Positive definite functions, completely monotone functions, the Bernstein-Widder theorem, and Schoenberg s theorem

Similar documents
Integral operators. Jordan Bell Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto. April 22, X F x(y)dµ(y) x N c 1 0 x N 1

The Lindeberg central limit theorem

The Kolmogorov extension theorem

Gaussian Hilbert spaces

Jointly measurable and progressively measurable stochastic processes

Stone-Čech compactification of Tychonoff spaces

Bernstein s inequality and Nikolsky s inequality for R d

Semicontinuous functions and convexity

The Kolmogorov continuity theorem, Hölder continuity, and the Kolmogorov-Chentsov theorem

HILBERT SPACES AND THE RADON-NIKODYM THEOREM. where the bar in the first equation denotes complex conjugation. In either case, for any x V define

Recall that if X is a compact metric space, C(X), the space of continuous (real-valued) functions on X, is a Banach space with the norm

5 Measure theory II. (or. lim. Prove the proposition. 5. For fixed F A and φ M define the restriction of φ on F by writing.

Compact operators on Banach spaces

6.2 Fubini s Theorem. (µ ν)(c) = f C (x) dµ(x). (6.2) Proof. Note that (X Y, A B, µ ν) must be σ-finite as well, so that.

FUNDAMENTALS OF REAL ANALYSIS by. IV.1. Differentiation of Monotonic Functions

MATH MEASURE THEORY AND FOURIER ANALYSIS. Contents

(1) Consider the space S consisting of all continuous real-valued functions on the closed interval [0, 1]. For f, g S, define

Real Analysis Problems

1 Topology Definition of a topology Basis (Base) of a topology The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3

Part II Probability and Measure

Aliprantis, Border: Infinite-dimensional Analysis A Hitchhiker s Guide

REAL AND COMPLEX ANALYSIS

Analysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall 2008

Tools from Lebesgue integration

3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?

Integral Jensen inequality

Real Analysis Notes. Thomas Goller

Math 172 Problem Set 5 Solutions

5 Compact linear operators

MATH 650. THE RADON-NIKODYM THEOREM

Real Analysis, 2nd Edition, G.B.Folland Elements of Functional Analysis

PROBLEMS. (b) (Polarization Identity) Show that in any inner product space

Introduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference Lecture 22: Preliminaries for Semiparametric Inference

Chapter 6. Integration. 1. Integrals of Nonnegative Functions. a j µ(e j ) (ca j )µ(e j ) = c X. and ψ =

1 Functional Analysis

Five Mini-Courses on Analysis

Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences. Supergradients. KC Border Fall 2001 v ::15.45

CHAPTER 6. Differentiation

Continuous Functions on Metric Spaces

Review of Multi-Calculus (Study Guide for Spivak s CHAPTER ONE TO THREE)

Solutions: Problem Set 4 Math 201B, Winter 2007

Projection-valued measures and spectral integrals

Solutions to Tutorial 11 (Week 12)

Reminder Notes for the Course on Measures on Topological Spaces

4 Hilbert spaces. The proof of the Hilbert basis theorem is not mathematics, it is theology. Camille Jordan

08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms

Inner Product Spaces An inner product on a complex linear space X is a function x y from X X C such that. (1) (2) (3) x x > 0 for x 0.

ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS. 1 cos(nx) lim. n 2 x 2. g n (x) = 1 cos(nx) n 2 x 2. x 2.

3. (a) What is a simple function? What is an integrable function? How is f dµ defined? Define it first

Finite-dimensional spaces. C n is the space of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) of complex numbers. It is a Hilbert space with the inner product

Functional Analysis HW #5

MAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 1. Sets Functions Countability Axiom of choice Equivalence relations 9

Kernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels

Recall that any inner product space V has an associated norm defined by

THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515

The Hilbert transform

MATH 202B - Problem Set 5

HW #1 SOLUTIONS. g(x) sin 1 x

THE STONE-WEIERSTRASS THEOREM AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO L 2 SPACES

Chapter 3: Baire category and open mapping theorems

Analysis Finite and Infinite Sets The Real Numbers The Cantor Set

MAT 257, Handout 13: December 5-7, 2011.

