TIME DOMAIN COMPARISONS OF MEASURED AND SPECTRALLY SIMULATED BREAKING WAVES

Similar documents
EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF NUMERICAL MODEL FOR NONLINEAR WAVE EVOLUTIONS

Nonlinear dynamics of shoaling gravity waves

Spectral Energy Balance of Breaking Waves within the Surf Zone*

Improved Performance in Boussinesq-type Equations

Alongshore Momentum Balance: Currents

Bottom friction effects on linear wave propagation

Evaluation of a source-function wavemaker for generating random directionally spread waves in the sea-swell band

ANALYTIC SOLUTION FOR THE FORCED MEAN CROSS-SHORE FLOW IN THE SURF ZONE

Swash Zone Dynamics: Modeling and Data Analysis

Numerical simulation of wave overtopping using two dimensional breaking wave model

Modeling Wind Wave Evolution from Deep to Shallow Water

MULTISCALE NUMERICAL STUDY OF TURBULENT FLOW AND BUBBLE ENTRAINMENT

Advances and perspectives in numerical modelling using Serre-Green Naghdi equations. Philippe Bonneton

Surface Wave Processes on the Continental Shelf and Beach

NONLINEAR(PROPAGATION(OF(STORM(WAVES:( INFRAGRAVITY(WAVE(GENERATION(AND(DYNAMICS((

PARAMETRIC WAVE-BREAKING ON STEEP REEFS

Paul de Groot. The thesis committee consists of: Prof. dr. ir. M.J.F. Stive Prof. dr. ir. L.C. Van Rijn Ir. S.G.J. Aarninkhof Ir. G.

Well-balanced shock-capturing hybrid finite volume-finite difference schemes for Boussinesq-type models

Transformation of irregular waves in the inner surf zone

GENERAL SOLUTIONS FOR THE INITIAL RUN-UP OF A BREAKING TSUNAMI FRONT

Suspended sand transport in surf zones

Wave Propagation Across Muddy Seafloors

Evolution of random directional wave and rogue/freak wave occurrence

Scale effects in numerical modelling of beach profile erosion

Effect of wave frequency and directional spread on shoreline runup

CHAPTER 20 THE MAXIMUM SIGNIFICANT WAVE HEIGHT IN THE SOUTHERN NORTH SEA

Berm and Dune Erosion during a Storm

Proceedings of the 7 th International Conference on HydroScience and Engineering Philadelphia, USA September 10-13, 2006 (ICHE 2006) ISBN:

FREAK WAVES: BEYOND THE BREATHER SOLUTIONS OF NLS EQUATION

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines. Testing and Extrapolation Methods Loads and Responses, Ocean Engineering,

QUASI 3-D EFFECTS IN INFRAGRAVITY WAVES

2017 年環境流體力學短期講座 Short Course on Environmental Flows

Thomas Pierro, Donald Slinn, Kraig Winters

BOUSSINESQ-TYPE EQUATIONS WITH VARIABLE COEFFICIENTS FOR NARROW-BANDED WAVE PROPAGATION FROM ARBITRARY DEPTHS TO SHALLOW WATERS

Refraction of Surface Gravity Waves by Shear Waves

A Coupled VOF-Eulerian Multiphase CFD Model To Simulate Breaking Wave Impacts On Offshore Structures

Water Particle Velocities under Shoaling and Breaking Waves

Occurrence of Freak Waves from Envelope Equations in Random Ocean Wave Simulations

Modeling of Coastal Ocean Flow Fields

Influence of bed slope and friction on the linear stability of planar beaches

Recent developments in multi-beam echo-sounder processing at the Delft

Efficient non-hydrostatic modelling of 3D wave-induced currents using a subgrid approach

Access from the University of Nottingham repository:

Green-Naghdi type solutions to the Pressure Poisson equation with Boussinesq Scaling ADCIRC Workshop 2013

The shallow water equations Lecture 8. (photo due to Clark Little /SWNS)

Nobuhisa Kobayashi, M. ASCE 1 and Hooyoung Jung 2

Hepeng Zhang Ben King Bruce Rodenborn

An empirical solution for tsunami run-up on compound slopes

Numerical Modeling and Experiments of Wave Shoaling over Semi-buried Cylinders in Sandy Bottom

A Fully Coupled Model of Non-linear Wave in a Harbor

FIELD OBSERVATIONS OF SUSPENDED SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION, TURBULENCE, AND BEDFORMS. Drude F. Christensen 1 and Troels Aagaard 1.

