Evaluation of Engineering Properties of Rock Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity and Uniaxial Compressive Strength

Similar documents
The evaluation of rock brittleness concept on rotary blast hole drills

A Laboratory Investigation of Acoustic Emissions Associated with the Brittle Fracture of Rock Under Dry and Wet Conditions

RELATION BETWEEN UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, POINT LOAD INDEX AND SONIC WAVE VELOCITY FOR DOLERITE

Shear-wave propagation in rocks and other lossy media: An experimental study

Evaluation of the relationships between Schmidt rebound number and strength of rocks

Compressive strength and tensile strength of rocks at sub-zero temperature

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 10, October-2017 ISSN

Application of Fractals in the Acoustic Emission Study of Micro-cracking and Fracture Development in Brittle Rock

PREDICTION OF THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF GRANITES BY ULTRASONIC PULSE VELOCITY AND SCHMIDT HAMMER HARDNESS. Introduction

Evaluation of the Relationships Between P-Wave Velocity (Vp) and Joint Density (J )

Rock Material. Chapter 3 ROCK MATERIAL HOMOGENEITY AND INHOMOGENEITY CLASSIFICATION OF ROCK MATERIAL

Correlation between Blast Efficiency and Uniaxial Compressive Strength

STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF ROCKS AND ROCK MASSES 4. FAILURE CRITERIA FOR INTACT ROCKS AND ROCK MASSES

Influence of rock mass properties on TBM penetration rate in Karaj-Tehran water conveyance tunnel

Estimation of Specific Energy in Rock Indentation Test

ASSESSMENT OF POWDER FACTOR IN SURFACE BENCH BLASTING USING SCHMIDT REBOUND NUMBER OF ROCK MASS

V.C. KELESSIDIS Technical University of Crete Mineral Resources Engineering AMIREG 2009 Athens, September 7-9, 2009

The effect of discontinuities on strength of rock samples

Module 5: Failure Criteria of Rock and Rock masses. Contents Hydrostatic compression Deviatoric compression

REGRESSION MODELING FOR STRENGTH AND TOUGHNESS EVALUATION OF HYBRID FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE

CHAPTER 6 CONCLUDING REMARKS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Estimation of Sound Level Produced During Drilling of Igneous Rock Samples Using a Portable Drill Set-up

Correlation Between P-wave Velocity and Strength Index for Shale to Predict Uniaxial Compressive Strength Value

Experimental Assessment of Rock Cutting Characteristics by Strength-Driven Mechanism. H Munoz, A Taheri & E Chanda

Rock Mechanics Laboratory Tests for Petroleum Applications. Rob Marsden Reservoir Geomechanics Advisor Gatwick

Double punch test for tensile strength of concrete, Sept (70-18) PB224770/AS (NTIS)

Innovative Blast Free Mining Methods for Aggregate Quarries " Ramesh Bhatawdekar, Edy Tonnizam Mohamad, Firdaus Azlan Department of Geoteknik and Tran

Failure and Failure Theories for Anisotropic Rocks

Temperature Dependent Mechanical Properties of Reservoir s Overburden Rocks During SAGD Process

Impulsive loading on reinforced concrete slabs - blast loading function N. Duranovic & A.J. Watson Department of Civil and Structural Engineering,

Predicting Los Angeles abrasion loss of rock aggregates from crushability index

Measurement of acousto-elastic effect by using surface acoustic wave

Numerical modeling of standard rock mechanics laboratory tests using a finite/discrete element approach

Behaviour of Blast-Induced Damaged Zone Around Underground Excavations in Hard Rock Mass Problem statement Objectives

Investigation of the Effect of Drill Bit Rotation Speed on Sustainable Drilling

Brittleness analysis study of shale by analyzing rock properties

PHYSICO-MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF ROCKS LECTURE 2. Contents

Correlation of Mechanical Properties of Some Rocks in South-Eastern Nigeria

Dynamic Rock Failures Due to High Stress at Shallow Depth

Jiang XU, Yixin LIU, and Shoujian PENG

Standard Test Method for Determination of the Point Load Strength Index of Rock 1

Supplementary Uniaxial Compressive Strength Testing of DGR-3 and DGR-4 Core

CORRELATION BETWEEN UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AND INDIRECT TENSILE STRENGTH FOR JOINTED ROCKS

Technical Note Burst Energy Release Index. S. P. Singh. Introduction

NORMAL STRESS. The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts.

