Dpp Gradient Formation in the Drosophila Wing Imaginal Disc

Similar documents
Pattern formation: Wingless on the move Robert Howes and Sarah Bray

purpose of this Chapter is to highlight some problems that will likely provide new

Segment boundary formation in Drosophila embryos

Axis Specification in Drosophila

On the Mechanism of Wing Size Determination in Fly Development

Understanding morphogenetic growth control lessons from flies

Supplementary Materials for

Supplementary Materials for

Axis Specification in Drosophila

Cell Cell Communication in Development

Axis Specification in Drosophila

Supplementary Information

The Imperatives of Context and Contour for Morphogen Dispersion

Midterm 1. Average score: 74.4 Median score: 77

Morphogens in biological development: Drosophila example

Biol403 - Receptor Serine/Threonine Kinases

Chapter 4 Evaluating a potential interaction between deltex and git in Drosophila: genetic interaction, gene overexpression and cell biology assays.

Cell-Cell Communication in Development

Cell-Cell Communication in Development

Development of Drosophila

Introduction. Gene expression is the combined process of :

Regulation and signaling. Overview. Control of gene expression. Cells need to regulate the amounts of different proteins they express, depending on

Developmental genetics: finding the genes that regulate development

Robustness of Tissue Patterns*

Chapter 18 Lecture. Concepts of Genetics. Tenth Edition. Developmental Genetics

Formation of the Long Range Dpp Morphogen Gradient

Optimization of Immunoblot Protocol for Use with a Yeast Strain Containing the CDC7 Gene Tagged with myc

A re-evaluation of the contributions of Apterous and Notch to the dorsoventral lineage restriction boundary in the Drosophila wing

Drosophila Life Cycle

Lecture 7. Development of the Fruit Fly Drosophila

Why Flies? stages of embryogenesis. The Fly in History

Supplemental Information. The Mitochondrial Fission Receptor MiD51. Requires ADP as a Cofactor

Establishing positional information through gradient dynamics

Genetic characterization of the Drosophila homologue of coronin

The function of engrailed and the specification of Drosophila wing pattern

Cellular Neurobiology BIPN 140 Fall 2016 Problem Set #8

Dpp Signaling Activity Requires Pentagone to Scale with Tissue Size in the Growing Drosophila Wing Imaginal Disc

targets. clustering show that different complex pathway

4) Please cite Dagda et al J Biol Chem 284: , for any publications or presentations resulting from use or modification of the macro.

Gradient Formation of the TGF- Homolog Dpp

7.013 Problem Set

Mechanisms of size control Christopher J Potter* and Tian Xu

Chapter 11. Development: Differentiation and Determination

Axis determination in flies. Sem 9.3.B.5 Animal Science

AP Biology Gene Regulation and Development Review

MOLECULAR CONTROL OF EMBRYONIC PATTERN FORMATION

13-3. Synthesis-Secretory pathway: Sort lumenal proteins, Secrete proteins, Sort membrane proteins

Evolution of Transcription factor function: Homeotic (Hox) proteins

Developmental Biology 3230 Midterm Exam 1 March 2006

THE Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway regulates

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Drosophila wing. Temporal regulation of Apterous activity during development of the. Marco Milán and Stephen M. Cohen* SUMMARY

16 The Cell Cycle. Chapter Outline The Eukaryotic Cell Cycle Regulators of Cell Cycle Progression The Events of M Phase Meiosis and Fertilization

Morphogen gradient interpretation by a regulated trafficking step during ligand receptor transduction

Cell Biology Review. The key components of cells that concern us are as follows: 1. Nucleus

The dynamics of developmental system drift in the gene network underlying wing polyphenism in ants: a mathematical model

downstream (0.8 kb) homologous sequences to the genomic locus of DIC. A DIC mutant strain (ro- 6

Cell Death & Trophic Factors II. Steven McLoon Department of Neuroscience University of Minnesota

BILD7: Problem Set. 2. What did Chargaff discover and why was this important?

BE 159: Signal Transduction and Mechanics in Morphogenesis

Signal Transduction. Dr. Chaidir, Apt

1. What are the three general areas of the developing vertebrate limb? 2. What embryonic regions contribute to the developing limb bud?

Two Frizzled Planar Cell Polarity Signals in the Drosophila Wing Are Differentially Organized by the Fat/Dachsous Pathway

7.06 Spring 2004 PS 6 KEY 1 of 14

Morphogens, their identification and regulation

RNA Synthesis and Processing

Unicellular: Cells change function in response to a temporal plan, such as the cell cycle.

Reception The target cell s detection of a signal coming from outside the cell May Occur by: Direct connect Through signal molecules

Name: TF: Section Time: LS1a ICE 5. Practice ICE Version B

7.06 Cell Biology EXAM #3 KEY

Supplementary Figure 1.

TGF-β/BMP superfamily members, Gbb-60A and Dpp, cooperate to provide pattern information and establish cell identity in the Drosophila wing

From DNA to Diversity

Supplementary Information

Ultrabithorax regulates genes at several levels of the wing-patterning hierarchy to shape the development of the Drosophila haltere

9/4/2015 INDUCTION CHAPTER 1. Neurons are similar across phyla Thus, many different model systems are used in developmental neurobiology. Fig 1.

Zool 3200: Cell Biology Exam 5 4/27/15

7.06 Problem Set #4, Spring 2005

BME 5742 Biosystems Modeling and Control

Formation of the BMP activity gradient in the Drosophila embryo

Richik N. Ghosh, Linnette Grove, and Oleg Lapets ASSAY and Drug Development Technologies 2004, 2:

Wingless transduction by the Frizzled and Frizzled2 proteins of Drosophila

Types of biological networks. I. Intra-cellurar networks

Drosophila limb development

Supplementary Figure 1: Mechanism of Lbx2 action on the Wnt/ -catenin signalling pathway. (a) The Wnt/ -catenin signalling pathway and its

AT THE EDGE OF DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY: ADVANCES AND MYSTERIES ABOUT THE WNT GENES

Question Set # 4 Answer Key 7.22 Nov. 2002

Principles of Experimental Embryology

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Harvard Medical School Brigham and Women s Hospital VA Boston Healthcare System 2.79J/3.96J/BE.

