Chapter 5 - Part 1. Orbit Perturbations. D.Mortari - AERO-423

Similar documents
NAVIGATION & MISSION DESIGN BRANCH

Section 13. Orbit Perturbation. Orbit Perturbation. Atmospheric Drag. Orbit Lifetime

ANNEX 1. DEFINITION OF ORBITAL PARAMETERS AND IMPORTANT CONCEPTS OF CELESTIAL MECHANICS

Experimental Analysis of Low Earth Orbit Satellites due to Atmospheric Perturbations

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF ORBITAL MECHANICS RELEVANT TO REMOTE SENSING

AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology

Lecture 2c: Satellite Orbits

On Sun-Synchronous Orbits and Associated Constellations

Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers. Dr Ugur GUVEN

ROCK-AROUND ORBITS. A Thesis SCOTT KENNETH BOURGEOIS

Satellite meteorology

is a revolution relative to a fixed celestial position. is the instant of transit of mean equinox relative to a fixed meridian position.

Celestial Mechanics and Satellite Orbits

Satellite Communications

Creating Satellite Orbits

Lecture 1d: Satellite Orbits

HYPER Industrial Feasibility Study Final Presentation Orbit Selection

Long-Term Evolution of High Earth Orbits: Effects of Direct Solar Radiation Pressure and Comparison of Trajectory Propagators

Orbit Representation

Third Body Perturbation

THIRD-BODY PERTURBATION USING A SINGLE AVERAGED MODEL

CHAPTER 3 SATELLITES IN FORMATION FLYING

Orbits in Geographic Context. Instantaneous Time Solutions Orbit Fixing in Geographic Frame Classical Orbital Elements

Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications

ORBIT DESIGN AND SIMULATION FOR KUFASAT NANO- SATELLITE

Orbital Mechanics! Space System Design, MAE 342, Princeton University! Robert Stengel

Relative Orbital Elements: Theory and Applications

EXAMINATION OF THE LIFETIME, EVOLUTION AND RE-ENTRY FEATURES FOR THE "MOLNIYA" TYPE ORBITS

Chapter 2: Orbits and Launching Methods

AST111, Lecture 1b. Measurements of bodies in the solar system (overview continued) Orbital elements

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Dynamics and Control of Lunisolar Perturbations for. Highly-Eccentric Earth-Orbiting Satellites

Fundamentals of Satellite technology

DE-ORBITATION STUDIES AND OPERATIONS FOR SPIRALE GTO SATELLITES

Dynamics of the Earth

MAHALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE-TRICHY QUESTION BANK UNIT I PART A

Hybrid (Ion and Chemical) GEO Stationkeeping Maneuver Planning Software

The two-body Kepler problem

Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

Seminar 3! Precursors to Space Flight! Orbital Motion!

Micro-satellite Mission Analysis: Theory Overview and Some Examples

Dynamical properties of the Solar System. Second Kepler s Law. Dynamics of planetary orbits. ν: true anomaly

EasyChair Preprint. Retrograde GEO Orbit Design Method Based on Lunar Gravity Assist for Spacecraft

Observational Astronomy - Lecture 5 The Motion of the Earth and Moon Time, Precession, Eclipses, Tides

Ossama Abdelkhalik and Daniele Mortari Department of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University,College Station, TX 77843, USA

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Orbit Definition. Reference Vector. Vernal (March) Equinox Vector. Sun Vector

Assignment-I and Its Solution

Optimization of Orbital Transfer of Electrodynamic Tether Satellite by Nonlinear Programming

ORBITAL DECAY PREDICTION AND SPACE DEBRIS IMPACT ON NANO-SATELLITES

Analytical Method for Space Debris propagation under perturbations in the geostationary ring

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

East West GEO Satellite Station-Keeping with Degraded Thruster Response

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Lunisolar Secular Resonances

COLLISION RISK ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR THE GSOC GEO SATELLITES

Space Travel on a Shoestring: CubeSat Beyond LEO

Astronomy 6570 Physics of the Planets. Precession: Free and Forced

ATTITUDE CONTROL MECHANIZATION TO DE-ORBIT SATELLITES USING SOLAR SAILS

Lecture Module 2: Spherical Geometry, Various Axes Systems

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 2 Due Tuesday, July 14, in class.

