Revealing powerful outflows in z~1.5 obscured QSOs

Similar documents
Obscured QSOs in the golden epoch of AGN-galaxy evolution placing objects in the mergers sequence (with NIR and mm observations)

Starburst-AGN connection: a mutual relation?

Observing the Formation of Dense Stellar Nuclei at Low and High Redshift (?) Roderik Overzier Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics

Luminous radio-loud AGN: triggering and (positive?) feedback

PROBING THE AGN/GALAXY CO-EVOLUTION AT ITS EXTREME

AGN feedback and the connection to triggering

Chien-Ting Chen! Dartmouth College

AGN/Galaxy Co-Evolution. Fabio Fontanot (HITS) AGN10 11/09/12

Studying Merger Driven BH Growth with Observations of Dual AGN

Quasar Feedback in Galaxies

What s the fuss about AGN?

The quest for Type 2 quasars: What are the X-ray observations of optically selected QSOs2 telling us?

Feeding the Beast. Chris Impey (University of Arizona)

AGN/Galaxy Co-Evolution. Fabio Fontanot (HITS)

The symbiotic nature of AGN and SF activities of AGNs probed by the PAH 3.3 micron emission feature

Co-evolution of galaxies and black holes?

The search for. COSMOS and CDFS. Marcella Brusa

Multiwavelength signatures of AGN feedback in local AGN

Exploring the Origin of the BH Mass Scaling Relations

AGN feedback. Nadia Zakamska & Rachael Alexandroff Johns Hopkins University

Astrophysics of feedback in local AGN and starbursts

Gemini IFU Observations of Feedback from Radio-Quiet Quasars at z~0.5

Local Scaling Relations of Super-Massive Black Holes: Origin, Evolution, Consequences FRANCESCO SHANKAR

Luminous Quasars and AGN Surveys with ELTs

A Supermassive Black Hole in the Dwarf Starburst Galaxy Henize Amy Reines Einstein Fellow National Radio Astronomy Observatory

AGN winds and outflows

Evidence for AGN impact on star formation in (unresolved) galaxy populations

- AGN feedback in action?

BAT AGN prefer circumnuclear star formation

Shedding light on hyperluminous quasars at the golden epoch of AGN/galaxy coevolu<on

Connection between AGN and Star Formation activities, or not?

A galaxy without its SMBH: implications for feedback

PoS(SWIFT 10)153. SWIFT/BAT AGN2 reveal broad emission lines in the NIR: the first virial measure of their black hole masses

Demographics of radio galaxies nearby and at z~0.55. Are radio galaxies signposts to black-hole mergers?

Unhidden monsters: Are unobscured quasars the late stages of obscured quasar activity?

The Rela(on Between Bars and AGN locally and at high redshi8

ISM and Galaxy Evolution the ELT View Alvio Renzini, INAF Padova

Multi-wavelength Surveys for AGN & AGN Variability. Vicki Sarajedini University of Florida

Compton-thick AGN. SWIFT/BAT 70 month survey (+ CDFS 7Ms + models) I. Georgantopoulos National Observatory of Athens

The Illustris simulation: a new look at galaxy black hole co-evolution. Debora Sijacki IoA & KICC Cambridge

Galaxy Activity in Semi Analytical Models. Fabio Fontanot (INAF OATs) Ljubljana 05/04/11

Towards a Complete Census of Extreme Starbursts in the Early Universe

The physical state of radio-mode, low- luminosity AGN

The Monster Roars: AGN Feedback & Co-Evolution with Galaxies

The quest for early Black Holes

Virial M BH of AGN2 with deep NIR spectroscopy and the measure of the local M BH L 3.6,bul relation

Radio Quiet AGN: Black Hole & Host Galaxy Proper;es

Astro2010 Science White Paper: Tracing the Mass Buildup of Supermassive Black Holes and their Host Galaxies

Feedback and Galaxy Formation

The Phenomenon of Active Galactic Nuclei: an Introduction

Quasars, Mergers, and Spheroid Evolution

Major questions in postgalaxy merger evolution

AGN feedback in action: constraints on the scaling relations between BH and galaxy at high redshift

The cosmic X ray background: abundance and evolu8on of hidden black holes. R. Gilli (INAF OaBologna) with the XMM CDFS, 4Ms CDFS, COSMOS, WFXT teams

Paul Sell. University of Wisconsin-Madison Advisor: Christy Tremonti

THE XMM-NEWTON AND SPITZER VIEW OF GALAXY/AGN FORMATION AT. F.J. Carrera, J. Ebrero 1, M.J. Page 2, and J.A. Stevens 3