Bi 1x Spring 2014: LacI Titration

Drosophila melanogaster- Morphogen Gradient

Developmental Biology Lecture Outlines

Developmental Biology

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Compartments and the control of growth in the Drosophila wing imaginal disc

review The interplay between morphogens and tissue growth review Andrés Dekanty 1 & Marco Milán 1,2+

Illegitimate translation causes unexpected gene expression from on-target out-of-frame alleles

7.06 Cell Biology EXAM #3 April 21, 2005

POSITIVE FEEDBACK REGULATION OF WISHFUL THINKING SHAPES BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN SIGNALING IN THE FOLLICULAR EPITHELIUM ROBERT MARMION

MBios 401/501: Lecture 14.2 Cell Differentiation I. Slide #1. Cell Differentiation

Transcription:

Cell, Vol. 103, 971 980, December 8, 2000, Copyright 2000 by Cell Press Dpp Gradient Formation in the Drosophila Wing Imaginal Disc Aurelio A. Teleman and Stephen M. Cohen* European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr 1 69117 Heidelberg Germany Summary The secreted signaling protein Dpp acts as a morphogen to pattern the anterior posterior axis of the Dro- sophila wing. Dpp activity is required in all cells of the developing wing imaginal disc, but the ligand gradient that supports this activity has not been characterized. Here we make use of a biologically active form of Dpp tagged with GFP to examine the ligand gradient. Dpp- GFP forms an unstable extracellular gradient that spreads rapidly in the wing disc. The activity gradient visualized by MAD phosphorylation differs in shape from the ligand gradient. The pmad gradient adjusted to compartment size when this was experimentally altered. These observations suggest that the Dpp activity gradient may be shaped at the level of receptor activation. Introduction are produced by cells adjacent to the compartment boundaries and act symmetrically in both compartments. Therefore, the observation that compartment sizes can be controlled independently suggests that the size compensation process is unlikely to affect morphogen production directly, but may work downstream. The interaction between a particular morphogen gradient and tissue growth depends on the kinetic characteristics of the ligand. Two types of gradients can be envisioned low throughput and high throughput. A low-throughput gradient could be formed by a stable signaling molecule that spreads slowly to reach all points in the tissue. This could occur if the ligand inter- acts strongly with extracellular matrix or with proteins on cell surfaces. New cells are added uniformly throughout the imaginal disc, so we would expect tissue growth to aid in the transport and dilution of ligand. Thus, growth would drive gradient formation and patterning would be inherently coupled to growth. The principle that cells could spread a stable molecule by displacement during growth has been illustrated by lineage tracing cells born in the Dpp or Spalt expression domains of the wing disc (Weigmann and Cohen, 1999). In contrast, a high- throughput gradient could be formed by an unstable signaling molecule that moves quickly through the tissue. Since the ligand moves rapidly compared to cellular displacements caused by tissue growth, the distribution of an unstable ligand should not be affected much by differential tissue growth rates. The spreading of ligand would not be coupled to tissue growth and the accom- modation of the morphogen gradient to the size of the field being patterned would require more complex regu- lation. Wingless forms a high-throughput gradient in the wing disc (Strigini and Cohen, 2000). The properties of the Dpp morphogen gradient have not been reported. Until now the evidence that Dpp forms a long-range ligand gradient in the wing disc has been indirect. Dpp has been shown to form an activity gradient which regulates the expression domains of several genes (Lecuit et al., 1996; Nellen et al., 1996; Tsunei- zumi et al., 1997; Campbell and Tomlinson, 1999; Jaz- winska et al., 1999; Minami et al., 1999; Tanimoto et al., 2000). It has been inferred that Dpp acts directly on distant cells, because all cells must be able to transduce the Dpp signal for normal patterning. However, pre- viously, it has not been possible to visualize the longrange Dpp ligand gradient due to lack of suitable reagents. With the recent description of cytonemes long cytoplasmic projections which all cells in the wing disc extend to the A/P boundary the possibility arises that The size of adult organisms can vary considerably de- pending on genetic factors or on exogenous factors such as nutrition. For example, Drosophila larvae reared in crowded conditions can produce adults that are much smaller than those produced by a well-fed larva. Though small, flies raised under these conditions are morpho- logically normal. Recently, it has been shown that signaling through the insulin-receptor/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway can modulate tissue growth rates (reviewed in Weinkove and Leevers, 2000). Muta- tions in components of the insulin-signaling pathway, including chico/irs1-4 and p70 S6K can lead to the production of small, yet normally patterned adult flies (Böhni et al., 1999; Montagne et al., 1999). These observations indicate that the mechanisms used to organize spatial pattern in the developing imaginal discs have the capac- ity to compensate for quite substantial differences in the size of the field in which they work. The developing wing imaginal disc is subdivided into compartments. Experiments in which PI3K pathway ac- tivity was modulated in a compartment-specific manner have shown that compartment sizes can be controlled independently (Goberdhan et al., 1999; Montagne et al., Dpp does not form a concentration gradient, but inter- 1999; Weinkove et al., 1999; Verdu et al., 1999). Under acts locally with cytoneme termini to exert its long-range these conditions the patterning system in particular effects (Ramirez-Weber and Kornberg, 1999). the Wingless and Dpp morphogen activity gradients Here we examine the properties of the Dpp morpho- (Lecuit et al., 1996; Nellen et al., 1996; Zecca et al., gen gradient using a biologically active form of Dpp 1996; Neumann and Cohen, 1997) must be scaled to tagged with Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP). Dpp-GFP accommodate to altered tissue sizes. Wingless and Dpp forms an unstable long-range extracellular gradient. It moves rapidly through the tissue and is rapidly turned over. Yet, the Dpp activity gradient scales to the size of * To whom correspondence should be addressed (e-mail: cohen@ embl-heidelberg.de). the compartment over a broad range of sizes. We pre-

