Kirillov Theory. TCU GAGA Seminar. Ruth Gornet. January University of Texas at Arlington

Similar documents
LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

A simple proof of the existence of sampling spaces with the interpolation property on the Heisenberg group

Group Theory - QMII 2017

REPRESENTATIONS OF U(N) CLASSIFICATION BY HIGHEST WEIGHTS NOTES FOR MATH 261, FALL 2001

1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups

Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

Intertwining integrals on completely solvable Lie groups

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

KIRILLOV THEORY AND ITS APPLICATIONS

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

Lecture 4 - The Basic Examples of Collapse

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

Introduction to Selberg Trace Formula.

Left-invariant Einstein metrics

8. COMPACT LIE GROUPS AND REPRESENTATIONS

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7.

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

The Cartan Decomposition of a Complex Semisimple Lie Algebra

U = 1 b. We fix the identification G a (F ) U sending b to ( 1 b

Introduction to Representations Theory of Lie Groups

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Weights

ON NEARLY SEMIFREE CIRCLE ACTIONS

1: Lie groups Matix groups, Lie algebras

Quantum Mechanics for Mathematicians: The Heisenberg group and the Schrödinger Representation

Symmetric Spaces Toolkit

Representations of moderate growth Paul Garrett 1. Constructing norms on groups

Lecture 22 - F 4. April 19, The Weyl dimension formula gives the following dimensions of the fundamental representations:

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

Peter Hochs. Strings JC, 11 June, C -algebras and K-theory. Peter Hochs. Introduction. C -algebras. Group. C -algebras.

A CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSVERSE SUBMANIFOLDS

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.

Notation. For any Lie group G, we set G 0 to be the connected component of the identity.

Since G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

A little taste of symplectic geometry

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)

Quantum Theory and Group Representations

Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.

The local geometry of compact homogeneous Lorentz spaces

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Complex Structures

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

Isodiametric problem in Carnot groups

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

Discrete Series Representations of Unipotent p-adic Groups

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles

Solutions to Example Sheet 1

These notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly.

Representations of Matrix Lie Algebras

7. Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula

1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction.

Fermionic coherent states in infinite dimensions

Lectures on the Orbit Method

Curtis Heberle MTH 189 Final Paper 12/14/2010. Algebraic Groups

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 1.

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY

A FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF INVARIANT METRICS ON A HOMOGENEOUS SPACE. 1. Introduction

CHAPTER 6. Representations of compact groups

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

Representations Are Everywhere

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007

Math 210C. The representation ring

VINCENT PECASTAING. University of Luxembourg, Mathematics Research Unit Maison du nombre, 6 avenue de la Fonte L-4364 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg 1

Cartan s Criteria. Math 649, Dan Barbasch. February 26

Ergodic Rotations of Nilmanifolds Conjugate to Their Inverses

Weeks 6 and 7. November 24, 2013

H(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) = C c (SL n (Z p )\ SL n (Q p )/ SL n (Z p )).

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 30 Aug 2018

X-RAY TRANSFORM ON DAMEK-RICCI SPACES. (Communicated by Jan Boman)

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

Representations of a semi-direct product hypergroup

Bredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, Academic Press

MAXIMALLY NON INTEGRABLE PLANE FIELDS ON THURSTON GEOMETRIES

Shannon-Like Wavelet Frames on a Class of Nilpotent Lie Groups

The Morozov-Jacobson Theorem on 3-dimensional Simple Lie Subalgebras

THE THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT

An introduction to the geometry of homogeneous spaces

ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES

Introduction to Group Theory

AUTOMORPHIC FORMS NOTES, PART I

A PIERI RULE FOR HERMITIAN SYMMETRIC PAIRS. Thomas J. Enright, Markus Hunziker and Nolan R. Wallach

Physics 557 Lecture 5

12 Geometric quantization

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

14 From modular forms to automorphic representations

Representation Theory

Killing Vector Fields of Constant Length on Riemannian Normal Homogeneous Spaces

The following definition is fundamental.