CHEBYSHEV INEQUALITIES AND SELF-DUAL CONES

Notes on Integrable Functions and the Riesz Representation Theorem Math 8445, Winter 06, Professor J. Segert. f(x) = f + (x) + f (x).

DIFFERENTIAL CRITERIA FOR POSITIVE DEFINITENESS

Lebesgue Measure on R n

Positive Definite Functions on Hilbert Space

SOLUTIONS TO SOME PROBLEMS

Zygmund s Fourier restriction theorem and Bernstein s inequality

Lebesgue Measure on R n

Defining the Integral

Chapter 8 Integral Operators

Differentiation of Measures and Functions

Homework 11. Solutions

Contents: 1. Minimization. 2. The theorem of Lions-Stampacchia for variational inequalities. 3. Γ -Convergence. 4. Duality mapping.

Analysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall F(x) = 1 x. f(t)dt. t 1 2. tf 2 (t)dt. and g(t, x) = 2 t. 2 t

Bounded and continuous functions on a locally compact Hausdorff space and dual spaces

Hausdorff measure. Jordan Bell Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto. October 29, 2014

1 Inner Product Space

Fall f(x)g(x) dx. The starting place for the theory of Fourier series is that the family of functions {e inx } n= is orthonormal, that is

1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 and W2016

+ 2x sin x. f(b i ) f(a i ) < ɛ. i=1. i=1

2 (Bonus). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?

Spring 2014 Advanced Probability Overview. Lecture Notes Set 1: Course Overview, σ-fields, and Measures

Real Analysis Chapter 3 Solutions Jonathan Conder. ν(f n ) = lim

MATH 131A: REAL ANALYSIS (BIG IDEAS)

Lebesgue-Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Compendium and Solutions to exercises TMA4225 Foundation of analysis

THE INVERSE FUNCTION THEOREM

A List of Problems in Real Analysis

Brownian Motion and Conditional Probability

About Grupo the Mathematical de Investigación Foundation of Quantum Mechanics

g 2 (x) (1/3)M 1 = (1/3)(2/3)M.

Real Analysis, 2nd Edition, G.B.Folland Signed Measures and Differentiation

Elements of Positive Definite Kernel and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space

Some basic elements of Probability Theory

Chapter 4. The dominated convergence theorem and applications

LEBESGUE MEASURE AND L2 SPACE. Contents 1. Measure Spaces 1 2. Lebesgue Integration 2 3. L 2 Space 4 Acknowledgments 9 References 9

The Borel-Cantelli Group

Lebesgue Integration on R n

Transcription:

Positive definite functions, completely monotone functions, the Bernstein-Widder theorem, and Schoenberg s theorem Jordan Bell jordan.bell@gmail.com Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto June 6, 15 1 Linear operators For a comple Hilbert space H let L H) be the bounded linear operators H H. It is a fact that A L H) is self-adjoint if and only if Ah, h R for all h H. 1 For a bounded self-adjoint operator A it is a fact that A sup Ah, h. h 1 A L H) is called positive if it is self-adjoint and Ah, h, h H; because we have taken H to be a comple Hilbert space, for A to be positive it suffices that the inequality is satisfied. For A, B L C n ), we define their Hadamard product A B L H) by So, A B)e i Ae i, e j Be i, e j e j. j1 A B)e i, e j Ae i, e j Be i, e j. The Schur product theorem states that if A, B L C n ) are positive then their Hadamard product A B is positive. 3 1 John B. Conway, A Course in Functional Analysis, second ed., p. 33, Proposition.1. John B. Conway, A Course in Functional Analysis, second ed., p. 34, Proposition.13. 3 Ward Cheney and Will Light, A Course in Approimation Theory, p. 81, chapter 1. 1