Cell 972 Figure 1. Biological Properties of Dpp-GFP (A) Diagram of the Dpp-GFP construct. Amino acid residues flanking the GFP insertion site are indicated. (B) Immunoblot of GFP-containing proteins. S2 cells were transfected with the Dpp-GFP construct and induced for two days. Cell lysates and conditioned medium were immunoprecipitated with rabbit anti-gfp and blots were probed with mouse anti-gfp. Most of the processed GFP-ligand was present in the medium while the unprocessed, higher molecular weight forms were cell-associated. (C) dpp d8 /dpp d12 mutant wing. The wing blade is almost entirely missing. Some wing hinge structures are present. (D) Upper panel: dpp d8 /dpp d12 mutant wing rescued by expression of UAS-Dpp-GFP under dpp GAL4 control. Wing size and pattern are almost normal except that ectopic vein material was seen near vein 3 and the spacing between veins 3 and 4 was slightly increased. Lower panel: dpp d8 /dpp d12 mutant wing disc rescued by expression of UAS-Dpp-GFP under dpp GAL4 control. pmad (red), Spalt (blue) and Dpp-GFP (green). (E) Upper panel: wildtype wing shown at the same magnification as the mutant and rescued wings in (C) and (D). Lower panel: wild-type wing disc labeled as in (D). sent evidence that the shape of the Dpp-GFP ligand gradient and the activity gradient that it generates differ substantially. Regulation of the shape of the activity gradient may provide the means to scale the morphogen gradient to the size of the field being patterned. Results overexpression of wild-type Dpp (not shown). As a more stringent evaluation of Dpp-GFP activity, we asked whether Dpp-GFP could replace endogenous Dpp in wing development. Wing size is strongly reduced in dpp d8 /dpp d12 mutant flies (Figure 1C). Expression of Dpp- GFP in the endogenous Dpp domain restored near normal growth and patterning of the wing in this mutant background (Figures 1D and 1E). The Dpp-GFP activity gradient was visualized in wild-type and rescued wing discs using an antibody that recognizes a form of MAD that is phosphorylated by the activated Dpp receptor (pmad; Tanimoto et al., 2000) and by expression of Spalt, which is induced by Dpp signaling. dpp d8 /dpp d12 discs had small wing primordia and expressed very low levels of pmad and Spalt, consistent with a reduction in Dpp activity (not shown). Nuclear pmad and Spalt expression were restored in the rescued wing discs (Fig- ures 1D and 1E). Thus, Dpp-GFP is capable of forming a long-range activity gradient in the wing imaginal disc. The properties of Dpp-GFP appear to be sufficiently similar to those of the endogenous Dpp protein to sup- port normal wing development. For the analysis that follows, we make use of Dpp-GFP as a surrogate for endogenous Dpp. Dpp-GFP Supports Wing Development To investigate the properties of the Dpp gradient in the developing wing imaginal disc, we constructed a biologically active Dpp-GFP fusion protein. Dpp is synthesized as a precursor protein that is proteolytically processed to produce a C-terminal fragment that functions in signaling. Adding GFP to the C terminus of the signaling fragment rendered Dpp inactive, so we inserted GFP near the N terminus of the signaling fragment of Dpp, downstream from the predicted proteolytic cleavage site (Figure 1A). To verify that Dpp-GFP is processed as predicted and secreted, Drosophila Schneider S2 cells were transfected with an inducible Dpp-GFP construct. Following induction, GFP-containing proteins were immunoprecipitated from cell lysates and from conditioned medium and visualized by immunoblotting. A secreted protein of the expected size was immunoprecipitated from conditioned medium (Figure 1B; 20 kda from Dpp 27 kda from GFP). A smaller amount of this protein was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates. Two larger proteins of 90 and 110 kda were precipitated from cell lysates. In disc lysates, the unprocessed precursor migrated at 110 kda and the 90 kda band was not observed (see Figure 3A). The unprocessed forms of Dpp-GFP were not secreted. Overexpression of Dpp-GFP in its endogenous domain with dpp GAL4 in a wild-type background causes imaginal disc overgrowth that is indistinguishable from Dpp-GFP Forms an Extracellular Gradient The Dpp-GFP protein gradient was examined by confo- cal fluorescence microscopy in wing imaginal discs. Figure 2A shows an optical section of a live wing disc expressing Dpp-GFP under control of dpp GAL4. Fluorescence intensity levels are highest in the central region of the disc where Dpp is produced and appear to form a broad shallow gradient on both sides. Note the punctate appearance of Dpp-GFP. The brightness of these spots as well as the number of spots per unit area decrease with distance from the source of Dpp. A plot of the

Dpp Gradient Formation 973 Figure 2. The Dpp-GFP Gradient (A) Live wing disc expressing UAS-Dpp-GFP under dpp GAL4 control imaged by confocal microscopy. (B) Wing disc expressing UAS-Dpp-GFP under dpp GAL4 control (green) fixed and stained for Ci protein (red) to label the anterior compartment. While Dpp-GFP fluorescence can be detected across the entire width of the wing pouch in live tissue; the signal is less strong in fixed preparations. (C) Upper panel: Dpp-GFP expression in the dorsal compartment from (B), shown alone. Lower panel: Intensity profiles of the dorsal compartment from (B). Red trace, Ci; green trace, GFP. Dpp-GFP forms a shallow gradient. (D) Intensity profile for the wing disc in (A), indicating fluorescence intensity along the AP axis. The signal to noise ratio is much better for the unfixed disc. (E) Optical section of a dpp GAL4 UAS-Dpp-GFP wing disc. a, anterior; p, posterior. The dashed line indicates the position of the optical cross-section shown in (F). (F) Optical cross-section showing Dpp-GFP outlining the cell surface and in punctate spots. Dpp-GFP is uniform along the apical-basolateral axis (top is apical). Lower panel shows a false-color fluorescence intensity map of the top panel, with white denoting highest fluorescence intensity and black lowest intensity. The diffuse, membrane-associated fluorescence and the number of brighter punctate spots decrease with distance from the source. fluorescence intensity profile for this disc is shown in the htfr and Tkv channels separately), suggesting that Figure 2D. Figure 2B shows an optical section of a similar the spots of Tkv represent receptor internalization via the disc, fixed and labeled with antibody to Ci protein to endocytic pathway. These observations suggest that mark the anterior compartment. A plot of fluorescence the punctate spots of Dpp-GFP may reflect ligand inter- intensity showed that Dpp-GFP levels were highest in nalized by receptor-mediated endocytosis. We note that the dpp GAL4 -expressing cells on the anterior side of the overlap is difficult to detect because Dpp-GFP levels compartment boundary (Figure 2C). In optical cross- are low in the lateral region of the disc where Tkv levels sections of a fixed sample, Dpp-GFP was observed in are higher. punctate spots within the epithelium as well as more In addition to the bright spots of internalized Dppdiffusely distributed over the surface of the cells (Figures GFP, GFP fluorescence was seen in a diffuse pattern 2E and 2F). In cross-section it is possible to see that the outlining the cells (Figures 2C and 3B). This may reflect intensity of surface-associated label also decreased with surface-associated extracellular Dpp-GFP, but we note distance from the source (Figure 2F, lower panel, red). that this cannot be determined by fluorescence microscopy. To ask whether the bright spots of intracellular Dpp- To ask whether a significant fraction of Dpp-GFP GFP could represent protein concentrated in endocytic is extracellular, we took a biochemical approach. Intact vesicles, we compared their distribution with that of the wing discs were treated with proteinase K to digest Dpp receptor Thickveins (Tkv). Tkv protein levels are extracellular proteins and examined by immunoblotting high at the lateral edge of the wing pouch and lower in (Figure 4A). Digestion of Dpp-GFP was compared with the center (Figure 3A). Antibody to Tkv shows a diffuse, that of Fasciclin II, a membrane protein, and of tubulin, membrane-associated labeling. At higher magnification an abundant cytoplasmic protein. Fasciclin II was com- a punctate pattern of spots is also observed (Figures pletely digested while Tubulin was essentially unaffected 3B 3E). Approximately one-third of the spots of Dpp- in whole disc lysates. Digestion of Dpp-GFP was GFP colocalize with Tkv. To ask whether the spots of monitored in immunoprecipitates of the same lysates. Tkv reflect endocytic vesicles, we used the human The amount of unprocessed 110 kda precursor did not Transferrin receptor (htfr) as a marker for endocytic change significantly upon treatment of wing discs with vesicles in Drosophila (Bretscher, 1996). Discs expressing proteinase K, indicating the unprocessed form of Dpp- htfr under control of en GAL4 were labeled with anti- GFP was not accessible to the protease. In contrast, htfr (Figure 3C, green) and anti-tkv antibodies (Figure most of the C-terminal signaling protein was digested, 3C, red). Most spots of Tkv colocalize with an htfr though a small amount could still be detected. These observations accumulation (Figures 3C 3E; panels [D] and [E] show indicate that most of the processed signaling

