(a) (b) Fig. 1 - The LEP/LHC tunnel map and (b) the CERN accelerator system.

Similar documents
LHC Detectors and their Physics Potential. Nick Ellis PH Department, CERN, Geneva

CMS Note Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

2 ATLAS operations and data taking

Risultati dell esperimento ATLAS dopo il run 1 di LHC. C. Gemme (INFN Genova), F. Parodi (INFN/University Genova) Genova, 28 Maggio 2013

Discovery of the W and Z 0 Bosons

Large Hadron Collider at CERN

Particle Physics Columbia Science Honors Program

The ATLAS Detector at the LHC

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

Optimizing Selection and Sensitivity Results for VV->lvqq, 6.5 pb -1, 13 TeV Data

Identifying Particle Trajectories in CMS using the Long Barrel Geometry

The Big-Bang Machine. Stefan Spanier Physics and Astronomy University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 25 February 2017 Stefan Spanier, The Big Bang Machine

Non-collision Background Monitoring Using the Semi-Conductor Tracker of ATLAS at LHC

Modern Accelerators for High Energy Physics

Particle detection 1

LHC & ATLAS. The largest particle physics experiment in the world. Vincent Hedberg - Lund University 1

Physics at Accelerators

4. LHC experiments Marcello Barisonzi LHC experiments August

Future prospects for the measurement of direct photons at the LHC

Upgrade of ATLAS and CMS for High Luminosity LHC: Detector performance and Physics potential

The ATLAS C. Gemme, F.Parodi

AIM AIM. Study of Rare Interactions. Discovery of New High Mass Particles. Energy 500GeV High precision Lots of events (high luminosity) Requirements

Dean Karlen University of Victoria & TRIUMF. APS NW Section Meeting 2005 Victoria, Canada

Physics at Hadron Colliders

LHC State of the Art and News

The Particle World. This talk: What is our Universe made of? Where does it come from? Why does it behave the way it does?

PERFORMANCE OF THE ATLAS MUON TRIGGER IN RUN 2

7 Physics at Hadron Colliders

Introduction of CMS Detector. Ijaz Ahmed National Centre for Physics, Islamabad

PoS(EPS-HEP 2013)508. CMS Detector: Performance Results. Speaker. I. Redondo * CIEMAT

Year- 1 (Heavy- Ion) Physics with CMS at the LHC

Particles and Universe: Particle accelerators

Last Friday: pp(bar) Physics Intro, the TeVatron

CEPC Detector and Physics Studies

Short Introduction to CLIC and CTF3, Technologies for Future Linear Colliders

Theory English (Official)

PoS(DIS 2010)058. ATLAS Forward Detectors. Andrew Brandt University of Texas, Arlington

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. - Accelerator Techniques: Introduction and History -

Beam-induced radiation in the compact muon solenoid tracker at the Large Hadron Collider

2008 JINST 3 S Outlook. Chapter 11

Recent CMS results on heavy quarks and hadrons. Alice Bean Univ. of Kansas for the CMS Collaboration

Muon reconstruction performance in ATLAS at Run-2

e + e - (1) Silicon Vertex Detector

Introduction to CERN and CMS

Frontier Particle Accelerators

Higgs Production at LHC

The ATLAS Detector - Inside Out Julia I. Hofmann

Dario Barberis. Physics with 2 nd Generation Pixel Detectors. Pixel 2002, Carmel (Ca), Sept Dario Barberis Genova University/INFN 1

Status and Performance of the ATLAS Experiment

Signaling the Arrival of the LHC Era December Current Status of the LHC. Albert De Roeck CERN Switzerland

Background Analysis Columbia University REU 2015

The ATLAS muon and tau triggers

A brief history of accelerators, detectors and experiments: (See Chapter 14 and Appendix H in Rolnick.)

