EM waves and interference. Review of EM wave equation and plane waves Energy and intensity in EM waves Interference

Similar documents
EM waves: energy, resonators. Scalar wave equation Maxwell equations to the EM wave equation A simple linear resonator Energy in EM waves 3D waves

34. Even more Interference Effects

EE485 Introduction to Photonics

Chapter 2 Basic Optics

ECE 484 Semiconductor Lasers

PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICAL OPTICS

Calculating Thin Film Stack Properties

Some Topics in Optics

Chapter 8 Optical Interferometry

3.5 Cavities Cavity modes and ABCD-matrix analysis 206 CHAPTER 3. ULTRASHORT SOURCES I - FUNDAMENTALS

Offset Spheroidal Mirrors for Gaussian Beam Optics in ZEMAX

Optics.

3.1 The Plane Mirror Resonator 3.2 The Spherical Mirror Resonator 3.3 Gaussian modes and resonance frequencies 3.4 The Unstable Resonator

Phys 531 Lecture 27 6 December 2005

Constructive vs. destructive interference; Coherent vs. incoherent interference

Nature of Light Part 2

Introduction to Condensed Matter Physics

Calculating Thin Film Stack Properties. Polarization Properties of Thin Films

Interference. Part-2. Gambar: Museum Victoria Australia

Electricity & Optics

LC circuit: Energy stored. This lecture reviews some but not all of the material that will be on the final exam that covers in Chapters

Course Secretary: Christine Berber O3.095, phone x-6351,

Chapter 1. Ray Optics

Astronomy 203 practice final examination

Optics for Engineers Chapter 9

Summary of Beam Optics

Physics 142 Wave Optics 1 Page 1. Wave Optics 1. For every complex problem there is one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. H.L.

Optics for Engineers Chapter 9

Lecture 19 Optical MEMS (1)

1 ESO's Compact Laser Guide Star Unit Ottobeuren, Germany Beam optics!

4: birefringence and phase matching

Non-linear Optics II (Modulators & Harmonic Generation)

Complex number review

The laser oscillator. Atoms and light. Fabry-Perot interferometer. Quiz

If the wavelength is larger than the aperture, the wave will spread out at a large angle. [Picture P445] . Distance l S

The laser oscillator. Atoms and light. Fabry-Perot interferometer. Quiz

Where are the Fringes? (in a real system) Div. of Amplitude - Wedged Plates. Fringe Localisation Double Slit. Fringe Localisation Grating

1. Consider the biconvex thick lens shown in the figure below, made from transparent material with index n and thickness L.

Part 1 - Basic Interferometers for Optical Testing

Interference, Diffraction and Fourier Theory. ATI 2014 Lecture 02! Keller and Kenworthy

Fourier Approach to Wave Propagation

Lecture 4: Optics / C2: Quantum Information and Laser Science

S. Blair September 27,

Light matter interaction. Ground state spherical electron cloud. Excited state : 4 quantum numbers n principal (energy)

Electromagnetic fields and waves

LECTURE 23: LIGHT. Propagation of Light Huygen s Principle

PHY2049 Fall11. Final Exam Solutions (1) 700 N (2) 350 N (3) 810 N (4) 405 N (5) 0 N

PHYS 408, Optics. Problem Set 1 - Spring Posted: Fri, January 8, 2015 Due: Thu, January 21, 2015.

Week 7: Interference

September 14, Monday 4. Tools for Solar Observations-II

Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. ECE318S Fundamentals of Optics. Final Exam. April 16, 2007.

Wave Propagation in Uniaxial Media. Reflection and Transmission at Interfaces

The science of light. P. Ewart

Where k = 1. The electric field produced by a point charge is given by

Gaussian Beam Optics, Ray Tracing, and Cavities

Vågrörelselära och optik

Crash Course on Optics I & II. COST Action IC1101 OPTICWISE 4 th Training School

Preliminary Topics in EM

Chapter 33. Electromagnetic Waves

IMPRS: Ultrafast Source Technologies

LECTURE 23: LIGHT. Propagation of Light Huygen s Principle

B.Tech. First Semester Examination Physics-1 (PHY-101F)

Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics 1. Spherical Waves. From Waves to Rays. Lenses. Chromatic Aberrations. Mirrors. Outline

