International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 3, March-2014 ISSN

Similar documents
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 3, March-2014 ISSN

CHAPTER 5 EFFECTIVE ATOMIC NUMBER OF SELECTED POLYMERS BY GAMMA BACKSCATTERING TECHNIQUE

Compton suppression spectrometry

Copyright 2008, University of Chicago, Department of Physics. Gamma Cross-sections. NaI crystal (~2" dia) mounted on photo-multiplier tube

Compton Camera. Compton Camera

Characterizations and Diagnostics of Compton Light Source

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2012, 4(1): Research Article

Problem P7. Stéphanie Ménard. Dosimetry Department Fontenay-aux FRANCE IRSN QUADOS IRSN

Interactive Web Accessible Gamma-Spectrum Generator & EasyMonteCarlo Tools

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ON EFFECT OF COLLIMATOR SIZE ON THE ATTENUATION OF GAMMA RAY IN PURE ELEMENTS

Gamma-Spectrum Generator

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

The Compton Effect. Martha Buckley MIT Department of Physics, Cambridge, MA (Dated: November 26, 2002)

Experiment 6 1. The Compton Effect Physics 2150 Experiment No. 6 University of Colorado

Quartz-Crystal Spectrometer for the Analysis of Plutonium K X-Rays

Radiation Detection and Measurement

Attenuation of Radiation in Matter. Attenuation of gamma particles

Evaluation of the Nonlinear Response Function and Efficiency of a Scintillation Detector Using Monte Carlo and Analytical Methods

PHYS 3650L - Modern Physics Laboratory

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2012, 4(9): Research Article

Quantitative Assessment of Scattering Contributions in MeV-Industrial X-ray Computed Tomography

ESTIMATION OF 90 SCATTERING COEFFICIENT IN THE SHIELDING CALCULATION OF DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EQUIPMENT

Modern Physics. Laboratory Experiment. Compton Scattering. Boston University International Program. Technische Universität Dresden

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research

Development of a Hard X-Ray Polarimeter for Solar Flares and Gamma-Ray Bursts

Dependence Of Gamma Ray Attenuation On Concentration Of Manganese (II) Chloride Solution

Advanced lab course for Bachelor s students

TITLE: Air Kerma Primary Standard: Experimental and Simulation Studies on Cs-137

Development of a Dosimetric System using Spectrometric Technique suitable for Operational Radiation Dose Measurements and Evaluation

ON THE OMNIPRESENT BACKGROUND GAMMA RADIATION OF THE CONTINUOUS SPECTRUM

V. 3. Development of an Accelerator Beam Loss Monitor Using an Optical Fiber

Energy resolution and absolute detection efficiency for LSO crystals: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulation and experimental data

Radiation Signals and Signatures in a Detector (Gamma spectroscopy) Sangkyu Lee

4- Locate the channel number of the peak centroid with the software cursor and note the corresponding energy. Record these values.

Week 7: Ch. 10 Spec. w/ Scintillation Ctrs. Photomultiplier Devices

hν' Φ e - Gamma spectroscopy - Prelab questions 1. What characteristics distinguish x-rays from gamma rays? Is either more intrinsically dangerous?

CALIBRATION OF SCINTILLATION DETECTORS USING A DT GENERATOR Jarrod D. Edwards, Sara A. Pozzi, and John T. Mihalczo

Monte Carlo modelling of a NaI(Tl) scintillator detectors using MCNP simulation code

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 9, Issue 1, January ISSN

A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF COMPTON SUPPRESSION FOR NEUTRON ACTIVATION ANALYSIS. Joshua Frye Adviser Chris Grant 8/24/2012 ABSTRACT

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2012, 4(9): Research Article

A Germanium Detector with Optimized Compton Veto for High Sensitivity at Low Energy

Slides by: Prof. Abeer Alharbi

Design, construction and characterization of a portable irradiator to calibrate installed ambient dose equivalent monitors

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research

International Journal of Scientific Research and Reviews

Mass of the electron m 0

Copyright 2008, University of Chicago, Department of Physics. Experiment VI. Gamma Ray Spectroscopy

Sample Spectroscopy System Hardware

THE COMPTON EFFECT Last Revised: January 5, 2007

Shielding of Ionising Radiation with the Dosimetry & Shielding Module

Recent Activities on Neutron Standardization at the Electrotechnical Laboratory

Researchers at the University of Missouri-Columbia have designed a triple crystal

Figure 1. Decay Scheme for 60Co

Gate simulation of Compton Ar-Xe gamma-camera for radionuclide imaging in nuclear medicine