Cell 974 Figure 3. Thickveins Localization (A) Wild-type third instar wing disc stained with anti-tkv antibody. Thickveins is expressed more strongly laterally than centrally. Thickveins predominantly outlines the cells, but at higher magnification (C) can also be seen in spots. (B) Wing disc expressing UAS- Dpp-GFP under dpp GAL4 control (green) stained for Thickveins (red). Though Tkv spots are difficult to visualize in the central region of the disc due to low fluorescence intensity, roughly one third of Dpp-GFP spots colocalize with a Tkv accumulation. (C) Wing disc expressing UAS-hTfR under control of en-gal4 (green, and [D]) stained to reveal Thickveins localization (red, and [E]). Almost all Tkv spots colocalize with an accumulation of htfr, used as an endocytic marker. form of Dpp-GFP is extracellular. The protease-resistant fraction may reflect the fraction of Dpp-GFP in intracellular vesicles. If this is the case, the bright spots of internal- ized protein constitute a small fraction of the secreted Dpp-GFP in the disc. The larger fraction of extracellular Dpp-GFP is more difficult to visualize by microscopy, perhaps because its distribution is diffuse. Figure 4. Extracellular Dpp-GFP Is Unstable (A) Left panel: Immunoblot of GFP-containing proteins immunoprecipitated from intact wing discs. Lane 1, 200 control discs; lanes 2 and 3, 200 dpp GAL4 UAS-Dpp-GFP discs each. Discs in lane 3 were digested with proteinase K to digest extracellular proteins. Discs in lanes 1 and 2 were mock digested. GFP-containing proteins were immunoprecipitated with rabbit anti-gfp and blots were probed with mouse anti-gfp. Cross-reaction with the IgG band from the immunoprecipitating antibody is indicated. M: size markers. The precursor form of Dpp was not digested (pro-form). Dpp-GFP pro- tein was digested to near background levels. Right panel: Immunoblot of whole disc lysates from the samples in lanes 2 and 3 were probed with anti-tubulin, to monitor digestion of intracellular proteins, and with anti-fasciclin II to monitor digestion of cell surface proteins. (B) Immunoblots of intact wing discs expressing Dpp-GFP probed with anti-fasciclin II, anti-wingless, or anti-gfp. Discs were surface-biotinylated to tag extracellular proteins and then cultured at 25 C for either 0 or 3 hr. Biotinylated proteins were recovered by binding to Streptavidin-agarose beads. spots of intracellular Dpp-GFP reflect protein targeted Secreted Dpp-GFP Is Rapidly Turned Over to the lysosome for degradation. Use of a pulse chase To gauge the stability of extracellular Dpp-GFP, we permethod to monitor Dpp-GFP turnover requires that discs formed a pulse chase experiment in the wing disc. Inbe cultured briefly. We cannot exclude the possibility tact wing discs expressing Dpp-GFP in the endogenous that the properties of Dpp-GFP in cultured discs may domain were biotinylated on ice to label cell surface and differ from those in the intact larva. However, we note extracellular proteins. Discs were cultured for 3 hr to that Wg behaves comparably in both situations. allow turnover of labeled proteins, or lysed immediately. Biotinylated proteins were recovered by binding to streptavidin beads and examined by immunoblotting The Dpp Gradient Forms Rapidly (Figure 4B). Fasciclin II levels decreased little during the The Dpp-GFP gradient that we observed in the living 3 hr chase period. Wingless levels were considerably wing disc reflects a dynamic balance between the rates reduced, in agreement with previous reports that secreted of ligand turnover and production. The observation that Wingless is turned over rapidly in the wing disc Dpp-GFP is unstable therefore predicts that the rate of (Cadigan et al., 1998; Strigini and Cohen, 2000). Dpp- ligand movement through the tissue should be relatively GFP protein was reduced to nearly undetectable levels fast. To examine the rate of Dpp gradient formation, we during the 3 hr chase period, indicating that secreted made use of a temperature-sensitive mutation in the Dpp-GFP is rapidly turned over in cultured discs. Dpp- hedgehog gene, which allows dpp synthesis to be reversibly GFP was not recovered from the culture medium, suggesting blocked. Previous studies have shown that dpp- that it was degraded, and not shed from the lacz expression is removed by raising hh ts2 larvae at discs into the culture medium. It is possible that some 29 C for 24 hr (Strigini and Cohen, 1997). This treatment

Dpp Gradient Formation 975 Figure 5. Time Course of Dpp Gradient Formation Wing imaginal discs labeled with anti-pmad (white) and anti- Gal to visualize dpp-lacz expression. Hours recovery indicates time after the shift to the permissive temperature to reactivate Hh and allow new synthesis of Dpp at which larvae were sampled. The low level of pmad labeling in the pouch at 0 hr recovery indicates that a low level of Dpp signaling activity remained, even though dpp-lacz expression was undetectable. By 2 hr recovery, p-mad staining was seen over a few cell diameters in the posterior compartment. By 4 hr, pmad was seen at somewhat reduced levels in an almost normal-sized domain, although dpp-lacz expression was still not detectable. By 7 hr dpp-lacz expression was detected and pmad staining was essentially fully recovered. 7A and 7B). Conversely, when the P compartment was decreased in size by expression of the dominant-nega- tive form of PI3K the width of the Spalt domain in the posterior was considerably decreased (Figure 6C). Plots of Spalt fluorescence intensity are shown below the discs to facilitate comparison of the relative width of the domain in A and P compartments. To allow a more quantitative comparison of the effect of tissue growth on the shape of the Dpp activity gradient, we measured the width of the Spalt domain in the P compartment as a fraction of the total Spalt domain. The normalized width of the posterior expression do- main was plotted as a function of normalized P compartment width. This allowed us to compare several discs of each type and to correct for differences in absolute disc size. The normalized width of the Spalt domain in the P compartment showed a strong correlation with compartment size (Figure 6D, correlation coefficient 0.93). This indicates that the shape of the Dpp activity gradient as reflected by the Spalt expression domain adjusts to the size of the compartment. Like Dpp-GFP, Wingless protein has been shown to be unstable and to spread quickly through tissue (Stri- gini and Cohen, 2000). In a similar set of experiments, we assessed size compensation for the Wingless gradient. The shape of the Wingless activity gradient was mea- sured using Distal-less expression in discs where the dorsal compartment was increased or decreased in size by expression of PI3K variants under control of the dorsal GAL4 driver MS1096. The size of the Distal-less do- main showed a weaker correlation with compartment size (Figure 6F; correlation coefficient 0.76), sug- gesting that the Wingless activity gradient does not compensate for size differences as effectively as the Dpp gradient. results in almost complete loss of Dpp signaling activity in the wing disc, as visualized by the low level pmad labeling in the center of the wing disc (Figure 5, 0 hr recovery). Larvae were shifted back to the permissive temperature to restore hh activity and the time course of pmad gradient formation was monitored. Increased pmad staining was detected by 2 hr recovery, before the appearance of detectable levels of dpp-lacz reporter gene expression. By 4 hr, pmad staining was seen in a symmetric domain of nearly normal size, though at a reduced level. Between 7 and 24 hr, pmad staining returned to normal levels. These observations suggest that Dpp spreads rapidly through the tissue. Although we cannot accurately estimate the time required for recovery of hh activity and for new synthesis, processing, and secretion of Dpp protein, we infer that Dpp gradient formation requires less than 4 hr. Accommodation of Pattern to Compartment Size The results presented thus far suggest that Dpp forms a high-throughput gradient. On this basis we would expect tissue growth rate to have little direct effect on ligand movement. Yet, manipulation of growth rates can produce anterior and posterior compartments of differ- ent size with a normal complement of pattern elements along the AP axis. To examine how this occurs, we made use of transgenes expressing constitutively active or dominant negative forms of PI3-kinase (Leevers et al., 1996). Overexpression of an activated form of PI3K causes tissue overgrowth whereas overexpression of a dominant-negative form causes tissue undergrowth. In a wild-type disc, the Spalt domain is centered on the Dpp expression domain. Excluding the Dpp-expressing domain, the extent of the Spalt domain is roughly equal in A and P compartments (Figure 6B). Using en GAL4 to direct expression of UAS-Dp110-CAAX in the P compartment of the wing disc caused considerable overgrowth of the compartment. Concurrently, the width of the Spalt domain in the P compartment increased relative to the A compartment (Figure 6A). Clones of cells expressing UAS-Dp110-CAAX were not able to induce ectopic Spalt expression outside the endogenous Spalt domain, indicating that expansion of the Spalt domain seen in en GAL4 UAS-Dp110-CAAX wing discs was not due to increased sensitivity of P cells to Dpp (Figures Size Accommodation Occurs by Spatial Regulation of Dpp Signaling Activity Size accommodation is reflected in the expression of target genes like Spalt. To ask whether this occurs at the level of target gene regulation or at an earlier stage by regulating Dpp signaling activity, we made use of anti-pmad to visualize the level of Dpp signaling activity in discs undergoing size accommodation. SMAD proteins are phosphorylated by type II receptors upon ligand bind-

