INTEGRABILITY ALONG A LINE FOR A CLASS

Similar documents
REMARKS ON INCOMPLETENESS OF {eix-*}, NON- AVERAGING SETS, AND ENTIRE FUNCTIONS1 R. M. REDHEFFER

r log+ 1 F(t) 1 jt ^

Bernstein-Szegö Inequalities in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION

THE ZERO-DISTRIBUTION AND THE ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF A FOURIER INTEGRAL. Haseo Ki and Young One Kim

A CONVERGENCE CRITERION FOR FOURIER SERIES

en-. כ Some recent results on the distribution of zeros of real, 1822 Fourier. 1937, Ålander, Pólya, Wiman

238 H. S. WILF [April

SMOOTHNESS OF FUNCTIONS GENERATED BY RIESZ PRODUCTS

AN EXTREMUM PROPERTY OF SUMS OF EIGENVALUES' HELMUT WIELANDT

A NOTE ON A BASIS PROBLEM

2 K cos nkx + K si" nkx) (1.1)

CLASSES OF L'-CONVERGENCE OF FOURIER AND FOURIER-STIELTJES SERIES CASLAV V. STANOJEVIC

Application of the Euler s gamma function to a problem related to F. Carlson s uniqueness theorem

SOME FUNCTION CLASSES RELATED TO THE CLASS OF CONVEX FUNCTIONS

(1.2) Jjexp/(z) 2 \dz\ < expj i \f'(z)\2 do(z) J (q = 1).

SOBOLEV S INEQUALITY FOR RIESZ POTENTIALS OF FUNCTIONS IN NON-DOUBLING MORREY SPACES

A NOTE ON ENTIRE AND MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS

a» [r^ivrrwr'c.)*(-) (,-)X*r

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

The zeros of the derivative of the Riemann zeta function near the critical line

Remarks on the Rademacher-Menshov Theorem

ON JAMES' QUASI-REFLEXIVE BANACH SPACE

A WEIGHTED NORM INEQUALITY FOR

J2 e-*= (27T)- 1 / 2 f V* 1 '»' 1 *»

Clarkson Inequalities With Several Operators

ON CONVERGENCE OF STOCHASTIC PROCESSES

A COMPLEMENTARY TRIANGLE INEQUALITY IN HILBERT AND BANACH SPACES J. B. DIAZ AND F. T. METCALF1

ON THE DENSITY OF SOME SEQUENCES OF INTEGERS P. ERDOS

Ht) = - {/(* + t)-f(x-t)}, e(t) = - I^-á«.

ON THE TOTAL VARIATION OF SOLUTIONS OF THE BOUNDED VARIATION MOMENT PROBLEM1

ON THE NUMBER OF POSITIVE SUMS OF INDEPENDENT RANDOM VARIABLES

ON THE HURWITZ ZETA-FUNCTION

SOME THEOREMS ON MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS

SEPARABILITY OF STOCHASTIC PROCESSES

Bounded point derivations on R p (X) and approximate derivatives

Uniform convergence of N-dimensional Walsh Fourier series

A HARNACK INEQUALITY FOR NONLINEAR EQUATIONS

ON AN INEQUALITY OF KOLMOGOROV AND STEIN

ON THE DIVERGENCE OF FOURIER SERIES

ON THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF REAL ROOTS OF A RANDOM ALGEBRAIC EQUATION

ON THE EXTENSION OF A FUNCTIONAL INEQUALITY OF S. BERNSTEIN TO NON-ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS 1

P. L. DUREN AND A. L. SHIELDS

I ƒii - [ Jj ƒ(*) \'dzj'.

SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR THE CONVERGENCE OF NEWTON'S METHOD IN COMPLEX BANACH SPACES1

OSCILLATORY SINGULAR INTEGRALS ON L p AND HARDY SPACES

TWO ERGODIC THEOREMS FOR CONVEX COMBINATIONS OF COMMUTING ISOMETRIES1 - S. A. McGRATH

THE NORM OF A HERMITIAN ELEMENT IN A BANACH ALGEBRA

ON THE ZEROS OF SUCCESSIVE DERIVATIVES OF INTEGRAL FUNCTIONS

SOME TAÜBERIAN PROPERTIES OF HOLDER TRANSFORMATIONS AMNON JAKIMOVSKI1

A NOTE ON TRIGONOMETRIC MATRICES

NOTE ON A SERIES OF PRODUCTS OF THREE LEGENDRE POLYNOMIALS

(1) 0 á per(a) Í f[ U, <=i

ON THE OSCILLATION OF THE DERIVATIVES OF A PERIODIC FUNCTION

CONVEXITY OF INTEGRAL MEANS OF SUBHARMONIC FUNCTIONS

si(t) = E /("/»)( w V(i - ty->, re = 1, 2, 3,. v=0 \ V /

UNIFORM INTEGRABILITY AND THE POINTWTSE ERGODIC THEOREM

lim f f(kx)dp(x) = cmf

TAUBERIAN THEOREM FOR HARMONIC MEAN OF STIELTJES TRANSFORMS AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO LINEAR DIFFUSIONS

