arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 2 Jun 1995

Similar documents
, which yields. where z1. and z2

Therefore the atomic diameter is 5 orders of magnitude ( times) greater than the m

( ) kt. Solution. From kinetic theory (visualized in Figure 1Q9-1), 1 2 rms = 2. = 1368 m/s

CHAPTER 4 DIAGNOSTICS FOR INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

Compressibility Effects

Study Group Report: Plate-fin Heat Exchangers: AEA Technology

Bootstrap Method > # Purpose: understand how bootstrap method works > obs=c(11.96, 5.03, 67.40, 16.07, 31.50, 7.73, 11.10, 22.38) > n=length(obs) >

CS 477/677 Analysis of Algorithms Fall 2007 Dr. George Bebis Course Project Due Date: 11/29/2007

ROUNDING ERRORS IN BEAM-TRACKING CALCULATIONS

B. Definition of an exponential

LCAO APPROXIMATIONS OF ORGANIC Pi MO SYSTEMS The allyl system (cation, anion or radical).

The -quantized systematics of quark-dominated elementary particle lifetimes

How do scientists measure trees? What is DBH?

ELECTRON CYCLOTRON HEATING OF AN ANISOTROPIC PLASMA. December 4, PLP No. 322

**DO NOT ONLY RELY ON THIS STUDY GUIDE!!!**

Kinetic Model Completeness

ECE 5318/6352 Antenna Engineering. Spring 2006 Dr. Stuart Long. Chapter 6. Part 7 Schelkunoff s Polynomial

Chem 115 POGIL Worksheet - Week 8 Thermochemistry (Continued), Electromagnetic Radiation, and Line Spectra

Hubble s Law PHYS 1301

Lecture 24: Flory-Huggins Theory

ALE 21. Gibbs Free Energy. At what temperature does the spontaneity of a reaction change?

Dispersion Ref Feynman Vol-I, Ch-31

AP Statistics Notes Unit Two: The Normal Distributions

1 The limitations of Hartree Fock approximation

Pressure And Entropy Variations Across The Weak Shock Wave Due To Viscosity Effects

Interference is when two (or more) sets of waves meet and combine to produce a new pattern.

1/2 and e0 e s ' 1+ imm w 4 M s 3 πρ0 r 3 m. n 0 ktr. .Also,since n 0 ktr 1,wehave. 4 3 M sπρ 0 r 3. ktr. 3 M sπρ 0

22.54 Neutron Interactions and Applications (Spring 2004) Chapter 11 (3/11/04) Neutron Diffusion

Supporting information

Lecture 23: Lattice Models of Materials; Modeling Polymer Solutions

Application of ILIUM to the estimation of the T eff [Fe/H] pair from BP/RP

This section is primarily focused on tools to aid us in finding roots/zeros/ -intercepts of polynomials. Essentially, our focus turns to solving.

Comparing Several Means: ANOVA. Group Means and Grand Mean

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL GaGa: a simple and flexible hierarchical model for microarray data analysis

SIZE BIAS IN LINE TRANSECT SAMPLING: A FIELD TEST. Mark C. Otto Statistics Research Division, Bureau of the Census Washington, D.C , U.S.A.

6.3: Volumes by Cylindrical Shells

^YawataR&D Laboratory, Nippon Steel Corporation, Tobata, Kitakyushu, Japan

PSU GISPOPSCI June 2011 Ordinary Least Squares & Spatial Linear Regression in GeoDa

and the Doppler frequency rate f R , can be related to the coefficients of this polynomial. The relationships are:

Sections 15.1 to 15.12, 16.1 and 16.2 of the textbook (Robbins-Miller) cover the materials required for this topic.

