MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY IN TOPSOILS AND BULK CORES OF CULTIVATED CALCISOLS Laura Quijano 1, Leticia Gaspar 1, Marcos A.E. Chaparro 2, Ana Navas 1*

Similar documents
Geophysical Journal International

Comparative study of top soil magnetic susceptibility variation based on some human activities

Magnetic properties of soils from landslide potential area (Case study: Pasir Ipis-Lembang, West Bandung)

Measurement of Magnetic Susceptibility of Soils in Jalingo, N-E Nigeria: A Case Study of the Jalingo Mechanic Village

KAI . "# $ % #&!'()! !"#$$% :. $ "# :.!&! & :. #%"&!)*+ &'&$() )$% : *!+(,&"% -. % #)% :

A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF MAGNETIC PROPERTIES IN SEDIMENTS FROM THE ANLLÓNS RIVERBED, AND THEIR POSSIBLE ASSOCIATION TO ANTHROPOGENIC POLLUTION

CORE CORRELATION AND PRELIMINARY PALEOSECULAR VARIATION RESULTS FROM LACUSTRINE SEDIMENTS OF LAGUNA POTROK AIKE (PATAGONIA, ARGENTINA)

Magnetic property of loess strata recorded by Kansu profile in Tianshan Mountains

MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY OF DRILL CUTTINGS IN A NORTH SEA OIL WELL: A RAPID, NON- DESTRUCTIVE MEANS OF CHARACTERIZING LITHOLOGY

Review of magnetism and heavy metal pollution studies of various environments in Argentina

Magnetic properties of surface soils across the southern Tarim Basin and their relationship with climate and source materials

Magnetic Properties as Indicator of Heavy Metal Contaminations in Roadside Soil and Dust Along G312 Highways

Operating Manual for. BSS-02B Borehole Magnetic Susceptibility Sonde. OM1741

3-Dimensional Surface Magnetic Susceptibility Distributions with Depth to Investigate Anthropogenic Pollutants Boundary in Abuja Metropolis

One or two magnets falling in a conductive pipe: On-axis and off-axis fall and the role of the pipe wall thickness

QUANTIFYING SHALE MINERALOGY AND ANISOTROPY FROM LOW TEMPERATURE MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY MEASUREMENTS

Latinmag Letters, Volume 3, Special Issue (2013), OB13, 1-5. Proceedings Montevideo, Uruguay

Time variation of total electron content over Tucumán, Argentina

Assistance with magnetic susceptibility measurements Soil samples from the archive of the Agropedology Institute, Sarajevo.

The precipitation series in La Plata, Argentina and its possible relationship with geomagnetic activity

45º CONGRESO ESPAÑOL DE ACÚSTICA 8º CONGRESO IBÉRICO DE ACÚSTICA EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON SMART CITIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACOUSTICS

VIRGILIO RUBIO-NIEBLAS MSc., Universidad Autónoma de Baja California.Mexicali, México,

Environmental Magnetic Susceptibility. Using the Bartington MS2 System - John Dearing

MS2. Magnetic Susceptibility System. For innovation in magnetic measuring instruments

DISCRIMINATION OF HYDROCARBON-RELATED CONDITIONS BASED ON A STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MAGNETIC PARAMETERS

Magnetic studies of natural goethite samples from Tharsis, Huelva, Spain

ROCK MAGNETIC STUDIES FROM THE RIO VALDEZ PALEOLAKE OUTCROUP (TIERRA DEL FUEGO, ARGENTINA): PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Variable shape of magnetic hysteresis loops in the Chinese loess-paleosol sequence

a) Prepare a normal probability plot of the effects. Which effects seem active?