Lecture Notes on Wave Optics (03/05/14) 2.71/2.710 Introduction to Optics Nick Fang

Lecture 2: Thin Films. Thin Films. Calculating Thin Film Stack Properties. Jones Matrices for Thin Film Stacks. Mueller Matrices for Thin Film Stacks

Designing a Computer Generated Hologram for Testing an Aspheric Surface

Spectroscopic Instruments

Homework 1. Nano Optics, Fall Semester 2018 Photonics Laboratory, ETH Zürich

Fabry-Perot Interferometers

PH 222-3A Spring 2010

PHYS 110B - HW #5 Fall 2005, Solutions by David Pace Equations referenced equations are from Griffiths Problem statements are paraphrased

21. Propagation of Gaussian beams

Lecture 5: Polarization. Polarized Light in the Universe. Descriptions of Polarized Light. Polarizers. Retarders. Outline

Metrology and Sensing

Electromagnetic Waves. Chapter 33 (Halliday/Resnick/Walker, Fundamentals of Physics 8 th edition)

Laser Optics-II. ME 677: Laser Material Processing Instructor: Ramesh Singh 1

PHYS 408, Optics. Problem Set 4 - Spring Posted: Fri, March 4, 2016 Due: 5pm Thu, March 17, 2016

Final Exam is coming!

Lecture 9: Introduction to Diffraction of Light

A refl = R A inc, A trans = T A inc.

Lecture 2: Basic Astronomical Optics. Prisms, Lenses, and Mirrors

Electromagnetic Waves

General Physics II Summer Session 2013 Review Ch - 16, 17, 18

Light as a Transverse Wave.

Properties of waves. Question. Ch 22, : Waves & interference. Question. Phase difference & interference

Q2 (Michelson) - solution here

= n. 1 n. Next apply Snell s law at the cylindrical boundary between the core and cladding for the marginal ray. = n 2. sin π 2.

The Interaction of Light and Matter: α and n

Lecture 8 Notes, Electromagnetic Theory II Dr. Christopher S. Baird, faculty.uml.edu/cbaird University of Massachusetts Lowell

OPSE FINAL EXAM Fall 2016 YOU MUST SHOW YOUR WORK. ANSWERS THAT ARE NOT JUSTIFIED WILL BE GIVEN ZERO CREDIT.

Vector diffraction theory of refraction of light by a spherical surface

MODERN OPTICS. P47 Optics: Unit 9

Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. ECE426F Optical Engineering. Final Exam. Dec. 17, 2003.

Einstein Classes, Unit No. 102, 103, Vardhman Ring Road Plaza, Vikas Puri Extn., Outer Ring Road New Delhi , Ph. : ,

Metrology and Sensing

Chapter 35 Physical Optics: Light as a wave

On my honor, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this examination.

Lecture 11: Introduction to diffraction of light

Propagation of EM Waves in material media

Summer 2016 Written Comprehensive Exam Opti 501. System of units: MKSA

Transcription:

EM waves and interference Review of EM wave equation and plane waves Energy and intensity in EM waves Interference

Maxwell's Equations to wave eqn The induced polarization, P, contains the effect of the medium: E = 0 E = B B = 0 Take the curl: E ( ) = t Use the vector ID: t B = E c t + µ 0 B = t ( ) = B( A C) C( A B) A B C P t E c t + µ 0 E ( ) = E ( ) ( )E = E E c E t = µ 0 P t P t Inhomogeneous Wave Equation

Wave equation in a medium The induced polarization, P, contains the effect of the medium: E c E t = µ 0 P t Sinusoidal waves of all frequencies are solutions to the wave equation The polarization (P) is sometimes a driving term for the waves (esp in nonlinear optics). In this case the polarization determines which frequencies will occur. For linear response, P will oscillate at the same frequency as the input. P( E) = ε 0 χe In nonlinear optics, the induced polarization is more complicated: ( ) P( E) = ε 0 χ () E + χ () E + χ (3) E 3 +... The extra nonlinear terms can lead to new frequencies.

