The Position Representation in Quantum Mechanics

Similar documents
Physics 221A Fall 2010 Notes 1 The Mathematical Formalism of Quantum Mechanics

Continuous quantum states, Particle on a line and Uncertainty relations

Lecture 4: Equations of motion and canonical quantization Read Sakurai Chapter 1.6 and 1.7

1 Mathematical preliminaries

1 Planck-Einstein Relation E = hν

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND TYPOS (send to

Wave Mechanics Relevant sections in text: , 2.1

1 Position Representation of Quantum State Function

Lecture 6. Four postulates of quantum mechanics. The eigenvalue equation. Momentum and energy operators. Dirac delta function. Expectation values

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

Quantum Mechanics II

Physics 221A Fall 2017 Notes 1 The Mathematical Formalism of Quantum Mechanics

Angular Momentum - set 1

Physics 215 Quantum Mechanics 1 Assignment 5

Lecture Notes 2: Review of Quantum Mechanics

8.04 Quantum Physics Lecture IV. ψ(x) = dkφ (k)e ikx 2π

C/CS/Phys 191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell I 10/04/05 Fall 2005 Lecture 11

8.04 Spring 2013 March 12, 2013 Problem 1. (10 points) The Probability Current

Lecture 8. 1 Uncovering momentum space 1. 2 Expectation Values of Operators 4. 3 Time dependence of expectation values 6

Supplementary information I Hilbert Space, Dirac Notation, and Matrix Mechanics. EE270 Fall 2017

Linear Algebra in Hilbert Space

Chemistry 432 Problem Set 4 Spring 2018 Solutions

Q U A N T U M M E C H A N I C S : L E C T U R E 5

Review of the Formalism of Quantum Mechanics

Notes on Quantum Mechanics

8.05 Quantum Physics II, Fall 2011 FINAL EXAM Thursday December 22, 9:00 am -12:00 You have 3 hours.

Quantum Mechanics: Postulates

Statistical Interpretation

Chemistry 532 Problem Set 7 Spring 2012 Solutions

Physics 505 Homework No. 1 Solutions S1-1

MATH4104: Quantum nonlinear dynamics. Lecture Two. Review of quantum theory.

Can we derive Newton s F = ma from the SE?

8.05, Quantum Physics II, Fall 2013 TEST Wednesday October 23, 12:30-2:00pm You have 90 minutes.

Quantum Mechanics I Physics 5701

Physics 443, Solutions to PS 2

Physics 221A Fall 2010 Notes 4 Spatial Degrees of Freedom

5.61 FIRST HOUR EXAM ANSWERS Fall, 2013

Quantum Mechanics I, Sheet 1, Spring 2015

PY 351 Modern Physics - Lecture notes, 3

Quantum Electrodynamics Test

Columbia University Department of Physics QUALIFYING EXAMINATION

Basic Postulates of Quantum Mechanics

PHYS-454 The position and momentum representations

Lecture 10: Solving the Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation. 1 Stationary States 1. 2 Solving for Energy Eigenstates 3

Time dependent Schrodinger equation

Lecture 7. More dimensions

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics PVK - Solutions. Nicolas Lanzetti

-state problems and an application to the free particle

Lecture 12. The harmonic oscillator

16.1. PROBLEM SET I 197

Lecture #5: Begin Quantum Mechanics: Free Particle and Particle in a 1D Box

5.4 Given the basis e 1, e 2 write the matrices that represent the unitary transformations corresponding to the following changes of basis:

1 References 2. 2 Formalisms of classical and quantum mechanics Setup of classical mechanics... 2

Mathematical Tripos Part IB Michaelmas Term Example Sheet 1. Values of some physical constants are given on the supplementary sheet

BASICS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS. Reading: QM Course packet Ch 5

Lecture 5 (Sep. 20, 2017)

Formalism of Quantum Mechanics

in terms of the classical frequency, ω = , puts the classical Hamiltonian in the form H = p2 2m + mω2 x 2

Lorentz Invariance and Second Quantization

We do not derive F = ma; we conclude F = ma by induction from. a large series of observations. We use it as long as its predictions agree

E = hν light = hc λ = ( J s)( m/s) m = ev J = ev

Page 684. Lecture 40: Coordinate Transformations: Time Transformations Date Revised: 2009/02/02 Date Given: 2009/02/02

Problems and Multiple Choice Questions

1.1 Quantum mechanics of one particle

8.04: Quantum Mechanics Professor Allan Adams Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Problem Set 2. Due Thursday Feb 21 at 11.00AM

( ) = 9φ 1, ( ) = 4φ 2.

