Numerical Approach for Torsion Properties of Built-Up Runway Girders

Similar documents
Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS

APPENDIX A Thickness of Base Metal

Singly Symmetric Combination Section Crane Girder Design Aids. Patrick C. Johnson

TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES)

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members

UNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability:

CHAPTER 5 PROPOSED WARPING CONSTANT

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

Torsional Analysis of

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

Chapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads

CivilBay Crane Load and Crane Runway Beam Design v1.0.0 User Manual

Workshop 8. Lateral Buckling

UNIVERSITY OF AKRON Department of Civil Engineering

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

CLASSICAL TORSION AND AIST TORSION THEORY

Using the finite element method of structural analysis, determine displacements at nodes 1 and 2.

AREAS, RADIUS OF GYRATION

SUMMARY FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS. Determine the factored design loads (AISC/LRFD Specification A4).

Improved Flexural Design Provisions for I-Shaped Members and Channels

Steel Cross Sections. Structural Steel Design

CHAPTER -6- BENDING Part -1-

[8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams

twenty steel construction: columns & tension members ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2013 lecture

Review of Strain Energy Methods and Introduction to Stiffness Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis

DESIGN OF BUCKLING RESISTANCE OF COMPRESSED HSS - CHANNELS

3-D second-order plastic-hinge analysis accounting for local buckling

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

A Parametric Study on Lateral Torsional Buckling of European IPN and IPE Cantilevers H. Ozbasaran

Mechanics of Solids notes

CHAPTER 4. Stresses in Beams

FLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES

Chapter 5 Torsion STRUCTURAL MECHANICS: CE203. Notes are based on Mechanics of Materials: by R. C. Hibbeler, 7th Edition, Pearson

Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams

Unit 15 Shearing and Torsion (and Bending) of Shell Beams

Chapter Objectives. Copyright 2011 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd

A HIGHER-ORDER BEAM THEORY FOR COMPOSITE BOX BEAMS

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans-National Approach

Steel Post Load Analysis

(Round up to the nearest inch.)

Local Buckling. Local Buckling in Columns. Buckling is not to be viewed only as failure of the entire member

APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES

Module 11 Design of Joints for Special Loading. Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

A numerical parametric study on the plate inclination angle of steel plate shear walls

LATERAL STABILITY OF PLATE GIRDERS WITH CORRUGATED STEEL WEBS

Lateral Buckling of Singly Symmetric Beams

Chapter 6: Cross-Sectional Properties of Structural Members

Composite Beams DYB 654: ADVANCED STEEL STRUCTURES - II. Department of Earthquake and

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

An Increase in Elastic Buckling Strength of Plate Girder by the Influence of Transverse Stiffeners

CHAPTER II EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Engineering Tripos Part IIA Supervisor Version. Module 3D4 Structural Analysis and Stability Handout 1

Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Tsing Yi) Higher Diploma in Civil Engineering Structural Mechanics. Chapter 2 SECTION PROPERTIES

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Local buckling is an extremely important facet of cold formed steel

7 Vlasov torsion theory

CHAPTER 6: Shearing Stresses in Beams

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

M5 Simple Beam Theory (continued)

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

ERRATA for PE Civil Structural Practice Exam ISBN Copyright 2014 (July 2016 Second Printing) Errata posted

Chapter Objectives. Copyright 2011 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd

Chapter 3. Load and Stress Analysis

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering

14. *14.8 CASTIGLIANO S THEOREM

Statics: Lecture Notes for Sections

Direct Strength Method of Design for Shear of Cold-formed Channels Based on a Shear Signature Curve

Biaxial Analysis of General Shaped Base Plates

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Discontinuous Distributions in Mechanics of Materials

Lateral-torsional buckling of orthotropic rectangular section beams

Stress Analysis Lecture 4 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy

Elastic buckling of web plates in I-girders under patch and wheel loading

10.5 MOMENT OF INERTIA FOR A COMPOSITE AREA

ENG202 Statics Lecture 16, Section 7.1

Downloaded from Downloaded from / 1

Theory of structure I 2006/2013. Chapter one DETERMINACY & INDETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES

Simple Method for Analysis of Tube Frame by Consideration of Negative Shear Lag

CO~RSEOUTL..INE. revisedjune 1981 by G. Frech. of..a.pqij~t(..~ttsa.fidteconol.q.gy. Sault ",Ste'...:M~ri,e.: SAUl. ir.ft\,nl~t';~l' G ". E b:.