Multi Channel Analyzer (MCA) Analyzing a Gamma spectrum

AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Absorption and Backscattering of β-rays

ɣ-radiochromatography

EEE4106Z Radiation Interactions & Detection

Particles and Waves Particles Waves

Geant4 Monte Carlo code application in photon interaction parameter of composite materials and comparison with XCOM and experimental data

Maximum-Likelihood Deconvolution in the Spatial and Spatial-Energy Domain for Events With Any Number of Interactions

SCI-O11. Design of a Compton Spectrometer Experiment for Studying Electron Response of a Scintillator

A Radiation Monitoring System With Capability of Gamma Imaging and Estimation of Exposure Dose Rate

Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Gamma Attenuation of Building Materials

Radionuclide Imaging MII Detection of Nuclear Emission

Radionuclide Imaging MII Positron Emission Tomography (PET)

Chapter 2 Methods Based on the Absorption of Gamma-Ray Beams by Matter

EFFICIENCY SIMULATION OF A HPGE DETECTOR FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY LABORATORY/CDTN USING A MCNP-GAMMAVISION METHOD

Development of Gamma-ray Monitor using CdZnTe Semiconductor Detector

Jazan University College of Science Physics Department. Lab Manual. Nuclear Physics (2) 462 Phys. 8 th Level. Academic Year: 1439/1440

"Neutron Flux Distribution"

Lecture 3 - Compton Scattering

DUAL NATURE OF RADIATION AND MATTER I K GOGIA KV JHARODA KALAN DELHI.

The GEANT Low Energy Compton Scattering (GLECS) Package for use in Simulating Advanced Compton Telescopes

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 3 Feb 2011

X-RAY SPECTRA. Theory:

Drift plane. substrate (20ÉIm polyimide) 200ÉIm. Back strip (180ÉIm width) Base (Ceramic) Anode strip (10ÉIm width) Cathode strip (100ÉIm width)

Queen s University PHYS 352

Absorption and Backscattering ofβrays

Air Kerma Primary Standard: Experimental and. Simulation Studies on Cs-137. J. Cardoso, L. Santos, C. Oliveira

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Neutrino Helicity Measurement

Collimated LaBr 3 detector response function in radioactivity analysis of nuclear waste drums

Response Function of the BGO and NaI(Tl) Detectors Using Monte Carlo Simulations

Efficiency. Calculations for Selected Scintillators. > Detector Counting. Efficiency. > Photopeak Efficiency of Various Scintillation Materials

X-ray Energy Spectroscopy (XES).

Physics 23 Fall 1989 Lab 5 - The Interaction of Gamma Rays with Matter

Since the beam from the JNC linac is a very high current, low energy beam, energy loss induced in the material irradiated by the beam becomes very lar

Efficiency and Attenuation in CdTe Detectors

K 40 activity and Detector Efficiency

SOME ASPECTS OF MONTE CARLO SIMULATION FOR EFFICIENCY CALIBRATION OF GERMANIUM DETECTORS

Chapter Seven (Nuclear Detectors)

DIGITAL PULSE SHAPE ANALYSIS WITH PHOSWICH DETECTORS TO SIMPLIFY COINCIDENCE MEASUREMENTS OF RADIOACTIVE XENON

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 21 (11/29/06) Detection of Nuclear Radiation: Pulse Height Spectra

ISOCS / LabSOCS. Calibration software for Gamma Spectroscopy

Exposure Buildup Factors for Heavy Metal Oxide Glass: A Radiation Shield

Absorption of X-rays

Scholars Research Library. Gamma Ray Photon Interaction Studies of Cu in the Energy Range 10keV to 1500keV

Transcription:

308 Angular dependence of 662 kev multiple backscattered gamma photons in Aluminium Ravindraswami K a, Kiran K U b, Eshwarappa K M b and Somashekarappa H M c* a St Aloysius College (Autonomous), Mangalore 575 001, Karnataka, India. b Government Science College, Hassan 573 201, Karnataka, India. c University Science Instrumentation Center (USIC), Mangalore University, Mangalagangothri 574 199 (D K), Karnataka, India. * carrtmu@gmail.com Abstract In Compton backscattering experiments, the energy and intensity of backscattered radiation vary with the angle between primary and scattered radiation. When gamma rays are allowed to interact with thick targets, they undergo number of scatterings within the dimensions of the target before they escape from it, and thus resulting in multiple scattering of gamma-ray photons. Gamma-ray backscattering is very important to get useful information about shielding, dosimetry and non-destructive testing.in the present study, multiple scattering of 662 kev incident photons from 137 Cs (214 MBq) gamma source is measured as a function of target thickness for aluminium target. The backscattered photons from the samples are detected by a NaI (Tl) scintillation detector placed at backscattering angles of 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85, 95, 105, 115, 125 and 135. The singly scattered events are reconstructed analytically to get multiple scattering photons. We found multiple scattering increases with increase in sample thickness and saturates after a particular value called saturation thickness. The saturation thickness behaves differently in the two hemispheres and shows symmetry around 90. The optimum thickness at which the multiply scattered events saturate is also evaluated. Experimental results are compared with Monte Carlo N Particle code and are in good agreement. Keywords: Scintillation detector, saturation thickness, multiple scattering, MCNP simulation. 1. Introduction The photons interact with matter by a number of ways depending upon their energy. Among various processes of interaction of gamma rays with matter, photoelectric effect, Compton

