On some refinements of companions of Fejér s inequality via superquadratic functions

Similar documents
Bulletin of the. Iranian Mathematical Society

ON SOME NEW INEQUALITIES OF HADAMARD TYPE INVOLVING h-convex FUNCTIONS. 1. Introduction. f(a) + f(b) f(x)dx b a. 2 a

The Hadamard s Inequality for s-convex Function

On new Hermite-Hadamard-Fejer type inequalities for p-convex functions via fractional integrals

Some estimates on the Hermite-Hadamard inequality through quasi-convex functions

Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions

On New Inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard-Fejer Type for Harmonically Quasi-Convex Functions Via Fractional Integrals

NEW INEQUALITIES OF SIMPSON S TYPE FOR s CONVEX FUNCTIONS WITH APPLICATIONS. := f (4) (x) <. The following inequality. 2 b a

GENERALIZATIONS OF WEIGHTED TRAPEZOIDAL INEQUALITY FOR MONOTONIC MAPPINGS AND ITS APPLICATIONS. (b a)3 [f(a) + f(b)] f x (a,b)

f (a) + f (b) f (λx + (1 λ)y) max {f (x),f (y)}, x, y [a, b]. (1.1)

S. S. Dragomir. 2, we have the inequality. b a

Research Article Fejér and Hermite-Hadamard Type Inequalities for Harmonically Convex Functions

Co-ordinated s-convex Function in the First Sense with Some Hadamard-Type Inequalities

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

ON THE WEIGHTED OSTROWSKI INEQUALITY

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

New Integral Inequalities of the Type of Hermite-Hadamard Through Quasi Convexity

Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type inequalities for harmonically convex functions via fractional integrals

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 55 (130) (2005), , Abbotsford. 1. Introduction

ON A CONVEXITY PROPERTY. 1. Introduction Most general class of convex functions is defined by the inequality

On the Generalized Weighted Quasi-Arithmetic Integral Mean 1

S. S. Dragomir. 1. Introduction. In [1], Guessab and Schmeisser have proved among others, the following companion of Ostrowski s inequality:

Keywords : Generalized Ostrowski s inequality, generalized midpoint inequality, Taylor s formula.

n-points Inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard Type for h-convex Functions on Linear Spaces

The Hadamard s inequality for quasi-convex functions via fractional integrals

Some Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for functions whose exponentials are convex

Hermite-Hadamard Type Inequalities for the Functions whose Second Derivatives in Absolute Value are Convex and Concave

New general integral inequalities for quasiconvex functions

AN INTEGRAL INEQUALITY FOR CONVEX FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS IN NUMERICAL INTEGRATION

New Integral Inequalities for n-time Differentiable Functions with Applications for pdfs

SOME INEQUALITIES FOR THE DISPERSION OF A RANDOM VARIABLE WHOSE PDF IS DEFINED ON A FINITE INTERVAL

arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 28 Jan 2013

ON AN INTEGRATION-BY-PARTS FORMULA FOR MEASURES

Ostrowski Grüss Čebyšev type inequalities for functions whose modulus of second derivatives are convex 1

Integral inequalities for n times differentiable mappings

An inequality related to η-convex functions (II)

Research Article On The Hadamard s Inequality for Log-Convex Functions on the Coordinates

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO RIEMANN-STIELTJES INTEGRAL MEANS

GENERALIZED ABSTRACTED MEAN VALUES

On the Co-Ordinated Convex Functions

A unified generalization of perturbed mid-point and trapezoid inequalities and asymptotic expressions for its error term

INEQUALITIES FOR GENERALIZED WEIGHTED MEAN VALUES OF CONVEX FUNCTION

ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF INTERMEDIATE POINTS IN CERTAIN MEAN VALUE THEOREMS. II

TRAPEZOIDAL TYPE INEQUALITIES FOR n TIME DIFFERENTIABLE FUNCTIONS

Improvement of Ostrowski Integral Type Inequalities with Application

RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE AND CAPUTO FRACTIONAL APPROXIMATION OF CSISZAR S f DIVERGENCE

NEW HERMITE HADAMARD INEQUALITIES VIA FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS, WHOSE ABSOLUTE VALUES OF SECOND DERIVATIVES IS P CONVEX

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

Relative Strongly h-convex Functions and Integral Inequalities

Communications inmathematicalanalysis Volume 6, Number 2, pp (2009) ISSN

Parametrized inequality of Hermite Hadamard type for functions whose third derivative absolute values are quasi convex

