The PRIMEX Experiment: A Fundamental Test of the Chiral Anomaly Prediction in QCD. Erik Minges April 23 rd, 2010

Similar documents
Beam Test Result for a Prototype PbWO 4 Calorimeter. by Matthew Reece

The π 0 Lifetime Experiment and Future Plans at JLab

The π 0 Lifetime: Experimental Probe of. Dustin E. McNulty MIT/UMass for the PrimEx Collaboration April 16, 2008

QCD in the light quark (up & down) sector (QCD-light) has two mass scales M(GeV)

Dedicated Arrays: MEDEA GDR studies (E γ = MeV) Highly excited CN E*~ MeV, 4 T 8 MeV

PrimEx Experiments and the Prospects of Rare η Decays at GlueX

Overview and Status of Measurements of F 3π at COMPASS

Search for Gluonic Excitations with GlueX at Jefferson Lab

Quantum Field Theory. and the Standard Model. !H Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS MATTHEW D. SCHWARTZ. Harvard University

The Determination of Beam Asymmetry from Double Pion Photoproduction

Study of the decays at Wasa-at-COSY. Elisabetta Prencipe on behalf of the Wasa Collaboration MesonNet Workshop, 17th -19th June 2013, Praha

Status of PRad Experiment

Elementary Particles, Flavour Physics and all that...

Measurement of Polarization Observables Pz, P s z and P c z in Double-Pion Photoproduction off the Proton

ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION. Aram Teymurazyan. The Graduate School. University of Kentucky

Measuring Form Factors and Structure Functions With CLAS

The Standard Model of Electroweak Physics. Christopher T. Hill Head of Theoretical Physics Fermilab

Search for a Z at an e + e - Collider Thomas Walker

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

Electroweak Physics. Krishna S. Kumar. University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Sven Schumann. DPG Spring Meeting

Lucite Hodoscope for SANE

Calorimetry I Electromagnetic Calorimeters

Studying η-meson Decays with WASA-at-COSY

Lecture 7. both processes have characteristic associated time Consequence strong interactions conserve more quantum numbers then weak interactions

Space-Time Symmetries

Recent results and perspectives on pseudo-scalar mesons and form factors at BES III

Introduction to the Standard Model. 1. e+e- annihilation and QCD. M. E. Peskin PiTP Summer School July 2005

Mukesh Saini. Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL. February 26, FSU Nuclear Physics Seminar. February 26

The Why, What, and How? of the Higgs Boson

Measurement of the π 0 Lifetime: QCD Axial Anomaly and Chiral Corrections. INT Sept, A.M. Bernstein MIT

Elementary Particle Physics

The reaction p(e,e'p)π 0 to calibrate the Forward and the Large Angle Electromagnetic Shower Calorimeters

Neutrino Helicity Measurement

Meson spectroscopy at CLAS and CLAS12: the present and the future. Raffaella De Vita INFN Genova for the CLAS Collaboration

Threshold photoproduction of J/y with the GlueX experiment. Lubomir Pentchev Jefferson Lab for the GlueX collaboration

Discovery of charged bottomonium-like Z b states at Belle

Correction for PMT temperature dependence of the LHCf calorimeters

Light-Meson Spectroscopy at Jefferson Lab

A4 Laser Compton polarimetry

Simulation study of scintillatorbased

Parity Violation and Topological Currents

Highenergy Nuclear Optics of Polarized Particles

Physics at Hadron Colliders

Reminder : scenarios of light new physics

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

The Neutral-Particle Spectrometer

Contents. Preface to the First Edition Preface to the Second Edition

Lecture 03. The Standard Model of Particle Physics. Part II The Higgs Boson Properties of the SM

Analysis of the forbidden decay 0 +e + +e with WASA-at-COSY

INTRODUCTION TO NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS

CLEO c. Anders Ryd Cornell University June 7, e e cc D D. D K,D K e

NUCLEAR FORCES. Historical perspective

The Tiny Muon versus the Standard Model. Paul Debevec Physics 403 November 14 th, 2017

