Rationale of NASA Lunar Precursor Robotic Program (LPRP) for the VSE

Similar documents
Lunar Exploration Requirements and Data Acquisition Architectures

Scientific Contributions of Lunar Robotic Precursor Missions

Moon Express Advancing Commerce and Science

Lunar Precursor Robotics Program

NASA: BACK TO THE MOON

Mini-RF: An Imaging Radar for the Moon. Ben Bussey The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

DARPA Lunar Study: Reducing the technical risk associated with lunar resource utilization and lunar surface presence

Malapert Mountain: A Recommended Site for a South Polar Outpost

Plans for an International Lunar Network

The Moon: Stepping Stone to the Planets

Accessing the Lunar Poles for Human Exploration Missions

InSight Spacecraft Launch for Mission to Interior of Mars

The Moon's Dark, Icy Poles

Lunar Flashlight Project

Exploring the Moon & Asteroids: A Synergistic Approach

SCIENCE WITH DIRECTED AERIAL DR. ALEXEY PANKINE GLOBAL AEROSPACE CORPORATION SAILING THE PLANETS

The Final Minute: Results from the LCROSS Solar Viewing NIR Spectrometer

Results of the LEAG GAP-SAT 1 and 2. Examination of SKGs for a Moon first scenario for human exploration of the Solar System

Lunar Poles. Status of Understanding a Potential Resource. Paul G. Lucey

James Carpenter, Lunar Lander Office, Directorate of Human Spaceflight and Operations

HEOMD Overview March 16, 2015

Upgraded Program of Russian Lunar Landers: Studying of Lunar Poles

NEXT STEPS ON THE MOON REPORT OF THE SPECIFIC ACTION TEAM

Water and Hydrogen Resources on the Moon, Mercury, and Mars*

Conducting Subsurface Surveys for Water Ice using Ground Penetrating Radar and a Neutron Spectrometer on the Lunar Electric Rover Never Stop

Thermal Wadis: Using Regolith for Thermal Energy Management

Robotic Site Survey for ISRU

E X O M A R S. The ESA/NASA ExoMars Programme

Expanding Science with SmallSats/CubeSats

Today s Class. Results for Exam #2 11/7/2017. Today s Class: Robotic & Human Exploration of Mars

Appendix D. Thermal Modelling of Luna 27 Landing Site. Hannah Rana Vito Laneve Philipp Hager Thierry Tirolien (ESA/ESTEC, The Netherlands)

Mian Abbas, Jim Spann, Andre LeClair NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL

Robotic Lunar Exploration Scenario JAXA Plan

SAILING THE PLANETS: PLANETARY EXPLORATION FROM GUIDED BALLOONS. 7 th Annual Meeting of the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts

Impact Mission (AIM) ESA s NEO Exploration Precursor. Ian Carnelli, Andrés Gàlvez Future Preparation and Strategic Studies Office ESA HQ

mission status & ISRU related activity in Japan

Human Lunar Exploration Mission Architectures

Lunar Discovery and Exploration program

Lunar Outpost Site Selection: A Review of the past 20 Years John E. Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center

Thermal, Thermophysical, and Compositional Properties of the Moon Revealed by the Diviner Lunar Radiometer

ORION/MOONRISE: JOINT HUMAN-ROBOTIC LUNAR SAMPLE RETURN MISSION CONCEPT

Rationale for a Geophysics & Geodesy Payload for Lunar Networks

Moon and Mercury 3/8/07

Lunar Knowledge Requirements for Human Exploration

Overview of Lunar Science Objectives. Opportunities and guidelines for future missions.

Dive In What is an advantage of sending unmanned crafts to space?

Mercury = Hermes Mythology. Planet Mercury, Element, Mercredi God of Commerce, Messenger God, guide to Hades Winged sandals and staff

Chandrayaan Mission Objectives and future lunar programs

General Assembly. United Nations A/AC.105/C.2/L.271/Add.2

Life in the Solar System

Human Spaceflight Value Study Was the Shuttle a Good Deal?

THE EUROPEAN LUNAR LANDER: ROBOTIC OPERATIONS IN A HARSH ENVIRONMENT

Scale: Mars is 6,787 km in diameter. Image 1. What is the feature across the middle? What do you think the circles on the left side are?

2024 Mars Sample Return Design Overview

The Main Point. Basic Properties of Mars. Observations. Lecture #19: Mars

Constellation Program Office Tier 1 Regions of Interest for Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Imaging

James L. Green Director, Planetary Science NASA

LEAG Illumination Modeling at the Lunar Poles and its Benefits to Exploration and Science Investigations

The Path to Mars. December Matthew Duggan. Copyright 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.

