Deformation Quantization

Similar documents
FLABBY STRICT DEFORMATION QUANTIZATIONS AND K-GROUPS

Deformations of coisotropic submanifolds in symplectic geometry

arxiv: v1 [math.qa] 23 Jul 2016

The Erwin Schrodinger International Boltzmanngasse 9. Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria

On the geometry of coisotropic submanifolds of Poisson manifolds

A star product for the volume form Nambu-Poisson structure on a Kähler manifold.

Symplectic and Poisson Manifolds

Natural star products on symplectic manifolds and quantum moment maps

Deformation Quantization and the Moyal Star Product

Locally conformal Dirac structures and infinitesimal automorphisms

STRICT QUANTIZATIONS OF ALMOST POISSON MANIFOLDS

Classifying Morita equivalent star products

Poisson Manifolds Bihamiltonian Manifolds Bihamiltonian systems as Integrable systems Bihamiltonian structure as tool to find solutions

Topics in Representation Theory: Cultural Background

ISOMORPHISMS OF POISSON AND JACOBI BRACKETS

Non-associative Deformations of Geometry in Double Field Theory

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM INTEGRABILITY

Traces for star products on symplectic manifolds

Formality Theory: From Poisson structures to Deformation Quantization. Chiara Esposito

INTEGRATION OF TWISTED POISSON STRUCTURES ALBERTO S. CATTANEO AND PING XU

HONGYU HE. p = mẋ; q = x. be the Hamiltonian. It represents the energy function. Then H q = kq,

BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 33, Number 1, January 1996

Dirac structures. Henrique Bursztyn, IMPA. Geometry, mechanics and dynamics: the legacy of J. Marsden Fields Institute, July 2012

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems

arxiv: v1 [math.qa] 31 Jan 2019

NAMBU-LIE GROUP ACTIONS. 1. Introduction

LECTURE 1: LINEAR SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY

A 2-COCYCLE ON A GROUP OF SYMPLECTOMORPHISMS

hal , version 1-12 Sep 2006

A MARSDEN WEINSTEIN REDUCTION THEOREM FOR PRESYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS

Dynamical systems on Leibniz algebroids

XVIIIth International Conference Geometry, Integrability and Quantization

Del Pezzo surfaces and non-commutative geometry

A Note on Poisson Symmetric Spaces

On algebraic index theorems. Ryszard Nest. Introduction. The index theorem. Deformation quantization and Gelfand Fuks. Lie algebra theorem

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

Poisson geometry of b-manifolds. Eva Miranda

arxiv:math-ph/ v1 26 Sep 1998

On the Kontsevich Formula for Deformation Quantization.

The Erwin Schrödinger International Boltzmanngasse 9 Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria

Deformations of Coisotropic Submanifolds of Jacobi Manifolds

LECTURE 10: THE ATIYAH-GUILLEMIN-STERNBERG CONVEXITY THEOREM

Invariance of tautological equations

The Poisson Embedding Problem

From Dirac operator to supermanifolds and supersymmetries PAI DYGEST Meeting

arxiv: v1 [math.qa] 2 Dec 2018

GLASGOW Paolo Lorenzoni

Lie algebra cohomology

On the holonomy fibration

Vector fields in the presence of a contact structure

Deformation Quantization : an introduction

COMPUTING THE POISSON COHOMOLOGY OF A B-POISSON MANIFOLD

From symplectic to spin geometry

Cocycle deformation of operator algebras

Poisson Structures. concerning their singularities

THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. Fall Last updated: November 26, (Under construction.)

UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ Luiz Henrique Pereira Pêgas THE HOCHSCHILD-KOSTANT-ROSENBERG THEOREM FOR SMOOTH MANIFOLDS. Curitiba, 2010.

