Abel-Grassmann s bands. 1. Introduction

Similar documents
arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 25 May 2013

SANDWICH SETS AND CONGRUENCES IN COMPLETELY INVERSE AG -GROUPOIDS

Some Structural Properties of AG-Groups

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 5 Oct 2015

A note on an Abel-Grassmann's 3-band. 1. Introduction

DECOMPOSITION OF LOCALLY ASSOCIATIVE Γ-AG-GROUPOIDS 1

ON (m, n)-ideals OF AN ORDERED ABEL-GRASSMANN GROUPOID. Faisal Yousafzai, Asad Khan, and Aiyared Iampan

Left almost semigroups dened by a free algebra. 1. Introduction

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 20 Mar 2014

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 21 Feb 2014

Characterizations of Intra-Regular Left Almost Semigroups by Their Fuzzy Ideals

Factorization of weighted EP elements in C -algebras

SEMIRINGS SATISFYING PROPERTIES OF DISTRIBUTIVE TYPE

On relations between right alternative and nuclear square AG-groupoids

GS trapezoids in GS quasigroups

ON LALLEMENT S LEMMA 1

Some results on the reverse order law in rings with involution

STRUCTURAL THEOREMS FOR (m,n)-quasi-ideal SEMIGROUPS. Petar V. Protić. 1. Introduction and some general properties for (m, n)-quasi ideal semigroups

On Γ-Ideals and Γ-Bi-Ideals in Γ-AG-Groupoids

A Note on UNAR LA-Semigroup

Developing a Distributed Java-based Speech Recognition Engine

The Advanced Encryption Standard

arxiv: v2 [math.gr] 10 Feb 2015

GROUPS. Chapter-1 EXAMPLES 1.1. INTRODUCTION 1.2. BINARY OPERATION

EP elements and Strongly Regular Rings

Example. Addition, subtraction, and multiplication in Z are binary operations; division in Z is not ( Z).

arxiv: v3 [math.gr] 18 Aug 2011

CHAPTER 5 A BLOCK CIPHER INVOLVING A KEY APPLIED ON BOTH THE SIDES OF THE PLAINTEXT

On the lattice of congruences on a fruitful semigroup

On (m,n)-ideals in LA-Semigroups

Architecture and development methodology for Location Based Services

NAPOLEON S QUASIGROUPS

Regular Semigroups with Inverse Transversals

Profiling the International New Venture -A literature review of the empirical evidence

On Extensions of Green s Relations in Semi groups

Stojan Bogdanović and Miroslav Ćirić

Justification of Investment in IT systems

Congruences on Inverse Semigroups using Kernel Normal System

A P -THEOREM FOR INVERSE SEMIGROUPS WITH ZERO

SEMILATTICE CONGRUENCES VIEWED FROM QUASI-ORDERS

Secret Key Systems (block encoding) Encrypting a small block of text (say 64 bits) General considerations for cipher design:

Pentagonal quasigroups. 1. Introduction

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 7 Aug 2017

A B CDE F B FD D A C AF DC A F

REGULAR IDENTITIES IN LATTICES

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 16 Feb 2018

Basic Concepts of Group Theory

Strongly Regular Congruences on E-inversive Semigroups

DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATIC EDUCATION MATHEMATIC AND NATURAL SCIENCE FACULTY

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 26 Jun 2017

Semilattices of r-archimedean subdimonoids

The endomorphism semigroup of a free dimonoid of rank 1

On Regularity of Incline Matrices

Attempt QUESTIONS 1 and 2, and THREE other questions. Do not turn over until you are told to do so by the Invigilator.

INVERSE SEMIQUANDLES. Michael Kinyon. 4th Mile High, 2 August University of Lisbon. Department of Mathematics 1 / 21

Parts Manual. EPIC II Critical Care Bed REF 2031

The Idempotent Regular Elements of Semigroups

1. Groups Definitions

THE ENDOMORPHISM SEMIRING OF A SEMILATTICE

Introduction to Groups

ON HOW TO CONSTRUCT LEFT SEMIMODULES FROM THE RIGHT ONES

D EFB B E B EAB ABC DEF C A F C D C DEF C AD C AEC D D E C D EF B ABC AB CD A EFD AD D E

Attempt QUESTIONS 1 and 2, and THREE other questions. Do not turn over until you are told to do so by the Invigilator.

One-sided clean rings.

0809ge. Geometry Regents Exam Based on the diagram below, which statement is true?