EXTENSIONS OF THE BLOCH PÓLYA THEOREM ON THE NUMBER OF REAL ZEROS OF POLYNOMIALS

UNIFORM BOUNDS FOR BESSEL FUNCTIONS

THE MAXIMUM OF SUMS OF STABLE RANDOM VARIABLES

AN INEQUALITY OF TURAN TYPE FOR JACOBI POLYNOMIALS

GENERATING FUNCTIONS FOR THE JACOBI POLYNOMIAL M. E. COHEN

Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Exponential sums II: the Kuzmin and Montgomery-Vaughan estimates

FOURIER COEFFICIENTS OF BOUNDED FUNCTIONS 1

("-1/' .. f/ L) I LOCAL BOUNDEDNESS OF NONLINEAR, MONOTONE OPERA TORS. R. T. Rockafellar. MICHIGAN MATHEMATICAL vol. 16 (1969) pp.

Accumulation constants of iterated function systems with Bloch target domains

ON THE STABILITY OF EXPONENTIAL BASES IN L2(-7r,7r)

(3) 6(t) = /(* /(* ~ t), *(0 - /(* + 0 ~ /(* ~t)-l,

CONSEQUENCES OF POWER SERIES REPRESENTATION

K. Johnson Department of Mathematics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada D. Patterson

LINEAR FUNCTIONALS ON CERTAIN BANACH SPACES. e. J. mcshane

ASYMPTOTIC DISTRIBUTION OF THE MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE SUM OF INDEPENDENT RANDOM VARIABLES

ON THE LOCAL EXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONAL-DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

BÍ(z) = è/f>/n)c..,(l

A NOTE ON CONTRACTIVE MAPPINGS

EXISTENCE THEOREMS FOR SOLUTIONS OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF NON-INTEGRAL ORDER*

ON A SOJOURN TIME PROBLEM IN THE THEORY OF STOCHASTIC PROCESSES(1)

Density results for frames of exponentials

NOTE ON SOME GAP THEOREMS

n»i \ v f(x + h)-f(x-h)

On distribution functions of ξ(3/2) n mod 1

BANK-LAINE FUNCTIONS WITH SPARSE ZEROS

ZAREMBA'S CONJECTURE AND SUMS OF THE DIVISOR FUNCTION

2. Let S stand for an increasing sequence of distinct positive integers In ;}

NEW GENERATING FUNCTIONS FOR CLASSICAL POLYNOMIALS1. J. w. brown

Exercise 1. Let f be a nonnegative measurable function. Show that. where ϕ is taken over all simple functions with ϕ f. k 1.

International Competition in Mathematics for Universtiy Students in Plovdiv, Bulgaria 1994

Two-Step Iteration Scheme for Nonexpansive Mappings in Banach Space

On the mean values of an analytic function

THE DIOPHANTINE EQUATION f(x) = g(y)

COMBINATORIAL DIMENSION OF FRACTIONAL CARTESIAN PRODUCTS

1.1. Introduction. An entire function F is said to have exponential type zero if

ON THE QUASI MONOTONE AND ALMOST INCREASING SEQUENCES. 1. Introduction

HADAMARD'S THREE CIRCLES THEOREM

J2 cnanzn < f{z) in E. n=l

Zeros of the Riemann Zeta-Function on the Critical Line

INFINITE RADICALS IN THE COMPLEX PLANE1

HARMONIC ANALYSIS. Date:

Some Recent Results and Problems in the Theory of Value-Distribution

Transcription:

