arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 12 Jan 2016

Similar documents
Determining the Membership of Globular Cluster, M2 with APOGEE Data

MEMBERSHIP ANALYSIS OF GLOBULAR CLUSTER M92 WITH APOGEE (APACHE POINT OBSERVATORY GALACTIC EVOLUTION EXPERIMENT) DATA

The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment. Ricardo Schiavon

Chemical evolution of the Galactic disk using Open Clusters

Detailed chemical abundances of M-dwarf planet hosts from APOGEE observations

Following the evolution of the Galactic disc with Open Clusters

A comparison of stellar atmospheric parameters from the LAMOST and APOGEE datasets

APOGEE APACHE POINT OBSERVATORY GALACTIC EVOLUTION EXPERIMENT. Jennifer Johnson Ohio State University

Resolved Star Formation Surface Density and Stellar Mass Density of Galaxies in the Local Universe. Abstract

Oxygen in red giants from near-infrared OH lines: 3D effects and first results from. Puerto de la Cruz, May 14, 2012! Carlos Allende Prieto!

The Gaia-ESO Survey: Detailed Abundances in the Globular Cluster NGC 4372

Studying stars in M31 GCs using NIRI and GNIRS

arxiv: v3 [astro-ph.sr] 28 Jul 2016

Abundance distribution in the Galactic thick disk

The Composition of the Old, Metal-Rich Open Cluster, NGC 6791

Detection of second-generation asymptotic giant branch stars in metal-poor globular clusters

Exploring the structure and evolu4on of the Milky Way disk

Determination of [α/fe] and its Application to SEGUE F/G Stars. Young Sun Lee

Chemo-dynamical disk modeling. Ivan Minchev Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)

Abundance gradients in the Milky Way for α elements, iron peak elements, barium, lanthanum, and europium ABSTRACT

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 12 Dec 2018

Chemical tagging of FGK stars: testing membership to stellar kinematic groups

The Giant Branches of Open and Globular Clusters in the Infrared as Metallicity Indicators: A Comparison with Theory

W. J. Maciel, R. D. D. Costa IAG/USP

arxiv: v3 [astro-ph.ga] 20 Dec 2016

GALAXIES 626. The Milky Way II. Chemical evolution:

The Thick Thin Disk and the Thin Thick Disk: a New Paradigm from Gaia

Overview of Gaia-ESO Survey results based on high-resolution spectra of FGK-type stars Rodolfo Smiljanic! (Gaia-ESO WG11 co-coordinator)

Age and abundance structure of the central sub-kpc of the Milky Way

ASPCAP Tests with Real Data

The Gaia-ESO Spectroscopic Survey. Survey Co-PIs. Gerry Gilmore (IoA, Cambridge) & Sofia Randich (INAF/Arcetri) >300 CoIs

ISSN Communication. Isolated Galaxies versus Interacting Pairs with MaNGA

Gaia-LSST Synergy. A. Vallenari. INAF, Padova

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 7 Nov 2014

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 9 Dec 2016

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 7 Mar 2015

Stars and Stellar Astrophysics. Kim Venn U. Victoria

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 26 Mar 2018

MaNGA: Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory

ABUNDANCES OF RED GIANTS IN OLD OPEN CLUSTERS. II. BERKELEY 17

The Star Clusters of the Magellanic Clouds

Tristan Cantat-Gaudin

Galactic archaeology with the RAdial Velocity Experiment

STELLAR LIFETIMES AND ABUNDANCE GRADIENTS: HINTS FROM CENTRAL STARS OF PLANETARY NEBULAE

The chemical evolution of the Milky Way

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 4 Dec 2017

The chemical evolution of the Galactic Bulge seen through micro-lensing events

Stellar populations in the Milky Way halo

Chemical enrichment mechanisms in Omega Centauri: clues from neutron-capture elements

The Milky Way Formation Timescale

Spectroscopy of M81 Globular Clusters. Julie B. Nantais & John P. Huchra MMT Science Symposium 5/19/10

Thorium (Th) Enrichment in the Milky Way Galaxy

JINA Observations, Now and in the Near Future

The structure and formation of the Milky Way disks

THE GALACTIC BULGE AND ITS GLOBULAR CLUSTERS: MOS. B. Barbuy

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 28 Nov 2015

SDSS-IV MaStar: a Large, Comprehensive, and High Quality Empirical Stellar Library

THE CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MILKY WAY DISK

Lecture Five: The Milky Way: Structure

Young alpha-enriched giant stars in the solar neighbourhood

CdC-SF Catalogue.II: Application of its Proper Motions to Open Clusters

Using Globular Clusters to. Study Elliptical Galaxies. The View Isn t Bad... Omega Centauri. Terry Bridges Australian Gemini Office M13

Action-based Dynamical Modeling of the Milky Way Disk with Gaia & RAVE

Dust [12.1] Star clusters. Absorb and scatter light Effect strongest in blue, less in red, zero in radio.

