SECTION 9 ORBIT DATA - LAUNCH TRAJECTORY

Similar documents
CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Proton Launch System Mission Planner s Guide SECTION 2. LV Performance

Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

NAVIGATION & MISSION DESIGN BRANCH

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) Mission Design: A Pegasus Class Mission to a High Energy Orbit

Chapter 8. Precise Lunar Gravity Assist Trajectories. to Geo-stationary Orbits

Orbits in Geographic Context. Instantaneous Time Solutions Orbit Fixing in Geographic Frame Classical Orbital Elements

RAPID GEOSYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER ORBIT ASCENT PLAN GENERATION. Daniel X. Junker (1) Phone: ,

Orbit Definition. Reference Vector. Vernal (March) Equinox Vector. Sun Vector

Figure 1. View of ALSAT-2A spacecraft

SPACECRAFT FORMATION CONTROL IN VICINITY OF LIBRATION POINTS USING SOLAR SAILS

EUROSTAR 3000 INCLINED ORBIT MISSION : LIFETIME OPTIMISATION IN CASE OF INJECTION WITH A LOW INCLINATION

The Launch of Gorizont 45 on the First Proton K /Breeze M

Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers. Dr Ugur GUVEN

List of Tables. Table 3.1 Determination efficiency for circular orbits - Sample problem 1 41

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 2 Due Tuesday, July 14, in class.

Section 13. Orbit Perturbation. Orbit Perturbation. Atmospheric Drag. Orbit Lifetime

LAUNCHES AND LAUNCH VEHICLES. Dr. Marwah Ahmed

Satellite Communications

On Sun-Synchronous Orbits and Associated Constellations

Launch strategy for Indian lunar mission and precision injection to the Moon using genetic algorithm

Satellite meteorology

MAHALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE-TRICHY QUESTION BANK UNIT I PART A

Experimental Analysis of Low Earth Orbit Satellites due to Atmospheric Perturbations

Chapter 4. Integrated Algorithm for Impact Lunar Transfer Trajectories. using Pseudo state Technique

Attitude Control Method of Spin-Stabilized Satellite Base on Equiangular Precession

Orbit and Transmit Characteristics of the CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR) JPL Document No. D-29695

The Orbit Control of ERS-1 and ERS-2 for a Very Accurate Tandem Configuration

SSTD = Standard deviation SMA = Semi Major Axis

Planning, Simulation, and Assessment of Various Missions from Wallops Flight Facility using Satellite Toolkit (STK)

New Worlds Observer Final Report Appendix J. Appendix J: Trajectory Design and Orbit Determination Lead Author: Karen Richon

Optimization of Eccentricity during a Two Burn Station Acquisition Sequence of a Geosynchronous Orbit

INTER-AGENCY SPACE DEBRIS COORDINATION COMMITTEE (IADC) SPACE DEBRIS ISSUES IN THE GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT AND THE GEOSTATIONARY TRANSFER ORBITS

Creating Satellite Orbits

1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded

ASEN 6008: Interplanetary Mission Design Lab Spring, 2015

Galileo Extended Slots Characterisation and Relation with the Nominal Constellation

AE 415/713 Spaceflight Mechanics, Spring 2008 Question Bank

Keplerian Elements Tutorial

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF GEOSTATIONARY-EARTH-ORBIT WITH SIMPLIFIED PERTURBATIONS MODELS

SIMBOL-X: A FORMATION FLYING MISSION ON HEO FOR EXPLORING THE UNIVERSE

Orbital Debris Observation via Laser Illuminated Optical Measurement Techniques

End of Life Re-orbiting The Meteosat-5 Experience

Proton Launch System Mission Planner s Guide APPENDIX F. Proton Launch System Options and Enhancements

DE-ORBITATION STUDIES AND OPERATIONS FOR SPIRALE GTO SATELLITES

No End of Push-broom Operations

LAUNCH SYSTEMS. Col. John Keesee. 5 September 2003

Chapter 5 - Part 1. Orbit Perturbations. D.Mortari - AERO-423

RELATIVE MISSION ANALYSIS FOR PROBA 3: SAFE ORBITS AND CAM

Ossama Abdelkhalik and Daniele Mortari Department of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University,College Station, TX 77843, USA

AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology

AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology

North Korea Satellite Launch

Geosynchronous patrol orbit for space situational awareness

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.

