The Large Hadron Collider Lyndon Evans CERN

Similar documents
2008 JINST 3 S Main machine layout and performance. Chapter Performance goals

The LHC: the energy, cooling, and operation. Susmita Jyotishmati

Much of this material comes from lectures given by Philippe Lebrun (head of CERN's Accelerator Technology Department), at SUSSP, Aug

Overview of LHC Accelerator

Large Hadron Collider at CERN

The LHC. Part 1. Corsi di Dottorato Corso di Fisica delle Alte Energie Maggio 2014 Per Grafstrom CERN and University of Bologna

Engines of Discovery

Accelerators. Lecture V. Oliver Brüning. school/lecture5

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

LHC Status and CERN s future plans. Lyn Evans

SPPC Study and R&D Planning. Jingyu Tang for the SPPC study group IAS Program for High Energy Physics January 18-21, 2016, HKUST

The LHC Collider. STOA lecture, Brussels, 27 th November 2012 Steve Myers Director of Accelerators and Technology, CERN

LHC Luminosity and Energy Upgrade

Signaling the Arrival of the LHC Era December Current Status of the LHC. Albert De Roeck CERN Switzerland

SMR/ Summer School on Particle Physics June LHC Accelerators and Experiments (part I) Marzio Nessi CERN, Switzerland

EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH European Laboratory for Particle Physics STATUS OF THE LHC. R. Schmidt

PUBLICATION. Consolidated EIR design baseline: Milestone M3.6

(a) (b) Fig. 1 - The LEP/LHC tunnel map and (b) the CERN accelerator system.

DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION OF SUPERCONDUCTING AND CRYOGENIC EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS FOR ACCELERATORS BY IHEP

Introduction to particle accelerators

R&D ON FUTURE CIRCULAR COLLIDERS

Modern Accelerators for High Energy Physics

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. - Accelerator Techniques: Introduction and History -

1.1 Electron-Cloud Effects in the LHC

Physics at Accelerators

Accelerator Design and Construction Progress of TPS Project

Why are particle accelerators so inefficient?

SUPERCONDUCTIVITY APPLIED TO PARTICLE ACCELERATOR MAGNETS

Thanks to all Contributors

LHC operation in 2015 and prospects for the future

Operational Experience with HERA

The Large Hadron Collider Performance, technology & future upgrades

Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design **

EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CERN - ACCELERATORS AND TECHNOLOGY SECTOR

ACCELERATOR PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY OF THE LHC

Particles and Universe: Particle accelerators

Introduction to Accelerators. Scientific Tools for High Energy Physics and Synchrotron Radiation Research

Transverse Beam Dynamics II

LHC Commissioning in 2008

WHAT CAN THE SSC AND THE VLHC STUDIES TELL US FOR THE HE-LHC?

Practical Lattice Design

Putting it all together

SLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland

Beam losses versus BLM locations at the LHC

Superconducting Magnets for Future Electron-Ion Collider. Yuhong Zhang Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, USA

LHC upgrade based on a high intensity high energy injector chain

Ultra-Low Emittance Storage Ring. David L. Rubin December 22, 2011

Physics 610. Adv Particle Physics. April 7, 2014

LHC. Construction Understanding first the commissioning. Prospects for

Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam

LHC commissioning. 22nd June Mike Lamont LHC commissioning - CMS 1

Optimization of the SIS100 Lattice and a Dedicated Collimation System for Ionisation Losses

The Electron-Ion Collider

LHC accelerator status and prospects. Frédérick Bordry Higgs Hunting nd September Paris

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

Beam. RF antenna. RF cable

RING-RING DESIGN. Miriam Fitterer, CERN - KIT for the LHeC study group

Longitudinal Dynamics

A SIMULATION STUDY OF THE ELECTRON CLOUD IN THE EXPERIMENTAL REGIONS OF LHC

The Luminosity Upgrade at RHIC. G. Robert-Demolaize, Brookhaven National Laboratory

Introduction to Accelerator Physics

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

Luminosity for the 100 TeV collider

MAGNET SYSTEMS FOR LARGE PARTICLE ACCELERATORS

1.1 Machine-Detector Interface

FY04 Luminosity Plan. SAG Meeting September 22, 2003 Dave McGinnis

Introduction to Collider Physics

Gianluigi Arduini CERN - Beams Dept. - Accelerator & Beam Physics Group

Supercritical Helium Cooling of the LHC Beam Screens

ThomX Machine Advisory Committee. (LAL Orsay, March ) Ring Beam Dynamics

Introduction to accelerators for teachers (Korean program) Mariusz Sapiński CERN, Beams Department August 9 th, 2012