Physics 2B Chapter 23 Notes - Faraday s Law & Inductors Spring 2018

Lecture 17: Free Energy of Multi-phase Solutions at Equilibrium

4th Indian Institute of Astrophysics - PennState Astrostatistics School July, 2013 Vainu Bappu Observatory, Kavalur. Correlation and Regression

Phys. 344 Ch 7 Lecture 8 Fri., April. 10 th,

A mathematical model for complete stress-strain curve prediction of permeable concrete

Advanced Heat and Mass Transfer by Amir Faghri, Yuwen Zhang, and John R. Howell

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.soft] 1 Sep 2017

ChE 471: LECTURE 4 Fall 2003

Biplots in Practice MICHAEL GREENACRE. Professor of Statistics at the Pompeu Fabra University. Chapter 13 Offprint

Preparation work for A2 Mathematics [2017]

Preparation work for A2 Mathematics [2018]

MATCHING TECHNIQUES. Technical Track Session VI. Emanuela Galasso. The World Bank

FIELD QUALITY IN ACCELERATOR MAGNETS

Hypothesis Tests for One Population Mean

More Tutorial at

Lyapunov Stability Stability of Equilibrium Points

Perfrmance f Sensitizing Rules n Shewhart Cntrl Charts with Autcrrelated Data Key Wrds: Autregressive, Mving Average, Runs Tests, Shewhart Cntrl Chart

THERMAL TEST LEVELS & DURATIONS

Admissibility Conditions and Asymptotic Behavior of Strongly Regular Graphs

Verification of Quality Parameters of a Solar Panel and Modification in Formulae of its Series Resistance

AP Physics Laboratory #4.1: Projectile Launcher

Physics 2010 Motion with Constant Acceleration Experiment 1

Fall 2013 Physics 172 Recitation 3 Momentum and Springs

Scattering Observables of the N Nand Y N Interactions in the SU 6 Quark Model

GENERAL FORMULAS FOR FLAT-TOPPED WAVEFORMS. J.e. Sprott. Plasma Studies. University of Wisconsin

OF SIMPLY SUPPORTED PLYWOOD PLATES UNDER COMBINED EDGEWISE BENDING AND COMPRESSION

BOUNDED UNCERTAINTY AND CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS. Christopher Costello, Andrew Solow, Michael Neubert, and Stephen Polasky

3. Mass Transfer with Chemical Reaction

Functions. EXPLORE \g the Inverse of ao Exponential Function

7.0 Heat Transfer in an External Laminar Boundary Layer

Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge Ordinary Level. Published

THE LIFE OF AN OBJECT IT SYSTEMS

Lead/Lag Compensator Frequency Domain Properties and Design Methods

STUDIECENTRUM T.N.O. VOOR SCHEEPSBOUW EN NAVIGATIE AFDELING MACHINEBOUW - DROOGBAK la - AMSTERDAM

Performance Bounds for Detect and Avoid Signal Sensing

Chapter Summary. Mathematical Induction Strong Induction Recursive Definitions Structural Induction Recursive Algorithms

Measurement of Radial Loss and Lifetime. of Microwave Plasma in the Octupo1e. J. C. Sprott PLP 165. Plasma Studies. University of Wisconsin DEC 1967

Pattern Recognition 2014 Support Vector Machines

Determining the Accuracy of Modal Parameter Estimation Methods

4F-5 : Performance of an Ideal Gas Cycle 10 pts

Examiner: Dr. Mohamed Elsharnoby Time: 180 min. Attempt all the following questions Solve the following five questions, and assume any missing data

Introduction: A Generalized approach for computing the trajectories associated with the Newtonian N Body Problem

What is Statistical Learning?

A PLETHORA OF MULTI-PULSED SOLUTIONS FOR A BOUSSINESQ SYSTEM. Department of Mathematics, Penn State University University Park, PA16802, USA.

