WM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona USA. Reportable Nuclide Criteria for ORNL Radioactive Waste Management Activities 13005

Similar documents
Radiometric Dating (tap anywhere)

Element Cube Project (x2)

The Periodic Table. Periodic Properties. Can you explain this graph? Valence Electrons. Valence Electrons. Paramagnetism

Categorization of nuclear materials, radioactive sources and radioactive wastes

7) Applications of Nuclear Radiation in Science and Technique (1) Analytical applications (Radiometric titration)

Atoms and the Periodic Table

CLASS TEST GRADE 11. PHYSICAL SCIENCES: CHEMISTRY Test 4: Matter and materials 1

Nucleus. Electron Cloud

Last 4 Digits of USC ID:

Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start.

The European Activation File: EAF-2005 decay data library

Spin Cut-off Parameter of Nuclear Level Density and Effective Moment of Inertia

Guide to the Extended Step-Pyramid Periodic Table

Multi Analyte Custom Grade Solution. Aluminum, Potassium, Magnesium, ANALYTE CERTIFIED VALUE ANALYTE CERTIFIED VALUE

02/05/09 Last 4 Digits of USC ID: Dr. Jessica Parr

CHEM 130 Exp. 8: Molecular Models

INSTRUCTIONS: CHEM Exam I. September 13, 1994 Lab Section

The Periodic Table of the Elements

Ch. 9 NOTES ~ Chemical Bonding NOTE: Vocabulary terms are in boldface and underlined. Supporting details are in italics.

Computational Physics and Engineering Division ORIGEN-S DECAY DATA LIBRARY AND HALF-LIFE UNCERTAINTIES. O. W. Hermann, P. R. Daniel,* and J. C.

The Periodic Table of Elements

Grade 11 Science Practice Test

Made the FIRST periodic table

Metallurgical Chemistry. An Audio Course for Students

(C) Pavel Sedach and Prep101 1

8. Relax and do well.

1 of 5 14/10/ :21

8. Relax and do well.

Chemistry 1 First Lecture Exam Fall Abbasi Khajo Levine Mathias Mathias/Ortiz Metlitsky Rahi Sanchez-Delgado Vasserman

CHEM 10113, Quiz 5 October 26, 2011

Lab Day and Time: Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start.

Chapter 12 The Atom & Periodic Table- part 2

Solutions and Ions. Pure Substances

610B Final Exam Cover Page

Application of prompt gamma activation analysis with neutron beams for the detection and analysis of nuclear materials in containers

HANDOUT SET GENERAL CHEMISTRY II

Upper Limit in Mendeleev s Periodic Table

PERIODIC TABLE OF THE ELEMENTS

CHEM 171 EXAMINATION 1. October 9, Dr. Kimberly M. Broekemeier. NAME: Key

PHYSICAL SCIENCES MARCH CONTROLLED TEST GRADE

DO NOW: Retrieve your projects. We will be reviewing them again today. Textbook pg 23, answer questions 1-3. Use the section 1.2 to help you.

Lab Day and Time: Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start.

5 questions, 3 points each, 15 points total possible. 26 Fe Cu Ni Co Pd Ag Ru 101.

CHM 101 PRACTICE TEST 1 Page 1 of 4

(please print) (1) (18) H IIA IIIA IVA VA VIA VIIA He (2) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17)

PHYSICAL SCIENCES GRADE : 10

8. Relax and do well.

Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences Chemistry Department. Semester Test 1. Analytical Chemistry CMY 283. Time: 120 min Marks: 100 Pages: 6

Circle the letters only. NO ANSWERS in the Columns!

8. Relax and do well.

Chapter 3: Stoichiometry

1.0 ACCREDITATION / REGISTRATION 2.0 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 3.0 CERTIFIED VALUES AND UNCERTAINTIES. Assay Information:

1 Genesis 1:1. Chapter 10 Matter. Lesson. Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. (NKJV)

Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start.