Massive Neutral and Molecular Winds in Nearby Galaxies

Active Galactic Nuclei SEDs as a function of type and luminosity

Black Hole Feedback. What is it? What does it do? Richard Bower Durham University

AGN Feedback In an Isolated Elliptical Galaxy

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ga] 15 Nov 2014

Caitlin Casey, Jacqueline Hodge, Mark Lacy

Obscured AGN. I. Georgantopoulos National Observatory of Athens

The Impact of Quasar Feedback on the Formation & Evolution of Red Galaxies

The Chandra COSMOS X-ray Survey

Orianne ROOS CEA-Saclay Collaborators : F. Bournaud, J. Gabor, S. Juneau

Black Holes and Galaxy Formation. Karl Gebhardt (UT Austin)

Relazioni di scala tra Buchi Neri e Galassie Ospiti. Lezione 7

Hard X-ray selected sample of AGN: population studies

X RAY EMITTING EROS AS TRACERS OF BLACK HOLES-GALAXIES COEVOLUTION

Galaxy Evolution at High Redshift: The Future Remains Obscure. Mark Dickinson (NOAO)

Observational evidence for AGN feedback throughout the cosmic epochs. Roberto Maiolino

The Connection between Major Galaxy Mergers, Black Hole Growth and Galaxy Evolution from Multiwavelength Observations Ezequiel Treister

Quasars, Feedback, and Galaxy Interactions

A Herschel view on star formation in high

Quick report of the project 123 (submm follow-up)

NEW CONSTRAINTS ON THE BLACK HOLE SPIN IN RADIO LOUD QUASARS

Active Galactic Nuclei research with SOAR: present and upcoming capabilities

Dusty Quasars in a Teenage Universe

The Physics, Observational Signatures, and Consequences of AGN-Driven Galactic Winds

Active Galactic Nuclei in the infrared: identification, energetic and properties of the obscuring material

ALMA Synergy with ATHENA

Active Galaxies & Emission Line Diagnostics

Black Holes and Active Galactic Nuclei

Empirical Evidence for AGN Feedback

TEMA 3. Host Galaxies & Environment

The Merger-Driven Star Formation History of the Universe

The Zoo of AGN in the clustering context: quasar clustering and what it tells or Galaxy formation is Messi, but we have Gotze Klose

Understanding Submillimetre Galaxies: Lessons from Low Redshifts

Quasars, Feedback, and Galaxy Formation

The parsec scale of. ac-ve galac-c nuclei. Mar Mezcua. International Max Planck Research School for Astronomy and Astrophysics

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 24 Oct 2017

AGN-driven turbulence revealed by extreme [CII]158µm line cooling in radio-galaxies

Outflows in local ULIRGS: [CII] 158 Broad Components and OH outflows

Radio Properties Of X-Ray Selected AGN

A Monster at any other Epoch:

Measuring star formation in galaxies and its evolution. Andrew Hopkins Australian Astronomical Observatory

The bolometric output of AGN in the XMM-COSMOS survey

Galaxies Across Cosmic Time

The Hot and Energetic Universe

Transcription:

Revealing powerful outflows in z~1.5 obscured QSOs Marcella Brusa 1) Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia / Universita di Bologna 2) Max-Planck Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik / Garching, Germany (major) credits: A. Bongiorno, G. Cresci, F. La Franca, R. Maiolino, M. Mignoli Black Hole (g)astronomy - Brindisi - 2-6 September 2013

AGN-galaxy coevolution paths MERGERS SCENARIO: (last decade paradigm) Major mergers can trigger SF and BH activity (e.g. Silk & Rees 1998, Granato et al. 2004, Di Matteo et al. 2005, Croton et al. 2006, Fontanot et al. 2006, De Lucia et al. 2006, Sijacki et al. 2007, Menci et al. 2008, Hopkins et al. 2008, Marulli et al. 2009) strong correlation between M BH and bulge properties (e.g. Ferrarese & Merritt 2000, Gebhardt et al. 2000, Gultekin et al. 2009) Alexander & Hickox 2012 SECULAR SCENARIO: (this decade novelty) (weak) activity driven stochastically by local processes (inflow, disks/bars instabilities; Croton+2006, Ciotti&Ostriker 2007, Cen 2011, Dekel+2008, Bournaud+2011, Di Matteo+2011) no correlation between M BH and disk or pseudobulge properties (Kormendy et al. 2011; see also Graham et al. 2010) QSO-ULIRGS-mergers connection (e.g. Sanders et al. 1988) (see also Bellovary talk) A population of galaxies evolved without mergers does clearly exist (disks are observed at z~2; e.g. Genzel +2006, 2008) also in AGN hosts (Cisternas+2011, Kocevski +2012)