REVISTA INVESTIGACION OPERACIONAL VOL. 38, NO. 3, , 2017

k + ln x 2, para x 0, k, en el punto en que x = 2, tiene la 1. La normal a la curva y = x

Fallout radiocaesium in Mackellar Inlet during the austral summer 2013

RAPID ESTIMATION OF HYDRAULIC FLOW UNIT PARAMETERS RQI AND FZI FROM MAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS IN SOME SHOREFACE RESERVOIRS

SEDIMENT DESCRIPTION

Analysis of Shear Strength Non-linear Envelopes of Soil-Geomembrane Interface and its Influence in the Heap Leach Pad Stability

ANEXO AL TEMA 4 FÍSICA DEL ESTADO SÓLIDO II

RESEARCH PAPER. A Preliminary Study of the Magnetic Propiertes of Laterite Soils as Indicators of Pedogenic Processes

Natural and man-made radionuclides in the soil of a nuclear facility site located in a coniferous forest in central Mexico

EPOS- a multiparameter measuring system to earthquake research

Published online August 9, 2007 Magnetic Enhancement and Iron Oxides in the Upper Luochuan Loess Paleosol Sequence, Chinese Loess Plateau

PHY331 Magnetism. Lecture 1

Environmental magnetism: measuring, monitoring and modelling urban street dust pollution

Huma Akram, Mitsuo Yoshida, and Mirza Naseer Ahmad

Radiological impact of rutile covered welding electrodes

Subatomic particle location charge mass

Performing sequential WMs to reconstruct the density matrix of a twolevel. Seminario de Óptica Cuántica Mar

Atmospheric pressure variations and water mass exchange between the continental shelf and the Bay of Cadiz*

A note on inertial motion

AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF

SPATIOTEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION OF SEISMIC EVENTS IN THE PACIFIC REGION AND SOUTH AMERICA Elena Sasorova 1, Boris Levin 2

The lumped heat capacity method applied to target heating

Certificate of analysis Certified reference material code: CRM-00-NEO

Improved Exponential Type Ratio Estimator of Population Variance

arxiv: v6 [cs.na] 12 Nov 2015

Rainfall dependent transformations of iron oxides in a tropical saprolite transect of Hainan Island, South China: Spectral and magnetic measurements

Certificate of analysis Certified reference material code: CRM-00-GTX1&4

Relationships between magnetic parameters, chemical composition and clay minerals of topsoils near Coimbra, central Portugal

MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY AS A RAPID, NON- DESTRUCTIVE TECHNIQUE FOR IMPROVED RCAL AND SCAL PARAMETER PREDICTION

An alternative method for determination of cations in solution of small soil samples 1

A note on concavity, homogeneity and non-increasing returns to scale

Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology

Determination of electromagnetic cavity modes using the Finite Difference Frequency-Domain Method

MAGNETIC PROPERTIES OF MAGHEMITE: A HEISENBERG-MONTE CARLO APPROACH. Colombia

La aplicación de la clasificación de áreas urbanas funcionales de la OCDE para el análisis de patrones de empleo local en España

Clase: Regresión Parte I

Solar activity and climate in Central America

TESTING of AGGREGATES for CONCRETE

Simultaneous description of elastic, fusion and total reaction cross sections

EFFECT OF THE DESIGN OF THE MECHANICAL AMPLIFIER IN THE BEHAVIOUR OF A HIGH POWER ULTRASONIC TRANSDUCER

Reanalysis of ten years mb time series on tropical La Conejeras

Prehistoric Clay Sources: A Forensic Exercise in Geoarchaeology

Atlas de anatomía palpatoria. Tomo 2. Miembro inferior (Spanish Edition)

EFFECT OF SCINTILLATION ON ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEMS

Series 5.0 Serie 5.0 CLUTCH-BRAKES SERIES 5.0 FRENO-EMBRAGUES SERIE 5.0

The magnetic properties of Serbian loess and its environmental significance

ADRIAN VAZQUEZ V. Dr(Est.)Inst Politécnico Nacional, México, Centro de Investigación Cienc.

