NAPIER WIND PROJECT NATURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY March Appendix F. Vascular Plant List

Similar documents
Appendix. Vascular Plant List

Nebraska Conservation and Environmental Review Tool (CERT): Terminology used in the Tables of the CERT Report

Site 16 Charnwood Park General Description

COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation. for. False Hop Sedge (Carex lupuliformis)

COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation. for

Module 2. Classification. The Classification of Plants. We will discuss a few ways of classifying plants: Big vs. Small. Grass vs.

Study 11.9 Invasive Plant Study

Determining the potential range of dog-strangling vine in Ontario

Riparian Plants Along the Three Rivers of Pittsburgh

Data Dictionary for Observation Data Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Do Native Plant Mixtures Reduce Invasions Along Roadsides in Wisconsin? Joslyn Mink MS Candidate University of Wisconsin-Madison

Tree morphology and identification. TreeKeepers March 18, 2017

Remote Sensing and Geospatial Application for Wetlands Mapping, Assessment, and Mitigation

Botany 401 Vascular Flora of Wisconsin

X All databased and barcoded

Shoreline Protection by Native Vegetation

Wetlands in a Watershed/Landscape Context Vegetation & Wildlife August 15, Kendra Moseley, Regional ESS, Soil Science Division

A Plant Inventory of Weeden Farm

Keanahalululu Gulch, Hawaiÿi

The PA Flora from a. Perspective Reading:

Data Dictionary for Potential Conservation Area Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Common Name: GOLDENSEAL

Puakea, Hawaiÿi. Puakea, Hawaiÿi WATERSHED FEATURES

An Introduction to Day Two. Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning Lakewood, Colorado August 15-16, 16, 2006

Striped Coralroot. Summary. Protection Endangered in New York State, not listed federally.

Karr J.R. and D.R. Dudley Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environmental Manager 5:55-68.

Roberts Wildflowers. A photographic guide to showy wildflowers of Roberts Regional Recreation Area. Sorted by Flower Color

Shadow Cliffs Wildflowers

Possum-haw. Summary. Protection Endangered in New York State, not listed federally.

Common Name: GLADE MEADOW-PARSNIP. Scientific Name: Thaspium pinnatifidum (Buckley) Gray. Other Commonly Used Names: cutleaf meadow-parsnip

Vegetation and Terrestrial Wildlife

Historical Michigan Landscapes

Common Name: FLORIDA ADDER S-MOUTH ORCHID. Scientific Name: Malaxis spicata Swartz. Other Commonly Used Names: none

a n d En g in e e r i n g La b o r a t o r y

Using Transline Herbicide to Control Invasive Plants

1. PURPOSE 2. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

Alien plant species in Eastern Wisconsin Natural Areas

Continue 59 Invasive. Yes. Place on invasive plant list, no further investigation needed. STOP. No. Continue on to question 2.

Appalachian Bristle Fern

REMOTE SENSING AND GEOSPATIAL APPLICATION FOR WETLAND MAPPING, ASSESSMENT, AND MITIGATION INTRODUCTION

B - Requires a sheltered position. Prefers a moist soil.

Main Issues Report - Background Evidence 5. Site Analysis

The brilliant wildflowers of County Durham s limestone

FOURTEEN YEARS OF SPATIAL DATA FROM PLANTS OF CONCERN: WHAT ARE WE LEARNING?

Native species (Forbes and Graminoids) Less than 5% woody plant species. Inclusions of vernal pools. High plant diversity

Data Dictionary for Element Occurrence Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Introduction to Taxonomy USU Extension Service Advanced Master Gardeners 2005

Village of Cazenovia, NY. Street Tree Inventory Report

Common Name: YELLOW LADY S-SLIPPER. Scientific Name: Cypripedium parviflorum Salisbury. Other Commonly Used Names: golden slipper

Common Name: FLORIDA LADIES-TRESSES. Scientific Name: Spiranthes floridana (Wherry) Cory. Other Commonly Used Names: none

Assessments for City of Moonee Valley's Significant Tree Study

An Introduction to NatureServe Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning Phoenix, Arizona November 8 & 9, 2006

Invasive Species in Your Backyard

New England Wild Flower Society's Flora Novae Angliae: A Manual for the Identification of Native and Naturalized Higher Vascular Plants of New England