On Uni-soft (Quasi) Ideals of AG-groupoids

Vladimir Volenec, Mea Bombardelli

Adequate and Ehresmann semigroups

Ring Theory Problem Set 2 Solutions

Anatolii V. Zhuchok SOME SEMILATTICE DECOMPOSITIONS OF DIMONOIDS

Moore-Penrose-invertible normal and Hermitian elements in rings

DOI: /auom An. Şt. Univ. Ovidius Constanţa Vol. 25(1),2017, ON BI-ALGEBRAS

Characterizations of Abel-Grassmann's Groupoids by Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals

CHARACTERIZATION OF IDEAL SEMIGROUPS OF INVERSE SEMIGROUPS. K.V.R.Srinivas

Ana Rita Garcia Alves. Semigroup Operators and Applications. Universidade do Minho Escola de Ciências. outubro de 2015

MTH 411 Lecture Notes Based on Hungerford, Abstract Algebra

VOL. 2, NO. 2, February 2012 ISSN ARPN Journal of Systems and Software AJSS Journal. All rights reserved

Radical decompositions of semiheaps

On EP elements, normal elements and partial isometries in rings with involution

Inner image-kernel (p, q)-inverses in rings

Drazin Invertibility of Product and Difference of Idempotents in a Ring

Cristina Nita-Rotaru. CS355: Cryptography. Lecture 9: Encryption modes. AES

Prove proposition 68. It states: Let R be a ring. We have the following

Module 2. Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures by the Matrix Force Method

International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 4, 2010, no. 2, S. Uma

New Coding System of Grid Squares in the Republic of Indonesia

Enumerating AG-Groups with a Study of Smaradache AG-Groups

ONESIDED INVERSES FOR SEMIGROUPS

Completely regular semigroups and (Completely) (E, H E )-abundant semigroups (a.k.a. U-superabundant semigroups): Similarities and Contrasts

Questions of Ethical Responsibility in the Research of Unaccompanied Minors

Commutative orders. David Easdown and Victoria Gould. December Abstract. A subsemigroup S of a semigroup Q is a left (right) order in Q if every

Varieties of P -restriction semigroups

An analytic proof of the theorems of Pappus and Desargues

Eves Equihoop, The Card Game SET, and Abstract SET

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths.

Semigroup, monoid and group models of groupoid identities. 1. Introduction

Improved S-Box Construction from Binomial Power Functions

Research Statement. MUHAMMAD INAM 1 of 5

Abel rings and super-strongly clean rings

2. ETALE GROUPOIDS MARK V. LAWSON

Transcription:

Quasigroups and Related Systems 11 (2004), 95 101 Abel-Grassmann s bands Petar V. Protić and Nebojša Stevanović Abstract Abel-Grassmann s groupoids or shortly AG-groupoids have been considered in a number of papers, although under the different names. In some papers they are named LA-semigroups [3] in others left invertive groupoids [2]. In this paper we deal with AG-bands, i.e., AG-groupoids whose all elements are idempotents. We introduce a few congruence relations on AG-band and consider decompositions of Abel-Grassmann s bands induced by these congruences. We also give the natural partial order on Abel- Grassmann s band. A groupoid S in which the following 1. Introduction ( a, b, c S) ab c = cb a, (1) is true is called an Abel-Grassmann s groupoid, [5]. It is easy to verify that in every AG-groupoid the medial law ab cd = ac bd holds. Abell-Grassmann s groupoids are not associative in general, however they have a close relation with semigroups and with commutative structures. Introducing a new operation on AG-groupoid makes it a commutative semigroup. On the other hand introducing a new operation on a commutative inverse semigroup turns it into an AG-groupoid. Abel-Grassmann s groupoid satisfying ( a, b, c S) ab c = b ca (called weak associative law in [4]) is an AG -groupoid. It is easy to prove that any AG -groupoid satisfies the permutation identity of a next type a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 = a π(1) a π(2) a π(3) a π(4), 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 20N02 Keywords: AG-groupoid, antirectangular AG-band, AG-band decompositions Supported by Grant 1379 of Ministry of Science through Math. Inst.SANU

96 P. V. Protić and N. Stevanović where π is any permutation on a set {1, 2, 3, 4}, [5]. Let (S, ) be AG-groupoid, a S be a fixed element. We can define the "sandwich" operation on S as follows: x y = xa y, x, y S. It is easy to verify that x y = y x for any x, y S, in other words (S, ) is a commutative groupoid. If S is AG -groupoid and x, y, z S are arbitrary elements, then and (x y) z = ((xa y)a)z = za (xa y) x (y z) = xa (y z) = xa (ya z) = za (ya x) = za (xa y), whence (x y) z = x (y z). Consequently (S, ) is a commutative semigroup. Let S be the commutative inverse semigroup. We define a new operation on S as follows: a b = ba 1, a, b S. It has been shown in [3] that (S, ) is Abel-Grassmann s groupoid. Connections mentioned above makes AG-groupoid to be among the most interesting nonassociative structures. Same as in Semigroup Theory bands and band decompositions appears as the most fruitful methods for research on AG-groupoids. If in AG-groupoid S every element is an idempotent, then S is an AGband. An AG-groupoid S is an AG-band Y of AG-groupoids S α if S = S α, Y is an AG-band, S α S β = for α, β Y, α β and S α S β S αβ. A congruence ρ on S is called band congruence if S/ρ is a band. α Y 2. Some decompositions of AG-bands Let S be a semigroup and for each a S, a 2 = a. That is, let S be an associative band. If for all a, b S, ab = ba, then S is a semilattice. If for all a, b S, a = aba, then S is the rectangular band. It is a well known