DATA ANALYSIS OF MOA FOR GRAVITATIONAL MICROLENSING EVENTS WITH DURATIONS LESS THAN 2 DAYS BY USING BROWN DWARF POPULATION

Algebra I Aim: How do we determine the equation of a function from its graph? HW: "Vacations" Worksheet

Mathematical formulation of restrictions for the design of low voltage bandgap references

Rock-magnetic investigation of Siberia loess and its implication

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.class-ph] 26 Oct 2006

Selective dissolution of magnetic iron oxides with the acid-ammonium-oxalate/ferrous-iron extraction technique II. Natural loess and palaeosol samples

Elimination of variability sources in NIR spectra for the determination of fat content in olive fruits

Using environmental metrics to describe the spatial and temporal evolution of landscape structure and soil hydrology and fertility

Conceptual model for prediction of magnetic properties in tropical soils

Z Transformation by Pascal Matrix and its Applications in the Design of IIR Filters

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY REPORT. Timolin, County Kildare. Date: 18/01/2016. Licence: 15R0133

Dissolution behaviour of fine-grained magnetite and maghemite in the citrate bicarbonate dithionite extraction method

EVALUATION OF MIGRATION OF HEAVY METAL CONTAINING SEDIMENT RESULTING FROM WATER EROSION USING A GEO- INFORMATION MODEL

como trabajan las calculadoras?

Model Calculation of backscatter and extinction coefficients for urban aerosols in Cali, Colombia

A proof of Holsztyński theorem

Aerosol optical properties by means of a sunphotometer and LIDAR system in Buenos Aires Argentina.

Journal of the Mexican Chemical Society ISSN: X Sociedad Química de México México

Reciprocity relations for Bollmann s o-lattice

Blast densification: A proposed methodology to quantify the amount of densification required to prevent liquefaction and flow in sandy soils

On Almost Continuity and Expansion of Open Sets

TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE SIMULATION OF THE EMISSION COEFFICIENT VIA EMITTER CAPACITANCE

, Horton , km Tsinghua Tongfang Optical Disc Co., Ltd. All rights reserved. Vol. 21, No. 2 GEO GRAPHICAL RESEARCH

PLEIOTROPIC GENE AND ITS INFLUENCE ON STEM, PETIOLE AND BRACT TIP PIGMENTATION IN SUNFLOWER (Helianthus annuus L.)

Transcription:

MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY IN TOPSOILS AND BULK CORES OF CULTIVATED CALCISOLS Laura Quijano 1, Leticia Gaspar 1, Marcos A.E. Chaparro 2, Ana Navas 1* 1 Department of Soil and Water, Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, CSIC, Zaragoza, Spain 2 Instituto de Física Arroyo Seco (UNCPBA)-CONICET, Pinto 399, B7000GHG Tandil, Argentina. Abstract The magnetic susceptibility (MS) in soils is a fast and non-destructive technique that can be used to infer the concentration of magnetic minerals. The objective of this study was to analyze MS on topsoil and bulk core samples of cultivated Calcisols. Magnetic susceptibility was measured at two different frequencies to assess the variation of magnetic susceptibility when the frequency of the applied magnetic field changed. The low frequency values of mass-specific MS ranged between 16.0 and 57.6 10-8 m 3 kg -1. High correlation coefficients were found between the MS in topsoil and bulk core samples (r = 0.94). In addition, magnetic susceptibility was measured in situ in the field to compare with the results obtained in the laboratory. The measurements of MS in the field varied from 10.0 to 48.0 10-5 SI. High correlation coefficients were found between MS in laboratory and field measurements (r = 0.88). The methodology applied in this study using a susceptibility meter and a dual frequency sensor for the laboratory measurements and a probe handle for the field measurements has proved to be useful for fast and reliable measurements of MS in the field. Resumen La medida de la susceptibilidad magnética (SM) en suelos es una técnica rápida y no destructiva que puede ser empleada para inferir la concentración de los minerales magnéticos. El objetivo de este estudio es medir la SM en muestras superficiales y en muestras de perfil completo en suelos Calcisoles cultivados. La susceptibilidad magnética se midió en dos frecuencias diferentes para analizar su variación cuando la frecuencia del campo magnético aplicado cambia. Los valores de susceptibilidad magnética medida a baja frecuencia varían entre 16.0 y 57.6 10-8 m 3 kg -1. Los coeficientes de correlación entre las medidas de SM de las muestras superficiales y las de perfil completo son altos (r = 0.94). Además, la susceptibilidad magnética se midió en campo para compararla con las medidas de laboratorio. Las medidas en campo varían entre 10.0 y 48.0 10-5 SI. Los coeficientes de correlación entre las medidas de SM en el laboratorio y las de campo son altos (r = 0.88). La metodología aplicada en este estudio que utiliza un susceptibilímetro y un sensor dual para las medidas de laboratorio y un sensor portátil para las medidas de campo ha sido de utilidad para realizar medidas rápidas y fiables de SM en el campo. Introduction Soil magnetic susceptibility is used in a variety of environmental research such as anthropogenic pollution monitoring (Schibler et al, 2002, Chaparro et al., 2007), pedogenic processes related with magnetic minerals forming (Torrent et al., 2010) and soil degradation (Sadiki, et al., 2009). Volumetric MS (κ) is the ratio of the magnetization to the applied magnetic field (Mullins, 1977). The κ is a dimensionless parameter (10-5 SI). The mass-specific susceptibility is χ = κ/ρ, where ρ is the density and the unit is 10-8 m 3 kg -1. D09-1/6