FINITE GRID SOLUTION FOR NON-RECTANGULAR PLATES

The Local Web Buckling Strength of Coped Steel I-Beam. ABSTRACT : When a beam flange is coped to allow clearance at the

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown?

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Example 4: Design of a Rigid Column Bracket (Bolted)

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and turned in Part 1.

Jeff Brown Hope College, Department of Engineering, 27 Graves Pl., Holland, Michigan, USA UNESCO EOLSS

SIMPLE MODEL FOR PRYING FORCES IN T-HANGER CONNECTIONS WITH SNUG TIGHTENED BOLTS

A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages

Hilti North America Installation Technical Manual Technical Data MI System Version

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 17/P ZONE STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF HULL STRUCTURE OF ROLL ON/ROLL OFF SHIP

research report Design Example for Analytical Modeling of a Curtainwall and Considering the Effects of Bridging (All-Steel Design Approach)

BEAMS AND PLATES ANALYSIS

Minimum-weight design of built-up wideflange

BEAM DEFLECTION THE ELASTIC CURVE

Transcription:

Tamkang Journal of Science and Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 381 389 (2009) 381 Numerical Approach for Torsion Properties of Built-Up Runway Girders Wei T. Hsu, Dung M. Lue* and Bor T. Hsiao Department of Civil Engineering, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan 402, R.O.C. Abstract It is a common practice in a crane runway girder to place a channel, open-side down, over the top flange of a W-shape. The crane runway girder with section mentioned above called as WC (W-shape with Channel Cap) or SC (S-shape with Channel Cap) girder by authors is an efficient and economical one. The warping constants (C w ) of the WC/SC girders are not provided in the AISC design manuals because the C w calculation for a WC/SC section is not a routine process but a tedious task. This study summarizes the theoretical C w formulas which are expressed in terms of mathematical integration. The integration formulas can be written in terms of numerical expressions by considering the fact that the section is made up of thin-walled plate elements. Since the C w which in terms of numerical expressions is too complicated to be completed by hand-held calculators, the C w is set to be calculated by computer. The accuracy of computer-assisted results is compared with the Australian built-up sections of crane runway girder and the results are quite compatible. The calculated values of C w will make engineers to better evaluate the elastic critical moment (M cr ) of the girders with WC/SC sections. Key Words: Runway Girder, Warping Constants, WC/SC Girder 1. Introduction The WC/SC section (refer to Figure1) resisting an applied torsional moment is subjected to pure torsional stresses, warping shear stresses, and warping normal stresses. The evaluation of warping related stresses is not an easy task for practicing engineers and the difficulty comes from the calculation of warping constant (C w ). The C w values of open thin-walled section are provided in the AISC design manuals (1989 [1], 1993 [2], 1999 [3], 2005 [4]) for some practical sections but not for WC/SC sections. The C w calculation of a WC/SC section is not a routine process but is a tedious and complicated task. *Corresponding author. E-mail: dmlue@dragon.nchn.edu.tw This study aims to manipulate theoretical formulas which expressed in terms of mathematical integration. Viewing the fact that the section is made up of open thin-walled plate elements, the integration formulas can be written in terms of numerical expressions. Because the warping constant C w, which in terms of numerical expressions, is too complicated to be completed by hand-held calculators, the C w is set to be calculated by computer. The accuracy of computer-assisted results are checked and identified with the Australian built-up section of crane runway girder, which is a lipped section (refer to Figure 2) closely approximates the WC/SC section. The comparison results are quite compatible. The obtained C w values will make practicing engineers to calculate the elastic critical moment (M cr )of WC/SC girders much easier as compared with the ones provided by the current LRFD Specification [4].

