Suppressing Speckle Noise for Simultaneous Differential Extrasolar Planet Imaging (SDI) at the VLT and MMT

Similar documents
Supplemental Materials to An Imaging Survey for Extrasolar Planets around 54 Close, Young Stars with SDI at the VLT and MMT 1

Searching for Extrasolar Planets with Simultaneous Differential Imaging

arxiv:astro-ph/ v3 21 Mar 2006

High contrast imaging at 3-5 microns. Philip M. Hinz University of Arizona Matt Kenworthy, Ari Heinze, John Codona, Roger Angel

Techniques for direct imaging of exoplanets

Gl 86B: a white dwarf orbits an exoplanet host star

Exoplanets Direct imaging. Direct method of exoplanet detection. Direct imaging: observational challenges

Exoplanets in the mid-ir with E-ELT & METIS

AN IMAGING SURVEY FOR EXTRASOLAR PLANETS AROUND 45 CLOSE, YOUNG STARS WITH THE SIMULTANEOUS DIFFERENTIAL IMAGER AT THE VERY LARGE TELESCOPE AND MMT 1

Christian Marois Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Exoplanets Direct imaging. Direct method of exoplanet detection. Direct imaging: observational challenges

A novel L-band imaging search for giant planets in the Tucana and β Pictoris moving groups

High Dynamic Range and the Search for Planets

End to End Simulation of AO-assisted coronagraphic differential imaging: estimation of performance for SPHERE

MODES OF 5, GERT T FINGER 1, REINHARD GENZEL 5, MARKUS HARTUNG

G.Witzel Physics and Astronomy Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA , USA

An Adaptive Optics Survey of M8-M9 stars: Discovery of 4 Very Low Mass Binaries With at Least One System Containing a Brown Dwarf Companion

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 26 Jun 2001

NACO-SDI DIRECT IMAGING SEARCH FOR THE EXOPLANET ERI b 1

Eric L. Nielsen, Steward Observatory Michelson Fellow

Gemini NICI Planet-Finding Campaign: Statistical Constraints on Planet Populations

ADVANCING HIGH-CONTRAST ADAPTIVE OPTICS

Directing Imaging Techniques of Exoplanets

4. Direct imaging of extrasolar planets. 4.1 Expected properties of extrasolar planets. Sizes of gas giants, brown dwarfs & low-mass stars

High Contrast Imaging: Direct Detection of Extrasolar Planets

LARGE BINOCULAR TELESCOPE CORPORATION

NICMOS Status and Plans

High-contrast Coronagraph Development in China for Direct Imaging of Extra-solar Planets

EPICS: A planet hunter for the European ELT

Brown Dwarfs and Planets around Nearby Stars. A Coronagraphic Search for. B. R. Oppenheimer (AMNH) Morino,, H. Suto,, M. Ishii, M. K.

Coronagraphic Imaging of Exoplanets with NIRCam

Adaptive Optics for the Giant Magellan Telescope. Marcos van Dam Flat Wavefronts, Christchurch, New Zealand

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 13 May 2004

Suppressing stellar residual light on extremely large telescopes by aperture modulation

arxiv: v3 [astro-ph.im] 28 Nov 2017

Exoplanet High Contrast Imaging Technologies Ground

1.0 L53 1. INTRODUCTION 2. AN ADAPTIVE OPTICS SURVEY OF NEARBY M8 M9 FIELD STARS. The Astrophysical Journal, 567:L53 L57, 2002 March 1

1. Give short answers to the following questions. a. What limits the size of a corrected field of view in AO?

The VLT dealing with the Atmosphere, a Night Operation point of view

ADAPTIVE PHASE MASK CORONAGRAPH

Science with EPICS, the E-ELT planet finder

Transiting Exoplanet in the Near Infra-red for the XO-3 System

HIGH-CONTRAST IMAGING OF YOUNG PLANETS WITH JWST

Direct imaging of extra-solar planets

Extrasolar Planets. Methods of detection Characterization Theoretical ideas Future prospects

Adaptive Optics Overview Phil Hinz What (Good) is Adaptive Optics?

