THE MOST PROSPECTIVE AREAS OF USE OF THERMAL WATERS FOR HEATING PURPOSES IN THE POLISH LOWLANDS

Similar documents
IN POLAND. Adam WÓJCICKI. National Research Institute

STORAGE POTENTIAL OF POLAND (THE BALTIC BASIN) Adam Wójcicki & Jolanta Pacześna, PGI-NRI

Belgian Geological data for deep geothermal Energy

Environment Protection Engineering VARIATION OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF SELECTED CONSTRUCTIONAL AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL PARAMETRES OF DRILLED WELLS

WP2 country review Lithuania

Comparative analysis of rock porosity in a selected region in the Carpathians based on laboratory data and well logs

Poland Bełchatów: storage in an onshore saline aquifer

Environment Protection Engineering VARIABILITY OF GRADIENTS OF THERMAL WATERS IN THE AREA OF LESSER POLAND VOIVODESHIP

Assessing the Effect of Realistic Reservoir Features on the Performance of Sedimentary Geothermal Systems

AAPG European Region Annual Conference Paris-Malmaison, France November RESOURCES PERSPECTIVES of the SOUTHERN PERMIAN BASIN AREA

Mathematical model of Baltic artesian basin

MUHAMMAD S TAMANNAI, DOUGLAS WINSTONE, IAN DEIGHTON & PETER CONN, TGS Nopec Geological Products and Services, London, United Kingdom

Characterization of Belloy, Kiskatinaw, and Debolt Water Disposal Zones in the Montney Play Area, NEBC

OIL AND GAS PLAYS OF THE MICHIGAN BASIN, SOUTHERN ONTARIO. Terry Carter, Consulting Geologist London, Ontario

Methodology: Ranking, Site Assessments & Volumetrics

NORTH AMERICAN ANALOGUES AND STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS IN DEVELOPING SHALE GAS PLAYS IN EUROPE Unconventional Gas Shale in Poland: A Look at the Science

WESTCARB Phase I Results Review

entered a rapid development phase. Annual increased proven reserves are above 500 billion cubic meters (bcm) from 2003, and annual natural gas product

Evolution of selected geochemical and reservoir factors influencing the exploitation of the Podhale geothermal system, S-Poland

EAS 233 Geologic Structures and Maps Winter Miscellaneous practice map exercises. 1. Fault and separation:

THE ANALYSIS OF EXPANSION THERMAL RESPONSE TEST (TRT) FOR BOREHOLE HEAT EXCHANGERS (BHE)

Relative secular variations of the geomagnetic field along the Zgorzelec-Wiżajny profile, Poland

Polish Geological Institute National Research. Tasks, people and equipment

HEAT TRANSFER IN A LOW ENTHALPY GEOTHERMAL WELL

Biology. Slide 1 of 40. End Show. Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall

WP 4.1. Site selection criteria and ranking methodology. Karen Kirk

Lab 9: Petroleum and groundwater

The Capitan Aquifer - Ellenburger Production Wells Geothermal Engine Source?

Next steps for verifying European CO2 storage capacity Perspectives from the Baltic Region

THE PODHALE GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM AND SPACE-HEATING PROJECT POLAND CASE STUDY

Results of Preliminary Study of Shale Gas and Shale Oil Perspectives in Georgia

Evaluating Suitability of Appalachian Basin Reservoirs for NGLs Storage Jessica Moore, West Virginia Geological & Economic Survey

Characterizing Seal Bypass Systems at the Rock Springs Uplift, Southwest Wyoming, Using Seismic Attribute Analysis*

Potential for Shale Gas in Georgia:

CO 2 Atlas Assessment of Geological Storage Potential

PRECAMBRIAN CRYSTALLINE AQUIFER (METAMORPHIC ROCKS)

Integrated Approach to Drilling Project in Unconventional Reservoir Using Reservoir Simulation