Earth-Centered, Earth-Fixed Coordinate System

SPACECRAFT FORMATION CONTROL IN VICINITY OF LIBRATION POINTS USING SOLAR SAILS

HYPER Feasibility Study

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Calculation of Earth s Dynamic Ellipticity from GOCE Orbit Simulation Data

THE DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH FIDELITY LINEARIZED J 2 MODELS FOR SATELLITE FORMATION FLYING CONTROL

Spacecraft De-Orbit Point Targeting using Aerodynamic Drag

Introduction to Satellite Orbits

1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded

TRAJECTORY OPTIMIZATION FOR SPACECRAFT COLLISION AVOIDANCE

Analysis of frozen orbits for solar sails

Design of Orbits and Spacecraft Systems Engineering. Scott Schoneman 13 November 03

MODULE 2 LECTURE NOTES 1 SATELLITES AND ORBITS

Analysis of the Briz-M Propellant Tank (35698) Fragmentation Using the Velocity Perturbations of the Fragments

Chapter 4. Satellite Position Estimation and Satellite Clock Error Analysis

CALCULATION OF POSITION AND VELOCITY OF GLONASS SATELLITE BASED ON ANALYTICAL THEORY OF MOTION

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

PW-Sat two years on orbit.

THE STABILITY OF DISPOSAL ORBITS AT SUPER-SYNCHRONOUS ALTITUDES

Spaceflight Dynamics

Research Article Variation of the Equator due to a Highly Inclined and Eccentric Disturber

SATELLITE RELATIVE MOTION PROPAGATION AND CONTROL. A Thesis PRASENJIT SENGUPTA

Orbital and Celestial Mechanics

Optimization of Eccentricity during a Two Burn Station Acquisition Sequence of a Geosynchronous Orbit

The Position of the Sun. Berthold K. P. Horn. necessary to know the position of the sun in the sky. This is particularly

Improvement of Orbits of Geostationary Satellites from Observations Over a Time Interval of Days

DEFINITION OF A REFERENCE ORBIT FOR THE SKYBRIDGE CONSTELLATION SATELLITES

SIMBOL-X: A FORMATION FLYING MISSION ON HEO FOR EXPLORING THE UNIVERSE

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 27 Oct 2018

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Ay 1 Lecture 2. Starting the Exploration

A SEMI-ANALYTICAL ORBIT PROPAGATOR PROGRAM FOR HIGHLY ELLIPTICAL ORBITS

Keplerian Elements Tutorial

Principles of Satellite Remote Sensing

Final Examination 2015

SECTION 9 ORBIT DATA - LAUNCH TRAJECTORY

Transcription:

Chapter 5 - Part 1 Orbit Perturbations D.Mortari - AERO-43

Orbital Elements Orbit normal i North Orbit plane Equatorial plane ϕ P O ω Ω i Vernal equinox Ascending node D. Mortari - AERO-43

Introduction Orbits are not Keplerian: 1) the hypothesis of spherical gravitational field is never satisfied, ) other forces are always present. Kepler solution can be considered as a basic solution, to be perturbed. dr μ General equation is: = r + a 3 p dt r a indicates the perturbation (not the disturb!) p Analytical Methods or General Perturbations (constant variations, coordinate variations, geometric) Numerical Methods or Special Perturbations (Cowell, Enke, Herrick) D. Mortari - AERO-43 3

Primary Perturbations Non spherical Earth gravitational Equatorial bulge (J ) is the dominant term Lunar and solar gravitational Causes N-S drift of geosynchronous orbits Atmospheric drag Dominant perturbation below 400 Km Solar radiation Leaking thrusters Out gassing D. Mortari - AERO-43 4

Semi-major axis variation Let ( a, a, a ) be the perturbing accelerations acting on the satellite in the radial, r s n tangential and perpendicular to the orbit plane directions. When other forces act on the satellite the orbital elements aeiωω,,,, are no longer constants, they vary out-of-plane directions. μ a perturbing acceleration, a = e + a where a = a e + a e + a e r = = = = + + ϕ p r p p r r s s n n 1 v v v a r v a r μr a r μ r μ a r μ r μ r μ Therefore we have ( ) with time. We want the equations for their variations. The method of variation of parameters is used to obtain the equations of motion. As an example, consider the semi-major axis. Let e, e, e be the unit-vectors in the radial, tangential, and ( ) r s n a a = rar + rϕa μ ( ) ( ra r a ) D. Mortari - AERO-43 5 s r s