SMART-1 lunar highlights

NASA Lunar Science Activities. Lunar Science and Exploration

INTERNATIONAL SPACE UNIVERSITY TEAM PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM. Proposed by (name): Al Globus, Chris Cassell, Stephen Covey, Jim Luebke, and Mark Sonter

Iron and Titanium: Important Elements. posted October 20, References:

Volatiles (H, C, N, F, S, Cl) in the lunar mantle, crust, and regolith: What questions remain and where to go next?

Terrestrial Atmospheres

GLEX x12501 FEASIBILITY AND DEFINITION OF A LUNAR POLAR VOLATILES PROSPECTING MISSION

A Lander for Marco Polo

Mission Overview. EAGLE: Study Goals. EAGLE: Science Goals. Mission Architecture Overview

Mars Program Re-Planning 2012

Advanced Probes for Planetary Surface and Subsurface Exploration

A Day in the Life of the Constellation Arcitecture Teamlunar (CxAT-lunar) Science Team

MOON AGE AND REGOLITH EXPLORER MISSION DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE 2017 Annual Technical Symposium

Europe to the Moon. BHF 10 Feb 2005 SPC

Deimos and Phobos as Destinations for Human Exploration

Stas Barabash 1 Yoshifumi Futaana 1 and the SELMA Team. Swedish Institute of Space Physics Kiruna, Sweden. DAP, Boulder, January, 2017

Moonstruck: Illuminating Early Planetary History

The time period while the spacecraft is in transit to lunar orbit shall be used to verify the functionality of the spacecraft.

MARYLAND. The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: UMd Exploration Initiative U N I V E R S I T Y O F.

Exercise 1: Earth s Moon

Where we are now. The Moon Chapters 8.2, 9. Topography. Outline

Paper Session II-B - The Mars Environmental Survey (MESUR) Network and Pathfinder Missions

Technology Goals for Small Bodies

What is there in thee, moon, That thou shouldst move My heart so potently? By John Keats

The Moon: A New Destination For Humanity

Parametric Design MARYLAND. The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: Project Diana U N I V E R S I T Y O F.

Ludwig Combrinck HartRAO 3rd Space Geodesy Workshop 16 March 2009 Matjiesfontein

Asteroid Sample Return and the Path to Exploration of Near-Earth Space* By Dante S. Lauretta 1

Activity #1 - Getting Started in Mars Exploration

Announcements. Mid-term results. Mid-term went very well. Results. PYTS/ASTR 206 Terrestrial planet atmospheres % 17

Activity 7 At a Glance

LRO-LOLA: Measurements of Lunar Altimetry and Surface Conditions

Parametric Design MARYLAND. The Design Process Level I Design Example: Low-Cost Lunar Exploration U N I V E R S I T Y O F

DESING AND ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE SOLAR PANEL GRADUATION PROJECT. Büşra ÇATALBAŞ. Department of Astronautical Engineering

Technologies for Transparency Dynamic Open Data Publishing with Open APIs

SATELLITES: ACTIVE WORLDS AND EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS. Jessica Bolda Chris Gonzalez Crystal Painter Natalie Innocenzi Tyler Vasquez.

Mars Sample Return Mission

MARS. The Red Planet

HERA MISSION & CM16 lessons learned

US Vision of Space Exploration: LRO as a 1 st step. Dr. Jim Garvin Chief Scientist ILC 2005, Toronto, Canada

The Apollo 17 Landing Site. posted February 12, 1997

Transcription:

Rationale of NASA Lunar Precursor Robotic Program (LPRP) for the VSE (vs. I don t need nuthin but a map) Jeff Plescia, Ben Bussey, Paul Spudis, Tony Lavoie Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University Marshall Space Flight Center October 23, 2007 ILEWG Meeting

Considerations Objective: Establishment of outpost site for long-term occupation. sustained human presence on the Moon Environmental considerations (lighting, thermal) may be paramount. Resource potential may be important. Scientific objectives not likely to be a driver. International cooperation, commercial ventures,. Different from Apollo and Mars robotic missions. Raison d etre for lunar outpost must be established. It defines what characteristics are important.

Environment Spatially Independent: Spatially Dependent: Regolith physical properties Chemistry (major element) Dust Surface disturbance on landing Rock frequency Radiation Micrometeoroids Magnetic field*** Atmosphere** Surface charging / levitated dust* Lighting Thermal Topography Communication / Earth View Resources Science Commerce Flight Precision landing Delta V budget Approach over shadowed terrain These are the site discriminators.