382 Wei T. Hsu et al. Figure 1. Built-up WC and SC sections. 2. Integration Formulas for Warping Constant of WC/SC Section According to Galambos [5] and Heins [6], the integration formulas for warping constants of open thinwalled sections which include the WC/SC sections can be summarized (refer to Figures 3) and are given as follows. To calculate the value of C w, the centroid of section and the shear center of section had to be located first. Based on the basic mechanics, the centroid of section C(X c, Y c ), refer to Figures 3, can be given as follows. The centroid of section: C(X c, Y c ) (1) x and y are the x and y coordinates of da along the section and A is the area of open thin-walled section. According to Galambos [5], the shear center of section S(X s, Y s ), refer to Figure 3, can be given as follows. The shear center of section: S(X s, Y s ) and y axes, respectively. The term w is the warping deformation of any point on the middle line a distance s from the edge o and the terms I wx and I wy are warping products of inertia about x and y axes, respectively. I wx and I wy can be obtained by performing the integration, some algebra and noting that cos ij = (x j x i )/L ij (refer to Figure 5). The warping constant of section: C w Figure 2. Section for Australian runway Beam. (3) (3.a) (3.b) (3.c) (2) (2.a) (2.b) The terms I x and I y are moments of inertia about the x Figure 3. Thin-walled open cross section.

Numerical Approach for Torsion Properties of Built-Up Runway Girders 383 W n the normalized unit warping, w s the unit warping with respect to shear center, t the thickness of plate element, s the distance between the tangent and the shear center, and A the area of section. 3. Numerical Formulas for Warping Constant of WC/SC Section Because the WC/SC sections are made up of open thin-walled plate elements (Figure 4), the computation of the torsional section properties can be greatly simplified by the fact that between points of intersection the unit warping properties w, w s, and W n vary linearly (Figure 5). The theoretical integration formulas based on Galambos [5] can be written in terms of numerical expressions and are given as follows. The centroid of section: C(X c, Y c ) (4) x i and y i are the x-coordinate and y-coordinate of plate element i, respectively, and A i is the area of plate element i. The shear center of section: S(X s, Y s ) have I xy = 0 and above equations of shear center can be rewritten as follows. (6) (6.a) (6.b) (6.c) The unit warping property w is the unit warping with respect to the centroid. x i and x j are the x coordinates of the ends of the element. y i and y j are the y coordinates of the ends of the element. w i and w j are the corresponding values of w at the ends of element. t the thickness of plate element, ij the distance between the tangent of element ij and the centroid and L ij the length of element ij. The warping constant of section: (7) (5) I xy is the product of inertia. Because the built-up sections of WC/SC are singly symmetrical sections, we (7.a) Figure 4. WC section. Figure 5. Distribution of warping deformation w on a plate element.

384 Wei T. Hsu et al. (7.b) (7.c) The unit warping properties w s and W n are the unit warping with respect to the shear center and the normalized unit warping, respectively. w s the unit warping with respect to shear center. w si and w sj are the corresponding values of w s at the ends of element, t ij is the thickness of plate element ij, ij the distance between the tangent of element ij and the centroid and L ij the length of element ij. 4. Numerical Steps for Calculation of Warping Constant The numerical steps for the calculation of WC/SC warping constant is summarized as follows. (1) The centroid of section: C(X c, Y c ) (4) Section properties of C15 33.9 based on the AISC design manual. A =9.96in. 2, d =15.00in., t w =0.400in., b f =3.400in., t f = 0.650 in. (1) The centroid of section : C(X c, Y c ) The coordinates and areas for each plate element (i) of the WC section are summarized as given in Table 1. Substitute these values (x i, y i, and A i included in Table 1) into the formula of centroid (Eq. 5) and the values of X c and Y c can be obtained. The coordinates for the centroid (X c, Y c )= (7.500 in., 21.146 in.) with respect to the lower left corner, the origin of the coordinates as shown in Figure 4. (2) The shear center of section: S(X s, Y s ) The terms I x and I y are moments of inertia about the x and y axes, respectively. The I x and I y values of the builtup section can be calculated by using the tabulated values given in the AISC design manual and be calculated as below. I x = I x(w-shape) + I y(channel) + A w d 1 2 + A c d 2 2 = 11372 in. 4 I y = I y(w-shape) + I x(channel) = 583 in. 4 (2) The shear center of section: S(X s, Y s ) (3) The warping constant of section: C w (6) (7) A w theareaofw-shape,a c theareaofchannel,d 1 = the distance between the y coordinate of centroid of built-up section and the centroid of w-shape section, d 2 = the distance between the y coordinate of centroid of built-up section and the y coordinate of centroid of channel. To obtain the warping product of inertia (I wx ), the parameters including x i, x j, w i, w j, t ij,andl ij are required and are listed in Tables 2, 3, and 4. Substitute these 5. Illustrated Example Proceed the steps specified in the previous section to evaluate the warping constant of a built-up section made of W36 150 and C15 33.9. The built-up section is divided into eleven plate elements and their related joint numbers are given as shown in Figure 4. Solution: unit conversion 1 in. = 2.54 cm Section properties of W36 150 based on the AISC design manual. A = 44.2 in. 2, d = 35.85 in., t w = 0.625 in., b f = 11.975 in., t f =0.940in. Table 1. Coordinates and areas of plate elements element no. (i) x i (in.) y i (in.) A i (in. 2 ) 01 04.506 00.470 5.628 02 07.500 17.925 21.2310 03 04.506 35.580 8.023 04 01.512 35.580 0.000 05 00.756 36.050 0.605 06 00.325 34.350 1.950 07 10.494 00.470 5.628 08 10.494 35.580 8.023 09 13.488 35.580 0.000 10 14.244 36.050 0.605 11 14.675 34.350 1.950

