Bloch Theory for 1D-FLC Aperiodic Media

Similar documents
Periodic Approximant. Aperiodic Hamiltonians

to 1D Periodic Approximants Aperiodic Hamiltonians Sponsoring Jean BELLISSARD CRC 701, Bielefeld, Germany

Periodic Approximants. Aperiodic Hamiltonians

Periodic Approximants. Aperiodic Hamiltonians

Periodic Approximations for Energy Spectra in Aperiodic Media

WANNIER TRANSFORM APERIODIC SOLIDS. for. Jean BELLISSARD. Collaboration:

Aperiodic Hamiltonians

THE TOPOLOGY of TILING SPACES

COHOMOLOGY. Sponsoring. Jean BELLISSARD

The Topology of Tiling Spaces

Theory of Aperiodic Solids:

VARIOUS MATHEMATICAL ASPECTS TILING SPACES. Jean BELLISSARD 1 2. Collaborations: Georgia Institute of Technology & Institut Universitaire de France

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.ds] 6 Jul 2018

GAP LABELING THEOREMS

Magnetic symmetries:

COMPUTATIONAL. NONCOMMUTATIVE GEOMETRY The work of E. Prodan. Sponsoring. Jean BELLISSARD

TILINGS APERIODIC MEDIA

RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY COMPACT METRIC SPACES. Jean BELLISSARD 1. Collaboration:

1D-Quantum Systems. a review ( ) Sponsoring. Jean BELLISSARD. NSF grant No

NONCOMMUTATIVE. GEOMETRY of FRACTALS

Curriculum vitae Siegfried Beckus

LAPLACIANS COMPACT METRIC SPACES. Sponsoring. Jean BELLISSARD a. Collaboration:

WORKSHOP ON DYNAMICAL METHODS IN SPECTRAL THEORY OF QUASICRYSTALS

A Proof of the Gap Labeling Conjecture

Dynamics and topology of matchbox manifolds

A PROOF OF THE GAP LABELING CONJECTURE. 1. Introduction

Proof: The coding of T (x) is the left shift of the coding of x. φ(t x) n = L if T n+1 (x) L

Tiling Groupoids And Bratteli Diagrams

SIEGFRIED BECKUS, JEAN BELLISSARD

Aperiodic Substitution Tilings

Cartan sub-c*-algebras in C*-algebras

Tame definable topological dynamics

S-adic sequences A bridge between dynamics, arithmetic, and geometry

Gabor Frames for Quasicrystals II: Gap Labeling, Morita Equivale

Jan Boronski A class of compact minimal spaces whose Cartesian squares are not minimal

Asymptotic Spectral Properties of the Schrödinger Operator with Thue-Morse Potential

A mathematical model for Mott s Variable Range Hopping

Tiling Dynamical Systems as an Introduction to Smale Spaces

ELECTRONS APERIODIC MEDIA

THE CLASSIFICATION OF TILING SPACE FLOWS

COUNTEREXAMPLES TO THE COARSE BAUM-CONNES CONJECTURE. Nigel Higson. Unpublished Note, 1999

HIGHER INVARIANTS: TOPOLOGICAL INSULATORS

Aperiodic tilings (tutorial)

C*-algebras associated with interval maps

Foliation dynamics, shape and classification

Notes on Rauzy Fractals

MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS

The Structure of C -algebras Associated with Hyperbolic Dynamical Systems

Valentin Deaconu, University of Nevada, Reno. Based on joint work with A. Kumjian and J. Quigg, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems (2011)

Transverse Laplacians for Substitution Tilings

Von Neumann algebras and ergodic theory of group actions

Lipschitz matchbox manifolds

Anne Siegel Jörg M. Thuswaldner TOPOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF RAUZY FRACTALS

Definably amenable groups in NIP

Partial semigroup actions and groupoids

Some icosahedral patterns and their isometries

Spectral decimation & its applications to spectral analysis on infinite fractal lattices