A high-contrast adaptiveoptics imaging search for brown dwarfs

Searching for Other Worlds

Exoplanet Detection and Characterization with Mid-Infrared Interferometry

Scientists Make Highest Resolution Photos Ever of the Night Sky

The Four-Quadrant Phase Mask Coronagraph. IV. First Light at the Very Large Telescope

Speckle Interferometry

APPLICATION FOR OBSERVING TIME

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 18 Jun 2012

ARIES: Arizona infrared imager and echelle spectrograph

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 2 Oct 2002

Planets are plentiful

Exoplanet science with ground based ELTs

Searching for Binary Y dwarfs with the Gemini GeMS Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics System

Exoplanets Atmospheres. Characterization of planetary atmospheres. Photometry of planetary atmospheres from direct imaging

An apodizing phase plate coronagraph for VLT/NACO

Exoplanet Search Techniques: Overview. PHY 688, Lecture 28 April 3, 2009

Searching for extrasolar planets with SPHERE. Mesa Dino, Raffaele Gratton, Silvano Desidera, Riccardo Claudi (INAF OAPD)

Gemini Planet Imager. Raphaël Galicher from presentations provided by James Graham and Marshall Perrin

Direct imaging characterisation of (exo-) planets with METIS

Scientific context in 2025+

Lab 4: Differential Photometry of an Extrasolar Planetary Transit

Speckles and adaptive optics

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 26 Feb 2011

TRIDENT: An Infrared Differential Imaging Camera Optimized for the Detection of Methanated Substellar Companions 1

TrES Exoplanets and False Positives: Finding the Needle in the Haystack

The Potential of Ground Based Telescopes. Jerry Nelson UC Santa Cruz 5 April 2002

Optical Interferometry Phil Hinz Image Synthesis in Interferometry

arxiv: v3 [astro-ph] 10 Oct 2007

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 8 Jun 1995

Water Ice on the Satellite of Kuiper Belt Object 2003 EL61

ASTRONOMY. Chapter 18 THE STARS: A CELESTIAL CENSUS PowerPoint Image Slideshow

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ep] 5 May 2014

Characterization of Exoplanets in the mid-ir with JWST & ELTs

Imaging Survey for Faint Companions with Shaped Pupil Masks 1

ASTR 2310: Chapter 6

First images from exoplanet hunter SPHERE

The World's Largest (operating) Telescopes.

Adaptive Optics with Laser Guide Stars - The ALFA system

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 28 Oct 2006

Seeing another Earth: Detecting and Characterizing Rocky Planets with Extremely Large Telescopes

Roadmap for PCS, the Planetary Camera and Spectrograph for the E-ELT

Chapter 6 Light and Telescopes

Hubble Science Briefing

ADVANCED CCD PHOTOMETRY AND EXOPLANET TRANSIT PHOTOMETRY. By : Kenny A. Diaz Eguigure

NEWFIRM Quick Guide for Proposal Preparation

1 HeNe Laser Profile

FIRST ON-SKY HIGH-CONTRAST IMAGING WITH AN APODIZING PHASE PLATE 1

Foundations of Astronomy 13e Seeds. Chapter 6. Light and Telescopes

Extreme Adaptive Optics in the mid-ir: The METIS AO system

AST 101 Intro to Astronomy: Stars & Galaxies

Direct detection: Seeking exoplanet colors and spectra

Light Pollution. Atmospheric Seeing. Seeing Through the Atmosphere. Atmospheric Absorption of Light

Light and Telescopes

DEEP KECK ADAPTIVE OPTICS SEARCHES FOR EXTRASOLAR PLANETS IN THE DUST OF ERIDANI AND VEGA Bruce A. Macintosh

Transcription:

Direct Imaging of Exoplanets: Science and Techniques Proceedings IAU Colloquium No. 200, 2005 C. Aime and F. Vakili, Eds. c 2005 International Astronomical Union DOI: 00.0000/X000000000000000X Suppressing Speckle Noise for Simultaneous Differential Extrasolar Planet Imaging (SDI) at the VLT and MMT Beth A. Biller 1, Laird M. Close 1, Rainer Lenzen 2, Wolfgang Brandner 2, Donald McCarthy 1, Eric Nielsen 1, Stephan Kellner 2, and Markus Hartung 3 1 Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 email: bbiller@as.arizona.edu 2 Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 3 European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Santiago 19, Chile Abstract. We discuss the instrumental and data reduction techniques used to suppress speckle noise with the Simultaneous Differential Imager (SDI) implemented at the VLT and the MMT. SDI uses a quad filter to take images simultaneously at 3 wavelengths surrounding the 1.62 µm methane bandhead found in the spectrum of cool brown dwarfs and gas giants. By performing a difference of images in these filters, speckle noise from the primary can be significantly attenuated, resulting in photon noise limited data. Non-trivial data reduction tools are necessary to pipeline the simultaneous differential imaging. Here we discuss a custom algorithm implemented in IDL to perform this reduction. The script performs basic data reduction tasks but also precisely aligns images taken in each of the filters using a custom shift and subtract routine. In our survey of nearby young stars at the VLT and MMT (see Biller et al., this conference), we achieved H band contrasts >25000 (5σ F1(1.575 µm) > 10.0 mag, H>11.5 mag for a T6 spectral type object) at a separation of 0.5 from the primary star. We believe that our SDI images are among the highest contrast astronomical images ever made from ground or space for methane rich companions. Keywords. instrumentation: adaptive optics, methods: data analysis, techniques: image processing, (stars:) planetary systems 1. Introduction Adaptive optics (AO) systems that are photon noise limited can detect an object up to 10 5 times fainter its primary at separations >1 sufficient to detect a young, selfluminous giant extrasolar planet. However, the contrast problem isn t the only obstacle in directly detecting extrasolar planets Beyond the contrast limit problem, all AO systems suffer from a limiting speckle noise floor (Racine et al. 1999). Within 1 of the primary star, the field is filled with speckles left over from instrumental features and residual atmospheric turbulence after adaptive optics correction. These speckles vary as a function of time and color. For photon noise limited data, the signal to noise S/N is proportional to t 0.5, where t is the exposure time. For speckle-noise limited data, the S/N does not increase with time past a specific speckle-noise floor (limiting contrasts to 10 3 at 0.5 ). This speckle-noise floor is considerably above the photon noise limit and makes planet detection very difficult. Interestingly, space telescopes such as HST also suffer from a similar limiting speckle-noise floor due to imperfect optics and breathing (Schneider 119

