Use of reciprocity calibrated accelerometer standards for performing routine laboratory comparison calibrations. Technical paper 226

Similar documents
10 Measurement of Acceleration, Vibration and Shock Transducers

Vibration Measurements Vibration Instrumentation. MCE371: Vibrations. Prof. Richter. Department of Mechanical Engineering. Handout 11 Fall 2011

Lecture 19. Measurement of Solid-Mechanical Quantities (Chapter 8) Measuring Strain Measuring Displacement Measuring Linear Velocity

Characterizing Electrodynamic Shakers

Calibrating a Pressure Transducer, Accelerometer, and Spring System

Measurement Techniques for Engineers. Motion and Vibration Measurement

Chapter 7 Vibration Measurement and Applications

DEVELOPMENT OF DROP WEIGHT IMPACT TEST MACHINE

Basic Principle of Strain Gauge Accelerometer. Description of Strain Gauge Accelerometer

Piezoelectric Resonators ME 2082

Electrical Circuits Lab Series RC Circuit Phasor Diagram

Electrodynamic transduction

Lecture 20. Measuring Pressure and Temperature (Chapter 9) Measuring Pressure Measuring Temperature MECH 373. Instrumentation and Measurements

Laboratory I: Impedance

0-2 Operations with Complex Numbers

0-2 Operations with Complex Numbers

Core Technology Group Application Note 3 AN-3

Measurement of Electrical Resistance and Ohm s Law

MCE603: Interfacing and Control of Mechatronic Systems. Chapter 1: Impedance Analysis for Electromechanical Interfacing

STRAIN GAUGE MEASUREMENT

Glossary Innovative Measurement Solutions

Impedance and Loudspeaker Parameter Measurement

Measuring Properties of Piezoelectric Ceramics

Resonant Column and Torsional Cyclic Shear System

Bridge Measurement 2.1 INTRODUCTION Advantages of Bridge Circuit

7.Piezoelectric, Accelerometer and Laser Sensors

The RC Time Constant

MODULE-4 RESONANCE CIRCUITS

Pre-Lab. Introduction

Applicability of Self-Powered Synchronized Electric Charge Extraction (SECE) Circuit for Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting

Mechatronics II Laboratory EXPERIMENT #1 MOTOR CHARACTERISTICS FORCE/TORQUE SENSORS AND DYNAMOMETER PART 1

Prepare for this experiment!

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

What s Your (real or imaginary) LCR IQ?

Test Report. Force applied by the Transducer of the Frequencer TM, model Written by: Bruno Tardif, P.Eng. Dymedso Inc.

RLC Circuits. 1 Introduction. 1.1 Undriven Systems. 1.2 Driven Systems

Single Phase Parallel AC Circuits

PIEZOELECTRIC MATERIALS USED FOR PORTABLE

Considerations for using charge amplifiers with high temperature piezoelectric accelerometers. Technical Paper 339

MAE106 Laboratory Exercises Lab # 6 - Vibrating systems

Biosensors and Instrumentation: Tutorial 2

FORCE LIMITED VIBRATION TESTING OF CASSINI SPACECRAFT COSMIC DUST ANALYSER

Vibration Testing. an excitation source a device to measure the response a digital signal processor to analyze the system response

The Strain Gauge. James K Beard, Ph.D. Rowan Hall Auditorium November 2, 2006

Dust collecting plates. Electromagnetic vibration exciter. Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the ESP system

The LM741C Integrated Circuit As A Differential Amplifier Building The Electronic Thermometer

Mechatronics II Laboratory EXPERIMENT #1: FORCE AND TORQUE SENSORS DC Motor Characteristics Dynamometer, Part I

Module I Module I: traditional test instrumentation and acquisition systems. Prof. Ramat, Stefano

THERMAL IMPEDANCE (RESPONSE) TESTING OF DIODES

Transactions on the Built Environment vol 22, 1996 WIT Press, ISSN

PIEZOELECTRIC VS MEMS: FUTURE OF THE VIBRATION SENSORS. George Zusman, Ph.D., D.Sc. Vibration Measurement Solutions, Inc.

Vibration Testing. Typically either instrumented hammers or shakers are used.

AE60 INSTRUMENTATION & MEASUREMENTS DEC 2013

The secondary winding have equal no. of turns. The secondary windings are placed identically on either side of the primary winding.