Modeling the Nonlinear Rheological Behavior of Materials with a Hyper-Exponential Type Function

SUMMER REV: Half-Life DUE DATE: JULY 2 nd

Revision: August 19, E Main Suite D Pullman, WA (509) Voice and Fax

OTHER USES OF THE ICRH COUPL ING CO IL. November 1975

IN a recent article, Geary [1972] discussed the merit of taking first differences

A solution of certain Diophantine problems

Computational modeling techniques

A Few Basic Facts About Isothermal Mass Transfer in a Binary Mixture

Thermodynamics Partial Outline of Topics

MODULE 1. e x + c. [You can t separate a demominator, but you can divide a single denominator into each numerator term] a + b a(a + b)+1 = a + b

Surface and Contact Stress

READING STATECHART DIAGRAMS

Math Foundations 10 Work Plan

initially lcated away frm the data set never win the cmpetitin, resulting in a nnptimal nal cdebk, [2] [3] [4] and [5]. Khnen's Self Organizing Featur

(Communicated at the meeting of January )

Transcription:

WIS-95//May-PH The rati F n /F p frm the analysis f data using a new scaling variable S. A. Gurvitz arxiv:hep-ph/95063v1 Jun 1995 Department f Particle Physics, Weizmann Institute f Science, Rehvt 76100, Israel Abstract We analyze the prtn and deutern structure functins at large x using a recently intrduced scaling variable x. This variable includes pwer crrectins t x-scaling, and thus allws us t reach the Bjrken limit at mderate Q. Using available data we extract the rati F n(x)/f p (x) fr x 0.85. Cntrary t earlier expectatins this rati tends t the value /3 fr x 1, which crrespnds t the quark mdel predictin fr equal distributins f valence quarks. Accrding t the quark-partn mdel, the structure functins f hadrns in the Bjrken limit (Q = q ν and x = Q /Mν=cnst) are directly related t the partn distributins q i (x). Fr instance F (x, Q ) F (x) = i e ixq i (x), (1) where the sum is ver the partns, whse charges are e i. In the regin x 1, the cntributin f sea quarks can be neglected. Then assuming the same distributin f the valence quarks, ne easily finds frm Eq. (1) that the neutrn-t-prtn rati F n(x)/f p (x) appraches /3 fr x 1. If, hwever, the quark distributins are different, ne can establish nly upper and lwer limits fr this rati, 1/4 < F n/f p < 4, which fllw frm isspin invariance 1

[1]. The existing data shw cnsiderable Q -dependence f the structure functins which is attributed mainly t the QCD lgarithmic crrectins t Bjrken scaling. Hwever, at highx the scaling vilatins are dminated by pwer crrectins 1/Q (higher twist and target mass effects), which are difficult t evaluate. Therefre, in rder t check the partn mdel predictins, ne needs t btain the structure functins at high Q, where these crrectins are small. At present, high Q structure functins (Q 50 (GeV/c) ) extracted frm BCDMS [] and NMC [3] data are available nly fr x < 0.7. The rati F n(x)/f p (x) btained frm an analysis f these data [4,5] shws steady decrease with x. Thus, it is usually assumed that this rati wuld reach its lwer bund, F n/f p 1/4, fr x 1. This crrespnds t d(x)/u(x) 0 fr x 1, where d(x) and u(x) are the distributin functins fr up and dwn quarks in the prtn. T check this assumptin ne needs data fr the structure functins at x > 0.7. The latter are nw available nly at mderate values f mmentum transfer, Q < 30 (GeV/c) [6 9], and exhibit very strng Q -dependence. A part f the Q -dependence f the structure functins, generated by the target mass crrectins, is usually accunted fr by using the Nachtmann scaling variable [10,11] ξ = x () 1 + 1 + 4M x /Q, instead f the Bjrken variable x. The questin is whether the target mass effect is respnsible fr a majr part f the scaling vilatin at high x. If s, the replacement f x by ξ in structure functins wuld allw us t reach the scaling limit already at mderate Q. Hwever, the analysis f recent high x SLAC data [9] in terms f the Nachtmann variable still reveals strng Q -dependence f the structure functins. Besides the target mass effects, ne can expect imprtant nnperturbative effects frm the cnfining interactin f the partns in the final state. Indeed, the partns are never free, s that the system pssesses a discrete spectrum in the final state. Althugh in the Bjrken limit the struck quark can be cnsidered a free particle, the discreteness f the spectrum manifests itself in 1/Q crrectins t asympttic structure functins [1,13]. One can expect that these crrectins are significant in particular at high x, where lwer-lying