120 Biller et al. Figure 1. Left: Two minutes of raw SDI data from NACO SDI s 1024 1024 Aladdin array in the CONICA AO camera (Lenzen et al. 2004). Right: Same dataset, slightly processed. Apertures have been selected around each filter image. In order to reveal the speckle pattern, a heavily smoothed image was subtracted from the raw images (unsharp masking). The resulting speckle patterns are very similar between the 4 simultaneous images which means that an effective subtraction of speckles can be obtained between the filters. et al. 2003). Direct detection of extrasolar giant planets requires special instrumentation to suppress this speckle noise floor and produce photon noise limited images. Simultaneous Differential Imaging is an instrumental method which can be used to calibrate and remove the speckle noise in AO images, while also isolating the planetary light from the starlight. This method was pioneered by Racine et al. (1999), Marois et al. (2000), Marois et al. (2002) and Marois et al. (2005). It exploits the fact that all cool (T eff <1200 K) extra-solar giant planets are thought to have strong CH 4 (methane) absorption redwards of 1.62 µm in the H band infrared atmospheric window (Burrows et al. 2001, Burrows et al. 2003). Our SDI device obtains four images of a star simultaneously through three slightly different narrowband filters (sampling both inside and outside of the CH 4 features). These images are then differenced. This subtracts out the halo and speckles from the bright star to reveal any massive extrasolar planets orbiting that star. Since a massive planetary companion will be brightest in the F1 1.575 µm filter and absorbed in the rest, while the star is bright in all three, a difference can be chosen which subtracts out the star s light and reveals the light from the companion. Thus, SDI also helps eliminate the large contrast difference between the star and substellar companions. 2. The SDI AO Cameras at the VLT and MMT An SDI imaging scheme is currently implemented at the 6.5m MMT (using the MMT AO adaptive secondary mirror and the ARIES AO camera McCarthy et al. 1998) and at the ESO VLT (using the 8m UT4 and the NAOS-CONICA (NACO) AO system) by a group headed by L. Close and R. Lenzen (Close et al. 2005, Lenzen et al. 2004, Lenzen et al. 2005). Both devices are fully commissioned and available for observing. The SDI technique requires some specialized optics consisting of a cryogenic custom double calcite Wollaston device and a focal plane quad CH 4 filter. Our custom Wollaston splits the beam into four identical beams while minimizing non-common path errors. The differential non-common path errors are less than 10 nm RMS per Zernike mode (Lenzen et al. 2004). Each of the four beams is fed through one of the filters on the quad filter. Filter wavelengths were chosen on and off the methane absorption feature at 1.62 µm and were spaced closely (every 0.025 µm) in order to limit residuals due to speckle and calcite chromatism. We used four filters F1, F2, F3a, and F3b with central wavelengths F1=1.575 µm, F2=1.600 µm, and F3a=F3b=1.625 µm. The filters are approximately 0.025 µm in bandwidth. A cold 5 5 focal plane mask has been implemented as a field stop for the VLT device. No coronagraph is currently used, since the Strehl ratios ( 20-

SDI pipeline 121 Figure 2. Pipeline Block Diagrams 30%) are too low to increase the contrasts significantly. The SDI camera has a platescale of 0.017 /pix. 3. Observational Technique and Data Reductions A raw dataset from NACO SDI is shown in Fig. 1. The inner 0.2 diameter core is saturated in each image to increase signal in the halo. After unsharp masking, we find that the speckle patterns in each of the separate filters are nearly identical. (See Fig. 1). This bodes well for our ability to attenuate speckle noise. To distinguish between faint planets and any residual speckles, we observe each object at a variety of position angles. Instrumental and telescope super speckles (Racine et al. 1999) should not rotate with a change of rotator angle; however, a real planet should appear to rotate by the change in rotator angle. The data is reduced using a custom IDL script. A pipeline block diagram for this IDL script is presented in Fig. 2. Alignments are performed using a custom shift and subtract algorithm. We calculate 2 differences (and one non-differenced combination) which are sensitive to substellar companions of spectral types T (T eff < 1200 K), Y (T eff 600 K), and L (T eff > 1200 K). Data taken at different position angles are subtracted (e.g. 20 minutes of data at 0 degrees minus 20 minutes of data at 33 degrees) in order to further attenuate speckle noise. A fully reduced dataset from the VLT SDI device as well as the same dataset reduced in a standard AO manner is presented in Fig. 3. Simulated planets were inserted into the dataset pre-reduction. In the SDI reduction, simulated planets (with F1=10 5σ attenuation in magnitudes in the 1.575 µm F1 filter) are detected with S/N > 10 past 0.7. In comparison, none of the simulated planets are clearly detected in the standard AO data reduction and numerous bright super speckles remain in the field. A plot of F1 (5σ) vs. separation from the primary is presented in Fig. 3. For this dataset, we

