Chapter 7: Reflection Seismology Homework Solutions (Jan. 2010)

Similar documents
Introducción a la Geofísica

ERTH2020 Introduction to Geophysics The Seismic Method. 1. Basic Concepts in Seismology. 1.1 Seismic Wave Types

PART A: Short-answer questions (50%; each worth 2%)

Mandatory Assignment 2013 INF-GEO4310

Reflection Seismic Method

A Petroleum Geologist's Guide to Seismic Reflection

Seismic reflection notes

Elements of 3D Seismology Second Edition

Near-Surface Seismic Reflection Applications

Amplitude variation with offset AVO. and. Direct Hydrocarbon Indicators DHI. Reflection at vertical incidence. Reflection at oblique incidence

The seismic response to strong vertical velocity change

Seismic tests at Southern Ute Nation coal fire site

P Wave Reflection and Refraction and SH Wave Refraction Data Processing in the Mooring, TN Area

PRELIMINARY REPORT. Evaluations of to what extent CO 2 accumulations in the Utsira formations are possible to quantify by seismic by August 1999.

Hydrogeophysics - Seismics

EOS 350 MIDTERM OCT 4, 2013 STUDENT NAME: TEAM #:

Attenuation of Multiples in Marine Seismic Data. Geology /23/06

The Solid Earth Chapter 4 Answers to selected questions. (1) Love waves involve transverse motion, generally arrive before Rayleigh waves.

Modelling Class 1 AVO responses of a three layer system

ANGLE-DEPENDENT TOMOSTATICS. Abstract

Land seismic sources

P137 Our Experiences of 3D Synthetic Seismic Modeling with Tip-wave Superposition Method and Effective Coefficients

Rock Physics and Quantitative Wavelet Estimation. for Seismic Interpretation: Tertiary North Sea. R.W.Simm 1, S.Xu 2 and R.E.

Reservoir Characterization using AVO and Seismic Inversion Techniques

Seismic applications in coalbed methane exploration and development

Th Guided Waves - Inversion and Attenuation

Hydrocarbon Fluid Wave and it's resonance G.K. Batta*, D.S. Manral, G.V.J. Rao, and S.K. Basha, Oil India limited, India

INTRODUCTION TO APPLIED GEOPHYSICS

FINAL REPORT GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION WATER TOWER NO. 6 SITE PLANT CITY, FL

Th P7 02 A Method to Suppress Salt-related Converted Wave Using 3D Acoustic Modelling

FUNDAMENTALS OF SEISMIC EXPLORATION FOR HYDROCARBON

PTRT 1473: Exploration and Production II. Chapter 3: Exploration

Seismologia A Seismology A Lecture 9: Engineering seismology: seismic veloci:es in soils

Tim Carr - West Virginia University

P125 AVO for Pre-Resonant and Resonant Frequency Ranges of a Periodical Thin-Layered Stack

SEISMIC REFRACTION ANALYSIS OF EAST RIVER FLATS MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA AUTUMN HAAGSMA

Basic principles of the seismic method

Application of Seismic Reflection Surveys to Detect Massive Sulphide Deposits in Sediments-Hosted Environment

Seismic Reflection Profiling: An Effective Exploration Tool in the Athabasca Basin? An Interim Assessment

We LHR5 03 Seismic Diffraction Response from Boreholes

Finite difference elastic modeling of the topography and the weathering layer

11th Biennial International Conference & Exposition. Keywords Sub-basalt imaging, Staggered grid; Elastic finite-difference, Full-waveform modeling.

Seismic Sources. Seismic sources. Requirements; Principles; Onshore, offshore. Reading: Telford et al., Section 4.5 Sheriff and Geldart, Chapter 7

Global geophysics and wave propagation

Sea-bottom shear-wave velocities and mode conversions

Electromagnetic Waves

Chapter 13: Exploration Techniques

Complex-beam Migration and Land Depth Tianfei Zhu CGGVeritas, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

INTEGRATED GEOPHYSICAL INTERPRETATION METHODS FOR HYDROCARBON EXPLORATION

Static Corrections for Seismic Reflection Surveys

Downloaded 09/17/13 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at Log data.

