On atoms in BCC-algebras

Similar documents
ON FUZZY TOPOLOGICAL BCC-ALGEBRAS 1

Algebras inspired by the equivalential calculus

On Derivations of BCC-algebras

arxiv: v1 [math.lo] 20 Oct 2007

A Structure of KK-Algebras and its Properties

ON A PERIOD OF ELEMENTS OF PSEUDO-BCI-ALGEBRAS

FUZZY BCK-FILTERS INDUCED BY FUZZY SETS

International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 7, 2013, no. 3, HIKARI Ltd, On KUS-Algebras. and Areej T.

Pure Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 1, 2012, no. 3, On CS-Algebras. Kyung Ho Kim

Scientiae Mathematicae Japonicae Online, Vol.4 (2001), a&i IDEALS ON IS ALGEBRAS Eun Hwan Roh, Seon Yu Kim and Wook Hwan Shim Abstract. In th

ON FILTERS IN BE-ALGEBRAS. Biao Long Meng. Received November 30, 2009

Anti Q-Fuzzy Group and Its Lower Level Subgroups

Research Article Generalized Derivations of BCC-Algebras

On Homomorphism and Algebra of Functions on BE-algebras

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 25 May 2013

BG/BF 1 /B/BM-algebras are congruence permutable

DUAL BCK-ALGEBRA AND MV-ALGEBRA. Kyung Ho Kim and Yong Ho Yon. Received March 23, 2007

370 Y. B. Jun generate an LI-ideal by both an LI-ideal and an element. We dene a prime LI-ideal, and give an equivalent condition for a proper LI-idea

ON SUB-IMPLICATIVE (α, β)-fuzzy IDEALS OF BCH-ALGEBRAS

Some Results About Generalized BCH-Algebras

Quasigroups and Related Systems 8 (2001), Hee Kon Park and Hee Sik Kim. Abstract. 1. Introduction

Coupled -structures and its application in BCK/BCI-algebras

DOI: /auom An. Şt. Univ. Ovidius Constanţa Vol. 25(1),2017, ON BI-ALGEBRAS

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 3 Oct 2009

Math 203A - Solution Set 1

TRANSITIVE AND ABSORBENT FILTERS OF LATTICE IMPLICATION ALGEBRAS

Generalized Fuzzy Ideals of BCI-Algebras

Axioms for the Real Number System

SOME VARIANTS OF LAGRANGE S FOUR SQUARES THEOREM

Some remarks on hyper MV -algebras

Axioms of Kleene Algebra

ON STRUCTURE OF KS-SEMIGROUPS

A DARK GREY P O N T, with a Switch Tail, and a small Star on the Forehead. Any

PROBLEMS, MATH 214A. Affine and quasi-affine varieties

BM-ALGEBRAS AND RELATED TOPICS. 1. Introduction

IMPLICATION ALGEBRAS

ON BP -ALGEBRAS. Sun Shin Ahn, Jeong Soon Han

PM functions, their characteristic intervals and iterative roots

Semigroup, monoid and group models of groupoid identities. 1. Introduction

Homework 1/Solutions. Graded Exercises

Linear Algebra. Chapter 8: Eigenvalues: Further Applications and Computations Section 8.2. Applications to Geometry Proofs of Theorems.

MTHSC 3190 Section 2.9 Sets a first look

MATH 433 Applied Algebra Lecture 22: Semigroups. Rings.

Boolean Algebra CHAPTER 15

SMARANDACHE R-MODULE AND COMMUTATIVE AND BOUNDED BE-ALGEBRAS. TBML College, Porayar , TamilNadu, India

PALINDROMIC AND SŪDOKU QUASIGROUPS

Math 203A - Solution Set 1

ON HOW TO CONSTRUCT LEFT SEMIMODULES FROM THE RIGHT ONES

A GENERAL THEORY OF ZERO-DIVISOR GRAPHS OVER A COMMUTATIVE RING. David F. Anderson and Elizabeth F. Lewis

On Regularity of Incline Matrices

languages by semifilter-congruences

Definition: A binary relation R from a set A to a set B is a subset R A B. Example:

4.4. Orthogonality. Note. This section is awesome! It is very geometric and shows that much of the geometry of R n holds in Hilbert spaces.

Direct Product of BF-Algebras

Scientiae Mathematicae Japonicae Online, Vol. 4(2001), FUZZY HYPERBCK IDEALS OF HYPERBCK ALGEBRAS Young Bae Jun and Xiao LongXin Received

THE REAL NUMBERS Chapter #4

Subalgebras and ideals in BCK/BCI-algebras based on Uni-hesitant fuzzy set theory

Maximal perpendicularity in certain Abelian groups

MATH 422, CSUSM. SPRING AITKEN

Well Ordered Sets (continued)

IMPLICATIVE BCS-ALGEBRA SUBREDUCTS OF SKEW BOOLEAN ALGEBRAS

ON FUZZY IDEALS OF PSEUDO MV -ALGEBRAS

THE DIRECT SUM, UNION AND INTERSECTION OF POSET MATROIDS

On Intuitionitic Fuzzy Maximal Ideals of. Gamma Near-Rings

SOME STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES OF HYPER KS-SEMIGROUPS

Soft subalgebras and soft ideals of BCK/BCI-algebras related to fuzzy set theory

Journal Algebra Discrete Math.