Positive definite functions Let X be a real or comple linear space, let f : X C be a function, and for 1,..., n X, define F f;1,..., n L C n ) by F f;1,..., n e i f i j )e j, j1 where {e 1,..., e n } is the standard basis for C n. Thus for u n i1 u ie i C n, n n F f;1,..., n u, u f i j )e j, u k e k u i i1 j1 n u i i1 j1 i1 j1 f i j ) u i u j f i j ). e j, k1 u k e k k1 We call f positive definite if for all 1,..., n X, F f;1,..., n operator, i.e. for u C n, is a positive F f;1,..., n u, u. We call f strictly positive definite for all distinct 1,..., n X and nonzero u C n, F f;1,..., n u, u >. 3 Completely monotone functions A function f : [, ) R is called completely monotone if 1. f C[, ). f C, ) 3. 1) k f k) ) for k and, ) Because a completely monotone function is continuous, f) tends to f) as. Because a completely monotone function is nonincreasing and conve, f) has a limit, which we call f ), as. The Bernstein-Widder theorem states that a function f satisfying f) 1 is completely monotone if and only if it is the Laplace transform of a Borel probability measure on [, ). 4 4 Peter D. La, Functional Analysis, p. 138, chapter 14, Theorem 3; http://djalil.chafai.net/blog/13/3/3/ the-bernstein-theorem-on-completely-monotone-functions/

Theorem 1 Bernstein-Widder theorem). A function f : [, ) R satisfies f) 1 and is completely monotone if and only if there is a Borel probability measure µ on [, ) such that f) e t dµt), [, ). Proof. If f is the Laplace transform of some probability measure µ on B [, ), then using the dominated convergence theorem yields that f is continuous and by induction that f C, ). For k and for, ), f k) ) t) k e t dµt), as t k e t dµt) so 1) k f k) ). Hence f is completely monotone, and f) dµt) 1. If f satisfies f) 1 and is completely monotone, then for each k, the function 1) k f k) :, ) R is nonnegative and is nonincreasing, so for k 1 and t, ), using that 1) k f k) is nondecreasing and that 1) k 1 f k 1) is nonnegative, t 1) k f k) t) 1) k f k) u)du t t/ ) t 1)k f k 1) t) f k 1) t/) Doing induction, for any k 1, 1) k f k) t) t 1)k 1 f k 1) t/). k 1 j1 k 1 j1 Because f) f) as, t f k 1 j t j t ) ) t f k 1 t k kk 1)/ f ) f and because f) f ) as, ) ) t t f k 1 f k ) k t f t k 1 t k 1 ) t f ) f ) t k, t, 3, t. t k k )) )).

Hence for each k 1, and ft) o k t k ), t, 1) ft) o k t k ), t. ) Furthermore, for any, ), f k) t) f k) ) as t, so it is immediate that t ) k f k) t), t. 3) For and k 1, integrating by parts, using ) and 1) or 3) respectively as or >, f) f ) f t)dt t )f t) Hence for and n, Define + f t)t )dt f t)t )dt t ) f t) f t ) t) dt f t ) t) dt 1) k f k) t )k 1 t) dt. k 1)! f) f ) 1)n+1 n! For n 1, by change of variables, For t, define f) f ) 1)n+1 n! φ n y) 1 y/n) n 1 [,n] y). 1)n+1 n 1)! 1)n+1 n 1)! 1)n+1 n 1)! s n t) 1)n+1 n 1)! /n /n f n+1) t)t ) n dt. f n+1) nu)nu ) n ndu f n+1) nu)nu) n 1 ) n du nu nu) n φ n /u)f n+1) nu)du n/t) n φ n t)f n+1) n/t)t dt. 1/t 4 nu) n f n+1) nu)du,