Cell 976 Figure 6. The Dpp Activity Gradient Accommodates to Differences in Disc Size Wing discs labeled for Spalt protein (red). Engrailed (green) marks the P compartment. PI3K transgene expression was visualized by the Myc epitope tag (blue). The dip in the level of Spalt expression in the center of the disc is due to Hedgehog activity and coincides with the stripe of Dpp-expressing cells (Tanimoto et al., 2000). Intensity profiles of the Spalt domain are shown below in red. Double-headed arrows indicate the width of the Spalt domain in the P compartment. (A) en GAL4 UAS-Dp110-CAAX wing disc, expressing the activated form of PI3K. Note the relative increase in the range of Spalt activation in the P compartment. en GAL4 is also active in anterior cells and causes some local overgrowth near the compartment boundary at late stages. (B) Wild-type disc. (C) en GAL4 UAS-Dp110-D954A wing disc, expressing the dominant-negative form of PI3K. Note the reduced range of Spalt activation in the P compartment. The wing pouch extended further than the Spalt domain, so the size of the wing pouch was not limiting. (D) Plot of normalized Spalt expression (Y axis) versus normalized posterior compartment size for wild-type, en GAL4 UAS-Dp110-CAAX, and en GAL4 UAS-Dp110-D954A wing discs. The size of the Spalt domain showed a strong correlation with posterior compartment size. (Correlation coefficient r 0.93). (E) Plot of normalized nuclear pmad (Y axis) versus normalized posterior compartment size as in (D). Discs were from a separate experiment. (Correlation coefficient r 0.94). (F) Plot of normalized dorsal Dll expression (Y axis) versus normalized dorsal compartment size as in (D). The size of the Dll domain correlates less well with D compartment size (Correlation coefficient r 0.76). ing. Phosphorylated receptor-activated SMAD proteins MAD phosphorylation, or could reflect modulation of associate with a Co-SMAD and translocate to the nucleus Dpp receptor activity levels. (reviewed by Massague and Chen, 2000). As there Changes in receptor activity levels could be caused are no other transducers of Dpp signaling known, nuclear by growth-dependent changes in receptor expression pmad levels can be taken to reflect the intensity levels. We have examined Tkv expression in discs un- of Dpp signal transduction activity (Tanimoto et al., dergoing size accommodation. Expression of activated 2000). As observed for Spalt, the size of the posterior or dominant-negative PI3K in the posterior compartment pmad domain showed a high correlation to the size of with en GAL4 does not change the relative level of the posterior compartment (Figure 6E; correlation coeffi- receptor between A and P compartments (not shown). cient 0.94). Enlarging the size of the posterior compartment This suggests that receptor levels are not responsible extended the domain of pmad staining while for the alteration in activity. However, Tkv is transcrip- decreasing the size of the posterior compartment reduced tionally repressed by Dpp signaling (Lecuit and Cohen, the domain of pmad. The finding that the size 1998), so its expression profile accommodates to altered of the pmad domain correlates with compartment size compartment size in a manner similar to that of the other suggests that size accommodation occurs at the level of Dpp target gene Spalt. MAD phosphorylation, which reflects signaling activity. brinker has been identified as a repressor of Dpp This could reflect a direct modulation of the stability of target gene expression (Campbell and Tomlinson, 1999;