On the noncommutative geometry of tilings

ATOMIC MOTION APERIODIC SOLIDS

January 2016 Qualifying Examination

FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS. Alex Suciu. Northeastern University. Joint work with Thomas Koberda (U. Virginia) arxiv:

Meyer sets, topological eigenvalues, and cantor fiber bundles

Turbulence, representations, and trace-preserving actions

S-adic sequences A bridge between dynamics, arithmetic, and geometry

Aperiodic Order in Dynamical Systems and Operator Algebras

VC-dimension in model theory and other subjects

Shift Invariant Spaces and Shift Generated Dual Frames for Local Fields

Pisot conjecture and Tilings

On a Homoclinic Group that is not Isomorphic to the Character Group *

APERIODIC ORDER AND QUASICRYSTALS: SPECTRAL PROPERTIES

Combinatorics on Finite Words and Data Structures

Margulis Superrigidity I & II

MATH 241B FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS - NOTES SPECTRAL THEOREM

Tiling Groupoids and Bratteli Diagrams

Borel complexity and automorphisms of C*-algebras

SUBSTITUTION DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS: CHARACTERIZATION OF LINEAR REPETITIVITY AND APPLICATIONS

On the Baum-Connes conjecture for Gromov monster groups

Mobile Robotics 1. A Compact Course on Linear Algebra. Giorgio Grisetti

arxiv: v1 [math.sp] 12 Oct 2012

arxiv: v1 [math.oa] 22 Jan 2018

Approximation numbers of Sobolev embeddings - Sharp constants and tractability

The faithful subalgebra

arxiv: v3 [math.ds] 6 Jul 2018

Classification of matchbox manifolds

Perturbation Theory for Self-Adjoint Operators in Krein spaces

Geometric Aspects of Quantum Condensed Matter

Introduction to Index Theory. Elmar Schrohe Institut für Analysis

Counting Clusters on a Grid

Uniqueness theorems for combinatorial C -algebras

Model sets, Meyer sets and quasicrystals

DISSIPATIVE TRANSPORT APERIODIC SOLIDS KUBO S FORMULA. and. Jean BELLISSARD 1 2. Collaborations:

equivalence in expansive dynamics

THE AUTOMORPHISM GROUP OF A SHIFT OF LINEAR GROWTH: BEYOND TRANSITIVITY

Intertwining integrals on completely solvable Lie groups

Patterns and minimal dynamics for graph maps

Workshop on Aperiodic Order: Enumeration Problems, Dynamics, and Topology

TROPICAL BRILL-NOETHER THEORY

Noncommutative Spaces: a brief overview

ON SPECTRAL CANTOR MEASURES. 1. Introduction

NOTES ON AUTOMATA. Date: April 29,

Transcription:

Sponsoring Bloch Theory for 1D-FLC Aperiodic Media CRC 701, Bielefeld, Germany Jean BELLISSARD Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta School of Mathematics & School of Physics e-mail: jeanbel@math.gatech.edu

Contributors G. De Nittis, Department Mathematik, Friedrich-Alexander Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany S. Beckus, Mathematisches Institut, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Germany V. Milani, Dep. of Mathematics, Shahid Beheshti University Tehran, Iran

Main References J. E. Anderson, I. Putnam, Topological invariants for substitution tilings and their associated C -algebras, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 18, (1998), 509-537. F. Gähler, Talk given at Aperiodic Order, Dynamical Systems, Operator Algebra and Topology Victoria, BC, August 4-8, 2002, unpublished. J. Bellissard, R. Benedetti, J. M. Gambaudo, Spaces of Tilings, Finite Telescopic Approximations, Comm. Math. Phys., 261, (2006), 1-41. J. Bellissard, Wannier Transform for Aperiodic Solids, Talks given at EPFL, Lausanne, June 3rd, 2010 KIAS, Seoul, Korea September 27, 2010 Georgia Tech, March 16th, 2011 Cergy-Pontoise September 5-6, 2011 U.C. Irvine, May 15-19, 2013 online at http://people.math.gatech.edu/ jeanbel/talksjbe.html

Content 1. GAP-graphs 2. Examples of GAP-graphs 3. Graph Complexity 4. Global Properties 5. Bloch Theory 6. Conclusion

I - GAP-graphs J. E. Anderson, I. Putnam, Topological invariants for substitution tilings and their associated C -algebras, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 18, (1998), 509-537. F. Gähler, Talk given at Aperiodic Order, Dynamical Systems, Operator Algebra and Topology Victoria, BC, August 4-8, 2002, unpublished.