The Use of Multiphysics Models in the Design and Simulation of Magnetostrictive Transducers. Dr. Julie Slaughter ETREMA Products, Inc Ames, IA

On the force drop off phenomenon in shaker testing in experimental modal analysis

Temperature Measurements

Acceleration levels of dropped objects. Technical paper 321

Driven Harmonic Oscillator

Qualification Test Report. Modular Plugs, Unshielded and Shielded

INTRODUCTION. Description

EE 205 Dr. A. Zidouri. Electric Circuits II. Two-Port Circuits Two-Port Parameters. Lecture #42

Wheatstone Bridge Nonlinearity

DYNAMIC BALANCING OF ROTATING MACHINERY EXPERIMENT

LINEAR CIRCUIT ANALYSIS (EED) U.E.T. TAXILA 09

Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics

Unit 57: Mechatronic System

Module 2 Mechanics of Machining. Version 2 ME IIT, Kharagpur

Displacement at very low frequencies produces very low accelerations since:

PRINCIPLES OF. Performance Objective Critical Attributes Benchmarks/Assessment

6. The default plot created by Excel meets all of the requirements for a formal report plot in ME 360.

Lab 4 RC Circuits. Name. Partner s Name. I. Introduction/Theory

Review of Anemometer Calibration Standards

Classification of services in Acoustics, Ultrasound and Vibration

Physics 4 Spring 1989 Lab 5 - AC Circuits

Experiment 9 Equivalent Circuits

Exercise 2: Bending Beam Load Cell

Prepare for this experiment!

Dynamic Behaviour of the Rubber Isolator Under Heavy Static Loads in Aerospace Systems

ENSC387: Introduction to Electromechanical Sensors and Actuators LAB 3: USING STRAIN GAUGES TO FIND POISSON S RATIO AND YOUNG S MODULUS

161 Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Goals Experimental Apparatus Background Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

Strain, Force, and Pressure

Committee Draft No. 99 To be combined with T-150 as a method B. Determination of Natural Frequency and Flexural Modulus by Experimental Modal Analysis

DAMPING CONTROL OF A PZT MULTILAYER VIBRATION USING NEGATIVE IMPEDANCE CIRCUIT

Why You Can t Ignore Those Vibration Fixture Resonances Peter Avitabile, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts

Section 2.2 : Electromechanical. analogies PHILIPE HERZOG AND GUILLAUME PENELET

CHARACTERISATION OF VIBRATORY, PULSATION AND NOISE SOURCES

2.0 Theory. 2.1 Ground Vibration Test

CURRENT LOOPS George W. Younkin, P.E. Life Fellow IEEE Industrial Controls Research, Inc. Fond du Lac, Wisconsin

Adaptives Energy Harvesting für Condition Monitoring Anwendungen im maritimen Umfeld

FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF AN INSTRUMENT

c. VH: Heating voltage between the collector and emitter.

Structures - Experiment 3B Sophomore Design - Fall 2006

Exercise 1: RC Time Constants

Solved Problems. Electric Circuits & Components. 1-1 Write the KVL equation for the circuit shown.

MIL-STD-750 NOTICE 5 METHOD

LECTURE 12. STEADY-STATE RESPONSE DUE TO ROTATING IMBALANCE

Two Port Networks. Definition of 2-Port Network A two-port network is an electrical network with two separate ports for input and output

The Approximating Impedance

Study of Rupture Directivity in a Foam Rubber Physical Model

Transcription:

Use of reciprocity calibrated accelerometer standards for performing routine laboratory comparison calibrations Technical paper 6