SOME INTEGRAL INEQUALITIES OF GRÜSS TYPE

Hadamard-Type Inequalities for s Convex Functions I

Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas Volumen 41 (2007), páginas 1 13

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

Some inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for n times differentiable (ρ, m) geometrically convex functions

Research Article On New Inequalities via Riemann-Liouville Fractional Integration

ON PERTURBED TRAPEZOIDAL AND MIDPOINT RULES. f (t) dt

arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 11 Jul 2011

A basic logarithmic inequality, and the logarithmic mean

ON THE INEQUALITY OF THE DIFFERENCE OF TWO INTEGRAL MEANS AND APPLICATIONS FOR PDFs

The Bochner Integral and the Weak Property (N)

MonotonicBehaviourofRelativeIncrementsofPearsonDistributions

Some new integral inequalities for n-times differentiable convex and concave functions

A short introduction to local fractional complex analysis

Bounds for the Riemann Stieltjes integral via s-convex integrand or integrator

Theoretical foundations of Gaussian quadrature

ON COMPANION OF OSTROWSKI INEQUALITY FOR MAPPINGS WHOSE FIRST DERIVATIVES ABSOLUTE VALUE ARE CONVEX WITH APPLICATIONS

A Companion of Ostrowski Type Integral Inequality Using a 5-Step Kernel with Some Applications

Euler, Ioachimescu and the trapezium rule. G.J.O. Jameson (Math. Gazette 96 (2012), )

Advanced Calculus: MATH 410 Notes on Integrals and Integrability Professor David Levermore 17 October 2004

0 N. S. BARNETT AND S. S. DRAGOMIR Using Gruss' integrl inequlity, the following pertured trpezoid inequlity in terms of the upper nd lower ounds of t

ON CO-ORDINATED OSTROWSKI AND HADAMARD S TYPE INEQUALITIES FOR CONVEX FUNCTIONS II

AN INEQUALITY OF OSTROWSKI TYPE AND ITS APPLICATIONS FOR SIMPSON S RULE AND SPECIAL MEANS. I. Fedotov and S. S. Dragomir

Research Article On Hermite-Hadamard Type Inequalities for Functions Whose Second Derivatives Absolute Values Are s-convex

LYAPUNOV-TYPE INEQUALITIES FOR NONLINEAR SYSTEMS INVOLVING THE (p 1, p 2,..., p n )-LAPLACIAN

1 The Lagrange interpolation formula

Review on Integration (Secs ) Review: Sec Origins of Calculus. Riemann Sums. New functions from old ones.

Chapter 4. Lebesgue Integration

WEIGHTED INTEGRAL INEQUALITIES OF OSTROWSKI, 1 (b a) 2. f(t)g(t)dt. provided that there exists the real numbers m; M; n; N such that

WENJUN LIU AND QUÔ C ANH NGÔ

f(x)dx . Show that there 1, 0 < x 1 does not exist a differentiable function g : [ 1, 1] R such that g (x) = f(x) for all

A Generalized Inequality of Ostrowski Type for Twice Differentiable Bounded Mappings and Applications

Several Answers to an Open Problem

The Riemann Integral

RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE FRACTIONAL SIMPSON S INEQUALITIES THROUGH GENERALIZED (m, h 1, h 2 )-PREINVEXITY

Improvements of the Hermite-Hadamard inequality

Generalized Hermite-Hadamard-Fejer type inequalities for GA-convex functions via Fractional integral

LYAPUNOV-TYPE INEQUALITIES FOR THIRD-ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

EÜFBED - Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi Cilt-Sayı: 3-1 Yıl:

Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type inequalities for convex functions via fractional integrals

A Note on Feng Qi Type Integral Inequalities

ON THE C-INTEGRAL BENEDETTO BONGIORNO

Riemann Sums and Riemann Integrals

For a continuous function f : [a; b]! R we wish to define the Riemann integral

Hadamard-Type Inequalities for s-convex Functions

Improvement of Grüss and Ostrowski Type Inequalities

Transcription:

Proyecciones Journl o Mthemtics Vol. 3, N o, pp. 39-33, December. Universidd Ctólic del Norte Antogst - Chile On some reinements o compnions o Fejér s inequlity vi superqudrtic unctions Muhmmd Amer Lti University o Hil, Sudi Arbi Received : December. Accepted : September Abstrct In this pper some compnions o Fejér s inequlity or superqudrtic unctions re given, we lso get reinements o some known results proved in [8]. Subjclss : [] 6D5. Keywords : Hermite-Hdmrd Inequlity, convex unction, Fejér inequlity, superqudrtic unction.

