Detecting genuine multipartite entanglement in higher dimensional systems

Similar documents
Quantum entanglement and its detection with few measurements

Introduction to entanglement theory & Detection of multipartite entanglement close to symmetric Dicke states

Distinguishing different classes of entanglement for three qubit pure states

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 27 Oct 2014

Single-Particle Interference Can Witness Bipartite Entanglement

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 21 Oct 2013

Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig

Entanglement: concept, measures and open problems

Gisin s theorem for three qubits Author(s) Jing-Ling Chen, Chunfeng Wu, L. C. Kwek and C. H. Oh Source Physical Review Letters, 93,

Instantaneous Nonlocal Measurements

Experimental state and process reconstruction. Philipp Schindler + Thomas Monz Institute of Experimental Physics University of Innsbruck, Austria

Entanglement witnesses

Quantum Entanglement- Fundamental Aspects

Permutations and quantum entanglement

Entanglement Measures and Monotones

Borromean Entanglement Revisited

Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective

Entanglement detection close to multi-qubit Dicke states in photonic experiments (review)

Exploring finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces by Quantum Optics. PhD Candidate: Andrea Chiuri PhD Supervisor: Prof. Paolo Mataloni

Quantum Marginal Problems

PHY305: Notes on Entanglement and the Density Matrix

Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 28 Jun 2006

Generation and classification of robust remote symmetric Dicke states

MP 472 Quantum Information and Computation

Entanglement Polytopes

Shared Purity of Multipartite Quantum States

arxiv: v4 [quant-ph] 28 Feb 2018

Asymptotic Pure State Transformations

Application of Structural Physical Approximation to Partial Transpose in Teleportation. Satyabrata Adhikari Delhi Technological University (DTU)

Entanglement, mixedness, and spin-flip symmetry in multiple-qubit systems

Bell inequality, Bell states and maximally entangled states for n qubits

Estimation of Optimal Singlet Fraction (OSF) and Entanglement Negativity (EN)

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 16 Nov 2018

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 7 Apr 2014

Detecting pure entanglement is easy, so detecting mixed entanglement is hard

Quantum Entanglement: Detection, Classification, and Quantification

Quantum Fisher information and entanglement

Logical error rate in the Pauli twirling approximation

Robust Quantum Error-Correction. via Convex Optimization

arxiv: v4 [quant-ph] 21 Oct 2014

Gerardo Adesso. Davide Girolami. Alessio Serafini. University of Nottingham. University of Nottingham. University College London

Quantum Information Types

Characterization of Multipartite Entanglement

CS/Ph120 Homework 4 Solutions

Overlapping qubits. Parallel self-testing of (tilted) EPR pairs via copies of (tilted) CHSH. The parallel-repeated magic square game is rigid

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 8 Jul 2014

Estimating entanglement in a class of N-qudit states

Multipartite Monogamy of the Entanglement of Formation. Abstract

Measuring entanglement in synthetic quantum systems

Two-mode excited entangled coherent states and their entanglement properties

The Fermionic Quantum Theory

Permutationally invariant quantum tomography

Schur-Weyl duality, quantum data compression, tomography

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 24 Dec 2003

Strong converse theorems using Rényi entropies

arxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 10 Aug 2018

Multi-partite entanglement

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 16 Oct 2006

arxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 9 Jul 2018

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 5 Dec 2013

INSTITUT FOURIER. Quantum correlations and Geometry. Dominique Spehner

Extremal properties of the variance and the quantum Fisher information; Phys. Rev. A 87, (2013).

Principles of Quantum Mechanics Pt. 2

Generalized Bell Inequality and Entanglement Witness

Lecture 6 Sept. 14, 2015

Quantum Entanglement and the Bell Matrix

Fourier analysis of boolean functions in quantum computation

Challenges in Quantum Information Science. Umesh V. Vazirani U. C. Berkeley

Simulation of n-qubit quantum systems. II. Separability and entanglement

Entanglement in Topological Phases

Device-Independent Quantum Information Processing (DIQIP)

Ph 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 3 November 2006

Tensor network simulations of strongly correlated quantum systems

Quantum correlations and group C -algebras

Maximally Entangled State and Bell s Inequality in Qubits

arxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 27 Feb 2009

Witnessing Genuine Many-qubit Entanglement with only Two Local Measurement Settings