ON THE CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MILKY WAY. The Metallicity distribution of the halo in the hierarchical merging paradigm

Stellar populations model predictions in the UV spectral range

Zoccali et al. 2003, A&A, 399, 931. Overview of (old) Galactic components. bulge, thick disk, metal-weak halo. metallicity & age distribution

The HERMES project. Reconstructing Galaxy Formation. Ken Freeman RSAA, ANU. The metallicity distribution in the Milky Way discs Bologna May 2012

The Chemical/Dynamical Evolution of the Galactic Bulge

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 10 May 2012

The Milky Way Tomography with SDSS: II. Stellar Metallicity (Appendix C)

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 10 Dec 2016

RADIAL ABUNDANCE GRADIENTS FROM PLANETARY NEBULAE AT DIFFERENT DISTANCES FROM THE GALACTIC PLANE

The Detailed Chemical Abundance Patterns of M31 Globular Clusters

Massive Stars as Tracers for. Stellar & Galactochemical Evolution

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 23 Mar 2009

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 21 Dec 2001

Reconstructing Fossil Sub-structures of the Galactic Disk: Clues from Abundance Patterns of Old Open Clusters and Moving Groups

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 1 Feb 2015

Introduction to SDSS -instruments, survey strategy, etc

11. Nidever, D. L., Olsen, K., et al. SMASH - Survey of the Magellanic Stellar History, 2017, AJ, submitted

CNO and F abundances in the globular cluster M22 (2012, A&A, 540, 3)

Using globular clusters to test gravity in the weak acceleration regime

THE 2MASS COLOR-MAGNITUDE DIAGRAM OF THE GLOBULAR CLUSTER LYNG8Å7 1

Kinematical decomposition of stellar populations in disc galaxies

Milky Way S&G Ch 2. Milky Way in near 1 IR H-W Rixhttp://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/galarcheo-c15/rix/

Galaxy simulations in the Gaia era. Ivan Minchev Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)

University of Naples Federico II, Academic Year Istituzioni di Astrofisica, read by prof. Massimo Capaccioli. Lecture 16

APOGEE chemical abundances of globular cluster giants in the inner Galaxy

THE QUEST RR LYRAE SURVEY AND HALO SUB-STRUCTURE

ASTRO 310: Galactic & Extragalactic Astronomy Prof. Jeff Kenney

Are open clusters chemically homogeneous? Fan Liu

GALACTIC DOPPELGANGER: THE CHEMICAL SIMILARITY AMONG FIELD STARS AND AMONG STARS WITH A COMMON BIRTH ORIGIN

Colour Magnitude analysis of five old open clusters

Extremely Metal-Poor Stars

The Accretion History of the Milky Way

Distance Measuring Techniques and The Milky Way Galaxy

Lithium abundances and metallicities: trends from metal-poor and AGB/RGB stars

s-processing in the Galactic Disk. I. Super-Solar Abundances of Y, Zr, La, Ce in Young Open Clusters

Data-driven models of stars

Transcription:

Astronomische Nachrichten, 14 January 2016 Chemical abundance gradients from open clusters in the Milky Way disk: results from the APOGEE survey arxiv:1601.03099v1 [astro-ph.ga] 12 Jan 2016 Katia Cunha 1, Peter M. Frinchaboy 2, Diogo Souto 1, Benjamin Thompson 2, Gail Zasowski 3, Carlos Allende Prieto 4, Ricardo Carrera 4, Cristina Chiappini 5, John Donor 2, Anibal García-Hernández 4, Ana Elia García Pérez 4, Michael R. Hayden 6, Jon Holtzman 7, Kelly M. Jackson 2, Jennifer A. Johnson 8, Steven R. Majewski 9, Szabolcs Mészáros 10, Brianne Meyer 2, David L. Nidever 11, Julia O Connell 2, Ricardo P. Schiavon 12, Mathias Schultheis 6, Matthew Shetrone 13, Audrey Simmons 2, Verne V. Smith 14, Olga Zamora 4 1 Observatório Nacional - MCTI, Brazil 2 Texas Christian University, USA 3 NSF AAPF, Johns Hopkins University, USA 4 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias and Universidad de La Laguna, Spain 5 Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam, Germany 6 Observatoire de la Cote d Azur, France 7 New Mexico State University, USA 8 The Ohio State University, USA 9 University of Virginia, USA 10 ELTE Gothard Astrophysical Observatory, Hungary 11 University of Arizona, USA 12 Liverpool John Moores University, UK 13 McDonald Observatory, University of Texas, USA 14 National Optical Astronomy Observatory, USA Received XXXX, accepted XXXX Published online XXXX Key words Chemical abundances Metallicity gradients Open clusters APOGEE survey Metallicity gradients provide strong constraints for understanding the chemical evolution of the Galaxy. We report on radial abundance gradients of Fe, Ni, Ca, Si, and Mg obtained from a sample of 304 red-giant members of 29 disk open clusters, mostly concentrated at galactocentric distances between 8 15 kpc, but including two open clusters in the outer disk. The observations are from the APOGEE survey. The chemical abundances were derived automatically by the ASPCAP pipeline and these are part of the SDSS III Data Release 12. The gradients, obtained from least squares fits to the data, are relatively flat, with slopes ranging from -26 to -33 dex kpc 1 for theα-elements [O/H], [Ca/H], [Si/H] and [Mg/H] and -35 dex kpc 1 and -40 dex kpc 1 for and [Ni/H], respectively. Our results are not at odds with the possibility that metallicity () gradients are steeper in the inner disk (R GC 7 12 kpc) and flatter towards the outer disk. The open cluster sample studied spans a significant range in age. When breaking the sample into age bins, there is some indication that the younger open cluster population in our sample (log age<8.7) has a flatter metallicity gradient when compared with the gradients obtained from older open clusters. 1 Introduction The chemical evolution of a galaxy depends on many global variables; some of the more important ones being the star formation history, the infall and outflow of gas, and the initial mass function. These variables may differ from one galaxy to another, change as the galaxy evolves, and, combined with the existence of more star formation in the center of the galaxy, can result, for example, in the overall radial decrease of the metallicity across the galactic disk (e.g. Chiappini 2002). Such metallicity gradients are commonly seen Corresponding author: kcunha@on.br in spiral galaxies and represent important observational constraints for models describing the formation and the chemical evolution of a galaxy (e.g., Minchev et al. 2014; Kubryk et al. 2015; Stanghellini et al. 2015). In the Milky Way, abundance gradients can be measured in a variety of populations, such as the young population of OB stars, H II regions and Cepheids; Planetary Nebulae; cool unevolved stars and red-giants in the field and in open clusters. The red giants which are members of open clusters, in particular, offer the advantage that their ages and distances can be better constrained than for field stars. In addition, open clusters span a large range of ages, from Myr