4. Carboniferous Zone Play Results

Petroleum Systems (Part One) Source, Generation, and Migration

FORMATION OF GROUNDWATER IN SEDIMENTARY BASINS: TRADITIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE MODELS

17-1 The Fossil Record Slide 2 of 40

History of Exploration and Exploitation of Geothermal Energy in the Zagreb Geothermal Area (Croatia)

APPENDIX C GEOLOGICAL CHANCE OF SUCCESS RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

Integrating Geomechanics and Reservoir Characterization Examples from Canadian Shale Plays

Research Article. Experimental Analysis of Laser Drilling Impacts on Rock Properties

Tim Carr - West Virginia University

Could the Himalaya be Self-Sufficient in Conventional and Unconventional Hydrocarbon Resources

Relinquishment Report

Tim Carr - West Virginia University

UK data for geothermal resource assessments

UNCONVENTIONAL OIL & GAS POTENTIAL IN PORTUGAL

Potential Hydrocarbon Discoveries in Bjelovar Subdepression, Croatia By Tomislav Malvic 1 and Igor Rusan 2

CHAPTER III. METHODOLOGY

Risk Factors in Reservoir Simulation

17-1 The Fossil Record Slide 1 of 40

Assessing our untapped energy resources. Derek Reay Geological Survey of Northern Ireland

International Workshop on Groundwater Systems in Europe, August, 2013 Berlin

Reservoir Modeling for Wabamun Area CO2 Sequestration Project (WASP) Davood Nowroozi

GeothermEx, Inc. GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR THE SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATION HOLE PROGRAM, KILAUEA EAST RIFT ZONE, HAWAII TASK 1 REPORT

An Overview of the Tapia Canyon Field Static Geocellular Model and Simulation Study

Opportunities in Oil and Gas Fields Questions TABLE OF CONTENTS

Essentials of Geology, 11e

RATE OF FLUID FLOW THROUGH POROUS MEDIA

Deep geological structures as revealed by 3D gravity stripping: western part of the Moesian Platform, Romania

MODULE PREREQUISITES FOR HYDROCARBON ACCUMULATION

MUDLOGGING, CORING, AND CASED HOLE LOGGING BASICS COPYRIGHT. Coring Operations Basics. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

UNFC and National Classifications National Case Study - Poland

1. LICENCE INFORMATION. P209 Block 9/29a ALL. U.K. Block 9/29a (Part Block) Operator/Partners TAQA Bratani Ltd 81%, RWE DEA UK 19%

Modelling of CO 2 storage and long term behaviour in the Casablanca field

Lithium Brines: What can we learn from established brine production regions?

P105 Particularities of Astrakhan Gas Field Deep Structure Resulting from Microseismic Sounding Technique Application

6162 Upper Rhine Graben: 3D Seismic - A New Approach to Geothermal Exploration in a Structurally Complex Tectonic Enviroment

Geological Survey of Alabama Groundwater Assessment Program

Harvey Thorleifson, Director, Minnesota Geological Survey. Status of geological mapping needed for groundwater protection in Minnesota

Integrated well log and 3-D seismic data interpretation for the Kakinada area of KG PG offshore basin

The development of a geo-database of caprock quality and deep saline aquifers distribution suitable to geological storage of CO 2 in Italy

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Geology Commons

COMPAGNIE MINIÈRE CONGOLAISE S.P.R.L. - CoMiCo

NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE (NMR) AND MERCURY POROSIMETRY MEASUREMENTS FOR PERMEABILITY DETERMINATION

Geothermal power generation in the Upper Rhine Valley The Project Offenbach/Pfalz

GY 111: Physical Geology

Petroleum geology framework, West Coast offshore region

40 th Anniversary Chemical Characteristics of Geothermal Fluids in Jiaodong Peninsula, Shandong, China. Tingting Zheng Student UNU GTP

Concept of an Integrated Workflow for Geothermal Exploration in Hot Sedimentary Aquifers

Finding Large Capacity Groundwater Supplies for Irrigation

3.0 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY

Extended Abstract for presentation at EAGE Meeting Paris 13/ History of Norwegian Petroleum Exploration and its impact on Norwegian Geosciences