3 Muhmmd Amer Lti. Introduction Let 6= I R,, b I with <b,let : I R be convex unction nd p :[, b] R be non-negtive integrble nd symmetric bout x = +b. The ollowing two inequlities re o gret signiicnce in literture: the irst known s Hermite-Hdmrd inequlity: + b (.) (x)dx ()+(b) b with the reversed inequlity or the concve unction, nd the second, known s Fejér s inequlity: (.) Z + b b p(x)dx (x)p(x)dx ()+(b) p(x)dx. These inequlities ttrcted the ttention o mny mthemticins over the decdes nd they generlize, improve nd extend these inequlities in number o wys, see [6, 7, 8, 9,, 9]. Let us now deine some mppings nd quote the results estblished by K.L. Tseng, S. R. Hwng nd S.S. Drgomir in [8]: G(t) = L p (t) = t +( t) + b H(t) = b I(t) = + Zb L p (t) = (b ) t x + b t x + + tx +( t) + b tb +( t) + b dx, +( t) + b +( t) + b p(x)dx,, [ (t +( t) x)+ (tb +( t) x)] p(x)dx, Zb [ (t +( t) x)+ (tb +( t) x)] dx

Compnions o Fejér s Inequlity For Superqudrtic Functions 3 nd S p (t) = + tb +( t) x + t +( t) x + + + tb +( t) x + b t +( t) x + b p(x)dx, where :[, b] R is convex unction nd p :[, b] R is non-negtive integrble nd symmetric bout x = +b, t [, ]. Now we quote some results rom [8]: Theorem. [8] Let, p, I be deined s bove. Then:. The ollowing inequlity holds: (.3) Z + b b p (x) dx " Z +b 3+b Z # +3b (x)p(x b)dx + (x)p(x b)dx +b Z I (t) dt " Z + b b p (x) dx + x + + x + b # p (x) dx.. I is dierentible on [, b] nd p is bounded on [, b], thenorll t [, ] we hve the inequlity x + x + b + p (x) dx I(t) (.) " ()+(b) ( t) (b ) where kpk =sup p (x). x [,b] # (x)dx kpk,

3 Muhmmd Amer Lti 3. I is dierentible on [, b], then or ll t [, ] we hve the inequlity ()+(b) (.5) p (x) dx I(t) ( (b) ()) (b ) Theorem. [8] Let, p, G, I be deined s bove. Then:. The ollowing inequlity holds or ll t [, ] : p (x) dx. (.6) I(t) G(t) p(x)dx.. I is dierentible on [, b] nd p is bounded on [, b], thenorll t [, ] we hve the inequlity (.7) Z + b b I(t) p (x) dx (b )[G(t) H(t)] kpk, where kpk =sup p (x). x [,b] Theorem 3. [8] Let, p, G, I, S p be deined s bove. Then we hve the ollowing results:. S p is convex on [, ].. The ollowing inequlities hold or ll t [, ] : (.8) G(t) p (x) dx S p (t) ( t) x + + x + b p (x) dx

Compnions o Fejér s Inequlity For Superqudrtic Functions 33 +t ()+(b) p (x) dx ()+(b) p (x) dx, (.9) I( t) S p (t) nd I(t)+I( t) (.) 3. The ollowing equlity holds: S p (t). (.) sup S p (t) =S p () = ()+(b) x [,] p (x) dx. They used the ollowing Lemm to prove the bove results: Lemm. [7, p. 3] :[, b] R be convex unction nd let A C D B b with A + B = C + D. Then (A)+(B) (C)+(D). Let us now recll the deinition, some o the properties nd results relted to superqudrtic unctions to be used in the sequel. Deinition 5. [3, Deintion.] Let I =[,] or [, ) be n intervl in R. A unction : I R is superqudrtic i or ech x in I there exists rel number C(x) such tht (.) (y) (x) C(x)(y x)+ ( y x ) or ll y I. I is superqudrtic then is clled subqudrtic. For exmples o superqudrtic unctions see [, p. 9]. Theorem 6. [3, Theorem.3] The inequlity Z Z Z (.3) gd (g(s)) g(s) gd d(s) holds or ll probbility mesure nd ll non-negtive -integrble unction g, i nd only i is superqudrtic.