Numerical Approach for Torsion Properties of Built-Up Runway Girders 385 Table 2. Joint coordinates, lengths, and thicknesses of plate element element no. joint no. x i/ x j (in.) y i/ y j (in.) L ij (in.) t ij (in.) 01 1(i) -5.988- -20.676-05.988 0.940 2(j) 0.000-20.676-02 2(i) 0.000-20.676-35.110 0.625 3(j) 0.000 14.434 03 3(i) 0.000 14.434 05.988 1.340 4(j) -5.988-14.434 04 4(i) -5.988- -14.434-00.470 0.000 5(j) -5.988-14.904 05 5(i) -5.988-14.904 01.188 0.400 6(j) -7.175-14.904 06 6(i) -7.175-14.904 03.200 0.650 7(j) -7.175-11.704 07 8(i) 5.988-20.676-05.988 0.940 2(j) 0.000-20.676-08 9(i) 5.988 14.434 05.988 1.340 3(j) 0.000 14.434 09 10(i) 5.988 14.904 00.470 0.000 9(j) 5.988 14.434 10 11(i) 7.175 14.904 01.188 0.400 10(j) 5.988 14.904 11 12(i) 7.175 11.704 03.200 0.650 11(j) 7.175 14.904 Table 3. Unit wrappings w i and w j element no. ij (in.) L ij (in.) w ij (in. 2 ) joint no. w i (in. 2 ) w j (in. 2 ) 01 20.676 5.988 123.800 1(i) 0.000 2(j) 123.800 02 0.000 35.1100 0.000 2(i) 123.800 3(j) 123.800 03 14.434 5.988 86.421 3(i) 123.800 4(j) 210.221 04-5.988 0.470-2.814 4(i) 210.221 5(j) 207.407 05 14.907 1.188 17.698 5(i) 207.407 6(j) 225.105 06 7.175 3.200 22.960 6(i) 225.105 7(j) 248.065 07-20.676 5.988-123.80 8(i) 247.600 2(j) 123.800 08 14.434 5.988 86.421 9(i) 37.378 3(j) 123.800 09-5.988 0.470-2.814 10(i) 40.192 9(j) 037.378 10 14.904 1.188 17.698 11(i) 22.494 10(j) 040.192 11 7.175 3.200 22.960 12(i) -0.465 11(j) 022.494