COMMENTS ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF SENECIO VELLEIOIDES (FOREST GROUNDSEL) IN TASMANIA

Previously Used Scientific Names: Viburnum dentatum L. var. bracteatum

Previously Used Scientific Names: Schwalbea australis Pennell, Schwalbea americana L. var. australis (Pennell) Reveal & Broome

Wailupe, Oÿahu. Wailupe, Oÿahu WATERSHED FEATURES

John B. Taft Connie Carroll-Cunningham Hannah L. Grant. INHS Technical Report 2014 (13) Prepared for Illinois Tollway Authority Issue Date: 03/28/2014

The Pollinator Victory Garden the Bees. Dr. Kimberly Stoner Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station New Haven

Introduction to Botany. Lecture 11

A Planthopper in the Family Fulgoridae

Establishment of vegetation transects at the right of way of Marcy South at Greenwoods Conservancy, summer 1999

Fickeisen Plains Cactus (Pediocactus peeblesianus ssp. fickeiseniae)

Common Name: THREE BIRDS ORCHID

Southwest LRT Habitat Analysis. May 2016 Southwest LRT Project Technical Report

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Attracting Pollinators to Your Garden

Family: Parnassiaceae (grass-of-parnassus) or Saxifragaceae (rockbreaker)

Common Name: GLADE WINDFLOWER. Scientific Name: Anemone berlandieri Pritzel. Other Commonly Used Names: southern thimble-weed

Appendix J Vegetation Change Analysis Methodology

Savannah District s Revised SOP: Moving Towards A Functional Approach. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Biodiversity indicators for UK habitats: a process for determining species-weightings. Ed Rowe

Will County Ecological Database Manual

Other Commonly Used Names: Simpson s zephyr-lily, Florida atamasco-lily, rain zephyr-lily, rain lily

Wailua, Maui WATERSHED FEATURES

Table 2-1. Quick reference guide to tree and shrub characteristics

Native Species? In US prior to European settlement

HABITAT EFFECTIVENESS AND SECURITY AREA ANALYSES

FARWAY CASTLE, EAST DEVON: POLLEN ASSESSMENT REPORT

BEC Correlation Old field guide IDFdk1a 91,92 & 93 BGxh2 06 BGxw 06. Site Characteristics. Soils Black chernozems on morainal blanket.

Hydrologic Forecast Centre Manitoba Infrastructure, Winnipeg, Manitoba. FEBRUARY OUTLOOK REPORT FOR MANITOBA February 23, 2018

Table 1: 2012 Aquatic Plant Community Statistics, Fish Lake, Dane County, WI Aquatic Plant Community Statistics 2012

The Minnesota Noxious Weed Lists By Category. Holly Nelson Isanti County Noxious and Invasive Weed Unit

Defining the Limit of Regulated Areas. C.1 Defining the River or Stream Flood Hazard 138. C.2 Defining the River or Stream Erosion Hazard 139

THE NATURESERVE NETWORK

One of the many strengths of a GIS is that you can stack several data layers on top of each other for visualization or analysis. For example, if you

(Dis)Assembly of the Great Lakes Forests

TAXONOMY. GENERAL INFORMATION Alaska, Canada, Northeast United States, Greenland

Common Name: SHOALS SPIDER-LILY. Scientific Name: Hymenocallis coronaria (J. LeConte) Kunth. Other Commonly Used Names: Cahaba lily, Catawba lily

Plethodontid Monitoring Protocol

Bryan F.J. Manly and Andrew Merrill Western EcoSystems Technology Inc. Laramie and Cheyenne, Wyoming. Contents. 1. Introduction...

2007 Area Source Emissions Inventory Methodology 670 RANGE IMPROVEMENT

Speedvale Bridge Trails Linkage Project Scoped Environmental Impact Study APPENDIX 4 ECOLOGICAL LAND CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET ABOUD & ASSOCIATES INC.

Sanjeev Kumar Jha Assistant Professor Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Bhopal

Draft Biodiversity, Fire, and Fuels Integrated Plan

Owens Valley Checkerbloom Sidalcea covillei

THE RED BOOK OF PLANTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA

Greater Toronto Area Cordon Count Summary Analysis of Traffic Trends 1985 to 2011

ARBORICULTURE JOURNAL OF WATER TRANSPORT AT STEM-BRANCH JUNCTURES IN WOODY ANGIOSPERMS. November 1991 Vol. 17, No. 11.