Use of reciprocity calibrated accelerometer standards for performing routine laboratory comparison calibrations The reciprocity calibration of piezoelectric accelerometer standards is described in detail. The reciprocity calibration method was studied and developed in the 1960 s, and it remains a highly accurate and repeatable method. These standards are now routinely used to calibrate other accelerometers by the comparison method at frequencies up to 10,000 Hz. This method is seldom found in the typical laboratory, however many accelerometer manufactures and calibration laboratories use this highly accurate method. This paper is intended to provide a better understanding of this method. Introduction The early reciprocity calibrations were performed using separate electrodynamic velocity transducers not mounted on shakers. These transducers were connected mechanically as required by the reciprocity procedure. Later, the reciprocity method was used at low frequencies to calibrate an electrodynamic velocity standard built into an electrodynamic shaker. Further research made it possible to perform reciprocity calibrations at high frequencies near and above shaker resonances as well as at low frequencies. This method has been used at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to calibrate primary vibration standards. This paper deals with the reciprocity calibration of piezoelectric accelerometer standards mounted temporarily on an electrodynamic shaker. The reciprocity calibration procedure is simplified for use at low frequencies below resonances. Instead of performing the reciprocity calibration at high frequencies, the constancy of the piezoelectric standard sensitivity as a function of frequency is verified by a comparison calibration performed with another piezoelectric standard previously calibrated at NIST. Both reciprocity calibrated electrodynamic and piezoelectric vibration standards are used routinely to calibrate accelerometers by the comparison method. Simply measuring the ratio of the test accelerometer and standard accelerometer outputs completes the comparison calibration. The use of the piezoelectric standard has the advantage that the comparison calibration of other accelerometers may be performed at frequencies up to 10,000 Hz and higher. With the electrodynamic standard, good results are obtained only up to,000 Hz. Another advantage is that the piezoelectric standard is portable and can be used on various shakers. Reciprocity theory The reciprocity theory for calibrating vibration standards requires that the shaker and standard operate in the linear amplitude range; i.e., standard voltage is proportional to motion, etc. The theory shows that the reciprocity relation exists for the driver coil or, more specifically, that the ratio of the driver coil current to force produced at the mounting table (when the shaker is constrained from movement) equals the ratio of the velocity at the mounting table to the driver coil voltage produced (where the coil is open circuit). The driver coil in the electrodynamic shaker provides the reciprocal transducer necessary for the calibration. The theory also indicates that the sensitivity of the electrodynamic vibration standard in the shaker is determined from the measurements described by the following equations: Where: Sv = a+byp Sv = sensitivity of electrodynamic standard, volts/in./sec a = 0.01711 ( iπfjr) b = 6.601 Q ( R/jπfJ Yp = mechanical impedance of test accelerometer, lb/in./sec. i = f = (-1), the 90 vector frequency, Hz J = Intercept of plot of weight to transfer admittance ratio lb/mho Q = slope of plot of weight transfer admittance ratio, ohms R = voltage ratio, volts/volt The terms Q and b become zero at frequencies below shaker resonance where there is no relative motion between the vibration standard and the mounting surface where the test accelerometers are attached. In

addition, it becomes unnecessary to measure Yp, the mechanical impedance of the test accelerometer. The test accelerometer is not attached during the reciprocity calibration. To make the above equations applicable to piezoelectric accelerometer standards, the term a is divided by iπf. Also, the term a is multiplied by 1,000 and by 386 to convert the sensitivity to mv and g units of acceleration. These operations convert the above equation for Sv. to: S a = 635 ( JR/if) (1) S a = piezoelectric accelerometer standard sensitivity, mv/g The other terms are the same as defined above. The term J is computed from transfer admittance measurements made with various weights attached to the shaker. Best accuracy is achieved by making this measurement with each of ten different weights attached. In addition, the transfer admittance is measured with no weight attached. The differences between the transfer admittances with each weight and no weight attached are computed. The errors in these differences decrease as the weight is increased. This decrease in error is taken into account by the following equations: Jr n +Qr n Wn = n Y nr Jr n W n + Q r n W n = n W n Y nr Where: n = integer values; 1,,3,.......... Wn = weights of equal increments and the other terms described below The weights selected are determined by the shaker characteristics. It is preferable to have the largest weight equal to about two times the weight of the moving parts of the shaker as specified by the manufacturer. For the reciprocity calibration described in this paper, ten weights are used, the largest weighing one pound. Therefore, Wn=0.1, 0., 0.3, 1 pound. The values of n and Wn are substituted in the above equations. The equations are solved simultaneously eliminating Qr: J = 0.0404 Σ n Y nr 0.050 Σ n W n Y nr () Where: Ynr = Wn/(G n -G o ) (3) And where G n = transfer admittance, ratio of driver coil current to vibration standard voltage output, obtained with each weight attached to the shaker G o = transfer admittance with no weight attached to the shaker The subscript r of the term J is omitted in equation since only the real part of J is required for low frequency reciprocity calibrations. Also, equation 3 includes more terms if the calibration is performed at high frequencies near or above axial resonances in the shaker moving parts. In other words, equations and 3 assume there is no phase shift between the driver coil current and the output of the piezoelectric accelerometer standard being calibrated. This assumption is easily satisfied at frequencies up to at least 500 Hz for most commercially available shakers. The voltage ratio term R in equation 1 is the voltage output of the piezoelectric accelerometer standard divided by the voltage output of the driver coil when the shaker is driven by a second shaker and the driver coil in the first shaker is open circuit. An electronic counter is used to measure the frequency at which this voltage ratio is measured. Equation 1 assumes that the phase angle shift of this voltage ratio is 90. Again this assumption is satisfied because the calibration is performed at frequencies that are small compared to the axial resonant frequency of the shaker. Reciprocity procedure and results The calibration procedure is summarized as follows: 1. Calibrate the ten weights, 0.1 to 1 pound on a scale balance.. Measure the transfer admittance, ratio of driver coil current to piezoelectric accelerometer voltage output, with each of the weights and with no weight attached to the shaker. 3. Make the summations of the transfer admittance measurements as indicated by equations and 3. 4. Measure the ratio of the piezoelectric standard output to open circuit driver coil output when the shaker is driven by a second shaker. 5. Measure the frequency at which Step 4 is performed. 6. Compute the sensitivity of the piezoelectric accelerometer standard from equation 1 using the values of J, R, and f from steps 3, 4 and 5 respectively. 3