The Mine Geostress Testing Methods and Design

LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF STIFFNESS OF SOFT CLAY USING BENDER ELEMENTS

Introduction and Background

Nondestructive and Destructive Testing of Reinforced Polymeric Materials

The Relationship between the Applied Torque and Stresses in Post-Tension Structures

Outline. Tensile-Test Specimen and Machine. Stress-Strain Curve. Review of Mechanical Properties. Mechanical Behaviour

Pillar strength estimates for foliated and inclined pillars in schistose material

Institute de Physique du Globe, Paris, France. Summary

Three-Dimensional Failure Criteria Based on the Hoek Brown Criterion

AVOIDING FRACTURE INSTABILITY IN WEDGE SPLITTING TESTS BY MEANS OF NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS

Simulation of the cutting action of a single PDC cutter using DEM

Effect of various stress ratio parameters on cold upset forging of irregular shaped billets using white grease as lubricant

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND ROCK ENGINEERING

Effect of Displacement Loading Rate on Mechanical Properties of Sandstone

USING NON-DESTRUCTIVE METHODS TO OBTAIN THE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE SAMPLES

NUMERICAL MODELLING OF THE WEDGE SPLITTING TEST IN ROCK SPECIMENS, USING FRACTURE-BASED ZERO-THICKNESS INTERFACE ELEMENTS

C. R. McKee and M. E. Hanson Lawrence Livermore Laboratory University of California Livermore, California 94550

CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY

20. Rheology & Linear Elasticity

Effects of Confining Stress on the Post-Peak Behaviour and Fracture Angle of Fauske Marble and Iddefjord Granite

Ultrasonic pulse-broadening and attenuation in volcanic rock - A case study

4) Ash, R.L., Blasting characteristics of large diameter boreholes. 6 th Annual Drilling and Blasting Technology, Houstan, 1977.

Experimental study of mechanical and thermal damage in crystalline hard rock

NDE of wood-based composites with longitudinal stress waves

DAMAGE CHARACTERIZATION OF COAL MEASURE ROCKS UNDER UNIAXIAL COMPRESSION

A STUDY ON VARIATION IN ENGINEERING CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME GRANITIC ROCKS

Geology 229 Engineering Geology. Lecture 5. Engineering Properties of Rocks (West, Ch. 6)

THE INFLUENCE OF ROOF BOLTS LOCATION ON ITS INTERACTION WITH THE ROCK MASS.

Mechanical properties of very thin cover slip glass disk

Introduction to Engineering Materials ENGR2000. Dr. Coates

ScienceDirect. Study of acoustic emission in a compression test of andesite rock

Non-Destructive Assessment of Residual Strength of Thermally Damaged Concrete Made with Different Aggregate Types

Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete Based on Analysis of Velocity Dispersion of Laser Ultrasonics

Lap splice length and details of column longitudinal reinforcement at plastic hinge region

Experimentally Calibrating Cohesive Zone Models for Structural Automotive Adhesives

ELECIRONIC SPECKLE PATTERN INTERFEROMETRY IN CHARACTERIZING

Rock fragmentation mechanisms and an experimental study of drilling tools during high-frequency harmonic vibration

Critical Borehole Orientations Rock Mechanics Aspects

TBM "Boreability" in Hard Rock

PERMITTIVITY VARIATIONS ON MARBLE BEAMS SUBJECTED TO VARIOUS LOADING LEVELS

Correlation Between Point Load Index And Very Low Uniaxial Compressive Strength Of Some Iraqi Rocks

Geomechanical Characterization of a Montney Equivalent Outcrop

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

Fracture pattern of anisotropic rock by drilling or cutting using the PFC

ATTEMPT TO MEASURE VELOCITY AT LOW FREQUENCY BY MODIFIED TRI-AXIAL DESTRUCTIVE INSTRUMENT

DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMATIC CONTROL OF MULTI-STAGE TRIAXIAL TESTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MISKOLC

Effect of acidic water on physico-mechanical behaviour of rock

EFFECT OF PRESSURE ON ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF CHITOSAN Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

STRESS DROP AS A RESULT OF SPLITTING, BRITTLE AND TRANSITIONAL FAULTING OF ROCK SAMPLES IN UNIAXIAL AND TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TESTS

[Nij[]D~~~~[L ~~ (1JJ[fd~~ a CID[}{]W D~

Effect of intermediate principal stresses on compressive strength of Phra Wihan sandstone

New Generation Rotary Drill Bits: Klaw Bit Performance Analysis and Compared with Tricone Bit

This is the accepted version of a paper presented at 2014 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC).