Illinois Prairie Characteristics Flower Parts & Species

Transcription:

NATURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY March 2012 Appendix F Vascular Plant List

Plant List Project: 160960697 LATIN NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD LOCAL STATUS SOURCE OLDHAM 1993 LAST UPDATE/ INITIALS PTERIDOPHYTES FERNS & ALLIES GYMNOSPERMS CONIFERS Cupressaceae Cedar Family Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 4-3 S5 G5 X Pinaceae Pine Family Picea abies Norway Spruce 5-1 SE3 G? I DICOTYLEDONS DICOTS Aceraceae Maple Family Acer saccharum ssp. saccharum Sugar Maple 4 3 S5 G5T? C Acer X freemanii Freeman's Maple Apiaceae Carrot or Parsley Family Daucus carota Wild Carrot 5-2 SE5 G? IC Apocynaceae Dogbane Family Apocynum androsaemifolium ssp. androsaemifolium Spreading Dogbane 3 5 S5 G5T? C Asclepiadaceae Milkweed Family Asclepias syriaca Common Milkweed 0 5 S5 G5 C Asteraceae Composite or Aster Family Achillea millefolium ssp. millefolium Common Yarrow 3-1 SE? G5T? Arctium minus Common Burdock 5-2 SE5 G?T? IC Centaurea biebersteinii Spotted Knapweed 5-3 SE5 G? I Cichorium intybus Chicory 5-1 SE5 G? IC Cirsium vulgare Bull Thistle 4-1 SE5 G5 I Hieracium aurantiacum Devil's Paintbrush 5-2 SE5 G? I Solidago altissima var. altissima Tall Goldenrod 1 3 S5 U Solidago canadensis Canada Goldenrod 1 3 S5 G5 X Symphyotrichum novae-angliae New England Aster 2-3 S5 G5 C Cornaceae Dogwood Family Cornus foemina ssp. racemosa Red Panicled Dogwood 2-2 S5 G5? X Dipsacaceae Teasel Family 1

Plant List Project: 160960697 LATIN NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS Dipsacus fullonum ssp. sylvestris Wild Teasel 5-1 SE5 G?T? IC LOCAL STATUS MIDD Fabaceae Pea Family Vicia cracca Tufted Vetch 5-1 SE5 G? I Fagaceae Beech Family Fagus grandifolia American Beech 6 3 S5 G5 C Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 5 1 S5 G5 C Guttiferae St. John's-wort Family Hypericum perforatum Common St. John's-wort 5-3 SE5 G? IC Lamiaceae Mint Family Prunella vulgaris ssp. lanceolata Heal-all 5 5 S5 G5T? C Oleaceae Olive Family Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 3-3 S5 G5 C Rhamnaceae Buckthorn Family Rhamnus cathartica Common Buckthorn 3-3 SE5 G? IC Rosaceae Rose Family Crataegus species Hawthorn species Fragaria virginiana ssp. virginiana Scarlet Strawberry 2 1 SU G5T? C Geum aleppicum Yellow Avens 2-1 S5 G5 X Malus species Apple species Potentilla recta Rough-fruited Cinquefoil 5-2 SE5 G? I Rubus idaeus ssp. idaeus Red Raspberry SE1 G5T5 Tiliaceae Linden Family Tilia americana American Basswood 4 3 S5 G5 C Ulmaceae Elm Family Ulmus americana White Elm 3-2 S5 G5? X Vitaceae Grape Family Parthenocissus inserta Inserted Virginia-creeper 3 3 S5 G5 X MONOCOTYLEDONS MONOCOTS Poaceae Grass Family Bromus inermis ssp. inermis Awnless Brome 5-3 SE5 G4G5T? IC 2

Plant List Project: 160960697 LATIN NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS Elymus repens Quack Grass 3-3 SE5 G? IC Phleum pratense Timothy 3-1 SE5 G? IC FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT LOCAL STATUS MIDD Species Diversity Total Species: 34 Native Species: 17 50% Exotic Species 17 50% Regionally Significant Species enter manually Locally Significant Species enter manually S1-S3 Species 0 0% S4 Species 0 0% S5 Species 16 100% Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floristic Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 2.9 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity 11 65% CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity 6 35% CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity 0 0% CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity 0 0% Floristic Quality Index (FQI) 12 Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness -1.9 weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness 7 44% weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness 4 25% weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness 5 31% Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value 2.8 upland 14 42% facultative upland 11 33% facultative 3 9% facultative wetland 5 15% obligate wetland 0 0% 3