INTEGRABILITY ALONG A LINE FOR A CLASS OF ENTIRE FUNCTIONS BY R. P. BOAS, JR.(l) 1. Introduction. Duffin and Schaeffer have recently shown [5] that if f(z) is an entire function of exponential type c<ir such that (i.i) then for some K (independent i/(x»)i2<*, 00 of/(z)) (1.2) C\f(x)\*dx A- /(X ) 2 " 00-00 provided that {X } is an increasing sequence of real numbers such that X n\ <L and Xn+i X ^5>0. This is the L2-analogue of the theorem, proved in different ways by Duffin and Schaeffer [6] and by B. Levin [8], that f(x) is bounded if {/(X )} is bounded ; the cases of the two theorems when \n = n are due respectively to Plancherel and Pólya [il] and Cartwright [3]. The object of this paper is to replace (1.1), (1.2) respectively by (1.3) *( /(X») )<», (1.4) f 4>(H\f(x)\)dxiKZ<f>(\f(\n)\), " oo X. with constants H and K independent of/(z), for a wide class of functions 4>{t) which includes /" for p>0. The proof is quite different from that given by Duffin and Schaeffer for <j>(t) =/2; it involves a combination of ideas used by Plancherel and Pólya for X =w, < >(t)=tv; an interpolation formula of Valiron; and Levin's estimates for a product with zeros at the X. The precise statement of the theorem is as follows. Theorem. Let f(z) be an entire function of exponential type such that (1.5) lim sup y1 log \f(iy)f( iy) \ = 2c < 2t. Let {X } be a sequence of complex numbers, with\0 = 0, \ «^L, X +m X >2ô>0 (m^o). Let ß(x) be a nondecreasing function such that \ß(x+L) Presented to the Society, February 23, 1952; received by the editors December 20, 1951. (') The Author is a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation. 191

192 R. P. BOAS [September -ß(x-L)\ ^b and (if L<\) \ß(x+\/2)-ß{x-\/2)\ &è. Let <f>(x) be either (i) an increasing convex nonnegative function or (ii) an increasing nonnegative continuous function such that <j>(0) 0, <j>( o ) = oo, <f>(x)/x decreases, and (1.6) <t>(xy) ^ <j>(x)<j>(y). Then if XI-«> 0( /(Xn) ) converges, there are numbers H and K, depending only on c, L, 5, b, and <j>, such that (1.7) C"rtH\f(x) )dß(x) #( f(k) ); in case (i), K^b; in case (ii), i/^1. If 0(x) = xp, we have case (i) ii p^l, case (ii) if 0<p<l. In case (i) we can also, for example, take <j>(x)=erllx for x near 0 and it follows that if y^ exp { 1/ /(X ) } converges, then /" exp { H/\f(x)\ \dx converges for some H, a result which is new even when \n n. Functions satisfying (1.6) have been discussed by Cooper [4], who showed (in particular) that they satisfy <j>(x) ^Axa for x near 0. A converse theorem, when <}>(t)=tp, was given by Plancherel and Pólya [il]: the convergence of (1.8) f *{ /(*) )dx J -00 implies that of (1.9) *{«~«/M } 71= 00 assuming only that the A are real and \ +m XB >25>0, m^o, with no restriction on the type of/(z) (except that it is finite). It is possible to modify the direct theorem, by using a Stieltjes integral instead of a sum on the right of (1.7), so that it includes this converse theorem. However, the converse actually holds for a wider class of functions <f> than that considered in the theorem, namely when <f>(t) is an increasing non-negative convex function of log /. A proof can be given by a modification of Plancherel and Pólya's method, but I shall not give it here. I note only the lemma that /0O f% 00 *{«-''»' /i> + iy)\ }dx^ I <t>{\f(x)\}dx, -00 «^-oo and the form of the final result for real X : 0{e-<5 /(Xn) } ^kj *{ /(*) I }dx,

1952] INTEGRABILITY FOR A CLASS OF ENTIRE FUNCTIONS 193 where/(z) is of type c and K depends only on 5. 2. An interpolation formula. We need the following lemmas. Lemma 1. Let G(z) = zjj (1 - *A»)(1 -»A-«), where {X } satisfies the conditions of the theorem. Then G(z) is an entire function of exponential type ir, satisfying (2.1) \G(x+iy)\ A(\x\ + l)»>, M=s3 ; (2.2) G'(\k) ^ C(l + X, )-«-», wâere j4 a«d C ( > 0) depend only on 5 <zw L. Lemma 1 was proved by Levin [8]; less sharp estimates which would, however, be entirely adequate for our present purposes (and also for proving the boundedness of f(x) when {/(X )} is bounded) were given much earlier by Levinson [l0]. Lemma 2. For \ z X >S/2, and each positive a-, (2.3) exp {w( sin 6 - <r)} / G(reí9) =0(1). Lemma 2, which is true whenever {X } has density 1 and satisfies the separation condition of the theorem, follows from a theorem proved by Levinson [9, pp. 92-93]. We may suppose instead of (1.5) that lim sup ;y _1 log /( y) =c<7r as y >+ oo, since otherwise we can consider f(z)eiaz with a suitable real a; and then it follows by a Phragmen-Lindelöf argument that (2.4) \f(reie) = 0(er(c' sin 6 +,, cos»l>), r >oo, for some c'<tt and finite d, and each d. Now let g be an integer, not less than 4L+ 3, and put _, pan ktla G(z)f(\k) G'(\k)(z-\k)[ G'(\k){z-\k)\\J / y where the prime indicates the omission of the term with k=0. Let P(z) be the sum of the first g+1 terms of the Maclaurin series of zf(z)/g(z), and put f(z) - H(z) - G{z)P{z)/z la(z) = - z"g{z) In the first place, since <f>(x)1 o whenxf o, the convergence of S^( /(X ) ) implies that the numbers/(xn) are bounded; hence by (2.2) and our choice of q, the series for H(z) converges uniformly in any bounded region ; hence H{z)