OptElec: an Optimisation Software for Low-Thrust Orbit Transfer Including Satellite and Operation Constraints

Satellite communications and the environment of space. V 1.1 Swiss Space Summer Camp 2016 Images: NASA 1

An Optical Survey for Space Debris on Highly Eccentric MEO Orbits

A SURVEY OF BALLISTIC TRANSFERS TO LOW LUNAR ORBIT

Introduction to Satellite Orbits

The Air Force Association 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia

EXTENDED MISSION TRAJECTORY OPTIONS FOR THE VAN ALLEN PROBES MISSION

AN ANALYTICAL SOLUTION TO QUICK-RESPONSE COLLISION AVOIDANCE MANEUVERS IN LOW EARTH ORBIT

Hybrid (Ion and Chemical) GEO Stationkeeping Maneuver Planning Software

ERS-2 and ENVISAT orbit control Current and future strategy The impact on the interferometric baseline

Fundamentals of Satellite technology

Usage of IGS TEC Maps to explain RF Link Degradations by Spread-F, observed on Cluster and other ESA Spacecraft

HYPER Industrial Feasibility Study Final Presentation Orbit Selection

ROCSAT-3 Constellation Mission

PHYSICS 1030 Homework #9

Toshinori Kuwahara*, Yoshihiro Tomioka, Yuta Tanabe, Masato Fukuyama, Yuji Sakamoto, Kazuya Yoshida, Tohoku University, Japan

East West GEO Satellite Station-Keeping with Degraded Thruster Response

Design of Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem

AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

AUTOMATIC NAVIGATION OF FY-2 GEOSYNCRONOUS METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE IMAGES. Xu Jianmin Lu Feng Zhang Qishong

Case Studies for Uncertainty Quantification of a High-fidelity Spacecraft Oriented Break-up Tool. Bent Fritsche, HTG Stijn Lemmens, ESA

ANALYSIS OF THE MEGHA-TROPIQUES TRAJECTORY. DETERMINATION OF RENDEZ-VOUS CONDITIONS WITH THE TERRA SATELLITE.

MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. Principles of Space Systems Design

Dilution of Disposal Orbit Collision Risk for the Medium Earth Orbit Constellations

Falcon-9 stage 2 post-burn fuel dump observation from Australia May 10, Jim Oberg July 10, 2018 ROUGH REVIEW DRAFT

GLAST Mission Overview. Delta II 7920H-10 Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, FL Space Launch Complex-17B

CHAPTER 25 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS # DEFINITIONS TERMS. Satellite. 1) A celestial body that orbits around a planet.

DEFINITION OF A REFERENCE ORBIT FOR THE SKYBRIDGE CONSTELLATION SATELLITES

COLLISION RISK ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR THE GSOC GEO SATELLITES

Sentinel-1B Flight Dynamics Operations during LEOP and Acquisition of its Reference Orbit: Achieving the Sentinel-1 Constellation

ASTRIUM. Interplanetary Path Early Design Tools at ASTRIUM Space Transportation. Nathalie DELATTRE ASTRIUM Space Transportation.

TUNDRA DISPOSAL ORBIT STUDY

GNSS: Global Navigation Satellite Systems

RECENT SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE F.ALBY

ORBITAL DECAY PREDICTION AND SPACE DEBRIS IMPACT ON NANO-SATELLITES

ORBIT DESIGN AND SIMULATION FOR KUFASAT NANO- SATELLITE

PHYSICS 1030 Homework #9

Libration Orbit Mission Design: Applications Of Numerical And Dynamical Methods

EasyChair Preprint. Retrograde GEO Orbit Design Method Based on Lunar Gravity Assist for Spacecraft

THE METOP-A ORBIT ACQUISITION STRATEGY AND ITS LEOP OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE

ACHIEVING THE ERS-2 ENVISAT INTER-SATELLITE INTERFEROMETRY TANDEM CONSTELLATION.

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S * Terms and definitions relating to space radiocommunications

Seminar 3! Precursors to Space Flight! Orbital Motion!

Transcription:

SECTION 9 ORBIT DATA - LAUNCH TRAJECTORY

--~'-

SECTION 9 LAUNCH TRAJECTORY 9.1 MISSION PROFILE IUE was launched by a three-stage Delta 2914 launch vehicle from Cape Kennedy on January 26, 1978 at l7 h 36 m OS.206 GMT. At an altitude of 89 nautical miles, it was injected into a near-circular parking orbit with an inclination of 28.7 degrees. After coasting for about 34 minutes, the booster injected the spacecraft into a transfer orbit with an argument of perigee of 257.4 degrees. Following injection into the transfer orbit, the spacecraft orbit and attitude were determined from tracking and telemetry data. The hydrazine reaction control system was then used to reorient the spacecraft into the apogee motor firing attitude. About 22 minutes prior to the second apogee passage of the transfer orbit, the apogee boost motor was fired to inject the satellite into a synchronous orbit with an eccentricity of 0.25. 9.2 ORBITAL ELEMENTS The parking orbit achieved was defined by the following parameters: Semi-major Axis 6542.496 km Eccentricity 0.01871 Inclination 28.728 deg Right Ascension of the Ascending Node 209.185 deg Argument of Perigee 47.791 deg Mean Anomaly 94.746 deg Epoch 780126 l7 h 44m 59 s. 0 GMT Following the period of coasting, the spacecraft was injected into the parking orbit. The orbital parameters were: Semi -major Axi s 29677.110 km Eccentricity 0.77946 Inclination 28.710 deg Right Ascension of the Ascending Node 209.170 deg Argument of Perigee 257.010 deg Mean Anomaly 0.662 deg 9-1