Dpp Gradient Formation 977 (Morata and Ripoll, 1975). We therefore assumed that clones of rapidly growing cells would not perturb the Dpp activity gradient. To address this, we examined the effects of large clones of cells overexpressing activated PI3K. Figures 7E and 7F show an example of a PI3K- CAAX clone that comprised a large fraction of the P compartment. The clone straddled the boundary of the Spalt domain. If size compensation were a local property of the clone, we would have expected the border of the Spalt domain to shift posteriorly within the clone, further from the Dpp source. Instead, the Spalt domain was not noticeably affected. This confirms the expectation that size accommodation is a property of compartments. Ligand versus Activity Gradients Wing discs in which Dpp-GFP has replaced endogenous Dpp provide an opportunity to simultaneously visualize Dpp ligand levels and receptor (Tkv) levels. Using pmad we can also visualize the level of receptor activation. Figure 8A shows a dpp d8 /dpp d12 wing disc expressing Dpp-GFP under control of dpp GAL4 and stained to visualize pmad and Tkv levels. The expression profiles of the three proteins are compared in Figure 8B. As reported previously, pmad levels are low in the Dpp-expression domain and show an abrupt increase in adjacent A and P cells. The decrease in pmad levels has been attributed to reduced thickveins expression due to transcriptional repression in response to Hedgehog signaling (Tanimoto et al., 2000). Outside of this central region, comparison of Tkv protein levels and pmad shows that the level of receptor shows a limited correlation with activity levels. The pmad profile forms a plateau in both A and P compartments. The pmad plateau is narrower in the P compartment, presumably due to the elevated level of Tkv (see also Tanimoto et al., 2000). Elevated levels of Tkv have been suggested to limit the range of Dpp movement in the disc (Lecuit and Cohen, 1998). This effect can be visualized by comparing the slope of the Dpp-GFP gradient in A and P compartments, which dif- fer in the level of Tkv expression in the mature third instar disc. We averaged the images of four discs expressing Dpp-GFP and analyzed the fluorescence intensity profile along the AP axis (Figure 8C). The slope of the anterior Dpp-GFP gradient is 1.3 while the slope in the posterior is 2.0. This difference in slopes can also be seen directly in Figures 8C and 2D. More striking, however, is the finding that other fea- tures of the pmad distribution profile do not correlate well with either ligand or receptor levels. The level of nuclear pmad decreases sharply at the end of the plateau in both compartments. The shape of the pmad profile correlates extremely well with the Spalt domain. Large changes in pmad and Spalt levels occur over distances in which there are relatively small changes in the level of ligand or receptor. Thus, the shapes of the ligand and activity gradients differ considerably. This suggests a requirement for other modulators of Dpp signaling activity that act at the level of receptor activa- tion or pmad phosphorylation. We note that size accommodation occurs at the level of pmad phosphorylation, and may reflect this additional layer of regulation. Figure 7. Effects of Dp110-CAAX and Brinker Overexpression on Spalt and pmad Levels (A and B) Wing disc with clones of cells overexpressing activated PI3K (myc-dp110-caax, green) stained with anti-spalt antibody (red and [B]). Cells expressing activated PI3K do not show altered sensitivity to Dpp signaling. (C and D) A wing disc containing a clone of cells overexpressing Brinker (outlined in green), shows reduced Spalt levels (C) but not pmad levels (D) within the clone. (E and F) The edge of the Spalt domain (red and [F]) is not locally extended further from the Dpp source by the presence of a large clone of cells overexpressing activated PI3K (myc-dp110-caax, green). Jazwinska et al., 1999; Minami et al., 1999). brinker is expressed laterally in the wing disc and its expression is repressed by Dpp signaling. To ask if repression medi- ated by Brinker could have an effect on size accommodation, we generated clones of cells in the wing disc overexpressing Brinker and examined Spalt and pmad levels (Figures 7C and 7D). In agreement with previous studies, Brinker overexpression represses Spalt; how- ever, we find that Brinker expression does not de- tectably affect levels of MAD phosphorylation (Figure 7D). Brinker expression also does not perturb Thickvein levels (not shown). These observations indicate that tar- get gene regulation can be uncoupled from the level of signaling activity in the cell. Compartment size appears to correlate strongly with Dpp signaling activity, reflected by MAD phosphorylation (Figure 6E). Previous studies using Minute mutations have sug- gested that clones of cells with different relative growth rates do not perturb patterning within a compartment

Cell 978 Figure 8. Comparison of Dpp-GFP Ligand and Activity Gradients (A) Portion of a dpp D8 /dpp D12 wing disc expressing UAS-Dpp-GFP under dpp GAL4 control (green) labeled for pmad (blue) and Thickveins (red). (B) Fluorescence intensity profiles of (A). (C) Dpp-GFP fluorescence intensity profile along the AP axis for four wing discs expressing UAS- Dpp-GFP under dpp GAL4 control, averaged together to reduce noise. Dpp-GFP levels drop off more quickly in the posterior compartment (slope 2.00) compared to the anterior (slope 1.28). Discussion then drops off abruptly. This abrupt transition in pmad levels does not coincide with abrupt changes in either Ligand Gradient Formation Dpp ligand or Tkv receptor levels. This observation sug- Our results provide evidence for an extracellular gradi- gests that additional factors contribute to shaping the ent of secreted Dpp-GFP that spreads across the wing activity gradient. Possible modulators include the inhibidisc and signals directly to distant cells. The kinetic tory SMAD (Dad) which is induced by Dpp signaling properties of the Dpp gradient are similar to those of (Tsuneizumi et al., 1997), other Dpp receptors (for examthe Wingless gradient (Strigini and Cohen, 2000) both ple Saxophone; Haerry et al., 1998), or the levels of the ligands are unstable and spread quickly across the wing adaptor protein SARA (Tsukazaki et al., 1998). Alternadisc. How are the ligand gradients formed? Possibilities tively, abrupt transitions are seen when reactions are include (1) movement by attachment to the cell surface cooperative. For instance, Dpp receptor binding may be or the extracellular matrix, (2) active transport, and (3) cooperative, or Tkv phosphorylation of MAD may require diffusion. Our results now rule out the model of Dpp spreading as a result of tissue growth. Cells in the wing a cooperative step such as receptor clustering. disc divide on average every 8 hr (González-Gaitán et al., 1994). Our observations indicate that most of the Accommodation of Pattern to Tissue Size secreted Dpp protein would be degraded within that Our results show that the Dpp activity gradient has a time. Also, Dpp moves rapidly through the wing disc remarkable ability to compensate for altered compart- relative to the rate of tissue growth. ment size. Compartments can differ by almost a factor Two modes of active transport have been considered. of two in size and yet contain all normal pattern elements A possible function for cytonemes might be to transport (Figure 5 and Goberdhan et al., 1999; Verdu et al., 1999). Dpp from the center of the disc to distant cells (Ramirez- Over a broad range of compartment sizes Dpp activity Weber and Kornberg, 1999). Cytonemes are located in levels are maximal in the center of the disc and minimal the lumen of the disc, which corresponds to the apical at the edge of the compartment. side of the epithelium. We note that Dpp-GFP is not Since adult wings of different sizes are normally patconcentrated on the apical side of the wing disc epithe- terned, it was expected that the Dpp patterning system lium, as might be expected if cytonemes were involved would adjust for different tissue sizes at some point in in Dpp transport. Our observations suggest that most development. Our results show that size compensation of the Dpp-GFP is basolateral. It has also been proposed occurs remarkably early in the Dpp signal transduction that receptor-mediated endocytosis plays a role in Dpp cascade, at the level of receptor activation. Presumably, gradient formation (González-Gaitán and Jäckle, 1999). this may result in a continuous coordination between According to this view, cells would transport Dpp by tissue size and patterning. This also suggests that regurepeated cycles of endocytosis and resecretion. Cololators of Dpp target gene expression, such as Brinker, calization of Tkv with an endocytic marker suggests that are not responsible for size accommodation, but rather these spots of Tkv represent endocytic vesicles. Thus, that levels of the Dpp upstream signaling compothe spots of Dpp-GFP could reflect intermediates in the transport process. Alternatively, these vesicles might reflect Dpp targeted for intracellular degradation. With the caveat that both Dpp-GFP and Tkv spots are difficult to visualize, the fact that some Dpp-GFP accumulations colocalize with a Tkv spot and some do not might reflect segregation of a recycling receptor and a ligand destined for degradation. Our data do not allow us to distinguish between endocytosis-mediated transport and Figure 9. Diagram Illustrating the Shape of the Dpp Activity Gradient movement through the extracellular space by diffusion. in Compartments of Different Size Cells A and B are equidistant from the source of Dpp. Cell A is in the Shape of the Dpp Activity Gradient rapidly growing compartment. Cell B is in the more slowly growing The Dpp activity gradient gauged by MAD phosphoryla- compartment. Consequently, the two cells experience different levels tion forms a plateau in both A and P compartments and of Dpp signaling activity.

