arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 17 Dec 2003

Similar documents
Gamma-ray Bursts. Chapter 4

Lecture 20 High-Energy Astronomy. HEA intro X-ray astrophysics a very brief run through. Swift & GRBs 6.4 kev Fe line and the Kerr metric

Gamma-Ray Bursts and their Afterglows

Astronomy 102: Stars and Galaxies Examination 3 April 11, 2003

Chapter 0 Introduction X-RAY BINARIES

ASTRONOMY 1 FINAL EXAM 1 Name

The Birth Of Stars. How do stars form from the interstellar medium Where does star formation take place How do we induce star formation

Late stages of stellar evolution for high-mass stars

Number of Stars: 100 billion (10 11 ) Mass : 5 x Solar masses. Size of Disk: 100,000 Light Years (30 kpc)

PoS(SSC2015)051. Multi-tomography of polars from SALT spectroscopy

X-ray Astronomy F R O M V - R O CKETS TO AT HENA MISSION. Thanassis Akylas

Gas 1: Molecular clouds

Supernova Remnants and Cosmic. Rays

X Rays must be viewed from space used for detecting exotic objects such as neutron stars and black holes also observing the Sun.

Dark Matter ASTR 2120 Sarazin. Bullet Cluster of Galaxies - Dark Matter Lab

ASTR-1010: Astronomy I Course Notes Section IV

Radio Aspects of the Transient Universe

Age-redshift relation. The time since the big bang depends on the cosmological parameters.

Distribution of Gamma-ray Burst Ejecta Energy with Lorentz Factor

Astronomy. Chapter 15 Stellar Remnants: White Dwarfs, Neutron Stars, and Black Holes

Lobster X-ray Telescope Science. Julian Osborne

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 17 Dec 2001

Astronomy 104: Second Exam

Measuring the Properties of Stars (ch. 17) [Material in smaller font on this page will not be present on the exam]

The Interstellar Medium. Papillon Nebula. Neutral Hydrogen Clouds. Interstellar Gas. The remaining 1% exists as interstellar grains or

Answer Key for Exam C

Answer Key for Exam B

Exam #2 Review Sheet. Part #1 Clicker Questions

Brock University. Test 1, February, 2017 Number of pages: 9 Course: ASTR 1P02 Number of Students: 480 Date of Examination: February 6, 2017

Universe Now. 12. Revision and highlights

AST 101 INTRODUCTION TO ASTRONOMY SPRING MIDTERM EXAM 2 TEST VERSION 1 ANSWERS

A Decade of Short-duration Gamma-ray Burst Afterglows

AST 301, Lecture 2. James Lattimer. Department of Physics & Astronomy 449 ESS Bldg. Stony Brook University. January 29, 2019

Brock University. Test 1, January, 2015 Number of pages: 9 Course: ASTR 1P02 Number of Students: 500 Date of Examination: January 29, 2015

ASTR 101 Introduction to Astronomy: Stars & Galaxies

AGN Physics of the Ionized Gas Physical conditions in the NLR Physical conditions in the BLR LINERs Emission-Line Diagnostics High-Energy Effects

The physics of stars. A star begins simply as a roughly spherical ball of (mostly) hydrogen gas, responding only to gravity and it s own pressure.

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 1 Mar 1999

RX J and RX J : recent results and status

Compton Lecture #4: Massive Stars and. Supernovae. Welcome! On the back table:

Astrophysical Quantities

Thermal pressure vs. magnetic pressure

Review: Properties of a wave

A100 Exploring the Universe: The Milky Way as a Galaxy. Martin D. Weinberg UMass Astronomy

Searching for Other Worlds

Gamma-Ray Astronomy. Astro 129: Chapter 1a

ASTR 101 Introduction to Astronomy: Stars & Galaxies

Direct imaging of extra-solar planets

ON GRB PHYSICS REVEALED BY FERMI/LAT

Observations of extrasolar planets

Stars, Galaxies & the Universe Lecture Outline

The Black Hole in the Galactic Center. Eliot Quataert (UC Berkeley)

