CAPACITY ESTIMATES AND GENERAL ARRANGEMENT

Similar documents
Longitudinal strength standard

RULES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS IDENTIFIED BY THEIR MISSIONS DREDGERS AND MUD BARGES CHAPTERS CHAPTERS SCOPE

Corrigenda 1 to 01 January 2017 version

DRAFT REGULATIONS TONNAGE MEASUREMENT OF SHIPS ORGANISATION FOR COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSIT LEAGUE OF NATIONS

HULL STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHIPS WITH LENGTH LESS THAN 100 METRES

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES. Requirements concerning STRENGTH OF SHIPS

Structural Rules for Container Ships

Hull Structural Design, Ships with Length Less than 100 metres

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 18/P ZONE STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF BULK CARRIER HULL STRUCTURE

HULL STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHIPS WITH LENGTH LESS THAN 100 METRES

HULL STRUCTURAL DESIGN, SHIPS WITH LENGTH 100 METRES AND ABOVE

INFLUENCE OF DECK PLATING STRENGTH ON SHIP HULL ULTIMATE BENDING MOMENT

RULES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF NAVAL SHIPS

Hull Structural Design, Ships with Length 100 metres and above

HULL STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHIPS WITH LENGTH 100 METRES AND ABOVE

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Inland navigation vessels. Part 3 Structures, equipment Chapter 2 Design load principles. Edition December 2015 DNV GL AS

HULL STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHIPS WITH LENGTH 100 METRES AND ABOVE

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION. Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 6 Hull local scantling. Edition January 2017 DNV GL AS

PLEASURE VESSEL VIBRATION AND NOISE FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

PAGE Ⅰ. INTENT 3 Ⅱ. PRINCIPAL PARTICULARS 4 Ⅳ. HOLD & TANK CAPACITY TABLE 6 Ⅴ. CURVES OF HEELING MOMENT, VOLUME AND KG 12

Hull structural design - Ships with length 100 metres and above

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 6 Hull local scantling. Edition October 2015 DNV GL AS

FATIGUE STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF STEEL HULL STRUCTURE

Ice Class Regulations and the Application Thereof

Ship structure dynamic analysis - effects of made assumptions on computation results

RULES FOR THE SURVEY AND CONSTRUCTION OF STEEL SHIPS

THE LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE FOR A SHIP HULL GIRDER

Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Graduate Study Specialization in Ocean Engineering. Written Preliminary Examination Information

IACS COMMON STRUCTURAL RULES FOR BULK CARRIERS

Vessel Name: MC(less than 24m)

SHIPS FOR NAVIGATION IN ICE

Seminar Container Securing on Container Vessels Part 1. May 11, 2012 Portoroz

Wuchang Shipbuilding Industry Co., Ltd. China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation

MEMBRANE TANK LNG VESSELS

Transport Analysis Report Full Stability Analysis. Project EXAMPLE PROJECT DEMO RUN FOR REVIEW. Client ORCA OFFSHORE

Chapter IV. (Ship Hydro-Statics & Dynamics) Floatation & Stability

Corrigenda 2 Rule Editorials

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 17/P ZONE STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF HULL STRUCTURE OF ROLL ON/ROLL OFF SHIP

Optimal Design of FPSO Vessels

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION. Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 10 Special requirements. Edition January 2017 DNV GL AS

Hit 24 5-inch Mount No. 5

Optimisation of the container ship hull structure

S19 S19. (1997) (Rev ) (Rev. 2 Feb. 1998) (Rev.3 Jun. 1998) (Rev.4 Sept. 2000) (Rev.5 July 2004) S Application and definitions

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION. Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 4 Loads. Edition January 2017 DNV GL AS

Hit 6 No. 1 Secondary Director

Corrigenda 3 Rule Editorials

On the Ship s Trimming using Moments of the Gravity and Buoyancy Forces of High Order

Machinery Requirements for Polar Class Ships

ASSESSMENT OF STRESS CONCENTRATIONS IN LARGE CONTAINER SHIPS USING BEAM HYDROELASTIC MODEL

Welcome to the Ship Resistance Predictor! The total calm water resistance is given by:

Technical Background for Rule Change Notice 1 to 01 JAN 2014 version

Ships for navigation in ice

ICE CLASS REGULATIONS 2008 (FINNISH-SWEDISH ICE CLASS RULES)

Final Exam Ship Structures Page 1 MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND. Engineering Ship Structures

Noise prediction of large ship 6700PCTC using EFEA-SEA hybrid technique

SLAMMING LOADS AND STRENGTH ASSESSMENT FOR VESSELS

Prediction of induced vibrations for a passenger - car ferry

RULES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS IDENTIFIED BY THEIR MISSION CHAPTERS A. SCOPE B. DOCUMENTS, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS

SHIP BUOYANCY AND STABILITY

THE ANNALS OF DUNĂREA DE JOS UNIVERSITY OF GALAŢI FASCICLE V, TECHNOLOGIES IN MACHINE BUILDING, ISSN , 2012

Hydrostatic and Stability IN A NUTSHELL. of Floating Structures. Compendium. Relevant to Questions in Exam. Robert Bronsart