3 Muhmmd Amer Lti The ollowing discrete version o the bove theorem will be helpul in the sequel o the pper: Lemm 7. [, Lemm A, p.9] Suppose tht is superqudrtic. Let x r, r n, ndlet x = P n r= λ r x r where λ r nd P n r= λ r =. Then nx nx (.) λ r (x r ) ( x)+ λ r ( x r x ). r= The ollowing Lemm shows tht positive superqudrtic unctions re lso convex: Lemm 8. [3, Lemm.] Let be superqudrtic unction with C(x) s in Deinition. Then. ().. I () = () = then C(x) = (x) whenever is dierentible t x>. r= 3. I, then convex nd () = () =. In [] converse o Jensen s inequlity or superqudrtic unctions ws proved: Theorem 9. [, Theorem ] Let (Ω,A,) be mesurble spce with < (Ω) < nd let :[, ) R be superqudrtic unction. I g : Ω [m, M] [, ) is such tht g, g L (), thenwehveor ḡ = (Ω) (.5) R gd, Z (Ω) (g)d M ḡ M m (m)+ ḡ m M m (M) Z (Ω) M m ((M g) (g m)+(g m) (M g)) d. The discrete version o this theorem is: Theorem. [, Theorem ] Let :[, ) R be superqudrtic unction. Let (x,...,x n ) be n n-tuple in [m, M] n ( m M< ), nd (p,...,p n ) be non-negtive n-tuple such tht P n = P n i= p i >. Denote x = P n P ni= p i x i,then

Compnions o Fejér s Inequlity For Superqudrtic Functions 35 (.6) nx P n i= p i (x i ) M x x m (m)+ M m M m (M) P n (M m) nx p i [(M x i ) (x i m)+(x i m) (M x i )] i= For recent results on Fejér nd Hermite-Hdmrd type inequlities or superqudrtic unctions, we reer interested reders to [], [5] nd []. In this pper we del with mppings G(t), I(t), S p (t) ndl(t) when is superqudrtic unction. In cse when superqudrtic unction is lso non-negtive nd hence convex we get reinements o some prts o Theorem, Theorem nd o Theorem 3.. Min Results In this section we prove our min results by using the sme techniques s used in [7] nd []. Moreover, we ssume tht ll the considered integrls in this section exist. In order to prove our min results we go through some clcultions. From Lemm nd Theorem 6 or n =, we get tht (z) M z M m (m)+ z m M m (M) M z z m (z m) (M z) M m M m (.) nd (M+m z) z m M m (m)+ M z M m (M) z m M m (M z) M z M m (z m) (.) hold or superqudrtic unction, m z M, m<m. Thereore rom (.) nd (.), we hve (z)+(m +m z) (m)+(m) z m M m (.3) Now or t ollowing inequlities: (M z) M z M m (z m). +b nd x, we obtin rom (.3) the

36 Muhmmd Amer Lti By setting z = +b 3(+b),M = x,m= x + +b in (.3), we hve tht + b (.) x + + b 3( + b) + x + b x holds. Also, by replcing z = x + +b in (.3), we get tht,m = tx+( t) +b +b,m= t +( t) x x + + b t + b +( t) x + tx +( t) + b + b (.5) t x holds. Further, or z = 3(+b) x +b,m = t +( t)( + b x), m = t ( + b x)+( t) +b in (.3), we observe tht 3( + b) x t ( + b x)+( t) + b (.6) + t + b + b +( t)( + b x) t x holds. Agin, or z = t +b +( t) x, M = +b,m = x in (.3), we observe tht t + b +( t) x + tx +( t) + b (.7) + b + b + b (x)+ t ( t) x ( t) t x holds. Finlly, by setting z = t ( + b x)+( t) +b +b,m = +b x, m = in (.3), we get tht

Compnions o Fejér s Inequlity For Superqudrtic Functions 37 (.8) t ( + b x)+( t) + b + b + t + b +( t)( + b x) + b + ( + b x) t ( t) ( t) + b t x x holds. Now we re redy to stte nd prove our min results bsed on the clcultions done bove. Theorem. Let be superqudrtic integrble unction on [,b] nd p(x) be non-negtive integrble nd symmetric bout x = +b, <b. Let I be deined s bove, then we hve the ollowing inequlities: (.9) Z + b b p (x) dx " Z +b 3+b (x)p(x b)dx Z +3b # + +b (x)p(x b)dx (b x) p(x)dx, (.) nd (.) " Z +b Z 3+b Z # +3b (x)p(x b)dx + (x)p(x b)dx +b Z I(t)dt Z I(t)dt " Z + b b t b x p (x) dx + p (x) dtdx x + x + b + p (x) dx Z ( t) t b x p (x) dtdx.