Abel-Grassmann s bands 97 result in Semigroup Theory that the associative band S is a semilattice of rectangular bands. It is not hard to prove that a commutative AG-band is a semilattice. Let us now introduce the following notion. Definition 2.1. Let S be an AG-band, we say that S is an antirectangular AG-band if for every a, b S, a = ba b. Let us remark that in that case it holds a = ba b = ba bb = bb ab = b ab. (2) From above it follows that each antirectangular AG-band is a quasigroup. Example 2.1. Let a groupoid S be a given by the following table. 1 2 3 4 1 1 4 2 3 2 3 2 4 1 3 4 1 3 2 4 2 3 1 4 Then S is an antirectangular AG-band and a quasigroup. Let us remark that S is the unique AG-band of order 4 and we shall see below that it appears frequently in band decompositions both as an AG-band into which other bands can be decomposed and like a component. For this reasons from now on we shall call this band Traka 4 or simply T 4. We also remark that nonassociative AG-bands of order 3 do not exist. An AG-band is anticommutative if for all a, b S, ab = ba impies that a = b. Lemma 2.1. Every antirectangular AG-band is anticommutative. Proof. Let S be an antirectangular band, a, b S and ab = ba. Then a = ba b = ab b = bb a = ba = ab = aa b = ba a = ab a = b. Theorem 2.1. If S is an AG-band, then S is an AG-band Y of, in general case nontrivial, antirectangular AG-bands S α, α Y. Proof. Let S be an AG-band. Then we define the relation ρ on S as aρb a = ba b, b = ab a. (3)

98 P. V. Protić and N. Stevanović Clearly, the relation ρ is reflexive and symmetric. If aρb, bρc, then by (2) and (3) we have ac a = ac (ba b) = ((ba b)c)a = (cb ba)a = (a ba) cb = b cb = c. Similarly, a = ca c thus the relation ρ is transitive. Hence, ρ is an equivalence relation. Let aρb and c S. Then by (1) and the medial law we have ac = (ba b)c = cb ba = (cc b) ba = (bc c) ba = (ba c) bc = (ba cc) bc = (bc ac) bc. Dually, bc = (ac bc) ac and so acρbc. Also, ca = cc a = ac c = ((ba b)c)c = (cb ba)c = (c ba) cb = (cc ba) cb = (cb ca) cb. Dually, cb = (ca cb) ca and so caρcb. Hence, ρ is a congruence on S. Since S is a band we have that ρ is a band congruence on S. From aρb we have a = a 2 ρab, whence it follows that ρ-classes are closed under the operation. By the definition of ρ it follows that ρ-classes are antirectangular AG-bands. By Lemma 2.1, ρ classes are anticommutative AG-bands. In Example 2.1. we have ρ = S S. Example 2.2. Let AG-band S be given by the following table. 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 1 2 2 5 6 4 2 2 2 2 5 6 4 3 2 2 3 5 6 4 4 6 6 6 4 2 5 5 4 4 4 6 5 2 6 5 5 5 2 4 6 Now, S = S α S β S γ where S α = {1}, S β = {3}, S γ = {2, 4, 5, 6} are equivalence classes mod ρ and Y = {α, β, γ} is a semilattice. Obviously, S α, S β are trivial AG-bands and S γ is anti-isomorphic with AG-band T 4 (as is Example 2.1.). Lemma 2.2. Let S be an AG-band and e, a, b S. Then ea = eb implies that ae = be and conversely.