AGN-galaxy coevolution paths MERGERS SCENARIO: (last decade paradigm) Major mergers can trigger SF and BH activity (e.g. Silk & Rees 1998, Granato et al. 2004, Di Matteo et al. 2005, Croton et al. 2006, Fontanot et al. 2006, De Lucia et al. 2006, Sijacki et al. 2007, Menci et al. 2008, Hopkins et al. 2008, Marulli et al. 2009) High luminosity strong correlation between M BH and bulge minority properties (e.g. Ferrarese & Merritt 2000, Gebhardt et al. 2000, Gultekin et al. 2009) Alexander & Hickox 2012 SECULAR SCENARIO: (this decade novelty) (weak) activity driven stochastically by local processes (inflow, disks/bars instabilities; Croton+2006, Ciotti&Ostriker 2007, Cen 2011, Dekel+2008, Bournaud+2011, Di Matteo+2011) Low luminosity no correlation between M BH and disk majority pseudobulge properties (Kormendy et al. 2011; see also Graham et al. 2010) QSO-ULIRGS-mergers connection (e.g. Sanders et al. 1988) Feedback! Feedback? (see also Bellovary talk) A population of galaxies evolved without mergers does clearly exist (disks are observed at z~2; e.g. Genzel +2006, 2008) also in AGN hosts (Cisternas+2011, Kocevski +2012)

evidences for (AGN) feedback at z>1 INDIRECT Harrison+2012a SFR vs. Lx CDFN/CDFS/COSMOS (see also Page+2012, Rosario+2012) (see Maiolino review) DIRECT Harrison+2012b ionized outflows / integrated NIR spectra ([OIII] broad and shifted wings) see also molecular outflows (e.g. Feruglio+10) MORE DIRECT Cano-DIaz+2012, Alexander+2010, Maiolino+2012 spatially resolved IR spectroscopy estimate spatial scale (distance!) to get energy

[OIII] FWHM as tracers of outflows/gas broad distribution of [OIII] width vs. total luminosity in SDSS Syeferts (Mullaney+2013) - Gas is kinematically disturbed - SDSS broadest profile in highest L/LEdd sources dynamics

[OIII] FWHM as tracers of outflows/gas broad distribution of [OIII] width vs. total luminosity in SDSS Syeferts (Mullaney+2013) - Gas is kinematically disturbed - SDSS broadest profile in highest L/LEdd sources dynamics Higher incidence of broad components in Sey-ULIRGs wrt non-sey ULIRGs (Rodriguez-Zaurin et al. 2013)

[OIII] FWHM as tracers of outflows/gas broad distribution of [OIII] width vs. total luminosity in SDSS Syeferts (Mullaney+2013) - Gas is kinematically disturbed - SDSS broadest profile in highest L/LEdd sources dynamics Higher incidence of broad components in Sey-ULIRGs wrt non-sey ULIRGs (Rodriguez-Zaurin et al. 2013) Large [OIII] FWHM in high-z luminous and very luminous ULIRGs/QSO (Harrison et al. 2012 compilation)

High-z: biases on the selection? most of previous studies are on preselected radio and/or SMG - ULIRGs systems and/or serendipitous, generally z>2 Kinetic vs. radiative feedback vs. SN feedback Alexander et al. 2010, Harrison et al. 2012 (SMG / ULIRGS) Nesvadba et al. 2006, 2008, 2011 (radio galaxies) Cano-Diaz et al. 2012 (ULIRG)

Finding the sweet spot for feedback Hopkins et al. 2008 (see also Lamastra+2013) Narayanan et al. 2010 Lbol=45.5 MERGERS MODEL PREDICTIONS/IMPLICATIONS: 1) blow-out/feedback phase very short (<~ 100 Myr) - RARE! 2) BH growth and SF almost simultaneous 3) blow-out/feedback phase X-ray obscured (torus+host ISM) 4) blow-out/feedback phase IR bright

Finding the sweet spot for feedback Hopkins et al. 2008 (see also Lamastra+2013) Narayanan et al. 2010 AGN in FEEDBACK: X-ray luminous, obscured and dusty Lbol=45.5 MERGERS MODEL PREDICTIONS/IMPLICATIONS: 1) blow-out/feedback phase very short (<~ 100 Myr) - RARE! 2) BH growth and SF almost simultaneous 3) blow-out/feedback phase X-ray obscured (torus+host ISM) 4) blow-out/feedback phase IR bright