Eva Miranda. UPC-Barcelona. (joint with Victor Guillemin and Ana Rita Pires) Zaragoza, February

Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps

The Geometry of Euler s equation. Introduction

Derived Poisson structures and higher character maps

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 10 Mar 2003

Vectors. January 13, 2013

Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools

Math 535a Homework 5

THE MODULAR CLASS OF A LIE ALGEBROID COMORPHISM

Dirac Structures on Banach Lie Algebroids

On the Virtual Fundamental Class

R-flux string sigma model and algebroid duality on Lie 3-algebroids

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

Deformation Quantization: a survey

THE GEOMETRY OF B-FIELDS. Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) Odense November 26th 2009

DEFORMATION QUANTIZATION

arxiv: v1 [math.qa] 1 Jul 2015

arxiv: v1 [math.qa] 8 Oct 2007

FROM LOCAL TO GLOBAL DEFORMATION QUANTIZATION OF POISSON MANIFOLDS ALBERTO S. CATTANEO, GIOVANNI FELDER AND LORENZO TOMASSINI

Generalized Contact Structures

L 2 Geometry of the Symplectomorphism Group

The Toda Lattice. Chris Elliott. April 9 th, 2014

Title. Author(s)YAMAGUCHI, KEIZO. CitationHokkaido University Preprint Series in Mathematics, Issue Date DOI / Doc URL.

Contact manifolds and generalized complex structures

Universal star products

Generalized Tian-Todorov theorems

Twist deformation quantization, gravity and Einstein spaces. Paolo Aschieri U.Piemonte Orientale, Alessandria

A Note on n-ary Poisson Brackets

Symplectic algebraic geometry and quiver varieties

Physical justification for using the tensor product to describe two quantum systems as one joint system

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY

arxiv: v2 [math.qa] 15 May 2017

Quantum Co-Adjoint Orbits of the Group of Affine Transformations of the Complex Line 1

Symplectic Geometry versus Riemannian Geometry

Linear Algebra II Lecture 22

Suppose A h is a flat family of non-commutative algebras, such that A 0 is commutative.

Atiyah classes and homotopy algebras

Noncommutative CP N and CH N and their physics

LIE ALGEBROIDS AND POISSON GEOMETRY, OLIVETTI SEMINAR NOTES

Factorization Algebras Associated to the (2, 0) Theory IV. Kevin Costello Notes by Qiaochu Yuan

Integrability and Associativity

Transcription:

FFP14 Pierre Bieliavsky (U. Louvain, Belgium) 15 Jully 2014

References Bayen, F.; Flato, M.; Fronsdal, C.; Lichnerowicz, A.; Sternheimer, D.; Deformation theory and quantization. Ann. Physics (1978) Weinstein, Alan; Deformation quantization. Séminaire Bourbaki. Astrisque (1995) Kontsevich, Maxim ; Formality conjecture, in Deformation Theory and Symplectic Geometry, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1997) Cattaneo, Alberto S.; Felder, Giovanni; A path integral approach to the Kontsevich quantization formula. Comm. Math. Phys. (2000) Bieliavsky, Pierre; Gayral, Victor ; for actions of Kahlerian Lie groups Memoirs of the Amercian Mathematical Society (2014)

Matrices and triangles

Matrices and triangles A := M n (C)

Matrices and triangles A := M n (C) µ : A A A : a b a.b matrix multiplication

Matrices and triangles A := M n (C) µ : A A A : a b a.b matrix multiplication µ(a b) =: < K, a b > with K A A A

Matrices and triangles A := M n (C) µ : A A A : a b a.b matrix multiplication µ(a b) =: < K, a b > with K A A A

Matrices and triangles Consider n points ( configuration space ):

Matrices and triangles Consider n points ( configuration space ):

Matrices and triangles Consider n points ( configuration space ): Consider the set M of all the arrows between pairs of points ( phase space ):

Matrices and triangles Consider n points ( configuration space ): Consider the set M of all the arrows between pairs of points ( phase space ): Note: M = n 2 = dim C (A).

Matrices and triangles Consider n points ( configuration space ): Consider the set M of all the arrows between pairs of points ( phase space ): Note: M = n 2 = dim C (A).

Matrices and triangles Triangle: loop constituted by sequence of 3 consecutive arrows.

Matrices and triangles Triangle: loop constituted by sequence of 3 consecutive arrows. A triangle:

Matrices and triangles Triangle: loop constituted by sequence of 3 consecutive arrows. A triangle: A := M n (C) is viewed as the space of continuous functions on M ( observables ) : A = C(M).