Dynamics of Machinery

Upper and Lower Connections of Side Frame of Single Side Bulk Carrier

STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF OFFSHORE SHIPS

Safe Struck Ship (3S):Software Package for Structural analysis of collision between ships

RULES FOR THE SURVEY AND CONSTRUCTION OF STEEL SHIPS

DRILLSHIPS GUIDE FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING HULL STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS. AUGUST 2011 (Updated February 2014 see next page)

Notice No. 1 (Corrigenda)

An accurate model for seaworthy container vessel stowage planning with ballast tanks

Development of formulas allowing to predict hydrodynamic responses of inland vessels operated within the range of navigation 0.6 Hs 2.

SPECIAL CONDITION. Water Load Conditions. SPECIAL CONDITION Water Load Conditions

Evaluation of Scantlings of Corrugated Transverse Watertight Bulkheads in Non-CSR Bulk Carriers Considering Hold Flooding

SPRINGING ASSESSMENT FOR CONTAINER CARRIERS

Additional Rule for Longitudinal Strength Assessment of Container Ships JULY 2016

CARGO STOWAGE AND SECURING

Structural reliability assessment of accidentally damaged oil tanker

QUANTIFYING THE EFFECT OF INSPECTIONS IN SHIPS CONSIDERING THE SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF CORROSION

ESTIMATION OF HULL S RESISTANCE AT PRELIMINARY PHASE OF DESIGNING

Research on Prediction of Ship Manoeuvrability

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 122/P REQUIREMENTS FOR BALTIC ICE CLASS AND POLAR CLASS FOR SHIPS UNDER PRS SUPERVISION January

Digitalization in Shipping

SAFEHULL-DYNAMIC LOADING APPROACH FOR VESSELS

Hydrostatics and Stability Dr. Hari V Warrior Department of Ocean Engineering and Naval Architecture Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Design Theories of Ship and Offshore Plant

Additional Design Procedures

Motions and Resistance of a Ship in Regular Following Waves

Ship Resistance And Propulsion Prof. Dr. P. Krishnankutty Ocean Department Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

RESOLUTION MEPC.147(54) Adopted on 24 March 2006 GUIDELINES ON THE ASSESSMENT OF RESIDUAL FILLET WELD BETWEEN DECK PLATING AND LONGITUDINALS

VIBRATION ANALYSIS IN SHIP STRUCTURES BY FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

C C S 通函 Circular China Classification Society (2012 )Circ. 25 /Total No /2/2012 (total pages: 1+23 )

DESIGN OPTIMIZATION STUDY ON A CONTAINERSHIP PROPULSION SYSTEM

No INTER-GOVERNMENTAL MARITIME CONSULTATIVE ORGANIZATION

Rules for Classification and Construction Analysis Techniques

Chapter 33 - Polar Class Ships 2013

Aircraft Structures Design Example

OTC Copyright 2012, Offshore Technology Conference

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines Testing and Extrapolation Methods Propulsion, Performance Propulsion Test

Aircraft Performance, Stability and control with experiments in Flight. Questions

PRIVATE CAR STRUCTURES BASELINE LOAD PATHS

Transcription:

CAPACITY ESTIMATES AND GENERAL ARRANGEMENT This will verify that sufficient space is available for the amount of cargo to be carried. For capacity ships, it is a primary factor and may be a starting point in the design. It also determines the distribution of weight and hence the LCG and KG. Before detailed capacity estimate can be performed, a preliminary general arrangement (G.A) must be prepared. Preliminary Volume Coefficient This coefficient could be used to check volume, given main dimensions of a dead weight carrier, or as a starting point to estimate main dimensions on a capacity ship. PVC CARGO VOLUME L x Bx D x (CB 0.09) Assumes similar basis ship and also same stowage factor. The coefficient will vary with size and speed in a similar way to the DWT/ ratio. A slightly improved estimate can be made if the gross volume of the basis is known, measured between the peak bulkheads and from inner bottom to uppermost continuous deck. This can be adjusted for differences in fullness, sheer, camber, double bottom depth, engine room length. Fullness should be compared at 0.8D to relate it to depth rather than draught. This can be estimated from CB as will be described later, or a figure of (CB + 0.09) can be used. Double bottom depth, sheer and camber are allowed for by calculating a mean cargo depth, which is: Moulded depth to upper deck, D - depth of double bottom, d DB + half maximum deck camber, camber/ + mean sheer The mean sheer is given by: Sa = sheer aft ; Sa 6 Sf 4.5 x 5.0 Sf = sheer forward and the last factor allows for sheer only between stations and 9 Mean shear = 0.35 (Sa + Sf) Week 7-