Plant List EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY (See the following pages for addition detailed information on terms.) Botanical and Common Name: From Newmaster et. al, 1998. Species requiring confirmation noted (cf). Co-efficient of Conservatism: This value, ranging from 0 (low) to 10 (high), is based on a species tolerance of disturbance and fidelity to a specific habitat integrity. Wetness Index: This value, ranging from -5 (obligate wetland) to 5 (upland) provides the probability of a species occurring in wetland or upland habitats. Weediness Index: This value, ranging from -1 (low) to -3 (high) quantifies the potential invasiveness of non-native plants. In combination with the percentage of non-native plants, it can be used as an indicator of disturbance. Provincial Status: Provincial ranks are used by the NHIC to set protection priorities for rare species and natural communities. These ranks are not legal designations. S4 and S5 species are generally uncommon to common in the province. Species ranked S1-S3 are considered to be rare in Ontario. Local Status: X: native species present (collection-based) and all exotic species R: native species locally rare (number of sites): Hamilton-Wentworth (<6 sites), Durham (<10 sites), GTA (<40 sites), Site District 6E7 (<20 sites), Oak Ridges Moraine (20 or fewer sites), Halton (<5 sites); Peterborough (suspected of being rare, 5 or fewer occurrences); CVC/Peel Region (<11 sites) U: native species locally uncommon Hamilton-Wentworth (6-10 sites), Durham (11-20 sites), GTA (41-80 sites), Site District 6E7 (21-40 sites), Halton (5-15 sites). E: Presumed Extirpated?: More work required to determine status H: historic record O: only old (>20 years) records known (Peterborough) Record Type SR - sight record SRP - sight record with photograph TRCA Rankings: L5: able to withstand high levels of disturbance; generally secure throughout the jurisdiction, including the urban matrix. May be of very localized concern in highly degraded areas L4: able to withstand some disturbance; generally secure in rural matrix; of concern in urban matrix L3: able to withstand minor disturbance; generally secure in natural matrix; considered to be of regional concern. L2: unable to withstand disturbance; some criteria are very limiting factors; generally occur in high-quality natural areas, in natural matrix; probably rare in the TRCA jurisdiction; of concern regionally L1: unable to withstand disturbance; many criteria are limiting factors; generally occur in high-quality natural areas in natural matrix; almost certainly rare in the TRCA jurisdiction; of concern regionally LX: extirpated from our region with remote chance of rediscovery. Presumably highly sensitive LH: hybrid between two native species. Usually not scored unless highly stable and behaves like a species (e.g. Equisetum x nelsonii ) 1

Plant List L+: exotic. Not native to TRCA jurisdiction. Includes hybrids between a native species and an exotic L+?: origin uncertain or disputed, i.e. may or may not be native pl : found in natural cover, but only as planted, not regenerating The sensitivity of natural areas can be assessed through application of the Weediness Index. The Weediness Index quantifies the potential invasiveness of non-native plants, and, in combination with the percentage of non-native plants can be used as an indicator of disturbance. Values (ranging from 1- to -3) have been assigned to most non-native species based on the potential impact each species can have in natural areas: -1: little or no impact on natural areas (most non-native plants are in this category) -2: occasional impacts on natural areas, generally infrequent or localized -3: major potential impacts on natural areas Wetness Index All plants in southern Ontario have been assigned a wetland category, based on the designations developed for use by the United States Fish & Wildlife Service. Plants are designated into the following categories: OBL (Obligate Wetland): occurs almost always in wetlands under natural conditions (estimated >99% probability) FACW (Facultative Wetland): usually occurs in wetlands, but occasionally found in non-wetlands (estimated 67-99% probability) FAC (Facultative): equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands (estimated 34-66% probability) FACU (Facultative Upland): occasionally occurs in wetlands, but usually occurs in non-wetlands (estimated 1-33% probability) UPL (Upland): occurs almost never in wetlands under natural conditions (estimated <1% probability) Further refinement of the Facultative categories are denoted by a + or - to express exaggerated tendencies for those species. The + denotes a greater estimated probability occurring in wetlands than species in the general indicator category, but a lesser probability than species occurring in the next higher category. The "-" denotes a lesser estimated probability of occurring in wetlands than species in the general indicator category, but a greater probability than species occurring in the next lower general category. Each wetland category has been assigned a numerical value to facilitate the quantification of the wetness index. The wetland categories and their corresponding values are as follows: OBL : -5 FACW+: -4 FACW: -3 FACW-: -2 FAC+: -1 FAC: 0 FAC-: 1 FACU+: 2 FACU: 3 FACU-: 4 UPL: 5 2

