Heavy charged particle passage through matter

Similar documents
PHYS 352. Charged Particle Interactions with Matter. Intro: Cross Section. dn s. = F dω

Interaction of Particles with Matter

Detectors in Nuclear Physics (48 hours)

Particle Interactions in Detectors

Particle Detectors. How to See the Invisible

LET! (de / dx) 1 Gy= 1 J/kG 1Gy=100 rad. m(kg) dose rate

Interactions of particles and radiation with matter

Detectors in Nuclear Physics (40 hours)

Emphasis on what happens to emitted particle (if no nuclear reaction and MEDIUM (i.e., atomic effects)

05/11/2013. Nuclear Fuel Cycle Ionizing radiation. Typical decay energies. Radiation with energy > 100 ev. Ionize an atom < 15eV

CHARGED PARTICLE INTERACTIONS

Chapter 2 Radiation-Matter Interactions

2. Passage of Radiation Through Matter

Interaction of Particles and Matter

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. Lecture 4

Interazioni delle particelle cariche. G. Battistoni INFN Milano

PHYS 5012 Radiation Physics and Dosimetry

EEE4101F / EEE4103F Radiation Interactions & Detection

Radiation and Radioactivity. PHYS 0219 Radiation and Radioactivity

Particle Detectors. Summer Student Lectures 2010 Werner Riegler, CERN, History of Instrumentation History of Particle Physics

Nuclear Spectroscopy: Radioactivity and Half Life

Lecture 14 (11/1/06) Charged-Particle Interactions: Stopping Power, Collisions and Ionization

Chapter II: Interactions of ions with matter

INTRODUCTION TO IONIZING RADIATION (Attix Chapter 1 p. 1-5)

Ionization Energy Loss of Charged Projectiles in Matter. Steve Ahlen Boston University

The next three lectures will address interactions of charged particles with matter. In today s lecture, we will talk about energy transfer through

Neutrino detection. Kate Scholberg, Duke University International Neutrino Summer School Sao Paulo, Brazil, August 2015

Lecture 2 & 3. Particles going through matter. Collider Detectors. PDG chapter 27 Kleinknecht chapters: PDG chapter 28 Kleinknecht chapters:

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. Lecture 3

The interaction of radiation with matter

Radiation Physics PHYS /251. Prof. Gocha Khelashvili

WHAT IS IONIZING RADIATION

Interaction with matter

Interactions of Particulate Radiation with Matter. Purpose. Importance of particulate interactions

Chapter 29. Nuclear Physics

2 Particle Interaction with Matter

Interaction of Ionizing Radiation with Matter

PHYS 571 Radiation Physics

Bethe-Block. Stopping power of positive muons in copper vs βγ = p/mc. The slight dependence on M at highest energies through T max

Interaction of Radiation with Matter

Physics of particles. H. Paganetti PhD Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School

University of Oslo. Department of Physics. Interaction Between Ionizing Radiation And Matter, Part 2 Charged-Particles.

Physics 663. Particle Physics Phenomenology. April 23, Physics 663, lecture 4 1

College Physics B - PHY2054C

Properties of the nucleus. 9.1 Nuclear Physics. Isotopes. Stable Nuclei. Size of the nucleus. Size of the nucleus

Detectors for High Energy Physics

Passage of Charged Particles in matter. Abstract:

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics

Properties of the nucleus. 8.2 Nuclear Physics. Isotopes. Stable Nuclei. Size of the nucleus. Size of the nucleus

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

Outline. Radiation Interactions. Spurs, Blobs and Short Tracks. Introduction. Radiation Interactions 1

Outline. Chapter 6 The Basic Interactions between Photons and Charged Particles with Matter. Photon interactions. Photoelectric effect

Radiation Safety Talk. UC Santa Cruz Physics 133 Winter 2018

Interaction of Electron and Photons with Matter

CHARGED PARTICLE INTERACTIONS

Particle-Matter Interactions

Radiation Safety Training Session 1: Radiation Protection Fundamentals and Biological Effects

GLOSSARY OF BASIC RADIATION PROTECTION TERMINOLOGY

CHEMISTRY Topic #1: Atomic Structure and Nuclear Chemistry Fall 2017 Dr. Susan Findlay See Exercises 2.3 to 2.6

Fall Quarter 2010 UCSB Physics 225A & UCSD Physics 214 Homework 1

Physics of Particle Beams. Hsiao-Ming Lu, Ph.D., Jay Flanz, Ph.D., Harald Paganetti, Ph.D. Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School

THE NUCLEUS OF AN ATOM

Neutron pulse height analysis (R405n)

Particle Physics Homework Assignment 4

Atomic and nuclear physics

Chapter 42. Nuclear Physics

Passage of particles through matter

Nuclear Physics. PHY232 Remco Zegers Room W109 cyclotron building.

