Hopping transport in disordered solids

Similar documents
QUANTUM TRANSPORT. KUBO S FORMULA for. Jean BELLISSARD 1 2. Collaborations:

DISSIPATIVE TRANSPORT APERIODIC SOLIDS KUBO S FORMULA. and. Jean BELLISSARD 1 2. Collaborations:

A mathematical model for Mott s Variable Range Hopping

PHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008.

CHM 532 Notes on Creation and Annihilation Operators

d 3 r d 3 vf( r, v) = N (2) = CV C = n where n N/V is the total number of molecules per unit volume. Hence e βmv2 /2 d 3 rd 3 v (5)

Automorphic Equivalence Within Gapped Phases

Quantum Brownian motion induced by thermal noise in the presence of disorder. Wells Hall, 619 Red Cedar Road, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA b)

Anderson Localization Looking Forward

Lecture 2: Open quantum systems

DISSIPATIVE DYNAMICS IN SEMICONDUCTORS AT LOW TEMPERATURE

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

16. GAUGE THEORY AND THE CREATION OF PHOTONS

561 F 2005 Lecture 14 1

Quantum Mechanics I Physics 5701

Assignment 8. Tyler Shendruk December 7, 2010

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 5

Lecture 12. The harmonic oscillator

Geometry and Physics. Amer Iqbal. March 4, 2010

Introduction to Theory of Mesoscopic Systems

INTEGER QUANTUM HALL EFFECT

Outline for Fundamentals of Statistical Physics Leo P. Kadanoff

Diffusion of wave packets in a Markov random potential

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

ORIGINS. E.P. Wigner, Conference on Neutron Physics by Time of Flight, November 1956

σ 2 + π = 0 while σ satisfies a cubic equation λf 2, σ 3 +f + β = 0 the second derivatives of the potential are = λ(σ 2 f 2 )δ ij, π i π j

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

4.3 Lecture 18: Quantum Mechanics

Localization I: General considerations, one-parameter scaling

The semiclassical. model for adiabatic slow-fast systems and the Hofstadter butterfly

Quantum mechanics in one hour

Charge carrier statistics/shot Noise

PHY 396 K. Problem set #7. Due October 25, 2012 (Thursday).

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics PVK - Solutions. Nicolas Lanzetti

On the Heisenberg and Schrödinger Pictures

Quantum Mechanics II

1 Quantum field theory and Green s function

Lecture 6 Photons, electrons and other quanta. EECS Winter 2006 Nanophotonics and Nano-scale Fabrication P.C.Ku

2.1 Green Functions in Quantum Mechanics

Fluctuation theorem in systems in contact with different heath baths: theory and experiments.

Quantum measurement theory and micro-macro consistency in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics

Fractional exclusion statistics: A generalised Pauli principle

Attempts at relativistic QM

2 Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field

Dynamical Collapse in Quantum Theory

INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS by Lawrence R. Mead, Prof. Physics, USM

On solving many-body Lindblad equation and quantum phase transition far from equilibrium

Non-Markovian Quantum Dynamics of Open Systems: Foundations and Perspectives

Mixing Quantum and Classical Mechanics: A Partially Miscible Solution

Braid Group, Gauge Invariance and Topological Order

Non-equilibrium phase transitions

10. Zwanzig-Mori Formalism

An Effective Potential Approach to Modelling 25nm MOSFET Devices S. Ahmed 1 C. Ringhofer 2 D. Vasileska 1

Spin-Boson Model. A simple Open Quantum System. M. Miller F. Tschirsich. Quantum Mechanics on Macroscopic Scales Theory of Condensed Matter July 2012

where P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation

Cluster structure of quantum Coxeter Toda system

Quantum Light-Matter Interactions

Relational time and intrinsic decoherence

OIST, April 16, 2014

Classical and quantum simulation of dissipative quantum many-body systems

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 1 Nov 2011

Introduction to Theory of Mesoscopic Systems. Boris Altshuler Columbia University & NEC Laboratories America

Simple one-dimensional potentials

STATIONARY NON EQULIBRIUM STATES F STATES FROM A MICROSCOPIC AND A MACROSCOPIC POINT OF VIEW

Quantum Mechanics C (130C) Winter 2014 Assignment 7

Introduction to Theory of Mesoscopic Systems

7.4. Why we have two different types of materials: conductors and insulators?

Heat full statistics: heavy tails and fluctuations control

. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Wednesday March 30 ± ǁ

Bose Gases, Bose Einstein Condensation, and the Bogoliubov Approximation

Phonons (Classical theory)

On the quantum Boltzmann equation

Stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger equations and modulation of solitary waves

Floquet Topological Insulator:

PHY 396 K. Problem set #3. Due September 29, 2011.