309 scattering and pair production are the dominant processes in the energy range from 10 kev to 10MeV. Photoelectric effect predominates in the low energy region in high atomic number elements, while the pair production is possible only when the energy of incident photon is greater than 1.02MeV.Compton scattering predominates in intermediate energy range, is a powerful tool to study electron momentum distribution in an atom, non- destructive testing of samples, effective atomic number etc. The Compton profile can be obtained directly from the spectrum of photons emitted by a gamma source, scattered at a fixed angle from a target. A correct measurement of the Compton profile is possible only when photons scattered from the sample should undergo only one Compton collision. But in practice, the scattered beam invariably contains photons scattered more than once (multiple), when the scatterer is of finite dimensions both in depth and lateral extension. Hence an accurate measurement of intensity, angular and spectral distribution of multiply scattered photons accompanying singly scattered ones is essential for correct evaluation of Compton profiles, Compton cross sections and saturation thickness. In Compton scattering experiments involving thin targets, the generation of multiply backscattered photons is less as compared to singly backscattered events, with increase in target thickness, the flux of multiply backscattered photons gets enhanced and more backscattered photons are detected. So, along with the singly backscattered events, these multiply backscattered events also get registered. The numbers of multiply backscattered photons also depend upon the atomic number of the target used in the experiment(singh et al., 2006).Experimental measurements of multiple scattering have been reported by(singh et al., 2007a)(Singh et al., 2007b). (Paramesh et al., 1983)measured the saturation depth of multiply scattered gamma rays by subtracting the analytically evaluated contribution of singly scattered gamma rays at 120 for aluminium, iron, cooper, and lead. In the present experiment, measurements on multiple scattering are performed in Aluminium as a function of thickness and scattering angle, from 35 to 135 for 662 kev incident photons at various possible scattering angles. The optimum thickness at which the multiply scattered events saturate (saturation thickness) is also evaluated.

310 2. Experimental setup: The experimental setup to measure angular distribution backscattered radiation is shown in Fig. 1. In the present measurements, gamma photons are obtained using 137 Cs of strength 5.8 mci. To minimize the background and biological effects of radiation, the active portion of source is shielded using a cylindrical lead ring of thickness 50 mm and a diameter of 160 mm. The source shielding, detector shielding and collimation are obtained using cylindrical lead rings of 50 mm thickness. In addition to this, 4 cylindrical lead rings (120 mm diameter and 50 mm thickness) were specially prepared to enclose the source both from the back and the front sides. Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of experimental setup. The gamma ray spectrometer consists of 76 mm 76 mm NaI (Tl) scintillation detector. The distance of scatterer from source collimator is kept 220 mm so that angular spread due to source collimator (15 mm) on the target is 1.9. The distance of source can be varied up to 430 mm from the scatterer center. The detector crystal is covered with an aluminium window of 0.8 mm thick and optically coupled to photo-multiplier tube. To avoid the contribution due to background radiations the detector is shielded by cylindrical lead shielding of length 200 mm, thickness 35 mm and

311 internal diameter of 90 mm. The distance of source can be varied up to 400 mm and the distance of detector can be varied up to 270 mm from the scatterer center. The distance of the scatterer from the detector is kept 262 mm so that the angular spread due to the detector collimator (60 mm) on the target is 5.8. The entire experimental setup was placed at a height of 340 mm on a sturdy wooden table. This table was placed in the center of the room to minimize scattering from the walls of the room. The source-detector assembly is arranged in such a way that the centers of source collimator and gamma ray detector pass through the center of scatterer. Fig. 2. A typical experimentally observed spectrum (Curve-a) with 5 mm thick aluminium target at a scattering angle of 125. An observed background spectrum (Curve-b) without target in the primary beam. Background subtracted events (Curve-c). Normalized analytically reconstructed single scattered full energy peak (Curve-d).. Experimental data are accumulated on a PC based gamma spectrometer with fully integrated dmca (Make: Thermo scientific, Germany). A Window-XP based spectroscopic application software wintmca32 acts as user interface for system setup and display. All gamma ray spectral functional adjustments (e.g. noise level, dead time, fine gain, EHT etc.) are done through this application software. A software program using wintmca32 software package was written for the present experimental setup to find to backscattered counts, multiple scattering events and single scattering events.

