Práctica de laboratorio número 6: Non-Rutherford scattering near the MeV 12 C(p,p) 12 C resonance

Similar documents
The Configuration of the Atom: Rutherford s Model

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 5: RBS

Silver Thin Film Characterization

Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry

Energy loss of alpha particles - Prelab questions

Materials Science. Hand axes like this one found in the United Arab Emirates indicate humans left Africa 125,000 years ago.

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 5: RBS. Byungha Shin Dept. of MSE, KAIST

Elastic Recoil Detection Method using DT Neutrons for Hydrogen Isotope Analysis in Fusion Materials. Abstract

Physics 100 PIXE F06

Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry

Atomic Collisions and Backscattering Spectrometry

Institute of Physics & Power Engineering Current Status of the Problem of Cross Section Data for Ion Beam Analysis

Analysis of light elements in solids by elastic recoil detection analysis

State the main interaction when an alpha particle is scattered by a gold nucleus

Characterization of Secondary Emission Materials for Micro-Channel Plates. S. Jokela, I. Veryovkin, A. Zinovev

IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST MERCIFUL AND COMPASSIONATE

RBS - Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry M. Mayer

APPLICATION OF THE NUCLEAR REACTION ANALYSIS FOR AGING INVESTIGATIONS

Au-Ti THIN FILMS DEPOSITED ON GaAs

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 3 Homework 1 Nuclear Phenomenology

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

ELECTRIC FIELD INFLUENCE ON EMISSION OF CHARACTERISTIC X-RAY FROM Al 2 O 3 TARGETS BOMBARDED BY SLOW Xe + IONS

SYSTEM FOR PIXE TRACE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AT MTF. M. Beňo, J. Dobrovodský, D. Vaňa, S. Minárik

Rutherford Scattering

in2p , version 1-28 Nov 2008

Depth profiles of helium and hydrogen in tungsten nano-tendril surface morphology using Elastic Recoil Detection

Nuclear Reaction Analysis (NRA)

Inclusive breakup measurements of the 7 Li+ 119 Sn system.

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PIGE, PIXE AND NAA ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF MINOR ELEMENTS IN STEELS

P627/Chem 542 Surface/Interface Science Spring 2013 Rutherford Backscattering Lab: Answers to Questions

ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS IN CONTROLLED FUSION DEVICES. Marek Rubel

Direct measurement of the 17 O(p,α) 14 N reaction at energies of astrophysical interest at LUNA

Light element IBA by Elastic Recoil Detection and Nuclear Reaction Analysis R. Heller

Recent Activities on Neutron Calibration Fields at FRS of JAERI

Benchmark measurements of non-rutherford proton elastic scattering cross section for boron

Benchmarking experiments for the proton backscattering

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Nuclear Data for Analytical Applications October 2013

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF NEUTRON FIELDS PRODUCED IN PROTON REACTIONS WITH HEAVY TARGETS. Nuclear Physics Institute AS CR, Rez Czech Republic

Light ion recoil detector

Joint ICTP/IAEA Workshop on Advanced Simulation and Modelling for Ion Beam Analysis February 2009

Investigation of the nuclear structure of 17 O at high excitation energy with five-particle transfer reactions

Alpha-Energies of different sources with Multi Channel Analyzer

New application of the quasi-free reaction mechanism to study neutron induced reactions at low energy

Ion-beam techniques. Ion beam. Electrostatic Accelerators. Van de Graaff accelerator Pelletron Tandem Van de Graaff

1. Introduction. Etim I.P. 1, William E. S. 2, Ekwe S.O. 3. Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 71 (2015 ) Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Alpha-energies of different sources with Multi Channel Analyzer (Item No.: P )

Nuclear Reaction Analysis Resonances

Neutron detection efficiency from the 7 Li(p,n) reaction (R405n)

The interaction of radiation with matter

Il picco di Bragg. G. Battistoni INFN Milano. 08/06/2015 G. Battistoni

MEASUREMENT OF HIGH VOLTAGE USING RUTHERFORD BACKSCATTERING SPECTROMETRY. A Thesis CELESTINO PETE ABREGO

Characterization of the 3 MeV Neutron Field for the Monoenergetic Fast Neutron Fluence Standard at the National Metrology Institute of Japan

Flux and neutron spectrum measurements in fast neutron irradiation experiments

Substance Detection using mono-energetic neutrons

Measurement of the n_tof beam profile in the second experimental area (EAR2) using a silicon detector

PoS(NIC XI)019. Low energy beam induced background studies for a. 12 C( 12 C,p) 23 Na reaction cross section measurement

CHARGED PARTICLE INTERACTIONS

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS)

PHY 192 Compton Effect Spring

Materials Analysis Using Fast Ions

Method of active correlations in the experiment 249 Cf+ 48 Ca n

Visit for more fantastic resources. AQA. A Level. A Level Physics. Particle physics (Answers) Name: Total Marks: /30

Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association POB 1533, D Garching, Germany

R&T PROTON DIRECT IONIZATION

HIRA CSI DETECTOR RESPONSE TO LOW ENERGY PROTONS

4- Locate the channel number of the peak centroid with the software cursor and note the corresponding energy. Record these values.