Exercises : Questions

The dynamics of small particles whose size is roughly 1 µmt or. smaller, in a fluid at room temperature, is extremely erratic, and is

SECOND QUANTIZATION. notes by Luca G. Molinari. (oct revised oct 2016)

From Particles to Fields

Concepts for Specific Heat

Quantum Physics Lecture 9

Anderson Localization Theoretical description and experimental observation in Bose Einstein-condensates

ELEMENTS OF PROBABILITY THEORY

Multipartite entanglement in fermionic systems via a geometric

Newton s Method and Localization

Stabilization of second order evolution equations with unbounded feedback with delay

POSTULATES OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

1.1 Creation and Annihilation Operators in Quantum Mechanics

Consider a system of n ODEs. parameter t, periodic with period T, Let Φ t to be the fundamental matrix of this system, satisfying the following:

The asymmetric KMP model

Potential Theory on Wiener space revisited

Solution Set 3. Hand out : i d dt. Ψ(t) = Ĥ Ψ(t) + and

SECOND QUANTIZATION. Lecture notes with course Quantum Theory

C. Show your answer in part B agrees with your answer in part A in the limit that the constant c 0.

Gauge invariant quantum gravitational decoherence

Typicality paradigm in Quantum Statistical Thermodynamics Barbara Fresch, Giorgio Moro Dipartimento Scienze Chimiche Università di Padova

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics

Decay analysis with reservoir structures. Barry M Garraway

Quantum Quenches in Extended Systems

Transcription:

Hopping transport in disordered solids Dominique Spehner Institut Fourier, Grenoble, France Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 1

Outline of the talk Hopping transport Models for electron-phonon interactions Link with classical Markov processes Random walk in a random environment Joint work with: J. Bellissard, A. Faggionato, H. Schulz-Baldes, R. Rebolledo Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 2

Outline of the talk Hopping transport Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 3

Anderson localization H = + V ω = electron Hamiltonian in a disordered solid. The low energy part of spect(h) is a.s. pure point, H ψ i = E i ψ i, E i [, ] The eigenfunctions ψ i are exponentially localized around random points x i R d. At low temperature k B T, the relevant states for transport are close to the Fermi level E F = 0 Energy Valence band (empty) E F kt H e = P [, ] HP [, ] Conduction band (full) spect(h e ) pure point (a.s.) Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 4

Coupling with phonons Apply to the solid a small constant electric field E H e H e,e = H e + EX, X= position operator. spect(h e,e ) a.c. with resonances E i (E) close to R-axis. electons in perturbed states ψ i (E) remain localized no transport! At temperature T > 0: coupling with phonons allows for electronic jumps between the localized states ψ i (E) Energie Ε F Ε Mott Ε i Ε j distance hopping transport r Mott Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 5

Conductivity σ β Let E j E i k B T, x i x j 1 = localization length. Jump rate from ψ i to ψ j : γ i j e x i x j e β max{e j E i,0} Effective jump rate (Mean Field): c i j = γ i j f i (1 f j ) f i = ( e β(e i µ) + 1 ) 1 = mean of electrons in ψi for E = 0 Ε F Energie Ε Mott Ε i r Mott c i j e x i x j e β( E i E j + E i + E j ) Ε j distance Optimal jumps for x i x j r Mott and E i E j ɛ Mott, r Mott = const. β 1/(d+1) ɛ Mott = const. β d/(d+1) (const. depends on DOS at E F ). } Mott law: σ β σ 0 exp { const.β 1 d+1, β 1 [Mott 68] Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 6

Outline of the talk Hopping transport Models for electron-phonon interactions Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 7

Electron dynamics (exact) Electron Hamiltonian Ĥe = i E i a i a i (2 nd quantization) Electronic observables A e belong to a CAR algebra A e = C -algebra generated by the creation op. a i = a (ψ i ). Electron-phonon interaction Hamiltonian (for N atoms): Ĥ e ph = λ ( ) νq ê iqx b q + b q N b q q = creation op. of a longitudinal acoustic phonon with momentum q and frequency ν q = c s q λ = coupling constant. Assume the phonons are in state ω ph at time t = 0 and are uncorrelated with the electrons ( ) A e (t) = ω ph e it(ĥ e +Ĥ ph +Ĥ e ph ) A e 1 ph e it(ĥ e +Ĥ ph +Ĥ e ph ). Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 8

Van Hove limit (weak coupling) Phonons = bath at equilibrium with inv. temperature β initial state ω ph = β-kms state for free bosons. Van Hove limit: λ 0, t = λ 2 τ [Davies 74] A e (λ 2 τ) e τ(l e+d) (A e ) 0. Liouvillian : L e (A e ) = i [ Ĥ e, A e ] D(A e ) = i j = Lindblad generator commutes with L e γ i j ( a i a ja e a j a i 1 2 { }) a i a i a j a j, A e a i, a i = creation & annihilation op. of an electron in state ψ i γ i j = jump rate from ψ i to ψ j as given by Fermi golden rule. Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 9

When is weak coupling OK? Let f, g L 2 (R d, d 3 q), (H ph f)(q) = ω q f(q) b(f) = annihilation op. of a phonon in state f. Phonon correlation time τ c : If f, g are analytic in a strip around the R-axis, the phonon correlation function ( ) ω ph b (f)b(e iτh ph g) = f e iτh ph(e βh ph 1) 1 g decreases exponentially to 0 as τ with a rate 1/τ c. The electron dynamics is well-approximated by the semigroup of completely positive maps (e t(le+d) ) t 0 if (1) τ c t λ 2 τ 1 c (Markov limit + perturbation theory) (2) E λ 2 τ c with E = smallest energy difference E i E j for relevant jumps (adiabatic limit). Here E ɛ Mott, τ c = β λ β (2d+1)/(2d+2). Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 10