Abel-Grassmann s bands 99 Proof. Suppose that ea = eb, then ae = aa e = ea a = eb a = eb aa = ea ba = eb ba = (ee b) ba = (be e) ba = (ba e) be = (ea b) be = (eb b) be = (bb e) be = be be = be. Conversely, suppose that ae = be, then ea = ee a = ae e = be e = ee b = eb. Remark 2.1. As a consequence of Lemma 2.2, e = ef and so e = fe and conversely. Theorem 2.2. Let S be an AG-band. Then the relation ν defined on S by is a band congruence relation on S. aνb ( e S) ea = eb Proof. Reflexivity and symmetry is obvious. Suppose that aνb and bνc for some a, b, c S. Then there exist elements e, f S such that ea = eb and fb = fc. According to the Lemma 2.2 we also have ae = be, bf = cf. Now fe a = ae f = be f = be ff = bf ef = cf ef = ce ff = ce f = fe c, implies that ν is transitive. It remains to prove compatibility. Suppose aνb and let c S be an arbitrary element. Then there exists e S such that ea = eb. We have, now c ea = c eb = cc ea = cc eb = ce ca = ce cb, so aνcb. Similarly so acνbc. ea c = eb c = ea cc = eb cc = ec ac = ec bc, In Example 2.1 we have ν, since S is a quasigroup. In Example 2.2, S = S α S β S γ S δ, where S α = {1, 2, 3}, S β = {4}, S γ = {5}, S δ = {6} are the equivalence classes mod ν. Let us remark that AG-band Y = {α, β, γ, δ} is anti-isomorphic with T 4. Lemma 2.3. Let S be an AG-groupoid. Then the relation σ on S defined by the formula aσb ab = ba is reflexive, symmetric and compatible.

100 P. V. Protić and N. Stevanović Proof. Clearly σ is reflexive and symmetric. medial law we have ac bc = ab cc = ba cc = bc ac, ca cb = cc ab = cc ba = cb ca. If aσb and c S, then by Hence acσbc, caσcb, and so σ is left and right compatible. This means that σ is compatible. Definition 2.2. Let S be an AG-band. Then S is transitively commutative if for every a, b, c S from ab = ba and bc = cb it follows that ac = ca. It is easy to verify that AG-bands in examples 2.1 and 2.2 are transitively commutative. Theorem 2.3. Let S be a transitively commutative AG-band. Then S is an AG-band Y of, in general case nontrivial, semilattices S α, α Y. Proof. In this way the relation σ defined by (3) is transitive. Now, by Lemma 2.3 we have that relation σ is a band congruence on S. Clearly, σ-classes are commutative AG-bands, i.e., semilattices. In Example 2.2 we have that S = S α S β S γ S δ, AG-band Y = {α, β, γ, δ} is anti-isomorphic with AG-band T 4, S α = {1, 2, 3} is nontrivial semilattice and S β = {4}, S γ = {5}, S δ = {6} are trivial semilattices. Now, let S be a transitively commutative AG-band, and let aσb ab = ba. Then from ab a = ba a = aa b = aa bb = ab ab, ab b = bb a = bb aa = ba ba = ab ab it follows that ab a = ab b, and so aνb. Hence, if S is an transitively commutative AG-band, then σ ν. 3. The natural partial order of AG-band Theorem 3.1. If S is AG-band, then the relation defined on E(S) e f e = ef is a (natural ) partial order relation and is compatible with the right and with the left with multiplication.

Abel-Grassmann s bands 101 Proof. Clearly, e e and relation is reflexive. Let e f, f e, then e = ef, f = fe and by the Remark 2.1 we have e = f so relation is antisymmetric. If e f, f g then e = ef, f = fg also by the Remark 2.1 it holds that f = gf. Now by (1) it follows that eg = ef g = gf e = fe = e. Hence, e g and relation is transitive thus is a partial order relation. Now, e f e = ef and g S yields eg = ef g = ef gg = eg fg, ge = g ef = gg ef = ge gf so eg fg, ge gf. Hence, the relation is left and right compatible with multiplication. In Example 2.1,. In Example 2.2 we have 2 < 1, 2 < 3 while other elements are uncomparable. References [1] J. Dénes and A. D. Keedwell: Latin squares and their applications, Akadémia Kiadó, Budapest (1974). [2] P. Holgate: Groupoids satisfying simple invertive law, Math. Student 61 (1992), 101 106. [3] Q. Mushtaq and S. M. Yusuf: On LA-semigroup defined by a commutative inverse semigroup, Matematički vesnik 40 (1988), 59 62. [4] Q. Mushtaq and M. S. Kamran: On LA-semigroups with weak associative law, Scientific Khyber 1 (1989), 69 71. [5] P. V. Protić and N. Stevanović: On Abel-Grassmann s groupoids (review), Proc. math. conf. in Pristina (1994), 31 38. [6] P. V. Protić and N. Stevanović: AG-test and some general properties of Abel-Grasmann s groupoids, PU.M.A. 6 (1995), 371 383. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Received August 28, 2002 Beogradska 14 Revised February 26, 2003 18000 Niš Serbia and Montenegro e-mail: pvprotic@mail.gaf.ni.ac.yu spreca@yahoo.com