where s n ), and for t < let s n t). s n is continuous and because f is completely monotone, s n is nondecreasing, so there is a unique positive measure σ n on B R such that 5 σna, b]) snb) sna), a b. On the other hand, s n is absolutely continuous, so σ n is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure λ 1, and for λ 1 -almost all t R, 6 dσ n dλ 1 t) s nt). Now for t >, by the fundamental theorem of calculus and the chain rule, and therefore s nt) 1)n+1 n 1)! n/t)n f n+1) n/t) t, f) f ) φ n t)s nt)dλ 1 t) φ n t) dσ n dλ 1 t)dλ 1 t) φ n t)dσ n t). The total variation of σ n is equal to the total variation of s n, and because s n is nondecreasing, which is σ n s nt) dt σ n 1)n+1 n 1)! s nt)dt s n ) s n ) s n ), nu) n f n+1) nu)du f) f ), showing that {σ n : n 1} is bounded for the total variation norm. We claim that {σ n : n 1} is tight: for each ɛ > there is a compact subset K ɛ of R such that σ n Kɛ c ) < ɛ for all n. Taking this for granted, Prokhorov s theorem 7 states that there is a subsequence σ kn of σ n that converges narrowly to some positive measure σ on B R. Finally, the sequence t φ n t) tends in C b [, )) to t e t, and it thus follows that 8 φ n t)dσ n t) e t dσt), 5 Charalambos D. Aliprantis and Kim C. Border, Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker s Guide, third ed., p. 393, Theorem 1.48. 6 H. L. Royden, Real Analysis, third ed., p. 33, Eercise 16. 7 V. I. Bogachev, Measure Theory, volume II, p., Theorem 8.6.. 8 cf. Charalambos D. Aliprantis and Kim C. Border, Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker s Guide, third ed., p. 511, Corollary 15.7. 5

so Let with which hence f) f ) e t dµt) µ σ + f )δ, f) e t dσt). e t dσt) + f ), e t dµt). Because f) 1, dµt) 1, showing that µ is a probability measure. 4 Fourier transforms For a topological space X and a positive Borel measure µ on X, F X is called a support of µ if i) F is closed, ii) µf c ), and iii) if G is open and G F then µg F ) >. If F 1 and F are supports of µ, it is straightforward that F 1 F. It is a fact that if X is second-countable then µ has a support, which we denote by supp µ. 9 Lemma. If µ is a Borel measure on a topological space X and µ has a support supp µ, if f : X [, ) is continuous and fdµ then f) for all X supp µ. Proof. Let F supp µ and let E { X : f) }. E is an open subset of X. Suppose by contradiction that there is some E F, i.e. that E F. Because f is continuous and f) >, there is some open neighborhood G of for which fy) > f)/ for y U. Then G F, so G F and because F is the support of µ, µg F ) > and a fortiori µg) >. Then X fdµ G fy)dµy) G f) f) dµy) µg) >, a contradiction. Therefore E F, i.e. for all F, f). The following lemma asserts that a certain function is nonzero λ d -almost everywhere, where λ d is Lebesgue measure on R d. 1 9 Charalambos D. Aliprantis and Kim C. Border, Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker s Guide, third ed., p. 44, Theorem 1.14. 1 Ward Cheney and Will Light, A Course in Approimation Theory, p. 91, chapter 13, Lemma 6. 6

Lemma 3. Let 1,..., n be distinct points in R d, let u C n not be the zero vector, and define gy) u j e πij y, y R d. j1 For λ d -almost all y R d, gy). The following theorem gives conditions under which the Fourier transform of a Borel measure on R d is strictly positive definite. 11 Theorem 4. If µ is a finite Borel measure on R d and λ d supp µ) >, then ˆµ : R d C is strictly positive definite. Proof. For distinct 1,..., n R d and for nonzero u C n, u j u k ˆµ j k ) R d u j u k e R πij k) y dµy) d n ) u j e πij y u k e πi k y dµy) j1 k1 u j e πij y dµy) R d j1 gy) dµy). R d It is apparent that this is nonnegative. If it is equal to then because g is continuous we obtain from Lemma that gy) for all y supp µ, i.e. gy) for all y supp µ. In other words, supp µ {y R d : gy) }. But by Lemma 3, λ d {y R d : gy) }), so λ d supp µ), contradicting the hypothesis λ d supp µ) >. Therefore R d gy) dµy) >, which shows that ˆµ is strictly positive definite. 5 Schoenberg s theorem Let X,, ) be a real inner product space. We call a function F : X R radial when y implies that F ) F y). 11 Ward Cheney and Will Light, A Course in Approimation Theory, p. 9, chapter 13, Theorem 3. 7

