Generation of Glauber Coherent State Superpositions via Unitary Transformations

Similar documents
Symmetries and Supersymmetries in Trapped Ion Hamiltonian Models

in terms of the classical frequency, ω = , puts the classical Hamiltonian in the form H = p2 2m + mω2 x 2

2 Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 21 Jun 2002

PHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008.

Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from?

Physics 581, Quantum Optics II Problem Set #4 Due: Tuesday November 1, 2016

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 16 Bloch s Theorem and Band Structure in One Dimension

Statistical Interpretation

arxiv:atom-ph/ v1 15 Mar 1996

Deformation of the `embedding'

FIG. 16: A Mach Zehnder interferometer consists of two symmetric beam splitters BS1 and BS2

Physics 70007, Fall 2009 Answers to Final Exam

Quantum Theory and Group Representations

Creation and Destruction Operators and Coherent States

Cavity losses for the dissipative Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian beyond Rotating Wave Approximation arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 11 Sep 2007

Introduction to Circuit QED Lecture 2

Entropy for the Quantized Field in the Atom-Field Interaction: Initial Thermal Distribution

Quantum Mechanics - I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Theoretical design of a readout system for the Flux Qubit-Resonator Rabi Model in the ultrastrong coupling regime

Lecture 1: Introduction to QFT and Second Quantization

Page 404. Lecture 22: Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 2008/11/19 Date Revised: 2008/11/19

Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space

Lecture 12. The harmonic oscillator

Implementing the quantum random walk

Raising & Lowering; Creating & Annihilating

Lorentz Invariance and Second Quantization

Optional Problems on the Harmonic Oscillator

Attempts at relativistic QM

5.4 Given the basis e 1, e 2 write the matrices that represent the unitary transformations corresponding to the following changes of basis:

Nonclassical properties and generation of superposition state of excited coherent states of motion of trapped ion

8.04 Spring 2013 March 12, 2013 Problem 1. (10 points) The Probability Current

Quantization of the E-M field

PY 351 Modern Physics - Lecture notes, 3

NANOSCALE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Harmonic Oscillator. Robert B. Griffiths Version of 5 December Notation 1. 3 Position and Momentum Representations of Number Eigenstates 2

Quantum Mechanics - I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Lecture - 16 The Quantum Beam Splitter

Three problems from quantum optics

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Lecture 6 Quantum Mechanical Systems and Measurements

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 20 Nov 1999

Atkins & de Paula: Atkins Physical Chemistry 9e Checklist of key ideas. Chapter 7: Quantum Theory: Introduction and Principles

Diagonal Representation of Density Matrix Using q-coherent States

One-Mode Wigner Quasi-probability. Distribution Function for Entangled Coherent. States Generated by Beam Splitter and Cavity QED

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 5

CHAPTER NUMBER 7: Quantum Theory: Introduction and Principles

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 14 Mar 1999

Ground state cooling via Sideband cooling. Fabian Flassig TUM June 26th, 2013

Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension

Quantum Mechanics - I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Lecture - 9 Introducing Quantum Optics

Coherent superposition states as quantum rulers

0.1 Schrödinger Equation in 2-dimensional system

Lecture 2: Open quantum systems

in-medium pair wave functions the Cooper pair wave function the superconducting order parameter anomalous averages of the field operators

ON POSITIVE-OPERATOR-VALUED MEASURE FOR PHASE MEASUREMENTS. Abstract. The unnormalizable Susskind-Glogower (SG) phase eigenstates, which

Second Quantization: Quantum Fields

QUANTUM MECHANICS. Franz Schwabl. Translated by Ronald Kates. ff Springer

Quantum Dynamics. March 10, 2017

Lecture 5: Harmonic oscillator, Morse Oscillator, 1D Rigid Rotor

Quantum mechanics (QM) deals with systems on atomic scale level, whose behaviours cannot be described by classical mechanics.

Quantum Harmonic Oscillator

8.05 Quantum Physics II, Fall 2011 FINAL EXAM Thursday December 22, 9:00 am -12:00 You have 3 hours.

CSCO Criterion for Entanglement and Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

PHY413 Quantum Mechanics B Duration: 2 hours 30 minutes

A coarse-grained Schrödinger cat

Quantum Mechanics C (130C) Winter 2014 Assignment 7

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 20 Jan 2011

Notes on x-ray scattering - M. Le Tacon, B. Keimer (06/2015)

Harmonic oscillator - Vibration energy of molecules

The Klein-Gordon equation

Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 2018, 5:00 pm. 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet

Two-mode excited entangled coherent states and their entanglement properties

df(x) = h(x) dx Chemistry 4531 Mathematical Preliminaries Spring 2009 I. A Primer on Differential Equations Order of differential equation