Introduction to Kleene Algebras

A NOTE ON MULTIPLIERS OF SUBTRACTION ALGEBRAS

MINIMAL GENERATING SETS OF GROUPS, RINGS, AND FIELDS

EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS (NOTES FOR STUDENTS) 1. RELATIONS

GENERALIZED DIFFERENCE POSETS AND ORTHOALGEBRAS. 0. Introduction

A CLOSURE SYSTEM FOR ELEMENTARY SITUATIONS

Math 120: Homework 6 Solutions

Generalized Derivation on TM Algebras

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7.

Algebraic Expressions

ON VARIETIES OF LEFT DISTRIBUTIVE LEFT IDEMPOTENT GROUPOIDS

Periodic lattice-ordered pregroups are distributive

Using automated reasoning in universal algebra: Several examples

DECOMPOSITIONS OF MULTIGRAPHS INTO PARTS WITH THE SAME SIZE

FREE STEINER LOOPS. Smile Markovski, Ana Sokolova Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Republic of Macedonia

D-bounded Distance-Regular Graphs

Standard Ideals in BCL + Algebras

Andrzej Walendziak, Magdalena Wojciechowska-Rysiawa BIPARTITE PSEUDO-BL ALGEBRAS

REGULAR IDENTITIES IN LATTICES

An Algebraic Proof of the Disjunction Property

The local equicontinuity of a maximal monotone operator

CHAPTER 2 BOOLEAN ALGEBRA

MV -ALGEBRAS ARE CATEGORICALLY EQUIVALENT TO A CLASS OF DRl 1(i) -SEMIGROUPS. (Received August 27, 1997)

On finite congruence-simple semirings

Definition: A binary relation R from a set A to a set B is a subset R A B. Example:

Maximal antipodal subgroups of the compact Lie group G 2 of exceptional type

The Morozov-Jacobson Theorem on 3-dimensional Simple Lie Subalgebras

DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATIC EDUCATION MATHEMATIC AND NATURAL SCIENCE FACULTY

Section Summary. Relations and Functions Properties of Relations. Combining Relations

RESIDUATION SUBREDUCTS OF POCRIGS

MOMENT CONVERGENCE RATES OF LIL FOR NEGATIVELY ASSOCIATED SEQUENCES

Fields and Galois Theory. Below are some results dealing with fields, up to and including the fundamental theorem of Galois theory.

SUPER-LUKASIEWICZ IMPLICATIONAL LOGICS YUICHI KOMORI

Transcription:

Discussiones Mathematicae ser. Algebra and Stochastic Methods 15 (1995), 81 85 On atoms in BCC-algebras Wies law A. DUDEK and Xiaohong ZHANG Abstract We characterize the the set of all atoms of a BCC-algebra and prove that a BCC-algebra which contains only atoms is a BCK-algebra. 1. Introduction. By an algebra G = (G,, 0) we mean a non-empty set G togeter with a binary multiplication and a some distinguished element 0. In the sequel a multiplication will be denoted by juxtaposition. Dots we use only to avoid repetitions of brackets. For example, the formula ((x y) (z y)) (x z) = 0 will be writen as (xy zy) xz = 0. An algebra (G,, 0) is called a BCC-algebra if it satisfies the following axioms: (1) (xy zy) xz = 0, (2) xx = 0, (3) 0x = 0, (4) x0 = x, (5) xy = yx = 0 implies x = y. The above definition is a dual form of the ordinary definition (cf. [1], [5], [6]). In our convention any BCK-algebra is a BCC-algebra, but there are BCC-algebras which are not BCK-algebras (cf. [2]). Such BCCalgebras are called proper. In [2] is proved that a BCC-algebra is a BCKalgebra iff it satisfies the identity (6) xy z = xz y. Methods of construction BCC-algebras from BCK-algebras are given in [3]. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 06 F 35, 03 G 25. Key words and phrases: BCC-algebra, BCK-algebra, atom. 81

If (G,, 0) is a BCC-algebra, then the relation defined on G by (7) x y iff xy = 0 is a partial order on G with 0 as a smallest element (cf. [2]). Moreover, this relation has the following properties (8) xy zy xz, (9) x y implies xz yz and zy zx. A non-empty subset A of a BCC-algebra G is called a BCK-ideal of G iff 0 A and y, xy A imply x A. A subset B of G is called a BCC-ideal (cf. [4]) iff 0 B and y, xy z B imply xz B. Obviously any BCC-ideal is a BCK-ideal and induces a congruence on a BCC-algebra (cf. [4]), but there are congruences which are not induced by such ideals. In BCK-algebras BCK-ideals are BCC-ideals. 2. Atoms. A non-zero element a G is called an atom of a BCC-algebra G if x a implies x = 0 or x = a. Lemma 1. A non-zero element a G is an atom of G if {0, a} is a BCK-ideal. The converse is not true. Indeed, in a proper BCC-algebra defined by the following table 0 a b c 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 b b a 0 0 c c b b 0 an element a is an atom, but {0, a} is not a BCK-ideal. Lemma 2. If every non-zero element of a BCC-algebra G is an atom, then any subalgebra of G is a BCK-ideal. Proof. Let S be a subalgebra and let x, yx S. Since yx y for all x, y G (cf. [2]) and y is an atom of G, then yx = 0 or y = yx S. If yx = 0, then y x which gives y = 0 or y = x. Thus y S, which completes the proof. From the above lammas we obtain Theorem 3. A BCC-algebra contains only atoms iff every its subalgebra is a BCK-ideal. 82