MANY ELECTRON ATOMS Chapter 15

Single Analyte Mass Spec Solution ± µg/ml g/ml (measured at 20 ± 1 ºC) METHOD NIST SRM# SRM LOT#

1 of 16 1/28/2014 2:35 PM. Search

Using the Periodic Table

7. Relax and do well.

Single Analyte Custom Grade Solution ± 4 µg/ml g/ml (measured at 20 ± 1 ºC) Acidimetric NIST SRM 84L Lot Number: 84L

CHEM 172 EXAMINATION 1. January 15, 2009

What monitoring techniques are appropriate and effective for detecting CO2 migration in groundwater: isotope-based monitoring Philippe Négrel

8. Relax and do well.

Chem Exam 1. September 26, Dr. Susan E. Bates. Name 9:00 OR 10:00

Application of Spectral Summing to Suspect Low Level Debris Drums at Los Alamos National Laboratory

PART 1 Introduction to Theory of Solids

Essential Chemistry for Biology

Chemistry 431 Practice Final Exam Fall Hours

Application of Spectral Summing to Indeterminate Suspect Low-Level Drums at Los Alamos National Laboratory

CMSC 313 Lecture 17 Postulates & Theorems of Boolean Algebra Semiconductors CMOS Logic Gates

8. Relax and do well.

The exam must be written in ink. No calculators of any sort allowed. You have 2 hours to complete the exam. Periodic table 7 0

Single Analyte Custom Grade Solution g/ml (measured at 20 ± 1 ºC) ICP Assay NIST SRM 3163 Lot Number:

INSTRUCTIONS: Exam III. November 10, 1999 Lab Section

Chem GENERAL CHEMISTRY I MIDTERM EXAMINATION

Laser Spectroscopy on Bunched Radioactive Ion Beams

NAME: FIRST EXAMINATION

1.0 ACCREDITATION / REGISTRATION 2.0 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 3.0 CERTIFIED VALUES AND UNCERTAINTIES. Assay Information:

PRODUCTION OF RADIOISOTOPES FOR IMAGING AND THERAPY AT LOW ENERGY

PROOF/ÉPREUVE ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Space environment (natural and artificial) Galactic cosmic ray model

BROOKLYN COLLEGE Department of Chemistry. Chemistry 1 Second Lecture Exam Nov. 27, Name Page 1 of 5

8. Relax and do well.

Earth Materials I Crystal Structures

Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences Chemistry Department. Semester Test 1 MEMO. Analytical Chemistry CMY 283

If anything confuses you or is not clear, raise your hand and ask!

Lab Day and Time: Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start.

O R D E R OF THE HEAD OF THE STATE NUCLEAR POWER SAFETY INSPECTORATE

Lab Day and Time: Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start.

7. Relax and do well.

Part 2. Multiple choice (use answer card). 90 pts. total. 3 pts. each.

Body-centred-cubic (BCC) lattice model of nuclear structure

CHEM 107 (Spring-2005) Exam 3 (100 pts)

Chemistry Standard level Paper 1

Unit 1 Part 2 Atomic Structure and The Periodic Table Introduction to the Periodic Table UNIT 1 ATOMIC STRUCTURE AND THE PERIODIC TABLE

2 PART EXAM DO NOT WRITE ON THIS EXAM. List of Elements. Physics 123 section 1 Fall 2013 Instructor: Dallin S. Durfee Exam #4, Dec 6 - Dec 10

SOUTHERN NUCLEAR COMPANY VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 NRC DOCKET NOS AND

[ ]:543.4(075.8) 35.20: ,..,..,.., : /... ;. 2-. ISBN , - [ ]:543.4(075.8) 35.20:34.