Conceptual design of an accumulator ring for the Diamond II upgrade

Status and Outlook of the LHC

Electron Cloud Studies made at CERN in the SPS

International Scientific Spring 2010, March 1-6, 1. R. Garoby. slhc

Alignment in Circular Colliders and Specific Requirements for LHC

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

Accelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman

The CERN Accelerator School holds courses in all of the member states of CERN. 2013, Erice, Italy

COMBINER RING LATTICE

OVERVIEW OF THE LHEC DESIGN STUDY AT CERN

Introduction to Transverse Beam Dynamics

An Introduction to Particle Accelerators. v short

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design (Modified FODO)

HE-LHC Optics Development

Higgs Factory Magnet Protection and Machine-Detector Interface

Introduction to Accelerators

Cable-in-Conduit Dipoles to enable a Future Hadron Collider

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

Particle Physics Columbia Science Honors Program

RHIC - the high luminosity hadron collider

6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac

Abstract. 1. Introduction

The 2015 erhic Ring-Ring Design. Christoph Montag Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory

Status of the LHC Machine

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

BEAM TESTS OF THE LHC TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK SYSTEM

Transcription:

The Large Hadron Collider Lyndon Evans CERN 1.9 K 2.728 K T The coldest ring in the universe! L.R. Evans 1

The Large Hadron Collider This lecture. LHC Technologies Magnets Cryogenics Radiofrequency Vacuum Tomorrow. LHC Accelerator Physics Intrabeam scattering Beam-beam interaction Coherent effects Electron cloud L.R. Evans 2

Introduction The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN is now in its final installation and commissioning phase. It is a two-ring superconducting proton-proton collider housed in the 27 km tunnel previously constructed for the Large Electron Positron collider (LEP). It is designed to provide protonproton collisions with unprecedented luminosity (1034cm-2.s-1) and a centre-of-mass energy of 14 TeV for the study of rare events such as the production of the Higgs particle if it exists. In order to reach the required energy in the existing tunnel, the dipoles must operate at 1.9 K in superfluid helium. In addition to p-p operation, the LHC will be able to collide heavy nuclei (Pb-Pb) with a centre-of-mass energy of 1150 TeV (2.76 TeV/u and 7 TeV per charge). By modifying the existing obsolete antiproton ring (LEAR) into an ion accumulator (LEIR) in which electron cooling is applied, the luminosity can reach 1027cm-2.s-1. L.R. Evans 3

Main parameters of LHC (p-p) Circumference 26.7 km Beam energy at collision 7 TeV Beam energy at injection 0.45 TeV Dipole field at 7 TeV 8.33 T Luminosity 10 34 cm -2.s -1 Beam current 0.56 A Protons per bunch 1.1x10 11 Number of bunches 2808 Nominal bunch spacing 24.95 ns Normalized emittance 3.75 μm Total crossing angle 300 μrad Energy loss per turn 6.7 kev Critical synchrotron energy 44.1 ev Radiated power per beam 3.8 kw Stored energy per beam 350 MJ Stored energy in magnets 11 GJ Operating temperature 1.9 K L.R. Evans 4

Beam momentum & stored energy of colliders Energy stored in the accelerator beam, as a function of beam momentum. At less than 1% of nominal intensity LHC enters new territory. Stored energy density as a function of beam momentum. Transverse energy density is a measure of damage potential and is proportional to luminosity. L.R. Evans 5

Schematic layout of the LHC L.R. Evans 6

Lattice Layout The regular LHC lattice was designed to maximize the amount of bending power in the arc by making the dipoles as long as reasonably possible. This minimizes the amount of dead space between interconnects as well as the number of dipoles to be manufactured, tested and interconnected. After careful optimization, the dipole length was chosen to be 14.2 m (magnetic), 15 m overall with 23 regular lattice periods per arc. Each period is 106.9 m long and is made up of six dipoles and two short straight sections each of 6.6 m length containing the main quadrupoles and lattice correctors. The two apertures of ring 1 and ring 2 are separated by 194 mm. Both dipole apertures are connected in series whereas the quadrupoles are powered in two families, all focusing quadrupoles of rings one and two in series and likewise for the defocusing quadrupoles. The transition from the regular arc contains a dispersion suppressor consisting of two perturbed lattice periods. The purpose of the dispersion suppressor is threefold: - adapt the LHC reference orbit to the geometry of the tunnel, - cancel the horizontal dispersion generated in the arc and by the separation and recombination dipoles, - help with the matching of the beams between the arcs and straight sections. L.R. Evans 7