Parametric oscillator in a Kerr medium: evolution of coherent states

Scholars Research Library. Understanding the decay of atom in quantum theory of radiation using the concept of area

A Symmetric Treatment of Damped Harmonic Oscillator in Extended Phase Space

-state problems and an application to the free particle

LECTURES ON QUANTUM MECHANICS

The Dirac Equation. Topic 3 Spinors, Fermion Fields, Dirac Fields Lecture 13

Physics 741 Graduate Quantum Mechanics 1 Solutions to Midterm Exam, Fall x i x dx i x i x x i x dx

arxiv:quant-ph/ v3 19 May 1997

8.04: Quantum Mechanics Professor Allan Adams. Problem Set 7. Due Tuesday April 9 at 11.00AM

BALANCE EQUATIONS-BASED PROPERTIES OF THE RABI HAMILTONIAN

2 Canonical quantization

CHAPTER 8 The Quantum Theory of Motion

CHM 532 Notes on Creation and Annihilation Operators

Violation of the Born Rule: Implications for the Classical Electromagnetic Field. R. E. Kastner 1 16 Aprll 2016

1.1 Creation and Annihilation Operators in Quantum Mechanics

CMSC 33001: Novel Computing Architectures and Technologies. Lecture 06: Trapped Ion Quantum Computing. October 8, 2018

Paradigms in Physics: Quantum Mechanics

Control and Robustness for Quantum Linear Systems

Maxwell s equations. based on S-54. electric field charge density. current density

Quantum Mechanics: Vibration and Rotation of Molecules

Single-Mode Displacement Sensor

Angular momentum. Quantum mechanics. Orbital angular momentum

( ) ( ) ( ) Invariance Principles & Conservation Laws. = P δx. Summary of key point of argument

The Hamiltonian operator and states

Harmonic Oscillator I

1 Fundamental physical postulates. C/CS/Phys C191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell I 10/04/07 Fall 2007 Lecture 12

Quantum Mechanics II

Transcription:

Proceedings of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine 004, Vol. 50, Part, 881 885 Generation of Glauber Coherent State Superpositions via Unitary Transformations Antonino MESSINA, Benedetto MILITELLO and Anna NAPOLI INFM, MIUR and Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche ed Astronomiche dell Universitá di Palermo, Via Archirafi, 36-9013 Palermo, Italy E-mail: messina@fisica.unipa.it A unitary transformation mapping the vacuum state of a harmonic oscillator into a normalized superposition of two arbitrary Glauber coherent states is reported. Interesting features of the transformation are discussed. Generalizations to the superposition of N coherent states are discussed. 1 Introduction Since their introduction by Glauber in 1963 [1], coherent states have been deeply studied [] due to the fact that, in some sense, the statistical properties related to the first momenta of their Fock distribution exhibit features interpretable in the realm of classical probability theory. Of course the quantum nature of a coherent state, and ultimately the granularity of the energy of a quantum harmonic oscillator, becomes more and more evident when higher momenta of the Fock distribution are considered. It is of relevance that coherent states of both a mechanical quantum oscillator or a quantized mode of an electromagnetic resonator may be currently proposed in accordance with well-defined protocols. Even more interesting is the fact that they provide the effective possibility of realizing interesting experiments able to bring to the light peculiarities of quantum mechanics. In particular, the very famous gedanken Schrödinger Cat State (SCS) experiment [3] consisting in entangling a microscopic quantum object (an atom) with a macroscopic one (a cat) has been realized. No unfortunate feline has been tortured! Trapped ions have been indeed exploited. In fact, such systems provide the possibility of testing fundamental quantum physics aspects giving at experimentalist s disposal compound quantum systems consisting of a few-level atomic part and a tri-dimensional harmonic oscillator describing the center of mass motion of an ion confined into a Paul trap. Suitably acting upon the system with Raman lasers it is possible to engineer the Schrödinger Cat-like state [4, 5] ψ = 1 ( α + α + ), where ± indicate two internal atomic states and ±α are two macroscopically well distinguishable harmonic oscillator configurations, i.e. opposite Glauber coherent states. Today the definition of SCS is extended to all those situations wherein two macroscopically distinguishable classical states are quantum coherently simultaneously present [6]. Hence the purely vibrational normalized quantum superposition φ = N(α)( α + α ) (1) is referred to as a SCS. Here N(α) is the normalizing constant 1. It is worth to stress that, apart from semantic questions, the superposition in equation (1) is of relevance in the study of fundamental aspects of quantum mechanics. 1 Due to the non-orthogonality of coherent states, in most of the cases N(α) is not trivially 1.