Advanced Chemistry. Mrs. Klingaman. Chapter 5: Name:

Lab Day and Time: Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start. Page # Points possible Points awarded

Science 10. Unit 4:Physics. Block: Name: Book 3: radioactivty

Transcription:

Reportable Nuclide Criteria for ORNL Radioactive Waste Management Activities 13005 Kip McDowell*, Tim Forrester* and Mark Saunders** Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008 MS-6322, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 www.ornl.gov Fairfield Services Group, PO Box 31468, Knoxville, TN 37930 http://fairfieldsg.com/blog/ ABSTRACT The U.S. Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee generates numerous radioactive waste streams. Many of those streams contain a large number of radionuclides with an extremely broad range of concentrations. To feasibly manage the radionuclide information, ORNL developed reportable nuclide criteria to distinguish between those nuclides in a waste stream that require waste tracking versus those nuclides of such minimal activity that do not require tracking. The criteria include tracking thresholds drawn from ORNL onsite management requirements, transportation requirements, and relevant treatment and disposal facility acceptance criteria. As a management practice, ORNL maintains waste tracking on a nuclide in a specific waste stream if it exceeds any of the reportable nuclide criteria. Nuclides in a specific waste stream that screen out as non-reportable under all these criteria may be dropped from ORNL waste tracking. The benefit of these criteria is to ensure that nuclides in a waste stream with activities which meaningfully affect safety and compliance are tracked, while documenting the basis for removing certain isotopes from further consideration. INTRODUCTION The ORNL mission to advance the scientific basis for breakthrough nuclear technologies and systems involves work with varying quantities of a very large and diverse set of radionuclides. In some cases, radiological waste characterization methods result in the identification of nuclides present at minimal levels with regard to waste tracking and reporting requirements for onsite management, through transportation, and to offsite treatment/disposal. Waste characterization modeling of accelerator produced waste at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS), for instance, may include literally hundreds of nuclides. The minimal activity levels of some nuclides can only be calculated theoretically using computer models and cannot be detected through other characterization methods such as non-destructive assay or radiochemical analysis. Many of these nuclides are calculated at activity quantities orders of magnitude lower than one percent of the total activity. It is not practical or prudent to track in waste databases, list on shipping papers, and report to treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDF) minimal quantities of nuclides that have no regulatory or programmatic requirement for reporting. 1

While acknowledging that there is no universally recognized criteria below which minimal activity nuclides can be excluded from waste tracking, a reasonable framework for nuclide tracking balances the need for capturing essential nuclide information with the need for being pragmatic. This framework ensures that nuclides with activities that meaningfully affect waste calculations get reported, while allowing for the elimination of tracking on those minimal activity nuclides that do not. This paper documents reportable nuclide criteria for ORNL radioactive waste management activities in order to provide a technical basis for determining when it may be appropriate to drop certain nuclides from waste tracking. Any additional criteria used to drop waste tracking on nuclides will be documented in a Laboratory Waste Services approved radiological characterization calculation. The approved radiological calculation could, for example, document that the criteria related to Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) (Reference 1) Table E-1 action levels does not apply for a waste stream not destined for NNSS. It is important to note that this reportable nuclide criteria is specifically intended to apply only to those waste that will be managed as radioactive waste. The process for evaluating materials for release from radiological control is outside the scope of this document and must be performed under applicable procedures and DOE Orders. METHODOLOGY Review of ORNL Onsite Nuclide Tracking Requirements Facility Hazard Categorization Requirements for ORNL onsite tracking of nuclide activity are found in Standards Based Management System (SBMS) Subject Area Facility Hazard Categorization (Reference 2). The procedure, Establishing and Maintaining Facility Hazard Categorization Documents of Reference 2, requires that facility managers collect isotope and activity information for radiological material, including waste. A conservative factor of one order of magnitude below the referenced SBMS requirements is used for the Reportable Nuclide Criteria for ORNL Radioactive Waste Management Activities. Waste with nuclides exceeding any of the following criteria will be considered ORNL reportable nuclides: Equal to or Exceeds.0005% Hazard Category 3 Sum of Fractions (SOF) Equal to or Exceeds 0.0035 g U-235 Fissionable Equivalent Mass (FEM) Exceeds 1.5e-1 microcuries 2

