Lecture 15: MOS Transistor models: Body effects, SPICE models. Context. In the last lecture, we discussed the modes of operation of a MOS FET:

Similar documents
EEC 118 Lecture #2: MOSFET Structure and Basic Operation. Rajeevan Amirtharajah University of California, Davis Jeff Parkhurst Intel Corporation

ECE 342 Electronic Circuits. Lecture 6 MOS Transistors

Lecture 10 MOSFET (III) MOSFET Equivalent Circuit Models

Integrated Circuits & Systems

6.012 Electronic Devices and Circuits Spring 2005

Lecture 10 MOSFET (III) MOSFET Equivalent Circuit Models

ECE 342 Electronic Circuits. 3. MOS Transistors

Introduction and Background

The Devices. Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective. Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje Nikolic. July 30, 2002

MOS Transistor I-V Characteristics and Parasitics

MOS Transistors. Prof. Krishna Saraswat. Department of Electrical Engineering Stanford University Stanford, CA

MOS Transistor Theory

Chapter 4 Field-Effect Transistors

ECE 497 JS Lecture - 12 Device Technologies

Lecture 11: MOS Transistor

Chapter 13 Small-Signal Modeling and Linear Amplification

MOSFET: Introduction

Practice 3: Semiconductors

EE105 - Fall 2005 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits

ECE 546 Lecture 10 MOS Transistors

Metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors (2 lectures)

Device Models (PN Diode, MOSFET )

Lecture 12: MOSFET Devices

EE105 Fall 2014 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits. NMOS Transistor Capacitances: Saturation Region

Microelectronic Devices and Circuits Lecture 13 - Linear Equivalent Circuits - Outline Announcements Exam Two -

MOS Transistor Properties Review

Device Models (PN Diode, MOSFET )

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

Lecture 4: CMOS Transistor Theory

EE105 - Fall 2006 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits

EE5311- Digital IC Design

ELEC 3908, Physical Electronics, Lecture 23. The MOSFET Square Law Model

Figure 1: MOSFET symbols.

Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective. Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje Nikolic. The Devices. July 30, Devices.

Lecture 3: CMOS Transistor Theory

The Devices. Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective. Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje Nikolic. July 30, 2002

The Devices: MOS Transistors

Lecture 12: MOS Capacitors, transistors. Context

CMPEN 411 VLSI Digital Circuits. Lecture 03: MOS Transistor

ECE315 / ECE515 Lecture-2 Date:

MOS Transistor Theory

Lecture 11: J-FET and MOSFET

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

Lecture 04 Review of MOSFET

Quantitative MOSFET. Step 1. Connect the MOS capacitor results for the electron charge in the inversion layer Q N to the drain current.

Chapter 2 CMOS Transistor Theory. Jin-Fu Li Department of Electrical Engineering National Central University Jungli, Taiwan

FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTORS

Electronic Devices and Circuits Lecture 18 - Single Transistor Amplifier Stages - Outline Announcements. Notes on Single Transistor Amplifiers

Final Examination EE 130 December 16, 1997 Time allotted: 180 minutes

Lecture Outline. ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals. Review: MOS Capacitor with External Bias

Fundamentals of the Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor

Today s lecture. EE141- Spring 2003 Lecture 4. Design Rules CMOS Inverter MOS Transistor Model

Lecture 13 MOSFET as an amplifier with an introduction to MOSFET small-signal model and small-signal schematics. Lena Peterson

Circuits. L2: MOS Models-2 (1 st Aug. 2013) B. Mazhari Dept. of EE, IIT Kanpur. B. Mazhari, IITK. G-Number

! MOS Capacitances. " Extrinsic. " Intrinsic. ! Lumped Capacitance Model. ! First Order Capacitor Summary. ! Capacitance Implications

SECTION: Circle one: Alam Lundstrom. ECE 305 Exam 5 SOLUTIONS: Spring 2016 April 18, 2016 M. A. Alam and M.S. Lundstrom Purdue University

HW 5 posted due in two weeks Lab this week Midterm graded Project to be launched in week 7

Lecture 23: Negative Resistance Osc, Differential Osc, and VCOs

ECE-343 Test 2: Mar 21, :00-8:00, Closed Book. Name : SOLUTION

! PN Junction. ! MOS Transistor Topology. ! Threshold. ! Operating Regions. " Resistive. " Saturation. " Subthreshold (next class)

Electronic Circuits 1. Transistor Devices. Contents BJT and FET Characteristics Operations. Prof. C.K. Tse: Transistor devices

EE 330. Lecture 35. Parasitic Capacitances in MOS Devices

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

The Devices. Jan M. Rabaey

MOSFET Capacitance Model

Lecture 9 MOSFET(II) MOSFET I V CHARACTERISTICS(contd.)