Solving the wave equation: linear induced polarization For low irradiances, the polarization is proportional to the incident field: P( E) = ε 0 χe The displacement vector combines the effect of E and P D = ε 0 E + P = ε ( 0 + χ )E = ε E = n E In this simple (and most common) case, the wave equation becomes: E c E t = c χ E t E n c E t = 0 Using: ε 0 µ 0 = / c ε 0 ( + χ ) = ε = n D does not always point in the same direction as E: Birefringence: n is a function of linear polarization direction Optically activity: n is a function of circular polarization state In this case, χ and ε are tensors operating on E to change its direction

Vector wave equation The EM wave equation in vector form E is a vector that depends on r and t Wave equation is actually a set of 3 equations: E x E y E z! E n c E t = 0 ( r,t) n c t E x ( r,t) n c t E y ( r,t) n c t E z ( r,t) = 0 ( r,t) = 0 ( r,t) = 0

Plane wave solutions for the wave equation If we assume the solution has no dependence on x or y: E( z,t) = x E ( z,t ) + y E ( z,t ) + z E ( z,t ) = z E ( z,t ) E z n c E t = 0 The solutions are oscillating functions, for example ( ) = ˆx E x cos k z z ωt E z,t ( ) Where ω = k c, k = πn / λ, v ph = c / n This is a linearly polarized wave.

Complex notation for waves Write cosine in terms of exponential E( z,t) = ˆx E x cos( kz ωt +φ) = ˆx E x Note E-field is a real quantity. It is convenient to work with just one part We will use Svelto: E 0 e Then take the real part. ( ) +i kz ωt E 0 e ( ) i kz ωt ( ( ) + e i( kz ωt+φ ) ) ei kz ωt+φ No factor of In nonlinear optics, we have to explicitly include conjugate term

Wave energy and intensity Both E and H fields have a corresponding energy density (J/m 3 ) For static fields (e.g. in capacitors) the energy density can be calculated through the work done to set up the field ρ = εe + µh Some work is required to polarize the medium Energy is contained in both fields, but H field can be calculated from E field

Calculating H from E in a plane wave Assume a non-magnetic medium ( ) = ˆx E x cos( kz ωt) E z,t! E = B t = µ 0 H t Can see H is perpendicular to E H µ 0 =! ˆx ŷ ẑ E = x y z t E x 0 0 Integrate on time to get H-field: H = ŷ k E x sin( k z ω t)dt = ŷ k E cos k z ωt x µ 0 µ 0 ω = ŷ z E x = ŷke x sin( kz ωt) ( ) = ŷ k E x cos k z ωt ω µ 0 ( )

H field from E field H field for a propagating wave is in phase with E- field E( z,t) = ˆx E x cos( k z ω t) H( z,t) = ŷ k E x cos( k z ωt) ω µ 0 Amplitudes are not independent H y = H y = k ω µ 0 E x k = n ω c n cµ 0 E x = nε 0 ce x c = µ 0 ε 0 µ 0 c = ε 0 c

Energy density in a traveling EM wave Back to energy density, non-magnetic ρ = εe + µ 0 H ε = ε 0 n ρ = ε 0 n E + µ 0 n ε 0 c E µ 0 ε 0 c = ρ = ε 0 n E + ε 0 n E = ε 0 n E 0 cos Equal energy in both components of wave H = nε 0 ce ( kz ωt)

Cycle-averaged energy density Optical oscillations are faster than detectors Average over one cycle: ρ = ε 0 n T E 0 cos ( k z z ωt)dt T 0 Graphically, we can see this should = ½.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 k z = 0 k z = π/4 0. 0.5.0.5.0 Regardless of position z t/t ρ = ε 0 n E 0

Intensity and the Poynting vector Intensity is an energy flux (J/s/cm ) In EM the Poynting vector give energy flux S = E H For our plane wave, S = E H = E 0 cos( k z z ωt)nε 0 ce 0 cos k z z ωt S = nε 0 ce 0 cos ( k z z ωt)ẑ S is along k Time average: S = nε 0 ce 0ẑ Intensity is the magnitude of S ( ) ˆx ŷ I = nε ce = c 0 0 n ρ = V ρ phase Photon flux: F = I hν

General 3D plane wave solution Assume separable function E(x, y,z,t) ~ f ( x) f y E( z,t) = x E z,t ( ) f 3 z ( ) + ( )g t y E z,t E(x, y,z,t) = E 0 e i( k r ωt ) Now k-vector can point in arbitrary direction With this solution in W.E.: ( ) ( ) + z E z,t ( ) = n ( ) c t E z,t Solution takes the form: E(x, y,z,t) = E 0 e ikxx e ikyy e ikzz e iωt = E 0 e i ( k xx+k y y+k z z) e iωt n ω c = k x + k y + k z = k k Valid even in waveguides and resonators