MECE 3321 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS CHAPTER 3

Behavior of an impacted reinforced concrete slab: percussion and punching analysis

Transcription:

Indian Society for Non-Destructive Testing Hyderabad Chapter Proc. National Seminar on Non-Destructive Evaluation Dec. 7-9, 26, Hyderabad Evaluation of Engineering Properties of Rock Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity and Uniaxial Compressive Strength K.B. Chary, L.P. Sarma, K.J. Prasanna Lakshmi, N.A. Vijayakumar, V. Naga Lakshmi and M.V.M.S. Rao National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad-5 7 A strong laboratory database of mechanical and engineering properties of rocks is very useful for site characterization and mining engineering applications. Owing to the discontinuous and variable nature of rock masses, it is difficult for rock engineers to directly obtain the specific design parameters of interest. As an alternative, they use empirical or analytical relationships among various physical and mechanical strength properties of materials to estimate the required engineering properties of rocks and other brittle materials of interest. We have found recently that the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) can also be used to estimate the engineering properties of rocks. We have carried out Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) measurements and Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) tests on a large number of sandstone samples of coal mining industry in our laboratory. The engineering properties such as brittleness, hardness, fracture toughness and drillability index of rocks have been obtained. It is found that there is a fairly good correlation between UPV & UCS and UPV & the above mentioned engineering properties of sandstones. A few case studies are presented and discussed in this paper. Keywords: UPV, UCS, Sandstone 1. Introduction A strong laboratory database of mechanical and engineering properties of rocks is very useful for site characterization and mining engineering applications. Owing to the discontinuous and variable nature of rock masses, it is difficult for rock engineers to directly obtain the specific design parameters of interest. As an alternative, they use empirical or theoretical correlations among various physical and mechanical properties of rocks to estimate the required engineering properties of rocks [1, 2]. We have found that the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) data can be used along with the strength data to estimate the engineering properties of rocks. The mechanical (Uniaxial Compressive Strength and Tensile Strength) and engineering properties can be measured through a destructive test whereas the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) is measured by a non-destructive test. The Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) and tensile strength data can be used to calculate brittleness, which is one of the important engineering properties of rock [3]. Furthermore, the brittleness is empirically related to the other engineering properties such as hardness, fracture toughness and drillability index [4,5]. We have carried out UPV measurements and UCS tests on a large number of sandstone samples of coal mining industries namely, Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited (NLC) and Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) of South India in our laboratory [6]. It is found that there is a fairly good correlation between UPV and UCS of coal and lignite bearing sandstons. The engineering NDE-26

K.B. Chary et al. properties such as brittleness, hardness, fracture toughness and drillability index of rocks can be calculated using the UCS data and the empirical relationships [4,5]. Therefore, the UCS data have been made use off for estimating the above mentioned engineering properties of sandstones of SCCL and NLC. Also, we have examined if there is any correlation between UPV and the engineering properties of the NLC and SCCL sandstones. The results are found to be very encouraging. These are presented and discussed in this paper. 2. Experimental Procedure The samples for the present study were collected from the mines of Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited (NLC) and Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) of South India. The rock samples collected from the lignite mine of NLC are clayey, mottled clayey sandstones, hard and very hard sandstones. Whereas samples of the SCCL coal mine are medium-strong sandstones associated with shaly coals. The samples used for the studies are AX-size (3 mm dia. and 6 mm long) cylindrical specimens. The two ends of each rock cylinder were ground and lapped parallel to attain an accuracy of ±.2 mm and both the ends were polished. Also, the cylindrical sides are made straight active an accuracy of ±.3 mm over the full length of each specimen. 2.1 Density The density of each core sample was measured after the removal of moisture from it. The moisture was removed by placing the samples in an electric oven at ~ 8 C for one hour and they were dried at room conditions. The density data of dry samples was obtained from the measurements of bulk volume and mass of each core using the following formula. 3 Mass of sample ρ ( g / cm ) = (1) Volume of sample 2.2 Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) The Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) has been determined by subjecting each rock sample to incremental loading at a nearly constant rate with the help of a Universal Testing Machine (UTM) of 1 ton capacity. The UCS of the test sample is calculated by the following formula. Failure load UCS ( MPa) = Cross sectional area of the sample 2.3 Velocity (2) Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) measurements of compressional waves have been carried out using a high-energy pulserreceiver on the driving side and a 2-channel digital storage oscilloscope on the receiving side for the measurement of travel time. We determined the P-wave velocity (V P ) using the time-of-flight measurement technique at 1 MHz frequency as described in detail elsewhere [7,8]. The velocity is computed using the following formula. Length of the sample V P ( m / sec) = (3) Travel time 3. Results and Discussion The sandstone samples of the present study were obtained from two coal mines, namely Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited (NLC) and Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) of South India. The laboratory rock mechanics tests have been carried out on 3 samples from NLC and 5 samples from SCCL. The summary of data of density, P-wave velocity, UCS and engineering properties of the rock samples of both the mines are presented in Table 1. The density of NLC sandstones varies from 1.73 g/cc to 2.984 g/cc with an 38 NDE-26