Nuclear Criticality Safety Requirements for onsite tracking of fissionable material are found in SBMS Subject Area Nuclear Criticality Safety (Reference 3). This SBMS subject area refers to the SBMS Facility Hazard Categorization subject area for requirements for the safety evaluation and control of the fissionable material inventory of less-than-doe Hazard Category 3 facilities and activities. No unique reportable nuclide criteria were identified. Nuclear Material Control & Accountability Requirements for onsite tracking of accountable nuclear material are found in SBMS Subject Area Nuclear Materials Control and Accountability (Reference 4). The subject area points to the ORNL Nuclear Material Control and Accountability (NMC&A) Plan for the definition of reportable quantities of accountable material. The accountable quantity definition found in Appendix I of the NMC&A plan includes what is termed at ORNL as asterisk quantities. A conservative factor of one order of magnitude below the referenced SBMS requirements is used for the Reportable Nuclide Criteria for ORNL Radioactive Waste Management Activities. The reporting of uranium nuclides merits additional consideration due to the importance of uranium enrichment information. Since the ORNL NMC&A Plan has different tracking requirements for enriched versus natural or depleted uranium, and since most offsite TSDF s desire enrichment information on any uranium bearing waste they receive, then all uranium nuclides present in a waste will be reported if any uranium nuclide is present that requires reporting under any other ORNL reportable nuclide criteria. These criteria will ensure that uranium enrichment percentage integrity is maintained through the waste management lifecycle. Waste with nuclides exceeding any of the following criteria will be considered ORNL reportable nuclides: Exceeds 10% of an accountable quantity under ORNL NMC&A Plan Report all uranium nuclides present if any U nuclide is reportable under any criteria. Review of Nuclide Tracking Requirements for Transportation 49 CFR Transportation The shipment of radioactive waste is performed in accordance with 49 CFR transportation regulations. Requirements for the listing of specific nuclides on shipping papers and labels (Reference 5) include those nuclides that contribute to 95% of the total A1/A2s. A conservative factor of including nuclides that contribute to 99% of the total A1/A2s is used for the Reportable Nuclide Criteria for ORNL Radioactive Waste Management Activities. Waste with nuclides exceeding any of the following criteria will be considered ORNL reportable nuclides: 3

Contributes to 99% of the total A1/A2 s per 49 CFR 173.433. NRC Uniform Low-Level Radioactive Waste Manifest (540/541 forms) Reference 6, page 20, includes a description of what is considered a significant nuclide for Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 540/541 manifest form purposes. A conservative factor of one order of magnitude below the referenced NRC requirements is used for the Reportable Nuclide Criteria for ORNL Radioactive Waste Management Activities. Waste with nuclides exceeding any of the following criteria will be considered ORNL reportable nuclides: Exceeds 0.001 times the concentration of that nuclide listed in Table 1 of 10 CFR 61.55 Exceeds 0.001 times the smallest concentration of that nuclide listed in Table 2 of 10 CFR 61.55 Exceeds 0.026 megabecquerels/cm 3 Any radionuclide whose activity represents 10% of a Reportable Quantity under Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations Review of Nuclide Tracking Requirements for Offsite Treatment and/or Disposal ORNL ships radioactive waste to a number of offsite facilities for treatment and/or disposal. The acceptance criteria for these various TSDF s were reviewed as described below to determine if there are any unique reportable nuclide criteria requirements. Nevada Nuclear Security Site (NNSS) The NNSS WAC (Reference 1) has three primary reporting requirements. The NNSS definition of TRU includes radionuclides that are alpha-emitting and transuranic with a half-life greater than 20 years. A conservative factor of one order of magnitude below the referenced NNSS requirements is used for the Reportable Nuclide Criteria for ORNL Radioactive Waste Management Activities. Waste with nuclides exceeding any of the following criteria will be considered ORNL reportable nuclides: Exceeds 1 pci/g TRU nuclides Exceeds 0.1 % of NNSS Action Level (Table E-1) Exceeds 0.1 % of the total activity. 4