excitatins shuld play an imprtant rle. We have fund [14] that the target mass and cnfining interactin effects in the final state can be effectively accunted fr by taken the struck quark t be ff-shell, with the same virtual mass befre and after the virtual phtn absrptin. As a result, the Bjrken scaling variable x is replaced by a new scaling variable x x(x, Q ), which is the light-cne fractin f the ff-shell struck quark. Explicitly, x = x + 1 + 4M x /Q (1 x) + 4m s x /Q, (3) 1 + 1 + 4M x /Q where M is the target mass and m s is the invariant mass f spectatr partns (quarks and gluns). Fr Q r fr x 0 the variable x cincides with the Nachtmann variable ξ, Eq. (). Hwever, at finite Q these variables are quite different. It fllws frm Eq. (3) that x depends n the invariant spectatr mass, m s. The latter can be cnsidered a functin f the external parameters nly [14]. In the limit x 1 (elastic scattering) n gluns are emitted, and thus m s m 0, the mass f a tw-quark system (diquark). When x < 1, the spectatr mass m s increases due t glun emissin. Fr x clse t 1, m s can be apprximated as m s m 0 + C(1 x), (4) where the cefficient C (GeV). In the fllwing we regard it as a phenmenlgical parameter, determined frm the data. Cnsider the prtn and deutern structure functins (per nuclen) F p,d (x, Q ) at large x. These are shwn in Fig. 1a,b as functins f x fr Q =30 (GeV/c), which is the maximal value f Q in the BCDMS measurements []. (Ntice that fr such high values f Q the variable x is clse t x, Eq. (3)). The data are taken frm [], where the slid lines crrespnd t a 15 parameter fit t BCDMS and NMC data [3]. Fr smaller values f Q, the vilatins f Bjrken scaling are very significant, Fig. 1c,d. By assuming that the majr part f x-scaling vilatins at high x are crrectly accunted fr by the variable x, the Q -dependence f the structure functins in this regin is given by 3

F p,d (x, Q ) = F p,d ( x(x, Q )). (5) Let us cmpare this result with tw BCDMS and SLAC data bins fr x=0.65, 0.75 [,6], Fig. 1c,d, which are the largest values f x available in the BCDMS experiment. We find that these data are perfectly reprduced (the dashed lines in Fig. 1c,d), by taking the spectatr mass m s =0.75 (GeV) fr x=0.75 and m s =1.05 (GeV) fr x=0.65. It is quite remarkable that the same values f m s are btained fr prtn and deutern targets, althugh the crrespnding structure functins are rather different. Using Eq. (4) ne finds that these values f m s determine the parameters m 0 and C, namely C = 3 (GeV) and m 0 = 0. The latter implies that the spectatr quarks are massless and cllinear. Using these values f m 0 and C fr definitin f m s in Eq. (3) we can study the structure functins fr x > 0.75. Cnsider first the data fr the prtn structure functin frm the SLAC experiments [6 9] in the regin x > 0.6 fr 5 < Q < 30 (GeV/c), pltted as a functin f ξ and x respectively, Fig. a,b. The data pints clse t the regin f resnances were excluded by a requirement n the invariant mass f the final state, namely (M +ν) q > (M + ), where =300 MeV. The slid line and the three data pints in Fig. a,b crrespnd t the asympttic structure functin at Q = 30 (GeV/c), the same as in Fig. 1a. The analysis in terms f the Nachtmann scaling variable ξ, Fig. a, shws pr scaling. Mrever, the data pints are far ff the asympttic structure functin (the slid line). In cntrast, the same data pltted as a functin f x, Fig. b, shw excellent scaling. Als the data pints cmpletely cincide with the structure functin at Q = 30 (GeV/c), available fr x < 0.75. This agreement prvides strng evidence that the x-scaling is nt accidental. We therefre prpse that the data pints in Fig. b represent a measurement f the asympttic structure functin fr x > 0.75 as well. Next, cnsider the deutern structure functin frm the SLAC data [6 8], Fig. 3a,b. As in the previus case, we exclude the regin f resnances by taking the invariant mass in the final state greater then M +, where =300 MeV. In additin, in rder t avid cmplicatins frm binding and Fermi mtin effects, we exclude frm ur analysis the data 4