Lattice Layout A generic design of a dispersion suppressor can be made using standard arc cells with missing dipoles and dipoles of different length to those in the arc. However, due to the constraints imposed by the geometry of the existing tunnel and the economy of having only one standard dipole length, the dispersion can only be fully cancelled by individual powering of the quadrupoles in the dispersion suppressor cells. These quadrupoles also provide additional parameters for matching the insertion optics. The short straight sections in the arcs contain the main quadrupoles and also the correction sextupoles for chromaticity control and the orbit correction dipoles. Depending on their location, they can also contain trim normal or skew quadrupoles or Landau damping octupoles. The optics of the long straight sections differ according to their functionality. At Points 1 and 5 in the high luminosity insertions the small beta (0.5 m) at the collision point is generated with the help of a quadrupole triplet assembly. At points 2 and 8, the optics at the 450 GeV injection level must allow beam injection whereas at top field the beams must be focused to a moderate beta. At the utility insertions the optics is tailored to their functionality. Details of the optics in the various insertions can be found elsewhere*. *LHC Design Report, CERN-2004-03. (2004) L.R. Evans 8

L.R. Evans 9

Magnets The LHC contains more than 7000 superconducting magnets ranging from the 15 m long main dipoles to the 10 cm long octupole/decapole correctors inside the dipole cold masses as well as more than 100 conventional warm magnets not counting the 500 or so conventional magnets in the two 2.6 km long transfer lines between the SPS and the LHC. The most challenging are the superconducting dipoles and the quadrupoles in the arcs, dispersion suppressor and matching regions. The three large superconducting accelerators operating today, the Tevatron (FNAL), HERA (DESY) and RHIC (BNL) all use magnets made with classical Nb-Ti superconductor cooled with supercritical helium at a temperature slightly above 4.2 K. In each case, the nominal field is below or around 5 T. In order to increase the field to above 8 T, two possibilities exist today. L.R. Evans 10

Critical Current Density of Technical Superconductors Jc [A/mm2] 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 NbTi @ 4.5 K NbTi @ 1.8 K Nb3Sn @ 4.5 K LHC Spec Cable 1 LHC Spec Cable 2 500 0 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 B [T] L.R. Evans 11

Superconducting magnets in the LHC Type Number Function MB 1232 Main dipoles MQ 392 Arc quadrupoles MBX/MBR 16 Separation & recombination dipoles MSCB 376 Combined chromaticity & closed orbit correctors MCS 2464 Sextupole correctors for persistent currents at injection MCDO 1232 Octupole/decapole correctors for persistent currents at injection MO 336 Landau damping octupoles MQT/MQTL 248 Tuning quadrupoles MCB 190 Orbit correction dipoles MQM 86 Dispersion suppressor & matching section quadrupoles MQY 24 Enlarged-aperture quadrupoles in insertions MQX 32 Low-beta insertion quadrupoles L.R. Evans 12

L.R. Evans 13

L.R. Evans 14

Dipole magnetic flux plot L.R. Evans 15

Cross-section of LHC Cryodipole L.R. Evans 16

Dipole: b3 integral field 10 Firm 1 Firm 2 Firm 3 Cold mass b3 integral (units) 5 0-5 Cross-section 2 upper limit for systematic lower limit for systematic -10 Cross-section 3 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Magnet progressive number AT-MAS & MTM L.R. Evans 17

Dipole: integral field Cold mass 10.15 Firm 1 Firm 2 40 Int transf func (Tm/kA) 10.13 10.11 10.09 Firm 3 upper limit for single magnet (3 sigma) 20 0-20 Units 10.07 lower limit for single magnet (3 sigma) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Magnet progressive number AT-MAS -40 L.R. Evans 18

Cryogenics The LHC magnets are cooled with pressurized superfluid helium, which has some interesting properties that make it a unique engineering material. Best known is its very low bulk viscosity which allows it to permeate the smallest cracks. This is used to advantage in the magnet design by making the coil insulation porous and enabling the fluid to be in contact with the strands of the superconductor. It also has a very large specific heat, 100,000 times that of the superconductor per unit mass and 2000 times per unit volume. L.R. Evans 19

Equivalent Thermal Conductivity of He II Y(T) ± 5% 2000 1500 1000 2.4 ( &) = & ( ) KT,q q YT dt dx = 3.4 q& Y(T) q & in W / cm T in K X in cm 2 Helium II 500 OFHC copper Tλ 0 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2 2.1 2.2 T [K] L.R. Evans 20