38 Muhmmd Amer Lti Proo. Using simple techniques o integrtion nd by the ssumptions on p, wehve Z + b b Z +b Z + b p (x) dx = p(x )dtdx. Thereore rom (.), we get tht Z + b b (.) p (x) dx Z +b Z x + + b 3( + b) + x p(x )dtdx Z +b Z + b x p(x )dtdx. But (.3) Z +b Z x + + b 3( + b) + x p(x )dtdx = " Z +b 3+b Z +b = [(x)+( + b x)] p(x b)dx 3+b Z +3b # (x)p(x b)dx + +b (x)p(x b)dx. From (.), (.3) nd by the chnge o vrible x x+, we get (.9). From (.5), (.6) nd (.3), we hve (.) " Z +b 3+b Z # +3b (x) p (x b) dx + (x) p (x b) dx +b

Compnions o Fejér s Inequlity For Superqudrtic Functions 39 ³ + + - R +b But Z (.5) Z +b Z t + b +( t) x + t ( + b x)+( t) +b ³ t +b +( t)( + b x) R I(t)dt = i p (x ) dtdx ³³ t ³ +b x p (x ) dtdx. Z +b Z t + b +( t) x + tx +( t) + b tx +( t) + b + t ( + b x)+( t) + b ³ i + t +b +( t)( + b x) p (x ) dtdx. From (.) nd (.5), we get tht (.6) " Z +3b 3+b Z # +3b (x) p (x b) dx + (x) p (x b) dx 3+b Z Z +b I(t)dt Z t + b x p (x ) dtdx. By the chnge o vribles t t nd x x+ in (.6), we get (.). From (.7), (.8) nd (.5), we hve Z (.7) I(t)dt Z Z +b (x)+ + b + b t ( t) x

3 Muhmmd Amer Lti ( t) But " Z + b b (.8) + b t x + ( + b x) p (x ) dtdx. p (x) dx + x + + x + b # p (x) dx = Z +b Z (x)+ + b + ( + b x) p (x ) dtdx. From (.7), (.8) nd by the chnge o vribles x x+ nd t t, we get (.). This completes the proo o the theorem s well. Remrk. I the superqudrtic unction is non-negtive nd hence convex, then rom (.9) we get reinement o the irst inequlity o (.3) in Theorem ; rom (.) we get reinement o the middle inequlity o (.3) in Theorem nd rom (.) we get reinement o the lst inequlity o (.3) in Theorem. Corollry 3. Let be superqudrtic integrble unction on [,b]. p(x) = b, x [, b] nd <b,thenwehve + b (.9) b (.) nd (.) where Z +3b 3+b b (x)dx Z Z Z +3b 3+b (x)dx b H(t)dt b Z H(t)dt " + b + b b H(t) = b Z ( t) t b x tx +( t) + b (b x) dx, t b x # (x)dx dtdx, dx, t [, ]. I dtdx

Compnions o Fejér s Inequlity For Superqudrtic Functions 3 Proo. I p(x) = b, x [, b], then I(t) = H(t), t [, ], nd thereore the proo o the corollry ollows directly rom the bove theorem. Remrk. I the superqudrtic unction is non-negtive nd thereore convex, then the inequlities in Corollry reine the inequlities in (.3) o Theorem B rom [8, p. ]. To proceed to our next result, we go gin through the similr clcultions s given beore Theorem 7. For x +b, t [, ],wehvetht t +( t) + b tx +( t) + b t ( + b x)+( t) + b tb +( t) + b b. Thereore, by replcing z = tx +( t) +b t +( t) +b in (.3), we get tht (.) t( + b x)+( t) + b tb +( t) + b (x ) b + +,M = tb +( t) +b,m= tx +( t) + b t +( t) + b (b x) (t(b x)) (t(x )) b holds. Now we re redy to stte nd prove our next result bsed on the bove clcultions. Theorem 5. Let be superqudrtic integrble unction on [,b] nd p(x) be non-negtive integrble nd symmetric bout x = +b, <b. Let I nd G be deined s bove, then the ollowing inequlity holds or ll t [, ] : x b x (.3) I(t) G(t) p (x) dx b t + b x x t p(x)dx. b