Semi-major axis variation r a The equation was: a = ( ra r + rϕ as) μ From angular momentum we can compute rϕ ( 1+ ecosϕ) ( 1+ ecosϕ) r ϕ h μ rϕ= = = μ p = + e ϕ r r p p sin sin si ( 1 cos ) From the expression of the radius we can compute r dr pe ϕ r e ϕ re = = ϕ= ϕ= dt p n ϕ μ μ ( 1+ ecosϕ ) = esinϕ p p p a μ substituting a = esin ϕ ar + ( 1+ ecos ϕ) a μ p a a = esin ϕ ar + ( 1+ ecos ϕ) a h s s D. Mortari - AERO-43 6

Lagrange s Planetary Equations da esinϕ a 1 e a = a [ sin (1 cos ) ] r + as = e ϕ ar + + e ϕ as dt n 1 e nr h de 1 e sinϕ 1 e a (1 e ) = ar + r a s dt na nea r dm 0 1 r 1 e (1 e ) r dn = cos ϕ ar 1 sin a s t dt na a e nae + ϕ a(1 e ) dt di r cos( ω+ϕ) dω rsin( ω+ϕ) = a and dt na 1 e n = a 1 n dt na e sini dω 1 e + ecosϕ rcotisin( ω+ϕ) = cos ϕ a + sin ϕa a dt nae 1 ecos + ϕ h r s n D. Mortari - AERO-43 7

Observations From these equations we can corroborate some of our previous conclusions on orbit changes. From the da / dt equation we see that with a tangential impulse the maximum change in a occurs when an impulse is applied at perigee, where (1+ecosϕ) is max. From the di / dt equation we see that the maximum change in the inclination occurs with an out of plane impulse at the equator, where cos(ω+ϕ) is max. From the dω / dt equation the maximum change in the right ascension occurs with an out-of-plane impulse at the antinode, where sin(ω+ϕ) is max. For eccentricity corrections, tangential impulses at perigee or apogee are twice as efficient as the radial impulses at ϕ=π/ or ϕ=3π/ (see next slide). Corrections of semi-major axis and eccentricity are done together. D. Mortari - AERO-43 8

Eccentricity term de 1 e sinϕ 1 e a (1 e ) = ar + r a dt na nea r substituting r = a(1 e ) we obtain: 1 + ecos ϕ de 1 e sinϕ 1 e 1 e = ar + 1 ecos a dt na nea + ϕ 1+ ecosϕ de 1 e sinϕ 1 e 1 1 e = ar + cos a dt na na ϕ+ e e(1+ ecos ϕ) de 1 e e + cos ϕ = (sin ϕ ) ar + cos ϕ+ as dt na 1+ ecosϕ de 1 (for e 0) we have = ( arsin ϕ+ ascos ϕ) dt na D. Mortari - AERO-43 9 s s s

Non Spherical Earth Gravitational Forces a = U, where U = gravitational potential n n n μ RE R U = 1 Jn Pn cosφ + Pnm cosφ Cnm cosλ+ Snm sinλ r n= r n= m= 1 r φ = latitude, λ = longitude R E = Earth radius E ( ) ( )( ) P n, P nm are Legendre polynomials of the 1 st and nd kind J = 1.086 10 and J, J,, C, S O(10 ) 3 6 3 4 nm nm Thus, J is the dominant perturbation except for resonant or repeating ground track or compatible orbits. These orbits are characterized with an orbit period that is a rational number times the Earth rotation period, i.e., m T = TE nt = mt n E D. Mortari - AERO-43 10

Non Spherical Earth Gravitational Forces The orbital elements are no longer constant, they vary with time. We have three types of variations: 1) Short period - vary with orbital period. ) Long period - varies with period from days to months. 3) Secular - linear with time. (Period is the period of the perigee rotation) D. Mortari - AERO-43 11

Element Variations 1.6 1.4 1. 1 Secular Short period Long period Sum 0.8 0.6 0.4 0. 0-0. 0 100 00 300 400 500 600 Time D. Mortari - AERO-43 1

Definitions Mean or averaged elements: those obtained from averaging the elements over one orbit or from using the averaged disturbing potential. These are the elements usually provided by Space Command. Osculating elements: those elements are obtained from computing the orbital elements from position and velocity using the two body equations. They are instantaneous values. D. Mortari - AERO-43 13

