R k. t + 1. n E t+1 = ( 1 χ E) W E t+1. c E t+1 = χ E Wt+1 E. Γ E t+1. ) R E t+1q t K t. W E t+1 = ( 1 Γ E t+1. Π t+1 = P t+1 /P t

Similar documents
Sticky Leverage. João Gomes, Urban Jermann & Lukas Schmid Wharton School and UCLA/Duke. September 28, 2013

The Implications of Limited Asset Market Participation

The Natural Rate of Interest and its Usefulness for Monetary Policy

Business Failure and Labour Market Fluctuations

A Modern Equilibrium Model. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde University of Pennsylvania

Bayesian Estimation of DSGE Models: Lessons from Second-order Approximations

Can News be a Major Source of Aggregate Fluctuations?

Simple New Keynesian Model without Capital

Optimal Inflation Stabilization in a Medium-Scale Macroeconomic Model

A Discussion of Arouba, Cuba-Borda and Schorfheide: Macroeconomic Dynamics Near the ZLB: A Tale of Two Countries"

Equilibrium Conditions and Algorithm for Numerical Solution of Kaplan, Moll and Violante (2017) HANK Model.

The New Keynesian Model: Introduction

Gold Rush Fever in Business Cycles

Monetary Policy and Unemployment: A New Keynesian Perspective

Gold Rush Fever in Business Cycles

Monetary Policy with Heterogeneous Agents: Insights from Tank Models

and in each case give the range of values of x for which the expansion is valid.


Signaling Effects of Monetary Policy

Dynamic Asset Allocation - Identifying Regime Shifts in Financial Time Series to Build Robust Portfolios

Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models. December 4, 2007

Optimal Simple And Implementable Monetary and Fiscal Rules

APPENDIX TO RESERVE REQUIREMENTS AND OPTIMAL CHINESE STABILIZATION POLICY

DSGE-Models. Calibration and Introduction to Dynare. Institute of Econometrics and Economic Statistics

Financial Factors in Economic Fluctuations. Lawrence Christiano Roberto Motto Massimo Rostagno

Adaptive Learning and Applications in Monetary Policy. Noah Williams

Monetary Policy and Unemployment: A New Keynesian Perspective

Optimal Monetary Policy with Informational Frictions

Fiscal Multipliers in a Nonlinear World

Inference. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde University of Pennsylvania

Simple New Keynesian Model without Capital

Economics 232c Spring 2003 International Macroeconomics. Problem Set 3. May 15, 2003

. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Friday April 1 ± ǁ

Tax Incidence in DSGE Model

State Space Models and Filtering. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde University of Pennsylvania


PR D NT N n TR T F R 6 pr l 8 Th Pr d nt Th h t H h n t n, D D r r. Pr d nt: n J n r f th r d t r v th tr t d rn z t n pr r f th n t d t t. n

Seoul National University Mini-Course: Monetary & Fiscal Policy Interactions II

An introduction of a simple monetary policy with savings taxation in the overlapping generations model

Foundations for the New Keynesian Model. Lawrence J. Christiano

+ τ t R t 1B t 1 + M t 1. = R t 1B t 1 + M t 1. = λ t (1 + γ f t + γ f t v t )

investment M. R. Grasselli EPOG Seminar Paris Nord, November 18, 2016

Vr Vr

Learning in Macroeconomic Models

GARCH Models Estimation and Inference. Eduardo Rossi University of Pavia

THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN UNKNOWN DEBT TARGET

Problem Set 4. Graduate Macro II, Spring 2011 The University of Notre Dame Professor Sims

macroeconomics M. R. Grasselli University of Technology Sydney, February 21, 2013

Expectations, Learning and Macroeconomic Policy

OHSx XM521 Multivariable Differential Calculus: Homework Solutions 14.1

Th n nt T p n n th V ll f x Th r h l l r r h nd xpl r t n rr d nt ff t b Pr f r ll N v n d r n th r 8 l t p t, n z n l n n th n rth t rn p rt n f th v

ERRATA. Interest and Prices, Princeton University Press, updated February 2, 2008

Optimal investment strategies for an index-linked insurance payment process with stochastic intensity

Technical appendices: Business cycle accounting for the Japanese economy using the parameterized expectations algorithm

Monetary Economics: Solutions Problem Set 1

Weak convergence and Brownian Motion. (telegram style notes) P.J.C. Spreij

COMPANION APPENDIX TO Fiscal Consolidation with Tax Evasion and Corruption (not intended for publication)

Nonlinear DSGE model with Asymmetric Adjustment Costs under ZLB:

On the Mechanics of New-Keynesian Models


n r t d n :4 T P bl D n, l d t z d th tr t. r pd l

Escaping the Great Recession 1

ADVANCED MACROECONOMICS I

Why Nonlinear/Non-Gaussian DSGE Models?