P3TMA Experimental Projects

Particle Identification of the LHCb detector

Conclusion. 109m Ag isomer showed that there is no such broadening. Because one can hardly

- ~200 times heavier than the e GeV µ travels on average. - does not interact strongly. - does emit bremsstrahlung in

Propagation in the Galaxy 2: electrons, positrons, antiprotons

Hadron structure with photon and antiproton induced reactions - QCD in the non-perturbative range -

Threshold Photo-production of J/5 Mesons J. Dunne Jefferson Lab

Reconstruction in Collider Experiments (Part IX)

Outline. Charged Leptonic Weak Interaction. Charged Weak Interactions of Quarks. Neutral Weak Interaction. Electroweak Unification

Lecture 3: Quarks and Symmetry in Quarks

Building a Tracking Detector for the P2 Experiment

Adam Para, Fermilab CALOR2010, IHEP, Beijing May 14, 2010 TOTAL ABSORPTION HOMOGENEOUS CALORIMETER WITH DUAL READOUT

Effective Field Theory for Nuclear Physics! Akshay Vaghani! Mississippi State University!

Overview of validations at LHC

The chiral anomaly and the eta-prime in vacuum and at low temperatures

Dark Matter Searches with AMS-02. AMS: Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer

SciBar and future K2K physics. F.Sánchez Universitat Aútonoma de Barcelona Institut de Física d'altes Energies

1 The pion bump in the gamma reay flux

Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays propagation I

Standard Model of Particle Physics SS 2013

Status Report on the Precision Measurement of d n 2

Recent results at the -meson region from the CMD-3 detector at the VEPP-2000 collider

Analysis of Lepton Pair Production at GlueX

CMS ECAL status and performance with the first LHC collisions

Hadronic D Decays and the D Meson Decay Constant with CLEO c

High-t Meson Photoproduction: Experimental Capabilities

Moskov Amaryan Old Dominion University On behalf of the CLAS Collaboration

Lecture 3. lecture slides are at:

Vacuum Energy and the cosmological constant puzzle

Lecture 2 & 3. Particles going through matter. Collider Detectors. PDG chapter 27 Kleinknecht chapters: PDG chapter 28 Kleinknecht chapters:

Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data

Hidden Sector particles at SNS

An Introduction to the Standard Model of Particle Physics

Proton Radius Puzzle and the PRad Experiment at JLab

Lecture 8. CPT theorem and CP violation

The Bohr Model of Hydrogen

NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS (PH242) PARTICLE PHYSICS

The Standard Model of Particle Physics - I

Measurement of the η-mass from the reaction γp pη in threshold region

The Large Area Telescope on-board of the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Mission

Angular Correlation Experiments

Status report on parity violation in the (1232) resonance

The Forward Tagger for CLAS12 at Jefferson Laboratory and the MesonEx experiment

Introduction. Tau leptons. SLHC. Summary. Muons. Scott S. Snyder Brookhaven National Laboratory ILC Physics and Detector workshop Snowmass, Aug 2005

Calorimeter for detection of the high-energy photons

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

Transcription:

The PRIMEX Experiment: A Fundamental Test of the Chiral Anomaly Prediction in QCD Erik Minges April 23 rd, 2010

Outline Symmetry and conservation Laws Overview and examples PRIMEX physics motivation The Chiral Anomaly Experimental Setup PRIMEX first run results Prototype detector beamtest Energy calibration, shower profile, position resolution Conclusion

Symmetry What is it? Generalized to mean invariance A system which remains unchanged under a certain kind of transformation. Rotational symmetry of a pencil Symmetry Breaking Rotational Symmetry

Powerful tool in physics Symmetry cont. In 1905, Amalie Noether determined the connection between symmetry and conservation laws Noether s theorem For every continuous mathematical symmetry, there is a corresponding conservation law. it is only slightly overstating that physics is the study of symmetry. Philip Warren Anderson American Physicist and Nobel Laureate Contributions to theories of localization, antiferromagnetism, and high-temperature superconductivity

PRIMEX Experiment The PRIMEX experiment at Thomas Jefferson National Lab is to measure the lifetime of the π 0 particle with high precision. This experiment is a very important test of Quantum Chromodynamics (the theory to describe the strong interaction).

