ISO Land Use 1990, 2000, 2010 Data Product Specifications. Revision: A

Similar documents
ISO Grain Elevators in Canada - Data Product Specifications. Revision: A

ISO Daily 10 km Gridded Climate Dataset for Canada ( ) Data Product Specifications. Revision: A

ISO Swift Current LiDAR Project 2009 Data Product Specifications. Revision: A

ISO Plant Hardiness Zones Data Product Specification

ISO MODIS NDVI Weekly Composites for Canada South of 60 N Data Product Specification

ISO Canadian Drought Monitor Data Product Specifications

ISO Agroclimate Data Data Product Specification. Revision: A

ISO Land Cover for Agricultural Regions of Canada, Circa 2000 Data Product Specification. Revision: A

ISO SMAPVEX16-MB MA Weather Station Dataset Data Product Specifications. Revision: A

2015 Nigerian National Settlement Dataset (including Population Estimates)

Land Accounts - The Canadian Experience

Pilot studies on the provision of harmonized land use/land cover statistics: Synergies between LUCAS and the national systems

Dynamic Land Cover Dataset Product Description

Quality and Coverage of Data Sources

File Geodatabase Feature Class

Southern African Land Cover ( )

La Salle Upstream of Elie Watershed LiDAR

Subwatersheds File Geodatabase Feature Class

Role of GIS and Remote Sensing to Environment Statistics

The Icelandic geographic Land Use database (IGLUD)

RESULTS OF DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION STANDARDS IN VIETNAM. Dr. Tran Bach Giang Vietnam

Introduction. Elevation Data Strategy. Status and Next Steps

Training on national land cover classification systems. Toward the integration of forest and other land use mapping activities.

Spanish national plan for land observation: new collaborative production system in Europe

An Internet-based Agricultural Land Use Trends Visualization System (AgLuT)

SPOT DEM Product Description

Global Land Cover Mapping

Globally Estimating the Population Characteristics of Small Geographic Areas. Tom Fitzwater

Measuring and Monitoring SDGs in Portugal: Ratio of land consumption rate to population growth rate Mountain Green Cover Index

An Internet-based Agricultural Land Use Trends Visualization System (AgLuT)

SECTION 1: Identification Information

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Geographic information Metadata Part 2: Extensions for imagery and gridded data

New York City Council Districts Water Included

MANUAL ON THE BSES: LAND USE/LAND COVER

AGOG 485/585 /APLN 533 Spring Lecture 5: MODIS land cover product (MCD12Q1). Additional sources of MODIS data

Land accounting in Québec: Pilot project for a sub-provincial area

Recent Topics regarding ISO/TC 211 in Japan

Extent. Level 1 and 2. October 2017

New York City Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMAs) for 2010 Census

Efficiencies in Data Acquisition and Transformation

Supplementary material: Methodological annex

McHenry County Property Search Sources of Information

WGIA7 9th July, Noriko KISHIMOTO

FlexiCadastre User Conference 2013 GIS Data Verification & Challenges

Landsat-based Global Urban Area Map

Geospatial Preservation: State of the Landscape. A Quick Overview. Steve Morris NCSU Libraries

Investigation of the Effect of Transportation Network on Urban Growth by Using Satellite Images and Geographic Information Systems

SECTION 1: Identification Information

CWPP_Wildland_Urban_Interface_Boundaries

Land Accounting. Sub-regional Workshop on Environment Statistics for South and South-West Asian Countries. Michael Bordt ESCAP

Cloud Analysis Image: Product Guide

New Land Cover & Land Use Data for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Southwestern Ontario Orthophotography Project (SWOOP) 2015 Digital Elevation Model

File Geodatabase Feature Class. Tags platts, price assessement, crude oil, crude, petroleum

Overview on Land Cover and Land Use Monitoring in Russia

NATIONAL VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION STANDARD, VERSION 2 WORKING DRAFT

TRCA_Jurisdiction. File Geodatabase Feature Class. Tags watersheds, boundary, trca

USING HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY

Pan-Arctic Digital Elevation Map (Pan-Arctic DEM)

Targeted LiDAR use in Support of In-Office Address Canvassing (IOAC) March 13, 2017 MAPPS, Silver Spring MD

EO Information Services. Assessing Vulnerability in the metropolitan area of Rio de Janeiro (Floods & Landslides) Project