Problems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory

Lecture 11 The Radical and Semisimple Lie Algebras

Representation Theory and Orbital Varieties. Thomas Pietraho Bowdoin College

MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS

Symmetric Spaces. Andrew Fiori. Sept McGill University

THE HARISH-CHANDRA ISOMORPHISM FOR sl(2, C)

Introduction to Index Theory. Elmar Schrohe Institut für Analysis

1 Classifying Unitary Representations: A 1

REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE: EXERCISES. Notation. 1. GL n

von Neumann algebras, II 1 factors, and their subfactors V.S. Sunder (IMSc, Chennai)

Transcription:

TCU GAGA Seminar University of Texas at Arlington January 2009

A representation of a Lie group G on a Hilbert space H is a homomorphism such that v H the map is continuous. π : G Aut(H) = GL(H) x π(x)v If π(x) is unitary (ie, inner-product preserving) for all x G, then π is a unitary representation Note that a subspace of H will always refer to a closed subspace of H.

A subspace W H is G-invariant iff x G, π(x)(w) W. A representation (π, H) is irreducible iff {0} and H are the only G-invariant subspaces of H. A representation (π, H) is completely reducible iff H is a(n orthogonal) direct sum of irreducible subspaces. Two (unitary) representations (π, H) and (π, H ) are (unitarily) equivalent iff (unitary) isomorphism T : H H such that x G v H, T (π(x)v) = π (x)(tv) ie, T π = π T. The mapping T is called the intertwining operator.

A Lie algebra g is nilpotent iff [g, [g, [g, g]]] [g, [g, g]] [g, g] g eventually ends. A Lie group G is nilpotent iff its Lie algebra is. For any Lie algebra g, there is a unique simply connected Lie group G with Lie algebra g. Example: The Heisenberg Lie algebra h = span{x, Y, Z} with Lie bracket [X, Y ] = Z and all other basis brackets not determined by skew-symmetry zero. Then [h, h] = span{z}, and [h, [h, h]] = {0}, so h is two-step nilpotent.

Every simply-connected nilpotent Lie group is diffeomorphic to R n The Lie group exponential exp : g G is a diffeomorphism that induces a coordinate system on any such G. We denote the inverse of exp by log.

Example: if we use the matrix coordinates given above, which are not the exponential coordinates, then the Lie group exponential is given by where Note that We then have log exp(xx + yy + zz) = e A, A = e A = 1 x z 0 1 y 0 0 1 0 x z 0 0 y 0 0 0 1 x z + 1 2 xy 0 1 y 0 0 1 = xx + yy 1 2 xyz

The co-adjoint action of G on g (= dual of g) is given by x λ = λ Ad(x 1 ) (We need the inverse to make it an action.) Group actions induce equivalence relations = partitions So, g can be partitioned into coadjoint orbits Note that as sets λ Ad(G 1 ) = λ Ad(G), so we drop the inverse when computing an entire orbit.

Example: The co-adjoint action of the Heisenberg group. Let {α, β, ζ} be the basis of h dual to {X, Y, Z} Let λ h. Note that for x H and U h, Ad(x)(U) = d dt 0x exp(tu)x 1 = U + [log x, U] Case 1: If λ(z) = 0, then λ Ad(x) = λ, x H Case 2: If λ(z) 0, then let λ = aα + bβ + cζ. Let x = 1 b/c 0 1 a/c 0 0 1 Note that log x = b c X + a c Y + Z Claim: λ Ad(x) = cζ. Assuming this is true for the moment, this means that the coadjoint orbit of an element in this case is completely determined by its value at Z.

The computation: (λ Ad(x))(X ) = λ(x +[log x, X ]) = λ(x +[ b c X + a Y + Z, X ]) c Likewise = λ(x ) a λ(z) = 0 = cζ(0) c (λ Ad(x))(Y ) = λ(y +[log x, Y ]) = λ(y +[ b c X + a Y + Z, Y ]) c Finally, = λ(y ) b λ(z) = 0 = cζ(0) c (λ Ad(x))(Z) = λ(z + [log x, Z]) = λ(z) = c = cζ(z)

of Unitary Representations Let G be a simply connected nilpotent Lie group Let Ĝ denote the equivalence classes of irreducible unitary representations of G. : Ĝ corresponds to the co-adjoint orbits of g (i) λ g irred unitary rep π λ of G that is unique up to unitary equivalence of reps (ii) π Ĝ λ g, π π λ (iii) π λ π µ iff µ = λ Ad(x) for some x G

Let λ g A subalgebra k g is subordinate to λ iff λ([k, k]) = 0. Let K = exp(k), the simply connected Lie subgroup of G with Lie algebra k. We also say K is subordinate to λ. If k is maximal with respect to being subordinate, then k (or K) is a polarization of λ, or a maximal subordinate subalgebra for λ Define a character(= 1-dim l rep) of K = exp(k) by This is a homomorphism. λ(k) = e 2πiλ log k C.