Determination of Geothermal Gradient in the Eastern Niger Delta Sedimentary Basin from Bottom Hole Temperatures

Lithological variation of Middle Bakken reservoirs in SE Saskatchewan: implications for optimizing multi-stage hydraulic fracturing

Exploring Eastern Africa. East Africa Oil and Gas Summit, 2014 March 2014

Evaluation of Subsurface Formation of Pabna District, Bangladesh

Chapter 13. Groundwater

Downloaded 09/15/16 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

EGAS. Ministry of Petroleum

Pros and Cons against Reasonable Development of Unconventional Energy Resources

Study on the Four- property Relationship of Reservoirs in YK Area of Ganguyi Oilfield

THE IMPACT OF LANDSLIDE AREAS ON MUNICIPAL SPATIAL PLANNING

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12

Reservoir Rock Properties COPYRIGHT. Sources and Seals Porosity and Permeability. This section will cover the following learning objectives:

American Journal of Energy Engineering

Transcription:

BIULETYN PAÑSTWOWEGO INSTYTUTU GEOLOGICZNEGO 441: 27 32, 2010 R. THE MOST PROSPECTIVE AREAS OF USE OF THERMAL WATERS FOR HEATING PURPOSES IN THE POLISH LOWLANDS MAREK HAJTO 1,WOJCIECH GÓRECKI 1 Abstract. The paper presents results of assessment of geothermal energy resources accumulated within nine Paleozoic and Mesozoic aquifers in the Polish Lowlands, carried out within the framework of the project entitled Geothermal atlases of the Mesozoic and Paleozoic formations geological analysis and thermal water and energy resources in the Polish Lowlands. The project commissioned by the Polish Ministry of Environment was carried out in the years 2004 2006 by a research team of specialists from several institutions, with AGH University of Science and Technology in Kraków as a leader. The paper presents also the results of studies and proposals for geothermal investment projects in selected towns of central and northwestern Poland. Potential locations of the new geothermal projects are determined. Towns with the most favourable geological and hydrogeological conditions and appropriate market of heat consumers for a geothermal plant construction are indicated. The calculation area amounts approximately to 270 thousand km 2 that represents more than 87% of the territory of Poland. As regards the amount of accumulated energy, the most interesting and promising areas of the Polish Lowlands occur in the Warsaw, Mogilno ódÿ (in the central part of Poland) and Szczecin (in the northwestern part of Poland) troughs. Key words: geothermal energy, atlas of resources, Polish Lowlands. INTRODUCTION Poland is characterized by significant low-enthalpy geothermal resources, connected mostly with the Mesozoic sediments. Space heating represents the main type of direct uses. Five geothermal heating plants are in operation. The biggest one (Bañska Bia³y Dunajec) is located in the Podhale Trough (Carpathians Mts.), while the remaining operate in the Polish Lowlands: Mszczonów, Pyrzyce, Uniejów and Stargard Szczeciñski (Fig. 1). Total installed geothermal power is estimated at about 68 MWt with annual production of energy ranging about 393 TJ/a (Kêpiñska, 2010). IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL AQUIFERS WITHIN THE GEOLOGICAL PROFILE OF THE POLISH LOWLANDS Within the geological profiles of the Polish Lowlands, from the Early Paleozoic through Early Cretaceous age, a number of series reavealing good geothermal parameters are present (Górecki, ed., 2006a, b). Analysis of hydrogeological and thermal parameters of aquifers in the Polish Lowlands indicate the possibility of complex utilization of thermal waters, both for energy production and balneotherapy/recreation purposes. Geological analysis and calculation of geothermal resources concern nine major aquifers in the Polish Lowlands: Lower Cretaceous, Upper Jurassic, Middle Jurassic, Lower Jurassic, Upper Triassic and Lower Triassic aquifers of the Mesozoic formation, and Lower Permian, Carboniferous and Devonian aquifers of the Paleozoic formation. 1 AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, Department of Fossil Fuels, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland; e-mail: mhajto@agh.edu.pl