Grad and curl of 3D plane waves Simple trick: E = x E x + y E y + z E z For a plane wave, E = i k x E x + k y E y + k z E z Similarly, Consequence: since ( ) = i k E ( ) E = i k E E = 0, ( ) k E For a given k direction, E lies in a plane E.g. x and y linear polarization for a wave propagating in z direction

Writing electric field expressions Write an expression for a complex E-field as shown: y E 0 θ z E( y,z,t ) = E [ 0 ŷcosθ ẑsinθ ]e i( kysinθ+kzcosθ ωt)

Interference: ray and wave pictures Interference results from the sum of two waves with different phase: E tot ( Δφ) = E e ikz + E e ikz+δφ We measure intensity, which leads to interference ( Δφ) E e ikz + E e ikz+δφ = E + E e iδφ I tot = I + I + I I e iδφ + I I e iδφ = I + I + I I cos( Δφ) For the case where I = I, I tot ( Δφ) = I + cos Δφ ( ) ( ) ( ) = 4I cos Δφ / How to generate, calculate phase difference?

The Fizeau Wedge Interferometer The Fizeau wedge yields a complex pattern of variable-width fringes, but it can be used to measure the wavelength of a laser beam.

Fizeau wedge calculation Interference between reflections from internal surfaces α L Angle is very small, neglect change in direction Path difference: Δl = L sinα Lα Phase difference: Δφ = ω L n Δl π c λ α n = Interference: I tot ( Δφ) = I + I + I I cos Δφ ( ) One fringe from one max to the next, so maxima are at Δφ = π m In this interferometer, minimum path = 0, we can measure absolute wavelength: Δφ = π m = π L λ α λ = L m α

Newton's Rings

Newton's Rings Get constructive interference when an integral number of half wavelengths occur between the two surfaces (that is, when an integral number of full wavelengths occur between the path of the transmitted beam and the twice reflected beam). This effect also causes the colors in bubbles and oil films on puddles.

Curved wavefronts Rays are directed normal to surfaces of constant phase These surfaces are the wavefronts Radius of curvature is approximately at the focal point Spherical waves are solutions to the wave equation (away from r = 0) E + n ω E = 0 E Scalar r ( c r ei ± kr ωt ) + outward I - inward r

Paraxial approximations For rays, paraxial = small angle to optical axis Ray slope: tanθ θ For spherical waves where power is directed forward: e i k r = exp ik x + y + z k x + y + z = k z + x + y k z + x + y z z e i k r ω t ( ) e i k z exp i k x + y z ω t Wavefront = surface of constant phase For x, y >0, t must increase. Wave is diverging: Expanding to st order z is radius of curvature = R φ = 0 k x + y R = ω t

Newton s rings: interfere plane and spherical waves Add two fields: E ( r ) = E0 + E0 e i k r R Assume equal amplitude For Newton s rings, x phase shift Calculate intensity: I ( r ) E0 + E0 e k r i R k r = E0 + E0 cos R Local k increases with r kr cos r = cos ( klocal r ) R

Shearing interferometer Combine two waves with a lateral offset ( shear ) x s E tot ( x) = E 0 exp i +E 0 exp i k R k R (( x x s ) + y ) (( x + x s ) + y ) I tot ( x) = I 0 + exp i ( x x s ) x + x s k( x x s ) R k ( x + x s ) R + c.c. ( ) = x xx s + x s x + xx s + x s ( ) = 4xx s I tot ( x) = I 0 + cos kx s R x Fringes are straight, equally spaced Combine with constant tilt in y direction: leads to fringe rotation with divergence

Tilted window: ray propagation Calculate phase shift caused by the insertion of the window into an interferometer. Ray optics: Add up optical path for each segment Subtract optical path w/o window Δd = nl AB + L BC L A B L L AB = B C L w L A B cosθ = L w cosθ L BC = L B C + L B B sinθ Use Snell s Law to reduce to: θ A L w θ C B C Reference line B z Δd = n L w cosθ L w cosθ n n n