Geospatial Data Standards Considerations for the delivery of 2D and 3D spatial data February 2019

International Journal of Intellectual Advancements and Research in Engineering Computations

Boreal Surface water inventory - metadata

KNOWLEDGE-BASED CLASSIFICATION OF LAND COVER FOR THE QUALITY ASSESSEMENT OF GIS DATABASE. Israel -

Presentation of the different land cover mapping activities in the French Guiana

Greening of Arctic: Knowledge and Uncertainties

ISO/TR TECHNICAL REPORT. Geographic information Imagery and gridded data. Information géographique Imagerie et données quadrillées

Overlay Analysis II: Using Zonal and Extract Tools to Transfer Raster Values in ArcMap

LANDSCAPE PATTERN AND PER-PIXEL CLASSIFICATION PROBABILITIES. Scott W. Mitchell,

Boreal Wetland probability - metadata

Principals and Elements of Image Interpretation

Boreal Fen probability - metadata

Huron Creek Watershed 2005 Land Use Map

Minnesota Geographic Metadata Guidelines. Metadata Entry Template. Version July 1, 1997

CoB_Bounds_Full_201802

This is trial version

Version 1.1 GIS Syllabus

USE OF RADIOMETRICS IN SOIL SURVEY

Validation and verification of land cover data Selected challenges from European and national environmental land monitoring

UK Contribution to the European CORINE Land Cover

Worldwide inventory of landscapes through segmentation of global land cover dataset

2011 Land Use/Land Cover Delineation. Meghan Jenkins, GIS Analyst, GISP Jennifer Kinzer, GIS Coordinator, GISP

SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting

Utilization and Provision of Geographical Name Information on the Basic Map of Japan*

400_scale_tiles(poly)(sp_nad83)

Part 1: Fundamentals

Fisheries and Oceans Canada Species at Risk. File Geodatabase Feature Class

Digital Elevation Models (DEM) / DTM

LIRR Routes, New York NY, January 2017

Landuse and Landcover change analysis in Selaiyur village, Tambaram taluk, Chennai

NATIONAL MAPPING EFFORTS: THE PHILIPPINES

IMPROVING REMOTE SENSING-DERIVED LAND USE/LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION WITH THE AID OF SPATIAL INFORMATION

LUCAS: current product and its evolutions

NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources

Fundamentals of Photographic Interpretation

GMES Service for Geospatial Reference Data Access (RDA) Covering Areas Outside Europe

THE OVERALL EAGLE CONCEPT

Global Geospatial Information Management Country Report Finland. Submitted by Director General Jarmo Ratia, National Land Survey

UK Academic Geospatial Metadata Application Profile (Version 1.0)

Transcription:

ISO 19131 Land Use 1990, 2000, 2010 Data Product Specifications Revision: A

Contents 1 OVERVIEW... 3 1.1 Informal description... 3 1.2 Data product specifications Metadata... 3 1.3 Terms and Definitions... 3 1.4 Abbreviations... 4 2 SPECIFICATION SCOPE... 4 3 DATA PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION... 4 3.1 Data series identification... 4 3.2 Data product specification... 5 3.2.1 Land Use 1990... 5 3.2.2 Land Use 2000... 5 3.2.3 Land Use 2010... 6 4 DATA STRUCTURE AND SCOPE... 7 4.1 Feature-based application schema... 7 4.2 Feature Catalogue... 7 4.3 Feature Attributes... 7 4.3.1 Class (Value)... 7 5 REFERENCE SYSTEMS... 7 5.1 Spatial Reference System... 7 5.1.1 UTM Datasets... 7 5.1.2 Web Mapping Application... 8 5.2 Temporal Reference System... 8 6 DATA QUALITY... 8 6.1 Completeness... 8 6.2 Logical Consistency... 8 6.3 Positional Accuracy... 8 6.4 Temporal Accuracy... 8 6.5 Lineage statement... 11 6.5.1 Land Use 1990... 11 6.5.2 Land Use 2000... 11 6.5.3 Land Use 2010... 11 Page 1 of 13

7 DATA CAPTURE... 12 8 DATA MAINTENANCE... 12 9 PORTRAYAL... 12 10 DATA PRODUCT DELIVERY... 13 11 METADATA... 13 Page 2 of 13