Critical Region of the QCD Phase Transition

Estimating a Nonlinear New Keynesian Model with the Zero Lower Bound for Japan

macroeconomics M. R. Grasselli Research in Options, December 10, 2012

Brownian Motion. 1 Definition Brownian Motion Wiener measure... 3

3 The Life Cycle, Tax Policy,

Financial Frictions and Credit Spreads. Ke Pang Pierre L. Siklos Wilfrid Laurier University

Corporate Finance Data & The Role of Dynamic Panels. Mark Flannery, University of Florida Kristine W. Hankins, University of Kentucky

The transmission mechanism How the monetary-policy instrument affects the economy and the target variables

CREDIT SEARCH AND CREDIT CYCLES

Colby College Catalogue

New Keynesian Model Walsh Chapter 8

A DSGE Model for an Emerging Open Economy Oil-Producer: Foreign Exchange Interventions as a Policy Instrument

ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 2016: SOLUTIONS. = lim. F n

THE ZERO LOWER BOUND: FREQUENCY, DURATION,

. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Wednesday March 30 ± ǁ

22 t b r 2, 20 h r, th xp t d bl n nd t fr th b rd r t t. f r r z r t l n l th h r t rl T l t n b rd n n l h d, nd n nh rd f pp t t f r n. H v v d n f

Economic and VAR Shocks: What Can Go Wrong?

CSSS/STAT/SOC 321 Case-Based Social Statistics I. Levels of Measurement

DSGE Model Forecasting

Looking for the stars

K e sub x e sub n s i sub o o f K.. w ich i sub s.. u ra to the power of m i sub fi ed.. a sub t to the power of a

Nonlinear Control Systems

The non-negative constraint on the nominal interest rate and the effects of monetary policy

Getting to page 31 in Galí (2008)

Small Open Economy. Macroeconomic Theory, Lecture 9. Adam Gulan. February Bank of Finland

Homework 3 - Partial Answers

Money in the utility model

The L-Shaped Method. Operations Research. Anthony Papavasiliou 1 / 44

Hybrid inflation with a non-minimally coupled scalar field

Macroeconomics Qualifying Examination

Estimating Macroeconomic Models of Financial Crises: An Endogenous Regime Switching Approach


Autonomous Helicopter Landing A Nonlinear Output Regulation Perspective

0 t b r 6, 20 t l nf r nt f th l t th t v t f th th lv, ntr t n t th l l l nd d p rt nt th t f ttr t n th p nt t th r f l nd d tr b t n. R v n n th r

Imperfect Information and Optimal Monetary Policy

GARCH Models Estimation and Inference

Transcription:

R k E 1 χ E Wt E n E t+1 t t + 1 n E t+1 = ( 1 χ E) W E t+1 c E t+1 = χ E Wt+1 E t + 1 q t K t Rt+1 E 1 Γ E t+1 Π t+1 = P t+1 /P t W E t+1 = ( 1 Γ E t+1 ) R E t+1q t K t Π t+1 Γ E t+1 K t q t q t K t j (, 1)

n E t b t = q t K t n E t t t + 1 ωt+1r E t+1 E Rt+1 E ωt+1 E iid E{ωt+1} E = 1 σt E = σ E ςt E ςt E ω E t+1 ω E Ft+1 E = F E (ω E t+1 t+1) = f E (ωt+1)dω E t+1 E f E ( ) t t+1 (1 δ) q t+1 t R E t+1 = rk t+1 + (1 δ) q t+1 q t Π t+1 ω E t+1 = Z tb t R E t+1q t K t = xe t R E t+1 x E t Z t b t /(q t K t ) ω E t+1 Rt+1 E ωt+1r E t+1q E t K t µ E

ω E t+1rt+1q E t K t (ωt+1 E ω E t+1)rt+1q E t K t Rt+1q E t K t Γ E t+1 = Γ E (ω E t+1) ω E t+1 ω E t+1f(ω E t+1)dω E t+1 + ( 1 F E t+1) ω E t+1 1 Γ E t+1 G E t+1 = G E (ω E t+1) ω E t+1 ω E t+1f E (ω E t+1)dω E t+1 {[ ( )] x E t 1 Γ E E t R Et+1q } Rt+1 E t K t R E t+1 n B t d t n B t + d t = b t. n B t ϕ t b t ϕ t R F t+1 = ( Γ E t+1 µ E G E t+1 ) R E t+1q t K t b t