Why is this a homomorphism? λ(k) = e 2πiλ log k C. Recall the Campbell-Baker-Hausdorff formula: exp(a) exp(b) = exp(a+b+ 1 [A, B]+higher powers of bracket). 2 So λ(k 1 k 2 ) = e 2πiλ(log k 1+log k 2 + 1 2 [log k 1,log k 2 ]+ ) = e 2πiλ(log k 1) e 2πiλ(log k 2) since λ([k, k]) = 0.

Example: Consider the Heisenberg group and algebra. Let λ h. If λ(z) = 0, then the polarization k = h. That is, λ([h, h]) = 0. If λ(z) 0, let k = span{y, Z}. Then k is abelian, so λ([k, k]) = 0. This is a polarization, ie, maximal. There are other polarizations. They are not unique. So then for all (0, y, z) H (with the obvious correspondence between coordinates) λ((0, y, z)) = e 2πiλ(yY +zz).

The representation π λ of is defined as the representation of G induced by the representation λ of K. What the heck is an induced representation?

Inducing Representations Let G be a Lie group with closed Lie subgroup K. Let (π, H) be a unitary rep of H. Define the representation space of the induced rep W := {f : G H : f (kx) = π(k)(f (x)) k K, x G}. We also require that f L 2 (K\G, µ). Note that π(k) is unitary. So f (kx) = π(k)f (x) = f (x), so f induces a well-defined map from K\G to R. Can put a right G-invariant measure µ on K\G. W is a Hilbert space Define a rep π of G on W by ( π(a)f )(x) = f (xa). π is a unitary rep of G, the unitary rep induced by the unitary rep π of K G.

Recall: we have λ g, a polarization k of λ and a character λ(k) = e 2πiλ(log k) of exp(k). The representation space of π λ is then W = {f : G C : f (kx) = e 2πiλ log k f (x) k K}. G acts by right translation on W Kirillov showed that π λ is unitary and irreducible

Example: The Heisenberg group and algebra. Let λ h. Case 1: λ(z) = 0, = K = H. Then λ is a character of H that is independent of Z, λ(x, y, z) = e 2πiλ(xX +yy ). The induced rep π λ is unitarily equivalent to λ. To see this, note that the representation space W is defined as W = {f : H C : f (hx) = e 2πiλ log h f (x) h H x H}. Letting x = e W = {f : H C : f (h) = e 2πiλ log h f (e) h H} = C λ

Case 2: λ(z) 0 = K = (0, y, z) λ((0, y, z)) = e 2πiλ(yY +zz) So that W = {f : H C : f (kx) = f (x) k K} (x, y, z) = (0, y, z)(x, 0, 0), so f (x, y, z) = f ((0, y, z)(x, 0, 0)) = e 2πiλ(yY +zz) f (x, 0, 0). note that we can choose λ = cζ This is equivalent to an action on W = {f : R C} What does this action look like. H acts on W by right multiplication, so (π λ ((x, y, z))f )(u) = e2πic(z+py) f (u + x).

Let Γ G be a cocompact, discrete subgroup of G. Example: Recall that the Heisenberg group can be realized as the set of matrices 1 x z H = 0 1 y : x, y, z R 0 0 1 A cocompact (ie, Γ\G compact) discrete subgroup of H is given by 1 x z 0 1 y : x, y, z Z 0 0 1 (The existence of a cocompact, discrete subgroup places some restrictions on g, and it also implies that G is unimodular.)

The right action ρ of G on L 2 (G) is a representation of G on H = L 2 (G) : (ρ(a)f )(x) = f (xa) a G, x G The quasi-regular representation ρ Γ of G on H = L 2 (Γ\G) is given by (ρ Γ (a)f )(x) = f (xa) a G, x Γ\G We generally view functions f L 2 (Γ\G) as left-γ invariant functions on G, ie f (γx) = f (x) γ Γ x G Both ρ and ρ Γ are unitary.