Charge-Storage Elements: Base-Charging Capacitance C b

ELEC 3908, Physical Electronics, Lecture 26. MOSFET Small Signal Modelling

EEC 116 Lecture #3: CMOS Inverters MOS Scaling. Rajeevan Amirtharajah University of California, Davis Jeff Parkhurst Intel Corporation

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY School of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Operation and Modeling of. The MOS Transistor. Second Edition. Yannis Tsividis Columbia University. New York Oxford OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

MOSFET Physics: The Long Channel Approximation

EE 560 MOS TRANSISTOR THEORY

EE105 - Fall 2006 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits. Some Administrative Issues

Electronics Fets and Mosfets Prof D C Dube Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

Introduction to CMOS VLSI. Chapter 2: CMOS Transistor Theory. Harris, 2004 Updated by Li Chen, Outline

ECE321 Electronics I

Chapter 6: Field-Effect Transistors

Section 12: Intro to Devices

MOS Transistor Theory MOSFET Symbols Current Characteristics of MOSFET. MOS Symbols and Characteristics. nmos Enhancement Transistor

The Gradual Channel Approximation for the MOSFET:

Lecture 37: Frequency response. Context

University of Pennsylvania Department of Electrical Engineering. ESE 570 Midterm Exam March 14, 2013 FORMULAS AND DATA

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

Frequency Response Prof. Ali M. Niknejad Prof. Rikky Muller

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

Field-Effect (FET) transistors

ESE370: Circuit-Level Modeling, Design, and Optimization for Digital Systems. Today. Refinement. Last Time. No Field. Body Contact

P. R. Nelson 1 ECE418 - VLSI. Midterm Exam. Solutions

Review of Band Energy Diagrams MIS & MOS Capacitor MOS TRANSISTORS MOSFET Capacitances MOSFET Static Model

EE 435. Lecture 37. Parasitic Capacitances in MOS Devices. String DAC Parasitic Capacitances

Lecture 210 Physical Aspects of ICs (12/15/01) Page 210-1

Digital Electronics Part II - Circuits

Biasing the CE Amplifier

CMOS INVERTER. Last Lecture. Metrics for qualifying digital circuits. »Cost» Reliability» Speed (delay)»performance

Long Channel MOS Transistors

The Devices. Devices

ELEN0037 Microelectronic IC Design. Prof. Dr. Michael Kraft

Microelectronic Devices and Circuits Lecture 9 - MOS Capacitors I - Outline Announcements Problem set 5 -

Section 12: Intro to Devices

Transcription:

Lecture 15: MOS Transistor models: Body effects, SPICE models Context In the last lecture, we discussed the modes of operation of a MOS FET: oltage controlled resistor model I- curve (Square-Law Model) Saturation model In this lecture, we will: add a correction due to the changing depletion region, called the body effect Produce small signal models for the FET and look at how MOS Transistors are modeled in SPICE 1

Reading Today, and Friday we will finish the material from chapter 4. Then we look at the analog characteristics of simple digital devices, 5.2 5.4 And following the midterm, we will cover PN diodes again in forward bias, and develop small signal models: Chapter 6 we will then take a week on bipolar junction transistor (BJT): Chapter 7 Then go on to design of transistor amplifiers: chapter 8 MOS operation An inversion mode MOS transistor operates by producing a sheet carriers just under the ide The names source and drain are picked so that the inversion charge is larger at the source end Apprimate inversion charge Q N (y): drain is higher than the source less charge at drain end of channel 2