GSA DATA REPOSITORY

Forcing a three-dimensional, hydrostatic, primitive-equation model for application in the surf zone: 2. Application to DUCK94

ABOUT SOME UNCERTAINTIES IN THE PHYSICAL AND NUMERICAL MODELING OF WAVE OVERTOPPING OVER COASTAL STRUCTURES

The role of resonant wave interactions in the evolution of extreme wave events

WAVE MODELLING IN THE WISE GROUP

Boundary Conditions, Data Assimilation and Predictability in Coastal Ocean Models

GENERATING AND ABSORBING BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR COMBINED WAVE-CURRENT SIMULATIONS

ANALYSIS OF SHALLOW WATER WAVE MEASUREMENTS RECORDED AT THE FIELD RESEARCH FACILITY

B048 Seabed Properties Derived from Ambient Noise

TR 155. Simplified calculation of wave orbital velocities. Report TR 155 Release 1.0 February R L Soulsby

B O S Z. - Boussinesq Ocean & Surf Zone model - International Research Institute of Disaster Science (IRIDeS), Tohoku University, JAPAN

EROSIVE BAR MIGRATION USING DENSITY AND DIAMETER SCALED SEDIMENT

Wave-driven setup and alongshore flows observed onshore of a submarine canyon

Wave transformation models with exact second-order transfer

Long waves induced by short-wave groups over a sloping bottom

Modeling of Coastal Ocean Flow Fields

IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING 1. An Explicit Data Assimilation Scheme for a Nonlinear Wave Prediction Model Based on a Pseudo-Spectral Method

Lecture 18: Wave-Mean Flow Interaction, Part I

A Numerical Implementation of a Nonlinear Mild Slope Model for Shoaling Directional Waves

ABSTRACT. KEY WORDS: Forelands, wave propagation, wave transmission, on site measurement, physical modelling, numerical modelling.

Nonlinear Evolution of a Vortex Ring

Simple Estimation of Wave Added Resistance from Experiments in Transient and Irregular Water Waves

A Multiphysics Strategy for Free Surface Flows

Quasi-3D Nearshore Circulation Equations: a CL-Vortex Force Formulation

Downloaded 05/01/17 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

SURF BEAT SHOALING. Peter Nielsen 1. Abstract

TUDelft. Numerical Modelling of Infragravity Wave Response during Delilah. Report submitted to RIKZ. Ap van Dongeren and Ad Reniers.

Coastal Engineering 114 (2016) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Coastal Engineering

Strongly nonlinear long gravity waves in uniform shear flows

Experimental and numerical investigation of 2D sloshing: scenarios near the critical filling depth

ROLE OF THE VERTICAL PRESSURE GRADIENT IN WAVE BOUNDARY LAYERS

THE HIGH-FREQUENCY PORTION OF WIND WAVE SPECTRA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS Don Resio & Chuck Long ERDC-CHL Vicksburg, MS

Numerical Studies of Backscattering from Time Evolving Sea Surfaces: Comparison of Hydrodynamic Models

Statistical properties of mechanically generated surface gravity waves: a laboratory experiment in a 3D wave basin

2. Governing Equations

A simple model of topographic Rossby waves in the ocean

Short-Term Wave Analysis

SAMPLE CHAPTERS UNESCO EOLSS WAVES IN THE OCEANS. Wolfgang Fennel Institut für Ostseeforschung Warnemünde (IOW) an der Universität Rostock,Germany

Waves on unsteady currents

Equations of fluid dynamics for image inpainting

Dynamic response and fluid structure interaction of submerged floating tunnels

Evaluating the results of Hormuz strait wave simulations using WAVEWATCH-III and MIKE21-SW

Chapter 1. Introduction to Nonlinear Space Plasma Physics

Contribution of HPC to the mitigation of natural risks. B. Feignier. CEA-DAM Ile de France Département Analyse, Surveillance, Environnement

Breather propagation in shallow water. 1 Introduction. 2 Mathematical model

A Spectral Shallow-water Wave Model with Nonlinear Energy- and Phase-evolution

Effect of wave directional spread on the radiation stress: Comparing theory and observations

Scattering of ECRF waves by edge density fluctuations and blobs

On deviations from Gaussian statistics for surface gravity waves

Transcription:

TIME DOMAIN COMPARISONS OF MEASRED AND SPECTRAY SIMATED BREAKING WAVES Mustafa Kemal Özalp 1 and Serdar Beji 1 For realistic wave simulations in the nearshore zone besides nonlinear interactions the dissipative effects of wave breaking must also be taken into account. This paper presents the applications of a spectral nonlinear wave model with a dissipative breaking mechanism introduced by Beji and Nadaoka (1997). Results obtained for spectral components are converted to the time series and compared with Beji and Battjes' (1993) laboratory measurements and the field measurements of Nakamura and Katoh (1992) in the surf zone. While the model predicts the spillingtype breaking of irregular waves in acceptable agreement with the measurements in time domain, the agreement is unsatisfactory for plunging-type breakers. Keywords: Spectral model; wave breaking; numerical simulation INTRODCTION Waves play active role in the formation of coastal lines, sediment transport and are important in the design of coastal and offshore structures. For realistic wave simulations in the nearshore zone besides nonlinear interactions the dissipative effects of wave breaking must also be taken into account. There are different methods used to model the wave breaking phenomena. An accurate but time consuming approach is the numerical solution of Navier-Stokes Equations (NSE), such as DNS, ES and RANS. On the other hand, concepts using the nonlinear shallow water equations or the Boussinesq equations are computationally very efficient; such as surface roller introduced by Svendsen (1984a, b) and artificial eddy viscosity term which was proposed by J.A. Zelt (1991). A different technique of introducing wave breaking into wave models as a dissipation term is suggested by Battjes and Janssen (1978) and Battjes (1986). Eldeberky & Battjes (1996) and Beji & Nadaoka (1997) further implemented the proposed dissipation terms into spectral wave models. This paper presents the applications of a spectral nonlinear wave model with a dissipative breaking mechanism (Beji and Nadaoka, 1997). Results obtained for spectral components are converted to time series. Numerical results both in spectral and time domain were later compared with the laboratory experiments (Beji and Battjes, 1993) and field observations (Nakamura and Katoh, 1992). Comparisons in spectral domain shows quite acceptable agreements. While the model predicts the spilling-type breaking of irregular waves in acceptable agreement with the measurements in time domain, the agreement is unsatisfactory for plunging-type breakers. There is a small phase shift occurring in simulations of both cases. While this problem may be related to the numerical algorithm, deviations in the wave profile between the predictions and experiments suggest the necessity for an improvement in the dissipation term. EVOTION EQATIONS A nonlinear spectral model valid for arbitrary water depths (Beji and Nadaoka, 1999) is used to model wave propagation over arbitrary depths da # dx = a,-# ' a a # + β a + ( #-( a. b #+. a #+. b. cos θ + + a. a #+. + b. b #+. sin θ + + 1 2 β a- a. b #-. + a #-. b. cos θ - + a. a #-. b. b #-. sin θ - (1a) 1 Faculty of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Istanbul Technical niversity, Maslak 34469, Istanbul, Turkey 1

2 COASTA ENGINEERING 2016 db # dx = a,-# ' b a # β a + ( #-( a. a #+. + b. b #+. cos θ + a. b #+. b #+. b. sin θ + + 1 2 β a- a. a #-. + b. b 9-. cos θ - a. b #-. + a #-. b. sin θ - where N is the number of frequency components retained in the solution, and (1b) a + = ; <=>-; >? @ +? A B =, a- = ; <D>+; >? @ +? A B D, δ + = k 9+H k. k #, δ - = k 9-H + k. k #, θ + = J K k #+. k. k # dx, θ - J = k #-. + k. k # dx K (2) a ' = ( C O J + C O J + P Q-P R ; A S k # ω # k # J a ( = ( C O 2 P Q-P R ; A ω # k # + SP Q P Q -P R ; A k #, β = S g 3 2 P R ;A PX Q P Q O A where ω # is the radian frequency which is equal to nδω, Δω being the frequency resolution. k # is computed for each component from the linear dispersion relation of the wave model for the local depth h x : C O ω # ( + C O k # + P Q-P R ; A ω # k # P Q P Q -P R ; A k # S = 0 (3) Eq. (1a) and (1b) are semi-empirically modified so as to include wave breaking effects as in Beji and Nadaoka (1997). The breaking modification is introduced in the same vein as Battjes' (1986) dissipation model for periodic waves. Thus, breaking effects in the spectral evolution equations are modelled as da # dx ] = B 2πγ S ω # C O # a # (4) db # dx ] = B 2πγ S ω # C O # b # where a # s and b # s are the spatially evolving Fourier amplitudes of the spectral model, is the local phase celerity computed for the dominant wave frequency ω and local depth h. C O # denotes the group velocity corresponding to the frequency ω # and local depth h according to the linear theory. The free index n runs from 1 to N, resulting in 2N number of nonlinearly coupled first-order differential equations for the unknown components a # x and b # x. The final form of the breaking wave model is formed by adding the expressions in eq. (3) to the right-hand sides of (1a) and (1b):