Dpp Gradient Formation 979 nents Dpp, Tkv, SARA, Dad, and MAD sense and Cell Culture adjust their levels to compartment size. Drosophila Schneider S2 cells were transiently transfected with 3 g of Dpp-GFP DNA per well in 6-well plates using Lipofectin (Gibco). To examine this problem we consider the state of the Expression was induced by addition of 0.7 mm CuSO 4 for 2 days. Dpp activity gradient in two cells that are equidistant Conditioned medium was collected and cells were harvested for from the Dpp source in compartments that are growing immunoprecipitation. Cells were lysed in 50 mm Tris ph 7.5, 150 mm at different rates (Figure 9). Our results show it is possi- NaCl, 1% Triton X100 and protease inhibitors (Boehringer, complete) ble for cell A in the larger, faster growing compartment, and immunoprecipitated using Rabbit anti-gfp. to have high levels of MAD phosphorylation while cell B does not. There are two differences between cells A Antibodies Anti-Ci (Schwartz et al., 1995); anti-pmad PS1 (Persson et al., and B that can be used to suggest models for how this 1998); anti-wingless (Brook and Cohen, 1996); anti-fasciclin II (Lin might be accomplished. (1) Cell A belongs to a faster and Goodman, 1994); anti-dll (Wu and Cohen, 1999); anti-engrailed growing cell population than cell B. If the rate of cell 4D9 (Patel et al., 1989); anti-tubulin (Sigma); rabbit anti-c-myc growth and division could influence how quickly cells (Santa Cruz); mouse anti-gfp (Clontech). Rat anti-spalt was raised change their responsiveness to Dpp signaling, the rate against the 134 C-terminal amino acids of Spalt as described by of growth might be able to affect the shape of the activity (Kuhnlein et al., 1994). Rat anti-thickveins was raised against the gradient. However, we find that the presence of a large intracellular domain of Tkv. clone of quickly growing cells does not locally perturb Disc Manipulations the Dpp activity gradient suggesting that growth rate For protease treatment, wing imaginal discs were dissected in iceper se is not responsible for size accommodation. (2) cold PBS and processed as described in Strigini and Cohen, 2000. Cell B is closer to the lateral edge of the disc than cell For surface biotinylation, wing imaginal discs were dissected in cold A. If we assume that the edge of the disc provides a PBS and incubated for 20 min in cold PBS containing 1 mg/ml Sulfosink with a high capacity to degrade or inactivate Dpp, NHS-LC-Biotin (Pierce). Biotinylation was quenched by incubating cell B will experience a lower level of Dpp than cell A cells with ice-cold PBS containing 100 mm glycine for 25 min. Discs were washed in PBS and lysed in PBS containing 2% NP-40, 0.2% despite being equidistant from the source. If Thickveins SDS, and protease inhibitors. The lysate was cleared by centrifugais involved in Dpp downregulation, the high level in lat- tion and biotinylated proteins were recovered by binding to Streperal cells might facilitate removal of Dpp by receptor- tavidin-agarose beads (Pierce) overnight at 4 C. Beads were washed mediated endocytosis. thickveins has already been and proteins recovered in SDS-PAGE sample buffer. shown to limit the effective range of Dpp in the disc (Lecuit and Cohen, 1998), and we see a correlation be- Intensity Profiles tween higher Tkv levels in the posterior and a steeper Intensity profiles were generated by NIH Image software. Images were copied from Adobe Photoshop into NIH Image. Average inten- Dpp-GFP gradient. For this mechanism to work we must sity for each image was measured using the plot function. For multiassume that Dpp is not able to downregulate Thickveins channel images, individual channels were measured separately and laterally. The lateral sink need not degrade Dpp. Other the plots overlaid using Adobe Photoshop. For Figures 2A and 8, mechanisms for removing Dpp activity laterally could the entire wing pouch was measured; for Figures 2B and 2C the involve secreted antagonists. dorsal compartment was measured; for Figure 6 a narrow stripe just It has previously been shown that expression of Dpp dorsal of the DV boundary was measured. Measurements of Dll target genes spreads slowly around Dpp-expressing domain width were done in the middle of the posterior compartment. clones in the lateral regions of the wing disc (Lecuit and Cohen, 1998). At the time this was proposed to reflect Acknowledgments slow movement of Dpp ligand due to high levels of Thomas Lecuit made the initial observations that the Spalt expresreceptor expression. Our current observations indicate sion domain scaled according to compartment size. His ideas about that Dpp can, in principle, move rapidly. According to tissue growth and gradients have made an important contribution one model, the slow spread of target gene induction in to our thinking about this project, for which we gratefully acknowl- the lateral region might reflect the time required for Dppreview of the manuscript. We thank Leonie Ringrose for constructing edge him. We thank Thomas Lecuit and Pernille Rørth for critical dependent downregulation of the repressor Brinker in the Dpp-GFP fusion, Ann-Mari Voie for producing transgenic flies, tissue surrounding the clones. Alternatively, it might re- and S. Leevers, E. Karsenti, R. Schuh, and C. Heldin for reagents. flect the time needed to accumulate sufficient Dpp in a A. A. T. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute predoctoral fellow region where Dpp is rapidly inactivated or cleared from and a Beinecke scholar. the disc. Received June 16, 2000; revised October 16, 2000. Experimental Procedures References Dpp-GFP GFP coding sequences were introduced in frame after amino acid Böhni, R., Riesgo-Escovar, J., Oldham, S., Brogiolo, W., Stocker, H., 833 of Dpp (cdna e5). GFP was amplified by PCR from pegfp-n1 Andruss, B.F., Beckingham, K., and Hafen, E. (1999). Autonomous (Clontech) with AvrII sites introduced before and after the open control of cell and organ size by CHICO, a Drosophila homolog of reading frame to facilitate cloning the PCR product in frame with vertebrate IRS1-4. Cell 97, 865 875. the dpp coding sequences. The sequence at the fusion junction is Bretscher, M.S. (1996). Expression and changing distribution of the KNHDDLG (GFP) LGTCRR. Dpp sequences are underlined. The Dpphuman transferrin receptor in developing Drosophila oocytes and GFP gene fusion was cloned into prmha3 for expression in Droembryos. J. Cell Sci. 109, 3113 3119. sophila Schneider S2 cells and into puast for expression in Drosophila. Brook, W.J., and Cohen, S.M. (1996). Antagonistic interactions be- tween Wingless and Decapentaplegic responsible for dorsal-ventral Drosophila Strains pattern in the Drosophila leg. Science 273, 1373 1377. Strains for expression of activated and dominant-negative PI3K Cadigan, K.M., Fish, M.P., Rulifson, E.J., and Nusse, R. (1998). Wing- UAS-DP110CAAX and UAS-DP110 D954A are described in (Leevers less repression of Drosophila frizzled 2 expression shapes the Winget al., 1996). hedgehog ts2 is described in (Ma et al., 1993). less morphogen gradient in the wing. Cell 93, 767 777.