Mass-specific susceptibility is a magnetic concentration-dependent parameter, and their values vary according to the nature of materials, i.e. diamagnetic (~ -6 10-9 m 3 kg -1 ), paramagnetic (~ 10-6 m 3 kg -1 ), antiferromagnetic (~ 6-7 10-7 m 3 kg -1 ), and ferrimagnetic materials (~ 0.5-5.6 10-3 m 3 kg -1 ). Matherials and Methods The soils, topsoil and bulk cores, were sampled in a cultivated area in northeast Spain (42º25 38.52 N; 1º13 14.04 W). The topsoil samples were collected with a 4 cm diameter manual core driller at 5 cm depth. The bulk core profile samples were collected using a 7 cm diameter automatic core driller at 30 50 cm depth. A total of 290 samples were sampled, air dried and stored at 4º C prior to the analyses. Magnetic susceptibility was measured in the laboratory with a Bartington MS2 meter linked to a MS2B dual frequency sensor (Bartington Instruments Ltd.). The sensor operates with an alternating current producing an alternating magnetic field (80 A/m, Bartington Instruments Ltd., 2000). The MS2B dual frequency sensor is used with 10 ml sample containers. The sensor can be operated at two different frequencies, at low frequency 0.465 khz (LF) and at high frequency 4.65 khz (HF). Samples were measured at each frequency for studying the frequency dependence of susceptibility. The low frequency is usually selected when single frequency measurements are needed. In this study three measures of MS were taken from each sample and the average was done. The frequency dependence of magnetic susceptibility is expressed as percentage (χ FD %): χ FD % = [(χ LF χ HF )/ χ LF ] 100 Magnetic susceptibility was measured in situ in the field (κis) using the MS2D probe handle. This probe handle has a mean diameter of 185 mm and operates on the same principle of the MS2B dual frequency sensor. In the field, the sensor is placed on the soil surface. Before taking a reading it is necessary to remove any vegetation to avoid rough surfaces. The depth of response is 50% at 15 mm and 10% at 60 mm. Magnetic susceptibility was measured on the 145 sites corresponding to the samples for the laboratory measurements. Three measurements were taken at each site and the average of these measurements was done. Results The results of χ measured on topsoil samples in the laboratory are presented in Table 1. The MS values at low frequency (χ LF ) varied from 13.9 to 46.0 10-8 m 3 kg -1 and the values of MS at high frequency (χ HF ) ranged between 12.7 and 41.0 10-8 m 3 kg -1. Table 1. Descriptive statistics of the magnetic susceptibility in the topsoil samples. Magnetic susceptibility n mean st.dev median variance [10-8 m 3 kg -1 ] χ LF 145 29.2 7.7 28.8 59.1 χ HF 145 26.1 6.7 25.7 45.2 In the bulk core samples χ LF values varied from 16.0 to 57.6 10-8 m 3 kg -1 and χ HF values ranged between 14.7 and 53.3 10-8 m 3 kg -1 (Table 2). As expected, the values of MS at low frequency are always higher than at high frequency (Dearing, 1994). Table 2. Descriptive statistics of the magnetic susceptibility in the bulk core samples. Magnetic susceptibility n mean st.dev median variance [10-8 m 3 kg -1 ] χ LF 145 33.9 9.1 34.6 83.1 χ HF 145 30.5 8.1 30.8 66.1 D09-2/6

