a) Prepare a normal probability plot of the effects. Which effects seem active?

Similar documents
STAT451/551 Homework#11 Due: April 22, 2014

Institutionen för matematik och matematisk statistik Umeå universitet November 7, Inlämningsuppgift 3. Mariam Shirdel

ST3232: Design and Analysis of Experiments

APPENDIX 1. Binodal Curve calculations

CSCI 688 Homework 6. Megan Rose Bryant Department of Mathematics William and Mary

Suppose we needed four batches of formaldehyde, and coulddoonly4runsperbatch. Thisisthena2 4 factorial in 2 2 blocks.

20g g g Analyze the residuals from this experiment and comment on the model adequacy.

3.4. A computer ANOVA output is shown below. Fill in the blanks. You may give bounds on the P-value.

Contents. TAMS38 - Lecture 8 2 k p fractional factorial design. Lecturer: Zhenxia Liu. Example 0 - continued 4. Example 0 - Glazing ceramic 3

Chapter 30 Design and Analysis of

The One-Quarter Fraction

23. Fractional factorials - introduction

19. Blocking & confounding

Strategy of Experimentation III

Chapter 11: Factorial Designs

Session 3 Fractional Factorial Designs 4

Experimental design (DOE) - Design

Fractional Replications

Homework 04. , not a , not a 27 3 III III

Answer Keys to Homework#10

Assignment 9 Answer Keys

USE OF COMPUTER EXPERIMENTS TO STUDY THE QUALITATIVE BEHAVIOR OF SOLUTIONS OF SECOND ORDER NEUTRAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

Higher Order Factorial Designs. Estimated Effects: Section 4.3. Main Effects: Definition 5 on page 166.

Fractional Factorial Designs

TWO-LEVEL FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS: REGULAR FRACTIONAL FACTORIALS

Unit 6: Fractional Factorial Experiments at Three Levels

Factorial Experiments

Unreplicated 2 k Factorial Designs

Design and Analysis of

The 2 k Factorial Design. Dr. Mohammad Abuhaiba 1

Fractional Factorials

Math Treibergs. Peanut Oil Data: 2 5 Factorial design with 1/2 Replication. Name: Example April 22, Data File Used in this Analysis:

CS 5014: Research Methods in Computer Science

Contents. 2 2 factorial design 4

A Statistical Approach to the Study of Qualitative Behavior of Solutions of Second Order Neutral Differential Equations

FRACTIONAL FACTORIAL

ESTIMATION METHODS FOR MISSING DATA IN UN-REPLICATED 2 FACTORIAL AND 2 FRACTIONAL FACTORIAL DESIGNS

Construction of Mixed-Level Orthogonal Arrays for Testing in Digital Marketing

Confounding and fractional replication in 2 n factorial systems

2 k, 2 k r and 2 k-p Factorial Designs

FRACTIONAL REPLICATION

Confidence Interval for the mean response

LECTURE 10: LINEAR MODEL SELECTION PT. 1. October 16, 2017 SDS 293: Machine Learning

Soo King Lim Figure 1: Figure 2: Figure 3: Figure 4: Figure 5: Figure 6: Figure 7: Figure 8: Figure 9: Figure 10: Figure 11: Figure 12: Figure 13:

Chapter 13 Experiments with Random Factors Solutions

Statistics GIDP Ph.D. Qualifying Exam Methodology May 26 9:00am-1:00pm

Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments

Lecture 12: 2 k p Fractional Factorial Design

2.830J / 6.780J / ESD.63J Control of Manufacturing Processes (SMA 6303) Spring 2008

TMA4267 Linear Statistical Models V2017 (L19)

Reference: Chapter 8 of Montgomery (8e)

Reference: Chapter 6 of Montgomery(8e) Maghsoodloo

MATH 251 MATH 251: Multivariate Calculus MATH 251 FALL 2006 EXAM-II FALL 2006 EXAM-II EXAMINATION COVER PAGE Professor Moseley

LEARNING WITH MINITAB Chapter 12 SESSION FIVE: DESIGNING AN EXPERIMENT

Probability Distribution

CS 5014: Research Methods in Computer Science. Experimental Design. Potential Pitfalls. One-Factor (Again) Clifford A. Shaffer.

