AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO THE CONCEPT OF SEPARABILITY IN GALOIS THEORY arxiv: v1 [math.ac] 27 Sep 2017

Similar documents
Fields and Galois Theory. Below are some results dealing with fields, up to and including the fundamental theorem of Galois theory.

55 Separable Extensions

Finite Fields. [Parts from Chapter 16. Also applications of FTGT]

MATH 101A: ALGEBRA I, PART D: GALOIS THEORY 11

Part II Galois Theory

Part II Galois Theory

GALOIS THEORY BRIAN OSSERMAN

9. Finite fields. 1. Uniqueness

Extension fields II. Sergei Silvestrov. Spring term 2011, Lecture 13

Galois theory (Part II)( ) Example Sheet 1

but no smaller power is equal to one. polynomial is defined to be

MINIMAL GENERATING SETS OF GROUPS, RINGS, AND FIELDS

4 Etale algebras, norm and trace

Fields. Victoria Noquez. March 19, 2009

Math 121 Homework 2 Solutions

RUDIMENTARY GALOIS THEORY

Math 201C Homework. Edward Burkard. g 1 (u) v + f 2(u) g 2 (u) v2 + + f n(u) a 2,k u k v a 1,k u k v + k=0. k=0 d

Contradiction. Theorem 1.9. (Artin) Let G be a finite group of automorphisms of E and F = E G the fixed field of G. Then [E : F ] G.

Notes on Field Extensions

1 Rings 1 RINGS 1. Theorem 1.1 (Substitution Principle). Let ϕ : R R be a ring homomorphism

MAIN THEOREM OF GALOIS THEORY

7 Orders in Dedekind domains, primes in Galois extensions

The Kummer Pairing. Alexander J. Barrios Purdue University. 12 September 2013

Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 3 Feb 2019

Graduate Preliminary Examination

Theorem 5.3. Let E/F, E = F (u), be a simple field extension. Then u is algebraic if and only if E/F is finite. In this case, [E : F ] = deg f u.

Homework 4 Algebra. Joshua Ruiter. February 21, 2018

Field Theory Qual Review

Notes on graduate algebra. Robert Harron

Extension theorems for homomorphisms

GALOIS THEORY. Contents

Section V.7. Cyclic Extensions

Section 33 Finite fields

ALGEBRA HW 9 CLAY SHONKWILER

Page Points Possible Points. Total 200

GALOIS THEORY AT WORK: CONCRETE EXAMPLES

Galois Theory, summary

Section V.6. Separability

EXTENSIONS OF ABSOLUTE VALUES

Section V.3. Splitting Fields, Algebraic Closure, and Normality (Supplement)

Course 311: Abstract Algebra Academic year

Galois Theory of Cyclotomic Extensions

SEPARABILITY II KEITH CONRAD

Fields and Galois Theory Fall 2004 Professor Yu-Ru Liu

MAT 535 Problem Set 5 Solutions

1 Separability and splitting fields

FIELD THEORY. Contents

x by so in other words ( )

4.5 Hilbert s Nullstellensatz (Zeros Theorem)

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO LOCAL FIELDS

Algebraic Cryptography Exam 2 Review

22. Galois theory. G = Gal(L/k) = Aut(L/k) [L : K] = H. Gal(K/k) G/H

D-MATH Algebra I HS17 Prof. Emmanuel Kowalski. Solution 12. Algebraic closure, splitting field

Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille

Galois theory of fields

Selected exercises from Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote (3rd edition).

A Harvard Sampler. Evan Chen. February 23, I crashed a few math classes at Harvard on February 21, Here are notes from the classes.

AN INTRODUCTION TO GALOIS THEORY

CONSTRUCTIBLE NUMBERS AND GALOIS THEORY

p-adic fields Chapter 7

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #17 11/05/2013

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 10 Nov 2018

ALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL

Galois Theory and the Insolvability of the Quintic Equation

4.4 Noetherian Rings

GALOIS EXTENSIONS ZIJIAN YAO

School of Mathematics and Statistics. MT5836 Galois Theory. Handout 0: Course Information

Existence of a Picard-Vessiot extension

22M: 121 Final Exam. Answer any three in this section. Each question is worth 10 points.

NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS

Galois Theory TCU Graduate Student Seminar George Gilbert October 2015

3 Galois Theory. 3.1 Definitions and Examples

0.2 Vector spaces. J.A.Beachy 1

1 Fields and vector spaces

Galois Theory. This material is review from Linear Algebra but we include it for completeness.