An Analytical Approach is Developed to Estimate the Values of Range of Alpha Particles Emitted from Radon Gas

Radioactive nuclei. From Last Time. Biological effects of radiation. Radioactive decay. A random process. Radioactive tracers. e r t.

Last Lecture 1) Silicon tracking detectors 2) Reconstructing track momenta

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

Forms of Ionizing Radiation

Radiation Protection Fundamentals and Biological Effects: Session 1

Radiation Quantities and Units

2nd-Meeting. Ionization energy loss. Multiple Coulomb scattering (plural and single scattering, too) Tracking chambers

Sources of Radiation

Alpha decay usually occurs in heavy nuclei such as uranium or plutonium, and therefore is a major part of the radioactive fallout from a nuclear

Core Questions Physics unit 4 - Atomic Structure

Physics 219 Help Session. Date: Wed 12/07, Time: 6:00-8:00 pm. Location: Physics 331

Electromagnetic and hadronic showers development. G. Gaudio, M. Livan The Art of Calorimetry Lecture II

EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH GEANT4 SIMULATION OF ENERGY LOSSES OF SLOW HADRONS

Ph 3504 Radioactive Decay

Gy can be used for any type of radiation. Gy does not describe the biological effects of the different radiations.

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 24. Exam 2 Particle Detectors

The Development of Particle Physics. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev E45, Tel.:

Simulation of Energy Loss Straggling Maria Physicist January 17, 1999

Energy loss of alpha particles - Prelab questions

Chapter V: Cavity theories

Chapter NP-4. Nuclear Physics. Particle Behavior/ Gamma Interactions TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES 1.0 IONIZATION

Airo International Research Journal October, 2015 Volume VI, ISSN:

Nicholas J. Giordano. Chapter 30. Nuclear Physics. Marilyn Akins, PhD Broome Community College

PHY 142! Assignment 11! Summer 2018

Atoms, Radiation, and Radiation Protection

CHARGED PARTICLE IONIZATION AND RANGE

Interaction of charged particles and photons with matter

PS-21 First Spring Institute say : Teaching Physical Science. Radioactivity

Nuclear Fusion and Radiation

Fundamental Forces. Range Carrier Observed? Strength. Gravity Infinite Graviton No. Weak 10-6 Nuclear W+ W- Z Yes (1983)

SECTION C: NUCLEAR RADIATION AND NUCLEAR ENERGY LOSS PROCESSES. " N & = '!t and so N = N 0. implying ln! N $

Transcription:

Heavy charged particle passage through matter Peter H. Hansen University of Copenhagen

Content Bohrs argument The Bethe-Bloch formula The Landau distribution Penetration range Biological effects

Bohrs argument The momentum transferred to an atomic electron by the passage of a heavy charged particle is in the impulse approximation: P = Fdt = e E dt = e since the longitudinal components cancel. E dx v, Use Gauss law on a long cylinder with the impact parameter, b as radius and the projectile line-of-flight as axis: E 2πbdx = 4πze,

Bohrs argument cont d and hence P = 2ze2 bv E = 2z2 e 4 m e v 2 b 2. The energy lost to all electrons located between b and b + db in a thickness dx is E(b) = 4πz2 e 4 m e v 2 ρ e valid between some b min and b max. db b dx,

Bohrs argument cont d Integrating over impact parameters, we get de dx = 4πz2 e 4 m e v 2 ρ e ln b max. b min The maximal transferable energy in a head-on collision is 2γ 2 m e v 2, whereby 2z 2 e 4 m e v 2 b 2 min = 2γ 2 m e v 2 b min = ze 2 γm e v 2.

Bohrs argument cont d The condition for b max is more tricky. The argument is that the interaction time must be short compared with the orbital period of the bound electron: leading finally to b γv τ, de dx = 4πz2 e 4 m e v 2 ρ e ln γ2 m e v 3 τ ze 2.