PRIMEX Physics Motivation Prediction of the 0 decay width in Chiral Anomaly is exact in the Chiral limit. However quarks have mass. Leads to correction in theory. Neutral Pion decay measured to test fundamental prediction of low energy QCD. 0 High precision measurement of decay rate, dominated by axial anomaly.

Chiral Anomaly Axial symmetry of the Classical Lagrangian of Quantum Chromodynamics is broken in the Chiral limit. Chiral limit is when the up, down quark masses vanish. This symmetry breaking is of pure Quantum mechanical origin due to quantization. The Lagrangian has continuous symmetry, but no conservation law associated with it i.e. - no conserved current

Confirmation of Quark Color In the chiral limit, the predicted decay amplitude A N (3f Where N C 3 is the number of quark colors in QCD and f 92. 42MeV is the Pion decay constant. Precise predicted decay width C ) 2.51310 Number of quark colors will be directly measured by this experiment Number colors most fundamental parameter in Physics 2 GeV m 1 3 A 64 2 7.725eV

Primakoff Effect Virtual photon from nucleus of target interacts with tagged photon from incident photon beam. Virtual photon and tagged photon create neutral Pi meson Photopion production from Coulomb field of nucleus. Pion decay in forward direction, so need good central resolution. Pi zero has high branching ratio to decay into 2 gamma rays, which HYCAL can detect.

Experimental Setup Helium bag less particle interaction than air and cheaper than vacuum Magnet measure pair production to monitor photon flux and sweep out charged particles Electron beam passing through nucleus field and change momentum, produce Bremsstrahlung radiation Physics target (Primakoff) Radiator Measure energy and momentum of scattered electrons yield energy and momentum of gamma produced

Status of PRIMEX PrimEx-I () = 7.82eV2.2%2.1% Next toleading Order Chiral Anomaly Leading Order Chiral Anomaly

Analysis Results for the 6x6 PbWO 4 Crystal Prototype Detector Beam Test Center Crystals PbWO4 Surrounding Lead Glass

My Project for PRIMEX What is the need for an energy calibration? 36 PbWO 4 crystals detect incident beam energy via ADC Meaningful average pulse height signal from ADC requires calibration of each crystal using known incident beam energies How is the incident E beam beam energy found? x-y coordinate detector with 60 scintillating fibers on each axis Detects position of incident electrons. Each fiber approximately 2 mm in diameter e Dipole magnet s field yields incident energy of electrons Incident electron beam energy as a function of X fiber number is 1 4 2 6 3 X 3.5004 0.1515310 * X 0.4611210 * X 0.1164510 X e

Relative Energy Calibration Alignment Each crystal needs to have the same response Align each individual crystal center Assume all incident energy is deposited at center of crystal Assume no energy is lost due to leakage into surrounding crystals Find mean ADC at center of crystal, divide by known incident energy E beam =A*(mean ADC) adc(1) for run 435 cut at (X=29) and (Y=31) mean ADC = 5413 i.e. For run 435 (centered on crystal 26) E beam = E(29) = 3.98145729105 (mean ADC) = 5413... so A = 7.35536171E-04!!!

Global Energy Calibration Absolute scale from 5x5 cluster size Shower interacts in several crystal Sum all deposited energy in surrounding crystals to account for leakage E beam = B*[ A i * (mean ADC) i ] i.e. For run 419 (centered on crystal 15) E beam = E(29) = 3.98145729105 A i * (mean ADC) I = 5.095... so B =.781444021796!!! with σ/e re =.018637880275 419 Now just take the average value of the four center crystals B avg =.781858818128

Results - Ratio of Energies Deposited in a single module Error bars for (E re /E beam )associated with run 413 Maximum deposited energy is at center of crystal. Minimum deposited energy is at boundary of crystal. (As expected) 21 22 23