386 Wei T. Hsu et al. Table 4. Calculation for warping product of inertia (I wx ) 1 element no. w i x i w j x j t ij L ij 3 ( + ) w 1 i x j w j x i ( + ) 6 01 0 0 5.629 0 0 0-741.31-695.47 02 0 0 21.9440 0 0 0 0 03 0-1258.8 8.024-3366.87 0-741.31 0-991.38 04-1258.8-1241.9 0 0-1258.80-1241.95 0 05-1241.9-1615.1 0.475 0-452.36-1488.15-1347.93-224.52 06-1615.1-1779.9 2.080-2353.87-1615.13-1779.87-1176.93-07 -1482.6 0 5.629-2781.85 0-0741.31-695.47 08-0223.8 0 8.024-0598.59 0-0741.31-991.38 09-0240.6-0223.8 0 0-0240.67-0233.82 0 10-0161.4-0240.6 0.475-0063.65-0134.70-0288.38-033.49 11 000-3.3-0161.4 2.080-0109.62 000-3.33-0161.40-054.80-2619.39-1313.16- I wx = + = -3932.55 in. 5 parameters (x i, x j, w i, w j, t ij,andl ij ) into the given formulae (Equations 6, 6.a, 6.b, and 6.c) and the value of I wx can be obtained. The shear center of section is then determined by using Eq. (6) and Y s = I wx / I y = 3932.55 / 583.13 = 6.744 in. Therefore, the shear center is S (X s, Y s ) = (0 in., 6.74 in.) or S (X s, Y s ) = (7.50 in., 27.89 in.) with respect to left lower corner as shown in Figure 4. (3) The warping constant of section: (C w ) The required parameters including w si, w sj, W ni, W nj, t ij, and L ij are listed in Tables 5, 6, 7, and 8. Substitute these values (w si, w sj, W ni, W nj, t ij, L ij and refer to Figure 4) Table 5. Unit wrappings w si and w sj element no. sij (in) L ij (in) sij L ij (in 2 ) joint i, j w si w sj 01 27.4200 5.988 1(i) 000.000 2(j) 02 0.000 35.1100 0.000 2(i) 3(j) 03 7.690 5.988 46.042 3(i) 4(j) 210.221 04-5.988-0.470-2.814 4(i) 210.221 5(j) 207.407 05 8.160 1.188 9.690 5(i) 207.407 6(j) 217.097 06 7.175 3.200 22.960 6(i) 217.097 7(j) 240.057 07-27.420-0 5.988-8(i) 328.357 2(j) 08 7.690 5.988 46.042 9(i) 118.136 3(j) 09-5.988-0.470-2.814 10(i) 120.950 9(j) 118.136 10 8.160 1.188 9.690 11(i) 111.261 10(j) 120.950 11 7.175 3.200 22.960 12(i) 088.301 11(j) 111.261

Numerical Approach for Torsion Properties of Built-Up Runway Girders 387 Table 6. Values of W ni +w si or W nj +w sj element no. t ij (in.) L ij (in.) joint i, j w si w sj t ij L ij A (in. 2 ) (CV) * i (in. 2 ) 01 0.940 5.988 1(i) 000.000 2(j) 5.629 54.357 0924.164 02 0.625 35.1100 2(i) 3(j) 21.9440 54.357 7205.488 03 1.340 5.988 3(i) 4(j) 210.221 8.024 54.357 3004.185 04 0.000 0.470 4(i) 210.221 5(j) 207.407 0 54.357 0 05 0.400 1.188 5(i) 207.407 6(j) 217.097 0.475 54.357 0201.639 06 0.650 3.200 6(i) 217.097 7(j) 240.057 2.080 54.357 950.88 07 0.940 5.988 8(i) 328.357 2(j) 5.629 54.357 2772.485 08 1.340 5.988 9(i) 118.136 3(j) 8.024 54.357 2265.295 09 0.000 0.470 10(i) 120.950 9(j) 118.136 0 54.357 0 10 0.400 1.188 11(i) 111.261 10(j) 120.950 0.475 54.357 0110.300 11 0.650 3.200 12(i) 088.301 11(j) 111.261 2.080 54.357 0415.087 (CV) i 17849.52 in 2 ( CV ) W w W w (refer to Eqs. 7.a and 7.b) ; i ni si nj sj n n 1 1 CV ( w w ) t L ( CV ) in. 2A 2 si sj ij ij i 1 A 1 2 Table 7. Values of W ni and W nj element no. joint i, j w si w sj CV (in. 2 ) W ni W nj 01 1(i) 000.000-2(j) 0 02 2(i) 0 3(j) 0 03 3(i) 0 4(j) 210.221-46.042 04 4(i) 210.221 0-46.042 5(j) 207.407-43.228 05 5(i) 207.407 0-43.228 6(j) 217.097-52.918 06 6(i) 217.097 0-52.918 7(j) 240.057-75.878 07 8(i) 328.357-2(j) 0 08 9(i) 118.136-046.042 3(j) 0 09 10(i) 120.950-043.228 9(j) 118.136-46.045 10 11(i) 111.261-052.918 10(j) 120.950-43.228 11 12(i) 088.301-075.878 11(j) 111.261-52.918