An identity that is worth memorizing is that for y R, e π e πiy d e πy. R Using this and Fubini s theorem yields, y R d, e π,y e π y. R d e π Lemma 5. For α > and y R d, π ) ) d/ ep π R α α e πi,y d e α y. d Proof. Define T : R d R d by T ) π α, Rd. T ) π α I L Rd ) and J T ) det T ) π d/. α) Let u R d and define f) e π e πi,u. By the change of variables formula, 1 f T ) J T dλ d fdλ d, R d T R d ) and because T is self-adjoint this is π T ) e πi,t u π ) d/ d α R d e and therefore R d π α e π R d e πi,u d, ) ) d/ ep π α e πi,t u d e π u. For u T 1 y) α π y this is π ) ) d/ ep π R α α e πi,y d e α y, d proving the claim. We now prove that on a real inner product space, e α positive definite whenever α >. 13 is strictly 1 Charalambos D. Aliprantis and Owen Burkinshaw, Principles of Real Analysis, third ed., p. 393, Theorem 4.7. 13 Ward Cheney and Will Light, A Course in Approimation Theory, p. 14, chapter 15, Theorem. 8

Theorem 6. Let X,, ) be a real inner product space. If α >, then is radial and strictly positive definite. e α, X, Proof. Let 1,..., n be distinct points in X. There is an n-dimensional linear subspace V of X that contains 1,..., n. By the Gram-Schmidt process, V has an orthonormal basis {v 1,..., v n }. Define T : V R n by T v j e j, where {e 1,..., e n } is the standard basis for R n, which is an orthogonal transformation, and define fu) e α u, u R d. For u C n, u, u j u k e α j k u j u k ep α T j k ) ) u j u k ft j T k ). Now, let µ be the Borel measure on R d whose density with respect to λ d is ) π d/ y ep α) π α y. Because µ is absolutely continuous with respect to λ d, λ d supp µ) >, so Theorem 4 states that the Fourier transform ˆµ : R d C is strictly positive definite. Applying Lemma 5, the Fourier transform of µ is π ) ) d/ ˆµu) ep π R α α y e πi y,u dy e α u fu), d so f is strictly positive definite. Because T is an orthogonal transformation it is in particular one-to-one, so T 1,..., T n are distinct points in R d. Thus the fact that f is strictly positive definite means that u j u k e α j k u j u k ft j T k ) >, which establishes that e α is strictly positive definite. The following is Schoenberg s theorem. 14 14 Ward Cheney and Will Light, A Course in Approimation Theory, p. 11, chapter 15, Theorem 1; René L. Schilling, Renming Song, and Zoran Vondraček, Bernstein Functions: Theory and Applications, p. 14, Theorem 1.14; William F. Donoghue Jr., Distributions and Fourier Transforms, p. 5, 41. 9

Theorem 7 Schoenberg s theorem). Let X,, ) be a real inner product space. If f : [, ) R is completely monotone, f) 1, and f is not constant, then f ), X [, ), is radial and strictly positive definite. Proof. Because f is completely monotone, the Bernstein-Widder theorem Theorem 1) tells us that there is a Borel probability measure µ on [, ) such that ft) e st dµs), t [, ), that is, f is the Laplace transform of µ. Now, the Laplace transform of δ is t 1, and because f is not constant, the Laplace transform of µ is not equal to the Laplace transform of δ, which implies that µ δ. 15 Therefore µ, )) >. Let 1,..., n be distinct points in X and let u C n, u. Then, because n n u ju k, u j u k f j k ) + u j u k u j u k µ{}) 1, ) s) 1, ) s) gs)dµs). ep s j k ) dµs) u j u k ep s j k ) dµs) u j u k ep s j k ) dµs) u j u k ep s j k ) dµs) Assume by contradiction that gs)dµs). Because g, this implies that µ{s [, ) : gs) > }). 16 By Theorem 6, for each s >, u j u k ep s j k ) >, 15 Bert Fristedt and Lawrence Gray, A Modern Approach to Probability Theory, p. 18, 13.5, Theorem 6. 16 Charalambos D. Aliprantis and Kim C. Border, Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker s Guide, third ed., p. 411, Theorem 11.16. 1

so gs) > when s >. Thus µ, )), a contradiction. Therefore, u j u k f j k ) gs)dµs) >, which shows that f ) is strictly positive definite. 11