Corrected depth, Dc = D ddb + Camber + 0.35(Sa + Sf) Length and breadth can be allowed for directly and a volume correction factor can be calculated as: Vol vactor = * * * L x B x Dc x( C L x B x D x( C c * B B 0.09) 0.09) This factor is applied to the basis ship gross volume to give an estimate of that for the proposed. From this, deduct all spaces, not available for cargo, i) Main machinery spaces ii) Shaft tunnel iii) Fuel tanks iv) Ballast only spaces v) Machinery casings vi) Store rooms etc. An approximation to the total volume of machinery spaces (engine room, tunnel, casings, fuel tanks) is given by:- Vm = CxSP 0.77 Where C is obtained from basis ship. From the total, about 70% will represent the machinery space proper (between machinery bulkheads and under nd deck) so that the distance between machinery bulkheads for midship machinery will be approximately: LER = 0.7xCxSP B D d 0.77 DB ( m) Example: Basis ship: Carries 790 m 3 of general cargo storage factor.56 L = 0.0m B = 7.50m T = 7.4m Du = 0.50m CB = 0.6800 Vm 0.7 = LER x Bx(D ddb) and Vm 0.7 = 0.7 x C x SP 0.77 Week 7-

New ship: L = 6.3m B = 7.0m Du = 0.00m (depth to upper deck) Cb = 0.693 Overall volume coeff. is given by :- Vc = C x L x B x D x [CB + 0.09] C = 790/(0 x 7.5 x 0.5 x 0.77) =.05545 *Vc =.05545 x 6.3 x 7.0 x 0.00 x (0.783) = 633 m 3 Additional information Basis New Length between peaks, LBP 06.5 03.5 Shaft Power (kw) 65 860 Engine room length, LER.35.90 Depth of Double Bottom, ddb.05.05 Sheer aft.6. Sheer ford.5.44 Camber at upper deck 0.58 0.56 Second estimate: Vc = K x L x B x Dc x (CB + 0.09) Where: L is length of cargo spaces Dc is mean cargo depth L = Length LBP between peaks - LER Dc = D ddb + 0.35(Sa + Sf) + (camber/) For basis, 790 = K x (06.5.35) x 7.5 x (0.5.05 + 0.35(.6 +.5) + 0.58 / ) x 0.77 K =.378 For New Design, *Vc =.378 x (03.5.9) x 7.0 x (0.35(. +.44) + 0.56)x0.783 = 664 m 3 Week 7-3

The Use of General Arrangement in Capacity Estimates The method of estimating cargo volume has already been given. Now an estimation of volume for each cargo compartment has to be found. To do so, an early GA has to be made available. The G.A. should show the following:- Main bulkheads Decks Machinery space Shear Extent of superstructure Etc. The G.A is important for the following purposes:- a) First graphical description for discussion b) Allows estimates of all volumes to ensure they are adequate c) Allows estimated of KG d) Allows estimates of LCG can find LCB for powering The estimates should include a number of conditions:- a) Full load departure b) Full load arrival c) Ballast departure d) Ballast arrival e) Special conditions [eg. At half load] For each condition trim, stability and strength has to be estimated. Considerations in determining the G.A: a) Position of machinery usually either aft or amidships. Aft machinery allows efficient cargo stowage for cargo ships, containers etc. b) Height of double bottom Determines by classification society regulations and requirement of greater storage of water ballast and fuel. c) Cargo accesses Depends on type of ship This is in terms of positioning hatches, cargo handling gears and hold capacity or shape. d) Bulkhead location define by classification society. Consideration for damage stability which depends on ship length. e) No. of decks determine by variety of cargoes or types and freeboard regulations. Week 7-4

f) Wing tanks for ballast and stability. g) Framing system transverse or longitudinal system of framing Affect cargo stowage. h) Accommodation depending on number of officers and crew members required. Estimating Cargo Hold Capacities and Centres If a basis ship G.A. is available, an estimate of cargo hold capacities and centres can be found provided the G.A. is similar to basis ship G.A. The following procedure can be adopted: a) Identify the positions of bulkheads, cargo holds with respect to length of the ship. b) Relate the positions on curve of cross section area of cargo sections and kg of cargo sections. For G.A. of new ship:- a) Transform values read from curve to appropriate positions on new ship. The positions of bulkheads and cargo holds between basis and new ship is found by graphical manner [Linear]. AP,AP* Posn. Of bulkhead x Basis Ship FP X * New Ship FP* Relationship : L * x* x. length from AP L Week 7-5

b) Do numerical integrations Ord. Area sm f(v) kg f(mt) lever f(ma) a b c d.48 04.5 85.47 5.09 3 3.48 73.5 5.8 5.49 5.9 6.49 577.466 449.70 0 3 0 979.6 Cargo space length = 5.40m Volume* = 5.40 3.85x7.86 x x73.58x 3 8 3.70x8.35 = 4.5m 3 kg* = 445.70 7.86 0.94 x 0.84 5.8m 73.5 8.35 LCG* = 979.6 5.40 x 6.87m 73.5 3 Week 7-6

Basis (m) New (m) Length 94.5 85.3 Breadth 3.70.85 D c 8.35 7.86 d DB 0.94 0.84 Week 7-7