388 Wei T. Hsu et al. Table 8. Calculation for warping constant of built-up WC section 2 2 element no. t ij L ij joint i, j W ni W nj Wni W ni W nj Wnj 01 5.629 02 21.9440 03 8.024 04 0 05 0.475 06 2.080 07 5.629 08 8.024 09 0 10 0.475 11 2.080 1(i) - 2(j) 0 26954.70 0 0 50576 2(i) 0 3(j) 0 0 0 0 0 3(i) 0 4(j) -46.042 0 0 2119.9 5670 4(i) 0-46.042 5(j) -43.228 2119.9 1990.3 1868.7 0 5(i) 0-43.228 6(j) -52.918 1868.7 2287.5 2800.3 1101 6(i) 0-52.918 7(j) -75.878 2800.3 4015.3 5757.5 8717 8(i) - 2(j) 0 26954.70 0 0 505760 9(i) 0-46.042 3(j) 0 2119.9 0 0 5670 10(i) 0-43.228 9(j) -46.045 1868.7 1990.4 2120.1 0 11(i) 0-52.918 10(j) -43.228 2800.3 2287.5 1868.7 1101 12(i) 0-75.878 11(j) -52.918 5757.5 4015.3 2800.3 8717 Warping Constant (C w ) = 132128 in. 6 C (w)i into the formula of warping constant (Eqs. 7, 7.a, 7.b, and 7.c) and Therefore, the warping constant of the built-up section equal to 132128 in. 6. 6. Warping Constant of Australian Crane Runway Girder The following equation for warping constant is provided by the Australian Institute of Steel Construction [7] for the calculation of rolled crane runway beam. (refer to Figure 2) (8) T e = A c / d c (8.b) I yt the moment of inertia of top flange about y-axis, I yb the moment of inertia of bottom flange about y-axis, D the depth of the beam, T e the effective thickness of top flange, T b the thickness of bottom flange, A c theareaofchannel,andd c the depth of channel. The C w value for the Australian Built-up Section of Crane Runway beam is calculated by using the above formula (Equation 8) is given as follows. I yt = A i x i 2 + I yy = 2(15 1.6)(20.8) 2 +2 (1/12) 15 1.6 3 + (1/12) 2 40 3 = 31.443 10 3 cm 4 I yb = 1.6 (30) 3 / 12 = 3.6 10 3 cm 4 A c =40 2+2 15 1.6 = 128 cm 2 h = D (T e T b ) / 2 (8.a) T e =A c /d c = 128 / 43.2 = 2.96 cm h = D (T e T b ) / 2 = 120 (2.96 + 1.6) / 2 = 117.72 cm

Numerical Approach for Torsion Properties of Built-Up Runway Girders 389 C w =(h 2 I yt I yb )/(I yt + I yb ) = (117.72 2 31.443 10 3 36.0 10 2 ) / (31.443 10 3 + 3.6 10 3 ) = 44763672 cm 6 The C w value evaluated using the proposed steps specified in this study is equal to 132128 in. 6 = 46366900 cm 6. The difference is 3.45% and its calculation is given by (44763672 46366900) / 46366900 = -3.45%. It can be concluded that the accuracy of the evaluated C w is quite compatible. with the Australian rolled section of crane runway girder. 7. Conclusion This research summarizes the integration formulas and the formulas in terms of numerical expressions for crane runway girders made of WC or SC sections. 1. This research gives all warping constant values of listed sections in the AISC design manuals (ASD and LRFD). The warping constants evaluated using the proposed steps in this study. 2. The accuracy of computer-assisted results is compared with the Australian built-up section of crane runway girder and the result is quite compatible. 3. This research provides a better evaluation for the WC or SC sections when involve the warping constants of section. References [1] AISC, Allowable Stress Design Manual of Steel Construction, 9 th Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois (1989). [2] AISC, Load and Resistance Factor Design Manual of Steel Construction, 2 nd Edition, American Institute Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois (1993). [3] AISC, Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, 3 rd Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, Illinois (1999). [4] AISC, Design Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, 13 th edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, Illinois (2005). [5] Galambos, T. V., Structural Members and Frames, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 27 53 (1968). [6] Heins, C. P., Bending and Torsional Design in Structural Members, D. C. Heath Co., pp. 5 80 (1969). [7] AISC, Crane Runway Girders, Australian Institute of Steel Construction, Milsons Point, NSW, Australia, pp. 45 47 (1983). Manuscript Received: Jul. 3, 2008 Accepted: Mar. 5, 2009