* * The Astronomical Context. Much of astronomy is about positions so we need coordinate systems to. describe them. 2.1 Angles and Positions

Tidal disruption events from the first XMM-Newton Slew Survey

Spitzer Space Telescope Current Status and Future Plans

Introductory Astrophysics A113. Death of Stars. Relation between the mass of a star and its death White dwarfs and supernovae Enrichment of the ISM

The Light of Your Life. We can see the universe because atoms emit photons

In class quiz - nature of light. Moonbow with Sailboats (Matt BenDaniel)

Components of Galaxies Gas The Importance of Gas

Fermi: Highlights of GeV Gamma-ray Astronomy

Multi-wavelength Astronomy

Bright Quasar 3C 273 Thierry J-L Courvoisier. Encyclopedia of Astronomy & Astrophysics P. Murdin

The formation & evolution of solar systems

HR Diagram, Star Clusters, and Stellar Evolution

Today in Astronomy 102: observations of stellarmass black holes

Our sole source of light and heat in the solar system. A very common star: a glowing g ball of gas held together by its own gravity and powered

Stellar Astronomy Sample Questions for Exam 3

INTEGRAL & Magnetars: a high energy approach to extreme neutron stars

The Ecology of Stars

Lecture 8: Stellar evolution II: Massive stars

Astronomy 1504/15014 Section 20

Observing GRB afterglows with SIMBOL-X

18. Stellar Birth. Initiation of Star Formation. The Orion Nebula: A Close-Up View. Interstellar Gas & Dust in Our Galaxy

Physics HW Set 3 Spring 2015

ASTRONOMY CURRICULUM Unit 1: Introduction to Astronomy

New physics is learnt from extreme or fundamental things

Physics Homework Set 2 Sp 2015

II Planet Finding.

Objectives. HR Diagram

Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE

29:50 Stars, Galaxies, and the Universe Final Exam December 13, 2010 Form A

Astronomy Exam 3 - Sun and Stars

Coriolis Effect - the apparent curved paths of projectiles, winds, and ocean currents

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 22 Aug 2014

Colliding winds in massive star binaries: expectations from radio to gamma rays

ACCRETION JET CONNECTION τ α MBH

Simon P. Balm Astro 5 Test #3 Sample Questions

The Discovery of Gamma-Ray Bursts

Analyzing X-Ray Pulses from Stellar Cores Pencil & Paper Version

Instability and different burning regimes

Black Holes in Hibernation

Neutron Stars. Properties of Neutron Stars. Formation of Neutron Stars. Chapter 14. Neutron Stars and Black Holes. Topics for Today s Class

Stars with Mⵙ go through two Red Giant Stages

Rotating RAdio Transients (RRATs) ApJ, 2006, 646, L139 Nature, 2006, 439, 817 Astro-ph/

A Library of the X-ray Universe: Generating the XMM-Newton Source Catalogues

ASTR 2310: Chapter 6

Recall what you know about the Big Bang.

L = 4 d 2 B p. 4. Which of the letters at right corresponds roughly to where one would find a red giant star on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram?

L = 4 d 2 B p. 1. Which outer layer of the Sun has the highest temperature? A) Photosphere B) Corona C) Chromosphere D) Exosphere E) Thermosphere

Extreme optical outbursts from a magnetar-like transient source: SWIFT J

Transcription:

Electromagnetic Signals from Planetary Collisions Bing Zhang and Steinn Sigurdsson arxiv:astro-ph/0312439 v1 17 Dec 2003 Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802 Abstract. We investigate the electromagnetic signals accompanied with planetary collisions and their event rate, and explore the possibility of directly detecting such events. A typical Earth Jupiter collision would give rise to a prompt EUV-soft-X-ray flash lasting for hours and a bright IR afterglow lasting for thousands of years. With the current and forthcoming observational technology and facilities, some of these collisional flashes or the post-collision remnants could be discovered. INTRODUCTION More than 100 extra-solar planets have been detected. At the same time, our understanding of astrophysical phenomena has been greatly boosted through studying cataclysmic transient events such as supernovae, X-ray bursts, and gamma-ray bursts. Another type of electromagnetic transient events that arises from collisions of extra-solar planets has been long predicted in the context of planet formation[1]. Recently we discussed the possible electromagnetic signals accompanying such collisional events[2]. Discovering such events would undoubtedly have profound implications of understanding the formation rate, dynamical instability, as well as internal composition and structure of extrasolar planets. ELECTROMAGNETIC SIGNALS: THREE STAGES Generally one can categorize the collision-induced signals into three stages, defined by three characteristic time scales. Below we will take a head-on collision between a Jovian planet and an Earth-size planet as an example. A schematic lightcurve is presented in Figure 1. Stage 1: Prompt EUV-Soft-X-ray Flash Assuming zero velocity at infinity, the total energy of the collision is about 6 10 40 erg. Upon impact, a reverse shock propagates into the impactor (i.e. the Earthsize planet), and the shock crossing time scale is 10 minutes. This defines the rising timescale of the collision-induced electromagnetic flash. The energy deposition rate during this stage is 10 38 erg s 1, much greater than Jupiter s Eddington luminosity.

FIGURE 1. A schematic bolometric lightcurve for a Jupiter-Earth collision event. Three stages are highlighted: (1) a prompt EUV-soft-X-ray flash, characterized by a sharp rise and milder decay lasting for hours; (2) a spin-modulated decaying lightcurve lasting for about a month, which could be visible in the EUV, X-ray, optical and radio bands; (3) a long-term IR warm afterglow lasting for thousands of years. A likely picture is that the prompt heat generated upon collision would dissociate the molecules and ionize the atoms within a short period of time, and the emission quickly becomes Eddington-limited. After the peak, the lightcurve decays mildly as the deceleration of the impactor is still going on inside the Jovian planet. The timescale of the prompt flash can be estimated to be of order of 10 times of the rising time, i.e., τ 1 2 hr. (1) The bolometric luminosity is near Eddington, i.e. L pk 5 10 34 erg s 1, with a thermal temperature T pk 1.1 10 5 K emitting from a hot spot with a radius comparable of the Earth radius. The peak flux is F ν (pk) 60 µjy (D/10kpc) 2. peaking in the EUV band. A non-thermal tail due to Comptonization would extend into the soft-xray band, detectable through out the Galaxy if the neutral hydrogen absorption is not important, and is even visible from some nearby galaxies. The prompt flash greatly increases the planet-to-star flux ratio, making them detectable in the optical band through photometry monitoring [ f(u,pk) 0.2, f(v,pk) 0.02, and f(i,pk) 0.008, where f(ν) F(ν, planet)/f(ν, star)]. The total energy radiated during this prompt phase is a tiny fraction ( 0.5%) of the total energy deposited. The majority of energy is stored as latent heat and radiated over a much longer time scale.