Phase Diagram of Helium 10000 SOLID 1000 P [kpa] 100 HeII Pressurized He II λ line HeI CRITICAL POINT GAS 10 Saturated He II 1 1 10 T [K] L.R. Evans 21

L.R. Evans 22

Cryogenic Architecture at LHC Even Point 1.8 K Refrigeration Unit New 4.5 K Refrigerator Ex-LEP 4.5 K refrigerator 1.8 K Refrigeration Unit Warm Compressor Station Warm Compressor Station Warm Compressor Station Warm Compressor Station Surface Cold Box Upper Cold Box Shaft Cold Compressor box Interconnection Box Lower Cold Box Cold Compressor box Cavern Distribution Line Magnet Cryostats Distribution Line Magnet Cryostats Tunnel LHC Sector (3.3 km) LHC Sector (3.3 km) L.R. Evans 23

Infrastructure and refrigerators at 4.5 K Point 8 Storage QSCC QSCA QSCB QSRA QSRB QSCC Shaft Surface QURA QURC QUIC QURC Cavern Sector 7-8 Sector 8-1 Tunnel L.R. Evans 24

Refrigeration units at 1.8 K Point 8 Storage Air Liquide QSCC QSCA QSCB QSRA QSRB QSCC Surface IHI Linde Shaft QURA QURC QUIC QURC Cavern Sector 7-8 Sector 8-1 Tunnel L.R. Evans 25

Cold compressors for 1.8 K refrigeration units IHI-LINDE Impeller 1 st stage The four stages L.R. Evans 26

Radiofrequency Acceleration System The RF system is located at Point 4. Two independent sets of cavities operating at 400 MHz (twice the frequency of the SPS injector) allow independent control of the two beams. The superconducting cavities are made from copper on which a thin film of a few microns of Niobium is sputtered onto the internal surface. In order to allow for the lateral space, the beam separation must be increased from 194 mm in the arcs to 420 mm. In order to combat intrabeam scattering each RF system must provide 16 MV during coast whilst at injection 8 MV is needed. For each beam there are 8 single cell cavities, each providing 2 MV, with a conservative gradient of 5.5 MV/m. The cavities are grouped into two modules per beam, each containing four cells. Each cavity is driven by an independent RF system, with independent klystron, circulator and load. Although the RF hardware required is much smaller than LEP due to the very small synchrotron radiation power loss, the real challenges are in controlling beam loading and RF noise. L.R. Evans 27

Four-Cavity Module during assembly L.R. Evans 28

400 MHz Klystron L.R. Evans 29

Vacuum System The LHC presents several original requirements compared with classical vacuum systems. It has to ensure adequate beam lifetime in a cryogenic system where heat input to the 1.9 K helium circuit must be minimized and where significant quantities of gas can be condensed on the vacuum chamber. The main heat sources are: - Synchrotron light radiated by the beam at high energy (0.2 W.M-1 per beam, with a critical energy of about 44 ev; - Image currents (0.2 W.M-1 per beam); - Energy dissipated by the development of electron clouds. - Energy loss by nuclear scattering (30 mw.m-1 per beam). In order to remove the heat from all these processes but the last with high thermodynamic efficiency, the 1.9 K cold bore of the magnets is shielded with a beam screen cooled to between 5 and 20 K. This beam screen is perforated with about 4% of the surface area to allow the cold bore of the magnets at 1.9 K to act as a distributed cryopump, allowing gas to be condensed on the cold bore surface protected against desorption by bombardment with synchrotron radiation photons. L.R. Evans 30

LHC Beam Screen L.R. Evans 31

Warm Vacuum System For roughly 3 km of the 27 km circumference, mainly in the long straight sections, the vacuum chambers are at room temperature, requiring a low residual pressure without the benefit of the distributed cryopumping. As a spin-off of the development of sputtering technology for superconducting cavities a new getter material (TiZrV) has been developed which can be sputtered on the internal surface of the copper vacuum chambers and can be activated at the very low temperature of 200 degrees (conventional getters require activation at 600 degrees). When activated, the chamber wall itself becomes a distributed pump, producing very low residual pressure and at the same time a very low secondary emission yield, preventing the buildup of an electron cloud. All warm chambers, including those inside the detectors, are treated in this way. L.R. Evans 32

Installation and Commissioning Last week, machine installation passed the half-way mark. Magnet installation will finish in March 2007 and the ring will be closed by August. There will be a low energy run in November 2007 where stable beams will be given to the detectors at 900 GeV (cm) whilst ramping studies will take place during machine studies. The first long physics run at 14 TeV will be in 2008. L.R. Evans 33