Evaluation of Engineering Properties of Rock average value of 2.365 g/cc, whereas the density of SCCL samples ranges from 2.8 g/cc to 2.319 g/cc with an average value of 2.26 g/cc (Table 1). The P-wave velocity ranges from 288 m/sec to 57 m/sec with an average value of 4669 m/sec for NLC samples while it ranges from 2833 m /sec to 3831 m/sec with an average value of 3345 m/sec for SCCL samples (Table 1). The UCS of NLC sandstone ranges from 1.92 MPa to 164.1 MPa with an average value of 8.72 MPa whereas the UCS of SCCL sandstone varies from 15. MPa to 37.51 MPa with an average value of 24.6 MPa. The density, P-wave velocity and UCS data of sandstone samples of SCCL are less than those of sandstone samples of NLC. The relationship between UCS and velocity data of NLC and SCCL sandstones is plotted. The UCS increases with increase in the P- wave velocity in both the NLC (Fig. 1a) and SCCL (Fig. 1b) sandstone samples. The relationship between them has been analyzed using the method of least-square regression. We got useful empirical linear relationships between UCS and P-wave velocity with good correlation coefficient. The empirical relation between UCS and P- wave velocity is given below. UCS =.1564*V P - 692.41; R 2 =.818 (NLC) (4) UCS =.144*V P - 24.856; R 2 =.599 (SCCL) (5) 3.1 Estimation of Engineering Properties The engineering properties such as brittleness (B), hardness (Schmidt s Rebound Number, RN), fracture toughness (FT) and drillability index (DI) are useful for efficient planning of mining, quarrying operations and other applications of rock engineering. The brittleness is the property of materials that rupture or fracture with little or no plastic flow. There is a strong correlation between UCS and tensile strength [2] and among UCS, tensile strength and brittleness [3]. Hence, we made use off UCS data for calculating brittleness. Further, brittleness can be used for calculating the other engineering properties [4]. Hardness is the resistance to deformation of materials. Schmidt s Rebound Number (RN) is the one of the methods for determining the hardness of materials. It was originally developed for measuring the strength of hardness of concrete [9]. Fracture toughness is the ability of rock to resist fracturing and propagation of pre-existing cracks [1]. Drillability index is ratio of force to penetration rate. It is used for determine the bit type, average penetration rate and approximate bit life. The interrelationships among engineering properties, physical and mechanical properties have been reviewed by Zhang [2]. Some of the engineering properties (Index Properties) such as brittleness (B), Schmidt s Rebound Number (RN), fracture toughness (FT) and drillability index (DI) of sandstone samples of the NLC and SCCL have been estimated in the present study using UCS data and the empirical relationships published recently [4,5]. These empirical relationships are as follows. σ T = σ C /1 (6) B = (σ C *σ T )/2 (7) RN = 5.9528*ln(B 2 )+2.933 (8) FT =.11*(B 2 ).43 (9) DI =.6344*(B 2 ).6186 for conical bit (1) Where σ T = Tensile strength (MPa) σ C B = Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS, MPa) = Brittleness RN = Schmidt s Rebound Number NDE-26 381