E t { (1 Γ F t+1 ) [ Γ E ( x Ej t Rt+1 E ) µ E G E ( )] } x Ej t R Et+1q Rt+1 E t K t ϕ t E t { R B t+1 (q t K t n E t ) } 1 Γ F t+1 x E t K t+1 E t { Γ E t+1 + ξ t ( 1 Γ F t+1 ) ( Γ E t+1 µ E G E t+1) } = E t { ( 1 Γ E t+1) R E t+1 + ξ t [( 1 Γ F t+1 ) ( Γ E t+1 µ E G E t+1) R E t+1 ϕ t R B t+1] } = ξ t 1 χ B W B t n B t+1 t t + 1 n B t+1 = ( 1 χ B) W B t+1

c E t+1 = χ B W E t+1 R B t+1 W B t+1 = RB t+1n B t Π t+1. R B t+1 R B t+1 = ( ) 1 Γ F t+1 R F t+1 b t n B t 1 Γ F t+1 i ω F i t+1 i t + 1 Ξ F t+1 = max [ ω F t+1r F t+1b t R D t d t, ] ω F t+1 ω F t+1r F t+1b t = R D t d t R D t d t Ξ F t+1 = max [ ω F t+1 ω F t+1, ] R F t+1b t ω F t+1 E{ω F t+1} = 1 σ F t = σ F ς F t ς F t Ft F ω F Ft+1 F = F F (ω F t+1 t+1) f(ωt+1)dω F t+1 F G F t+1 = G F (ω F t+1) ω F t+1 ω F t+1f(ω F t+1)dω F t+1

µ F Rt+1b F t max [ ω F t+1 ω F t+1, ] = ω F t+1 = 1 Γ F t+1 ω F t+1f(ω F t+1)dω F t+1 ω F t+1 ω F t+1 f(ω F t+1)dω F t+1 Γ F t+1 = Γ F (ω F t+1) ω E t+1 ωt+1f(ω F t+1)dω F t+1 F + ( ) 1 Ft F ω F t+1 Ξ F t+1 = (1 Γ F t+1)r F t+1b t. Π ϕ τ R τ Π τ b R t R = ( Rt R ) τr ( Πt Π ) τπ ( ) τb bt b R t = R D t ϕ t ϕ = ( ) ζb bt b

max c tl td t E t [ ] β t+s ln c t+s φ l1+η t+s 1 + η s= < β < 1 c t l t φ η c t l t d t c t + d t + t t w t l t + RD t d t Π t + Ξ K t t t w t R D t t Π t = P t /P t Ξ K t w t = φl η t /Λ t 1 = E t { βt,t+1 R D t+1/π t+1 } βt,t+s = β t+s Λ t+s Λ t Λ t = 1/c t Y it i (, 1) P it Y t P t Y it P t Y t 1 Y itp it i Y t = ( 1 Y ε ε it i) ε ε ε > 1 i Yit d = (P it /P t ) ε Y t P t = ( 1 P 1 ε it di) 1 1 ε

P t = P it Y it = A t Kitl α 1 α it < α < 1 A t K it l it P it Y it P t r K t K it w t l it r K t w t l it = (1 α)s it Y it r K t K it = αs it Y it s it s t = w1 α t (rt K ) α 1 α α (1 α) 1 α i P it A t maxe t P it s= [ β t+s P it+s Yit+s d κ ( p P t+s 2 Π λp t P it P it 1 ) 2 ( Y it+s + s t+s Yit+s Yit+s) ] d κ p > λ p 1 Π t P it P t κ p Π t Π λp t ( Π t Π λp t 1 ) = εs t (ε 1) + κ p E t { β t,t+1 Π t+1 Π λp t ( Π t+1 κ p λ p = Π λp t 1 ) Y t+1 Y t } {I t } t= E t s= β t,t+s [q t+s x t+s I t+s ]

x t = K t (1 δ)k t = [ 1 κ I 2 δ κ I ( ) ] 2 It 1 I t I t ( 2 I t 2 I t 1) 1 = q t [ +E t { 1 κ I 2 ( ) 2 ( ) It It It 1 κ I 1 I t I t q t+1 β t,t+1 κ I ( It+1 I t 1 ) ( ) } 2 It+1 I t I t ] Y t = c t + χ E W E t + χ B W B t + I t + κ I 2 ( It I t 1 ) 2 I t + µ E G E t R E t q t K t Π t + µ F G F t Rt F b t Π t (1 α) s t Y t l t = φ tl η t Λ t R t ϕ t R t = Rt D {l t K t I t c t Y t n E t b t n B t d t x E t } t= {w t rt K q t Π t s t } t= {Rt F Rt E Rt B } t= {R t ϕ t } t= {A t ςt E ςt F } t= ln A t = ρ A ln A t + ε A t,