Design of Experiments SUTD - 21/4/2015 1

Statistics GIDP Ph.D. Qualifying Exam Methodology May 26 9:00am-1:00pm

Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments

The hypergeometric distribution - theoretical basic for the deviation between replicates in one germination test?

MATH 251 MATH 251: Multivariate Calculus MATH 251 FALL 2005 EXAM-I FALL 2005 EXAM-I EXAMINATION COVER PAGE Professor Moseley

Contents. TAMS38 - Lecture 6 Factorial design, Latin Square Design. Lecturer: Zhenxia Liu. Factorial design 3. Complete three factor design 4

CS 484 Data Mining. Association Rule Mining 2

Strategy of Experimentation II

MATH 251 MATH 251: Multivariate Calculus MATH 251 FALL 2005 EXAM-3 FALL 2005 EXAM-III EXAMINATION COVER PAGE Professor Moseley

A note on inertial motion

Reference: CHAPTER 7 of Montgomery(8e)

Unit 5: Fractional Factorial Experiments at Two Levels

Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments Part Two

TWO-LEVEL FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS: BLOCKING. Upper-case letters are associated with factors, or regressors of factorial effects, e.g.

Contents. TAMS38 - Lecture 10 Response surface. Lecturer: Jolanta Pielaszkiewicz. Response surface 3. Response surface, cont. 4

Fractional Factorial Designs

Unit 9: Confounding and Fractional Factorial Designs

Model Building Chap 5 p251

CHAPTER 12 DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS

UNIT 3 BOOLEAN ALGEBRA (CONT D)

Design of Experiments SUTD 06/04/2016 1

CHAPTER 5 KARNAUGH MAPS

Geometry Problem Solving Drill 08: Congruent Triangles

Exercise 1. min_sup = 0.3. Items support Type a 0.5 C b 0.7 C c 0.5 C d 0.9 C e 0.6 F

MATH 251 MATH 251: Multivariate Calculus MATH 251 FALL 2005 EXAM-IV FALL 2005 EXAM-IV EXAMINATION COVER PAGE Professor Moseley

Lecture 11: Blocking and Confounding in 2 k design

MATH602: APPLIED STATISTICS

Multiple Regression Examples

On the Compounds of Hat Matrix for Six-Factor Central Composite Design with Fractional Replicates of the Factorial Portion

Analysis of Covariance. The following example illustrates a case where the covariate is affected by the treatments.

IE 361 Exam 3 (Form A)

Lec 10: Fractions of 2 k Factorial Design

Karnaugh Map & Boolean Expression Simplification

Written Exam (2 hours)

2.830J / 6.780J / ESD.63J Control of Manufacturing Processes (SMA 6303) Spring 2008

Confounding and Fractional Replication in Factorial Design

Chapter 6 The 2 k Factorial Design Solutions

Solutions to Exercises

Design of Engineering Experiments Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorials

Lecture 14: 2 k p Fractional Factorial Design

Design and Analysis of Experiments

Lecture 10: 2 k Factorial Design Montgomery: Chapter 6

Design & Analysis of Experiments 7E 2009 Montgomery

SMAM 314 Computer Assignment 5 due Nov 8,2012 Data Set 1. For each of the following data sets use Minitab to 1. Make a scatterplot.