Current density j Apply to the solid a small constant electric field E L e L e,e = i[ĥe + E ˆX, ] D D E depends on E. ˆX = i ψ i X ψ j a i a j = 2 nd quantized position op. Solid with finite volume Ω connected to two reservoirs with chemical potentials µ µ. Dynamics in van Hove limit: semigroup (Φ t,e ) t 0 with generator L e,e + D E + electron exchanges with reservoirs Current density: j = 1 Ω lim ϕ ( eq Φt,E (L e,e + D E )( ˆX) ). t }{{} µ i E x = 0 j velocity Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 11 µ

Outline of the talk Hopping transport Models for electron-phonon interactions Link with classical Markov processes Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 12

Invariant commutative algebra Electron Hamiltonian Ĥ e = i I E i a i a i Eigenvectors in Fock space η = i I ( ) a ηi i 0, η {0, 1} I The dissipative part D of the generator commutes with L e = i[ĥe, ] (adiabatic approximation) If (i) Ĥ e has simple eigenvalues (ii) e t(le+d) has a unique stationary state ϕ. Then 1. ker L e = {Ĥe} = commutative invariant algrebra for the semigroup (e t(le+d) ) t 0. ( 2. ϕ Le (A) ) = 0 for any A A e. Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 13

Decoherence Thm : If (i) Ĥ e has simple eigenvalues (ii) e t(le+d) has a unique stationary state ϕ 1. e t(l e+d) { Ĥ e defines a Markov semigroup with generator } ( Lcl f ) ( (η) = η D η f(η ) η η ) η = d dt E η( f(ηt ) ), f C({0, 1} I ) 2. The corresponding Markov process (η t ) t 0 is an exclusion process on {x i } with the jump rates γ i j µ = invariant measure. 3. For any state ϕ and any observable A A e, lim ϕ( e t(le+d) A ) = η A η dµ (η). t Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 14

Classical current Current density: j = 1 Ω lim ϕ ( eq Φt,E (L e,e + D E )( ˆX) ) t = 1 η L cl,e ( Ω ˆX diag,e ) η dµ,e (η) ˆX diag,e = ψ i (E) X ψ i (E) a i (E)a i(e) i E ψ i ψ j j (x i ) <0<(x j ) ( γ i j µ ( ηi (1 η j ) ) ( i j )). see [Miller & Abrahams 60] Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 15

Outline of the talk Hopping transport Models for electron-phonon interactions Link with classical Markov processes Random walk in a random environment Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 16

Random environment Let x i be random distinct points in R d with a stationary and mixing distribution ˆP. N B = points in B R d (B bounded Borel set) E ˆP (N B) = ρ B, ρ = mean density, ρ <. EX : (stationary) Poisson process (i) ˆP(N B = n) = (ρ B ) n e ρ B /n! (ii) the N B are independent for disjoint B s. Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 17

Random environment (2) To each point x i is associated a random energy E i [ 1, 1]. The E i are independent and have all the distribution ν. Pick up (at random) a point among {x i } and choose it as the origin new distribution = Palm distribution ˆP 0 EX : ˆP = stat. Poisson process ˆP 0 is obtained by adding 1 (deterministic) point at x = 0. Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 18

Random walk Configuration of the environment ξ = {x i, E i }. A particle located at X t at time t, starting from X 0 = 0, walks randomly on {x i } : X t Jumps are possible between any pair of points (x i, x j ), with the rate c xi x j = e x i x j e β( E i E j + E i + E j ) β = inverse temperature. Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 19

Random walk (2) X t For a given configuration ξ = {x i, E i } of the environment, let P ξ be the distribution of the Markov process (X t ) t 0. x i x j, t, t 0 0, P ξ (X t0 +t = x j X t0 = x i ) = t c ξ x i x j + O(t 2 ). No explosion if E ˆ P0 (N 2 B ) <. Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 20

Main results Of interest here: diffusion constant Thm 1 : in dimension d 2, 1 D β = lim t t E P 0 (E P ξ(xt 2 )) (i) D β exists and D β > 0 (normal diffusion) (ii) the process Y t = εx tε 2 converges weakly in probability as ε 0 to a Brownian motion W D. Thm 2 : Let d 2, energy distribution s.t. g 0 > 0, α 0, Then ν( E i E) g 0 E 1+α. { ( β exp D β c β (α+1)(d 2) α+1+d (c, β 0 = constants independent of β). β 0 ) α+1 α+1+d } Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 21

Low temperature limit Energy distribution for E 0 : ( β ln D β β 0 ν( E i E) g 0 E 1+α ) α+1 α+1+d, β [Mott 68] (heuristic). [Ambegoakar, Halperin, Langer 71] For β, the jump rates c xi x j = e x i x j e β( E i E j + E i + E j ) fluctuate widely with x i, x j the particle follows with high probability one of the optimal paths. Workshop on Quantum Transport, Lexington, March 17, 2006 p. 22