Spinor Field with Polynomial Nonlinearity in LRS Bianchi type-i spacetime Bijan Saha arxiv:1507.06236v1 [gr-qc] 22 Jul 2015 Laboratory of Information Technologies Joint Institute for Nuclear Research 141980 Dubna, Moscow region, Russia Within the scope of Bianchi type-i cosmological model the role of spinor field on the evolution of the Universe is investigated. In doing so we have considered a polynomial type of nonlinearity. It is found that depending on the sign of self-coupling constant the model allows either accelerated mode of expansion or oscillatory mode of evolution. Unlike general Bianchi type-i and Bianchi type I 0 models in this case neither mass term nor the nonlinear term in the Lagrangian of spinor field vanish. PACS numbers: 98.80.Cq Keywords: Spinor field, dark energy, anisotropic cosmological models, isotropization bijan@jinr.ru; http://bijansaha.narod.ru
2 Saha B. I. INTRODUCTION Recently, after some remarkable works by different authors [1 15], showing the important role that spinor fields play on the evolution of the Universe, the situation began to change. This change of attitude is directly related to some fundamental questions of modern cosmology: (i problem of initial singularity; (ii problem of isotropization and (iii late time acceleration of the Universe. Given the role that spinor field can play in the evolution of the Universe, question that naturally pops up is, if the spinor field can redraw the picture of evolution caused by perfect fluid and dark energy, is it possible to simulate perfect fluid and dark energy by means of a spinor field? Affirmative answer to this question was given in the a number of papers [16 20]. In those papers spinor description of matter such as perfect fluid and dark energy was given and the evolution of the Universe given by different Bianchi models was thoroughly studied. In almost all the papers the spinor field was considered to be time-dependent functions and its energy-momentum tensor was given by the diagonal elements only. Some latest study shows that due to the specific connection with gravitational field the energymomentum tensor of the spinor field possesses non-trivial non-diagonal components as well and these non-zero non-diagonal components of energy-momentum tensor play decisive role on the character of geometry of spacetime as well as on the components of spinor field [21 24]. In this paper we study the evolution of the Universe filled with spinor field within the scope of a LRS Bianchi type-i cosmological model. It should be noted that a general Bianchi type-i model in presence of a nonlinear spinor field dully evolves into a LRS Bianchi type-i model [22]. In this paper we thoroughly study in role of spinor field in the evolution of the Universe given by a LRS Bianchi type-i model. Here we also consider a more general type of nonlinearity. II. BASIC EQUATIONS In this report we plan to study the evolution of the Universe given by a Locally Rotationally Symmetric Bianchi type-i anisotropic cosmological model filled with nonlinear spinor field. The LRS Bianchi type-i (BI model is the ordinary Bianchi type-i model with two of the three metric functions being equal to each other and can be given by ds 2 = dt 2 a 2 1[ dx 2 + dy 2] a 2 3 dz2, (2.1 with and being the functions of time only. The nontrivial components of the Einstein tensor corresponding to the metric (2.1 are (ä3 G 1 1 = G2 2 = + ä1 + ȧ3 ȧ 1 ( G 3 3 = 2ä1 + ȧ2 1 a 2 1 (ȧ2 G 0 0 = 1 ȧ 1 a 2 + 2ȧ3 1, (2.2a, (2.2b. (2.2c Keeping this in mind the symmetry between ψ and ψ we choose the symmetrized Lagrangian [25] for the spinor field as [5]: L= ı [ ] ψγ µ µ ψ µ ψγ µ ψ m sp ψψ F, (2.3 2 where the nonlinear term F describes the self-interaction of a spinor field and can be presented as some arbitrary functions of invariants generated from the real bilinear forms of a spinor field. We