< ρ A < 1 ε A t iid σ A ωt+1 E ωt+1 F σt E = σ E ςt E ln ς E t ln ς F t = ρ E ln ς E t + ε E t = ρ F ln ς F t + ε F t < ρ E < 1 < ρ F < 1 σ E ς σ F ς iid ε E t ε F t ω E ω F µ E χ E σ E σ F F F A = ς E = ς F = 1 l = 1 φ β.99 R = 1 = 1.1.99 2% η = 1 1 1 φ =.749 α =.35 δ =.25 φ =.7624

ε = 6 ε ε = 1.2 κ p = 3 κ I = 2.43 R k Π = 1.5 2 ϱ qk n E 2 υ E = RE R D 2 F E =.75 3% 8% ϕ =.8 υ B = RB R D 6 µ F =.3 2% ω E =.498 µ E = 9% σ E =.271 χ E =.18 ω F =.92 σ F χ B =.25 =.14 1.36% µ F > µ E µ F

χ B.28.3 F F.4%.9% 2.7% R D R R F R E R F R B ϕ R B ln A t ln ς t 6 j=1 (xm j x d j) 2 x m j j x m j ρ A =.8638 ρ ς =.833 σ A =.716 σ E ς =.867

τ b = ζ b > ϕ τ b > ζ b = τ Π ζ b τ Π τ b (ζ b, τ Π ) ζ b = ζ b ζ b ζ b

τ b τ b τ π Π ϕ Π ϕ ζ b ϕ

Z t Z = ( Zt Z ) τr ( Πt Π ) τπ ( ) τb bt b R t = (Z t, 1) Z t R t ζ b [, 11] ζ b [12, 2] τ b [,.9] τ R = τ π =.9 τ π = 1.2

ω F ζ b ζ b 13 ζ b ζ b = 2 3% ζ b > ω F

ζ b = τ b τ b =

τ R ρ R = 1 { } W t = E t β s U (c t+s, 1 l t+s ), s= W t = U (c t, 1 l t ) + βe t {W t+1 }. { E t β [ s U ( )] } { (1 ω) c A t+s, 1 lt+s A = E t β [ s U ( c B t+s, 1 lt+s)] } B, s= s= ω 1 ζ b = τ b =.99

R D = Π β q = 1 R E = R D υ E R B = R D υ B r K = [ RE Π s = ε K = ε + κp [ ( 1 1 r K A α s (1 δ)]q ε (1 β) ( Π 1 λp 1 ) Π 1 λp ) ] 1 l α α I = δk ( ) Y = 1 r K α s K ( ) F E = 1 Φ ln ω E + 1 2(σ E ) 2 ω E σ E σ ( ) E G E ln ω = Φ E 2(σ 1 E ) 2 σ ( E ) G E = 1 Φ ln ω E 1 2(σ E ) 2 ω E σ E σ E Γ E = G E + ω E (1 F E ) Γ E = G E ( + (1 F E ) ) ω E F E G F ln ω = Φ F 1 2(σ F ) 2 σ F Γ F = ( 1 F F ) ω F + G F ξ = Γ E (1 Γ F )(Γ E µ E G E ) n E = (1 χ E ) ( 1 Γ E) R E qk Π b = qk n E R F = ϕ 1 Γ F R B n B = ϕb χ B = 1 β υ B c = Y χ E ( 1 Γ E) R E qk Π w = (1 α) s Y l φ = w cl η d = b n B x E = ω E R E χb RB n B Π µe G E RE qk Π µf G F RF b Π ω E µ E σ E χ E ω F σ F F F R D R E R B q r K s K I Y w G E Γ E G E F E Γ E ξ n E b n B d x E χ B R F G F Γ F c φ

= + 1 β (1 χe ) ( 1 Γ E) υ E ϱ E = Γ E + ξ E ( 1 Γ F ) ( Γ E µ E G E ) = = ( 1 Γ E) R E + ξ [( 1 Γ F ) ( ( ) Γ E µ E G E) R E ϕr B] = F E ln(ω + Φ E )+ 1 2(σ E ) 2 σ E = ω F + (1 ( ϕ) RD R F = F F + Φ ln(ω F )+ 1 2(σ F ) 2 σ F ) = R B + ( 1 Γ F ) 1 ϕ RF ω E µ E σ E χ E ω F σ F F F

β =.99 η = 1 φ =.7624 α =.35 δ =.25 ε = 6 κ p = 3 κ I = 2.43 σ A =.716 ρ A =.8638 σ ς =.867 ρ ς =.833 Π = 1.5