HOW to efficiently select QSO in feedback phase Use correlations between observables (X/O, R-K, HR, luminosities) for the identified samples to isolate obscured AGN XMM-COSMOS 2-10 kev (~1000 objects) FULL XMM-COSMOS sample (~1800 objects) Brusa et al. 2010

HOW to efficiently select QSO in feedback phase Use correlations between observables (X/O, R-K, HR, luminosities) for the identified samples to isolate obscured AGN Most efficient selection to pick up obscured QSO using only 3 bands! ~100 objects vs. ~1000 (~10%) XMM-COSMOS 2-10 kev (~1000 objects) FULL XMM-COSMOS sample (~1800 objects) Brusa et al. 2010

HOW to efficiently select QSO in feedback phase Use correlations between observables (X/O, R-K, HR, luminosities) for the identified samples to isolate obscured AGN Most efficient selection to pick up obscured QSO using only 3 bands! ~100 objects vs. ~1000 (~10%) XMM-COSMOS 2-10 kev (~1000 objects) FULL XMM-COSMOS sample (~1800 objects) Brusa et al. 2010

HOW to efficiently select QSO in feedback phase Use correlations between observables (X/O, R-K, HR, luminosities) for the identified samples to isolate obscured AGN Most efficient selection to pick up obscured QSO using only 3 bands! ~100 objects vs. ~1000 (~10%) XMM-COSMOS 2-10 kev (~1000 objects) FULL XMM-COSMOS sample (~1800 objects) Brusa et al. 2010

HOW to efficiently select QSO in feedback phase Use correlations between observables (X/O, R-K, HR, luminosities) for the identified samples to isolate obscured AGN Most efficient selection to pick up obscured QSO using only 3 bands! ~100 objects vs. ~1000 (~10%) XMM-COSMOS 2-10 kev (~1000 objects) FULL XMM-COSMOS sample (~1800 objects) Brusa et al. 2010 10 X-ray and IR brightest objects observed with Xshooter

X-shooter NIR spectra Brusa et al, in prep 3 nights in February 2013 10 targets goals: 1) measure redshifts for only photoz (6/10) 2) measure BH mass from broad Halpha (>50%, Bongiorno et al. in prep) 3) search for outflows Common properties: Lx>10 44 NH>~10 22 red /dusty systems M*>10 11

X-shooter NIR spectra Brusa et al, in prep Spectro-z (from COSMOS optical campaigns: zcosmos, IMACS, Keck) Common properties: Lx>10 44 NH>~10 22 red /dusty systems M*>10 11

X-shooter NIR spectra Brusa et al, in prep PACS detected (PEP data) Common properties: Lx>10 44 NH>~10 22 red /dusty systems M*>10 11

Brusa et al, in prep X-shooter NIR spectra Radio detected (VLA data) none radio-loud Common properties: Lx>10 44 NH>~10 22 red /dusty systems M*>10 11

XID 2028 loglx~45 lognh~22 loglir>13 SFR~450 Msun/yr logmstar=11.7 FWHM([OIII])=810 km/s XID 5321 loglx=45 lognh=21.6 loglir=12.2 SFR>200 Msun/yr logmstar=12.1 FWHM([OIII])=1200 km/s outflow of ~300 km/s

X-ray obscured QSOs in a context Seyfert-ULIRG (Rodriguez-Zaurin +13) High-z ULIRGs (Harrison+2012 compilation) cluster around the z~2-4 SMG/ULIRGs SDSS AGN (Mullaney+13)

X-ray obscured QSOs in a context Seyfert-ULIRG (Rodriguez-Zaurin +13) High-z ULIRGs (Harrison+2012 compilation) cluster around the z~2-4 SMG/ULIRGs SDSS AGN (Mullaney+13)

Take home message feedback phase is luminous, X-ray bright, dusty: cheap selection: based on observed quantities vs. intrinsic properties large [OIII] widths are observed in X-ray selected, luminous, obscured and dusty QSOs: selection does work feedback phase is short (RARE objects): quest for very large area X-ray surveys (see also posters by Urry, Menzel)

erosita huge discovery space erosita(+4most) AGN science case expected ~3500 obscured QSO (Lx>45, NH>21, z=1-3) in the hard band can be easily identified by the combination of only 3 bands! see Merloni et al. 2012, arxiv:1209.2114