Intramolecular Hydrogen bonding for Lattice fluid EOS. J.H.Lee and C.S.Lee Chemical and Biological engineering in Korea Univ.

Similar documents
On intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonding

CHEM-102 EXAM I Name Fall 2004 Section

COSMO-RS Theory. The Basics

Comparing the Strength of Intermolecular Forces

1. What is the difference between intermolecular forces and intramolecular bonds? Variations in the Boiling Point of Noble Gases

Overview. Types of Solutions. Intermolecular forces in solution. Concentration terms. Colligative properties. Osmotic Pressure 2 / 46

QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Organic Chemistry. QuickTime and a are needed to see this picture.

Patrick: An Introduction to Medicinal Chemistry 5e Chapter 01

Born-Haber Cycle: ΔH hydration

Professor K. Intermolecular forces

Intermolecular Forces and Liquids and Solids Chapter 11

2. Derive ideal mixing and the Flory-Huggins models from the van der Waals mixture partition function.

Nestor S. Valera Ateneo de Manila. Chapter 12 - Intermolecular Forces

Solvents and solvent selection for chromatography. Prof. Colin F. Poole Department of Chemistry Wayne State University USA

Ch. 10 in- Class Exercise

When intermolecular forces are strong, the atoms, molecules, or ions are strongly attracted to each other, and draw closer together.

Regents review Organic chemistry

Subject : Chemistry Class : XII Chapter-2.Solutions Work Sheet ( WS 2. 1) Topic- 2.1 Henry s & Raoult s Laws

Dipole-Dipole Interactions London Dispersion Forces

ULTRASONIC INVESTIGATIONS IN A LIQUID MIXTURE OF ETHYLENEGLYCOL WITH n-butanol

Quick Review. 1. Hybridization. 2. Delocalization. 3. We will not be talking about Molecular Orbital Model.

CHAPTER 6 Intermolecular Forces Attractions between Particles

Lecture 2. The framework to build materials and understand properties

Chemistry Review: Atoms

IJST. Dielectric Relaxation Studies of 2-Alkoxyethanol with o-anisidine in benzene using frequency domain (X band) technique

Chapter 14 Organic Compounds That Contain Oxygen, Halogen, or Sulfur

Intermolecular Forces and Physical Properties

Use the Equations given in your notes to solve the Colligative Property Questions. Freezing Boiling Point ( C)

Intermolecular Forces

Dipole Moment Studies of H-Bonded Complexes of Anilines with Alcohol

CPT-26 ANSWERS 73. (1) 145. (4) 2. (1) 74. (3) 146. (4) 3. (3) 75. (2) 147. (3) 4. (2) 5. (4) 76. (4) 77. (2) 148. (2) 149. (3) 6. (3) 78.

Simulation of Ethanol Dehydration Using Cyclohexane as an Entrainer

Indian School Muscat

CE 530 Molecular Simulation

Solutions. Chapter 14 Solutions. Ion-Ion Forces (Ionic Bonding) Attraction Between Ions and Permanent Dipoles. Covalent Bonding Forces

Chapter 11: Properties of Solutions - Their Concentrations and Colligative Properties. Chapter Outline

Chem 1100 Pre-Test 3. Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Molecular Geometry: VSEPR model stand for valence-shell electron-pair repulsion and predicts the 3D shape of molecules that are formed in bonding.

Water. Water participates in H-bonding with biomolecules.

video 14.4 isomers isomers Isomers have the molecular formula but are rearranged in a structure with different properties. Example: Both C 4 H 10

1 Which of the compounds shown are in the same homologous series? 1 CH 3 OH 2 CH 3 CH 2 OH 3 CH 3 COOH C 3 CH 2 CH 2 OH

Learning Guide for Chapter 3 - Infrared Spectroscopy

Chapter #16 Liquids and Solids

Solutions and Intermolecular Forces

Evaporation and Intermolecular Forces

3a. Oxalic acid should be the most readily soluble in water because it is polar and can form hydrogen bonds. by simple mixing.