3 Muhmmd Amer Lti Proo. Using simple techniques o integrtion nd by the ssumptions on p, we hve tht the ollowing identity holds or ll t [, ]: (.) G(t) + p(x)dx = Z +b tb +( t) + b t +( t) + b p(x )dx. Arguing similrly s in obtining (.5), by using (.) nd (.), we get tht (.5) I(t) G(t) p(x)dx Z +b (x ) b (t(b x)) + (b x) b (t(x )) p(x )dx, or ll [, ]. By the chnge o vrible x x+ in (.5), we get (.3). This completes the proo o the theorem. Remrk 6. I the superqudrtic unction is non-negtive nd hence convex, then the inequlity (.3) represents reinement o the inequlity (.6) in Theorem. Corollry 7. Let be superqudrtic integrble unction on [,b], let p(x) = b, < b nd G, H be deined s bove. Then or ll t [, ], we hve the ollowing inequlity (.6) H(t) G(t) (b ) + b x b t x b t x b x dx. Proo. This is direct consequence o the bove theorem, since or p(x) = b, x [, b], I(t) =H(t), or ll t [, ]. Remrk 8. I the superqudrtic unction is non-negtive nd hence convex, then the inequlity (.6) represents reinement o the inequlity (.6) in [8, Theorem C, p. ].

Compnions o Fejér s Inequlity For Superqudrtic Functions 33 Now gin we give some clcultions or our next result. For t +b nd x, we obtin rom (.3) the ollowing inequlities: By setting m = t +( t)x, M = t +( t)( + b x) ndz = t +( t) +b in (.3), we obseve tht t +( t) + b (t +( t)x)+(t +( t)( + b x)) + b (.7) ( t) x holds. Also, by replcing m = tb +( t)x, M = tb +( t)( + b x) nd z = tb +( t) +b in (.3), we get tht tb +( t) + b (tb +( t)x)+(tb +( t)( + b x)) (.8) holds. + b ( t) x Theorem 9. Let be superqudrtic integrble unction on [,b] nd p(x) be non-negtive integrble nd symmetric bout x = +b, <b. Let S p nd G be deined s bove, then the ollowing inequlity holds or ll t [, ] : (.9) G(t) p(x)dx S p (t) ( t) b x p(x)dx. Proo. By the simple techniques o integrtion nd by the ssumptions on p, we hve the ollowing identity or ll t [, ]: (.3) S p (t) = Z +b [(t +( t)x)+(t +( t)( + b x)) +(tb +( t)x)+(tb +( t)( + b x))] p(x )dx.

3 Muhmmd Amer Lti From (.7), (.8) nd (.3), we hve tht Z +b t +( t) + b + (.3) tb +( t) + b p(x )dx Z +b + b S p (t) ( t) x p(x )dx, holds or ll t [, ]. From (.) nd by the chnge o vrible x +x, we get rom (.3) tht G(t) p(x)dx S p (t) ( t) b x p(x)dx, or ll t [, ]. Which is (.9) nd this completes the proo o the theorem s well. Remrk. The result o the bove theorem reines the irst inequlity o Theorem 3, when superqudrtic unction is non-negtive nd hence convex. Corollry. Let be superqudrtic integrble unction on [,b] nd let p(x) = b, x [, b], <b. Let G be deined s bove, then the ollowing inequlity holds or ll t [, ] : (.3) G(t) L(t) b ( t) b x dx. Proo. Since or p(x) = b, x [, b], S p(t) =L p (t) =L(t), or ll t [, b]. Thereore the proo o the crollry ollows directly rom the bove theorem. 3. Inequlities or dierentible superqudrtic unctions In this section we give results when is dierentible superqudrtic unction. Those results give reinements o (.) nd (.5) in Theorem ndreine (.7) o Theorem when superqudrtic unction is nonnegtive nd hence convex. Here we quote very importnt result which will be helpul in the sequel o the pper.