Plant List Provincial Status Provincial ranks are used by the NHIC to set protection priorities for rare species and natural communities. These rankings are based on the total number of extant Ontario populations and the degree to which they are potentially or actively threatened with destruction. The ranks are: S1: Critically Imperiled - Critically imperiled in the nation or state/province because of extreme rarity (often 5 or fewer occurrences) or because of some factor(s) such as very steep declines making it especially vulnerable to extirpation from the state/province. S2: Imperiled - Imperiled in the nation or state/province because of rarity due to very restricted range, very few populations (often 20 or fewer), steep declines, or other factors making it very vulnerable to extirpation from the nation or state/province. S3: Vulnerable - Vulnerable in the nation or state/province due to a restricted range, relatively few populations (often 80 or fewer), recent and widespread declines, or other factors making it vulnerable to extirpation. S4: Apparently Secure - Uncommon but not rare; some cause for long-term concern due to declines or other factors. S5: Secure - Common, widespread, and abundant in the nation or state/province. SH: Possibly Extirpated (Historical) Species or community occurred historically in the nation or state/province, and there is some possibility that it may be rediscovered. Its presence may not have been verified in the past 20-40 years. A species or community could become NH or SH without such a 20-40 year delay if the only known occurrences in a nation or state/province were destroyed or if it had been extensively and unsuccessfully looked for. The NH or SH rank is reserved for species or communities for which some effort has been made to relocate occurrences, rather than simply using this status for all elements not known from verified extant occurrences. SR: Reported in Ontario, but without persuasive documentation. SX: Presumed Extirpated Species or community is believed to be extirpated from the nation or state/province. Not located despite intensive searches of historical sites and other appropriate habitat, and virtually no likelihood that it will be rediscovered. SE: Exotic; not believed to be a native component of Ontario's flora. Numerical rankings after SE follow designations described above for native species. SU: Unranked Nation or state/province conservation status not yet assessed. Rank ranges, e.g. S2S3, indicate that the rank is either S2 or S3, but that current information is insufficient to differentiate. "?" following a rank indicates uncertainty about the assigned rank. REFERENCES Nomenclature based on: Newmaster, S.G., A. Lehela, P.W.C Uhlig, S. McMurray and M.J. Oldham. 1998. Ontario plant list. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Forest Research Institute, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, Forest Research Information Paper No. 123. 550 pp. + appendices. Co-efficient of Conservatism, Wetness & Weediness Oldham, M.J., W.D. Bakowsky and D.A. Sutherland. 1995. Floristic quality assessment for southern Ontario. OMNR, Natural Heritage Information Centre, Peterborough. 68 pp. Provincial (Ontario) Status: Natural Heritage Information Centre (NHIC). 2000. Provincial status of plants, wildlife and vegetation communities database. http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/mnr/nhic/nhic.html. OMNR, Peterborough. Local Status: Varga, S., editor. August 2000. Distribution and status of the vascular plants of the Greater Toronto Area. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Aurora District. 103 pp. Goodban, A.G. September 1995. The vascular plant flora of the Regional Municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth, Ontario. First Edition, Hamilton Region Conservation Authority, Ancaster, Ontario. 86 pp. 3

Plant List Ministry of Natural Resources, February 2004. List of rare vascular plants on the Oak Ridges Moraine, excluding provincially and nationally rare species. Technical Paper 6, Appendix A-1. Goodban, A.G. 2003. Nature Counts Project; Hamilton Natural Areas Inventory 2003, Species Checklist. Hamilton Naturalists Club, Hamilton, Ontario. Riley, J.L., 1989. Distribution and Status of the Vascular Plants of Central Region. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Central Region, Richmond Hill, ON. 110 pp. Crins, W.J., McIlveen, W.D., Goodban, A.G., O'Hara, P.G. 2006. Halton Natural Areas Inventory 2006: Volume 2 Species Checklists (The Vascular Plants of Halton Region, Ontario: Species Checklist). TRCA, 2003. List provided by the Toronto Region Conservation, based on April 2003 rankings. (A pdf file.) Oldham, M.J. 1993. Distribution and status of the vascular plants of southwestern Ontario (Draft). Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources., Aylmer District, Aylmer, Ontario. 150 pp. Oldham, M.J. 1999. Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Peterborough County, Ontario. Credit Valley Conservation, 2002. Plants of the Credit River Watershed. Checklist on CVC website. 4