Spinor Field with Polynomial Nonlinearity in LRS Bianchi type-i spacetime 3 consider F = F(K, with K ={I, J, I + J, I J}. It can be shown that such a choice describes the nonlinearity in its most general form. Here µ is the covariant derivative of spinor field: µ ψ = ψ x µ Γ µψ, µ ψ = ψ x µ + ψγ µ, (2.4 with Γ µ being the spinor affine connection. In (2.3 γ s are the Dirac matrices in curve space-time and obey the following algebra γ µ γ ν + γ ν γ µ = 2g µν (2.5 and are connected with the flat space-time Dirac matrices γ in the following way g µν (x=e a µ(xe b ν(xη ab, γ µ (x=e a µ(x γ a, (2.6 where η ab = diag(1, 1, 1, 1 and e a µ is a set of tetrad 4-vectors. The spinor affine connection matrices Γ µ (x are uniquely determined up to an additive multiple of the unit matrix by the equation with the solution µ γ ν = γ ν x µ Γρ νµγ ρ Γ µ γ ν + γ ν Γ µ = 0, (2.7 Γ µ = 1 4 γ aγ ν µ e (a ν 1 4 γ ργ ν Γ ρ µν, (2.8 The spin affine connection corresponding to LRS BI metric (2.1 can be written explicitly as Γ 0 = 0, Γ 1 = ȧ1 γ 1 γ 0, Γ 2 = ȧ1 γ 2 γ 0, Γ 3 = ȧ3 γ 3 γ 0, (2.9 arying (2.3 with respect to ψ(ψ one finds the spinor field equations: ıγ µ µ ψ m sp ψ 2F K (SK I + ıpk J γ 5 ψ = 0, ı µ ψγ µ + m sp ψ+ 2F K ψ(sk I + ıpk J γ 5 =0. (2.10a (2.10b Here we denote F K = df/dk, K I = dk/di and K J = dk/dj. The energy-momentum tensor of the spinor field is given by Tµ ρ = i ( 4 gρν ψγ µ ν ψ+ ψγ ν µ ψ µ ψγ ν ψ ν ψγ µ ψ δµ ρ L sp (2.11 where L sp in view of (2.10 can be rewritten as L sp = 2[ ı ψγ µ µ ψ µ ψγ µ ψ ] m sp ψψ F(K = ı 2 ψ[γ µ µ ψ m sp ψ] ı 2 [ µ ψγ µ + m sp ψ]ψ F(K, = 2F K (IK I + JK J F = 2KF K F(K. (2.12 as Further inserting (2.4 into (2.11 the energy-momentum tensor of the spinor field can be written T ρ µ = ı 4 gρν( ψγ µ ν ψ+ ψγ ν µ ψ µ ψγ ν ψ ν ψγ µ ψ ı 4 gρν ψ ( γ µ Γ ν + Γ ν γ µ + γ ν Γ µ + Γ µ γ ν ψ δ ρ µ (2KF K F(K. (2.13
4 Saha B. Finally, exploiting the explicit form of spin connection (2.9 after some manipulations one find the following non-trivial components of the energy-momentum tensor of the spinor field T0 0 = m sps+ F(K, (2.14a T1 1 = T2 2 = T3 3 = F(K 2KF K, (2.14b T3 1 = ı (ȧ3 ȧ1 ψ γ 3 γ 1 γ 0 ψ = 1 (ȧ3 ȧ1 A 2, (2.14c 4 4 T3 2 = ı (ȧ1 ȧ3 ψ γ 2 γ 3 γ 0 ψ = 1 (ȧ1 ȧ3 A 1. (2.14d 4 4 So the complete set of Einstein equation for BI metric should be ä 3 + ä1 + ȧ3 ȧ 1 = κ(f(k 2KF K, (2.15a 2ä1 + ȧ2 1 a 2 = κ(f(k 2KF K, (2.15b 1 ȧ 2 1 a 2 1 + 2ȧ3 ȧ 1 = κ(m sp S+ F(K, (ȧ3 0= ȧ1 A 2,, (ȧ1 0= ȧ3 A 1. (2.15c (2.15d (2.15e Before solving the Einstein equations let us first write the equations for the bilinear spinor forms. Recalling there are 16 bilinear spinor forms, namely S = ψψ, P = ı ψγ 5 ψ, v µ = ψγ µ ψ, A µ = ψγ 5 γ µ ψ and Q µν = ψσ µν ψ are the scalar, pseudoscalar, vector, pseudovector and antisymmetric tensor, respectively, for the LRS BI metric one finds the following system of equations: Ṡ 0 +G A 0 0 = 0, Ṗ 0 ΦA 0 0 = 0, Ȧ 0 0 + ΦP 0 G S 0 = 0, v 3 0 + ΦQ30 0 +G Q21 0 Q 30 0 Φv3 0 Q 21 0 G v3 0 Ȧ 3 0 = 0, v 0 0 = 0, (2.16a (2.16b (2.16c (2.16d (2.16e = 0, (2.16f = 0, (2.16g = 0, (2.16h where we denote S 0 = S, P 0 = P, A µ 0 = A µ, v µ 0 = vµ, Q µν 0 = Q µν and Φ = m sp +D. We also denote D = 2SF K K I and G = 2PF K K J, with F K = df/dk, K I = dk/di and K J = dk/dj. Here we also introduce the volume scale = a 2 1. (2.17