K.B. Chary et al. FT = Fracture toughness (MPa m 1/2 ) DI = Drillability Index (kn/mm) The summary of engineering properties of NLC and SCCL sandstone samples calculated using above equations 7-1 are presented in Table 1. The engineering properties of NLC samples such as brittleness ranges from 5.96 to 1346.44 with an average value of 424.3, Schmidt s Rebound Number varies from 31.56 to 63.82 with an average value of 52.78, fracture toughness ranges from.24 MPa m 1/2 to 2.44 MPa m 1/2 with an average value of 1.3 MPa m 1/2 and drillability index varies from 1.91 kn/mm to 54.71 kn/mm with an average value of 23.76 kn/mm, while for SCCL samples the brittleness ranges from 11.25 to 7.35 with an average value of 31.69, hardness varies from 35.34 to 46.25 with an average value of.93, fracture toughness ranges from.31 MPa m 1/2 to.69 MPa m 1/2 with an average of.48 MPa m 1/2 and drillability index varies from 2.84 kn/mm to 8.81 kn/mm with an average value of 5.27 kn/mm (Table 1). 3.2 Empirical Relationships Between Engineering Properties and P-wave Velocity Since the engineering properties have been calculated using UCS data, and since there is a good correlation between UCS and P-wave velocity data (Fig. 1), we examined the relationships between P-wave velocity data and the engineering properties of the NLC and SCCL sandstone samples. Hence, we have plotted data of engineering properties such as brittleness (Fig. 2), hardness (Fig. 3), fracture toughness (Fig. 4) and drillability index (Fig. 5) against P- wave velocity data of NLC and SCCL sandstone samples. The results have been analyzed using least square regression method. It is found that the above mentioned engineering properties increase with increase in the P-wave velocity of NLC (Figs. 2a-5a) and SCCL (Figs.2b-5b) samples tested in the present study. The empirical relationships between the engineering properties and P-wave velocity are given below: Empirical relationship for NLC samples B= 1.821*V P - 4898.2; R 2 =.7487 (11) RN=.27*V P - 5.793; R 2 =.615 (12) FT=.14*V P - 5.843; R 2 =.6345 (13) DI=.361*V P - 156.18; R 2 =.6226 (14) Empirical relationships for SCCL samples B=.382*V P - 1.56; R 2 =.5413 (15) RN=.84*V P + 11.842; R 2 =.544 (16) FT=.3*V P -.4112; R 2 =.544 (17) DI=.4*V P - 8.7153; R 2 =.5183 (18) The results (Table 1) show that NLC sandstones are much stronger (Mean UCS = 8.72 MPa; Schmidt s Rebound Number = 52.78) than the sandstones of SCCL (mean UCS: 24.6 MPa; Schmidt s Rebound Number =.93). The associated properties, namely brittleness, fracture toughness and drillabilty index of the sandstones of NLC are also found to be higher than those of the sandstones of SCCL (Table 1). 4. Conclusions The Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) is an important mechanical property from which some of the engineering properties can be calculated. The determination of UCS (destructive test) is relatively difficult than the room temperature UPV measurements (Nondestructive test) in rock samples. Hence, the relationship between UCS and laboratory P- wave velocity data of sandstones has been analyzed and we found a good correlation between UCS and P-wave velocity data. 382 NDE-26

Evaluation of Engineering Properties of Rock Uniaxial compressive strength(mpa) 2 18 16 1 12 1 8 6 2 y =.1564x - 692.41 R 2 =.818 42 4 46 48 5 52 5 56 Schmidt's Rebound Number 7 65 6 55 5 45 y =.27x - 5.793 R 2 =.615 42 4 46 48 5 52 5 56 Uniaxial compressive strength (MPa) 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 y =.144x - 24.856 R 2 =.599 2 26 28 3 32 3 36 38 Schmidt's Rebound Number 5 45 35 3 y =.84x + 11.842 R 2 =.544 25 28 3 32 3 36 38 Fig.1: Plots showing the uniaxial compressive strength-p-wave velocity relationship of the samples of NLC sandstones and SCCL sandstones Fig.3: Plots showing the Schmidt s Rebound Number-P-wave velocity relationship of the samples of NLC sandstones and SCCL sandstones Brittleness Brittleness 1 9 8 7 6 5 3 2 1 y = 1.821x - 4898.2 R 2 =.7487 42 4 46 48 5 52 5 56 6 5 3 2 1 y =.382x - 1.56 R 2 =.5413 28 3 32 3 36 38 Fig.2: Plots showing the brittleness- P-wave velocity relationship of the samples of NLC sandstones and SCCL sandstones Fracture toughness ( MPa m 1/2 ) Fracture toughness ( MPa m 1/2 ) 3. 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5 y =.14x - 5.843 R 2 =.6345. 42 4 46 48 5 52 5 56 1..8.6.4.2 y =.3x -.4112 R 2 =.544. 28 3 32 3 36 38 Fig.4: Plots showing the fracture toughness- P-wave velocity relationship of the samples of NLC sandstones and SCCL sandstones NDE-26 383