Analyzing CMS events

Recent results from the LHCb experiment

A glance at LHC Detector Systems. Burkhard Schmidt, CERN PH-DT

Walter Hopkins. February

Measurement of the Higgs Couplings by Means of an Exclusive Analysis of its Diphoton decay

The LHC The Large Hadron Collider and ATLAS

The Discovery of the Higgs Boson: one step closer to understanding the beginning of the Universe

Physics potential of ATLAS upgrades at HL-LHC

The God particle at last? Astronomy Ireland, Oct 8 th, 2012

First physics with the ATLAS and CMS experiments. Niels van Eldik on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations

Studies of top pair production in the fully hadronic channel at LHC with CMS

The Collider Detector at Fermilab. Amitabh Lath Rutgers University July 25, 2002

HL-LHC Physics with CMS Paolo Giacomelli (INFN Bologna) Plenary ECFA meeting Friday, November 23rd, 2012

Detecting. Particles

The LHC. Part 1. Corsi di Dottorato Corso di Fisica delle Alte Energie Maggio 2014 Per Grafstrom CERN and University of Bologna

Particle Detectors : an introduction. Erik Adli/Are Strandlie, University of Oslo, August 2017, v2.3

Investigation of the discovery potential of a Higgs boson in the t th 0, H 0 b b channel with the ATLAS experiment

Higgs cross-sections

La ricerca dell Higgs Standard Model a CDF

Mojtaba Mohammadi Najafabadi School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM Aban 22- IPM Workshop on Electroweak and Higgs at the LHC

Elementary Particle Physics Glossary. Course organiser: Dr Marcella Bona February 9, 2016

Heavy Ions at the LHC: Selected Predictions. Georg Wolschin. Institut für Theoretische Physik der Universität, Heidelberg, Germany

UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO - BICOCCA DIPARTIMENTO DI FISICA G. OCCHIALINI CORSO DI DOTTORATO IN FISICA E ASTRONOMIA CICLO XXVII

2 The ATLAS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN

Accelerators. Lecture V. Oliver Brüning. school/lecture5

QCD cross section measurements with the OPAL and ATLAS detectors

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 6 Jul 2007

Physics at the LHC (1)

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Design of the new ATLAS Inner Tracker for the High Luminosity LHC era

Search for a Z at an e + e - Collider Thomas Walker

8.882 LHC Physics. Review

Boosted searches for WW/WZ resonances in

Results from the Tevatron: Standard Model Measurements and Searches for the Higgs. Ashutosh Kotwal Duke University

Introduction to Accelerator Physics Part 1

ATLAS EXPERIMENT : HOW THE DATA FLOWS. (Trigger, Computing, and Data Analysis)

Study and Simulation of the Radiation background of the ATLAS Experiment at CERN using the Monte Carlo method

Electromagnetic Calorimeter Calibration: Getting Rid of the Trash

Introduction to Accelerator Physics Part 1

17/01/17 F. Ould-Saada

Z 0 /γ +Jet via electron decay mode at s = 7TeV in

Reconstruction and identification of hadronic τ decays with ATLAS

Part II: Detectors. Peter Schleper Universität Hamburg

The Discovery of the Higgs boson Matthew Herndon, University of Wisconsin Madison Physics 301: Physics Today. M. Herndon, Phys

Measurement of the associated production of direct photons and jets with the Atlas experiment at LHC. Michele Cascella

Search for Displaced Supersymmetry using the Compact Muon Solenoid Detector

Expected Performance of the ATLAS Inner Tracker at the High-Luminosity LHC

Transcription:

Introduction One of the main events in the field of particle physics at the beginning of the next century will be the construction of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). This machine will be installed into the existing Large Electron Positron (LEP) tunnel at the CERN laboratory across the Franco-Swiss border west of Geneva, as shown in Fig. 1. The pre-existence of the LEP tunnel and of the CERN accelerator chain for particle injection will make the cost of the machine affordable. The LHC will be the largest hadron Collider in the world and will extend the energy frontier of physics, offering a further insight in the basic mechanisms of nature, as for example the mechanism that gives masses to the fundamental constituents of matter. LHC is a very challenging project because of the engineering constraints and of the Physics requirements. As a consequence of the fixed length of the ring, imposed by the choice of using the existing LEP tunnel, the limit to the acceleration of the colliding particles comes from the strength of the maximum bending magnetic field. A new generation of superconducting magnets will provide the magnetic field necessary to achieve the TeV energy range. A large cryostat will keep the magnets at the working temperature of 1.9 K. The statistical significance of the scientific results will be obtained by means of the exceptional luminosity of LHC, which will insure a good number of interesting events per year. On the other hand, it will lead to a very high radiation environment for the particle detectors. Therefore, the survival of the detectors in this harsh radiation environment during 10 years of operation planned for the machine is a challenging issue for the detectors. Part of this thesis is devoted to the radiation hardness studies of silicon detectors, mainly in view of their application to LHC experiment trackers. Nevertheless, the results can be important for other fields of science where the radiation level is important, as in nuclear reactors, radiotherapy and space applications. The first chapter describes briefly the LHC accelerator and experiments, giving some predictions, based on simulations, of the radiation levels expected in the LHC detector cavities and it gives the motivation of this thesis. Chapter 2 introduces some results of the semiconductor physics and describes briefly several processes of silicon production and detectors manufacturing that are relevant for the present 19

work. Chapter 3 describes the radiation damage mechanisms and their consequences on the operation of silicon detectors. Chapter 4 introduces the experimental techniques, with detailed discussion of the problem inherent with the interpretation of the measurement, error sources and tolerances. Chapter 5 describes the various silicon materials irradiated and measured. Chapter 6 shows and comments the experimental results. Chapter 7 studies the evolution of the electric field in irradiated detectors and gives a model to interpret several unexplained aspects emerged in electrical measurements of irradiated detectors. (a) Fig. 1 - The LEP/LHC tunnel map and (b) the CERN accelerator system. (b) 20

Chapter 1. Motivation and framework 1.1 The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) The LHC [1.1] is a two-ring machine with a total length of 27 km which will allow the head-on collision of proton beams, each with an energy of 7 TeV, and beam collisions of heavy ions, such as lead, with a total collision energy in centre-of-mass of 1,250 TeV. Joint LHC/LEP operation could supply electron-proton collisions with a centre-of-mass energy of 1.5 TeV. Figure 1.1 shows a cross-section of the tunnel with a possible installation of LHC and LEP rings. Fig. 1.1 Cross section of the LHC/LEP tunnel. LEP magnet is hosted above the double-coil LHC magnet. In the LHC, the energy available in the collisions between the constituents of the protons (the quarks and gluons) will reach the TeV range, about 10 times that of LEP. The particle cross section decreases like 1/E 2, therefore a very high luminosity is required for proton-proton (pp) collision in order to maintain a physics program as effective as in LEP. At LEP the luminosity is around L = 10 32 cm -2 s -1, whereas it will reach L = 10 34 cm -2 s -1 at LHC. This value will be 21

obtained by filling each ring with 2835 bunches of 10 11 particles, injected in the LHC by the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) at the energy of 0.45 TeV. The bunch space will be 7.48 m, corresponding to an interval between two successive bunches of 25 ns at the collision energy. An 8.33 T magnetic field provided by 1296 superconducting dipole magnets over a total magnetic length of 15 km will guide the protons in the LHC orbits. Superconducting quadrupole correctors will make the orbit corrections to the spurious non-linear components of the guiding and focusing magnetic fields of the machine and allow the recovering of the required beam density after interactions. Special orbit correctors will be used, as sextupole, octupole and decapole magnets. The luminosity lifetime will be about 10 hours. The two beam pipes of LHC and the superconducting coils will be hosted in the same superfluid helium cryostat at the temperature of 1.9 K. 1.2 Physics at LHC The LHC machine and the planned experiments have been designed to study the extrapolation of the present knowledge in particle physics to the LHC energy scale and to detect the signatures of a new and possibly unexpected physics above the TeV energy threshold. The Standard Model (SM) describes very well the results of present experiments. However some fundamental questions remain still unanswered. The most important of them is probably the origin of the mass of the Z and W vector bosons of the electroweak interactions. The most accredited explanation is the existence of a Higgs field. One of the main goals of LHC is the discovery of the associated gauge boson, the Higgs particle. The SM does not predict the Higgs mass. The limits of the Higgs mass are set in the range 67.5 GeV < m H < 1 TeV, where the lower limit comes from the present electroweak data and the upper is theoretical. The experiments are designed to cover the different physics signatures of the Higgs, consisting in the identification of the predicted decay modes, with statistical significance over all the mass range. This requires very high luminosity because the cross section for heavy particle scales inversely with the square root of their masses. Figure 1.2 shows the energy dependence of the cross section for various processes in pp interactions [1.2]. The rate of events is obtained by the product of the cross section and the luminosity. The rate of 22