7.2.1 Seismic waves. Waves in a mass- spring system

Chapter 1. Introduction EARTH MODEL BUILDING

Summary. Introduction

Noise suppression and multiple attenuation using full-azimuth angle domain imaging: case studies

Pre-stack (AVO) and post-stack inversion of the Hussar low frequency seismic data

Subsurface Geology and Resource Exploration

Seismic Reflection Results: Stewart Gulch Region, Boise, Idaho

Notes on Huygens Principle 2000 Lawrence Rees

3D beam prestack depth migration with examples from around the world

Post-stack inversion of the Hussar low frequency seismic data

DOWN-HOLE SEISMIC SURVEY AND VERTICAL ELECTRIC SOUNDINGS RABASKA PROJECT, LÉVIS, QUÉBEC. Presented to :

Compensating visco-acoustic effects in anisotropic resverse-time migration Sang Suh, Kwangjin Yoon, James Cai, and Bin Wang, TGS

Full-Azimuth 3-D Characterizes Shales

3. Magnetic Methods / 62

Rock physics and AVO analysis for lithofacies and pore fluid prediction in a North Sea oil field

NMO residual reduction on medium anisotropy in field X using Fomel and Stovas method

An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration

Improved Imaging through Refraction Statics in a Sand Dune Area: A Case Study.

Improved Exploration, Appraisal and Production Monitoring with Multi-Transient EM Solutions

Key Words: seismic method, fractured reservoir, Larderello field ABSTRACT

Geophysical Site Investigation (Seismic methods) Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar

Downhole Seismic Velocity Logging Test

Seismic Inversion on 3D Data of Bassein Field, India

The failure of the sounding assumption in electroseismic investigations

Research Project Report

a. The distance from a shot point in which no refracted energy is recorded is termed the.

Relationship between head wave amplitudes and seismic refraction velocities to detect lateral variation in the refractor

Imaging complex structure with crosswell seismic in Jianghan oil field

THE BETTER SUBSURFACE IMAGING USING A QUALITY SEISMIC PROCESSING

Seismic modeling evaluation of fault illumination in the Woodford Shale Sumit Verma*, Onur Mutlu, Kurt J. Marfurt, The University of Oklahoma

An investigation of the free surface effect

Improving Resolution with Spectral Balancing- A Case study

J.A. Haugen* (StatoilHydro ASA), J. Mispel (StatoilHydro ASA) & B. Arntsen (NTNU)

Walkaway Seismic Experiments: Stewart Gulch, Boise, Idaho

Shallow P and S velocity structure, Red Deer, Alberta

Physics 30: Chapter 5 Exam Wave Nature of Light

4. What is the speed (in cm s - 1 ) of the tip of the minute hand?

The i-stats: An Image-Based Effective-Medium Modeling of Near-Surface Anomalies Oz Yilmaz*, GeoTomo LLC, Houston, TX

INTRODUCTION TO LOGGING TOOLS

Estimating received sound levels at the seafloor beneath seismic survey sources

The exploding-reflector concept for ground-penetrating-radar modeling

GEOPHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION IN SUPPORT OF HIGHWAY EXPANSION PROJECT

A Case Study on Simulation of Seismic Reflections for 4C Ocean Bottom Seismometer Data in Anisotropic Media Using Gas Hydrate Model

FloatSeis Technologies for Ultra-Deep Imaging Seismic Surveys

Unphysical negative values of the anelastic SH plane wave energybased transmission coefficient

SEISMIC SURVEYS FOR IMAGING THE REGOLITH

Borehole Seismic Monitoring of Injected CO 2 at the Frio Site

DE128. Seismic Inversion Techniques. H.H. Sheik Sultan Tower (0) Floor Corniche Street Abu Dhabi U.A.E

We apply a rock physics analysis to well log data from the North-East Gulf of Mexico

Transcription:

Chapter 7: eflection Seismology Homework Solutions (Jan. 200). Why do marine seismic reflection surveys not record (a) S waves? (b) refracted rays? 2 μ a) For ideal fluid, μ=0, thus, v s = = 0 ρ b) eflection offsets by definition are at offset le than the critical refraction distance 2. How does a migrated reflection seismic section differ from an unmigrated one? In what circumstances would they be the same? Migration is the spatial repositioning (migration) of seismic arrivals from the initial aumption that the arrivals come from flat and continuous layers. Migrations do three primary things: a) steepens dipping layers, b) collapses diffractions, c) moves reflectors to deeper levels. They would be the same if the layers (interfaces) are flat and continuous. 3. How can a primary reflection be distinguished from a multiple one? Multiple reflections have greater temporal moveout compared to primary reflections. Thus, multiples stack with a lower velocity. 4. Will a migrated section correct for sideswipe? Sideswipe is due to 3 dimensional effects that contaminate a 2 D migration. The only way to account for sideswipe is to do a fully 3 D migration. 5. Is the dip of a reflector in an unmigrated seismic section more or le than its actual dip? Explain with the aid of a sketch. Unmigrated apparent dips are le than the true migrated dips. This is because the deeper reflection migration arcs have a radius of curvature that is larger than the shallower migration arcs and consequently have a larger depth correction.

6. What is the main way in which the Vibroseis system differs from other data acquisition systems? Name two advantages that it has over other methods of land surveying. The source is a frequency sweep (chirp). Advantages: (a) Allows better matching of recorded data because the entire pulse can be correlated. (b) equired energy is lower which is beneficial for non invasive surveys. (c) Trucks can be moved in and out without drilling. 7. areflected What are ρ the main purposes of stacking? 2v2 ρv = = a incident ρ2 v 2 ρ v Stacking is the seismic equivalent of averaging numbers to improve one s estimate of the quantity. Stacking constructively adds together the signal, while the random noise tends to cancel, thereby increasing the signal to noise ratio. 8. How can a reflection coefficient be negative? How can it be recognized? The sign of the reflection coefficient depends on the seismic impedence difference between the lower layer (auming downgoing wave) and the upper layer. areflected ρ v ρv = = a ρ v ρ v incident 2 2 2 2 Thus, if Z2 = ρ2v2 > Z = ρv, then >0. If Z2 = ρ2v2 < Z = ρv, then <0. The way that a negative reflection coefficient is manifested in a seismogram, is that the wave is inverted. 9. How many synclines and anticlines appear in an unmigrated seismic section? It depends on the individual seismic section! Would have to study a section to identify them. Anticlines appear spatially broader on an unmigrated section. The signature of a syncline depends on its depth relative to its curvature. If it is shallower than the radius of curvature, it tends to be narrower on the unmigrated section. If the reflector is deeper than the radius of curvature, it produces the bow tie on the unmigrated section. 2

0. A succeion consists of alternating sandstones and shales, with the top layer being sandstone. Calculate how the amplitude diminishes for reflections from each of the top four interfaces (ignore spreading of the wavefront and absorption), if the densities and velocities are as follows: sandstone ρ=2mg/m 3, v=2.6 km/s; shale ρ=2.3 Mg/m 3, v=2.8 km/s. 2v2 v 2 v ρ = ρ T = ρ ρ v ρ v ρ v ρ v 2 2 2 2 T T ρ2v2 ρv 2ρv = T = ρ v ρ v ρ v ρ v, sh, sh sh, sh, 2 2 2 2 and T for 'over' sh ( 2.3)( 2.8) ( 2.0)( 2.6) ( 2)( 2.0)( 2.6) ρshvsh ρv = = ρshvsh ρv = 0.06 2ρv = = ρ v ρ v = 0.893 sh sh and T for sh 'over' ( 2.0)( 2.6) ( 2.3)( 2.8) ( 2)( 2.3)( 2.8) ρv ρshvsh = = = 0.06 ρ v ρ v sh sh 2ρv = = =.06 ρ v ρ v sh sh eflection coefficients (effective) = = 0.06 = ( sh )( sh )( sh ) ( )( )( ) = ( sh )( sh )( sh )( sh )( sh ) T T 2,,, T T T T 3,,,,, ( )( )( )( )( ) = 0.893 0.06.06 = 0.05 = 0.893.06 0.06 0.893.06 = 0.03 ( sh )( sh )( sh )( sh )( sh )( sh )( sh ) = T T T T T T 4,,,,,,, ( )( )( )( )( )( )( ) = 0.893.06 0.893 0.06.06 0.893.06 = 0.02 3

