) 50 F H unchanged. 0 1 0.5 0 0.5 V 300 250 200 Starting flux configuration: F0 = (2, 9, 2, 10) H0 = (1, 10, 4, 1) Re(z) Im(z)

V V Series of Several continuously connected found: Starting flux configuration: F0 = (1, 9,!7, 1) H0 = (1, 0, 8, 0) Starting flux configuration: F0 = (1, 9,!7, 1) H0 = (1, 0, 8, 0) 1.3 1.2 1.1 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 1 0.5 0 Im(z)!0.5 1 2 3!1 0 Re(z) No infinite series of found. What about flux not related by monodromies ( islands )? 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4!1!0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 Re(z) 2 2.5!1!0.5 0 Im(z) 0.5 1

An extended landscape model 0710.0620 Monodromies: important for topography. Larger moduli space more monodromies. : Moduli spaces of different Calabi Yau 3-folds are connected Idea: extend M 101,1 CS moduli space. Connect it to what?

Mirror symmetry M (86,2) GT M (101,1) M (86,2) M (101,1) shrink 16 3-cycles A i blow up 16 2-cycles a i A 1 A 2 = δd 1... ai = δb A 15 A 16 = δd 15 δd i = 0

Complex (101,1) M Kahler M (86,2) Complex Complex

We need to: Construct M (86,2) (using toric geometry) Complex (101,1) M Kahler Compute periods of M (86,2) M (86,2) Complex Embed M (101,1) in M (86,2) Compute new monodromies with flux? string theory vacua? Complex

Toric geometry Toric geometry Construct CY: zero locus of polynomial equations on toric variety. (C Toric variety: ) n Z G Fans and polytopes toric variety and equations. Batyrev s mirror construction M (2,86) : CI in P 1 P 4 Polytope for M (2,86) : = 1 + 2 Mirror construction: Polytope for M (86,2) : = 1 + 2, k, j δ k,j M (86,2) f 1 1 a 1 t 1 a 2 t 3 a 3 t 4 a 4 t 5 a 5 /t 2 t 3 t 4 t 5 f 2 1 a 6 /t 1 a 7 t 2, CS moduli a i : φ 1 = a 1 a 6, φ 2 = a 2 a 3 a 4 a 5 a 7.

Toric geometry Toric geometry Construct CY: zero locus of polynomial equations on toric variety. (C Toric variety: ) n Z G Fans and polytopes toric variety and equations. Batyrev s mirror construction M (2,86) : CI in P 1 P 4 Polytope for M (2,86) : = 1 + 2 Mirror construction: Polytope for M (86,2) : = 1 + 2, k, j δ k,j M (86,2) f 1 1 a 1 t 1 a 2 t 3 a 3 t 4 a 4 t 5 a 5 /t 2 t 3 t 4 t 5 f 2 1 a 6 /t 1 a 7 t 2, CS moduli a i : φ 1 = a 1 a 6, φ 2 = a 2 a 3 a 4 a 5 a 7.

Toric geometry Toric geometry Construct CY: zero locus of polynomial equations on toric variety. (C Toric variety: ) n Z G Fans and polytopes toric variety and equations. Batyrev s mirror construction M (2,86) : CI in P 1 P 4 Polytope for M (2,86) : = 1 + 2 Mirror construction: Polytope for M (86,2) : = 1 + 2, k, j δ k,j M (86,2) f 1 1 a 1 t 1 a 2 t 3 a 3 t 4 a 4 t 5 a 5 /t 2 t 3 t 4 t 5 f 2 1 a 6 /t 1 a 7 t 2, CS moduli a i : φ 1 = a 1 a 6, φ 2 = a 2 a 3 a 4 a 5 a 7.

M (86,2) periods: 1 The fundamental period ω 0 = 1 1 dt 1 (2πi) γ 5 f 1f 2 t 1... dt5 t 5 Near φ 1 = φ 2 = 0 ω 0 (φ) = n 1,n 2 c(n 1, n 2 )φ n1 1 φn2 2, where c(n 1, n 2 ) = (n1+4n2)!(n1+n2)! (n 1!) 2 (n 2!) 5 Picard Fuchs equations Recall Π i = C i Ω H 3 = H 3,0 H 2,1 H 1,2 H 0,3 is finite L k Ω = dη L k Π i = C i L k Ω = C i dη = 0 We get: 2 DE of degree 2 and 3 6 linearly indep. solutions 6 periods.

M (86,2) periods: 1 The fundamental period ω 0 = 1 1 dt 1 (2πi) γ 5 f 1f 2 t 1... dt5 t 5 Near φ 1 = φ 2 = 0 ω 0 (φ) = n 1,n 2 c(n 1, n 2 )φ n1 1 φn2 2, where c(n 1, n 2 ) = (n1+4n2)!(n1+n2)! (n 1!) 2 (n 2!) 5 Picard Fuchs equations Recall Π i = C i Ω H 3 = H 3,0 H 2,1 H 1,2 H 0,3 is finite L k Ω = dη L k Π i = C i L k Ω = C i dη = 0 We get: 2 DE of degree 2 and 3 6 linearly indep. solutions 6 periods.