ϱ qk n E = 2 υ E RE R D = 1.5 4F E = 3 υ B RB R D = 1.15 ϕ =.8 µ F =.3 ω E =.498 χ E =.18 µ E =.9 σ E =.271 ω F =.92 σ F =.14 4F F = 1.36 χ B =.25 R = 1.151 R D = 1.151 R F = 1.164 R E = 1.22 R B = 1.34

τ R τ π τ b ζ b W ω ω

2 1.8 Multiple Unique Explosive Coefficient on inflation (τπ) 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.8.6.4.2 5 1 15 Coefficient on lending (ζ b ) τ b = ζ b > 2 1.8 Multiple Unique Explosive Coefficient on inflation (τπ) 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.8.6.4.2.2.4.6.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Coefficient on lending (τ b ) τ b > ζ b =

ϕ = 12% 2 1.8 Multiple Unique Explosive Coefficient on inflation (τπ) 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.8.6.4.2 5 1 15 Coefficient on lending (ζ b ) τ b = ζ b > ϕ = 12% Monetary policy rate Output Investment Inflation.2.4.6.2.4.6.8.2 15 2 2 4 6 8 15 2 15 2.5.5 15 2 Return on capital 5 5 15 2 Entrep. net worth 5 5 2 15 2 Piecewise Linear 3 2 1 Bank net worth 15 2 Linear (ignores ZLB) Nominal loan growth 2 1.5 1.5 15 2 ζ b

1 Monetary policy rate.8.6 Ann.ppt.4.2 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 Quarters ζ =12 b ζ =16 b ζ =2 b τ π =.9 Monetary policy rate Output Investment Inflation.5.5 2.1.2.3.5.5 2 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 Return on capital.5.5 2 2.5 5 1 Entrep. net worth.5 2 2.5 3 5 1 Piecewise Linear Bank net worth 5 4 3 2 1 5 1 Linear (ignores ZLB) Nominal loan growth.5.4.3 5 1 ζ b

τ π =.9.5.5 Monetary policy rate 2.5.35.4.45.5.55 Output.5 Investment.2.4.6.8 2 2.2.5 Inflation.5.5 2 2.5.5 Return on capital Entrep. net worth 3.1.6 Bank net worth Nominal loan growth.7.5 2 2.5.5 3.2 3.3 3.4.5 Piecewise Linear.5.4.3.5 Linear (ignores ZLB).6.5.4.5 τ b

τ π = 2.5 ζ b τ π = 1.2 τ π = 2.5 Monetary policy rate Output Investment Inflation.4.2.5.6.7.8.9.1.2.3.4.2.2.4 15 2 15 2 15 2 15 2.2.4.6 Return on capital.1.2.3.4 Entrep. net worth 15 2 15 2 15 2 Piecewise Linear Linear (ignores ZLB) 8 7 6 Bank net worth Nominal loan growth.34.32.3.28.26 15 2 ζ b τ π =.75

τ π =.75.5 Monetary policy rate.1.2.3 Output.5.5 Investment.5.5 Inflation 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 Return on capital Entrep. net worth Bank net worth 5.5.5 4 2 3.5 2.5 2 3 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 Piecewise Linear Linear (ignores ZLB) Nominal loan growth.45.4.35.3 5 1 ζ b τ π =.75.5 Monetary policy rate.5.35.4.45.5 Output.55.5.4.6.8 Investment 2.5 Inflation.5.5.5 Return on capital.8.2.4.6.8 Entrep. net worth 3.1 3.2 3.3.6.5.4 Bank net worth Nominal loan growth.55.5.45.4.35.5.5 Piecewise Linear.5 Linear (ignores ZLB).5 τ b

Monetary policy rate Output Investment Inflation.5.5 2.1.2.3.5.5 2 5 1 15 5 1 15 5 1 15 5 1 15 Return on capital Entrep. net worth Bank net worth Nominal loan growth 6.5.5 4 2.4 2 2.5 2 3.3 5 1 15 5 1 15 5 1 15 5 1 15 Piecewise Linear Linear (ignores ZLB) ζ b R t R = ( Rt R ) τr ( Πt Π ) τπ ( ) τb bt /Y t b/y ϕ t ϕ = ( ) ζb bt /Y t b/y

.5.5 2 Monetary policy rate.4.6.8 Output.5 2 2.5 Investment 2 Inflation.5.5.5.5 Return on capital Entrep. net worth Bank net worth Nominal loan growth.5 2 2.5.5 3.2 3.4 3.6.5 Piecewise Linear.6.5.4.3.5 Linear (ignores ZLB) 2.5 2 1.5 1.5.5 τ b