pints with x > 0.9. (This restrictin is relevant nly fr the data [8]). Indeed, recent calculatins f Melnitchuk et al. [15] shw that the rati F d/(f p + F n ) is abut 1.13 fr x = 0.9 and Q =5 (GeV/c), and it rapidly increases fr x > 0.9. Hwever, fr x < 0.85, this rati is within 5% f unity [16]. Fig. 3a shws the deutern data pltted as a functin f the Nachtmann variable ξ. The slid line and three data pints shw the structure functin at Q = 30 (GeV/c), the same as in Fig. 1b. One finds that the data display n scaling and they are far frm the slid line. The same data as a functin f x are shwn in Fig. 3b. As in the prtn case the data shw very gd scaling and d cincide with the structure functin at Q = 30 (GeV/c). Unfrtunately, there are n deutern data in the high-x regin fr large Q, as fr instance the prtn data [9]. As a result, the available deutern data allw us t determine the asympttic structure functin nly up t x = 0.85. Nw with the asympttic structure functins F ( x) = F (x) F (x, Q ) fund abve, we can btain the rati F n (x)/f p (x). Fr this purpse we parametrize the asympttic structure functins as F p,d (x) = exp( 4 i=0 a i x i ) and determine the parameters a i frm the best fit t the data in Figs. b, 3b. The resulting F n /F p rati is shwn in Fig. 4 by the slid line. The dtted lines are the errr bars n the fit, which cmbine statistical and systematic uncertainties. The dashed line crrespnds t F n /F p = /3. Fr a cmparisn, we shw by the dt-dashed line a plynmial extraplatin f this rati t large x, btained frm BCDMS and NMC data by assuming that F n /F p 1/4 fr x 1 [4]. Our results shwn in Fig. 4 demnstrate that cntrary t earlier expectatins, the rati F n /F p des nt apprach its lwer bund, but increases up t apprximately /3. The latter is the quark mdel predictin, assuming identical distributins fr each f the valence quarks. The accuracy f ur results will be checked in future experiments, which will prvide high Q data fr the structure functins at large x. 5

I. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful t A. Bdek and S. Rck fr prviding me with data files fr prtn and deutern structure functins. Special thanks t B. Svetitsky fr reading the manuscript and making valuable cmments n it. 6

REFERENCES [1] O. Nachtmann, Nucl. Phys. B38, 397 (197). [] BCDMS Cllab., A.C. Benvenuti et al., Phys. Lett. B3, 485 (1989); Phys. Lett. B37, 59 (1989). [3] NMC Cllab., P. Amaudruz et al., Phys. Lett. B95, 159 (199). [4] BCDMS Cllab., A.C. Benvenuti et al., Phys. Lett. B37, 599 (1989). [5] NMC Cllab., P. Amaudruz et al., Phys. Lett. B371, 3 (199). [6] L.W. Whitlw, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanfrd University, 1990, SLAC-REPORT-357 (1990). [7] L.W. Whitlw et al., Phys. Lett. B8, 475 (199). [8] S.E. Rck et al., Phys. Rev. D46, 4 (199). [9] P.E. Bsted et al., Phys. Rev. D49, 3091 (1994). [10] O. Nachtmann, Nucl. Phys. B63, 37 (1973); B78, 455 (1974). [11] A. De Rujula, H. Gergi, and H.D. Plitzer, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 109, 315 (1977). [1] O.W. Greenberg, Phys. Rev. D47, 331 (1993). [13] S.A. Gurvitz and A.S. Rinat, Phys. Rev. C47, 901 (1993). [14] S.A. Gurvitz, Phys. Rev. D, in press. [15] W. Melnitchuk, A.W. Schreiber and A.W. Thmas, Phys. Lett. B335, 11 (1994). [16] Similar small binding and Fermi mtin effects in the deutern structure functin were als fund in a recent phenmenlgical analysis f J. Gmez et al., Phys. Rev. D49, 4348 (1994). 7