1 Fundamental physical postulates. C/CS/Phys C191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell I 10/04/07 Fall 2007 Lecture 12

Quantum Physics (PHY-4215)

Exercises : Questions

Ch 125a Problem Set 1

PHYS Handout 6

Quantum Chemistry Exam 2 Solutions

Mathematical Introduction

Exam in TFY4205 Quantum Mechanics Saturday June 10, :00 13:00

Quantum Mechanics. L. Del Debbio, University of Edinburgh Version 0.9

Quantum Mechanics is Linear Algebra. Noah Graham Middlebury College February 25, 2014

Physics 342 Lecture 17. Midterm I Recap. Lecture 17. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I

MATH325 - QUANTUM MECHANICS - SOLUTION SHEET 11

Each problem is worth 34 points. 1. Harmonic Oscillator Consider the Hamiltonian for a simple harmonic oscillator. 2ml 2 0. d 2

C/CS/Phys C191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell 10/06/07 Fall 2009 Lecture 12

The Simple Harmonic Oscillator

Chapter 2 Heisenberg s Matrix Mechanics

Quantum Physics 130A. April 1, 2006

Quantum Theory and Group Representations

Physics 443, Solutions to PS 1 1

Conventions for fields and scattering amplitudes

Physics 217 Problem Set 1 Due: Friday, Aug 29th, 2008

Quantum dynamics with non-hermitian PT -symmetric operators: Models

1 Infinite-Dimensional Vector Spaces

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 16 Bloch s Theorem and Band Structure in One Dimension

Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics as a Gauge Theory

1 The postulates of quantum mechanics

PHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008.

3 Schroedinger Equation

C/CS/Phys C191 Particle-in-a-box, Spin 10/02/08 Fall 2008 Lecture 11

Lecture 4 (Sep. 18, 2017)

Simple one-dimensional potentials

Physics 143a - Quantum Mechanics I

4. Supplementary Notes on Time and Space Evolution of a Neutrino Beam

CHAPTER 1. SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS

Transcription:

The Position Representation in Quantum Mechanics Sungwook Lee Department of Mathematics University of Southern Mississippi sunglee@usm.edu July 13, 2007 The x-coordinate of a particle is associated with an operator ˆx. The set of numbers that are eigenvalues of an operator is called the spectrum of the operator. The spectrum of ˆx consists of real numbers < x <. x is the state in which the particle is certainly at x and satisfies the eigenvalue equation ˆx x = x x. If the particle is in some state ψ, the amplitude to find the particle at x is the complex number x ψ. The functional dependence of this number on x is what is called the wave function ψ(x): ψ(x) = x ψ. Since the particle has to be somewhere, the sum of the probabilities ψ(x) 2 has to be 1. Since the values of x is continuous, 1 = dx ψ(x) 2 = dx ψ x x ψ. (1) In discrete case, if ψ n, n = 1, 2, denote eigenkets, then ψ = ψ n ψ n ψ. n=1 So, n=1 ψ n ψ n = I. Similarly, from (1) we obtain dx x x = I. (2) By (2), x ψ = dx x x x ψ. (3) 1

Recall that the Dirac delta function is defined by ψ(x ) = dxδ(x x )ψ(x). Compare this with (3), we get If φ and ψ are two states, then 1 by (2) φ ψ = dx φ x x ψ = dxφ (x)ψ(x). x x = δ(x x ). (4) In the position representation, the functional form ψ( ) is identified with the state ψ and the complex number ψ(x) with the amplitude x ψ. Now, let us calculate x ˆx ψ. First we assume that ˆx is hermitian, i.e., (ˆx) = ˆx as usual in quantum mechanics. x ˆx ψ = (ˆx) x ψ = ˆxx ψ = x x ψ = xψ(x). This calculation also can be done without assuming that ˆx is hermitian: x ˆx ψ = x ˆx I ψ = = = = = xψ(x). dx x ˆx x x ψ dx x ˆxx ψ(x ) dxx δ(x x )ψ(x ) dxδ(x x )x ψ(x ) 1 Here, we consider only 1-dimensional case, so φ (x) = φ(x). 2

Hence, the operator ˆx turns ψ that evaluates ψ(x) into the one that evaluates xψ(x). In the position representation, x-momentum p operates on wave functions by differentiation 2 : h x ˆp ψ = x ˆpψ = ˆpψ(x) = i ψ. = 1.055 10 34 J s is the Dirac constant or the reduced Planck constant, where h 6.626 10 34 J s is the Planck constant. Let u p (x) := x p. Then x ˆp p = x ˆpp = i u p = pu p (x), since ˆp p = p p. That is, we obtain the differential equation i u p = pu p. The differential equation has a general solution u p (x) = Ae ipx/. The unknown constant A can be determined as follows: δ(p p ) = p p = dx p x x p = dxu p (x)u p(x) = A 2 dxe i(p p )x/ = A 2 δ(p p ). 1 Here, we used the familiar integral dte ixt = δ(x) in Fourier transforms. Recall that this integral came from the sequence of functions δ n (x) = sin nx πx = 1 n n dte ixt, n = 1, 2, 2 For now, we will take it as a definition, but it will be proved later. 3

which approximates the Dirac delta function δ(x), i.e., δ(x) lim n δ n(x) = 1 Since A > 0, A = 1. Hence, dte ixt. Figure 1: The sequence δ n (x) u p (x) = 1 e ipx/. This is the wave function of a state of momentum. In physics, the hamiltonian H plays an important role in the study of dynamics. It is given by H = T + V, where T and V are the kinetic energy and the potential energy, respectively. The hamiltonian H represents the energy of a physical system. The kinetic energy is given by T = p2 2m where p is the momentum. So, the hamiltonian can be written as H(p, x) = p2 2m + V (x). 4