Lemma 4. If a b are atoms, then ab = a. Now we consider the set Z(G) = {z G : zx y = zy x for all x, y G}. Obviously, 0 Z(G). Lemma 5. If a Z(G), then a ax x for all x G. Indeed, (a ax)x = ax ax = 0. Theorem 6. Z(G) is a BCK-subalgebra of G. Proof. Let a, b Z(G), x, y G. Then ab (ab y) = ab (ay b) a ay y by (8) and Lemma 5. This, by (9) and (8) gives (ab x)y (ab x)(ab (ab y) = (ax b)(a(ab y) b) ax a(ab y) = a(a(ab y)) x (ab y)x, since a(a(ab y)) ab y by Lemma 5. Thus (ab x)y (ab y)x, which by symmetry gives (ab x)y = (ab y)x. Hence ab Z(G), i.e. Z(G) is a BCC-subalgebra. It is also a BCK-subalgebra because by the definition of Z(G) xy z = xz y for all x, y, z G. Let A(G) denotes the set of all atoms (together with 0) of a BCCalgebra G. Theorem 7. A(G) is a BCK-subalgebra contained in Z(G). Proof. A(G) is non-empty, because 0 G. By Lemma 4 it is also closed with respect to the BCC-operation. We prove A(G) Z(G). Let a A(G). Then for x, y G we have the following four cases: 1 0 a x and a y, 2 0 a x and not(a y), 3 0 not(a x) and a y, 4 0 not(a x) and not(a y). If a x then obviously ax y = 0 for every y G. If not(a x), then ax = a since ax a (by Proposition 2 in [2]) and ax 0. Thus in the case 1 0 we obtain ax y = 0 = ay x, i.e. a Z(G). In the case 2 0 we have ax y = 0 and ay x = ax = 0, which gives ax y = ay x. The case 3 0 is analogous. In the case 4 0 ax y = a = ay x. Hence in any case we obtain ax y = ay x, which proves that A(G) is contained in Z(G). Corollary 8. If all non-zero elements of a given BCC-algebra are atoms then it is a BCK-algebra. As a simple consequence of Lemma 4 we obtain Corollary 9. For any cardinal n 2 there exists only one BCCalgebra in which all non-zero elements are atoms. 83

By Theorem 3 we obtain also Corollary 10. Every subalgebra of a BCK-algebra is an BCK-ideal iff every non-zero element of this BCK-algebra is an atom. Finally we note that if a BCK-algebra G has at least one non-atom element, then A(G) Z(G) = G. On the other hand, in some BCCalgebras A(G) = Z(G) G. As an example we consider the algebra G = {0, a, b, c, d, e} defined by the table 0 a b c d e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 a b b b 0 0 a a c c b a 0 a a d d d d d 0 a e e e e e e 0 Since S = {0, a, b, c, d} is a proper BCC-algebra (cf. Table 2 in [1]), then G is a proper BCC-algebra by Proposition 4 in [2] (cf. also Construction 3 in [3]). In this BCC-algebra A(G) = Z(G) = {0, a, e}, but in a subalgebra S we have A(S) = {0, a} = Z(S) = {0, a, d}. Moreover, A(G) is not a BCK-ideal, but A(S) is a BCK-ideal of S and G. Obviously S is a BCC-ideal of G. Note also that Z(S) is not a maximal BCK-subalgebra of S since it not contains a BCK-subalgebra B = {0, a, b}. References [1 ] W.A.Dudek: The number of subalgebras of finite BCC-algebras, Bull. Inst. Math. Academia Sinica, 20(1992), 129-136. [2 ] W.A.Dudek: On proper BCC-algebras, Bull. Inst. Math. Academia Sinica 20(1992), 137-150. [3 ] W.A.Dudek: On constructions of BCC-algebras, Selected Papers on BCK- and BCI-algebras, 1(1992), 93-96. [4 ] W.A.Dudek and X.H.Zhang: On ideals and congruences in BCCalgebras, (to appear). [5 ] Y.Komori: The variety generated by BCC-algebras is finitelly based, Reports Fac. Sci. Shizuoka Univ. 17(1983), 13-16. [6 ] Y.Komori: The class of BCC-algebras is not a variety, Math. Japonica 29(1984), 391-394. 84

Wies law A. Dudek Xiaohong Zhang Institute of Mathematics Department of Mathematics Technical University Hanzhong Teachers College Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27 Hanzhong, Shaanxi Province 50-370 Wroc law Peoples Republic of China Poland e-mail: dudek@math.im.pwr.wroc.pl. 85