Tilted window: wave propagation Write expression for tilted plane wave ( ) = E 0 exp i k x x + k z z E x,z ( ) = E exp i ω 0 c n xsinθ + z cosθ ( ) Snell s Law: phase across surfaces is conserved k x x = ω c nsinθ is constant Δφ = ( k cosθ )L w ( k cosθ )L w B C L w C This approach can be used to calculate phase of prism A θ B z Reference line pairs and grating pairs θ n n n

Multiple-beam interference: The Fabry-Perot Interferometer or Etalon A Fabry-Perot interferometer is a pair of parallel surfaces that reflect beams back and forth. An etalon is a type of Fabry-Perot etalon, and is a piece of glass with parallel sides. The transmitted wave is an infinite series of multiply reflected beams.

Multiple-beam interference: general formulation Incident wave: E 0 Reflected wave: E 0r Reflected wave: n = t t e iδ / E 0 Transmitted wave: E t t 0t eiδ / r n n = ( ) e iδ E 0 r, t = reflection, transmission coefficients from air to glass r, t = from glass to air δ = round-trip phase delay inside medium = k 0 ( n L cos θ t ) Transmitted wave: E 0t = t t e iδ / E 0 + r E 0r = re 0 + t t r e iδ E 0 + t t r r ( ( ) e iδ + ( ( r ) e iδ ) + ( ( r ) e iδ ) 3 ) + (( ) e iδ ) E 0 + t t e iδ / r t t e iδ / r (( ) e iδ (( ) e iδ ) E 0 )3 E 0

Stokes Relations for reflection and transmission = Time reversal: Same amplitudes, reversed propagation direction E oi = ( E oi r)r + ( E oi t) t t t = r ( E oi t) r + ( E oi r)t = 0 r = r Notes: relations apply to angles connected by Snell s Law true for any polarization, but not TIR convention for which interface experiences a sign change can vary

Fabry-Perot transmission The transmitted wave field is: E 0t = t t e iδ / E 0 + r r ( ( ) e iδ + ( ( ) e iδ ) + ( ( r ) e iδ ) 3 ) + Stokes relations r = r r = r t t = r = t t e iδ / E 0 E 0t = t t / eiδ r e E iδ 0 Power transmittance: ( + r e iδ + ( r e iδ ) + ( r e iδ ) 3 ) + = t t eiδ / E 0 ( t t ) T E 0t E 0 = t t / eiδ r e iδ = ( t t ) ( r e +iδ )( r e iδ ) = {+ r 4 r cosδ} = ( r ) {+ r 4 r [ sin (δ / )]} = ( r ) { r + r 4 + 4r sin (δ / )]} Dividing numerator and denominator by T = ( ) + F sin δ / Where: ( r ) n=0 ( x) = + x + x + x 3 +! where: ( r e iδ ) n r F = r

Multiple-beam interference: simple limits Reflected waves Full transmission: sin( ) = 0, d = π m Minimum transmission: sin( ) =, d = π (m+/) T = Destructive interference for reflected wave ( ) + F sin δ / } internal st reflection reflections Constructive interference for reflected wave

Etalon transmittance vs. thickness, wavelength, or angle T = The transmittance varies significantly with thickness or wavelength. We can also vary the incidence angle, which also affects δ. As the reflectance of each surface (R=r ) approaches, the widths of the high-transmission regions become very narrow. ( ) + F sin δ / Transmission max: sin( ) = 0, d = π m δ = ω c n L cos [ θ t ] = πm At normal incidence: λ m = n L n L = m λ m or m

The Etalon Free Spectral Range The Free Spectral Range is the wavelength range between transmission maxima. λ FSR = Free Spectral Range λ FSR For neighboring orders: 4πnL λ 4πnL λ = π λ λ = nl = λ λ λ λ λ λ = λ λ λ λ FSR λ FSR λ nl λ FSR λ = λ nl = ν FSR ν ν FSR c nl /(round trip time)

Etalon Linewidth The Linewidth δlw is a transmittance peak's full-width-half-max (FWHM). T = A maximum is where δ / mπ + δ / and sin δ / Under these conditions (near resonance), T = + F δ / 4 This is a Lorentzian profile, with FWHM at: F 4 δ LW ( ) + F sin δ / = δ LW 4 / F ( ) δ / This transmission linewidth corresponds to the minimum resolvable wavelength.