K.B. Chary et al. Drillability Index (kn/mm) Drillability index (kn/mm) 6 5 3 2 1 y =.361x - 156.18 R 2 =.6226 42 4 46 48 5 52 5 56 1 8 6 4 2 y =.4x - 8.7153 R 2 =.5183 28 3 32 3 36 38 Fig.5: Plots showing the fracture toughness- P-wave velocity relationship of the samples of NLC sandstones and SCCL sandstones The density, P-wave velocity and UCS data of the sandstone samples of lignite mines (NLC) are found to be higher than those of the sandstones of coal mines (SCCL). The engineering properties of NLC sandstones are higher than those of SCCL sandstones. The engineering properties of rock are difficult to obtain directly. Alternatively the empirical relationships can be used to estimate the engineering properties of rock. We got a good relationship between the engineering properties and P-wave velocity data of sandstones. 5. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Dr. S.K. Verma for providing us the sandstone samples from NLC. Our thanks are also due to Dr. V.P. Dimri, Director, NGRI for showing keen interest in this work and encouraging us to publish this. 6. References 1. Szlavin J., Relationships between some physical properties of rock determined by laboratory tests, Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 11, 57-66, 1974. 2. Zhang L, Engineering Properties of Rocks, Vol. 4, 1-29, Elsevier Publ., Amsterdam, 25. 3. Hucka V. and Das B., Brittleness determination of rocks by different methods, Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech Abstr., 11, 389-392, 1974. 4. Altindag R., The evaluation of rock brittleness concept on rotary blast hole drills, J. South African Inst. Min. Metallurgy, 61-66, 22. 5. Kahraman S. and Altindag R., A brittleness index to estimate fracture toughness, Int. J. Rock. Mech. & Min. Sci., 41, 343-348, 24. 6. Prasanna Lakshmi K.J., Chary K.B., Vijay Kumar N.A., Rao M.V.M.S. and S.K. Verma, Physical, Mechanical and Engineering properties of some of the sandstone samples of Mine-I, NLC, Tamilnadu, Tech. Report. No: NGRI-25- LITHOS-517, 31, 25. 7. Rao M.V.M.S., Sarma L.P., and Prasanna Lakshmi K.J., Ultrasonic pulse broadening and attenuation in volcanic rock- A case study, Ind. J. Pure. & Appl. Phys.,, 396-1, 22. 8. Rao M.V.M.S. and Prasanna Lakshmi K.J., Shear wave propagation in rocks and other lossy media: An experimental study, Curr. Sci., 85(8), 1221-1225, 23. 9. Schmidt, E., A non destructive concrete tester, Concrete, 59(8), 34-35, 1951. 1. Kahraman S., Balci, C.,Yazici, S. and Bilgin, N., Prediction of the penetration rate of rotary blast hole drills using a new drillability index, Int. J. rock Mech.and Min. Sc., 37, 729-743, 2. 384 NDE-26

Evaluation of Engineering Properties of Rock Table 1: Summary of results of density, P-wave velocity, Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) measurements and engineering properties of NLC and SCCL sandstones Density V P g/cc m/sec Sandstones from Lignite mines (NLC) Number of samples: 3 UCS MPa B RN FT MPa m 1/2 DI kn/mm Range Average 1.73-2.984 288-57 1.92-164.1 5.96-1346.44 31.56-63.82.24-2.44 1.91-54.71 (2.365) (4669) (8.72) (424.3) (52.78) (1.3) (23.76) Sandstones from Coal mines (SCCL) Number of samples: 5 Range 2.8-2.319 2833-3831 15.-37.51 11.25-7.35 35.34-46.25.31-.69 2.84-8.81 Average (2.26) (3345) (24.6) (31.69) (.93) (.48) (5.27) V P : P-wave velocity; UCS : Uniaxial compressive strength; B : Brittleness; RN : Schmidt s Rebound Number; FT : Fracture Toughness; DI : Drillability Index; NDE-26 385