1 OVERVIEW 1.1 Informal description The 1990, 2000 and 2010 Land Use (LU) maps cover all areas of Canada south of 60 0 N at a spatial resolution of 30 metres. The LU classes follow the protocol of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and consist of: Forest, Water, Cropland, Grassland, Settlement and Otherland (barren land, ice, rock and unclassified). These maps were developed in response to a need for explicit, high-accuracy, high-resolution land use data to meet AAFC s commitments in international reporting, especially for the annual National Inventory Report (NIR) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Agri-Environmental program of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the FAOSTAT component of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The LU maps were prepared using existing source data, including a variety of land cover (LC) and crop maps and various topographic layers such as Buildings and Structures, Hydrography, Industrial and Commercial Areas, Transportation and Wetlands from the CanVec program of Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). All available source data was carefully co-registered and a series of rules were developed in order to generate a LU class for each year for each of 6.7 billion pixels. The rules followed the principle of preponderance of evidence and were developed using logic, class accuracies of the various products and expert knowledge. Examples of rules are: If 3 input products indicate forest and 2 indicate water, then the output is forest, or If one input with an accuracy of 85% indicates settlement and another with accuracy of 82% indicates water, then the output is settlement. The use of a variety of input products covering the time period from 1990 to 2012 also enabled the development of logical rules such as settlement does not disappear. The development of a LU map based on IPCC classes also necessitated the elimination of the input LC class shrubland as that is not considered a use. Shrubland was converted to other classes (primarily forest or grassland) on the basis of other inputs, location and proximity. A discrepancy resolution procedure based on the same and additional rules was developed and applied at each pixel to v0.9 of the 3 maps in order to resolve incidents of temporal discrepancy, such as a pixel being classified as water in 1990, forest in 2000 and water in 2010. Finally, accuracy assessment was conducted using 7138, 7219, and 4063 randomly selected points for 1990, 2000 and 2010 respectively. 1.2 Data product specifications Metadata This section provides metadata about the creation of this data product specification Dataset title: Land Use 1990, 2000 and 2010 (LU1990, LU2000, LU2010) Dataset reference date: 2015-01-01 Dataset responsible party: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Dataset language: English, French Dataset topic category: ; Land Use 1.3 Terms and Definitions Feature: map depiction of a real-world phenomenon Attribute: characteristic of a feature Page 3 of 13

Class: a set of objects that share the same attributes, operations, methods, relationships, and semantics; Object: entity with a well-defined boundary and identity that encapsulates state and behaviour (an instance of a class); 1.4 Abbreviations AAFC LU LC CanVec Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Land Use Land Cover Canada Vectors ; a digital cartographic product in vector format 2 SPECIFICATION SCOPE This data specification has only one scope, the general scope. NOTE: The term specification scope originates from the International Standard ISO19131. Specification scope does not express the purpose for the creation of a data specification or the potential use of data, but identifies partitions of the data specification where specific requirements apply. 3 DATA PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION 3.1 Data series identification Title Land Use 1990, 2000 & 2010 Alternate Title None Abstract The 1990, 2000 and 2010 Land Use (LU) maps cover all areas of Canada south of 60 0 N at a spatial resolution of 30 metres. The LU classes follow the protocol of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and consist of: Forest, Water, Cropland, Grassland, Settlement and Otherland. Purpose The 1990, 2000 and 2010 Land Use (LU) maps were developed in response to a need for explicit, high-accuracy, high-resolution land use data to meet AAFC s commitments in international reporting, especially for the annual National Inventory Report (NIR) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Agri-Environmental program of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the FAOSTAT component of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Topic Category Land Use Spatial Representation Type Grid Spatial Resolution 30 meters Geographic Description Canada UTM Zones 9-22 South of 60 Degrees North Supplemental Information None Page 4 of 13