194 R. P. BOAS [September is an entire function taking the values /(X/t) at z=\k, k^o. Since f(z) G(z)P(z)/z has a (g+l)-fold zero at 0, \[/(z) is also entire, and it is easy to verify that it is actually of exponential type. We next estimate i /(reie) more precisely for large r and 0 near ±ir/2. We have *(*)! =s /(«) z"g(z) + H(z) z"g(z) + = ri + r2 + T, Then T3 = o(l) since P(z) is of degree at most q. For T\ we have by (2.3) and (2.4) T\ ^fer(c'l8in 9 +< C03 9 )-Tr( 3in 9 -o-) where /3>0, and AÍ depends on f(z), <j, and 0, while <j is arbitrarily small; thus T\ is bounded on arg z = Q if 0 is so near ±w/2 that j31 sin 0 + d cos 0 +o-<0. For T2 we have by (2.2) (2.5) T, i R Y, (1 + X. )4L+1 where R is a constant, and this is bounded for \y\ ^ 2L, say, since 3(X») ^L andg^4l + 3. Hence 1^(2) is an entire function of exponential type bounded on four rays, any two consecutive ones of which make an angle of less than ir, and hence by a Phragmen-Lindelöf theorem \p(z) is bounded everywhere and so is a constant. Finally, this constant must be zero, since for z = iy, \y\ >, T\ ->0, Ti >0, and Ti >0 because \iy Xt >» uniformly in (2.5). Thus we have the formula (2.6) /(*) = ' GW/(Xt) G'(X,)(2 - Xt)(0 + a-'g(z)/>(z), which is due to Valiron [12]. (Valiron's hypotheses are somewhat different, and it is somewhat easier to follow the lines of Valiron's proof with our hypotheses than to verify that our hypotheses imply his.) The same formula was established by Ahiezer [l] by another method under more general hypotheses which are irrelevant for our present purposes; the same degree of generality can be attained by Valiron's method by using a lemma of Boas [2, p. 479]. 3. Proof of the theorem. We shall now use for the first time the fact that the constants A and C of Lemma 1 depend only on L and ô and are otherwise independent of the position of the X. Let m be an integer and put Xim)=X +m Xm, so that X^^O, Xlm) n\ 2L, and Xim)-Xim) ^25. Let Gm(z) denote the function of Lemma 1,

1952] INTEGRABILITY FOR A CLASS OF ENTIRE FUNCTIONS 195 formed with \^ instead of X. Then Gm(z) satisfies (2.1) and (2.2), with L replaced by 2L, A and C being independent of m. Let hm(z) =/(z+xm) sin«r z, where now g^8l + 3 in case (i), and in case (ii) a is so large that $( 8L+2~S) converges; the latter choice is possible because <f>(x) SAxa for small x and some positive a. If y\ is so small that qr]<tr c, hm(z) is of type less than w, and \hmq^)\ g /(Xn+m) =0(1). Hence (2.6) applies to hm(z). Since P(z) is of degree q at most, and hm(z) has a g-fold zero at 0, P(z) =0 in this case and we have (3.1) **(*) = Z' Gm(z)hm(\k ) m(x ft )(S - \x<r>/ X * ) Í-L-Y. We may suppose that L^ 1 and?; < 1/L. By the maximum principle, if T is the boundary of the square of side 4L with center at the origin and sides parallel to the coordinate axes, and jum is the maximum of /(z+xm) for z inside T, tm^maxr /(z+xm). On T, [sin5 z[ has a positive minimum, I/7; and A(Xim)) ^ /(X*+m) ;so (3.2) Mm : 7C-1 Z' ma i=-oo r Gm(z) XT' If zer and z-xf'l fcl, by (2.1) we have i/(x,+j (i + xri)lfi(3^ x<r> i" max r Gm(z) z - x<r» ^ (3L)8t. On the other hand, if zgt and z-x m) <1, then Gm(z)/(z-\f)) is regular on r, and the maximum of its absolute value does not exceed max max Gr z-h>i = i by (2.1). Hence we have Gm(z) z w ^ A(3L+ 1)8L (3.3) V-m ^ N T,' I /(X*-+m) I bk (m) where &im, = (l+ Xim) )8L+1 Xim) -'' and ^depends only on L and 5 (not on m). Now for k^o, \\(tm)\ ^5 and fc + 2L^ Xim) ^k~2l; hence &*"0 = (1 + + 2L)SL+\k - 2jL)" (m), 8 +l -g 4* á (1 + 47.) 5, and so, by our choice of g, we have &» ^ 6*, where >,t is independent Z&* converges in case (i), ^4>(bk) converges in case (ii). I k\ > 2L; I k\ g 2L; of m and