Epoch s 780126 18 h 19 m 50.0 GMT Right Ascension 196.47 deg Declination -5.74 deg Spin Rate 63.13 rpm In the transfer orbit, a maneuver was executed to reori ent the spin axis of the spacecraft from the injection attitude to the attitude necessary for firing the apogee boost motor (ABM). The subsequent orbital parameters were: Semi -major Ax; s 29458.648 km Eccentri city 0.77769 Inclination 28.668 deg Right Ascension of the Ascending Node 208.556 deg Argument of Perigee 257.586 deg Mean Anomaly 236.826 deg Epoch 780127 03 h 30 m 30. s 0 GMT Right Ascension 22.43 deg Declination 3.30 deg Spin Rate 62.83 rpm Prior to the firing of the apogee boost motor, two attitude tollcbup maneuvers were executed. The firing of the ABM occurred on January 27~ 1978 at 14h 53 m 54 s GMT, which placed the spacecraft in a drift orbit with an eastward drift rate of 0.123 degrees per day. The resujting orbital parameters as evaluated were: Semi-major Axis 42085.412 km Eccentricity 0.24180 Inclination 28.672 deg Right Ascension of the Ascending Node 208.435 deg Argument of Perigee 256.658 deg Mean Anomaly 178.836 deg Epoch 780127 14h 54 m 10.s0 GMT Right Ascension 22.25 deg Declination 3.38 deg Spin Rate 62.92 rpm 9-2

Events following the apogee boost motor firings included a maneuver to reorient the spacecraft spin axis to a sun angle of 120 degrees and to reduce the spacecraft spin rate from 62.8 to 4.4 rpm. 9.3 STATION ACqUISITION MANEUVERS Due to the violation of a tracking constraint at NTTF, the first station acquisition maneuver was performed at 01 h 54 m 32 s.0 on February 14, 1978 with the objective of changing the eastward drift rate of 0.15 degrees per day to a westward drift rate of 0.05 degrees per day. The predicted postmaneuver elements and the achieved post-maneuver elements are presented as evaluated at the Epoch of the maneuver: Predicted Achi eved Post-Maneuver Post-Maneuver Semi-major Axis (km) 42169.053 42166.995 Eccentricity 0.2396278 0.2395886 Inclination (deg) 28.6330 28.6333 Node (deg) 20"1.7397 207.7482 Argument of Perigee (deg) 257.3918 257.3944 Mean Anomaly (deg) 3.7637 3.7765 Drift Rate (deg/day) 0.04909 W 0.02274 W The second station acquisition maneuver was executed at 16 h 34 m 13. s 0 on July 24, 1978 to avoid a violation of the tracking constraint at the VILSPA tracking site. The predicted Post-Maneuver parameters and the achieved Post-Maneuver parameters are presented as evaluated at the epoch of the maneuver: Predicted Post-Maneuver Achieved Post-Maneuver Semi -major Axi s (km) 42154.44 42152.17 Eccentri city 0.23966 0.23962 Inclination 28.485 28.482 Node 204.319 204.303 Argument of Perigee (deg) 260.812 260.808 Mean Anomaly 4.756 4.760 Drift Rate (deg/day) 0.13269E 0.16205E 9-3

Periodically, subsequent maneuvers will be necessary to maintain the spacecraft in a position such that the tracking constraints will not be violated. 9-4

I u- ~... u ""' 'r..0 ~ o l.lj =>....-I I en QJ ~ ::::J 0') 'rl.j... 9-5

~ I 0'1 7 6... or'- o o Ra 52264 KIn. Right PERIGEE 12 Rp 32045 KIn APOGEE ascension of major axis" 23 258 0 (plot RA of sun counterc I ockw1 se from major axis) HOURS ArtER APOGEE 17 18 IUE ORBIT PLANE (V I EWED FROI ' NORTH) SCALE: 0.2 1n z 2500 KIn Figure 9-2. IUE Orbit Plane (Viewed From North)

80 70 \APOGEE 60 ii;50 w II: t!) w e z 40 o i= «> w..j w30 /~OUR BETWEEN o ~:CK MARKS 20 PERIGEE \ 1.0 I " Figure 9-3. AZIMUTH (DEGREESI GSFC Tracking Mask and Nominal Tracking Pattern

~ I OJ 50 1 (/) 40 w a: (!) 30 w Cl Z o ~ «20 > W..I W 10 _...+----4,~ VILFRA MASK + 10 DEGREES / 1 HOUR BETWEEN TICK MARKS 0~1----~----~----~----~----~----~----~--~~---'-----'-----' 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 AZIMUTH (DEGREES) Figure 9-4. VILSPA Tracking Mask and Nominal Tracking Pattern