Constraints Keywords Scope Identification Data are subject to the Government of Canada Open Data Licence Agreement available at www.data.gc.ca. Thesaurus: Government of Canada Core Subject Thesaurus (http://www.thesaurus.gc.ca/recherchesearch/thes-eng.html) Date: February 1, 2000 Keywords: Land Use, Agriculture, Environment, Forestry Series 3.2 Data product specification 3.2.1 Land Use 1990 Title Land Use 1990 Alternate Title LU1990 Abstract The 1990 Land Use (LU) map covers all areas of Canada south of 60 o N at a spatial resolution of 30 metres. The LU classes follow the protocol of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and consist of: Forest, Water, Cropland, Grassland, Settlement and Otherland. Purpose The 1990 Land Use (LU) map was developed in response to a need for explicit, high-accuracy, high-resolution land use data to meet AAFC s commitments in international reporting. Topic Category Land Use Spatial Representation Type Grid Spatial Resolution 30 meters Geographic Description Canada UTM Zones 9-22 South of 60 Degrees North Supplemental Information Accuracy assessment. See section 6.5 Constraints Data are subject to the Government of Canada Open Data Licence Agreement available at www.data.gc.ca. Keywords Thesaurus: Government of Canada Core Subject Thesaurus (http://www.thesaurus.gc.ca/recherchesearch/ thes-eng.html) Date: February 1, 2000 Keywords: Land Use, Agriculture, Environment, Forestry Scope Identification Dataset 3.2.2 Land Use 2000 Title Land Use 2000 Alternate Title LU2000 Abstract The 2000 Land Use (LU) map covers all areas of Canada south of 60 o N at a spatial resolution of 30 metres. The LU classes follow the protocol of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and consist of: Forest, Water, Cropland, Page 5 of 13

Grassland, Settlement and Otherland. Purpose The 2000 Land Use (LU) map was developed in response to a need for explicit, high-accuracy, high-resolution land use data to meet AAFC s commitments in international reporting. Topic Category Land Use Spatial Representation Type Grid Spatial Resolution 30 meters Geographic Description Canada UTM Zones 9-22 South of 60 Degrees North Supplemental Information Accuracy assessment. See section 6.5 Constraints Data are subject to the Government of Canada Open Data Licence Agreement available at www.data.gc.ca. Keywords Thesaurus: Government of Canada Core Subject Thesaurus (http://www.thesaurus.gc.ca/recherchesearch/thes-eng.html) Date: February 1, 2000 Keywords: Land Use, Agriculture, Environment, Forestry Scope Identification Dataset 3.2.3 Land Use 2010 Title Land Use 2010 Alternate Title LU2010 Abstract The 2010 Land Use (LU) map covers all areas of Canada south of 60 o N at a spatial resolution of 30 metres. The LU classes follow the protocol of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and consist of: Forest, Water, Cropland, Grassland, Settlement and Otherland. Purpose The 2010 Land Use (LU) map was developed in response to a need for explicit, high-accuracy, high-resolution land use data to meet AAFC s commitments in international reporting. Topic Category Land Use Spatial Representation Type Grid Spatial Resolution 30 meters Geographic Description Canada UTM Zones 9-22 South of 60 Degrees North Supplemental Information Accuracy assessment. See section 6.5 Constraints Data are subject to the Government of Canada Open Data Licence Agreement available at www.data.gc.ca. Keywords Thesaurus: Government of Canada Core Subject Thesaurus (http://www.thesaurus.gc.ca/recherchesearch/thes-eng.html) Date: February 1, 2000 Keywords: Land Use, Agriculture, Environment, Forestry Scope Identification Dataset Page 6 of 13

4 DATA STRUCTURE AND SCOPE 4.1 Feature-based application schema Not applicable 4.2 Feature Catalogue Title Land Use 1990, 2000 & 2010 Scope Series Version Number 1 Version Data January 1, 2015 Producer Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Note: System-generated attributes (for example, OBJECTID, Shape, Shape Length and Area) are not defined in the feature catalog. 4.3 Feature Attributes 4.3.1 Class (Value) Name Class( Value) Definition Aliases Producer AAFC Value Data Type Integer Value Domain Type 1 (enumerated) Value Domain Feature Attribute Value Label Code Definition Unclassified 11 Areas not classified due to clouds Settlement 21 Built-up and urban Roads 25 Primary, secondary and tertiary Water 31 Natural and human-made Forest 41 Treed areas >1 ha in size Forest Wetland 42 Wetland with forest cover Trees 45 Treed areas <1 ha in size Treed Wetland 46 Wetland with tree cover Cropland 51 Annual and perennial Grassland Managed Grassland Unmanaged 61 Natural grass and shrubs used for cattle grazing 62 Natural grass and shrubs with no apparent use (forest openings, alpine meadows, tundra, etc.) Wetland 71 Undifferentiated wetland Wetland Shrub 73 Wetland with shrub cover Wetland Herb 74 Wetland with grass cover Other land 91 Rock, beaches, ice, barren land 5 REFERENCE SYSTEMS 5.1 Spatial Reference System 5.1.1 UTM Datasets Horizontal coordinate reference system: WGS 84 Page 7 of 13