EnergySolutions Clive, Utah The Clive Bulk Waste Facility Waste Acceptance Criteria (Reference 7) was reviewed and no unique reportable nuclide criteria were identified. EnergySolutions Bear Creek, TN The Bear Creek Waste Acceptance Guideline (WAG) (Reference 8) was reviewed and no unique reportable nuclide criteria were identified. Perma-Fix The Perma-Fix WAC (Reference 9) was reviewed and no unique reportable nuclide criteria were identified. RESULTS A list of reportable nuclide criteria for ORNL waste management activities was developed based on a thorough review of nuclide tracking requirements for onsite management, transportation, and offsite treatment and/or disposal. The list is included as Attachment A. An example of the application of the criteria is included as Attachment B. CONCLUSION This reportable nuclide criteria provides a documented basis for identifying those nuclides that must be tracked throughout the waste management lifecycle for ORNL radioactive waste. ORNL will maintain waste tracking on a nuclide in a specific waste stream or container if it exceeds any of the reportable nuclide criteria. Nuclides in a specific waste stream or container that screen out as non-reportable under all these criteria may be dropped from ORNL waste tracking. 5

REFERENCES 1. NNSS WAC 2. SBMS, Subject Area Facility Hazard Categorization 3. SBMS, Subject Area, Nuclear Criticality Safety 4. SBMS, Subject Area Nuclear Materials Control & Accountability 5. 49 CFR 173.433 6. NUREG/BR-0204, Revision 2, Instructions for Completing NRC s Low-Level Radioactive Waste Manifest 7. Clive WAC 8. Bear Creek WAG 9. Perma-Fix WAC ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Reportable Nuclide Criteria List Attachment B: Reportable Nuclide Evaluation (Example Only) 6

ATTACHMENT A - REPORTABLE NUCLIDE CRITERIA LIST CRITERIA Ref. Exceeds 0.1 % of the total activity 1 Exceeds 1 pci/g TRU nuclides 1 Exceeds 0.1 % of NNSS Action Level (Table E-1) 1 Equal to or Exceeds.0005% HazCat3 SOF 2 Equal to or Exceeds 0.0035 g U-235 FEM 2 Exceeds 1.5e-1 microcuries 2 Report all uranium nuclides present if any U nuclide is reportable under any criteria 4 Exceeds 10 % of an accountable quantity under ORNL NMCA Plan 4 Contributes to 99% of the total A1/A2 s per 49 CFR 173.433 5 Exceeds 10 % of a DOT reportable quantity 6 Exceeds 0.026 MBq/cm 3 6 Exceeds 0.001 times the 10 CFR 61.55 Table 1 concentration 6 Exceeds 0.001 times the smallest concentration of nuclide in 10 CFR 61.55 Table 2 6 7