The reciprocity calibration procedure can be illustrated by the following sample calibration. Figure 1: Block diagram of the set-up used for transfer admittance measurements. Transfer Admittance Measurements The setup and block diagram for the transfer admittance measurements are illustrated in Figure 1. The voltage divider is adjusted until the output of the voltage divider is exactly equal to the voltage across the precision 1 ohm resistor. The oscilloscope is required to verify that the phase angle is zero degrees. The shaker selected is satisfactory if the phase angle is zero degrees, if it is free of excessive transverse motion, and if the distortion in the sinusoidal motion is negligible, preferably less than one per cent. The shaker should have these characteristics throughout the frequency range up to approximately 500 Hz. The transfer admittance, G n = 1/D n (4) Table 1: Transfer admittance measurements on piezoelectric standard number 10. Voltage Ratio Measurement The block diagram for the voltage ratio measurement is illustrated in Figure. where D n is the setting of the voltage divider. This transfer admittance is measured and computed with each of the ten weights attached to the shaker. The values of G n from a recent reciprocity calibration and the corresponding values of Y nr are given in Table. 1. The summations of the products of n Ynr and n WnYnr are made for all the values of n. These summations are substituted into equation and J is computed. For the measurements listed in Table 1, J = 0.01503 lb-volt/amp. Figure : Block diagram for voltage ratio measurements The voltage divider is adjusted until its output is equal to the output of the piezoelectric accelerometer standard. The oscilloscope indicates the phase angle is 90. The counter is used to measure the frequency. The voltage ratio is, R = D r (5) 4

where Dr is the setting on the voltage divider. The value of R obtained on PX-SP46 piezoelectric standard S/N 10 was 0.0479 volt/volt at 50 Hz. Computation These values of R, f, and J determined above are substituted into equation 1. This computation indicates the sensitivity of piezoelectric accelerometer standard No. 10 is 10.00 mv/g. In addition to the above reciprocity calibration, this accelerometer standard was calibrated at NIST. The average of the 38 calibration points reported in the frequency range from 10 Hz to 4,000 Hz was 10.0 mv/g with a standard deviation of 0.5 per cent, NB Lab. No. 13.3/180699. This agreement between the two independent calibrations is better than expected. Reciprocity calibration accuracy The calibration results described above are listed in column 8 of Table. Also included in this table are calibration results obtained on other vibration standards calibrated by the reciprocity method. All the results are reciprocity calibrations on piezoelectric accelerometer standards except those in the second column that are reciprocity calibrations on the electrodynamic velocity standard. The accelerometers are specially designed to minimize calibration error due to environmental effects of temperature, strain, etc. The sensitivity of each of the standards is a multiple of 10 to simplify the use of the standard. These sensitivities are obtained by inserting the required capacity between the standard accelerometer and standard amplifier. For use with voltage amplifiers, the capacity is placed in parallel with the accelerometer. For those standards used with charge amplifiers, the required capacity is inserted in series with the accelerometer. In the case of the electrodynamic standard, the proper value of resistance is put in series with the coil to obtain the desired sensitivity. Table also lists the standard deviation expressed as a percent of the average sensitivity for the various reciprocity calibrations performed on each standard. Table : Summary of reciprocity calibration results on vibration standards. 5