M (86,2) periods: 2 The Frobenius method φ 1 = φ 2 = 0 regular singular point five solutions with logarithmic singularities: Using ω(ρ, φ) = n 1,n 2 c(n 1 + ρ 1, n 2 + ρ 2 )φ n1+ρ1 1 φ n2+ρ2 2 we get all periods as: (hep-th/9406055) ω 1 = ρ1 ω ρ=0, ω 2 = ρ2 ω ρ=0, ω 3 = κ 1jk ρj ρk ω ρ=0, ω 4 = κ 2jk ρj ρk ω ρ=0, ω 5 = κ ijk ρi ρj ρk ω ρ=0 κ ijk = J i J j J k classical intersection numbers. Want integral and symplectic monodromies: change basis. (No details here).

Embed M (101,1) in M (86,2) M (86,2) Recall: f 1 1 a 1 t 1 a 2 t 3 a 3 t 4 a 4 t 5 a 5 /t 2 t 3 t 4 t 5 = 0 f 2 1 a 6 /t 1 a 7 t 2 = 0. M (101,1) Substitute f 2 into f 1 b 0 + b 1 u 1 + b 2 u 2 + b 3 u 3 + b 4 u 4 + b5 u 1u 2u 3u 4 + b6 u 1u 2u 3 = 0 Redefined CS moduli z 1 = b1b2b3b6 b0 4 = φ2 (1 φ 1) 4 and z 2 = b1b2b3b4b5 b 5 0 Take z 1 0: Mirror quintic equation! = φ1φ2 (1 φ 1) 5

Embed M (101,1) in M (86,2) M (86,2) Recall: f 1 1 a 1 t 1 a 2 t 3 a 3 t 4 a 4 t 5 a 5 /t 2 t 3 t 4 t 5 = 0 f 2 1 a 6 /t 1 a 7 t 2 = 0. M (101,1) Substitute f 2 into f 1 b 0 + b 1 u 1 + b 2 u 2 + b 3 u 3 + b 4 u 4 + b5 u 1u 2u 3u 4 + b6 u 1u 2u 3 = 0 Redefined CS moduli z 1 = b1b2b3b6 b0 4 = φ2 (1 φ 1) 4 and z 2 = b1b2b3b4b5 b 5 0 Take z 1 0: Mirror quintic equation! = φ1φ2 (1 φ 1) 5

The mirror quintic locus The MQ locus z 1 0: Which period vanish? Monodromy around the locus? Analytically continue ω 0 ω 0 = (4m 1+5m 2)! m 1,m 2=0 ((m 1+m 2)!) 3 m 1!(m 2!) z m1 2 1 zm2 2. z 1 0: MQ fundamental period. Other periods: Analytically continue ω i : focus on derivatives.

The mirror quintic locus The MQ locus z 1 0: Which period vanish? Monodromy around the locus? Analytically continue ω 0 ω 0 = (4m 1+5m 2)! m 1,m 2=0 ((m 1+m 2)!) 3 m 1!(m 2!) z m1 2 1 zm2 2. z 1 0: MQ fundamental period. Other periods: Analytically continue ω i : focus on derivatives.

Embedded periods and monodromies Periods Integral and symplectic basis: Π (86,2) = Π 1 Π 2 Π 3 Π 4 Π 5 Π 6 z 1 0 Π MQ 1 Π MQ 2 Π MQ 3 Π MQ 4 0 ci Π MQ i New paths between vacua 4 new monodromies.. New series of MQ vacua Complex Complex (101,1) M Kahler M (86,2) Complex

A: shrinking 3 cycle, B: torn 3 cycle. Need to be careful: M (86,2) monodromy might yield flux through A or B! Flux through A hep-th/9811131, 0008142... RR/NS flux through shrinking 3 cycle A: D5/NS5 branes on new 2 cycles. Positions of 5 branes new open string moduli. New period: Π B (t, z) = B Ω V MQ(z) Ṽ MQ (t, z).

Flux through B 0709.4277, hep-th/0510042 RR/NS Flux through torn 3-cycle B D1/F1-instantons? No new terms in the MQ potential.

Flux through both 3 cycles A and B New open string moduli Tadpole condition: F H might change D3 branes. Examples N RR-flux through A, M NS-flux through B: either N D5 branes and M F1 instantons or compact Klebanov Strassler: N D5 branes, MN D3 branes. N RR-flux through A, M RR-flux through B: N D5 branes, maybe M D1 instantons, no D3 branes.

Flux potential at transition Near transition point: V (86,2) (z 1, z 2 ) = V 1 (z 1, z 2 ) + V 2 (z 2 ); V 2 (z 2 ) z1 0 V MQ (z) With flux through A: V 1 (z 1, z 2 ) z1 0 Without flux through A: V 1 (z 1, z 2 ) z1 0 0 No flux through shrinking cycle geometric transition controlled. Look for connected without such flux.

Requirements Apply monodromy n times: F 0 F 0 T n If T = 1 + Θ, Θ 2 = 0 F 0 T n = F 0 + nf 0 T Start flux F 0, H 0 F 0 T = F L V 1.2 1.15 1.1 1.05 1 F = (1, 1, 0,!2) H = (5, 7, 2,!8),! " V=0 Limit flux F L, H L has minimum F L H L = 0 F L T = F L 0.95 0.9 1 0.5 0 Im(z)!0.5!1 0 1 Re(z) 2 3 F 0 = F 0 + nf L, H 0 = H 0 + nh L infinite number of. N.B. Kähler moduli not fixed.

Semi-discrete landscape. Topography dynamics. Monodromies connect vacua. New, continuous paths. The new paths allow us to connect more vacua continuously. find infinite series of. describe domain walls. use connected moduli spaces. Kähler moduli dynamics. Back reaction. Transition. Tunnelling between. Inflation.