196 R. P. BOAS [September Thus from (3.3) we have (with >0 = 0) (3.4) Mm g N /(Xi+m) bk = N /(Xn) k_ fc= oo n= oc From this the theorem follows easily. Let l/iï=./vz-» bk. Then in case (i) we have by the properties of convex functions [7, p. 72] hence (00 \ 00 B Z I /(*») I M-») á A Z A^ _m<k I /(Xn) ); n= oo / 7i= oo (3.5) *(#,) g *( /(X,) ), m= oo n= oo and r 0(ff i /(*) i )#(*) ^ v oo m= oo «J Z, oo r «(A i /(*+») i )dp(*) =á o Z <*>(# max I /(* + m) I ) m= oo 00 ~ 'L'è.x^L = & Z ^(ff max I /(* + ^m + W Xm) ) m=-oo -ISlgi 00 00 ^ i Z «KffO á b Z *( I /(X.) )- m= co which is the conclusion of the theorem in case (i). In case (ii) we return to (3.4) and now we have, first since <f>(x)/x decreases [7, p. 83] and then by (1.6), CO 00 *(/*-.) ^ Z 4>(A71 f(k) &_«) âz*(l n= oo n= oo 7i= oo /(^n) I )4>(bn-m)<KN), Z GO ^ *(#) Z *( /(x ) ) Z *(* ), m= oo n= oo wi= oo and the conclusion follows as before by starting from this inequality instead of (3.5). References 1. N. I. Ahiezer, Ob inter-polirovanii tsetyh Irantsendentnyh funktsil konechnot stepeni (On the interpolation of entire transcendental functions of finite degree), Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR. N.S. vol. 65 (1949) pp. 781-784. 2. R. P. Boas, Jr., The growth of analytic functions, Duke Math. J. vol. 13 (1946) pp. 471 481.

1952] INTEGRABILITY FOR A CLASS OF ENTIRE FUNCTIONS 197 3. M. L. Cartwright, On certain integral functions of order one, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. vol. 7 (1936) pp. 46-55. 4. R. Cooper, The converse of the Cauchy-Holder inequality and the solutions of the inequality g(x+y) úg(x)+g{y), Proc. London Math. Soc. (2) vol. 26 (1927) pp. 415-432. 5. R. J. Duffin and A. C. Schaeffer, A class of nonharmonic Fourier series, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. vol. 72 (1952) pp. 341-366. 6. -, Power series with bounded coefficients, Amer. J. Math. vol. 67 (1945) pp. 141-154. 7. G. H. Hardy, J. E. Littlewood, and G. Pólya, Inequalities, Cambridge, 1934. 8. B. Levin, O funktsiyah konechnoï stepeni, ogranichennyh na posledovatelnosti tochek {On functions of finite degree, bounded on a sequence of points), Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR. N.S. vol. 65 (1949) pp. 265-268. 9. N. Levinson, Gap and density theorems, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloquium Publications, vol. 26. New York, 1940. 10. -, On a problem of Pólya, Amer. J. Math. vol. 58 (1936) pp. 791-798. 11. M. Plancherel and G. Pólya, Fonctions entières et intégrales de Fourier multiples, Comment. Math. Helv. vol. 9 (1937) pp. 224-248; vol. 10 (1938) pp. 110-163. 12. G. Valiron, Sur la formule d'interpolation de Lagrange, Bull. Sei. Math. (2) vol. 49 (1925) pp. 181-192, 203-224. Northwestern Evanston, University, III.