28 Marek Hajto, Wojciech Górecki Fig. 1. Location of towns with favorable conditions for construction of geothermal installations in the Polish Lowlands and existing geothermal heating plants in Poland Structural units: 1 Intra-Sudetic Depression, 2 Fore-Sudetic Region, 3 Szczecin Trough, 4 Pomeranian Swell, 5 Pomeranian Trough, 6 eba Elevation, 7 Peribaltic Syneclise, 8 Mazury Suwa³ki Elevation, 9 Podlasie Depression, 10 Warsaw Trough, 11 Kujawy Swell, 12 Mogilno ódÿ Trough, 13 uków Hrubieszów Elevation, 14 Lublin Trough, 15 Holy Cross Mts. Massif, 16 Lower San Elevation, 17 Miechów Trough, 18 Cracow-Silesian Monocline, 19 Upper Silesian Depression, 20 Carpathian Foredeep, 21 Outer Flysch Carpathians, 22 Pieniny Klippen Belt, 23 Podhale Trough, 24 Tatra Mts., 25 Sudety Mts. Existing heating plants: A Bañska Bia³y Dunajec, B Mszczonów, C Pyrzyce, D Uniejów, E Stargard Szczeciñski METHODOLOGY OF DATA INTERPRETATION Due to the broad spectrum of considered problems, various interpretation methods and techniques were applied, supported by database tools and basic statistical data processing procedures. The basic materials originated from interpretation of lithostratigraphic profiles and interpretation of well-log data due to identification of groundwater and sealing horizons in Paleozoic and Mesozoic formations. Full stratigraphic columns were analyzed, excluding Ceinozoic strata. All available data were taken into consideration: petrophysical properties of rocks, lithological and petrographic descriptions of drill cores and cuttings, and geophysical data (including Average Velocities Logs). Moreover, results of hydrogeological testing in analyzed wells were incorporated. Basic element of interpretation was the construction of lithological profile based upon the well-log data. Analyses were run for single wells. Parameters used in the interpretation were calibrated with the results of laboratory measurements. Basic source data for porosity interpretation originated from Gamma and Neutron Logs supported by well diameter logs. These are the only well-logs which enable true porosity calculations for wells drilled in the Polish Lowlands. The obtained true porosity was then recalculated into effective porosity using statistical parameters determined for given lithotypes. Analysis of criteria applied for identification of groundwater horizons and seals indicate the complex influence of various parameters on final result. Basic petrophysical parameters: effective porosity and permeability, which were the crucial parameters, reveal high variability within the particular lithotypes. Additional complications were caused by fracturing of rocks, which might increase reservoir properties. Fracturing may become a dominating factor influencing the reservoir properties of the Middle Triassic, Cambrian, Devonian and Carboniferous aquifers. Numerous analyses enabled identification of potential