COASTA ENGINEERING 2016 3 da # dx = a,-# ' a a # + β a + ( #-( a. b #+. a #+. b. cos θ + + a. a #+. + b. b #+. sin θ + + 1 2 β a- a. b #-. + a #-. b. cos θ - + a. a #-. b. b #-. sin θ - B ω # 2πγ S C O # db # dx = a,-# ' b a # β a + ( #-( a # B ω # 2πγ S C O # b # a. a #+. + b. b #+. cos θ + a. b #+. b #+. b. sin θ + + 1 2 β a- a. a #-. + b. b 9-. cos θ - a. b #-. + a #-. b. sin θ - B ω # 2πγ S C O # a # B ω # 2πγ S C O # b # (5a) (5b) NMERICA SIMATIONS The modified spectral model is used for simulations of experiments of breaking waves over a bar and of actual breaking waves in the surf zone. Then the spectral output of the wave model is converted to the time domain and both spectral and time domain numerical results are compared with the actual data. Beji and Battjes' (1993) experimental measurements for waves with a JONSWAP type wave spectrum is simulated first. The peak frequency f N is 0.4 Hz for long waves and 1.0 Hz for short waves. The dominant frequency for the wave model is assigned to the mean frequency of the incident wave spectrum. Surface elevation data gathered at station 1 was segmented into 6 portions with 4096 data points and each portion was Fourier transformed. As a result, 2048 pairs of Fourier components, which covered a frequency range of 0.0024 5.0018 Hz, are calculated for each segment and used to reproduce the incident wave spectrum. The spectra are obtained after ensemble averaging all the realizations and frequency smoothing 40 neighbouring components. Finally, the Fourier coefficients of the spectra are used to compute time domain results at each station via Inverse Fourier Transform. This process is repeated for six different cases, half of them being non-breaking, spilling, and plunging-type breaking long waves and the other half being short waves with each type of breaker indicated. Next, the model is used to simulate the field measurements of Nakamura and Katoh (1992) on February 28. Stations 1-7 were located in the surf zone and hence the breaking effects were dominant over these stations. Stations 3-7 are used for numerical simulations since station 1 and 2 are virtually in the swash zone. The peak frequency for random waves is 0.078 Hz which corresponds to the period of 12.8 s. The numerical procedure used is the same as the experimental case. Surface elevation data at the Station 7 is divided into 12 portions with 1024 data points each and then Fourier transformed. 400 of the resultant 512 pairs of Fourier components, which covered a frequency range of 0.0020 0.7812 Hz, are used to generate the incident wave spectrum. Frequency smoothing was performed for 16 neighbouring components. RESTS Comparisons are given under separate headings. Figures show the spectral and time domain comparisons of measured and simulated waves. Breaking and non-breaking random waves over a submerged bar Spectral and time domain comparisons of numerical simulations and experimental data of Beji and Battjes (1993) are given first for short and then for long waves. There are 8 stations both in numerical simulations and experimental measurements. Spectral and time domain comparisons are presented side by side for ease of comparing. Figure 1, 2, and 3 show spectral and time domain comparisons for short non-breaking and breaking waves.

4 COASTA ENGINEERING 2016 Figure 1. Random non-breaking short waves with f p = 1. 0 Hz over a submerged bar. eft column shows wave spectra, right column shows time domain series. Solid line: experimental measurements, dashed line: computational results.

COASTA ENGINEERING 2016 5 Figure 2. Random spilling-type breaking short waves with f p = 1. 0 Hz over a submerged bar. eft column shows wave spectra, right column shows time domain series. Solid line: experimental measurements, dashed line: computational results.