the Higgs boson production at the expected LHC luminosity and energy is 4-5 10-3 s -1, assuming the Higgs mass equal to 500 GeV. Other important topics are top-quark physics, CP-violation in the B-sector, possible signals of the formation of the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) and search for supersymmetric particles. The experiments presently approved at LHC are ALICE (A Large Ion Collider Experiment), ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) and CMS (Compact Muon Solenoid). ALICE is an experiment mainly devoted to the QGP study by mean of heavy ion (Pb) collision at a centreof-mass energy of 5.5 TeV per nucleon pair and a luminosity of about 2 10 27 cm -2 s -1. This will create energy densities of 5-8 GeV fm -3, above the QGP threshold [1.3]. CMS and ATLAS will run pp collision at the maximum centre of mass energy of 14 TeV and up to the maximum luminosity. Fig. 1.2 - Cross section for various processes expected in proton-proton interactions as a function of the centre-of-mass energy s 23

1.2.1 The ATLAS and CMS detectors Figures 1.3(a) and (b) show the cross section of the two detectors [1.4,1.5]. Without entering into design details and the differences between the two approaches to the LHC physics, the basic common requirements are Good muon system Good electromagnetic (EM) calorimeter High quality inner tracker. The muon system is crucial for the high luminosity physics and must provide good momentum resolution, safe stand-alone operation at higher luminosity, when the inner tracker might be of limited use because of the radiation damage, excellent geometrical acceptance and robust pattern recognition. The requirement to the EM calorimeter, for the identification and measurement of photons and electron energies are: hermetic jet and missing transverse energy measurement high luminosity operation radiation tolerance for 10 years operation. The inner tracker functions are essentially the reconstruction of high p T tracks with 90-95% efficiency, high momentum resolution for leptons, electron and photon identification at high luminosity and τ and b tagging at low luminosity. A key feature of the inner tracker is the ability to distinguish secondary from primary vertex. Short lifetime particles, as for instance the charmed particle, live for about 0.3 ps before decaying. In this case, the secondary vertex is situated some millimetres far from the interaction point. The tracks of the longer lifetime particles generated in the decay are reconstructed and allow the identification of the event. The unambiguous reconstruction of the secondary vertex requires a good spatial resolution. The use of pixel and microstrip silicon detectors satisfies the spatial resolution requirements because of their fine segmentation. Designs of the ATLAS and CMS inner tracker are shown in Fig. 1.4. 24

Fig. 1.3 (a) The CMS detector Fig. 1.3(b) The ATLAS detector 1.2.2 The radiation environment 25