The most prospective areas of use of thermal waters for heating purposes in the Polish Lowlands 29 groundwater horizons with the complicated criterion based upon both the lithology and the porosity. Out of 84 defined in an interpretation system lithotypes, four lithotypes were selected as potentially most effective groundwater horizons in the Polish Lowlands: sandstones, limestones, dolomites and gaizes. Additionally, all these lithotypes must show at least 5% true porosity. Both the analyzed porosity types reveal strong linear correlation. Thus, the linear correction formula for true porosity was accepted for interpretation procedures. Relative error of porosity determination increases with the decreasing true porosity. Similar relationships were found for limestone, dolomite and gaize lithotypes. METHODOLOGY OF REGIONAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF PORE VOLUME SPACE AND CAPACITY FOR THERMAL WATER STORAGE IN THE MAIN AQUIFERS OF THE POLISH LOWLANDS A separate interpretation problem was quantitative evaluation of well-log parameters: cumulative thickness of groundwater horizons and porosity of reservoir rocks in particular lithostratigraphic units of the Polish Lowlands. Results of well- -log data interpretation for all wells are contained in the Access database. Densities of measurements in particular geothermal aquifers were different. Most wells document the reservoir parameters (effective porosity) of the Upper Jurassic aquifer (168 wells). In order to determine reservoir properties and to calculate geothermal resources accumulated in selected geothermal aquifers in the Polish Lowlands, effective porosity was estimated, according to the following formula: (m w p e) p e [-] [1] m w where: p e weighted mean effective porosity of reservoir rocks in the column [%]; p e effective porosity of single groundwater horizon [%]; m w thickness of particular groundwater horizon [m]. For calculations of weighted mean effective porosity all identified groundwater horizons were taken, i.e. those which effective porosity was above zero. Analysis of averaged effective porosities (Fig. 2) indicates that best reservoir properties occur in Lower Cretaceous (21.8%) and Lower Jurassic (18.9%) aquifers. The Paleozoic aquifers: Cambrian, Devonian and Carboniferous, reveal apparently lower averaged values of effective porosity. However, these formations may locally show favourable reservoir properties (high discharges) due to fracturing. Analysis of interpretation results of well-log geophysics provided essential information leading to quantitative evaluation of thicknesses of groundwater horizons (including the cumulative thickness) within the particular formations. For calculations of percentages of groundwater horizons only those datasets were considered which documented horizons in the full lithostratigraphic column (i.e. which penetrated the full thicknesses of given lithostratigraphic units). Fig. 2. Averaged values of effective porosity in reservoir layers in the Polish Lowlands RESULTS OF GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES CALCULATION The calculations made with regard to the classification of resources, in accordance with the McKelvey s diagram, assume that the total accessible geothermal resources accumulated in the rock formations down to 3 km depth or down to the top surface of the crystalline basement amount to 7.753 10 22 J, which is an equivalent of 1.85 10 12 TOE 2. Considering the extent of the Mesozoic and Paleozoic geothermal aquifers in the Polish Lowlands, that expresses also the area of calculation (rounded up to 1 thousand km 2 ), they can be arranged in the following order: Lower Triassic (229 thousand km 2 73% of the territory of Poland), Middle Jurassic (205 thousand km 2 66%), Upper Jurassic (198 thousand km 2 63%), Upper Triassic (178 thousand km 2 57%), Lower Jurassic (160 thousand km 2 51%) and Lower Cretaceous (128 thousand km 2 41%). The largest calculation area among all the Paleozoic geothermal aquifers 2 TOE unit of energy representing that amount of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil, approximately 41.87 GJ