6 COASTA ENGINEERING 2016 Figure 3. Random plunging-type breaking short waves with f p = 1. 0 Hz over a submerged bar. eft column shows wave spectra, right column shows time domain series. Solid line: experimental measurements, dashed line: computational results. Although spectral domain results for random non-breaking and breaking short waves show good overall agreement, computations deviate once the waves start breaking. ikewise, the time domain results are good for the first few stations, but the deviations grow for the latter stations. In addition, a small phase shift exists in each time domain computation.

COASTA ENGINEERING 2016 7 Figures 4, 5, and 6 belong to non-breaking and breaking random long waves. In this case, the spectral domain results show better agreement in comparison to short waves. The agreement in time domain results are better for non-breaking long waves. However, computations start deviating after the waves begin breaking. Figure 4. Random non-breaking long waves with f p = 0. 4 Hz over a submerged bar. eft column shows wave spectra, right column shows time domain series. Solid line: experimental measurements, dashed line: computational results.

8 COASTA ENGINEERING 2016 Figure 5. Random spilling-breaking long waves with f p = 0. 4 Hz over a submerged bar. eft column shows wave spectra, right column shows time domain series. Solid line: experimental measurements, dashed line: computational results.

COASTA ENGINEERING 2016 9 Figure 6. Random plunging-breaking long waves with f p = 0. 4 Hz over a submerged bar. eft column shows wave spectra, right column shows time domain series. Solid line: experimental measurements, dashed line: computational results.

10 COASTA ENGINEERING 2016 Breaking waves in surf zone Field measurements pose a more challenging case to simulate in comparison to laboratory experiments due to complexity of the wave field and the higher nonlinearity involved. Since station 7 served as the incoming boundary condition, it is not shown here. It should be remarked that bottom geometry was represented with some smoothing. Figure 7. Breaking waves in the surf zone with f p = 0. 078125 Hz at Station 6,5,4, and 3. eft column shows wave spectra, right column shows time domain series. Solid line: field measurements, dashed line: computational results.

COASTA ENGINEERING 2016 11 The spectral results show acceptable agreement, especially if allowances are made for the uncertainties involved in the directionality of waves and the exact form of the bottom topography. However, results of the numerical simulations deviate towards the swash zone. A phase shift also exists here as in the simulations of laboratory experiments. CONCSION The spectral model of Beji and Nadaoka (1997), which is capable of simulating both non-breaking and breaking waves is used for the simulation of non-breaking and breaking waves in laboratory experiments and field measurements. The agreement is quite reasonable for spectral domain results. Although time domain results show acceptable agreement for the simulations of laboratory experiments, field measurement simulations deviate more. Results suggest that the dissipation term should be modified in order for improving the predictions of the numerical model. Further, the phase shift problem must also be remedied. REFERENCES Battjes, J. A. (1986) Energy dissipation in breaking solitary and periodic waves. Delft. Battjes, J. A. and Janssen, J. P. F. M. (1978) Energy oss And Set-p Due To Breaking Of Random Waves, in Coastal Engineering. Hamburg, Germany, pp. 569 587. Beji, S. and Battjes, J. A. (1993) Experimental investigation of wave propagation over a bar, Coastal Engineering, 19(April), pp. 151 162. doi: 10.1016/0378-3839(93)90022-Z. Beji, S. and Nadaoka, K. (1997) Spectral Modelling of Nonlinear Wave Shoaling and Breaking over Arbitrary Depths, in Coastal Dynamics, pp. 285 294. Beji, S. and Nadaoka, K. (1999) A spectral model for unidirectional nonlinear wave propagation over arbitrary depths, Coastal Engineering, pp. 1 16. Eldeberky, Y. and Battjes, J. A. (1996) Spectral modeling of wave breaking: Application to Boussinesq equation, Journal of Geophysical Research, 101(C1), pp. 1253 1264. Nakamura, S. and Katoh, K. (1992) Generation of Infragravity Waves in Breaking Process of Wave Groups, in Coastal Engineering. Venice, Italy, pp. 990 1003. Svendsen, I. A. (1984a) Mass flux and undertow in a surf zone, Coastal Engineering, 8(4), pp. 347 365. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-3839(84)90030-9. Svendsen, I. A. (1984b) Wave heights and set-up in a surf zone, Coastal Engineering, 8(4), pp. 303 329. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-3839(84)90028-0. Zelt, J. A. (1991) The run-up of nonbreaking and breaking solitary waves, Coastal Engineering, 15(3), pp. 205 246. doi: 10.1016/0378-3839(91)90003-Y.