Transcription:

Problema 8.6: R.D. Snee ( Experimenting with a large number of variables, in experiments in Industry: Design, Analysis and Interpretation of Results, by R. D. Snee, L.B. Hare, and J. B. Trout, Editors, ASQC, 985) describes an experiment in which a 5- design with I = ABCDE was used to investigate the effects of five factors on the color of a chemical product. The factors are A= solvent/reactant, B = catalyst/reactant, C = temperature, D = reactant purity, and E = reactant ph. The results obtained were as follows: Tratamientos Resultados e -.6 a.5 b -.68 abe.66 c.6 ace. bce -.9 abc.9 d 6.79 ade 5.7 bde.5 abd 5.68 cde 5. acd.8 bcd. abcde.5 a) Prepare a normal probability plot of the effects. Which effects seem active?

Normal Probability Plot of the Effects (response is Results, Alpha =.5) 95 9 8 7 6 5 D Effect Type Not Significant Significant Factor Name A A B B C C D D E E 5 - - Effect 5 Lenth's PSE =.765 El efecto significativo es la D = pureza del reactante. b) Calculate the residuals. Construct a normal probability plot of the residuals and plot the residuals versus the fitted values. Comment on the plots. Normal Probability Plot of the s 9 5 Plots for Results s Versus the Fitted Values - - -... Fitted Value.6.8 Histogram of the s s Versus the Order of the Data Frequency - - - - 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 Observation Order Los residuales muestran un comportamiento aproximadamente normal y al compararlos con los fitted values no se ve un cambio en la varianza poco significativo.

c) If any factors are negligible, collapse the 5- design into a full factorial in the active factors. Comment on the resulting design, and interpret the results. Factorial Fit: Respuesta versus D Estimated Effects and Coefficients for Respuesta (coded units) Term Effect Coef SE Coef T P Constant.78.9 6.7. D...9 5.7. S =.6556 R-Sq = 68.% R-Sq(adj) = 65.86% Analysis of Variance for Respuesta (coded units) Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P Main Effects 78.6 78.56 78.6 9.9. Error 6.5 6.57.6 Pure Error 6.5 6.57.6 Total 5.686 Unusual Observations for Respuesta Obs StdOrder Respuesta Fit SE Fit St Resid -.68.975.579 -.775 -.R R denotes an observation with a large standardized residual. Alias Structure I D Normal Probability Plot of the s 9 5 Plots for Respuesta s Versus the Fitted Values - - -... Fitted Value.6.8 Histogram of the s s Versus the Order of the Data Frequency - - - - 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 Observation Order

Problema 8.8: An article in Industrial and Engineering Chemistry uses a 5- design to investigate the effect of A = condensation temperature, B = amount of material, C = solvent volume, D = condensation time, and E = amount of material on yield. The results obtained are as follows: Tratamientos e. ab 5.5 ad 6.9 bc 6. cd.8 ace. bde 6.8 abcde 8. Resultados a) Verify that the design generators used were I = ACE and I = BDE. Factors: 5 Base Design:, 8 Resolution: III Runs: 8 Replicates: Fraction: / Blocks: Center pts (total): * NOTE * Some main effects are confounded with two-way interactions. Design Generators: D = ABC, E = AC Alias Structure (up to order ) I + ACE + BDE A + CE + BCD + ABDE B + DE + ACD + ABCE C + AE + ABD + BCDE D + BE + ABC + ACDE E + AC + BD + ABCDE AB + CD + ADE + BCE AD + BC + ABE + CDE ABCD Los generadores si son ACE y BDE.

b) Write down the complete defining relation and the aliases for this design. A = CE = BCD = ABDE B = DE = ACD = ABCE C = AE = ABD = BCDE D = BE = ABC = ACDE E = AC = BD = ABCDE AB = CD = ADE = BCE AD = BC = ABE = CDE ABCD c) Estimate the main effects. Estimated Effects and Coefficients for Respuesta (coded units) Term Effect Coef SE Coef T P Constant 9.8.787.. A -.55 -.76.787 -.97.5 B -5.75 -.587.787 -.9.8 C.75.8.787.5.85 D -.675 -.7.787 -..7 E.75.8.787.5.85 S =.66 R-Sq = 88.95% R-Sq(adj) = 6.% Normal Probability Plot of the Effects (response is Respuesta, Alpha =.5) 95 9 8 7 6 5 Effect Type Not Significant Significant Factor Name A A B B C C D D E E 5-7.5-5. -.5. Effect.5 5. Lenth's PSE =.775 No se ve ningun factor significativo sin embargo se verifico que factor tiene un efecto mayor sobre la respuesta con el siguiente grafico:

Main Effects Plot (data means) for Respuesta A B C Mean of Respuesta 8 6 - D - - E 8 6 - - Se observa que B es el que mas impacta la respuesta. d) Prepare an analysis of variance table. Verify that the AB and AD interactions are available to use as error. Analysis of Variance for Respuesta (coded units) Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P Main Effects 5 79.86 79.86 5.965 * * -Way Interactions 9.9 9.9.956 * * Error * * * Total 7 89.79 Effects Plot for Respuesta Alias Structure I + A*C*E + B*D*E + A*B*C*D A + C*E + B*C*D + A*B*D*E B + D*E + A*C*D + A*B*C*E C + A*E + A*B*D + B*C*D*E D + B*E + A*B*C + A*C*D*E E + A*C + B*D + A*B*C*D*E A*D + B*C + A*B*E + C*D*E A*B + C*D + A*D*E + B*C*E Dejando las interacciones mencionadas por fuera no se obtiene aun grados de libertad para el error. Sabiendo que B es el que mas impacta, se procedió a realizar una anova incluyendo solo el factor B:

Factorial Fit: Respuesta versus B Estimated Effects and Coefficients for Respuesta (coded units) Term Effect Coef SE Coef T P Constant 9.8.868.6. B -5.75 -.588.868 -.98.5 S =.555 R-Sq = 59.69% R-Sq(adj) = 5.97% Analysis of Variance for Respuesta (coded units) Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P Main Effects 5.56 5.56 5.56 8.88.5 Error 6 6.775 6.775 6. Pure Error 6 6.775 6.775 6. Total 7 89.788 Unusual Observations for Respuesta Obs StdOrder Respuesta Fit SE Fit St Resid 7 6.9.85.78 -.95 -.R R denotes an observation with a large standardized residual. * NOTE * Normal and Pareto effects plots require at least terms. Alias Structure I B e) Plot the residuals versus the fitted values. Also construct a normal probability plot of the residuals. Plots for Respuesta Normal Probability Plot of the s s Versus the Fitted Values 9 5. -.5-5. -.5..5 5. -5. 6 8 Fitted Value. Histogram of the s s Versus the Order of the Data Frequency.5..5. -.5. -5 - - - - -5. 5 6 Observation Order 7 8

Se observa un comportamiento aproximadamente normal, pero parece que a mayor valor en la respuesta mayor varianza en los residuales. Problema.9: An experiment was performed to investigate the capability of a measurement system. Ten parts were randomly selected, and two randomly selected operators measured each part three times. The tests were made in random order, and the data below resulted. Part number Operator Operator 5 9 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 9 5 5 8 5 5 5 8 9 8 8 9 8 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 9 5 8 5 9 5 5 5 5 8 9 7 6 9 6 7 8 General Linear Model: results versus operador, Part number Factor Type Levels Values operador random, Part number random,,,, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Analysis of Variance for results, using Adjusted SS for Tests Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P operador.7.7.7.69.7 Part number 9.7.7. 8.8. operador*part number 9 5.7 5.7.6..97 Error 6. 6..5 Total 59 6.85

Normal Probability Plot of the s (response is results).9 95 9 8 7 6 5 5. - - - Según lo anterior la interacción de las partes con el operador no es significativa. b) Find point estimates of the variance components using the analysis of variance method. σ = MS E =.5 σ τβ = (MS AB MS E ) / n = (.68 -.5) / <, asumiendo σ τβ = σ τ = (MS B MS AB ) / an = (.8 -.68) / * =.7 σ β = (MS A MS AB ) / bn <, asumiendo σ τ =