30 Marek Hajto, Wojciech Górecki Fig. 3. Static resources of thermal water within particular geothermal aquifers of Mesozoic age in the Polish Lowlands is occupied by the Lower Permian aquifer: about 102 thousand km 2, which constitutes 37% of total area of the Polish Lowlands and 33% of the whole territory of Poland. The principal resources of thermal waters in the Polish Lowlands are accumulated in the Mesozoic groundwater horizons. Thermal waters occur first of all in the Lower Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous formations but significant resources of geothermal energy may be found also in the Upper Jurassic, Middle Jurassic, Upper Triassic and Lower Triassic formations. Total static geothermal resources which express the amounts of free (gravitational) thermal water hosted in pores, fractures or caverns expressed in cubic metres or kilometres of water, recalculated after taking the water temperature into the energy units Joules, accumulated in thermal waters of the Polish Lowlands sedimentary formations are estimated at 1.45 10 22 J, which is an equivalent of 3.47 10 11 TOE. The largest static geothermal resources are accumulated in the Lower Jurassic aquifer and were estimated at about 6,320 km 3 of water with temperature ranging from 20 up to 120 C (Fig. 3). Energy accumulated in waters of the Lower Jurassic aquifer was calculated to be 2.99 10 21 J (7.14 10 10 TOE). Considering the distribution of static resources per unit area, the best parameters among the Mesozoic aquifers are revealed by the Lower Jurassic aquifer 1.86 10 16 J of energy per1km 2. Mean unit static resources for the Mesozoic (from the Lower Triassic to the Lower Cretaceous, excluding the Middle Triassic) aquifer are equal to 9.41 10 15 J/km 2 (Hajto, 2006). The amount of static-recoverable resources gives information on the fraction of geological (static) resources that can be theoretically recovered under specified technical parameters of exploitation and utilization of the geothermal medium, i.e at given cooling temperature and with given exploitation method (Gringarten, Sauty, 1975; Gringarten, 1979). The value of Ro 3 index depends on an exploitation method (single- or double-well system) and on relationships between the reservoir temperature, injection temperature (in double well system) and mean annual temperature at the Earth s surface. For the calculations it was assumed that waters are exploited by a double-well system and the injection temperature does not exceed 25 C. Averaged values of the recovery index calculated for all aquifers of the Polish Lowlands are ranging from 12.8% for the Upper Jurassic to 26.7% for the Lower Permian aquifer. Average Ro value calculated for all nine geothermal aquifers of the Polish Lowlands are estimated at 19.9% (Hajto, 2006). These results demonstrate that under geological and temperature conditions dominating in the Polish Lowlands it will be possible to recover less than 20% of geological resources of accumulated geothermal energy. Total static- -recoverable geothermal resources are equal to 2.9 10 21 J. The largest geothermal resources which are possible to be produced are accumulated in the Lower Triassic aquifer and are estimated at 6.13 10 20 J (1.46 10 10 TOE) (op. cit.). Additional estimation of energy accumulated in particular temperature classes of thermal waters enables a preliminary evaluation of the main directions of thermal water utilization. Using the methodology of factor evaluation of the heat recovery economic effectiveness (the power factor) made it possible to assess the geothermal energy utilization profitability at the regional scale and to indicate prospective areas within particular aquifers, but for this purpose the appropriate market of heat consumers for a geothermal plant construction should be specified. PROSPECTIVE AREAS OF USE OF THERMAL WATERS FOR HEATING PURPOSES The area of potential locations of new geothermal projects corresponds with the area revealing the most favourable geological and hydrogeological conditions within the main aquifers in the Polish Lowlands (Fig. 1). As regards the amount of accumulated energy, the most interesting and promising areas occur in the Warsaw, Mogilno ódÿ (in the central part of Poland) and Szczecin (in the northwestern part of the Polish Lowlands) troughs. Utilization of thermal waters for heating purposes in particular voivodships and towns of central Poland should, first of all, be based on the resources of the Lower Jurassic aquifer. Possibilities of geothermal energy utilization in remaining areas are rather low and related to limited areas. 3 Ro recovery index, which express the fraction of static resources that could be exploited with the given exploitation system

The most prospective areas of use of thermal waters for heating purposes in the Polish Lowlands 31 Acknowledgements. The Atlases were elaborated with application of digital processing of geological data and digital mapping. All calculations were run with the use of the OpenWorks integrated geological data processing system developed by Landmark Graphics Co. REFERENCES GÓRECKI W. (ed.), 2006a Atlas of geothermal resources in the Polish Lowlands Mesozoic formations. AGH, Kraków [in Polish]. GÓRECKI W. (ed.), 2006b Atlas of geothermal resources in the Polish Lowlands Palaeozoik formations. AGH, Kraków [in Polish]. GRINGARTEN A.C., SAUTY J.P., 1975 A Theoretical Study of Heat Extraction from Aquifer with Uniform Regional Flow. J. Geophys. Res., 80, 35: 4956 4962. GRINGARTEN A.C., 1979 Reservoir Lifetime and heat Recovery Factor in Geothermal, Aquifers used for Urban Heating. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 117, 1/2: 295 308. HAJTO M., 2006 Calculation results of geothermal resources in the Polish Lowlands. In: Atlas of geothermal resources in the Polish Lowlands Mesozoic formations (ed. W. Górecki): 192 197. AGH, Kraków [in Polish]. KÊPIÑSKA B., 2010 Geothermal energy country update report from Poland, 2005 2009. Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress, Bali Indonesia.