2 K. Cunha for the APOGEE collaboration: Metallicity Gradients from APOGEE Open clusters to Gyr, and can be used to gain insight into the time evolution of gradients in the Galactic disk. In this paper, we report on the radial abundance gradients of Fe and Ni, as well as the alpha-elements O, Mg, Si and Ca from open clusters observed by the Apache Point Observatory Galaxy Evolution Experiment, the APOGEE survey. DR12 - Literature 0 Jacobson et al. 2011(a,b) Bragaglia et al. 2001 Bragaglia et al. 2014 Carraro et al. 2006 Carraro et al. 2004 Fe DR12 - Lit = 36 ± 9 2 Apogee observations The APOGEE survey (Majewski et al. 2015) was one of the four surveys in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, SDSS- III. The APOGEE multi-object spectrograph collected data during bright time between 2011-2014 and observed over 150,000 red giants from all stellar populations in the Milky Way. The APOGEE spectra have a resolution R=λ/δλ 23,000 and spectral coverage between 1.5 1.7 micron. APOGEE targeted a large sample of stars in disk open clusters. These observations constitute the Open Cluster Chemical Analysis and Mapping (OCCAM) survey, a homogeneous and uniform dataset within the APOGEE survey that can be used to study abundance gradients. The sample discussed here contains 304 red-giants, which are members of 29 open clusters, covering galactocentric distances roughly between 7 23 kpc, but mostly concentrated between 8-15 kpc and with ages ranging from 200 Myr to 10 Gyr (Dias et al. 2002). A future paper describing the studied sample will be presented in Frinchaboy et al. (2016). 3 Results and discussion DR12 - Literature DR12 - Literature DR12 - Literature DR12 - Literature DR12 - Literature 0 0 0 0 0 Ni DR12 - Lit = -58 ± 7 Ca DR12 - Lit = -74 ± 7 Si DR12 - Lit = -43 ± 7 O DR12 - Lit = -04 ± 0.14 Mg DR12 - Lit = -0.137 ± 0.14 3.1 Abundances and comparisons with the literature The chemical abundances and metallicities of the individual stars in our sample were derived automatically by the APOGEE Stellar Parameters and Chemical Abundance Pipeline - ASPCAP (Garcia Perez et al. 2015); these are part of the most recent SDSS-III Data Release, DR12 1. Figure 1 shows comparisons of our average abundances for Fe, Ni, O, Ca, Si and Mg with results from other optical studies in the literature for the following clusters: NGC 6819 (Bragaglia et al. 2001); Berkeley 29 (Carraro et al. 2004); NGC 6791 (Carraro et al. 2006; Bragaglia et al. 2014); NGC 2243 (Jacobson et al. 2011a); NGC 2420, NGC 2158, NGC 7789, NGC 188 and M67 (Jacobson et al. 2011b). The mean differences between our results and the literature (<DR12 Literature>) and corresponding dispersions for each element are indicated in the panels. For all elements, except Mg, the mean offsets are smaller than 0.1 dex. Overall, the average iron abundances from DR12 and the literature agree within 0.1 dex. For two of the clusters, however, the derived metallicities are larger than those in Jacobson et al. (2011b) by 0.2 dex. The Ni, Ca and Si abundances for most of the clusters also agree with other studies within 0.1 dex, but with a tendency of being slightly 1 available at https://www.sdss.org/dr12/ 0.6 0.2 0.2 DR12 Fig. 1 A comparison of the ASPCAP/DR12 results with results from other optical high-resolution studies in the literature. The selected clusters are calibration clusters for the APOGEE survey (Mészáros et al. 2103). The abundance differences shown in the y axis are the average abundances per cluster and defined relative to the solar value as [el/fe] DR12 - [el/fe] Literature. Typical uncertainties in the DR12 abundance averages are ±5 dex (internal cluster abundance dispersions; Holtzman et al. 2015) and in the differences DR12 - Literature are estimated to be ±7 dex. lower in DR12 than in the literature. We note, however, that Carraro et al. (2006) find a higher Si abundance than ours for the very metal rich cluster NGC 6791. For oxygen, there are fewer open clusters for comparison, but our results agree with those in Jacobson et al. (2011b), while there is+0.2 dex offset with the oxygen abundance in Bragaglia et al. (2014) for NGC 6791, and an opposite offset of -0.2 dex for Be 29, when compared to Carraro et al. (2004). The DR12 Mg abundances are systematically lower than those in Jacobson et al. (2011a,b), but are slightly higher than in Bragaglia et al. (2001, 2014).