. Seismic sections are not always what they appear. Explain how an apparent reflector may (a) have an incorrect slope, (b) may have an incorrect curvature, or (c) may not exist at all, while (d) three horizontal reflectors spaced equally one above the other may not be equqlly spaced, in reality? (a) Unmigrated sections have leer dips. (b) Synclines (concave up) and anticlines (concave down) will have their curvatures modified in unmigrated sections. (c) Multiple reflections can produce an apparent reflector 2( thickne) (d) The scale on a seismic section is TWT, not distance. TWT =, hence, velocity variations in the combination of thickne and velocity can make it appear that they are equally spaced, when in reality, they are only equally spaced in TWT. 2. What determines vertical resolution? Why does le than the required resolution sometimes have to be accepted? For all waves (elastic, electromagnetic, etc), the spatial resolution increases with higher v frequencies that have smaller wavelengths ( λ = ). A typical reflection survey has a f frequency of 40 Hz and a velocity of 5 km/s, hence the wavelength of 25 meters, and a quarter wavelength of approximately 3.2 meters. Because higher frequencies have more attenuation (diipated energy), they don t travel as far in depth. Thus, if we want to look for deep reflectors, we must settle for looking for large layers as well. 3. Explain why a reflector on a seismic section need not correspond to a particular interface. When layers are thinner than a quarter wavelength, the reflections and transmitted waves can interfere causing waves that don t necearily correspond with a real reflector. 4. Why is a very strong horizontal reflection usually indicative of a gas water interface? Why may a gas water interface not always appear as a horizontal reflector? Because the acoustic impedance of a gas liquid is very different than the surrounding rock, it can produce a bright spot on a section. Since gas liquid is generally le dense than the surrounding rock, it will tend to move upward until it reaches an impermeable boundary, which is often horizontal. However, traps can exist that are not horizontal, therefore the interface may not always be horizontal 4

5. A strong reflector that lies below several layers with different seismic velocities has the same TWT as the base of a single layer elsewhere. What do the total thicknees above the two reflectors have in common? The total thicknees above the reflector would have to have the same MS velocity to have the same TWT to the reflector. 6. Explain why a seismic interface may not be a lithological boundary, and vice versa. Give an example of each. A seismic interface may be an artifact from reflective interference of several layers. An example is alternating layers of sandstone and shale, which can produce spurious reflectors. A lithologic boundary may not produce a seismic reflector because the combination of density and velocity (impedance) may not be such as to produce a significant reflector even though they are distinctly different. An example is given in section 7.8. with the example of sandstone and limestone. 7. In what ways does shallow seismic land surveying differ from deep surveying? Shallow land surveys require higher resolution, hence high frequency sources and receivers that can detect the higher frequencies., typically up to around 400 Hz. 8. A thin, horizontal layer of shale (v p = 2.8 km/sec) lies within sandstone (v p = 2.5 km/sec). What is the minimum thickne of shale that can be resolved in a Vibroseis survey? (Use an average frequency.) Use an average frequency of 50 Hz. 3 v 2.8 0 λ = = = 56 meters f 50 λ 56 esolution = = = 4 meters 4 4 9. Explain how (a) an interface may show up by seismic reflection, but not by seismic refraction, and (b) vice versa? a) : Source receiver distance le than the critical distance.. 2: A thin hidden layer will poibly be visible on reflection, but not on refraction. 3: A low velocity layer is present therefore no critical angle, hence no refracted wave. b) A gradual interface can be seen with refraction, but not with reflection 5