Table was generated in the 1960 s during qualification of the reciprocity method. These results are applicable today. Table 3 gives an error analysis of the reciprocity calibration method. The individual errors are estimated for the various error sources present. The final estimated error is determined from the square root of the sum of the individual errors squared. these piezoelectric standards up to 10,000Hz, a small shaker is used. First, the piezoelectric standard is used to calibrate the accelerometer in the small shaker and second, the test accelerometer is calibrated against the accelerometer in the small shaker. To accomplish this, a standard accelerometer built into a case suitable for attaching test accelerometers was developed. This standard accelerometer is reciprocity calibrated and used directly to calibrate single axis piezoelectric accelerometers at frequencies up to 10,000 Hz. 1) Assumes 90 phase shift ) Assumes 0 phase shift 3) Temperature, strain, acoustic, etc. 4) Determined from the root mean square of individual errors listed in the table To demonstrate its use, the new piezoelectric standard was reciprocity calibrated and used to perform comparison calibrations on typical accelerometers. The setup and block diagram for performing these comparison calibrations is shown in Figure 3, set-up 3A, 3B. The voltage divider is adjusted until the test accelerometer output is equal to the output of the voltage divider. The sensitivity of the test accelerometer is equal to the sensitivity of the standard accelerometer multiplied by the setting on the voltage divider. If the output of the test accelerometer is larger than the standard accelerometer, the voltage divider is connected to the test accelerometer and the procedure is changed accordingly. Table 3: Analysis of sensitivity errors for primary vibration standards calibrated by the reciprocity method. The error of 0.4% in Table 3 for the sensitivity of the piezoelectric accelerometer standard agrees closely with the standard deviations listed in Table. Also, the difference between the estimated error in Table 3 and standard deviation in Table for the electrodynamic velocity standard is considered insignificant. In addition to the low frequency reciprocity calibration, it is necessary to verify the frequency response of the piezoelectric accelerometer standards. This is done by a comparison calibration referenced to an accelerometer standard previously calibrated at NIST. These calibrations are performed at frequencies up to 10,000 Hz. Sample comparison calibration The reciprocity-calibrated standards described above are used routinely in several calibrators. The 958A fixture used with these standards is satisfactory for calibrating all single axes piezoelectric accelerometers up to 4,000 Hz. However, a special fixture must be used for the calibration of triaxial accelerometers. In order to use Figure 3A Figure 3B: Set-up and block diagram for routine comparison calibrations using the reciprocity method. 3A is the actual shaker used in the Meggitt calibration laboratory. 6

Typical calibration results are shown in Figure 4. The accelerometers selected are representative of the various piezoelectric accelerometers presently in wide use. The weight of these three different accelerometers ranges from gm to 78 gm, and the sensitivity ranges from approximately 4 to 50 mv/g. The calibration results indicate the suitability of the piezoelectric standard accelerometer illustrated in Figure 3 for performing routine comparison calibrations at frequencies up to 10,000 Hz. Measurement % Error Standard sensitivity (50Hz) 0.4 Standard sensitivity (10-900 Hz) 1.0 Standard sensitivity (900 10,000 Hz).1 Voltage ratio (10 10,000 Hz) 0. Relative motion (900 10,000 Hz) 0.5 External capacity 0.5 Amplifier gain 0. Amplifier frequency response 0.5 Frequency -- Environmental effects 0.5 Estimated error (50 Hz) 0.9* Estimated error (10 900 Hz) 1.5* Estimated error 900 10,000 Hz).3* *Determined by root mean square of applicable individual errors. Table 4: Estimated error of sensitivity for accelerometers calibrated by the comparison method with piezoelectric accelerometer standards These errors are typical of those achieved in modern calibration laboratories. Calibration differences between laboratories of less than % at low frequencies are common. The slightly larger errors near 10,000 Hz can be consistently maintained by careful selection of accelerometer standards and shakers. Figure 4: Typical comparison calibration results obtained on various accelerometers using a reciprocity calibrated piezoelectric accelerometer standard. The increase in sensitivity at the high frequencies agrees with theoretical response corresponding to the accelerometer s resonance. Comparison calibration accuracy An analysis of the errors of the comparison calibration results is given in Table 4. The estimated error of 0.9% in the sensitivity of the test accelerometer sensitivity is previously determined by the reciprocity method, which is an absolute calibration. This error is applicable at 50 Hz, the frequency of the reciprocity calibration. The estimated error in the test accelerometer sensitivity at other frequencies is larger because the calibration errors of the NIST are included. Summary The reciprocity calibration procedure described provides an accurate means for establishing primary vibration standards. The procedure is simplified by performing the reciprocity calibration at low frequencies below resonances in the shaker. The sensitivity of the reciprocity calibrated piezoelectric standard is verified at higher frequencies by a comparison calibration to a standard previously calibrated at NIST. The sensitivity of the piezoelectric standard is determined with an estimated error of 0.4%. Meggitt (Orange County), Inc. 014. All rights reserved. TP 6 111715 7