A typical classical example is the hamiltonian for a harmonic oscillator: H(p, x) = p2 2m + 1 2 mω2 x 2. In the position representation, the hamiltonian for a particle acts by a combination of differentiation and multiplications: x H ψ = x Hψ = Hψ(x) ( = 2 ) 2m 2 + V (x) ψ(x). For a single particle moving along a real line R, there are two important observables: position and momentum. As we discussed earlier, in the quantum mechanical description of such a particle, the position operator ˆx and momentum operator ˆp are respectively given by x ˆx ψ = xψ(x), (5) x ˆp ψ = i ψ(x). (6) Now, we prove (6). This is what Larry Mead taught me 3. Let H be a Hilbert space of states. Suppose that O is a hermitian operator 4 on H such that the unitary operator g(a) = e ioa/, < a < satisfies the property: g(a)ψ(x) = ψ(x + a). (7) That is, g(a) gives rise to a translation of ψ(x) along the real line. unitary operator g(a) = e ioa/ acts on ψ(x) as 5 e ioa/ ψ(x) = (1 + = ψ(x) + ia ) ia a2 O 2! 2 O2 + ψ(x) Oψ(x) a2 2! 2 O2 ψ(x) +. The 3 If there is any misleading in the following argument, it is solely due to my misunderstanding on the material. 4 Let G be the group of unitary operators on a Hilbert space H and O a hermitian operator on H. Then {e ioa/ : a R} is a one-parameter (sub)group of G. 5 Here O 2 means the function composition O O. 5

Let x denote the position operator and δa denote infinitesimal change of a, so that (δa) n can be neglected for n 2. For any wave function ψ(x), Thus, On the other hand, e ioδa/ xe ioδa/ ψ(x) = e ioδa/ xψ(x δa) e ioδa/ xe ioδa/ = = (x + δa)ψ(x). e ioδa/ xe ioδa/ = x + δa. (8) ( 1 + iδa ) ( O x 1 iδa ) O = x iδa [x, O], where [x, O] = xo Ox is the canonical commutator. From (8) and (9), we obtain x + δa = x iδa [x, O]. This implies [x, O] = i. (10) Let a R. From (7) one obtains (9) ψ(x) 2 = ψ(x + a) 2. (11) So, one may consider the complex-valued function ψ(x) itself as a periodic function, and a simple candidate for ψ(x) satisfying (11) can be ψ(x) = e ikx. Note that k is the wave number k = λ, where λ is the wave length. Using the de Broglie s formula p = h λ, one obtains p = k or k = p. Hence, ψ(x) = e ipx/. (12) The wave function in (12) may be regarded as x p, i.e., ψ(x) = x p and ψ (x) = p x. Since ˆp p = p p, On the other hand, x ˆp p = p x p = pψ(x). (13) x ˆp p = xˆp I p = dx x ˆp x x p = dx ˆp x ψ(x ). (14) 6

From (13) and (14), one obtains dx x ˆp x e ipx / = pe ipx/. By Fourier transform 6, x ˆp x = This implies that = i dp / e ipx pe ipx/ dp eip(x x )/. = i δ(x x ). ψ ˆp ψ = ψ I ˆp I ψ = dx dx ψ x x ˆp x x ψ [ = dx dx ψ (x) i ] δ(x x ) ψ(x ) ( = dxψ (x) i ) dx δ(x x )ψ(x ) ( = dxψ (x) i ) ψ(x). Since ψ ˆp ψ = dxψ (x)ˆpψ(x), we see that ˆp = i. (15) Let us write the momentum operator ˆp simply as p. Then for any wave then 6 Recall that if φ(k) = 1 ψ(x) = 1 dxe ikx ψ(x), dke ikx φ(k) and vice versa. 7

function ψ(x), Hence, [x, p]ψ(x) = xpψ(x) pxψ(x) ( = x i ψ(x) ) + i ψ(x) = i ψ(x). [x, p] = i. (16) That is, the momentum operator p satisfies the commutation relation (10). Clearly, e ipa/ ψ(x) = e ipa/ e ipx/ = e ip(x+a)/ = ψ(x + a). Therefore, the momentum operator p = i is the desired operator O. 8