Chapter 11 SOLIDS, LIQUIDS AND GASES Pearson Education, Inc.

Investigating the Phase of High Entropy. Pressure

2.26 Intermolecular Forces

Bonds & IMAFs in Liquids, Solids, and Solutions

OFB Chapter 6 Condensed Phases and Phase Transitions

Hydrogen Bonding & Molecular Design Peter

National 5 Chemistry. Unit 2 Nature s Chemistry Summary Notes

AP Chemistry Chapter 22 - Organic and Biological Molecules


MA Selection Chemistry example test questions. Time: 180 minutes. This test consists of four main questions Main

Introduction to Alkyl Halides, Alcohols, Ethers, Thiols, and Sulfides

Cell Compounds, Bonds, Reactions - 1

Calderglen High School CfE Higher Chemistry. Chemical Changes & Structure Structure and Bonding. Page 1 of 21

CH.7 Fugacities in Liquid Mixtures: Models and Theories of Solutions

Ultrasonic Study of Molecular Interaction in Binary Mixture at Different Temperatures (303 K 318 K)

Homework 01. Phase Changes and Solutions

DIELECTRIC STUDIES OF BINARY MIXTURES OF ALKOXY ETHANOLS AND ANILINE AT 9.85 GHz MICROWAVE FREQUENCY

One Q partial negative, the other partial negative Ø H- bonding particularly strong. Abby Carroll 2

Intermolecular Forces and Liquids and Solids. Chapter 11. Copyright The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for

Science 20 - Solution concentration

Modeling of the solubility of Naproxen and Trimethoprim in different solvents at different temperature

The Basics of General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry

Kirkcaldy High School CfE Higher Chemistry. Chemical Changes & Structure Structure and Bonding

Chemical bonding & structure

POGIL: Principles of Solubility

The fundamental difference between. particles.

CAMI EDUCATION PHYSICAL SCIENCES PAPER 2 MEMORANDUM CHEMISTRY - GRADE 12 AUGUST 2012

Practice Packet Unit 11: Organic Chemistry

Ashwani Gupta. Mb: Class IX-X: X: Math & Science Class XI-XII: XII: Accts., Eco. & B. Stds. Carbon and its compounds.

Chem 1100 Pre-Test 3. Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Intermolecular and Intramolecular Forces. Introduction

Atoms can form stable units called molecules by sharing electrons.

CHAPTER 3 HW SOLUTIONS: INTERMOLECULAR FORCES

Alkanes and Cycloalkanes

ngac (ttn793) H11: Solids and Liquids mccord (51600) 1

Why is water usually a liquid and not a gas? Why does liquid water boil at such a high temperature for such a small molecule? Why does ice float on

1 Which of the following compounds has the lowest solubility in water? (4 pts)

Original Articles. 1. Introduction. You Zhou 1,, Liwei Xue 1, Kai Yi 1, Li Zhang 1, Seung Kon Ryu 2 and Ri Guang Jin 1

SCH 4U Unit Test Forces and Molecular Properties. 1. Fill in each table as done on the assignment. Including the oxidation state of the central atom:

CHEM 112 Name: (Last) (First). Section No.: VISUALIZING ORGANIC REACTIONS THROUGH USE OF MOLECULAR MODELS

Ch 12 and 13 Practice Problems

Intermolecular forces

Intermolecular forces are classified into four major types.

Sparks CH301. WHY IS EVERYTHING SO DIFFERENT? Gas, Liquid or Solid? UNIT 3 Day 7

CHM151 Quiz Pts Fall 2013 Name: Due at time of final exam. Provide explanations for your answers.

CHEMISTRY MIDTERM # 1 answer key October 05, 2010

Due by 3:00 PM Tuesday, June 26 NO LATE PAPERS ACCEPTED!

5.3 ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

ก ก ก Intermolecular Forces: Liquids, Solids, and Phase Changes

Intermolecular forces Liquids and Solids

11.1 Intermolecular Forces Keeping Matter Together

0. Matter can exist in different states A. The state depends on the (and ). Of interest to living things.

CHEM 1032 PRACTICE EXAM I CLASS SPRING 2017

Evaporation and Intermolecular Attractions

Transcription:

Intramolecular Hydrogen bonding for Lattice fluid EOS J.H.Lee and C.S.Lee Chemical and Biological engineering in Korea Univ.