asna header will be provided by the publisher 3 The overall conclusion of the comparison above is that the DR12 abundances do not seem to show significant systematic offsets when compared to these literature studies. Certainly, the abundance differences found are typical of what is generally seen in other comparisons of different abundance studies in the literature. In addition, it is important to note that, since our goal is to investigate abundance gradients across the Galactic disk, it is an advantage to have observational data and abundance analysis methods which are homogenous, minimizing the posibility of having spurious trends that could be due to systematics. 3.2 Abundance gradients An initial assessment of the metallicity (iron) and overall [α/fe] abundance gradients from the APOGEE OCCAM survey has been presented in Frinchaboy et al. (2013). This previous study was based on abundances in SDSS-III Data Release 10 (DR10; Ahn et al. 2013). Other relevant studies of abundance gradients from open clusters in the literature include, e.g., Donati et al. (2015); Yong et al. (2012); Pancino et al. (2010); Magrini et al. (2015). Figure 2 summarizes our results and abundance gradients obtained for Fe and Ni (products of Type Ia SN) and the α-elements O, Ca, Si and Mg (products of Type II SN). In all panels of Figure 2 the green open triangles represent the average abundances obtained per open cluster. The typical internal abundance dispersions are <5 dex. The horizontal and vertical dashed lines indicate, respectively, the solar abundance values and the galactocentric distance of the Sun (R GC ). Overall, the abundance results for all elements, except Si, are roughly solar at close to solar galactocentric distances. In addition, the abundance scatter at roughly solar R GC is relatively small, but the open cluster NGC 6791 deviates from the average ([O/H] and [Mg/H] + dex; see also Cunha et al. 2015). The open cluster NGC 6791, however, is one of the most metal rich open clusters in the Galaxy and is known to have some special characteristics such as being very old, very massive, lying at 1 kpc from the galactic plane. As previously mentioned, for Si, our results are systematically higher than the solar Si abundance at roughly solar galactocentric distances. This would be an indication that our Si abundances are overestimated, but the comparison with the open clusters in Figure 1 indicates that our Si results are slightly lower than the literature. We note, however, that DR12 results for [Si/Fe] are systematically higher than the results in Bensby et al. (2014) by 0.1 dex. Concerning the abundance gradients, best fit slopes and uncertainties are also presented in Figure 2. These were computed from least squares fits to the cluster average elemental abundances. When considering the entire sample the gradients obtained for and [Ni/H] (mostly products of SN Type Ia) are -35± 07 dex kpc 1 and -40± 07 dex kpc 1, respectively, while the gradients for theαelements are slightly flatter with an average slope of -29 ± 04 dex kpc 1. Previous studies have found evidence for a possible break in the metallicity gradients at R GC 10 12 kpc (e.g., Frinchaboy et al. 2013, Yong et al. 2012; Magrini et al. 2010), with a flatter gradient in the outer disk when compared to the inner disk. When dividing our sample into clusters with R GC <12 kpc and those with R GC >12 kpc we also find that the metallicity gradient is flatter in the outer disk: -30±09 dex kpc 1, while for the inner disk (R GC 7 12 kpc) it is steeper: -68± 17 dex kpc 1. Radial metallicity gradients from field stars in the APOGEE survey with distances from the Galactic plane between 0<z<0.25 kpc, are found to be flat in the inner disk (R GC <6 kpc) and quite steep (-87± 02 dex kpc 1 ) between R GC 6 12 kpc, with a significant abundance scatter (Hayden et al. 2014). In the overlapping region from R GC 7 12 kpc, the metallicity gradient obtained for the cluster sample (-68 ± 17) is somewhat flatter than for the field stars based on DR10 results (these results should be revisited using DR12). We note, however, that the most distant cluster, Be 29, has z=2 kpc and its metallicity is in line with the median metallicity found by Hayden et al. (2014) for their sample of field stars with 1.00<z<2.00 kpc. (See also Cheng et al. 2012; Boeche et al. 2014) The open clusters in our sample have considerable age spread ( 200 Myr 10 Gyr) and it is possible that the derived metallicity gradient, which was obtained from open clusters of all ages, carries also the signature of its evolution as the Galaxy evolves. In addition, there is also the effect of radial migration. In order to investigate the possible time evolution of metallicity gradients, we break our open cluster sample into three arbitrary age bins. The top and middle panels of Figure 3 show, respectively, the young (log age< 8.7) and intermediate age (8.7<log age<9.0) clusters, and the bottom panel shows the oldest clusters, with ages over 1 Gyr. The latter includes the only open cluster in our sample beyond R GC 16 kpc (Be 29). Best fit slopes are: -25 ± 17 and -37±18 for the young and intermediate age populations, respectively. For the oldest clusters, we derive a steeper gradient of -49 ± 17 when considering the range R GC 7 16 kpc, which is covered in all 3 age bins and flatter when including Be 29 (-36±10). These preliminary results indicate that the radial metallicity gradients are flatter for the younger open clusters. Acknowledgements. PMF, BT, and JO are supported by NSF AST- 1311835. Funding for SDSS-III has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Science Foundation, and the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science. The SDSS-III web site is http://www.sdss3.org/. SDSS-III is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for the Participating Institutions of the SDSS-III Collaboration including the Univ. of Arizona, the Brazilian Participation Group, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Carnegie Mellon University, University of Florida, the French Participation Group, the German Participation Group, Harvard University, the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, the Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group, Johns Hopkins University, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, New Mexico State University, New York University, Ohio State University, Pennsylvania State Uni-