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 26 Feb 2018

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 15 Jul 2014

arxiv:quant-ph/ Mar 2006

Trivariate analysis of two qubit symmetric separable state

Entanglement and Symmetry in Multiple-Qubit States: a geometrical approach

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 28 May 1998

(Quantum?) Processes and Correlations with no definite causal order

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 12 Feb 2007

Various notions of positivity for bi-linear maps and applications to tri-partite entanglement

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 7 Aug 2011

Compression and entanglement, entanglement transformations

Quantum Computing with Para-hydrogen

Driving Qubit Transitions in J-C Hamiltonian

The quantum speed limit

How to play two-players restricted quantum games with 10 cards

Minimum Uncertainty for Entangled States

Fidelity of Quantum Teleportation through Noisy Channels

Uncertainty Relations, Unbiased bases and Quantification of Quantum Entanglement

On PPT States in C K C M C N Composite Quantum Systems

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 8 Jul 2014

DECAY OF SINGLET CONVERSION PROBABILITY IN ONE DIMENSIONAL QUANTUM NETWORKS

Measuring Entanglement Entropy in Synthetic Matter

Transcription:

University of Vienna March 16, 2011 (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 1 / 19

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 2 / 19

To start with some easy basics (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 3 / 19

To start with some easy basics (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 3 / 19

To start with some easy basics Just joking!! ;) (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 3 / 19

Dicke- are entangled (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 4 / 19

Dicke- are entangled First investigated with respect to light emission of a cloud of atoms (by Robert H. Dicke in 1954) (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 4 / 19

Dicke- are entangled First investigated with respect to light emission of a cloud of atoms (by Robert H. Dicke in 1954) They can easily be converted to GHZ- or W- (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 4 / 19

Dicke- are entangled First investigated with respect to light emission of a cloud of atoms (by Robert H. Dicke in 1954) They can easily be converted to GHZ- or W- Providing a rich resource for quantum information tasks (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 4 / 19

Dicke- are entangled First investigated with respect to light emission of a cloud of atoms (by Robert H. Dicke in 1954) They can easily be converted to GHZ- or W- Providing a rich resource for quantum information tasks For experimentalists: Remarkable robustness to particle loss! (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 4 / 19

We assume ψ H = C d1 C d2... C dn. If a state can be writen as ψ = φ 1 φ 2... φ k we call it k-seperable. We call a mixed state k-seperable if there exists a decomposition of the form ρ = i p i ψ i k ψi k with i p i = 1, p i > 0 (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 5 / 19

Conceptual structur of in terms of seperability (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 6 / 19

We introduce Π that stands for the global permutation operator which performs simultaneous permutations on all sub. P i = Π Ai 1 Bi permutes in the fictitious sub we labeled A i and B i (i = 1,..., 2 n 1 1), while the sum runs over all inequivalent bipartitions. (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 7 / 19

We introduce Π that stands for the global permutation operator which performs simultaneous permutations on all sub. P i = Π Ai 1 Bi permutes in the fictitious sub we labeled A i and B i (i = 1,..., 2 n 1 1), while the sum runs over all inequivalent bipartitions. Theorem φ ρ 2 Π φ i φ P i ρ 2 P i φ 0 holds biseperable ρ S 2 if φ is fully seperable. (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 7 / 19

Note that the potential to detect the character of a given entangled state will depend on a suitable choice of φ. (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 8 / 19

Note that the potential to detect the character of a given entangled state will depend on a suitable choice of φ. This however is far less difficult then for comparable problems, e.g optimization of witnesses. (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 8 / 19

Dicke To get a feeling for how Dicke look like, we have a look on the simplest case i.e. n = 4 and m = 2, D2 4 = 1 ( 1100 + 1010 + 1001 + 0110 + 0101 + 0011 ). 6 For our citeria we need a generalized definition of the Dicke. (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 9 / 19

We define the generalized Dicke as following Dm n = 1 d N {α} {α} with N = d {α} = i / {α} ( ) 1 n 2 m 0 i i {α} 1 i where i = [1, n] N {α} = m N where the sum is taken over all inequivalent permutations. (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 10 / 19