What Really Needs to Be Measured at the Moon? Risk Reduction / Cost Control / Optimization Apollo-like Sortie Polar Geodetic control enabling Topography - enabling High-resolution imaging (hazards) - enhancing Non-Polar Nothing enabling High-resolution imaging (hazards) - enhancing Outpost Being There (Just land safely) Polar Topography - enabling Geodetic control enabling Lighting model enhancing High-resolution imaging - enhancing Non-Polar Nothing enabling High-resolution imaging enhancing Global Dust toxicity TBD Electrical charging TBD

Apollo 16: Station 10 ALSEP Regolith Physical Properties

Blowing Regolith - Apollo LM Descent Apollo 11 Initiate: 73-33 m (240-110 ) 75% Obscuration at Touchdown Material moved along surface deflected by rocks Apollo 12 Initiate: 53 m (175 ) Obscuration 12 m (40 ) Surface altered below 9-12 m altitude Apollo 14 Initiate: 33 m (110 ) Erosion of 10 cm 1 m SE of nozzle Apollo 15 Initiate: 45 m (150 ) Obscuration 18 m (60 ) Apollo 16 Initiate: 25 m (80 ) Block and small crater visible to surface Apollo 17 Initiate: 20 m (65 ) No obscuration Evidence of plume interaction with surface across 50 m The amount of material disturbed by the LM descent engine is a strong function of the approach trajectory and speed. Oblique trajectory causes the least disturbance of the surface. Vertical descent ( A15) caused the most disturbance. AS11-40-5920 AS12-47-6906 AS14-66-9261

Dust: <50 µm size fraction consists largely of impact produced glass complicated shapes, jagged edges, large surface area <20 micron size fraction: 20 wt % of soil Dust Different composition from bulk regolith. Impact generated glass and nano-phase Fe increase with decreasing grain size. ~80 wt. % at sizes <10 micron Taylor et al. (2007) and Liu et al. (2007) data on size-frequency distribution of dust-sized material (20 microns-20 nm). Two samples 10084-70051 both display peaks at 100-200 nm >95% are <2 micron A11-10084: 50% of particles are <0.1 micron A11-10084: >40% ultrafine (<100 nm) particles A17-70051: 50% of particles are <0.3 micron

What Really Needs to be Measured at the Moon? Outpost with Resource Utilization Resource distribution (ore characterization) H form, concentration, distribution in polar regions (lighted and shadowed) Highlands composition Pyroclastic composition Regolith physical properties Pyroclastic deposits Permanently shadowed Polar Topography - enabling Geodetic control enabling Lighting model enhancing High-resolution imaging - enhancing Non-Polar High-resolution imaging enhancing Global Dust toxicity TBD Electrical charging TBD

Lunar Robotic Precursor Program Undertake robotic lunar exploration missions that will return data to advance our knowledge of the lunar environment and allow United States (US) exploration architecture objectives to be accomplished earlier and with less cost through application of robotic systems. LPRP will also reduce risk to crew and maximize crew efficiency by accomplishing tasks through precursor robotic missions, and by providing assistance to human explorers on the Moon. Orbital mapping and reconnaissance with Chandrayaan, LRO, et al. Probing the surface with impactors (LCROSS). Exploring and prospecting future habitation sites with surface landers and rovers Emplacing orbital communications and navigation assets to support future missions

Which Resources Are Important? Apollo 11 soil Mare Apollo 16 soil Highlands H 20-100 ppm 4-40 ppm He* 19-80 ppm 3-35 ppm Ar 1.3-12 ppm 0.7-3 ppm Xe 0.5-3.8 ppm 0.2-1 ppm C 100-200 ppm 30-280 ppm N 20-80 ppm 4-200 ppm K 1000-1800 ppm 380-1100 ppm P 480-650 ppm 130-1100 ppm S 660-1500 ppm 470-640 ppm F 75-520 ppm 27-105 ppm Cl 3-40 ppm 12-270 ppm * 4 He/ 3 He = ~ 2500 One cubic meter (1 m 3 ) of lunar regolith contains enough hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, potassium, and other trace elements to make lunch for two two cheese sandwiches on rye, two colas (flavored with real sugar, although there s enough Cl to sweeten it with Splenda instead), and two large plums. (credit: Larry Taylor)

Resource Exploitation Data for Decision in the Critical Path Water ice in shadowed regions of both poles Extract oxygen, metals from lunar materials for construction, propellant Recover solar-wind gases (e.g., hydrogen and other volatiles) implanted on lunar regolith Collect solar energy with photoelectric arrays built from lunar materials and beam energy to Earth or cislunar space

Polar Objectives: Find and characterize resources that make exploration affordable and sustainable Lunar volatiles (e.g., H) Sunlight Landing site morphology Physical Properties Dust Oxidation Potential Radiation Environment / Shielding Field test new equipment, technologies and approaches (e.g., dust and radiation mitigation) Support demonstration, validation, and establishment of heritage of systems for use on human missions Gain operational experience in lunar environments Provide opportunities for industry, educational and international partners

Pyroclastic Deposits Gaddis et al. 2003 Pyroclastic deposits have high H content Apollo 17 orange glass and Apollo 15 green glass highly enriched in volatile elements Black glass contains illmenite enhanced H retention

Resources - H Elphic modeling voodoo Using radar topography, calculate shadowed areas, allow illuminated regions to have up to 200 ppm H, shadowed areas have whatever is necessary to match neutron signature. Concentration is a function of shadow area and whether H is uniformly distributed. Concentrations could be higher if shadowed areas not uniformly filled.