ATTACHMENT B - REPORTABLE NUCLIDE EVALUATION (Example Only) >0.1% NNSS Action >10% Accounta ble >.001 x Waste Class >.001 Waste Class Table >1 >99% > 0.1 % pci/g >10% >0.026 MBq/c >.0035 >.0005 % g U235 >1.5e 1 Nuclide Ci A2 activity TRU Level RQ? quantity? m3? Table 1? 2? HazCat3 FEM? uci? Mn54 1.58E+03 yes yes yes yes yes yes yes Fe55 1.56E+03 yes yes yes yes yes yes Co57 4.67E+02 yes yes yes yes yes yes V49 4.18E+02 yes yes yes yes yes yes Co58 3.20E+02 yes yes yes yes yes yes Co60 1.85E+02 yes yes yes yes yes yes yes Co56 5.88E+01 yes yes yes yes yes yes Sc46 2.98E+01 yes yes yes yes yes yes H3 2.84E+01 yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes Ta179 2.84E+01 yes yes yes yes yes Lu173 2.16E+01 yes yes yes yes yes yes Cr51 1.90E+01 yes yes yes yes yes W181 1.76E+01 yes yes yes yes yes yes Os185 1.73E+01 yes yes yes yes yes yes Lu172 1.65E+01 yes yes yes yes yes yes Hf172 1.64E+01 yes yes yes yes yes yes Y88 1.24E+01 yes yes yes yes yes yes Ca45 1.09E+01 yes yes yes yes yes yes Re183 9.35E+00 yes yes yes yes yes yes yes Ni63 6.62E+00 yes yes yes yes yes Dy159 5.38E+00 yes yes yes yes yes Hf175 5.29E+00 yes yes yes yes yes S35 5.26E+00 yes yes yes yes yes yes Pt193 5.19E+00 yes yes yes yes Gd153 4.28E+00 yes yes yes yes yes Zr88 3.88E+00 yes yes yes yes yes Na22 3.86E+00 yes yes yes yes yes Fe59 2.90E+00 yes yes yes yes yes Sm145 2.73E+00 yes yes yes yes Gd151 2.18E+00 yes yes yes yes yes Nb91m 2.01E+00 yes yes yes yes yes Pm143 1.89E+00 yes yes Rb83 1.60E+00 yes yes yes Eu149 1.46E+00 yes yes Ar37 1.22E+00 yes yes yes Sr85 1.12E+00 yes yes yes Se75 1.00E+00 yes yes yes Ce139 8.71E 01 yes yes Ge68 4.63E 01 yes yes Zr95 2.45E 01 yes yes Pm144 2.05E 01 yes yes Ru106 1.54E 01 yes yes yes In113m 1.12E 01 yes P33 7.42E 02 yes yes Reportable Uranium? 8

>0.1% NNSS Action >10% Accounta ble >.001 x Waste Class >.001 Waste Class Table >99% > 0.1 % >1 pci/g >10% >0.026 MBq/c >.0035 >.0005 % g U235 >1.5e 1 Nuclide Ci A2 activity TRU Level RQ? quantity? m3? Table 1? 2? HazCat3 FEM? uci? Ir194m 4.19E 02 yes yes W178 3.77E 02 yes yes Pm147 2.99E 02 yes yes K42 2.12E 02 yes Ru103 1.29E 02 yes yes Hg203 1.03E 02 yes yes Eu150 8.48E 03 yes yes yes Te127m 6.02E 03 yes yes Sb124 3.93E 03 yes yes Tc99 2.64E 03 yes yes yes W188 9.81E 04 yes yes Sn121 7.46E 04 yes Tb158 4.29E 04 yes As74 1.83E 04 yes Pd103 5.70E 05 yes Lu177 3.74E 05 yes Dy154 6.58E 06 yes yes Zr93 2.97E 06 yes Sn117m 5.01E 07 yes Sn126 2.50E 07 yes La140 5.92E 08 ** Sn125 4.48E 10 Ni56 5.58E 11 Tb161 4.92E 13 Pt193m 5.69E 16 Y87 1.09E 20 Ga67 3.24E 22 Tc99m 9.91E 24 Cu67 1.58E 28 Br77 4.33E 30 Ba133m 1.43E 46 Re189 8.58E 73 I122 4.88E 91 Xe122 4.86E 91 Pr142 1.06E 92 Gd159 2.17E 96 Co55 1.56E 97 2 significant digits 10 Significant digits Reportable Uranium? Totals (Ci) 4.88E+03 Totals (Ci) 4.8774695997E+03 Reportable 4.88E+03 Reportable 4.8774695996E+03 5.97E 08 Nonreportable Nonreportable 5.9717607081E 08 ** Highlighted cells are determined to be non reportable nuclides 9