Compnions o Fejér s Inequlity For Superqudrtic Functions 35 Theorem. [, Theorem, p. 5] Let be superqudrtic integrble unction on [,b] nd p(x) be non-negtive integrble nd symmetric bout x = +b, <b.letibe deined s bove nd let p be integrble on [, b], thenor s t, t>, we hve the ollowing inequlity: (3.) t + s I(s) I(t) t s t (b x) p (x) dx t s t + s t (b x) p (x) dx. Now we stte nd prove the irst result o this section. Theorem. Let be superqudrtic unction on [,b] nd p(x) be nonnegtive integrble nd symmetric bout x = +b, <b. Let be dierentible on [, b] such tht () = () = nd p is bounded on [, b], then the ollowing inequlities hold or ll t [, ]: x + x + b (3.) + p(x)dx I(t) " Z # ()+(b) b ( t) (b ) (x)dx kpk ( t) b x where kpk =sup p (x) nd x [,b] Z ()+(b) b (3.3) p (x) dx I(t) Proo. Z +b (3.) b p(x)dx p(x)dx, ( (b) ()) (b ) t By integrtion by prts, we hve tht + b x ( + b x) (x) dx = b x p(x)dx. x + b (x)dx

36 Muhmmd Amer Lti = ()+(b) (b ) (x)dx. Using the substitution rules or integrtion, under the ssumptions on p, wehve (3.5) x + + x + b p(x)dx = +b x + p(x)dx x + nd (3.6) = Z +b I(t) = + + [(x)+( + b x)] p(x )dx t +b x = Z +b t x + +( t) + b +( t) + b p(x)dx tx +( t) + b t( + b x)+( t) + b or ll t [, ]. Now by the ssumptions on, wehvetht (3.7) (x) tx +( t) + b t( + b x)+( t) + b + b ( t) + b ( t) p(x )dx, p(x )+[( + b x) p(x ) x ( + b x) (x) p(x ) x p(x )

Compnions o Fejér s Inequlity For Superqudrtic Functions 37 + b ( t) x [ ( + b x) (x)] kpk h or ll t [, ] nd x + b ( t), +b i. x p (x ), From (3.), (3.5), (3.6) nd (3.7) nd by the chnge o vrible x +x, we get (3.). By the ssumptions on nd rom Lemm 3, we get tht ³ () +b b () b nd ³ (b) +b b (b) b. Adding these inequlities we get tht ³ ()+(b) + b (b) () (b ) b. Thus Z ()+(b) b Z + b b (3.8) p (x) dx p (x) dx ³ () (b) (b ) b p (x) dx. From (3.), or s =,wehve Z + b b (3.9) p (x) dx I(t) or ll t [, ]. From (3.8) nd (3.9), we get (3.3). theorem. t b x p(x)dx, This completes the proo o the Remrk 3. The inequlities (3.) nd (3.3) reine the inequlities (.) nd (.5) in Theorem, when the superqudrtic unction is non-negtive nd thereore convex.

38 Muhmmd Amer Lti Corollry. Let be superqudrtic unction on [,b] nd dierentible on [, b] such tht () = () =. I p(x) = b,thenwehvethe ollowing inequlities: (3.) (b ) x + + x + b dx H(t) nd t " ()+(b) (b ) b b ( t) b x # (x)dx dx (3.) ()+(b) H(t) ( (b) ()) (b ) b dx or ll t [, ]. b t b x dx, Now we give our lst result nd summrize the results relted to it in the remrk ollowed by Theorem. Theorem 5. Let be superqudrtic unction on [,b] nd p(x) be nonnegtive integrble nd symmetric bout x = +b, <b. Let be dierentible on [, b] such tht () = () = nd p is bounded on [, b], then or ll t [, ] we hve the inequlity: Z + b b (3.) I(t) p (x) dx (b )[G(t) H(t)] kpk t (b x) p(x)dx, where kpk =sup p (x). x [,b]

Compnions o Fejér s Inequlity For Superqudrtic Functions 39 Proo. (3.3) By integrtion by prts, we observe tht Z +b t x + b + b + x = t x + b tx +( t) + b t ( + b x)+( t) + b tx +( t) + b dx dx =(b ) G(t) H(t), hold or sll t [, ]. Under the ssumptions on, wehvetht (3.) tx +( t) + b + b p(x ) + t ( + b x)+( t) + b t x + b + b +t x tx +( t) + b + b t ( + b x)+( t) + b t + b x p(x ) p(x ) p(x ) p(x ) + b = t x t ( + b x)+( t) + b tx +( t) + b p(x ) t + b x p(x ) + b t x t ( + b x)+( t) + b