Gradual channel apprimation We have played pretty fast and loose, using the average charge and average velocity, etc. A more accurate model of the physics includes the fact that the charge density under the gate and the velocity vary along the channel length The current at each point along the length of the device must be independent of position in steady state (no buildup of charge) I D = Wv ( y) Q ( y) y N Where I D is the drain current, y is the distance in the direction from the source to the drain, v y is the component of velocity in the source drain direction, and Q N (y) is the charge density of the electrons under the gate Gradual channel apprimation -2 For most FET s the distances in y, the Source Drain direction, are significantly larger than the distances in the x direction, (perpendicular to the ide). If this assumption is not true, its called a short channel device. This means that the fields in the x direction are much stronger than the fields in the y direction. This is in the text, section 4.3, with the main difference from the simple apprimation being the back gate effect, due to the variation in the depletion width to the body (substrate). 3

Effect of substrate voltage What is the effect of different substrate voltages? Depletion width W changes Need to account for different depletion region charge ( SB = 0): ( SB 0): Q B0 = 2qN A S B A ε 2φ Q = 2qN ε 2φ + S P P SB Threshold voltage: general General form (with substrate bias): T 2φ Q B0 = FB P C Q C Substituting the capacitance as a function of voltage: Where: T γ = = T 0 2qN ε C + γ A ( 2φ P + SB 2φ P ) S + for NMOS -for PMOS 4

Threshold voltage, summary If SB = 0 (no substrate bias): T 0 Q = FB 2φ F C If SB 0 (non-zero substrate bias) T = B Q C ( 2φ P + SB φp ) T 0 + γ 2 Body effect (substrate-bias) coefficient: 2qN Aε S γ = C (NMOS) Threshold voltage increases as SB increases. The threshold voltage will also vary along the gate. Department This of EECS is called the body effect, or back gate effect. Threshold oltage (NMOS vs. PMOS) Substrate Fermi potential Depletion charge density Substrate bias coefficient Substrate bias voltage Threshold voltage (enhancement devices) NMOS (p-substrate) φ p < 0 Q B < 0 γ > 0 SB > 0 T0 > 0 PMOS (n-substrate) φ n > 0 Q B > 0 γ < 0 SB < 0 T0 < 0 5

Body effect oltage SB changes the threshold voltage of transistor For NMOS, Body normally connected to ground for PMOS, body normally connected to cc Raising source voltage increases T of transistor B S G D B S G D p+ n+ n+ L x j n+ p+ p+ L x j NMOS N well PMOS p-type substrate Threshold voltage adjustment Threshold voltage can be changed by doping the channel region with donor or acceptor ions For NMOS: The threshold voltage is increased by adding acceptor ions The threshold voltage is decreased by adding donor ions For PMOS: The threshold voltage is increased by adding donor ions The threshold voltage is decreased by adding acceptor ions Apprimate change in threshold voltage: Density of implanted ions = N I [cm -2 ] qn = C T 0 I 6

Channel Length Modulation As is increased, the pinch-off point moves closer to source, shortening the channel length The drain current increases due to shorter channel ' L = L L I D = 1 2 W µ nc TN + λ L 2 ( ) ( 1 ) λ = channel length modulation coefficient Cutoff < < TN TP I D Linear TN TP,, = 0 < Saturation > Review TN TP I D = µ C W L 1 2 [( ) ] TN, TN 1 W 2 I D = C 2 T TP, TP L T 2 ( ) ( 1 ) µ + λ Note: if SB 0, need to calculate T 7

NMOS i = T Slope due to Channel length modulation Steps PMOS Slope due to Channel length modulation = T 8

We now have reasonable mathematical models for NMOS and PMOS field effect transistors. We will now develop small signal models, allowing us to make equivalent circuits. The whole idea will be to make models that you can manipulate easily, and analyze and design circuits with FETs. We will also look at how SPICE models FETs for both small signal models and large signal models Small signal models: two terminals The current into a device depends on the history of voltages which have been applied to it I ( = F{ ( τ < } Let s say this can be written as a function of the voltage, and its derivative with respect to time I( = d ( (, dt But that it is a nonlinear function f 9