Results - Energy Resolution of the Prototype Error bars for (σ/e re )associated with run 413 21 22 23 Energy resolution at center is greater than at boundaries of crystal. (As expected) 21 22 23

Results - Shower Profile The shower profile measures the dependence of the average pulse-height ratio for different crystal channels 1.) Adjacent Channel ratio A i /A i+1 2.) Adjacent Row ratio A j /A j+1 3.) Separated Channel ratio A i+1 /A i-1

Results - Adjacent Channel Ratio Run 435 for E26/E27 1 26 27 Boundary

Results - Adjacent Row Ratio Run 422 E3,9,15/E4,10,16 1 3, 9, 15 4, 10, 16 Boundary

Results - Separated Channels Ratio Run 435 for E28/E26 1 26 27 28 Center: 27

Reconstructed Position Method Center of Gravity Method Weight factor for cell Linear Weight where, Logarithmic Weight ) ( )* ( i N i i i i N i i cal E x E x ) ( i i E T i i i E E E ) ( N i E T E i T i i i E E W E ln 0, max 0 th i

Linear - Reconstructed Position 3x3 run 389 3x3 run 422 10 11 9 10 8 9

Linear - Reconstructed Position 5x5 run 413 22 21 S shape indicates some systematic shift from the method incorporated.

Linear Position Resolution 3x3 run 389 3x3 run 422 8 9 10 9 10 11

Linear Position Resolution 5x5 run 413 21 22 Position resolution worst at boundaries and best at center

Logarithmic Reconstructed Position ~ %3 error (leakage) 3x3 run 389 3x3 run 422 10 ~ %3 error (leakage) 11 9 10 8 9

Logarithmic Reconstructed Position 5x5 run 413 (No systematic shift) 22 21

Logarithmic Position Resolution 3% error 3x3 run 389 3x3 run 422 8 9 10 9 10 11

Logarithmic Position Resolution 5x5 run 413 1% error 21 22

Linear or Logarithmic Weight? Linear weight - large systematic errors Radial energy fall off of showers is exponential Energy deposited in the module decreases exponentially as a function of the distance from the point of incidence.

Logarithmic Weight Ideal weight must employ a logarithmically weighted energy due to the exponential fall off of the shower profile The logarithmically weighting of the deposited energy signals produce the best results Which is what we were expecting from the results

Conclusion PRIMEX Experiment provide precision test on Chiral Anomaly prediction. Energy Resolution %1.7 at the center and %2.2 at boundaries Worse at edge of crystals Due to fluctuation of shower and energy leakage Reconstructed Position Center of gravity Linear has large systematic error Logarithmic is almost linear; small systematic shift

Thank You PrimEx! and my mentor: Dr. Gan - UNCW

Conservation Laws Symmetries in nature lead to conservation laws A particular measurable property of an isolated physical system does not change as the system evolves Corresponds to a conserved physical quantity. Conservation of energy, linear momentum, angular momentum, electric charge, probability, mass, etc. Usually derived from Lagrangian dynamics A reformulation of classical mechanics that combines conservation of momentum with conservation of energy.

Lagrangian Dynamics Lagrangian of a system is a classical method to derive Newton s second law of motion, F ma. Forces are hard to find. Lagrangian utilizes conservation of energy L xi, x i T xi, x i, t U xi, t, where is a generalized coordinate system L d L Lagrangian equation of motion: 0 xi dt x i Conservation Law If L x i L 0 x i x i C, where C is a constant.

Conservation Law second example Parity Violation Flip either one, or all spatial variable signs. Parity Example A mirror flips the original object by the vertical Parity of mirror = -1. Discontinuous symmetry > No conservation law. ),, ( ),, ( 1, ),, ( ),, ( 1, z y x z y x z y x z y x

Cross Section Cross section in particle physics expresses the likelihood of interaction between two particles. d Differential cross section, is the probability to observe a scattered particle per unit solid angle. d d d dns FN d t _ # Particles detected per second (Flux of incident particles)(# target particles)(detector area)