Spinor Field with Polynomial Nonlinearity in LRS Bianchi type-i spacetime 5 From (2.16 one finds the following relations: (S 0 2 +(P 0 2 +(A 0 0 2 = C 1 = Const, (2.18a A 3 0 = C 2 = Const, (2.18b v 0 0 = C 3 = Const, (2.18c (Q 30 0 2 +(Q 21 0 2 +(v 3 0 2 = C 4 = Const. (2.18d Let us now go back to Einstein equations. The off-diagonal components of the Einstein equations (2.15d and (2.15e impose the following restrictions either on the components of the spinor field or on the metric functions: A 2 = 0, A 1 = 0, ȧ 3 ȧ1 = 0. (2.19a (2.19b The restriction (2.19b leads to = q 0 with q 0 being some constant. In this case the system can be described by a FRW model from the very beginning. Here we don t consider this case. WE will do it later within the scope of a FRW model. We consider the case when the restriction is imposed on the components of the spinor field in details. Subtraction of (2.15b from (2.15a gives that leads to [5] = D 1 1/3 exp ä 3 ä1 + ȧ1 (ȧ3 ȧ1 = 0, (2.20 ( ( dt dt X 1, =(1/D 2 1 1/3 exp 2X 1. (2.21 with D 1 and X 1 being the integration constants. Thus we see that the metric functions can be expressed in terms of. It can be shown that for an expanding Universe, when as t, the isotropization process of the Universe takes place. To prove that we exploit the isotropization condition proposed in [26] a i const. (2.22 a t Then by rescaling some of the coordinates, we can make a i /a 1, and the metric will become manifestly isotropic at large t. Taking into account that a= 1/3 from (2.21 we find ( dt a = D 1 exp X 1 D 1, a =(1/D2 1 exp ( dt 2X 1 1/D 2 1, (2.23 as. Recall that the isotropic FRW model has same scale factor in all three directions, i.e., (t=a 2 (t= (t= a(t. So for the LRS BI universe to evolve into a FRW one we should have D 1 = 1. Moreover, the isotropic nature of the present Universe leads to the fact that X 1 << 1, so that [(t] 1 dt 0 for t < (for (t=t n with n>1 the integral tends to zero as t. Our next step will be to define. Combining the diagonal Eistein equations (2.15a, (2.15b and (2.15c in a certain way for we find [5] = 3κ 2 ( msp S+ 2(F(K KF K. (2.24
6 Saha B. Now order to solve (2.24 we have to know the relation between the spinor and the gravitational fields. Using the equations (2.16a and (2.16b it can be show that K = 0 2 2, K ={I, J, I+ J, I J}. (2.25 The relation (2.25 holds for K = {J, I+ J, I J} only for massless spinor field, while for K = I it holds both for massless and massive spinor field. In case of K = I+ J one can write S=sin( 0 / and P=cos( 0 /, whereas for K = I J one can write S=cosh( 0 / and P= sinh( 0 /. In what follows, we will consider the case for K = I, setting F = λ n I n = λ n S 2n, as in this case further setting spinor mass m sp = 0 we can revive the results for other cases. Then inserting F = λ n I n = λ n S 2n into (2.24 and taking into account that in this case S= 0 / we find = 3κ [ m sp 0 + 2λ 2 (1 n0 ], 2n 1 2n (2.26 n with the solution in quadrature d 3κ [ m sp 0 + λ n 0 2N 2(1 N] = t+t 0, (2.27 + C with C and t 0 being some arbitrary constants. In what follows we solve the equations for, i.e., (2.26 numerically. But before doing that we write the solution to the spinor field equations explicitly. The solutions to the spinor field equations (2.10 in this case can be presented as [5] ψ 1,2 (t= C 1,2 exp ( i Φdt, ψ 3,4 (t= C 3,4 exp with C 1, C 2, C 3, C 4 being the integration constants and related to 0 as C 1 C 1+C 2 C 2 C 3 C 3 C 4 C 4 = 0. ( i Φdt, (2.28 Thus we see that the metric functions, the components of spinor field as well as the invariants constructed from metric functions and spinor fields are some inverse functions of of some degree. Hence at any spacetime point where = 0 it is a singular point. So we consider the initial value of (0 is small but non-zero. As a result for the nonlinear term to prevail in (2.26 we should have 1 2n<0, i.e., n>1/2, whereas for an expanding Universe when as t one should have 1 2n > 0, i.e., n < 1/2. So without losing the generality we can consider n = 0, n=1/2 and n=2. In this case we obtain = Φ 1 (, Φ 1 (= 3κ 2 [( msp + λ 0 + 2λ 2λ 4 0 3], (2.29 with the solution in quadrature d Φ 2 ( == t+t 0, Φ 2 (= 3κ [( m sp + λ 0 + λ 2 2λ0 4 3] + C. (2.30 Let us solve (2.29. For simplicity we consider 0 = 1, m sp = 1, κ = 1, t 0 = 0 and C= 10. The initial value of (0 should be taken in such as way that does not leads to 3κ [( m sp + λ 0 + λ 2 2λ 4 0 3] + C<0.