33 Muhmmd Amer Lti tx +( t) + b kpk t + b x p(x ) hold or ll t [, ] nd x h h, +b i i. Integrting (3.) over x on, +b, using (3.3), by the chnge o vrible x x+, under the ssumptions on p, we get (3.). This completes the prooothetheorem. Remrk 6. The result o Theorem reines (.7) o Theorem, when superqudrtic unction is non-negtive nd thereore convex. Corollry 7. Let be superqudrtic unction on [,b]. Let be dierentible on [, b] such tht () = () =. I p(x) = b, x [, b], then (3.5) + b H(t) [G(t) H(t)] b t b x dx, or ll t [, ]. Reerences [] S. Abrmovich, S. Bnić, M. Mtić, J. Pečrić, Jensen Steensen s nd relted inequlities or superqudrtic unctions, Mth. Ineq. Appl.,, pp. 3, (8). [] S. Abrmovich, J. Brić, J. Pečrić, Fejér nd Hermite-Hdmrd type inequlities or superqudrtic unctions, Mth. J. Anl. Appl., 3, pp. 8-56, (8). [3] S. Abrmovich, G. Jmeson, G. Sinnmon, Reining Jensen s inequlity, Bull. Mth. Soc. Sci. Mth. Roumnie (N.S.) 7 (95), pp. 3, ().

Compnions o Fejér s Inequlity For Superqudrtic Functions 33 [] S. Bnić, J. Pečrić, S. Vrošnec, Superqudrtic unctions nd reinements o some clssicl inequlities, J. Koren Mth. Soc. 5, pp. 53 55, (8). [5] S. Bnić, Superqudrtic unctions, PhD thesis, Zgreb (in Crotin), (7). [6] S. S. Drgomir, Two mppings in connection to Hdmrd s inequlities, J. Mth. Anl. Appl., 67, pp. 9 56, (99). [7] S. S. Drgomir, Further properties o some mppings ssocited with Hermite-Hdmrd inequlities, Tmkng. J. Mth., 3 (), pp. 5 57, (3). [8] S. S. Drgomir, Y.J. Cho nd S.S. Kim, Inequlities o Hdmrd s type or Lipschitzin mppings nd their pplictions, J. Mth. Anl. Appl., 5, pp. 89 5, (). [9] S. S. Drgomir, D.S. Milošević nd J. Sándor, On some reinements o Hdmrd s inequlities nd pplictions, Univ. Belgrd. Publ. Elek. Fk. Sci. Mth.,, pp. 3, (993). [] L. Fejér, Über die Fourierreihen, II, Mth. Nturwiss. Anz Ungr. Akd. Wiss.,, pp. 369 39, (96). (In Hungrin). [] Ming-In Ho, Fejer inequlities or Wright-convex unctions, JIPAM. J. Inequl. Pure Appl. Mth. 8 (), (7), rticle 9. [] J. Hdmrd, Étude sur les propriétés des onctions entières en prticulier d une unction considérée pr Riemnn J. Mth. Pures nd Appl., 58, pp. 7-5, (983). [3] M. A. Lti, On some reinements o Fejér type inequlities vi superqudrtic unctions.(to pper) [] M. A. Lti, On some new Fejér-type inequlities or superqudrtic unctions. (to pper) [5] K. L. Tseng, S. R. Hwng nd S.S. Drgomir, On some new inequlities o Hermite-Hdmrd- Fejér type involving convex unctions, Demonstrtio Mth., XL (), pp. 5 6, (7). [6] K. L. Tseng, S. R. Hwng nd S.S. Drgomir, Fejér-type Inequlities (I), (Submitted) Preprint RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. (9), No., Article 5. [Online http://www.st.vu.edu.u/rgmia/vn.sp.].

33 Muhmmd Amer Lti [7] K. L. Tseng, S.R. Hwng nd S.S. Drgomir, Fejér-type Inequlities (II), (Submitted) Preprint RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. (9), Supplement, Article 6, pp.-. [Online http://www.st.vu.edu.u/rgmia/v(e).sp.]. [8] K. L. Tseng, S. R. Hwng nd S.S. Drgomir, Some compnions o Fejér s inequlity or convex unctions, (Submitted) Preprint RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. (9), Supplement, Article 9, pp.-. [Online http://www.st.vu.edu.u/rgmia/v(e).sp.]. [9] G.S. Yng nd K.L. Tseng, Inequlities o Hermite-Hdmrd-Fejér type or convex unctions nd Lipschitzin unctions, Tiwnese J. Mth., 7(3), pp. 33, (3). M. A. Lti Deprtment o Mthemtics, University o Hil, Hil, Sudi Arbi e-mil : m mer lti@hotmil.com