Equatorial Bulge (J ) Effect Disturbing potential: r R r = r + 3 r Lagrange s Planetary Equations in terms of the disturbing potential R are: = = + dt na M dt na e ω na e M da R de b R b R 3 4 0 0 di 1 R cosi R dω 1 R = + = dt nabsin i Ω nabsin i ω dt nabsin i i dω cosi R b R dm 0 R b R = + = 3 4 dt nabsini i na e e dt na a na e e μ 3 J = 1.083 10 μ RE R= J P( cos φ) where 1 r r P ( cos φ ) = 3sin ( ϕ+ω) sin i 1 D. Mortari - AERO-43 14

Equatorial Bulge (J ) Effect The sin(λ), cos(λ) terms vary as the orbit frequency. These are short period variations that occur in all the orbital elements. They do not affect long term behavior. To obtain the long term effects average the RHS of the equation over one orbit. Since the only terms varying rapidly one can average the disturbing potential. T 0 μ R where E 3sin ( ) sin 1 1 1 R = Rdt R J i T = ω+ϕ r r rdϕ= hdt(the angular momentum integral), and T= n π r nr R = Rdϕ= J E i 0 3/ π h 4(1 e ) (3sin ) π n D. Mortari - AERO-43 15

Equatorial Bulge (J ) Effect da de di = 0, = 0, = 0, dt dt dt dω 3 RE dω 3 RE = J ncos i, = J n 5cos i 1 dt p dt 4 p dm 3 RE n= = n0 1 + J ( 3sin i) 1 e dt 4 p ( ) Thus, the primary effects due to J are the nodal precession, argument of perigee precession, and the change in period. Periods: Anomalistic - perigee to perigee. Nodal - equator crossing to equator crossing. D. Mortari - AERO-43 16 π (Anomalistic period) TA = n π (Nodal period) TN = ω+ n

J Effects 0 Altitude = 400 km 15 Perigee drift rate 10 critical inclination 5 0 0 0 40 60 80 100 10 140 160 180-5 Rt. Ascension precession rate -10 D. Mortari - AERO-43 17 Inclination - deg

Dominant Perturbations on LEO R Atmospheric drag - important below 600 Km Equatorial Bulge 3 3 a sin i 1 = n RE J r 3 dω 1 R = dt nabsin i i 3 RE Ω= J cos n i a(1 e ) 3 RE ω= J n i 4 a(1 e ) (5cos 1) μ where n= and J 3 = 1.08 10 a Critical inclination implies ω = 0 = 63.4 5cos i = 1 i= = 116.6 D. Mortari - AERO-43 18 3

Leo Satellite (MIR) i = 51.6 Period 91 min 350 Km D. Mortari - AERO-43 19

Perturbation effects at GEO Longitude dependent gravitational forces cause a longitude drift. Two stable points, 75 E, 5 E East-West station-keeping requirements. Sun and Moon cause an oscillation of the inclination. Rate is about 0.7 deg/year. Amplitude is 14 degrees. Period is 57 years. North-South station-keeping requirements require considerably more fuel than East-West station-keeping D. Mortari - AERO-43 0

Geosynchronous i = 0.3 (TDRS-7) Perigee: 35,774 Apogee: 35,795 Intelsat F7-6 D. Mortari - AERO-43 1

Equatorial Bulge (J ) Effect Anomalistic period is T A = π π, Nodal period is TN n = n + ω 3 RE For circular orbits: n+ω= n0 1 + J 3 4sin i p Sun Synchronous Orbits ( ) Orbits for which the orbit plane orientation with respect to the Earth-Sun line is fixed. Equator crossings occur at the same local time each orbit. Defined by ΔΩ = 360/365.5 deg/day. 3 RE 4 1 a(1 e ) J ncosi cosi 1.7 10 a(1 e ) n RE Ω= = D. Mortari - AERO-43

Sunsynchronous (Landsat 7) i = 98.8 Period 98 min 700 Km D. Mortari - AERO-43 3

Sunsynchronous Orbits Ω 1deg/day Orbit plane maintains the same orientation with respect to the Sun, Satellite crosses the equator at the same local time each day View at the same altitude at the same local time (same sun rays angles or illuminating conditions) D. Mortari - AERO-43 4

Sun Synchronous Orbits 106 105 104 Inclination (deg) 103 10 101 100 99 98 97 e=0 96 00 400 600 800 1000 100 1400 1600 1800 000 Altitude (Km) - km D. Mortari - AERO-43 5