PHITS calculation of the radiation field in HIMAC BIO

Safety Co-ordinator : Patrick Walden, TRIUMF, ext : 7340

Feasibility Studies for the EXL Project at FAIR *

In Situ Observation of Damage Evolution in Polycarbonate under Ion Irradiation with Positrons

A Comparison between Channel Selections in Heavy Ion Reactions

Spectroscopy on Mars!

Geometry Survey of the Time-of-Flight Neutron-Elastic Scattering (Antonella) Experiment

Neutron Backscattering Technique for the Detection of Buried Organic Objects. Angel Humberto Cruz Silva

Measurement of the Ionizing Energy Depositions after Fast Neutron Interactions in Silicon

Passage of particles through matter

Atomic and Nuclear Physics

Emphasis on what happens to emitted particle (if no nuclear reaction and MEDIUM (i.e., atomic effects)

DETECTORS. I. Charged Particle Detectors

The scanning microbeam PIXE analysis facility at NIRS

The 22 Ne(α,n) 25 Mg reaction at astrophysical energies studied via the Trojan Horse Method applied to the 2 H( 25 Mg, α 22 Ne) 1 H reaction

Stopping power for MeV 12 C ions in solids

Fadei Komarov Alexander Kamyshan

Why Does Uranium Alpha Decay?

SIMULATION OF THE LIQUID TARGETS FOR MOLYBDENUM-99 PRODUCTION

Radiation Detection for the Beta- Delayed Alpha and Gamma Decay of 20 Na. Ellen Simmons

Low Energy Nuclear Fusion Reactions in Solids

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Airo International Research Journal October, 2015 Volume VI, ISSN:

Rutherford experiment with MCA

International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison of Ion Beam. Analysis software

hν' Φ e - Gamma spectroscopy - Prelab questions 1. What characteristics distinguish x-rays from gamma rays? Is either more intrinsically dangerous?

Calibration of a 1.7 MV Pelletron Accelerator at the University of Florida. Ralph Kelly. Department of Physics, University of Florida

Alpha-particle Stopping Powers in Air and Argon

Minicourse on Experimental techniques at the NSCL Fragment Separators

Recent results and status of the

Experimental Physics I & II "Junior Lab" Fall Spring 2008

INTRODUCTION TO MEDICAL PHYSICS 1 Quiz #1 Solutions October 6, 2017

Monte Carlo Characterization of a Pulsed Laser-Wakefield Driven Monochromatic X-Ray Source

Transcription:

Práctica de laboratorio número 6: Non-Rutherford scattering near the 1.734 MeV 12 C(p,p) 12 C resonance 1) Scope In this experiment, the yield of protons backscattered from a thin gold foil deposited over a thick graphite substrate (~ 5 µm) is measured as a function of the proton energy in the energy range from 16 182 kev. From the yield of the Au and C (surface) signals, the energy dependence of both cross-sections will be determined and compared to the corresponding Rutherford cross section. 2) Theoretical background At ion energies above the Coulomb barrier, cross-sections for elastic backscattering are strongly dependent on ion energy, and deviate significantly from the classical Rutherford formula. For the elastic scattering reaction 12 C(p,p) 12 C there is a resonance in the cross-section with peak maximum positioned at 1734 kev and FWHM of ~ 4 kev. As non-rutherford cross-sections can be much higher (in some cases up to 1 times) than Rutherford ones, this can be utilized in practical applications to increase the analytical sensitivity of the backscattering technique. The intense resonance for 12 C or 16 O with helium ion beam is a commonly-used tool for depthprofiling carbon and oxygen in various substrates [1,2]. The differential cross-section for backscattered protons at a scattering angle θ is given by Eq. 1: dω ) S (E p, θ) = A S QΩ(θ)N S (1) Where Ep is the incident proton energy, A S is the area under the gold or carbon signals (yield), Q is the number of incident protons, Ω(θ) is the detector solid angle and N S is the number of gold or carbon atoms per unit area (atoms/cm 2 ). In the case of carbon, the area A S will be taken in an interval corresponding to the first 7 nm from the surface (about 2 channels). 3) Materials: 1. 3 MV Tandem accelerator 2. Target: thin Au layer on C substrate 3. PIPS detector 4. Electronic chain (preamplifier+amplifier+adc) 5. PC with Genies MCA software for spectra data acquisition 6. Current integrator 1