The values of low frequency MS in the bulk core samples are significantly different (p > 99 %) and slightly higher than in the topsoil samples. Values of MS in topsoil and bulk core samples are highly correlated (Figure 1). Similarly, the values of high frequency MS in the bulk core samples are significantly different (p > 99 %) and slightly higher than in the topsoil samples and also high correlation coefficients were found between these two groups of samples (Figure 1). Figure 1. Linear regressions between low frequency and high frequency in bulk core and topsoil samples. The MS measurements at two different frequencies are used to detect the presence of ultrafine <0.03μm superparamagnetic minerals (SP). When SP minerals are present in a soil sample the values of MS at high frequency are slightly lower than values of MS measured at low frequency. If there are not SP minerals the two measurements are identical (Dearing, 1994). There is a slight difference between χ LF and χ HF values measured in the laboratory (Δχ = χ LF - χ HF ) which indicates the presence of SP minerals in the Calcisols (Table 3). The values of Δχ in the topsoil samples ranged between 0.9 and 5.0 10-8 m 3 kg -1 and the values of Δχ for the bulk core samples varied from 1.1 to 6.1 10-8 m 3 kg -1. Table 3. Descriptive statistics of Δχ values in topsoil and bulk core samples. Magnetic susceptibility n sample mean st.dev median variance [10-8 m 3 kg -1 ] Δχ 145 topsoils 3.2 1.0 3.2 1.0 Δχ 145 bulk cores 3.4 1.1 3.5 1.1 Figure 2 relates the χ LF and χ HF values in the topsoil and bulk core samples. In both cases the correlation coefficients are highly significant. Similarly to what Δχ values suggest the slope different from 1 and the small and positive intercept in the regression reflects the presence of SP minerals. Figure 2. Linear regressions between low frequency and high frequency magnetic susceptibility in topsoil and bulk core samples. D09-3/6

Figure 3 compares the Δχ and χ LF values in the topsoil and bulk core samples. An increase in magnetic susceptibility at low frequency appears to be related with the increase in the difference between the measures of MS at low and high frequency. According to Foster et al. (1994) such linear correlation indicates that with increasing magnitude the susceptibility is more controlled by the contribution from the fine pedogenic magnetic fraction. Figure 3. Linear regressions between Δχ values and low frequency magnetic susceptibility in topsoil and bulk core samples. The variations in the frequency dependence (χ FD %) are commonly due to the variable content of superparamagnetic grains (Forster et al., 1994). The χ FD % values in the topsoil samples varied from 6.1 to 13.1 % and in the bulk core samples ranged between 5.0 and 13.3 % (Table 4). Table 4. Descriptive statistics of the frequency dependence of magnetic susceptibility values. Frequency dependence % n sample mean st.dev median variance χ FD % 145 topsoils 10.6 1.1 10.8 1.3 χ FD % 145 bulk cores 9.9 1.3 10.0 1.6 According to Dearing (1994) it is possible to obtain semi-quantitative estimates by relating the percentage of the frequency dependence MS and the concentration of SP grains. Dearing establishes that the values of χ FD ranging between 2.0 and 10.0% are considered as medium values. This range is interpreted as an admixture of SP and coarser non-sp grains, or < 0.005 μm SP grains. The values of χ FD ranging between 10 and 14% are considered high values. Samples within this range can be interpreted as soils where virtually all iron components are SP grains (>75%). In the topsoils the percentage of soil samples with high values of χ FD (73 %) was significantly higher than that of medium χ FD values (27 %) (Table 5). The Anova test indicates that means of high and medium values were significantly different. Table 5. Descriptive statistics of the ranges of frequency dependence in topsoils according to Dearing (1994). χ FD n mean st.dev median variance min max Medium values (2-10 %) 39 9.2 0.9 9.4 0.8 6.1 10.0 High values (10-14 %) 106 11.2 0.7 11.1 0.4 10.0 13.1 In the bulk cores around 51 % of the samples are within the range of 2 to 10 % whereas the remaining 49 % are included in the range of 10 to 14 % (Table 6). The Anova test indicates that means of high and medium values are also significantly different. D09-4/6