One-Dimensional FLC Atomic Sets Atoms are labelled by their species (color c k ) and by their position x k with x 0 = 0 The colored proto-tile is the pair ([0, x k+1 x k ], c k ) Finite Local Complexity: (FLC) the set A of colored proto-tiles is finite, it plays the role of an alphabet. The atomic configuration L is represented by a dotted infinite word a 3 a 2 a 1 a 0 a 1 a 2 = origin

Collared Proto-points and Proto-tiles The set of finite sub-words in the atomic configuration L is denoted by W If u W is a finite word, u denotes its length. V l,r is the set of (l, r)-collared proto-point, namely, a dotted word u v with uv W u = l v = r E l,r is the set of (l, r)-collared proto-tiles, namely, a dotted word u a v with a A uav W u = l v = r

Restriction and Boundary Maps If l l and r r then π v (l,r) (l,r ) : V l,r V l,r is the natural restriction map pruning the l l leftmost letter and the r r rightmost letters compatibility. Similarly π e (l,r) (l,r ) : E l,r E l,r, compatibility. Boundary Maps: if e = u a v E l,r then 0 e = π v (l,r) (l,r+1) (u av) 1e = π v (ua v) (l,r) (l+1,r)

GAP-graphs GAP: stands for Gähler-Anderson-Putnam GAP-graph: G l,r = (V l,r, E l,r, ) is an oriented graph. The restriction map π (l,r) (l,r ) = (πv (l,r) (l,r ), πe (l,r) (l,r ) ) is a graph map (compatible with the boundary maps) π (l,r) (l,r ) : G l,r G l,r π (l,r) (l,r ) π (l,r ) (l,r ) = π (l,r) (l,r ) (compatibility) (l, r) (l, r ) (l, r ) (with (l, r) (l r ) l l, r r )

GAP-graphs Properties Theorem If n = l + r = l + r then G l,r and G l,r are isomorphic graphs. They all might be denoted by G n Any GAP-graph is connected without dandling vertex Loops are Growing: in G n grows as n if L is aperiodic the minimum size of a loop

II - Examples of GAP-graphs

The Fibonacci Tiling Alphabet: A = {a, b} Fibonacci sequence: generated by the substitution a ab, b a starting from either a a or b a Left: G 1,1 Right: G 8,8

The Thue-Morse Tiling Alphabet: A = {a, b} Thue-Morse sequences: generated by the substitution a ab, b ba starting from either a a or b a Thue-Morse G 1,1

The Rudin-Shapiro Tiling Alphabet: A = {a, b, c, d} Rudin-Shapiro sequences: generated by the substitution a ab, b ac, c db, d dc starting from either b a, c a or b d, c d Rudin-Shapiro G 1,1

The Full Shift on Two Letters Alphabet: A = {a, b} all possible word allowed. G 1,2 G 2,2

III - Graph Complexity

Complexity Function The complexity function of L is p = (p(n)) n N where p(n) is the number of words of length n. L is Sturmian if p(n) = n + 1 L is amenable if lim n p(n + 1) p(n) = 1 The configurational entropy of a sequence is defined as h = lim sup n ln(p(n)) n Amenable sequence have zero configurational entropy

Branching Points of a GAP-graph A vertex v of G l,r is a forward branching point if there is more then one edge starting at v. It is a backward branching point if there is more then one edge ending at v. The number of forward (backward) branching points is bounded by p(n + 1) p(n) Any GAP-graph of a Sturmian sequence has at most one forward and one backward branching points. L is amenable if and only if the number of branching points in G n becomes eventually negligible as n If the configurational entropy h is positive the ratio of the number of branching points in G n to the number of vertices is bounded below by e h 1 in the limit n