Map projection: UTM zone 10N; EPSG:32610, UTM zone 11N; EPSG:32611, UTM zone 12N; EPSG:32612, UTM zone 13N; EPSG:32613, UTM zone 14N; EPSG:32614, UTM zone 15N; EPSG:32615, UTM zone 16N; EPSG:32616, UTM zone 17N; EPSG:32617, UTM zone 18N; EPSG:32618, UTM zone 19N; EPSG:32619, UTM zone 20N; EPSG:32620 5.1.2 Web Mapping Application Horizontal coordinate reference system: WGS 84 Map projection: Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere; EPSG: 3857 5.2 Temporal Reference System Gregorian calendar 6 DATA QUALITY 6.1 Completeness DQ_Scope DQ_Element DQ_Subelement DQ_Measure DQ_MeasureDesc DQ_MeasureID DQ_EvalMethod DQ_EvalMethodType DQ_EvalMethodDesc DQ_Result DQ_ValueType DQ_Value DQ_ValueUnit DQ_Date DQ_ConformanceLevel Dataset Parameters Quality Result Meaning All information represents landuse in Canada, south of 60 0 N latitude. 1 - Completeness 1 - Commission Pass-Fail 2 - external All pixels fall within the borders of Canada, south of 60 0 N latitude. 1 - Boolean TRUE NA 31-Jan-15 Zero commissions in dataset X records in dataset. Dataset passes. 6.2 Logical Consistency Measure not defined at this time 6.3 Positional Accuracy Measure not defined at this time Not tested 6.4 Temporal Accuracy Page 8 of 13

DQ_Scope 1990 Geocover Product. 2000 Geocover Product. 2010 Geocover Product. DQ_Element 4 Temporal accuracy 4 Temporal accuracy 4 Temporal accuracy 2 Temporal 2 Temporal DQ_Subelement 2 Temporal consistency consistency consistency DQ_Measure DQ_MeasureDesc Pass-Fail Pass-Fail Pass-Fail DQ_MeasureID DQ_EvalMethod DQ_EvalMethodType 1 - external 1 - external 1 - external DQ_EvalMethodDesc Imagery utilized covers years 1988 through 1994 Imagery utilized covers years 1998 through 2002 Imagery utilized covers years 2009 through 2012 DQ_Result DQ_ValueType 1 - Boolean 1 - Boolean 1 - Boolean DQ_Value TRUE TRUE TRUE DQ_ValueUnit NA NA NA DQ_Date 31-Jan-15 31-Jan-15 31-Jan-15 Dataset conforms to Dataset conforms to Dataset conforms to DQ_ConformanceLevel expectations. expectations. expectations. Dataset Parameters X records in dataset. X records in dataset. X records in dataset. Quality Result Meaning Dataset passes. Dataset passes. Dataset passes. 6.5 Classification Accuracy The following confusion matrices were compiled through comparison of each map with randomly generated points at which ground-truth information for the appropriate year was collected through field survey or visual aerial photo or high-resolution satellite image interpretation. The overall accuracy was estimated at 84.0%, 87.1% and 92.7% for 1990, 2000 and 2010 respectively. Since some locations can legitimately be both Wetland and Forest and others can be both Water and Wetland, overall accuracies improve to 89.1%, 90.6% and 94.7% for 1990, 2000 and 2010 respectively if misclassifications between those classes are not considered errors. The greatest amount of misclassification occurs between Otherland and Forest, Grassland and Forest, Cropland and Forest and Wetland and Forest. The majority of error occurs with boundary pixels. LU1990 Ground-Truth Map Forest Water Cropland Settlement Wetland Otherland Grassland Total Users accuracy Forest 2781 32 56 23 113 11 12 3028 91.8% Water 25 1372 6 2 9 1 3 1418 96.8% Cropland 103 3 524 37 26 5 35 733 71.5% Settlement 4 0 18 190 5 0 0 217 87.6% Wetland 172 74 40 9 859 17 9 1180 72.8% Otherland 87 8 5 8 30 91 13 242 37.6% Grassland 78 7 26 1 29 2 177 320 55.3% Total 3250 1496 675 270 1071 127 249 7138 Page 9 of 13