FIGURES FIG. 1. (a,b) F p,d ( x) = F p,d ( x,q ) at Q =30 (GeV/c). The data are frm BCDMS measurements []. The slid line is the 15 parameter fit [3] t BCDMS, NMC and SLAC data. (c,d) Prtn and deutern structure functins at cnstant x. The dashed lines shw Q -dependence f the structure functins given by Eq. (5). The data are frm BCDMS [] and SLAC [6,7] experiments. The errr bars shw cmbined statistical and systematic errrs. FIG.. (a) SLAC data fr the prtn structure functin fr 5 < Q < 30 (GeV/c), pltted as a functin f the Nachtmann variable ξ, Eq. (). The data with largest value f ξ are taken frm recent measurements [9]. Three high-statistics data sets fr Q =5.9, 7.9, and 9.8 (GeV/c), taken frm [8,9], are marked by +, x, and # respectively. The ther data pints are frm [6,7]. The errr bars shw cmbined statistical and systematic uncertainties. Three data pints marked by and the slid curve are the same as in Fig. 1a, and shw the structure functin at Q =30 (GeV/c). (b). The same data pltted as a functin f the scaling variable x. The data pints fr 5 < Q < 30 (GeV/c) cincide well with the structure functin at Q =30 (GeV/c). FIG. 3. (a) SLAC data fr deutern structure functin fr 5 < Q < 30 (GeV/c) pltted as a functin f the Nachtmann variable ξ, Eq. (). Fur high-statistics data sets fr Q =3.9, 5.9, 7.9, and 9.8 (GeV/c), taken frm [8], are marked by *, +, x and # respectively. The ther data pints are frm [6,7]. The errr bars shw cmbined statistical and systematic uncertainties. Three data pints marked by and the slid curve are the same as in Fig. 1a, and shw the structure functin at Q =30 (GeV/c). (b). The same data pltted as a functin f the scaling variable x. FIG. 4. Neutrn-t-prtn structure functin rati at large x. The slid line is the result f ur analysis. The dtted lines shw cmbined statistical and systematic errrs. The dashed line is the quark mdel predictin fr x 1 fr equal distributins f valence quarks. The dt-dashed line shws the expected behavir f this rati frm plynmial extraplatin f BCDMS and NMC data [4]. 8

_ p 0. 0.05 F ( x ) (a) d _ F (x) Q =30 (GeV / c) Q =30 (GeV / c) 0. 0.05 (b) 0.0 0.0 0.005 0.00 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 _ x 0.005 0.00 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 _ x p F (x, Q ) (c) (x, Q ) d F (d) 0.07 0.05 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.0 5 10. 15.0. 30. 50. 70. 100. 150.00. x = 0.65 x = 0.75 0.03 0.0 5 x = 0.65 x = 0.75 (GeV / c) Q 10. 15.0. 30. 50. 70. 100. 150.00. Q (GeV / c) Fig. 1

F p ( ξ, Q ) (a) +++++++ x x # + xxxxx ## ## # xx ##### 0.001 Q =30 (GeV/c) 0.0001 0.00001 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 ξ p - F (x, Q ) (b) ++++++++ x# xx xx xxxxx ## + ## # ##### xx 0.001 0.0001 0.00001 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 - x Fig.

**** ** ** **** **** ### d F ( ξ, Q ) 0.05 (a) 0.0 0.005 Q =30 (GeV/c) *** ** ++++ * +++ +++ ++ ++ ++ xx + xx # xx x ## # ## 0.00 0.001 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 ξ d - F (x,q ) 0.05 0.0 0.005 * ********* ***** ++++ +++ + ++ + ++ + xx + xxx # x ## (b) 0.00 0.001 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 Fig. 3 - x

n F (x)/f (x) 1 p 0.8 0.6 0.4 0. 0 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 x Fig.4