88 A. Messina, B. Militello and A. Napoli In this paper we present, from the mathematical point of view, the construction of a new unitary operator able to generate coherent superpositions of Glauber coherent states when applied to the vibrational vacuum. In particular, dynamical configurations like that in equation (1) may be generated. The operator, initially related to the generation of two coherent states, will be generalized to the case of more than two such states. It is worth noting that, acting with such an operator upon states different from the vacuum but possessing appropriate spatial symmetries, it is possible to generate a wider class of superpositions of translated wave function. The unitary operator introduced here may be used to solve elegantly and effectively those variational problems involving superpositions of Glauber coherent states as candidate solution. Generation of coherent state superpositions The physical system we consider is a harmonic oscillator of frequency ω described by the Hamiltonian ( Ĥ = ω â â + 1 ), where â and â are the annihilation and creation operators respectively. Its eigenstates n, n being a non-negative integer, describe a spectrum having equidistant levels: Ĥ n = ω ( n + 1 ) n. It is well known that, applying a displacement operator to the vacuum state, 0, one obtains a so called Glauber coherent state α ˆD (α) 0 e α â αâ 0, where α is a complex number whose real and imaginary parts return the mean values of the position and momentum operators respectively. Observe that, since the vacuum state realizing a non-squeezed minimum position-momentum uncertainty is rigidly translated, the minimal uncertainty is preserved. Consider now the observable ˆΠ =cos ( πâ â ) which is a Hermitian and unitary operator commuting with relations: ˆΠ n =( 1) n n Ĥ and satisfying the following () and ˆΠâ ˆΠ = â, ˆΠâ ˆΠ = â. Due to equation (), ˆΠ is called Parity operator. Starting from this point we introduce the operator ˆD (α)π. It turns out that, like ˆΠ, it is both unitary, being the product of two unitary operators, and Hermitian, as easily verifiable: [ ˆD (α)π ] =ΠˆD (α) =ΠˆD ( α) =ΠˆD ( α)π = ˆD (α)π. Moreover, the square of such an operator is the Identity. Indeed [ ˆD (α)π ] = ˆD (α)πˆd (α)π= ˆD (α) ˆD ( α) =ˆ1. (3)

Generation of Glauber Coherent State Superpositions 883 Taking into account all such properties, we define the following two-parameter unitary operator: Û (λ, α) e iλ ˆD(α)Π, (4) λ being a real number. In consideration of equation (3), Û (λ, α) may be cast in the form ( ) k iλ ˆD (α)π Û (λ, α) k! (iλ) k = (k)! ˆ1+ (iλ) k+1 (α)π (5) (k +1)!ˆD and finally Û (λ, α) =cosλ ˆ1+i sin λ ˆD (α)π. (6) The action of such an operator on a state we shall refer to as the state of reference returns a normalized superposition of the original wave-packet and its rigid translation of α = x + ip in the phase space, x and p being position and momentum expectation value changes. In particular, taking the vibrational vacuum 0 as state of reference one obtains a normalized superposition involving the ground state itself and the coherent state α : Û (λ, α) 0 =cosλ 0 + i sin λ α. (7) It is worth recalling that 0 may be thought of as a coherent state corresponding to the classical situation wherein the harmonically confined particle is at rest in the origin. Observe also the peculiarity of the state in equation (7) consisting in the fact that the normalized superposition has two weights expressible as sines and cosine of the same number, i.e. it looks like 0 and α are orthogonal. In order to obtain a linear combination of two arbitrary Glauber coherent states, it is enough the subsequent action of another displacement operator, ˆD (β): ˆD (β) Û (λ, α) 0 =cosλ β + ieii(αβ ) sin λ α + β. (8) Hence the unitary operator ˆV (α, β, λ) ˆD (α) Û (λ, β α) =cosλ ˆD (α)+ie ii(αβ ) sin λ ˆD (β) ˆΠ (9) applied on the vacuum state generates the normalized superposition ˆV (α, β, λ) 0 =cosλ α + ie ii(αβ ) sin λ β. (10) Such a result may be easily extended taking as state of reference any eigenfunction of the Parity operator. Indeed, let ψ 0 be a ˆΠ eigenstate meaning that ψ 0 (x) x ψ 0 is an even or odd function. The action of ˆV (α, β, λ) on such a state generates ˆV (λ, α, β) ψ 0 =cosλ ˆD (α) ψ 0 +( 1) σ ie ii(αβ ) sin λ ˆD (β) ψ 0, (11) σ being the parity of ψ 0 (x). Generally speaking such a circumstance is realized only in correspondence to a specific phase correlation between the two coefficients involved in the coherent superposition. To this end observe that, given the state ψ = c 1 α 1 + c e iφ α with c 1, c, φ real numbers, the modulus ψ ψ = c 1 + c + c 1c e α β R {e iφ e ii(α β) } may be expressed as ( ) c 1 + c only if φ = π I(α β)+kπ.