Table 6. Descriptive statistics of the ranges of frequency dependence in bulk cores according to Dearing (1994). χ FD n mean st.dev median variance min max Medium values (2-10 %) 74 8.9 1.0 9.3 1.0 5.0 10.0 High values (10-14 %) 71 10.8 0.7 10.6 0.5 10.0 13.3 The means of the medium values of χ FD are not significantly different in the topsoils and the bulk cores but means of high values of χ FD are higher and significantly different in the topsoils than in bulk core samples (Figure 4) suggesting that topsoils have higher concentrations of SP minerals than bulk core samples. Figure 4. Box-plots of χ FD % in topsoil and bulk core samples (Medium values: 2-10%, high values: 10.0-14.0% ). Results of magnetic susceptibility in the field were corrected for smooth surfaces (Bartington Instruments Ltd., 2000). In addition, the values of low frequency susceptibility measured in the laboratory for topsoil samples were also expressed as volumetric values (κ) (Lecoanet et al. 1999) (Table 7). The linear regression between κ and κis showed high and significant correlation (Figure 5). Table 7. Descriptive statistics of magnetic susceptibility in topsoils and in the field. Magnetic susceptibility n sample mea st.dev media variance min max [10-5 SI] n n κ 145 topsoils 40.4 11.8 38.9 139.6 18.7 65.9 κis 145 field 32.5 10.7 32.7 113.7 13.3 64.0 Figure 5. Linear regression between κ measured in the field and in the laboratory. D09-5/6

Conclusions The measures of magnetic susceptibility are slightly and significantly higher in the bulk cores than in the topsoil samples and their values are highly correlated. Iron components in topsoil layers contribute relatively more to bulk MS than the bulk profile. The difference between the values of high and low frequency MS indicates the presence of SP minerals in the cultivated Calcisols. The values of frequency dependence susceptibility range between 6.12 and 13.09% in the topsoil and 5-13.30% in the bulk core samples which are medium to high values of frequency dependence. The percentage of topsoil samples included within the range of frequency dependence is higher (74%) than in the bulk core samples (51%) suggesting a relatively high content of superparamagnetic minerals in topsoils. The field measurements of κis correlated well with the measurements in the laboratory (κ), therefore it is possible to use the MS2D probe for a fast screening on the contents of magnetic minerals in cultivated soils. References Bartington Instruments Ltd., 2000, Operation manual for MS2 Magnetic Susceptibility System, Bartington Instruments Ltd, Oxford, 1-72. Chaparro M.A.E., Nuñez H., Lirio J.M., Gogorza C.S.G. and Sinito A.M., 2007. Magnetic screening and heavy metal pollution studies in soils from Marambio station, Antarctica. Antarct. Sci., 19, 379 393. Dearing J.A., 1994, Booklet - Environmental Magnetic Susceptibility - Using The Bartington MS2 System -. Foster, Th., Evans, M.E., Heller, F., 1994, The frequency dependence of low field susceptibility in loess sediments, Geophys. J. Int., Vol. 118, 63-642. Lecoanet, H., Lévêque, F., Segura, S., 1999, Magnetic susceptibility in environmental applications: comparison of field probes, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 115, 191-204. Mullins, C.E., 1977, Magnetic susceptibility of the soil and its significance in soil science-a review, J. Soil. Sci., Vol. 28, 223-246 Sadiki, A., Faleh, A., Navas, A., y Bouhlassa, S., 2009, Using magnetic susceptibility to asses soil degradation in the eastern Rif, Morocco, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Vol. 34 (15), 2057-2069 Schibler, L., Boyko, T., Ferdyn, M., Gajda, B., Höll, S., Jordanova, N., Rösler, W., y Magprox 5 Team., 2002, Topsoil magnetic susceptibility mapping: Data reproducibility and compatibility, meaurement strategy, Stud. Geophys. Geod, 46, 43-57. Torrent, J., Liu, Q.S., y Barrón, V., 2010, Magnetic susceptibility changes in relation to pedogenesis in a Xeralf chronosequence in northwestern Spain, European Journal of soil Science, 61, 161-173. D09-6/6