Part II Galois Theory

Course 311: Hilary Term 2006 Part IV: Introduction to Galois Theory

Section VI.33. Finite Fields

54.1 Definition: Let E/K and F/K be field extensions. A mapping : E

x by so in other words ( )

Math 762 Spring h Y (Z 1 ) (1) h X (Z 2 ) h X (Z 1 ) Φ Z 1. h Y (Z 2 )

10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann

Math 121 Homework 6 Solutions

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #7 09/26/2013

Review of Linear Algebra

50 Algebraic Extensions

2. Prime and Maximal Ideals

Identify F inside K and K. Then, by the claim, we have an embedding σ : K K such that σ F = id F. Since σ(k)/f and K/F are isomorphic extensions, the

Real Analysis Prelim Questions Day 1 August 27, 2013

THE TATE MODULE. Seminar: Elliptic curves and the Weil conjecture. Yassin Mousa. Z p

Polynomial Rings and Galois Theory

Algebra SEP Solutions

GALOIS THEORY AT WORK

A Field Extension as a Vector Space

Algebra Ph.D. Preliminary Exam

Pacific Journal of Mathematics

CHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL. Paul Vojta. University of California, Berkeley. 18 February 1998

ON GALOIS GROUPS OF ABELIAN EXTENSIONS OVER MAXIMAL CYCLOTOMIC FIELDS. Mamoru Asada. Introduction

Notes on Galois Theory

Transcription:

AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO THE CONCEPT OF SEPARABILITY IN GALOIS THEORY arxiv:1709.09640v1 [math.ac] 27 Sep 2017 M. G. MAHMOUDI Abstract. The notion of a separable extension is an important concept in Galois theory. Traditionally, this concept is introduced using the minimal polynomial and the formal derivative. In this work, we present an alternative approach to this classical concept. Based on our approach, we will give new proofs of some basic results about separable extensions (such as the existence of the separable closure, Theorem of the primitive element and the transitivity of separability). Key words: separable extension, Galois theory. Mathematics Subject Classification: 12F10, 12F05, 12F15. Introduction In most elementary textbooks on Galois theory, separable extensions are usually introduced via the minimal polynomial: an algebraic extension E/K is separable if the minimal polynomial f(x) K[X] of every element α E has nonzero formal derivative, or equivalently f(x) has distinct roots in its splitting field or any algebraically closed field Ω containing E. For normal extensions, there is a more functorial definition: a field extension E/K is normal if there is a unique K-algebra embedding of E into Ω (see [1, Ch. 6]). It would be interesting to know if there exists an analogous definition for separable extensions. The aim of this work is to address this question. There exist already some methods to introduce separable extensions using the embeddings of E/K into an algebraic closure Ω of E (note that every algebraic closure of K is isomorphic to an algebraic closure of E). Let Hom K (E,Ω) denote the set of all K-algebra homomorphisms from E into Ω. On can show that an extension E/K of finite degree is separable if and only if Hom K (E,Ω) = [E : K] (see [1, Ch. 7]). There is another criterion (see [2, Ch. V., 15, n. 6]) as follows: E/K is separable if and only if for every linearly independent elements 1

2 M. G. MAHMOUDI a 1,,a n E over K, there exist K-automorphisms σ 1,,σ n of Ω such that det(σ i (a j )) 0. These properties are very useful characterization of separable extensions, but applying them are generally less easy. We suggest using the following alternative definition of separability: Definition. We say that an element α of algebraic field extension E/K is separable if for every intermediate subfield L of E/K with α E\L, there exist two L-algebra homomorphisms φ, ψ : E Ω such that φ(α) ψ(α). An algebraic extension E/K is called separable if all its elements are separable. Other equivalent conditions will be given in Corollary 1.3 and Corollary 1.5. Roughly speaking, this definition says that L and α can be separated by the homomorphisms from E into Ω. First, we show that the above definition is equivalent to the usual concept of separability. Then, we give new proofs of some basic results about separable extensions (such as the existence of the separable closure, Theorem of the primitive element and the transitivity of separability) based on this approach. We hope that our approach provides a useful insight into the concept of separability. 1. Alternative definition of separability We recall the following standard facts about the embeddings of a algebraic extension into an algebraically closed field (for the proof see [1, p. 53 and p. 67]). Theorem 1.1. (a) (Tower formula for the number of embeddings) Let E/K be a field extension of finite degree with an intermediate subfield L. Let Ω be an algebraic closure of E. Then Hom K (E,Ω) = Hom L (E,Ω) Hom K (L,Ω), in particular Hom K (E,Ω) [E : K]. (b) (Extending field embeddings) Let L/F be an algebraic extension of fields. Then every field embedding from F into an algebraically closed field Ω can be extended to a one from L to Ω. Proposition 1.2. Let E/K be an extension of fields and α E. Let Ω be the algebraic closure of E. The following statements are equivalent: (i) The minimal polynomial of α over K has distinct roots in Ω. (ii) For every intermediate subfield L of E/K with α E\L, there exist L-algebra homomorphisms φ,ψ : E Ω such that φ(α) ψ(α). (iii) For every intermediate subfield L of K(α)/K with α K(α)\L,

AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO THE CONCEPT OF SEPARABILITY 3 there exist two L-algebra homomorphisms φ,ψ : E Ω such that φ(α) ψ(α). Proof. (i) (ii) The minimal polynomial of α over L has distinct roots in Ω, so L(α) has distinct L-embeddings into Ω. (ii) (iii) is immediate. (iii) (i) Let f(x) K[X] be the minimal polynomial of α. If the minimal polynomial of α over K does not have distinct roots in Ω, then K is of characteristic p > 0 and there exists n 1 such that f(x) = g(x pn ) where g(x) K[X] has nonzero formal derivative. Take L = K(α pn ). Note that α K(α)\L, otherwise α would satisfy in a polynomial of degree less than degf(x). Since α pn L, we have φ(α) = ψ(α) for every L-algebra homomorphism φ,ψ : E Ω, contradiction. The above equivalence, in particular shows that the definition of separability given in (ii), which at first seems relative, does not depend on E. Thus, if E and E are two algebraic field extension of K containing α, then α is separable as an element of E then it is separable as an element of E. Also, if K L E and α E is separable over K, then it is separable over L. Corollary 1.3. Let E/K be a separable extension with intermediate subfields L 1 and L 2. The following conditions are equivalents: (i) L 1 L 2. (ii) For every φ,ψ Hom K (E,Ω), φ L2 = ψ L2 implies φ L1 = ψ L1. Conversely if (i) and (ii) are equivalents for every L 1 and L 2 then E/K is separable. Proof. (ii) (i): If L 1 L 2, consider an element α L 1 \L 2, then there exists φ,ψ Hom L2 (E,Ω) with φ(α) ψ(α). This contradicts (ii). The implication (i) (ii) is evident. Conversely suppose that L is an intermediate subfield and α E\L. If there exist no φ,ψ Hom L (E,Ω) with φ(α) ψ(α), then by taking L 1 = K(α) and L 2 = L, the equivalence of (i) and (ii) implies that K(α) L, contradiction. Corollary 1.4. Let E/K be a separable extension and let α,β E. The following conditions are equivalent: (i) α K(β). (ii) For every φ,ψ Hom K (E,Ω), φ(β) = ψ(β) implies φ(α) = ψ(α). As a consequence we obtain Corollary 1.5. An algebraic field extension E/K is separable if and onlyif for everyproperintermediatesubfieldlofe/k, Hom L (E,Ω) > 1.