IV - Global Properties

The Tiling Space The ordered set {(l, r) N 2 ; } is a net and the restriction maps are compatible. The tiling space of L is the inverse limit ( ) Ξ = lim V l,r, π v (l,r) (l,r ) The Tiling Space of L is compact and completely disconnected. If no element of Ξ is periodic then Ξ is a Cantor set. The Tiling Space of L can be identified with the subset of the orbit of L by translation, made of configurations with one atom at the origin.

The Groupoid of the Transversal Given a letter a A, let Ξ( a) (resp. Ξ(a ) be the set of points in Ξ made of sequences of the form u av (resp. ua v)) with u, v one-sided infinite words. Then there is a canonical homeomorphism s a : Ξ( a) Ξ(a ) obtained from the inverse limit of the GAP-graphs as moving the dot by one edge. The family of partial maps {s a ; a A} generates a locally compact étale groupoid Γ with unit space Ξ.

The Lagarias group The Lagarias group L is the free abelian group generated by the alphabet A. By FLC, L has finite rank. Given a GAP-graph G n, L n L is the subgroup generated by the words representing the union of edges separating two branching points. L n has finite index. The Lagarias-Brillouin (LB)-zones are the dual groups B n = Hom{L n, T} Reminder: If B A are abelian groups with dual A, B, then B is isomorphic to A /B and B is isomorphic to the dual of A/B

Address Map Since one atom is at the origin, L can be mapped into the Lagarias group: this is the address map.

V - Bloch Theory

Labeling atomic sites For ξ Ξ let L ξ denotes the atomic configuration associated with ξ, which can be seen as a doubly infinite dotted word, the dot representing the position of the origin. Letters in A are the generators of L. Through the address map, L ξ L. For a proto-point of the form v = a l a 1 a 1 a r let L ξ (v) denote the set of elements x L ξ such that x a 1 + a i L ξ x + a 1 + + a j L ξ 1 i l 1 j r Remark: v is a vertex in the GAP-graph G l,r.

Hilbert Spaces Through Fourier transform K = l 2 (L) L 2 (B). Let H ξ = l 2 (L ξ ) K with orthogonal projection Π ξ. H ξ (v) = l 2 (L ξ (v)) H ξ with projection P ξ (v). Then v w P ξ (v) P ξ (w) P ξ (v) = Π ξ v V l,r

Wannier Transform Wannier transform: if f H ξ, v V l,r, κ B (W ξ f )(v; κ) = x L ξ (v) f (x) e ıκ x Parseval Formula: v V l,r B dκ (W ξ f )(v; κ) 2 = x L ξ (v) f (x) 2 In particular W ξ f l 2 (V l,r ) Π ξ L 2 (B)

Shift Representation Given a letter a A, two vertices v, w V l,r are a-related, denoted by v a w, if there is an edge e E l,r of the form u a u with 0 e = v, 1 e = w Then W ξ P ξ (w)s ξ (a)p ξ (v)w 1 ξ = { e ıκ a if v a w 0 otherwise Hence S ξ (a) is associated with the κ-dependent matrix indexed by the vertices V l,r S v,w (a; κ) = { e ıκ a if v a w 0 otherwise

A Strategy For Spectral Theory Let H = H be a polynomial w.r.t the shift operators {S(a) ; a A} and let H ξ be its representative in H ξ : The Main Idea: How can one get its spectral properties? Replace H by the corresponding polynomial in the matrices S v,w (a; κ), Compute the spectrum (band spectrum) Let (l, r) Hopefully the spectrum of H is recovered in the limit.

The Branching Points Problem If u is a branching point a-related to both v, w, the matrix S v,w (a; κ) admits the following submatrixs T = e ıκ a u v w u v w { }} { 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 T T = 2 Hence S v,w (a; κ) cannot be a partial isometry, while S ξ (a) is.