Often we will be interested in running devices at a particular steady voltage or operating point, and then have the time varying signal be small compared to the DC voltage. We write this: ( = 0 + v( If we plug this back into our equation: d ( dv( I( = f (, = f 0 + v(, dt dt Let s assume that v( is very small, so we can do a Taylor expansion around 0 linearization Taylor expansion about the first argument: df ( x) f ( x) f ( x0) + x dx dv( I( f 0, dt + v( x= x 0 +L dv( f (, ), dt = 0 Doing the same about the second argument: dv( I( f (,0) + v( f (,0) + (0, dt = ξ f We can then write: 1 dv( I( I0 + v( + C R dt Where 1 dv( = f (,0) I = f ( ) C = dt 0 ξ ) 0 0,0 R = 0 0 ξ = 0 (0, ξ ) ξ f ξ = 0 10

From math to equivalent circuit We can then take: I ( = I0 + i( Where i( is the small signal current. Then: 1 dv( i( v( + C R dt But this mathematical formula relating the small signal voltage to the small signal currents can be i( represented as a circuit again: + v( C R Which is why we picked R and C, of course! Since a small change to a voltage or current into a device with other voltages or currents held constant generally results in a small, proportionate change, we can often model a device for small changes with linear equations. The linear equations can often be translated back into a circuit which would have the equivalent set of linear equations. Why would we do this? Because we can develop and use intuition about linear circuit elements, like resistors and capacitors, in series or parallel 11

Constructing by inspection Many times, rather than going through a process of deriving a mathematical formula and then translating it back into a circuit model, you can look at a device and create a equivalent circuit Charge storage is modeled as a capacitor Currents proportional to voltages are modeled by resistors. No model is perfect, build a simple model first, and then add to it as necessary Remember: Parallel: current gets a choice Series: current must go through both LSI resistor Lets construct a small signal model for a LSI resistor: 12

Back to the FET The current from the drain of our FET can be modeled for small signals: i () t = I + i ds For a given operating point voltage for gs and ds, we get: Which we will then label: i i i = v + v ds gs ds vgs vds 1 i = g v + v r ds m gs ds o Transconductance Conductance Substrate potential Lets look at the back gate effect in a small signal model Effect: changes threshold voltage, which changes the drain current substrate acts like a backgate id i g D mb = = v v Q = (,, BS ) BS Q BS Q are all held constant 13

Backgate Transconductance ( ) T = T0 + γ SB 2φp 2φp Result: g mb id id Tn γ gm = = = v v 2 2φ BS Q Tn Q BS Q BS p Notice that we have terms in our equations which give the small signal current into one terminal in as a constant times the small signal voltage into another terminal. In order to translate that into an equivalent circuit, we will use variable current sources + i 2 = gv v1 1 Where g is called the transconductance 14

Combining terms: Small-Signal Model We now have three small singnal contributions to the current into the drain terminal for our FET, from changes in gs, bs, and ds 1 i = g v + g v + v r ds m gs mb bs ds o Notice that the change in the small signal current into the drain from A small signal change in ds can be modeled as a resistor. Capacitances While adequate for some purposes, the model so far implies that the current into the gate is zero. This is a good apprimation for low frequencies, for high frequencies we need to account for the current necessary to charge up the gate to supply the field across the ide. There are also stray capacitances to the drain and source contacts 15

MOSFET Capacitances in Saturation The gate-drain capacitance is only the fringe capacitance when in saturation, because it is pinched off from the charge in the channel. Gate-source capacitance: There is fringing charge between the edge of the gate and the source, but also to the channel Gate-Source Capacitance C gs Wedge-shaped charge in saturation effective area is (2/3)WL (see H&S 4.5.4 for details) C = (2 /3) WLC + C gs Overlap capacitance along source edge of gate C = L ov D WC (This is an underestimate, fringing fields will make The overlap capacitance larger) ov 16

Gate-Drain Capacitance C gd There is no contribution due to change in inversion charge in channel, just overlap capacitance between drain and source Junction Capacitances The source, gate, and drain will also have capacitances between them and the well or substrate. Capacitances to the drain and source will be junction capacitances, and since SB and DB = SB + reverse biases are different, the capacitances will be different 17

Seeking perfection Remember that all of the capacitances, resistances and transimpedances will change as the operating point changes There is no such thing as a perfect small signal model, use the simplest one that is sufficient. Sometimes a small signal model is used well outside of where it is accurate, because it is the main way we can deal intuitively with these devices! 18