Spinor Field with Polynomial Nonlinearity in LRS Bianchi type-i spacetime 7 FIG. 1. Evolution of the Universe for a positive self-coupling constant λ. FIG. 2. Evolution of the Universe for a negative self-coupling constant λ. In our case we set (0 = 0.9. We have considered two different cases with a positive and a negative self-coupling constant λ. In case of λ = 1 (positive we have an accelerated mode of expansion of the Universe, while for negative coupling λ = 1 we have oscillatory solution. In Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 we have plotted the evolution of volume scale for a positive and negative self-coupling constant, respectively. As one sees from Fig. 1, a positive λ gives rise to a accelerated mode of expansion, whereas Fig. 2 shows the oscillatory mode of expansion. In Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 the corresponding picture of deceleration parameter q are illustrated.
8 Saha B. FIG. 3. Plot of deceleration parameter q for a positive self-coupling constant λ. FIG. 4. Plot of deceleration parameter q for a negative self-coupling constant λ. III. CONCLUSION Within the scope of Bianchi type-i cosmological model we have studied the role of spinor field in the evolution of the Universe. It is found that while the general Bianchi type-i model [21, 22] and Bianchi type I 0 model, both the mass tern and nonlinear tern in the Lagrangian disappears, in this case neither mass term nor the nonlinear term vanish. Moreover, unlike Bianchi type-i model the present model leads asymptotic isotropization. It is was also found that depending on the sign of self-coupling constant the model allows either accelerated mode of expansion or oscillatory mode of evolution. Acknowledgments This work is supported in part by a joint Romanian-LIT, JINR, Dubna Research Project, theme no. 05-6-1060-2005/2013.
Spinor Field with Polynomial Nonlinearity in LRS Bianchi type-i spacetime 9 [1] M. Henneaux Phys. Rev. D 21, 857 (1980 [2] U. Ochs and M. Sorg Int. J. Theor. Phys. 32, 1531 (1993 [3] B. Saha and G.N. Shikin Gen. Relat. Grav. 29, 1099 (1997 [4] B. Saha and G.N. Shikin J Math. Phys. 38, 5305 (1997 [5] B. Saha Phys. Rev. D 64, 123501 (2001 [6] B. Saha and T. Boyadjiev Phys. Rev. D 69, 124010 (2004 [7] B. Saha Phys. Rev. D 69, 124006 (2004 [8] B. Saha Phys. Particle. Nuclei. 37. Suppl. 1, S13 (2006 [9] B. Saha Grav. & Cosmol. 12(2-3(46-47, 215 (2006 [10] B. Saha Romanian Rep. Phys. 59, 649 (2007. [11] B. Saha Phys. Rev. D 74, 124030 (2006 [12] C. Armendáriz-Picón and P.B. Greene Gen. Relat. Grav. 35, 1637 (2003 [13] M.O. Ribas, F.P. Devecchi, and G.M. Kremer Phys. Rev. D 72, 123502 (2005 [14] R.C de Souza and G.M. Kremer Class. Quantum Grav. 25, 225006 (2008 [15] G.M. Kremer and R.C de Souza arxiv:1301.5163v1 [gr-qc] [16].G.Krechet, M.L. Fel chenkov, and G.N. Shikin Grav. & Cosmol. 14 No 3(55, 292 (2008 [17] B. Saha Cent. Euro. J. Phys. 8, 920 (2010a [18] B. Saha Romanian Rep. Phys. 62, 209 (2010b [19] B. Saha Astrophys. Space Sci. 331, 243 (2011 [20] B. Saha Int. J. Theor. Phys. 51, 1812 (2012 [21] B. Saha Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53 1109 (2014 [22] B. Saha Astrophys. Space Sci. 357 28 (2015 [23] B. Saha Nonlinear Spinor Fields in Bianchi type- I 0 spacetime arxiv: 1504.038831 [gr-qc]. [24] B. Saha Nonlinear Spinor Fields in Bianchi type-i spacetime arxiv: 1507.038471 [gr-qc]. [25] T.W.B. Kibble J. Math. Phys. 2, 212 (1961 [26] Bronnikov, K.A., Chudaeva, E.N., Shikin, G.N. Class. Quantum Grav. 21, 3389 (2004