884 A. Messina, B. Militello and A. Napoli In the case when α and β are real and ψ 0 is a localized wave function centered in the origin, the state in equation (10) turns out to be the superposition of two localized packets centered in x = α and x = β: x ˆV (λ, α, β) ψ 0 =cosλψ 0 (x + α)+i sin λψ 0 (x + β). (1) 3 Superpositions of more than two coherent states The question of how the number of coherent states in the superposition can be increased immediately arises. To this end the subsequent action of two ˆV unitary operators is considered. The relevant transformation is given by ˆV () (λ, µ, α 1,α,α 3,α 4 ) ˆV (λ, α 1,α ) ˆV (µ, α 3,α 4 ) (13) which may be cast in the form [ ˆV () (λ, µ, α 1,α,α 3,α 4 )= cos λ ˆD (α 1 )+ie I(α 1α ) sin λ ˆD (α ) ˆΠ ] [ cos µ ˆD (α 3 )+ie I(α 3α 4) sin µ ˆD (α4 ) ˆΠ ]. (14) Taking into account properties of ˆΠ, one obtains ˆV () (λ, µ, α 1,α,α 3,α 4 )=cosλcos µe iφ 13 ˆD (α1 + α 3 )+cosλsin µe iφ 14 ˆD (α1 + α 4 ) (15) +sinλsin µe iφ 4 ˆD (α α 4 )+sinλcos µe iφ 3 ˆD (α α 3 ) ˆΠ, where φ jk are suitable quantum phases. The four coherent states obtained when ˆV () is applied upon 0 are α 1 + α 3, α 1 + α 4, α α 3, α α 4. Despite appearances, we do not have four independently parametrically changeable states. Indeed, to generate the arbitrary quadruplet c 1, c, c 3, c 4 one has to choose the α-parameters satisfying the following equation system: α 1 + α 3 = c 1, α 1 + α 4 = c, α α 3 = c 3, α α 4 = c 4 which, unfortunately, has a vanishing determinant: 1 0 1 0 det 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 =0. 0 1 0 1 Nevertheless, the usefulness of the transformation given by equation (15) remains valid, in particular considering the fact that it can be exploited to generate threefold Schrödinger Cat-like states. More in detail ( ) ˆV () (λ, µ, 0, 0, 0,α) 0 =cosµ cos λe iφ 13 +sinλe iφ 3 0 +cosλ sin µe iφ 14 α +sinλ sin µe iφ 4 α. (16)

Generation of Glauber Coherent State Superpositions 885 In this equation we have three equidistant wave packets corresponding to the same wave function centered in the three positions x = 0, ±R{α}. A rigid translation of this state is obtained considering α 1 = α 3 =0,α =α and α 4 = α: ˆV () (λ, µ, 0, α, 0,α). In fact in this case one has a linear combination of 0, α and α. The method reported here may be extended to the case of a superposition involving N coherent state just considering ˆV (N) N ˆV (λ k,α k,β k ). k=1 Of course, like in the case N =, the number of independently determinable states is smaller than N. 4 Conclusive remarks In this paper we have presented the construction of a unitary operator, ˆV which in some sense behaves like a superposition of phase space translators. Such a circumstance, joint with the well known definition of Glauber coherent states as displaced vacuum, has provided an effective and elegant expression for an arbitrary two coherent state superposition. The subsequent application of two such unitary operators produces a four coherent state superposition and so on following the law raised to the number of applications of ˆV, which is larger than the number of coherent state which may be independently parametrically changed at will. As a conclusive remark we point out that the possibility of considering a generic linear combination of Glauber states via a unitary transformation of the vibrational vacuum leads to a more elegant and effective way to deal with those variational problems having such wave functions as candidate solutions. [1] Glauber R.G., Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field, Phys. Rev., 1963, V.131, N 6, 766 788. [] Perelomov A.M., Coherent states for arbitrary Lie groups, Commun. Math. Phys., 197, V.6, 36. [3] Schrödinger E., Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik, Naturwissenschaften, 1935, V.3, 807 81, 83 88, 844 949; reprinted in English in Quantum Theory and Measurement, Editors J.A. Wheeler and W.H. Zurek, Princeton, 1983. [4] Monroe C., Meekhof D.M., King B.E. and Wineland D.J., A Schrödinger cat superposition state of an atom, Science, 1996, V.7, 1131 1136. [5] Leibfried D., Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys., 003, V.75, 81 34. [6] Messina A., Maniscalco S. and Napoli A., Interaction of bimodal fields with few-level atoms in cavities and traps, J. Mod. Opt., 003, V.50, 1 49.