Studio Exercise Time Response & Frequency Response 1 st -Order Dynamic System RC Low-Pass Filter

Similar documents
Dynamic System Response. Dynamic System Response K. Craig 1

Mechatronics. Time Response & Frequency Response 2 nd -Order Dynamic System 2-Pole, Low-Pass, Active Filter

Exercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System)

Exercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System)

ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques

Steady State Frequency Response Using Bode Plots

Modeling General Concepts

Radar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.

Systems Analysis and Control

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 8 - Solutions. HW 8 - Solutions

Poles and Zeros and Transfer Functions

The requirements of a plant may be expressed in terms of (a) settling time (b) damping ratio (c) peak overshoot --- in time domain

8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance

EECE 301 Signals & Systems Prof. Mark Fowler

16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2

The Frequency-Response

Recursive, Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) Digital Filters:

CHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Response to a pure sinusoid

Chapter 6 - Solved Problems

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 1

Thermal System Closed-Loop Temperature Control

Step Response of First-Order Systems

Overview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piece-wise linear approximations First-order terms Second-order terms (complex poles & zeros)

Homework 7 - Solutions

Problem Weight Score Total 100

Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS

2.161 Signal Processing: Continuous and Discrete

Asymptotic Bode Plot & Lead-Lag Compensator

Systems Analysis and Control

Loop shaping exercise

ME 475/591 Control Systems Final Exam Fall '99

Systems Analysis and Control

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall 2007

Frequency Response. Re ve jφ e jωt ( ) where v is the amplitude and φ is the phase of the sinusoidal signal v(t). ve jφ

MAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008

Review of Linear Time-Invariant Network Analysis

Basic Electronics. Introductory Lecture Course for. Technology and Instrumentation in Particle Physics Chicago, Illinois June 9-14, 2011

ECE3050 Assignment 7

Stability of CL System

Today (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10

Dynamic circuits: Frequency domain analysis

Exercises for lectures 13 Design using frequency methods

Frequency Response Techniques

Chapter 9: Controller design

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design

Homework Assignment 08

Frequency Response part 2 (I&N Chap 12)

EE221 Circuits II. Chapter 14 Frequency Response

ME 375 EXAM #1 Friday, March 13, 2015 SOLUTION

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL

Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions

EE221 Circuits II. Chapter 14 Frequency Response

Stability & Compensation

Process Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040)

Lesson 19: Process Characteristics- 1 st Order Lag & Dead-Time Processes

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. MAE334 - Introduction to Instrumentation and Computers. Final Examination.

LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS. Ali Karimpour Associate Professor Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions

Automatic Control (MSc in Mechanical Engineering) Lecturer: Andrea Zanchettin Date: Student ID number... Signature...

1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise

Solution: K m = R 1 = 10. From the original circuit, Z L1 = jωl 1 = j10 Ω. For the scaled circuit, L 1 = jk m ωl 1 = j10 10 = j100 Ω, Z L

Appendix A: Exercise Problems on Classical Feedback Control Theory (Chaps. 1 and 2)

Homework 11 Solution - AME 30315, Spring 2015

Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency Response-Design Method

FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN

Asymptote. 2 Problems 2 Methods

Frequency Response Analysis

Step Response for the Transfer Function of a Sensor

Professor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley

Automatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

Direct Fatigue Damage Spectrum Calculation for a Shock Response Spectrum

Lecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types

Tracking of Spread Spectrum Signals

H(s) = 2(s+10)(s+100) (s+1)(s+1000)

Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications

2.010 Fall 2000 Solution of Homework Assignment 1

'XNH8QLYHUVLW\ (GPXQG73UDWW-U6FKRRORI(QJLQHHULQJ. EGR 224 Spring Test II. Michael R. Gustafson II

Desired Bode plot shape

Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises

BIOEN 302, Section 3: AC electronics

EE 4343/ Control System Design Project LECTURE 10

6.1 Sketch the z-domain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K., the closed-loop characteristic equation is K + z 0.

Lecture 1: Introduction to System Modeling and Control. Introduction Basic Definitions Different Model Types System Identification

Figure Circuit for Question 1. Figure Circuit for Question 2

ECE-320: Linear Control Systems Homework 8. 1) For one of the rectilinear systems in lab, I found the following state variable representations:

Chapter 3. 1 st Order Sine Function Input. General Solution. Ce t. Measurement System Behavior Part 2

Introducing Negative Feedback with an Integrator as the Central Element

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Module 5: Design of Sampled Data Control Systems Lecture Note 8

Signals, Instruments, and Systems W5. Introduction to Signal Processing Sampling, Reconstruction, and Filters

Refinements to Incremental Transistor Model

Digital Control Systems

Chapter 5 Frequency Domain Analysis of Systems

H(s) = s. a 2. H eq (z) = z z. G(s) a 2. G(s) A B. s 2 s(s + a) 2 s(s a) G(s) 1 a 1 a. } = (z s 1)( z. e ) ) (z. (z 1)(z e at )(z e at )

Modeling and System Identification for a DC Servo

III. The STM-8 Loop - Work in progress

Transcription:

Studio Exercise Time Response & Frequency Response 1 st -Order Dynamic System RC Low-Pass Filter i i in R out Assignment: Perform a Complete e in C e Dynamic System Investigation out of the RC Low-Pass Filter 1

Measurements, Calculations, Manufacturer's Specifications Model Parameter ID Which Parameters to Identify? What Tests to Perform? Physical System Physical Model Math Model Experimental Analysis Assumptions and Engineering Judgement Physical Laws Model Inadequate: Modify Equation Solution: Analytical and Numerical Solution Actual Dynamic Behavior Compare Predicted Dynamic Behavior Modify or Augment Make Design Decisions Model Adequate, Performance Inadequate Model Adequate, Performance Adequate Design Complete Dynamic System Investigation 2

Zero-Order Dynamic System Model 3

Validation of a Zero-Order Dynamic System Model 4

1 st -Order Dynamic System Model τ = time constant K = steady-state gain t = τ Slope at t = 0 q o Kq = τ is t e τ Kq is q o t = = 0 τ 5

How would you determine if an experimentallydetermined step response of a system could be represented by a first-order system step response? qo() t = Kqis 1 e o () q t Kq q Kq is () t is t o 1 = e τ Kq is = e () t τ t τ qo t t t log10 1 = log10 e = 0.4343 Kqis τ τ Straight-Line Plot: q ( t) o log10 1 vs. t Kqis Slope = -0.4343/τ 6

This approach gives a more accurate value of τ since the best line through all the data points is used rather than just two points, as in the 63.2% method. Furthermore, if the data points fall nearly on a straight line, we are assured that the instrument is behaving as a first-order type. If the data deviate considerably from a straight line, we know the system is not truly first order and a τ value obtained by the 63.2% method would be quite misleading. An even stronger verification (or refutation) of first-order dynamic characteristics is available from frequencyresponse testing. If the system is truly first-order, the amplitude ratio follows the typical low- and highfrequency asymptotes (slope 0 and 20 db/decade) and the phase angle approaches -90 asymptotically. 7

If these characteristics are present, the numerical value of τ is found by determining ω (rad/sec) at the breakpoint and using τ = 1/ω break. Deviations from the above amplitude and/or phase characteristics indicate non-first-order behavior. 8

What is the relationship between the unit-step response and the unit-ramp response and between the unit-impulse response and the unit-step response? For a linear time-invariant system, the response to the derivative of an input signal can be obtained by differentiating the response of the system to the original signal. For a linear time-invariant system, the response to the integral of an input signal can be obtained by integrating the response of the system to the original signal and by determining the integration constants from the zero-output initial condition. 9

Unit-Step Input is the derivative of the Unit-Ramp Input. Unit-Impulse Input is the derivative of the Unit- Step Input. Once you know the unit-step response, take the derivative to get the unit-impulse response and integrate to get the unit-ramp response. 10

System Frequency Response 11

Bode Plotting of 1 st -Order Frequency Response db = 20 log 10 (amplitude ratio) decade = 10 to 1 frequency change octave = 2 to 1 frequency change 12

Analog Electronics: RC Low-Pass Filter Time Response & Frequency Response i in e in R C i out e out e RCs + 1 R e in out i = in Cs 1 i out eout 1 1 = = when iout = 0 e RCs + 1 τ s + 1 in 13

Time Response to Unit Step Input 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 Amplitude 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 R = 15 KΩ C = 0.01 µf 0.2 0.1 0 0 1 2 3 4 Time (sec) 5 6 7 8 x 10-4 Time Constant τ = RC 14

Time Constant τ Time it takes the step response to reach 63% of the steady-state value Rise Time T r = 2.2 τ Time it takes the step response to go from 10% to 90% of the steady-state value Delay Time T d = 0.69 τ Time it takes the step response to reach 50% of the steady-state value 15

Frequency Response R = 15 KΩ C = 0.01 µf 0 0-5 -20 Gain db -10-15 Phase (degrees) -40-60 -20-80 -25 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 Frequency (rad/sec) Bandwidth = 1/τ -100 10 2 10 3 ( ) ( ) Frequency (ra e K K 0 K ωτ + ωτ + ωτ ωτ + out 1 ( iω ) = = = tan ωτ e 2 2 1 2 2 in i 1 1 tan 1 16

Bandwidth The bandwidth is the frequency where the amplitude ratio drops by a factor of 0.707 = -3dB of its gain at zero or low-frequency. For a 1 st -order system, the bandwidth is equal to 1/ τ. The larger (smaller) the bandwidth, the faster (slower) the step response. Bandwidth is a direct measure of system susceptibility to noise, as well as an indicator of the system speed of response. 17

MatLab / Simulink Diagram Frequency Response for 1061 Hz Sine Input τ = 1.5E-4 sec Sine Wave 1 tau.s+1 First-Order Plant output output input input Clock t time 18

Amplitude Ratio = 0.707 = -3 db Phase Angle = -45 Input 1 0.8 Response to Input 1061 Hz Sine Wave 0.6 0.4 0.2 amplitude 0-0.2-0.4 Output -0.6-0.8-1 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 time (sec) x 10-3 19