122 Biller et al. Figure 3. Left: A complete reduced dataset (40 minutes of data at a series of rotator angles 0, 33, 33, 0 ) from the VLT SDI device. Simulated planets have been added at separations of 0.55, 0.85, and 1.35 from the primary, with F1 = 10 mag (attenuation in magnitudes in the F1 1.575 µm filter) fainter than the primary. These planets are scaled from unsaturated images of the example star taken right before the example dataset (and have fluxes in each filter appropriate for a T6 object). Past 0.7, the simulated planets are detected with S/N > 10. Center: Standard AO data reduction of the same dataset. Images have been coadded, flat-fielded, sky-subtracted, and unsharp-masked. Simulated planets have been added with the same properties and at the same separations as before. None of the simulated planets are clearly detected in the standard AO reduction. Additionally, numerous bright super speckles remain in the field. Right: F1 (5σ attenuation in magnitudes in the 1.575 µm F1 filter) vs. Separation for 40 minutes of VLT SDI data for a 70 Myr K1V star at 15 pc. The top curve is the AO PSF. The next curve is the classical AO PSF unsharp masked. The third curve down is 40 minutes of SDI 0-33 data. The last curve is the theoretical contrast limit due to photon-noise. At star-companion separations > 0.5, we are photon-noise limited and achieve star to planet H band contrasts >25000 (5σ F1(1.575 µm) > 10.0 mag, H>11.5 mag for a T6 spectral type object) at a separation of 0.5 from the primary star. Table 1. Properties of Example SDI Survey Stars and Comparison Stars Case Spectral Type Age Distance H V F1 at 0.5 H at 0.5 Exposure Time A K2V 30 Myr 45.5 pc 7.1 9.1 10.5 12 40 min B K1V 70 Myr 15 pc 4.8 6.9 10.5 12 40 min C M3V 30 Myr 24 pc 7.1 12.2 10 11.5 40 min Masciadri et al. M 8.61 10.31 10-25 min Gl 86* K1V 10 Gyr 10.9 pc 4.2 6.2 12.8 14.3 80 min * Mugrauer & Neuhäuser 2005 achieved star to planet H band contrasts (5σ) >25000 (5σ F1(1.575 µm) > 10.0 mag, H>11.5 mag for a T6 spectral type object) at a separation of 0.5 from the primary star approaching the photon-noise limit in 40 minutes of data. F1(1.575 µm) and H (for a methane object) for 3 of our survey stars (see Biller et al. this conference) as well as for two other comparison objects are shown in Table 1 it is clear that the achievable contrast varies according to the magnitude of the object and total exposure time. We believe these are among the highest contrast astronomical images taken to date of methane rich companions. Acknowledgements BAB acknowledges support through the NASA GSRP program. LMC acknowledges support through NSF CAREER and NASA Origins grants.

References SDI pipeline 123 Burrows, A., Hubbard, W.B., Lunine, J. & Liebert, J. 2001, Reviews of Modern Physics 73, 719 Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D. & Lunine, J. 2003, ApJ 596, 587 Close, L.M., Lenzen, R., Biller, B.A., Brandner, W. & Hartung, M. 2005, Science with AO ESO Workshop September 16-19 2003, 136 Lenzen, R., Close, L., Brandner, W., Hartung, M., & Biller, B. 2004, Proc. SPIE 5492 Lenzen, R., Close, L., Brandner, W., Biller, B., & Hartung, M. 2005, Science with AO ESO Workshop September 16-19 2003, 46 Masciadri, E. et al. 2006, IAUC 200 proceedings Marois, C., Doyon, R., Racine, R., & Nadeau, D. 2000, Proceedings of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 112, 91 Marois, C., Doyon, R., Racine, R., & Nadeau, D. 2002, Proc. SPIE 4008, 788 Marois, C., Doyon, R., Nadeau, D., Racine, R., Riopel, M., Vallée, P., & Lafrenière, D 2005, Proceedings of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 117, 745 McCarthy, D., Burge, J., Angel, R., Ge, J., Sarlot, R., Fitz-Patrick, B., & Hinz, J. 1998, Proc. SPIE 3354, 750 Mugrauer, M. & Neuhäuser, R. 2005, MNRAS, 361, L15 Racine, R., Walker, G.A.H., Nadeau, D., Doyon, R., & Marois, C. 1999, Proceedings of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 111, 587 Schneider, G., Becklin, E., Close, L., Figer, D., Lloyd, J., Macintosh, B., Hines, D., Max, C., Potter, D., Rieke, M., Scoville, N., Thompson, R., Weinberg, A., & Windhorst, R. 2003, solicited by STScI in preparation for HST Cycle 12