Producers accuracy 85.6% 91.7% 77.6% 70.4% 80.2% 71.7% 71.1% Overall accuracy = 84.0% K hat (Kappa) = 78.0% LU2000 Ground-Truth Map Forest Water Cropland Settlement Wetland Otherland Grassland Total Users accuracy Forest 2870 28 48 19 85 8 13 3071 93.5% Water 18 1181 6 3 8 1 2 1219 96.9% Cropland 84 27 1004 25 36 0 45 1221 82.2% Settlement 3 0 15 217 5 0 0 240 90.4% Wetland 109 55 35 1 776 17 7 1000 77.6% Otherland 60 6 3 4 27 75 11 186 40.3% Grassland 61 5 27 0 23 2 164 282 58.2% Total 3205 1302 1138 269 960 103 242 7219 Producers accuracy 89.5% 90.7% 88.2% 80.7% 80.8% 72.8% 67.8% Overall accuracy = 87.1% K hat (Kappa) = 82.4% LU2010 Ground-Truth Map Forest Water Cropland Settlement Wetland Otherland Grassland Total Users accuracy Forest 1719 12 20 5 24 7 8 1795 95.8% Water 8 839 1 0 3 1 0 852 98.5% Cropland 12 3 429 5 3 1 7 460 93.3% Settlement 3 0 0 50 2 2 0 57 87.7% Wetland 43 14 2 0 464 19 5 547 84.8% Otherland 41 3 0 0 3 182 4 233 78.1% Grassland 16 0 18 0 1 2 82 119 68.9% Total 1842 871 470 60 500 214 106 4063 Producers accuracy 93.3% 96.3% 91.3% 83.3% 92.8% 85.0% 77.4% Overall accuracy = 92.7% K hat (Kappa) = 89.8% Page 10 of 13

6.6 Lineage statement 6.6.1 Land Use 1990 Lineage Statement Derived from: - Land Cover for Agricultural regions of Canada, c.2000 - Circa1990 Geocover - Canadian Forest Service (CFS): Earth Observation for Sustainable Development of Forests Land Cover, c.2000 - Rasterized CanVec base features - Southern Ontario Land Resource Information System (2000-2002), v 1.2 - AAFC (AESB/EOS) Prairie Grassland Extents, c.2010 - National Road Network (NRN) Roads Scope Dataset (Land Use 1990) 6.6.2 Land Use 2000 Lineage Statement Derived from: - Land Cover for Agricultural regions of Canada, c.2000 - Circa1990 Geocover - Canadian Forest Service (CFS): Earth Observation for Sustainable Development of Forests Land Cover, c.2000 - Rasterized CanVec base features - Southern Ontario Land Resource Information System (2000-2002), v 1.2 - AAFC (AESB/EOS) Prairie Grassland Extents, c.2010 - National Road Network (NRN) Roads Scope Dataset (Land Use 2000) 6.6.3 Land Use 2010 Lineage Statement Derived from: - AAFC Crop Inventory 2011, 2012, 2013 - Land Cover for Agricultural regions of Canada, c.2000 - Canadian Forest Service (CFS): Earth Observation for Sustainable Development of Forests Land Cover, c.2000 - Rasterized CanVec base features - National Road Network (NRN) Roads Scope Dataset (Land Use 2010) Page 11 of 13

7 DATA CAPTURE All available source data except 1990 Geocover is publicly available from various websites. Geocover was accessed under a sole-use agreement with Environment Canada. 8 DATA MAINTENANCE Frequency: Irregular 9 PORTRAYAL Page 12 of 13

10 DATA PRODUCT DELIVERY TIF format name: Tag Interleaved File: version: 6.0 specification: GeoTIFF is format extension for storing georeference and geocoding information in a TIFF 6.0 compliant raster file by tying a raster image to a known model space or map projection. languages: eng character set: utf8 11 METADATA The metadata requirements follow the Government of Canada s Treasury Board Standard on Geospatial Data (ISO19115) Page 13 of 13