Etalon Finesse resolution The Finesse, I, is the ratio of the Free Spectral Range and the Linewidth: δ = π corresponds to one FSR I δ δ FSR FW = π π F = 4 / F Using: r F = r I = π r taking r The Finesse is the number of wavelengths the interferometer can resolve.

Tools: scanning Fabry-Perot Resonator with piezo control over mirror separation http://www.thorlabs.us/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup_id=859 Wavelength range: 535-80nm (ours) SA00 (ours) FSR.5 GHz Finesse > 00 Resolution 7.5MHz SA0 FSR 0 GHz Finesse > 50 Resolution 67MHz

Tools: fixed plate Fabry-Perot

Multilayer coatings Typical laser mirrors and camera lenses use many layers. The reflectance and transmittance can be custom designed

Multilayer thin-films: wave/matrix treatment Use boundary conditions to relate fields at the boundaries Phase shifts connect fields just after I to fields just before II Express this relation as a transfer matrix Multiply matrices for multiple layers

High-reflector design 0 periods periods Reflectivity can reach > 99.99% at a specific wavelength > 99.5% for over 50nm Bandwidth and reflectivity are better for S polarization.

Interference filter design Transmission % A thin layer is sandwiched between two high reflector coatings - very large free spectral range, high finesse - typically 5-0nm bandwidth, available throughout UV to IR

Geometric optics Approaches: Paraxial calculations (assume small angle to optical axis) Imaging equations: simple lens, Lensmakers for thick lens ABCD matrices for optical system Non-paraxial, general case Analytic calculation of aberrations: Zernike polynomials, Taylor-type expansions of wavefront error Computer tracing (no approximations). Example: Zemax, Oslo Design procedure Find existing design close to what could work for application Paraxial trace with ray diagram Calculate magnification, limiting apertures Optimize with ABCD matrices or computer program Analyze aberrations

Geometric optics: lenses For a nice summary, see Lens (optics) Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/lens_(optics)

Geometric optics: imaging equation f = s + s s, s are positive as shown s, s = infinity: rays are collimated M = s s Magnification calculate with similar triangles M < 0 inverted image M = - when s = s = f, : imaging

Geometric optics: virtual images s, s < 0 if on the opposite side of lens virtual image: position where image seems to come from Concave lens: f < 0 Same convention for s, s

Raytracing: single curved interface Snell: n sin( θ i ) = n sin( θ r ) θ i y p = tan(θ i φ) θ i φ y q = tan(φ θ r ) φ θ r y R = sin(φ) φ p θ i φ 0 y θ r φ R φ θ r q n n n = sin θ i n sin θ r ( ) ( ) θ i = φ + y p θ r φ y q = y R + y p y R y q = R + p R q n R ( q ) = n R + p ( ) R n n In paraxial appx, y s cancel ( ) = n q + n p

Raytracing: two curved interfaces Eqn from st: - add second interface: R > 0 if center is to right - assume y =y ( n n ) = n R q + n p Adapt to nd interface: n n q q p q ( ) = n R n n q n q y p 0 R q q Solve eqn for image distance n q = R n n R n n ( ) = n ( ) n q ( n n )+ n R p n = R R n q + p p n n n n = R R n f f = s o + s i Focal length (lensmaker s eqn) Imaging equation

Aberrations For non-paraxial rays errors in how rays focus Spherical aberration Coma: tilted lens, off-axis points

Lens systems It is possible to cascade the lens imaging equation for multiple lenses: Image from lens is object for lens s s s 3 =d s s 4 For more complicated systems, use a matrix method: ABCD matrices Also good for resonators Does not account for aberrations d

ABCD ray matrices Formalism to propagate rays through optical systems Keep track of ray height r and ray angle θ = dr/dz = r Treat this pair as a vector: r r Optical system will modify both the ray height and angle, e.g. r A B r = r C D r Successive ABCD matrices multiply from the left Translation r = r + L r L r = r 0 r r

Translation: Flat interface r = r Window: calculate matrix L Refraction in ABCD L 0 n sinθ = n sinθ n θ n θ r = n r n 0 0 n / n 0 0 n = 0 0 n L 0 Special case: n =, n = n L / n 0 / n n n 0 0 / n 0 0 / n = L / n 0 Effective thickness reduced by n

Curved surfaces in ABCD Thin lens: matrix computes transition from one side of lens to other r = r r = r / p p 0 q r = r / q n n n q = f p r = r f p = r f + r Spherical interface: radius R lens A C B D 0 / f 0 n n n R n n

3D wave propagation E n j c t E = z E + E n(r) c t E = 0 Note: = x + y = r r( r r ) + r φ All linear propagation effects are included in LHS: diffraction, interference, focusing Previously, we assumed plane waves where transverse derivatives are zero. More general examples: Gaussian beams (including high-order) Waveguides Arbitrary propagation Can determine discrete solutions to linear equation (e.g. Gaussian modes, waveguide modes), then express fields in terms of those solutions.