Resources - Ice? Margot et al. Earth-based radar Clementine Bi-Static Experiment

Polar Light Mission Overview Develop common lander to land in sunlight near lunar pole to characterize environment and deposits Lander becomes standard design for delivery of future payloads Sunlight mission answers first-order questions about poles and provides ground truth for orbital sensing Concept of Operations Precision landing & hazard avoidance Characterize sun illumination over a seasonal cycle Direct measurement of neutron flux, soil hydrogen concentration in sunlit area for correlation with orbital mapping Biological radiation response characterization Characterize lunar dust and charging environment Possible micro-rover for near-field investigation (if funded separately) Picture/Diagram

Polar Dark Mission Overview Reference concept: fuel cell-powered rover, ranging > 25 km and obtaining > 22 subsurface measurements (each 1,000 m apart) to map and analyze polar volatiles Navigation by integration of coherent ranging with an overhead relay satellite, IMU, and perhaps terrain relative navigation Navigation by flash lamps and MER style hazard avoidance or 3-D scanning LIDAR RTG-powered options are lighter and offer extended life, but are more costly Concept of Operations Rover delivered directly to the crater floor by the lander (which expires shortly after rover egress) Rover traverses to selected sites obtaining ground penetrating radar and neutron spectrometer profiles along the way Sampling at predetermined site, rover drills and samples material approximately every 50 cm to a maximum depth of 2 m On-board analysis of volatile content and composition

Polar Dark Rover Dawes Crater Shadow in Earth-based radar images is Earth-shadow; entire crater floor is in sun-shadow Green NS pixels Red High Radar CPR Orange Permanent sunlight Blue line Rover traverse

Lander / Rover Concepts

ISRU Excavation Rover 1/10 th scale demo

RLEP-2 Lander Performance Summary Arch. 1 Arch. 3 Arch. 6 Arch. 7 Arch. 9C Arch. 9H Arch. 10 small cryo Payload Landed Mass (kg) 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Range of values represents range of payload capacity depending on: Trajectory approach Mass growth from CBE (0-25%) Whether relay satellite is co-launched (Architectures 1,9) Propulsion selected for lander Whether lander hops out of crater (Architecture 10) MSL Viking 645 430, 450 296 Atlas 401 (3580 kg) Direct Landing, Hypergol + Solid LAT Orbit First, Hypergol Luna/ Lunokhod 2 Luna/ Lunokhod 1 Atlas 551 (6560 kg) Note: Added battery mass specific for crater rim mission during eclipse is counted as payload mass for this comparison (130-156 kg) 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 1351 987 917 888 614 565 Injected Mass (kg) Orbit First, Cryogenic 2003 1622 1326 724 Delta IV H (9615 kg) Off Graph: Surveyor (1006, 41) MER (1063, 174) Apollo 15 (46,838, 4971) (Assumes ascent vehicle is landed payload)

Summary Precursor robotic missions to the Moon Better define the environment Reduces risk Increases efficiency Resource trades (e.g., proximity to sunlight for power and water for fuel) Don t want to have to move the outpost. Most important objectives: Characterize new or poorly understood processes and environments (e.g., lunar poles) Pre-reconnaissance of targets for future human exploration Resource prospecting Robotic missions have other important programmatic uses beyond science; scientific exploration can be opportunistic

Robotic Precursor Missions Starting no later than 2008, initiate a series of robotic missions to the Moon to prepare for and support future human exploration activities (NSPD-31) Robotic missions: Provide early strategic information for human missions Key knowledge needed for human safety and mission success Infrastructure elements for eventual human use Data will be used to plan and execute human exploration of the Moon Resolve the unknowns of the lunar polar regions Knowledge of the environment temperature, lighting, etc. Resources/deposits composition and physical nature Terrain and surface properties - dust characterization Emplace support infrastructure navigation/communication, beacons, teleoperated robots Make exploration more capable and sustainable Emplace surface systems Demonstrate new technologies that will enable settlement Operational experience in lunar environment Create new opportunities for scientific investigation