312 The incident gamma photons of energy E 0 scattered at several points of the target contribute to scattered energy that continuously decreases, requiring different values of the detector efficiency and FWHM of the gamma detector corresponding to the scattered energy (E). The scintillation detector output will be a Gaussian distribution corresponding to each energy E is calculated using values of Y 0 (number of counts at peak position of the distribution). Y(E) is numerically integrated to obtain total number of photons at desired energy. The resulting distribution is an analytically estimated single scatter profile as detected by gamma detector. This is normalized at full-energy peak to obtain contribution of single scattered photons. Total intensity of the single scattered photons is then obtained by dividing normalized peak area by peak to total ratio corresponding to peak energy. The number of multiple scattered photons is obtained by subtracting of counts due to an analytically reconstructed distribution of single scatter events from measured experimental composite spectrum. 3. Results and discussions: Measurements of the scattered photons are carried out as a function of sample thickness for rectangular aluminium targets of 100 mm 100 mm using eight sources of various energies. A typical spectrum obtained by irradiating an aluminium sample of 5 mm thickness using 137 Cs source for 1000 seconds is presented in Fig. 2 (curve-a). Background spectrum is also recorded for same period of time to permit registration of events unrelated to target (curve-b of Fig. 2). Observed experimental spectrum obtained by subtracting events under curve-b from those under curve-a, consists of both single and multiple scattered events (curve-c of Fig. 2). Subtraction of reconstructed single scattered spectrum (curve-d of Fig. 2) from experimental spectrum in range the range 183 to 229 kev results in only multiple scattered photons. This procedure is repeated for different thicknesses of aluminium samples. Figure 3 shows the multiple scattering counts as a function of scattering angle for four different sample thickness. Multiple scattering increases with increase in sample thickness and saturates after a particular value called saturation thickness and shown in figure 4. This increase is due to availability of greater scattering centres for interaction of incident gamma rays with sample material. However, after reaching saturation thickness, the number of photons coming out of scatterer does not increase further with increase in sample thickness as probability for absorption within

313 a target sample gets enhanced. So, a stage is reached when thickness of sample becomes sufficient to compensate the increase and decrease of multiple scattered photons. Hence, the number of multiple scattered photons coming out of scatterer saturates. The saturation thickness for 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85, 95, 105, 115, 125 and 135 is obtained from the graph is 81, 76, 78, 80, 90, 87, 80, 85, 89, 84 and 81 mm respectively. To validate the results obtained, the experimental setup has been simulated using Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) code. The mean free path for 662 kev gamma photons is 49.83 mm. The simulated data of multiple scattered intensity increases with increase in target thickness and attains saturation (Fig. 5). This behavior supports the present experimental data Fig. 3. Multiple scattered photons as a function of scattering angle. 4. Conclusions: Present measurements also confirm that the number of multiple scattered events, having energy equal to single scattered events, saturates with increasing sample thickness. It is observed that the intensity of multiply scattered photons goes on decreasing from 35 0 to 85 0, reaching a minimum at 90 and again increases from 95 to 135. The dip in the curves nearly at 90 occurs due to the fact, that at this particular scattering angle, the active thickness of the scatterer does not change along the direction normal to the primary beam with increase in the thickness of the scatterer.

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 3, March-2014 Fig. 4. A plot of saturation thicknesses for different scattering angles. Fig. 5. A function of multiple scattering photons and mean free path. 314

315 References: Paramesh, L., Venkataramaih, P., Gopala, K., Sanjeevaih, H., 1983. Z-Dependence of saturation depth 662 kev photons from thick samples. Nucl. Instruments Methods 206, 327 330. Singh, G., Singh, M., Sandhu, B.S., Singh, B., 2007a. Experimental investigation of multiple scattering of 662keV gamma rays in zinc at 90. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 76, 750 758. Singh, G., Singh, M., Singh, B., Sandhu, B.S., 2006. Experimental observation of Z- dependence of saturation depth of 0.662MeV multiply scattered gamma rays. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. with Mater. Atoms 251, 73 78. Singh, M., Singh, G., Sandhu, B.S., Singh, B., 2007b. Angular distribution of 662keV multiply-compton scattered gamma rays in copper. Radiat. Meas. 42, 420 427.