Cell 980 Campbell, G., and Tomlinson, A. (1999). Transducing the Dpp mor- ysis of cubitus interruptus regulation in Drosophila embryos and phogen gradient in the wing of Drosophila: regulation of Dpp targets imaginal discs. Development 121, 1625 1635. by brinker. Cell 96, 553 562. Strigini, M., and Cohen, S.M. (1997). A Hedgehog activity gradient Goberdhan, D.C., Paricio, N., Goodman, E.C., Mlodzik, M., and Wilment 124, 4697 4705. contributes to AP axial patterning of the Drosophila wing. Developson, C. (1999). Drosophila tumor suppressor PTEN controls cell size and number by antagonizing the Chico/PI3-kinase signaling Strigini, M., and Cohen, S.M. (2000). Wingless gradient formation in pathway. Genes Dev. 13, 3244 3258. the Drosophila wing. Curr. Biol. 10, 293 300. González-Gaitán, M., and Jäckle, H. (1999). The range of spalt- Tanimoto, H., Itoh, S., ten Dijke, P., and Tabata, T. (2000). Hedgehog activating Dpp signalling is reduced in endocytosis-defective Dro- creates a gradient of DPP activity in Drosophila wing imaginal discs. sophila wing discs. Mech. Dev. 87, 143 151. Mol. Cell 5, 59 71. González-Gaitán, M., Paz Capdevila, M., and García-Bellido, A. Tsukazaki, T., Chiang, T.A., Davison, A.F., Attisano, L., and Wrana, (1994). Cell proliferation patterns in the wing imaginal disc of Dro- J.L. (1998). SARA, a FYVE domain protein that recruits Smad2 to sophila. Mech. Dev. 40, 183 200. the TGFbeta receptor. Cell 95, 779 791. Haerry, T.E., Khalsa, O., O Connor, M.B., and Wharton, K.A. (1998). Tsuneizumi, K., Nakayama, T., Kamoshida, Y., Kornberg, T.B., Chris- Synergistic signaling by two BMP ligands through the SAX and tian, J.L., and Tabata, T. (1997). Daughters against dpp modulates TKV receptors controls wing growth and patterning in Drosophila. dpp organizing activity in Drosophila wing development. Nature 389, Development 125, 3977 3987. 627 631. Jazwinska, A., Kirov, N., Wieschaus, E., Roth, S., and Rushlow, C. Verdu, J., Buratovich, M.A., Wilder, E.L., and Birnbaum, M.J. (1999). (1999). The Drosophila gene brinker reveals a novel mechanism of Cell-autonomous regulation of cell and organ growth in Drosophila Dpp target gene regulation. Cell 96, 563 573. by Akt/PKB. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 500 506. Kuhnlein, R.P., Frommer, G., Friedrich, M., Gonzalez-Gaitan, M., Weigmann, K., and Cohen, S.M. (1999). Lineage tracing cells born Weber, A., Wagner-Bernholz, J.F., Gehring, W.J., Jäckle, H., and in different domains along the PD axis of the developing Drosophila Schuh, R. (1994). spalt encodes an evolutionarily conserved zinc leg. Development 126, 3823 3830. finger protein of novel structure which provides homeotic gene func- Weinkove, D., and Leevers, S.J. (2000). The genetic control of organ tion in the head and tail region of the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. growth: insights from Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 75 80. 13, 168 179. Weinkove, D., Neufeld, T.P., Twardzik, T., Waterfield, M.D., and Lecuit, T., and Cohen, S.M. (1998). Dpp receptor levels contribute Leevers, S.J. (1999). Regulation of imaginal disc cell size, cell to shaping the Dpp morphogen gradient in the Drosophila wing number and organ size by Drosophila class I(A) phosphoinositide imaginal disc. Development 125, 4901 4907. 3-kinase and its adaptor. Curr. Biol. 9, 1019 1029. Lecuit, T., Brook, W.J., Ng, M., Calleja, M., Sun, H., and Cohen, Wu, J., and Cohen, S.M. (1999). Proximal distal axis formation in S.M. (1996). Two distinct mechanisms for long-range patterning by the Drosophila leg: primary subdivision into proximal and distal Decapentaplegic in the Drosophila wing. Nature 381, 387 393. domains by Homothorax, Teashirt and Distal-less expression. Development 126, 109 117. Leevers, S.J., Weinkove, D., MacDougall, L.K., Hafen, E., and Waterfield, M.D. (1996). The Drosophila phosphoinositide 3-kinase Zecca, M., Basler, K., and Struhl, G. (1996). Direct and long-range Dp110 promotes cell growth. EMBO J. 15, 6584 6594. action of a Wingless morphogen gradient. Cell 87, 833 844. Lin, D.M., and Goodman, C.S. (1994). Ectopic and increased expression of Fasciclin II alters motoneuron growth cone guidance. Neuron 13, 507 523. Ma, C., Zhou, Y., Beachy, P., and Moses, K. (1993). The segment polarity gene hedgehog is required for progression of the morphogenetic furrow in the developing Drosophila eye. Cell 75, 927 938. Massague, J., and Chen, Y.G. (2000). Controlling TGF-beta signaling. Genes Dev. 14, 627 644. Minami, M., Kinoshita, N., Kamoshida, Y., Tanimoto, H., and Tabata, T. (1999). brinker is a target of Dpp in Drosophila that negatively regulates Dpp-dependent genes. Nature 398, 242 246. Montagne, J., Stewart, M.J., Stocker, H., Hafen, E., Kozma, S.C., and Thomas, G. (1999). Drosophila S6 kinase: a regulator of cell size. Science 285, 2126 2129. Morata, G., and Ripoll, P. (1975). Minutes: mutants of Drosophila autonomously affecting cell division rate. Dev. Biol. 42, 211 221. Nellen, D., Burke, R., Struhl, G., and Basler, K. (1996). Direct and long-range action of a DPP morphogen gradient. Cell 85, 357 368. Neumann, C.J., and Cohen, S.M. (1997). Long-range action of Wingless organizes the dorsal-ventral axis of the Drosophila wing. Development 124, 871 880. Patel, N.H., Martin-Blanco, E., Coleman, K.G., Poole, S.J., Ellis, M.C., Kornberg, T.B., and Goodman, C.S. (1989). Expression of engrailed proteins in Arthropods, Annelids, and Chordates. Cell 58, 955 968. Persson, U., Izumi, H., Souchelnytskyi, S., Itoh, S., Grimsby, S., Engstrom, U., Heldin, C.H., Funa, K., and ten Dijke, P. (1998). The L45 loop in type I receptors for TGF-beta family members is a critical determinant in specifying Smad isoform activation. FEBS Lett. 434, 83 87. Ramirez-Weber, F.A., and Kornberg, T.B. (1999). Cytonemes: cellular processes that project to the principal signaling center in Drosophila imaginal discs. Cell 97, 599 607. Schwartz, C., Locke, J., Nishida, C., and Kornberg, T.B. (1995). Anal-