4) Methodology Master Interuniversitario en Física Nuclear (216/17) Figure 1 shows the experimental geometry. The measurements must be carried out in a vacuum chamber. The chamber should be light tight as the charged particle detector is sensitive to light (when bias is applied). A collimated proton beam with energy varied from 16 to 182 kev is incident on a thin gold foil (54 µg/cm 2 ) deposited over a thick graphite substrate (~ 5 µm). A particle detector is placed at a backward angle (165 ) to detect the backscattered protons. The proton beam charge is collected by the sample holder that is electrically connected to the current integrator. The secondary electrons emitted from the sample are recollected biasing the sample holder at +2 V using a battery. The backscattering yield for the 12 C(p,p) 12 C reaction is measured between 16 kev and 182 kev in steps of 1 kev. Fig.- 1. Experimental setup for backscattering of protons from the thin gold layer (54 µg/cm 2 ) deposited over a thick graphite substrate (~ 5 µm). All spectra are collected to the same number of incident particles i.e. to the same collected charge in the current integrator (Q = 4 μc in this case). The spectra of protons backscattered from the sample for several proton energies are shown in Figure 2. The peak that appears at higher energy corresponds to the protons backscattered from the Au atoms, while the continuous signal at lower energy comes from collisions with the carbon atoms. As observed, the C yield is very sensitive to the incident proton energy. 2

1 1 162 kev 1 1 1 175 kev 1 1 1 182 kev 1 5 1 15 2 E p (kev) Fig.- 2. Backscattering spectra of protons from Au/C target for several incident energies: a) 162 kev, b) 175 kev, and c) 182 kev. All spectra are recorded with the same number of incident protons (Q = 4 μc). Experimental procedure 1) For each spectrum, integrate the number of counts for the C and the Au signals. For C, the region of interest (ROI) will include only 2 channels starting from the highest carbon signal to integrate only the first 7 nm. 2) From equation 1 and using the answer to questions (2-5), calculate the differential cross sections for C and Au at the several proton energies. 3) Calculate the corresponding Rutherford cross sections for C and Au and compare with your experimental results. Are they similar? Why? 4) Use the SigmaCalc program [3] to calculate the differential 12 C(p,p) 12 C cross section and compare with your experimental results. Explain the differences. 5) Fill Table 1 and represent the data. 3

Ep (KeV) AAu (counts ) dω ) Au,exp dω ) Au,Ruth AC (counts ) dω ) C,exp dω ) C,Sigmacal dω ) C,Ruth 16 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 17 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 18 181 182 Additional questions: Question 1: Explain why the secondary electrons ejected from the sample must be collected during the experiment. Question 2: Knowing that the mass density of Au is ρ = 19.31 g/cm 3, calculate the atomic density (in units of 1 15 at/cm 2 ) and the physical thickness of the 54 µg /cm 2 Au layer. Question 3: Knowing that the mass density of C is ρ = 2.267 g/cm 3, calculate the atomic density (in units of 1 15 at/cm 2 ) corresponding to the thickness of 7 nm. 4

Question 4: Calculate the solid angle of the detector knowing that the distance sample-detector is 5 cm and the detector area is 1 mm 2. Question 5: Calculate the number of incident protons corresponding to an integrated charge of Q = 4 μc References [1] M. Berti.et al, 12 C(α,α) 12 C Resonant Elastic Scattering at 5.7 MeV as a Tool for Carbon Quantification in Silicon-based Heterostructures, Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 143 (1998) 357. [2] Y. Miyagawa et al, Oxygen depth profiling in TiO xsio 2 prepared by sol-gel method using 16 O(α,α) 16 O resonant backscattering, Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 136-138 (1998) 557. [3] SigmaCalc: http://sigmacalc.iate.obninsk.ru/ Appendix: Rutherford cross section The Rutherford cross section for backscattering in the laboratory system is given by: where is the scattering angle, E is the energy of the projectile, Z 1 and M 1 are the nuclear charge and the mass of the projectile, respectively, and Z 2 and M 2 are the nuclear charge and the mass of the target atom, respectively. 5