Stage 2: Spin-Modulated Decaying Phase After the prompt phase ends (i.e. the impactor is stopped inside the giant planet), the luminosity steadily drops. The heat deposited deep inside the giant planet would excite a vigorous convective flow. The area of the hot spot gradually gets larger and larger until the whole surface reaches the same temperature. The time scale for retaining a hot spot could be estimated as τ 2 1 month. (2) During this time, an observer would see some quasi-periodic signal due to the modulation of the planet spin (with a period < 1 day), as the hot spot enters and leaves the field of view. The modulation pattern could be visible in EUV-X-ray, or in optical through photometric monitoring, or in radio. A radio flare is expected during the vigorous convective epoch due to the enhanced dynamo activity inside the giant planet. The periodic pattern would be gradually smeared out as the hot spot boundary gradually increases. Stage 3: Long-Term IR Afterglow After the surface temperature becomes uniform, the giant planet keeps cooling, radiating away the majority of the energy deposited during the impact. This time scale is much longer, typically τ 3 10 3 10 4 yr. (3) The channel of emission is mainly in IR[3]. During this epoch, the planet-to-star flux ratio in the IR band is very high. For a G2 host star, the typical I- and K-band flux contrasts are f(i,ag) 2.6 10 4 and f(k,ag) 1.7 10 3. This is favorable to be detected in nearby star forming regions[3]. DETECTABILITY Numerical simulations[4, 5] suggest that collisions of the type we are discussing are plausible. The basic picture is that there are secular perturbations of the inner planets, which over time scales comparable to the age of the system lead to large changes in eccentricity and semi-major axis for one or more planets, leading to a large probability of collision. The event rate can be roughly estimated. Assuming that on average a solar-system like our own has 5 collisions over its life time, and that essentially every star harbors a planetary system, the collision event rate in our galaxy would be about 5 10 11 /(10 10 yr) 50/yr. Considering an ensemble of stars with an average age t, in order to detect one event with duration τ after a continuous observation time of t obs, the critical number of stars in this ensemble that have to be searched is N = ( f p N c ) 1 t max(τ,t obs ), (4)

where f p 100% is the fraction of the stars in the ensemble that have planets, and N c 5 is the average total number of collisions during the lifetime of a typical star in the ensemble. One can also define a characteristic flux F ν,c of the collisional events. Given a number density n of the stars with the average age t, one can estimate a critical distance one has to search in order to find one collisional event, i.e., D c (N /n ) 1/3. The typical flux can be then estimated with D c. Although N is sensitive to the average age t of the ensemble of stars being investigated, D c and F ν,c are essentially independent of the ensemble adopted, given a constant birth rate of stars. According to such an estimate, the Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer (EUVE) all-sky survey[6] may have recorded 10 such events, with the brightest one having a count rate of about (170 680) counts ks 1 at 100 angstrom. The predicted flux level is also well above the sensitivity of soft X- ray detectors, such as ROSAT, Chandra, and XMM-Newton, so that there might be such events recorded in their archival data as well. SEARCHING STRATEGY A future dedicated wide field detector sensitive to (50-200) angstrom would be able to detect 10 s of EUV-soft-X-ray flares per year due to planetary collisions. Photometrically monitoring a huge number of stars over a long period of time by missions such as GAIA[7] (or other synoptic all-sky surveys) for several years should lead to detections of several collisional events. If an EUV-soft-X-ray flare is detected, a search of its optical and radio counterpart (like catching afterglows in gamma-ray burst study) is desirable. A planetary-rotation-period modulated fading signal would be an important clue. Doppler radial velocity measurements and IR monitoring may be performed later for the collision candidate to verify the existence of the planet(s). Each collisional event would leave a bright remnant glowing in IR. The duration of the afterglow is thousands of years. Such afterglows could be directly searched in the nearby star forming regions, and the planets could be directly imaged. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work is supported by NASA NAG5-13286, the NSF grant PHY-0203046, the Center for Gravitational Wave Physics (under NSF PHY 01-14375), and the Penn State Astrobiology Research Center. REFERENCES 1. Wetherill, G. W. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 18, 205 (1990) 2. Zhang, B. & Sigurdsson, S. S. ApJ, 596, L95 (2003) 3. Stern, S. A. AJ, 108, 2312 (1994) 4. Chambers, J. E., Wetherill, G. W., & Boss, A. P. Icarus, 119, 261 (1996) 5. Ford, E. B., Havlickova, M. & Rasio, F. A. Icarus, 150, 303 (2001) 6. McDonald, K. et al. AJ, 108, 1843 (1994)

7. Perryman, M. A. C., et al., A&A, 369, 339 (2001)