Paraxial, slowly-varying approximations Assume waves are forward-propagating: E( r,t) = A( r)e i ( k z ω 0 t) + c.c. Refractive index is isotropic z A + ik z A k A + A + n ω 0 A = 0 c Fast oscillating carrier terms cancel (blue) Slowly-varying envelope: compare red terms Drop nd order deriv if π λ L A L A This ignores: Changes in z as fast as the wavlength Counterpropagating waves

Gaussian beam solutions to wave equation Without any source term, paraxial equation is ik z A + A = 0 Gaussian beam solutions can be written as: A( r,z) = A 0 + iξ e r ( ) ξ = z z z R = n πw 0 R λ = k w 0 w 0 +iξ Rayleigh range w ( ) = A 0 0 w( z) ei k z ω t E r, z,t ( ) e r w z ( ) e i k r R( z ) e iη( z)

Standard form of Gaussian beam equations w ( ) = A 0 0 w( z) ei k z ω t E r, z,t w( z) = w 0 + z z R ( ) e r w z ( ) e i k r R( z ) e iη( z) ( ) = z + z R R z z 0 0-0 -5 5 0-0 R(z) z/z R 0. -0-5 5 0-0. -0-0.4.5 0.4 /R(z) z/z R.0 Gouy phase η z ( ) = arctan z z R 0.5-0 -5 5 0-0.5 -.0 z/z R -.5

Complex q form for Gaussian beam This combines beam size and radius of curvature into one complex parameter q z This form is used for for ABCD calculations A( r,z) = A 0 ( ) = R( z) i λ π w ( z) q( z) = = z + i z R = R z = R z + iξ e ( ) i w 0 z R w r ( ) w 0 +iξ z z + z R i ( z) A r,z z R z + z R ( ) i λ π w ( z) = R( z) i Z ( z) ( ) = k q( z) e i R z w ( ) = z r q z ( ) z + z R z ( ) = w 0 + z z R = z z + z R = z R ( ) w 0 z + z R

Complex q vs standard form ( ) = k q( z) e i u r,z r q z ( ) Expand exponential: r exp i k = exp i k r q( z) = exp i k r R z ( ) i π λ with ( ) = R( z) i λ π w ( z) q z R z Expand leading inverse q: q( z) = i i z z + z + z R R z + z R = i ( ) i λ π w ( z) r i λ π w ( z) = e i k z + z R z + z R = i e i arctan ( z/z R ) w z R + z = 0 / z R i z R w z ( ) eiη z r R z e i arctan z/z R ( ) ( ) e r w ( z) ( ) a + ib = a + b i arctan b/a e ( )

( ) = k q( z) e i u r,z E r, z,t Difference between Siegman s complex q and standard form r q z ( ) = w 0 i z R w z w ( ) = A 0 0 w( z) ei k z ω t ( ) eiη z ( ) e r w z ( ) e i k r R( z ) e r w ( z) ( ) e i k r R( z ) e iη( z) Siegman s form for the complex q is used almost everywhere for the ABCD calculations. He uses the exp[+ I w t] convention, which accounts for the sign difference in the complex exponentials. With exp[-i w t] convention, define q as: q z ( ) = R( z) + i λ π w ( z) = z i z R

Compare Boyd s form to standard: Boyd s complex form is consistent with standard Gaussian beam form A( r,z) = A 0 + iξ e + iξ = = + i z / z R A( r,z) = A 0 ( i z R ) r ( ) = A0 e + i z / z R w 0 +iξ z R z R + i z = i z R = i z R z i z R q z q z ( ) e+ i z R r w 0 q z ( ) ( ) = i z R A 0 q z r ( ) w 0 +i z/z R ( ) e+ i k r q z ( )