For the simplest case, i.e. n = 4 and m = 2 we get {{12}, {13}, {14}, {23}, {24}, {34}} for the inequivalent permutations of {α}. Now we have d {12} = 1100 d {13} = 1010. and as we sum them up we have D2 4. (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 11 / 19

We define Π {α} as the cyclic permutation operator acting on the twofold copy Hilbert space, e.g. Π {1} φ 1 φ 2 ψ 1 ψ 2 = ψ 1 φ 2 φ 1 ψ 2 Also {γ} = {({α}, {β}) : {α} {β} = 1} and ( ) n m 1 N D = m. m 1 (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 12 / 19

We define Π {α} as the cyclic permutation operator acting on the twofold copy Hilbert space, e.g. Π {1} φ 1 φ 2 ψ 1 ψ 2 = ψ 1 φ 2 φ 1 ψ 2 Also {γ} = {({α}, {β}) : {α} {β} = 1} and ( ) n m 1 N D = m. m 1 Main result For 1 < m n 2 I n m[ρ] 0 holds for all biseparable. (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 12 / 19

Maximal violation Note that the inequality is always maximally violated by the corresponding Dicke state D n m, with the number of excitations m equal to {α}, with a value of I n m[ D n m D n m ] = m((n m) N D ). (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 13 / 19

Noise resistance We can now mix the Dicke state with white noise to figure out the noise resistance. Evaluating our criteria for the state ρ noise = (1 p) D n m D n m + p 1 2 n 1. we can derive a general expression for the noise resistance 1 m p < 1 m 1 ( n ). 2 n m (2n 3m + 1) (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 14 / 19

Figure: The plot shows the white noise resistance parameter p in terms of n, where from left to right the resistance is plotted for m = 2 to m = 20 in ascending order. (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 15 / 19

Figure: This plot shows the detection quality for the six qubit state ρ = pρ D2 + qρ D3 + 1 p q 2 1, where ρ 6 D2 = D2 6 D6 2 and ρ D3 = D3 6 D6 3. Region I : D 2 represents the parameter region for which the state is detected to be ly entangled corresponding to D2 6 and analogously I : D 3 corresponds in the same way using D3 6. The region F : D 3 depicts the parameter region detected by the fidelity witness used in Ref. 1 which clearly demonstrates the improvement provided by inequality. (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 16 / 19

Experimental feasibility We can re-express any density matrix element in terms of local expectation values of Pauli operators. (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 17 / 19

Experimental feasibility We can re-express any density matrix element in terms of local expectation values of Pauli operators. This is a crucial issue for experimental implementation. (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 17 / 19

Experimental feasibility We can re-express any density matrix element in terms of local expectation values of Pauli operators. This is a crucial issue for experimental implementation. While a full state tomography becomes unachievable with growing system size, i.e. the number of local measurements required grows exponentially (with 2 2n for n qubits). (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 17 / 19

Experimental feasibility We can re-express any density matrix element in terms of local expectation values of Pauli operators. This is a crucial issue for experimental implementation. While a full state tomography becomes unachievable with growing system size, i.e. the number of local measurements required grows exponentially (with 2 2n for n qubits). The number of density matrix elements which need to be ascertained for our inequalities grows only polynomially with system size (e.g. for m = 2 with n 3 ). (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 17 / 19

Experimental feasibility We can re-express any density matrix element in terms of local expectation values of Pauli operators. This is a crucial issue for experimental implementation. While a full state tomography becomes unachievable with growing system size, i.e. the number of local measurements required grows exponentially (with 2 2n for n qubits). The number of density matrix elements which need to be ascertained for our inequalities grows only polynomially with system size (e.g. for m = 2 with n 3 ). E.g. for four qubits there are 39 local measurement settings required, which is a lot more feasible than the 255, required for a full sate tomography. (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 17 / 19

and Outlook New inequalities for other classes of entangled? Inequalities as lower bounds for a measure? see arxiv:1101.2001 Outlook We are expecting that we are able to improve the structure of the presented criteria and make them even stronger. (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 18 / 19

R. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954). M. Huber, F. Mintert, A. Gabriel and B.C. Hiesmayr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 210501 (2010). M. Huber, P. Erker, H. Schimpf, A. Gabriel and B.C. Hiesmayr, arxiv/quant-ph: 1011.4579. (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 19 / 19