The Branching Points Problem The following rules provides a solution: change the matrix elements corresponding to the edge e = v a w into χ e so that T = e ıκ a 0 0 0 χ uv 0 0 χ uw 0 0 T T = 1 This requires the formal elements χ e s to commute and satisfy χ 2 e = χ e = χ e χ e = 1 χ e = 1 e; 0 e=u e; 1 e=u This edge algebra is commutative and finite dimensional with spectrum given by the set of branching points B l,r.

GAP-Algebras Let then A l,s be the GAP-Algebra, namely the C -algebra generated by the matrix valued functions (κ, χ) S(a; κ, χ) defined before. Just as for the GAP-graphs A l,s A l+1,r 1 so as it will be denoted by A n if n = l + r. Expected Result: The family A n converges to a C -algebra A, in the sense of continuous field of algebras. There is an exact sequence 0 J A C (Γ) 0 where the ideal J C(X) K for some completely disconnected space X. The nature of X is entirely described by the complexity of the APgraphs. In particular, if the number of branching points is bounded X is finite.

Expected Spectral Consequences If H is a polynomial in the S(a) s, then it defines a continuous field n H n A n of selfadjoint elements. Each H n has a band spectrum with a finite number of bands. Spectral Gaps: If the expected results hold, then the spectrum of H is the limit (Hausdorff metric) of the spectra of the H n s. Branching Defect Ideal: the ideal J represents the impact of defects coming from the branching points boundary conditions. The spectrum of H contains the spectrum of H ξ, the rest being due to defects. In particular, if the number of branching points is bounded, the residual part is made of a finite number of eigenvalues of finite multiplicities in each gap.

Expected Spectral Consequences Strong Convergence: If f l 2 (L ξ ) has a finite support, then it can be seen as vector in l 2 (V n ) for n large enough. It becomes possible to express the concept of strong convergence. Then the spectral measure of H n relative to f weak -converges to the spectral measure of H. Traces: there is a natural trace T n on each A n, another T on C (Γ) and T on A. This field of traces is also continuous and T is obtained from T by projection. T vanishes on the Branching Defect Ideal J.

Expected Spectral Consequences Density of States: The DOS is the measure on the real line defined by + g(e) dn (E) = T ( g(h ) ) = n,, Hence the DOS is expected to comes from the limit if the corresponding measures on each of the A n. In particular, the DOS of H should coincide with the one of H.

Conclusion

Interpretation Noncommutative Geometry versus Combinatoric: The previous formalism puts together both the knowledge about the tiling space developed during the last fifteen years and the C - algebraic approach proposed since the early 80 s to treat the electronic properties of aperiodic solids. Finite Volume Approximation: the Anderson-Putnam complex, presented here in the version proposed by Franz Gähler, provides a way to express the finite volume approximation without creating spurious boundary states.

Defects Defects and Branching Points: The main new feature is the appearance of defects expressed combinatorially in terms of the branching points. Worms in Quasicrystals: Such defects actually exist in quasicrystals under the names of flip-flops, worms or phason modes. They responsible for the continuous background in the diffraction spectrum. Branching: Since branching comes from an ambiguity in growing clusters, it is likely that such defects be systematic in any material which can be described through an FLC tiling. Amenability: If the tiling is not amenable, the accumulation of defects makes the present approach inefficient. The use of techniques developed for disordered systems might be more appropriate.

Prospect Continuous case: This formalism can be extended to the case of the continuous Schrödinger equation with similar consequences. Higher Dimension: It also extends to higher dimensional colored tilings. However, the geometry is much more demanding. A Conjecture: The most expected result is the following conjecture in dimension d 3 in the perturbative regime, namely if the potential part is small compared to the kinetic part, the Schrödinger operator for an electron in the field of an FLC configuration of atoms should have a purely absolutely continuous simple spectrum Level Repulsion: It is expected also that this a.c. spectrum corresponds to a Wigner-Dyson statistics of level repulsion.