Scope Intramolecular Hydrogen bonding Models for intramolecular HB Proposed Model and model parameter Results Conclusion

Intramolecular Hydrogen Bond Intramolecular hydrogen bond A hydrogen bond formed between two functional groups of the same molecule Intramolecuar HB plays an important role in Protein folding

Intramolecular HB - Polymer Cloud-point pressure is decreased owing to intramolecular HB at polar solvents (Gregg et al, 994) Blank PIB Cloud point pressure Medium Monohydroxy PIB Large Dihydroxy PIB Small

Previous Work Ghonasgi(994) For intermolecular association, Wertheim s thoery For intramolecular association, Ghonasgi(994) s theory was used. X X A o ( X X o + ρx A ) X X 3 2 A intra o + ( ρ intra A inter inter AB ρ ρx intra X o int er o inter o + )( X + X A intra o ) 2 intra X o 2ρ inter X A 2 ρ ( inter ) 2 0

Previous Work Lattice HB Developed by Brinkley(998) and Missopolinou (999) Ω HB Ω intra Ω inter doner acceptor HB

Brinkley (998) Analysis of Intra- and Intermolecular HB of Glycolether using FTIR experiments. Inter : - Intramolecular Inter : -2 H-bond OH-OH H-bond OH-Ether One way of forming intramolecular HB for molecule ( Q intra )

Problem Brinkley s theory No consideration about distributing Intramolecular HB molecules among total molecules P P Q inter intra inter cm ρ N c B T ( N ( N B M B)!(3N B)! )!(3N B M )! M! B : Intramolecular HB pair M : Intermolecular HB pair c B : probability for ring formation Q HB QintraQinterPintra Pinter B M F exp( kt B )exp( F kt M )

Missopolinou (999) First formalisms for equation-of-state H-bond OH-OH H-bond OH-Ether Donor population Acceptor population Acceptor 2 population : - OH 2 : -O- Q HB B 2 2 ( N!) (2 N B)! cm ρ M ( ) ( cb ) BN!! N! N!( N N )!(2 N B N )! N 2 0 2 T B

Problem Missopolinou s model If sequence of numbering is reversed, partition function is different. Acceptor 2 population Donor population Acceptor population Q HB B! N! N 2 B 2 (2N )! N!( N B)!! N!( N N )!(2N 0 c ( )! NT M ρ B N 2 ) M ( c B ) B

This Work Correct formalism of Q intra and Q inter General intramolecular HB model for any molecules Assumption Number of distributing intermolecular molecules N B A2 Qintra () c exp( B ) ( N B)! B! kt CH 3 O CH 2 HO CH 2 CH 3 O CH 2 CH 2 OH HO CH 2 CH 2 O CH 3 A intra A ij (inter)

This Work 2-methoxy ethanol N B A2 Qintra () c exp( B ) ( N B)! B! kt Q inter ( N B)! N rh ( ) N! N!( N B N N )!( N N )! N! N 2 2 ( xn B)! r A A N N ( xn B N )! N! N kt kt Ethylene-glycol H N2 ( ) exp( ) 2 2 2 2 r r N HO CH 2 N B intra Qintra () c exp( B ) ( N B)! B! kt Q A (2 N B)! (2 N B)! r A N H N ( ) exp( ) inter N!(2 N B N)!(2 N B N) Nr kt HO CH 2

Result FTIR regression Hydrogen bonding parameter from 35 o C and 45 o C experiment data Pure parameter fitting VLE calculation Comparison with Intra HB and without Intra HB

FTIR regression 0.030 Mole Fraction Bonded 0.025 0.020 0.05 0.00 Intramolecular H-bonding Intermolecular H-bonding Model Col vs Col 5 0.005 0.000 0.00 0.0 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 2-Methoxyethanol Mole Fraction in n-hexane Fig.. Hydrogen bonding in 2-methoxy ethanol + hexane system at 35 o C