The high interaction rate for pp collision at high luminosity at LHC ( 10 9 s -1 ) will lead to a very high radiation level in the detectors, depending on its position relatively to the interaction point. Naive calculations of the particle flux in the detector lead to a flux independent of z (the coordinate along the beam direction) and decreasing as 1/r 2, where r is the radial distance from the beam axis. Although this estimate is very inaccurate, it indicates that the harsher radiation level is in the inner tracker region. The particle flux is constituted by the primary particles emerging from the interaction point and by the albedo neutrons from the calorimeter. The radiation level the detectors and electronics have to withstand can be expressed as function of 1 MeV neutron equivalent fluence. Figure1.5 [1.6] shows the neutron and charged fluxes per year at different radii in the CMS tracking cavity and Table 1.1 reports the annual 1-MeV equivalent fluence for the ATLAS inner detector region. Fig. 1.4 (a) (b) (a) The CMS and (b) ATLAS inner trackers with Si pixels, SemiConductor (Si) Tracker, and TRT (Transition Radiation Tracker) The 1 MeV equivalent fluences range then between 0.3 10 13 cm -2 to 1 10 14 cm -2 per year of LHC operation, depending on the radial position. Almost certainly, this severe radiation environment will cause the failure of the most irradiated devices after a time of operations shorter than the 10 years planned for the LHC detectors. The improvement of the survival time 26

of the silicon detectors has already dictated some design solution for the detector modules. Cooling pipes have been introduced in order to remove the excessive heating due to the increased leakage current caused by the radiation damage. For the same reason, the detectors will be kept at low temperature. The use of silicon that is more radiation resistant than the high resistivity silicon presently foreseen for the detector fabrication would give an important help to the detector design in view of longer and safer operations of the LHC tracker. Fig. 1.5 - Neutron and charged fluxes per year at different radii in the CMS tracking cavity [1.6] 1.3 The ROSE (CERN-R&D 48) collaboration The radiation damage suffered by silicon detectors at LHC can make the detector unusable above a certain fluence threshold. CERN s RD48 or ROSE (R&D On Silicon for future Experiments) Collaboration has been started in 1996 to investigate the possible radiation hardening of silicon detectors [1.7]. The collaboration involves more than 30 institutes in Europe and in United States and has close collaboration with silicon single-crystal producers and detector manufacturers. The objectives of the collaboration are to develop radiation hard detectors that can operate beyond the limits of present devices 27

and that then can insure guaranteed operation for the whole lifetime of the LHC experimental program. to make recommendation to experiments on the optimum silicon to be used for detectors and quality control procedures required to insure optimal radiation tolerance. The radiation damage in silicon detector introduces electrically active defects resulting from the creation of stable complexes between the primary defects and other defects or impurities that are always present in silicon. It is impossible to affect the radiation damage itself, but it is possible to modify in a suitable way the electrical activity of the secondary permanent defects by means of the deliberate introduction of various impurities into the silicon bulk. The identification of appropriate chemical species and their optimum concentration is the key idea in the progress of the radiation hardening of silicon [1.8]. For that purpose, silicon wafers with addition of different concentrations of oxygen, carbon and tin have been produced and tested. Besides to the silicon crystal engineering, the work on the radiation hardening led to the identification of parameters able to push further the maximum tolerable fluence of standard silicon detectors. Those parameters are the choice of the initial resistivity and the operation temperature of the silicon detectors. Radius n p p [cm] Flux Flux Flux π ± Kaon Total Flux Flux Flux 11.5 1.3 0.74 0.57 6.1 1.3 9.9 20 0.63 0.30 0.18 2.3 0.42 3.9 52 0.30 0.065 0.027 0.46 0.055 0.91 79 0.21 0.026 0.0093 0.17 0.025 0.45 105 0.19 0.016 0.0040 0.064 0.012 0.29 Table 1.1 Annual fluxes expected in silicon due to various damaging particles, expressed as the 1 MeV Equivalent neutron flux as a function of radial position for the ATLAS inner tracker. Flux units of the damaging particles are 10 13 (1 MeV) neutrons cm -2 yr -1. 28

The work presented in this thesis has been performed in the framework of the ROSE collaboration. The radiation tolerance studies have been performed by monitoring the electrical characteristic of detectors made from different materials as a function of the radiation fluence and the time after irradiation. Besides to the radiation tolerance, the study of the charge transport in silicon has been carried out and the results are presented in Chapter 7. 29