4 K. Cunha for the APOGEE collaboration: Metallicity Gradients from APOGEE Open clusters versity, University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the Spanish Participation Group, University of Tokyo, University of Utah, Vanderbilt University, University of Virginia,University of Washington, and Yale University. References Ahn, C. P., Alexandroff, R., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2014, ApJS, 211, 17 Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., & Oey, M. S. 2014, A&A, 562, A71 Boeche, C., Siebert, A., Piffl, T. et al. 2014, A&A, 568, A71 Bragaglia, A., Carretta, E., Gratton, R. G., et al. 2001, AJ, 121, 327 Bragaglia, A., Sneden, C., Carretta, E. et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 68 Carraro, G., Bresolin, F., Villanova, S., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 1676 Carraro, G., Villanova, S., Demarque, P., et al. 2006, ApJ, 643, 1151 Cheng, J., Rockosi, C. M., Morrison, H. L., et al. 2012, ApJ, 746, 149 Chiappini, C. 2002, Ap&SS, 281, 253 Cunha, K., Smith, V. V., Johnson, J. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, L41 Frinchaboy, P. M., Thompson, B., Jackson, K. M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, L1 Frinchaboy, P. M. et al. 2016, in preparation Garcia Perez, A. E., Allende Prieto, C., Holtzman, J. A., et al. 2015, preprint, arxiv:1517635 Hayden, M. R., Holtzman, J. A., Bovy, J., et al. 2014, AJ, 147, 116 Holtzman, J. A., Shetrone, M., Allende Prieto, C., Y., et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 148 Jacobson, H. R., Friel, E. D., & Pilachowski, C. A. 2011a, AJ, 141, 58 Jacobson, H. R., Pilachowski, C. A., & Friel, E. D. 2011b, AJ, 142, 59 Kubryk, M., Prantzos, N., Athanassoula, E. 2015, A&A, 580, 126 Magrini, L., Randich, S., Zoccali, M. et al. 2010, A&A, 523, 11 Magrini, L., Randich, S., Donati, A. 2015, A&A, 580, 85 Majewski, S. R., Schiavon, R. P., Frinchaboy, P. M., et al. 2015, preprint, arxiv:1509.05420 Meszaros, Sz., Holtzman, J., Garcia Perez, A.E., et al. 2013, AJ, 146, 133 Minchev, I., Chiappini, C., & Martig, M. 2014, A&A, 572, 19 Pancino, E.; Carrera, R.; Rossetti, E.; Gallart, C. 2010, A&A, 511, 19 Stanghellini, L., Magrini, L. & Casasola, V. 2015, ApJ, 812, 39 Yong, D., Carney, B. W., Friel, E. D. 2012, AJ, 144, 95 [Ni/H] [Ca/H] [Si/H] [O/H] [Mg/H] R (GC) -35 ± 07 dex kpc 1-40 ± 07 dex kpc 1-26 ± 07 dex kpc 1-33 ± 08 dex kpc 1-26 ± 07 dex kpc 1-32 ± 07 dex kpc 1 R GC (kpc) Fig. 2 Chemical Abundance gradients (best fit slopes) for a sample of open clusters observed by the APOGEE survey. The triangles represent average abundances for each cluster computed from individual stellar abundances from cluster members in SDSS-III/ DR12. The galactocentric distances adopted for the open clusters are from the Dias et al. (2002) catalog.

asna header will be provided by the publisher 5-25 ± 17 dex kpc 1 log (age) < 8.7-37 ± 18 dex kpc 1 8.7 < log (age) < 9.0-49 ± 17 dex kpc 1 log (age) > 9.0 R GC (kpc) Fig. 3 The time evolution of gradients for the studied sample. The open clusters in our sample are divided in 3 age bins: log age<8.7; 8.7<log age<9.0 and log age> 9.0. The best fit slope for the old population did not include Be 29 (filled triangle). The derived gradients are flatter for the youngest populations.