4 M. G. MAHMOUDI Proof. Consider an element α E\L. As E/K is separable, there exists φ,ψ Hom L (E,Ω) such that φ(α) ψ(α), hence Hom L (E,Ω) > 1. Conversely, suppose that Hom L (E,Ω) > 1 for every intermediate subfield L. Consider an element α E\L. We show that there exist φ,ψ Hom L (E,Ω) such that φ(α) ψ(α). If it is not the case, by taking L 2 = L and L 1 = K(α), Corollary 1.3 implies that K(α) L, contradiction. 2. Some applications Theorem 2.1 (Primitive Element Theorem). Let E/K be a separable field extension of finite degree. Then there exists an element α E such that E = K(α). Proof. For finite fields, we follow the standard argument. If K is a field with q elements and E = q n, then we have L q n 1 for every proper intermediate subfield L of E/K, hence every element x E satisfies x qn 1 x = 0. Since E > q n 1, there exists certainly an element α E with α qn 1 α 0, this element is not included in any proper subfield, hence K(α) = E. Now consider the case where K is infinite. Let α,β E. It suffices to prove that there exists γ E such that α,β K(γ). We may assume that α and β are linearly independent over K. Let P be the plane spanned by α and β. If our claim is not true then for every nonzero γ P, K(γ) P is one dimensional over K. Since K is infinite, there exists an infinite number of pairwise noncolinear elements γ 1,γ 2, P. It follows that γ i K(γ j ) if i j. By Corollary 1.3, there exist φ ij,ψ ij Hom K (E,Ω) such that φ ij K(γi ) = ψ ij K(γi ) but φ ij K(γj ) ψ ij K(γj ). As Hom K (E,Ω) is finite, there exist distinct i,j,k such that φ ji = φ ki and ψ ji = ψ ki. We obtain φ ki (γ j ) = φ ji (γ j ) = ψ ji (γ j ) = ψ ki (γ j ), on the other hand φ ki (γ k ) = ψ ki (γ k ), so φ ki P = ψ ki P, contradiction. Corollary 2.2. If E/K is a separable extension of finite degree then Hom K (E,Ω) = [E : K]. Conversely if Hom K (E,Ω) = [E : K] then E/K is separable. In particular if α E is separable over K then the extension K(α)/K is separable. Proof. Suppose that [E : K] = n. By Theorem 2.1, there exists α E with E = K(α). As α is separable over F, the minimal polynomial f(x) K[x] of α has n distinct roots α 1,,α n Ω. For every i = 1,,n we can define a map φ i Hom(E,Ω) by φ i (α) = α i.

AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO THE CONCEPT OF SEPARABILITY 5 Conversely for every φ Hom K (E,Ω), φ(α) is necessarily equal to one of the elements α 1,,α n. Conversely, suppose that Hom K (E,Ω) = [E : K]. We have to show that E/K is separable. Otherwise, by Corollary 1.5, there exists a proper intermediate subfield L such that Hom L (E,Ω) = 1. Thus we have Hom K (E,Ω) = Hom K (L,Ω) Hom L (E,Ω) = Hom K (L,Ω) [L : K] < n, contradiction. Proposition 2.3. Let E/K be an algebraic extension. Then the set of separable elements of E/K form an intermediate subfield. Proof. It suffices to prove that for every separable elements α,β E, α + β and αβ is separable. We may assume that αβ 0. For an intermediate subfield L with α + β L, we should prove that there exists two maps in Hom L (E,Ω) whose values on α + β are different. If α L, then by separability of β there exists φ,ψ Hom L (E,Ω) with φ(β) ψ(β), hence φ(α+β) ψ(α+β). We may then assume that α, β L. If α L(β), then by separability of α, there exist φ,ψ Hom L(β) (E,Ω) Hom L (E,Ω) with φ(α) ψ(α) and we obtain φ(α+β) ψ(α+β). So assume that α L(β). As β is separable over K, it is also separable over L, hence by Corollary 2.2 every element of L(β) is separable over L, in particular α+β is separable over L. Hence Hom L (L(α+β),Ω) > 1andthereexist φ,ψ Hom L (L(α+β),Ω)with φ(α+β) ψ(α+β), φ and ψ can be extended to φ, ψ Hom L (E,Ω) and we are done. The proof for αβ is similar. Corollary 2.4. Let E/L and L/K be algebraic separable extensions. Then E/K is separable as well. Proof. Let M be an intermediate subfield of E/K and α E\M. We should prove the existence of two homomorphisms φ,ψ Hom M (E,Ω) with φ(α) ψ(α). If α LM, then by the separability of E/L, there exist φ,ψ Hom LM (E,Ω) Hom M (E,Ω) with φ(α) ψ(α) and we are done. Consider the case where, α LM. As all elements of L are separable over K, then by Proposition 2.3, LM/M is separable. There exist so two homomorphisms φ,ψ Hom M (LM,Ω) with φ(α) ψ(α). These homomorphisms can be extended to homomorphisms in Hom M (E,Ω). References [1] Lorenz, F., Algebra. Vol. 1. Fields and Galois theory, Translated from the 1987 German edition by Silvio Levy. With the collaboration of Levy. Universitext. Springer, New York, 2006.

6 M. G. MAHMOUDI [2] Bourbaki, N., Élémentsdemathématique,Algèbre,Chapitres4-7,Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, Reprint of the 1981 original, 2007. M. G. Mahmoudi, mmahmoudi@sharif.ir, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Sharif University of Technology, P. O. Box 11155-9415, Tehran, Iran.