FTIR regression Mole Fraction Bonded 0.030 0.035 0.030 0.025 0.025 0.020 0.020 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 Intramolecular H-bonding Intermolecular Intramolecular H-bonding H-bonding Model Intermolecular H-bonding Model Col vs Col 5 0.005 0.005 0.000 0.00 0.0 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 2-Methoxyethanol Mole Fraction in n-hexane Fig. 2. Hydrogen bonding in 2-methoxy ethanol + hexane system at 45 o C

Model characteristics 0 N inter /N intra 0. 0.0 0.00 Gas phase Liquid phase 0.000 300 350 400 450 500 Temp(K) Fig. 3. Inter- and intramolecular hydrogen bond in 2-methoxy ethanol

Pure parameter fitting Regressed intramolecular parameter U HB S HB c Alcohol -4332-2.98 - Ether -2384-2.98-2-methoxyethanol - - 0.005 Pure parameter for 2-methoxy ethanol Inter only r A 7.000 r B 0.0038 r C -0.0024 e A 93.5 e B 0.75 e C 0.62 DP(% ) 4.04 D (%) 0.054 Intra + Inter 7.578 0.05-0.003 23.0-0.090-0.299.8 0.48 00 DP(%) N N i P P 00 ρ calc N calc i i Dρ(%) exp exp i N i ρi

Comparion : VLE calculation 0.6 0.40 0.35 0.5 0.30 0.4 P (bar) 0.25 0.20 0.5 Carmona et al(200) Inter Intra + Inter Col 5 vs Col 4 Col 8 vs Col 7 P (bar) 0.3 0.2 Carmona (200) Inter Intra + Inter Col 5 vs Col 4 Col 8 vs Col 7 0.0 0.05 0. 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8.0 Mole fraction of n-hexane 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8.0 Mole fraction of n-hexane Fig. 4. n-hexane + 2-methoxy ethanol at 40 o C and 50 o C

Comparion : VLE calculation 0.20 P (bar) 0.5 Carmona (200) Inter Intra + Inter Col 5 vs Col 4 Col 8 vs Col 7 0.0 0.05 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8.0 Mole fraction of n-heptane Fig. 5. n-heptane + 2-methoxy ethanol at 50 o C

Comparion : VLE calculation 0.8 0.6 0.25 0.4 0.20 0.2 P (bar) 0.0 0.08 0.06 Carmona (200) Inter Intra + Inter Col 5 vs Col 4 Col 8 vs Col 7 P (bar) 0.5 0.0 Carmona (200) Inter Intra + Inter Col 5 vs Col 4 Col 8 vs Col 7 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8.0 Mole fraction of Cyclohexane (a) Mole fraction of Cyclohexane (b) Fig. 6. n-cyclohexane + 2-methoxy ethanol at (a) 30 (b) 40 and (c) 50 o C

Comparion : VLE calculation 0.40 0.35 0.30 P (bar) 0.25 0.20 0.5 Carmona (200) Inter Intra + Inter Col 5 vs Col 4 Col 8 vs Col 7 0.0 0.05 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8.0 Mole fraction of Cyclohexane (c)

Comparison DP(%) 2.62 4.8 323.5 3.69 5.77 33.5 4.96 6.20 303.5 Cyclohexane 2-methoxyethanol 8.09 5.40 323.5 n-heptane 2-methoxyethanol 5.2 6.0 323.5 5.08 7.23 33.5 n-hexane 2-methoxyethanol Intra and Intermolecular Intermolecular only Temp (K) System N i i calc i P P N DP exp 00 (%)

Conclusion Intramolecular hydrogen bonding based Lattice fluid statistics was proposed which considers the number of distributing molecules with intermolecular bonds Regressed Hydrogen bonding parameter and flexibility parameter showed consistent behavior of FTIR experiment data qualitatively and possibility for application to the equation of state. The models was found applicable to the calculation of VLE of alkane-2-methoxy ethanol in comparison with the model with only intermolecular HB