The Bethe-Bloch Formula The correct quantum mechanical calculation leads to where de cm2 = (0.1535 MeV dx g )ρ Z A β 2 [ ( 2me c 2 γ 2 β 2 ) W max ln 2β 2 δ 2 C ]. Z W max = I 2 2m e c 2 β 2 γ 2 1 + 2 m 2m e c 2 β 2 γ 2 e M 1 + β 2 γ 2 + m2 e M 2 is the maximal transferable energy in a knock-on collision with an atomic electron. z 2

The mean excitation potential The quantity I in the logarithmic term is essentially the average orbital frequancy from Bohrs formula time Plancks constant. It can be parametrized as I Z = 12 + 7 ev f or Z < 13 Z I Z = 9.76 + 58.8Z 1.19 ev f or Z 13 It is tabulated for various substances by eg http://pdg.lbl.gov.

The small corrections The density effect, δ arises from the fact that the electric field of the projectile tends to polarise the atoms along its path. This effectively shields the electrons from the field far away from the projectile and thus reduces the relativistic rise of the logarithmic term at very high momenta. See R.M.Sternheimer, Phys.Rev. 88 (1952) 851 for a parametrization. The shell correction, C is important only at low velocities where the orbital electron can not be considered as stationary wrt the incident projectile. See W.R.Leo, Techniques for Nuclear and Particle Physics Experiments, Springer-Verlag for a parametrization.

The grand picture Stopping power [MeV cm 2 /g] 100 10 1 Lindhard- Scharff Nuclear losses µ Anderson- Ziegler Bethe-Bloch µ + on Cu Radiative effects reach 1% [GeV/c] Muon momentum Radiative Radiative losses Without δ 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10 4 10 5 10 6 βγ 0.1 1 10 100 1 10 100 1 10 100 [MeV/c] Minimum ionization E µc [TeV/c]

The Landau distribution For thin absorbers (eg gas sampling detectors), the number of ionization clusters of liberated electrons is not large enough for the Central Limit Theorem to hold. Because of the possibility of a large energy transfer in a single head-on collision, the probability distribution per sample for de/dx is very asymmetric with a long high-energy tail: This is the Landau distribution (see eg Kleinknecht), given by a complex integral (see also the GEANT manual).

de/dx sampling A way to deal with the Landau tails is to obtain many measurement samples and take a truncated mean of those. An excellent example is the de/dx in the ALEPH TPC. Here, each point is a truncated mean over at least 150 measurements on a single track with the lowest 8 and the highest 40 excluded. This results in an approximately Gaussian estimator with a width around 0.07 mip s. Note that, since the Bethe-Bloch formula depends only on beta, the de/dx of a particle with a given momentum can be used for particle identification in a wide range of momenta.

ALEPHs de/dx measurement

Penetration range The distance travelled by a charged particle before it stops is not an exact function of kinetic energy. This is because head-on collisions with electrons and nuclei are of statistical nature, causing a spread in the range called straggling. For not too high kinetic energies, the average range is approximately R = 0.004[g/cm 2 ] E 1.75 kin (E in MeV) for protons. This is more or less what we expect from the β 2 behaviour of de dx at low energies.

The Bragg peak Because of the β 2 behaviour, a proton or ion reaches its maximum ionization power just before it stops. This is called the Bragg peak. This make protons or light ions much better for cancer-therapy than the X-rays and electron guns we have in Denmark, since protons can deliver most of their energy at the Bragg peak to the sick tissue without destroying the healthy tissue in front. (anti-protons would be even better).

Equivalent dose The biological damage effects in average human tissue, however, vary with the kind of radiation. For example, 1 MeV neutrons causes 20 times more damage than electrons at the same dose. The equivalent dose is weighted by such factors. The unit is Sievert with the same dimension as Gray (J/kg). The biological damages are furthermore different (by up to a factor 20) in different organs of the body (the least in the skin and bone surfaces). The chemical or enzymatic restoration of damaged cells can not keep up with a sudden high dose. A sudden dose greater than 2-3 Sv is life-threatening.

Typical doses Ordinary people get most radiation from inhalation of Radon from the underground (typically 1.5 msv/yr). Stewardesses get more from cosmic radiation. Physicists working at nuclear labs in general get negligible doses. However, a dosimeter monitoring how much you get is advisable, if you work with radiation on a daily basis. Most radioactive sources do not produce radiation with energy high enough to penetrate the skin. Therefore it is most important to avoid inhaling or eating radioactive substances, which brings the radiation directly to the cells. This may also be why you should not smoke.

Shielding A high Z material (e.g. Pb) is best for shielding against γ-rays and positrons. For electrons low-z polystyrene or lucite work best in order to avoid bremsstrahlung (or a sandwich of low-z/high-z shield). For neutrons use paraffin, water or other hydrogeneous material. For high energy charged hadrons use the cheapest material (because you need a lot) with the highest density (i.e. Fe).