Of interest to spectral geometry is determining the decomposition of the quasi-regular representation ρ Γ of G on L 2 (Γ\G). To see why, we consider left invariant metrics on the Lie group G A left invariant metric on G corresponds to a choice of inner product, on g.

Let f C (M) Recall that ( f )(p) = j ((E j (p) 2 + Ej (p)e j (p))f )(p) Claim: On Γ\G, with Riemannian metric induced from, on g, = j E j 2, where {E 1,..., E n } is an ONB of g. From the standard proof of uniqueness of the Levi-Civita connection 2 X Y, W = X Y, W + Y X, W W X, Y + [X, Y ], W + [W, X ], Y [Y, W ], X But if X, Y, W are left-invariant, then X Y, W = 1 ( [X, Y ], W + [W, X ], Y [Y, W ], X ) 2

Claim: j E j E j = 0 Proof: j E j E j, U = j Ej E j, U = 1 2 j [U, E j], E j ] + [U, E j ], E j ] + [E j, E j ], U] = j ad(u)e j, E j = tr(adu). Since G is unimodular, tr(adu) = 0 for all U g. See, eg, the Springer Encyclopedia of Mathematics (online) entry on unimodular.

A representation π of a Lie algebra g on a Hilbert space H is a linear map π : g End R (H) such that π([x, Y ]) = [π(x ), π(y )] Let (π, H) be a representation of G. Define H π = {v H : x π(x)v is smooth}, the smooth vectors of H with respect to π. H π is G-invariant and dense

The derived representation π of g associated to the representation (π, H) of G is defined as, for X g π (X )v = d dt 0π(exp(tX ))v, where π (X ) : Hπ Hπ If (π, H) and (π, H ) are unitarily equivalent, so are their derived representations.

If E g, then Let f C (Γ\G), then E(x) = d ds 0x exp(se). Ef (x) = d ds 0f (x exp(se)) = d ds 0ρ Γ (exp(se)f )(x) = (ρ Γ (E)f )(x) So we extend to H by f = j ρ Γ (E j ) 2

Kirillov theory says that L 2 (Γ\G) can be decomposed into the orthogonal sum of various π λ, for λ g, each π λ occuring with finite multiplicity. We seek a condition that says when π λ occurs, and with what multiplicity.

A rational Lie algebra is a Lie algebra defined over Q rather than R. If we take g Q R, we obtain a real Lie algebra. A choice of cocompact, discrete subgroup of G determines a rational structure. In particular, the existence of Γ implies that we can pick a basis of g from the set log Γ, which implies that the structure constants are rational on this basis. Then g Γ = span Q {log Γ} is a rational Lie algebra. A subalgebra k g is a rational Lie subalgebra iff there exists subalgebra k Q g Γ such that k = k Q R. That is, there exists a basis of k contained in g Γ.

If k is a rational subalgebra of g (with respect to Γ), then Γ exp(k) is a cocompact, discrete subgroup of K = exp(k). To obtain a multiplicity formula, we must consider λ g that have rational polarizations, and such that λ(γ exp(k)) = 1. Thus λ is really a mapping on Γ K\K. We call the pair ( λ, k) and integral point iff k is rational (with respect to the rational structure induced by Γ) and λ(γ exp(k)) = 1.

Consider the set F = all pairs ( λ, k) where λ is the character of exp(k) determined by λ g, and k is a polarization of λ. G acts by conjugation on F : for all x G. x ( λ, k) = ( λ I x, Ad(x x )(k)), Fact: If ( λ, k) F, then x ( λ, k) F. The isotropy subgroup of the point ( λ, k) is exp(k). Fact: Γ maps integral points of F to integral points of F

Theorem: (L Richardson and R. Howe) Let λ g and let ( λ, k) induce π λ. Then π λ occurs in the rep ρ Γ of G on L 2 (Γ\G) iff the G-orbit of ( λ, k) contains an integral point. The multiplicity of π λ is equal to the number of Γ-orbits on the set of integral points in the G-orbit of ( λ, k). Restated: m(π λ, ρ Γ ) = # {Γ\λ(Ad(G)) Γ }, where λ(ad(g)) Γ is the set of integral points of the co-adjoint action of G.