Matrices and triangles Triangle: loop constituted by sequence of 3 consecutive arrows. A triangle: A := M n (C) is viewed as the space of continuous functions on M ( observables ) : A = C(M). A natural basis of A is given by the characteristic functions of arrows: { 1 if x = E( )(x) := 0 otherwise

Matrices and triangles Then: K = E( ) E( ) E( ).

Matrices and triangles Then: K = E( ) E( ) E( ). Interpretation: union of edges tensor products of characteristic functions

Matrices and triangles Then: K = E( ) E( ) E( ). Interpretation: union of edges tensor products of characteristic functions Union = additive operation (on sets)

Matrices and triangles Then: K = E( ) E( ) E( ). Interpretation: union of edges tensor products of characteristic functions Union = additive operation (on sets) tensor product = multiplicative operation

Matrices and triangles Then: K = E( ) E( ) E( ). Interpretation: union of edges tensor products of characteristic functions Union = additive operation (on sets) tensor product = multiplicative operation Would E( ) E( ) E( ) correspond to an exponential??

OK! Let s try! (Weyl-Moyal quantization)

OK! Let s try! (Weyl-Moyal quantization) Phase space= T (R n ) = R 2n = {x = (q, p) q, p R n }

OK! Let s try! (Weyl-Moyal quantization) Phase space= T (R n ) = R 2n = {x = (q, p) q, p R n } Poisson bracket = {f, g} = ω ij x i f x j g skewsymmetric tensor field: ω = dα

OK! Let s try! (Weyl-Moyal quantization) Phase space= T (R n ) = R 2n = {x = (q, p) q, p R n } Poisson bracket = {f, g} = ω ij x i f x j g skewsymmetric tensor field: ω = dα remind: E( ) E( ) E( )

OK! Let s try! (Weyl-Moyal quantization) Phase space= T (R n ) = R 2n = {x = (q, p) q, p R n } Poisson bracket = {f, g} = ω ij x i f x j g skewsymmetric tensor field: ω = dα remind: E( ) E( ) E( ) ( ) Triangle(x, y, z) exp µ ( ω Triangle(x,y,z) (µ C)

OK! Let s try! (Weyl-Moyal quantization) Phase space= T (R n ) = R 2n = {x = (q, p) q, p R n } Poisson bracket = {f, g} = ω ij x i f x j g skewsymmetric tensor field: ω = dα remind: E( ) E( ) E( ) ( ) Triangle(x, y, z) exp µ ( ω Triangle(x,y,z) (µ C) i.e E( ) := α

OK! Let s try! (Weyl-Moyal quantization) In other words, to observables a, b Cc (R 2n ), one associates: a b(x) := 1 2n K (x, y, z) a(y) b(z) dy dz where K (x, y, z) = e i (ω(x,y)+ω(y,z)+ω(z,x)) (ω(x, y) := ω ij x i y j )

OK! Let s try! (Weyl-Moyal quantization) In other words, to observables a, b Cc (R 2n ), one associates: a b(x) := 1 2n K (x, y, z) a(y) b(z) dy dz where K (x, y, z) = e i (ω(x,y)+ω(y,z)+ω(z,x)) (ω(x, y) := ω ij x i y j ) Asymptotics: a b a.b + k=1 ( ) 1 k ω i 1j 1... ω i kj k i k k! 2i 1...i k a j k 1...j k b

OK! Let s try! (Weyl-Moyal quantization) In other words, to observables a, b Cc (R 2n ), one associates: a b(x) := 1 2n K (x, y, z) a(y) b(z) dy dz where K (x, y, z) = e i (ω(x,y)+ω(y,z)+ω(z,x)) (ω(x, y) := ω ij x i y j ) Asymptotics: a b a.b + k=1 ( ) 1 k ω i 1j 1... ω i kj k i k k! 2i 1...i k a j k 1...j k b Theorem On A := C (R 2n )[[ ]], A A A : (a, b) a b is associative.

OK! Let s try! (Weyl-Moyal quantization) Did we know all this already??

OK! Let s try! (Weyl-Moyal quantization) Did we know all this already?? YES! Theorem[Weyl - von Neumann (1931)] Canonical Schrödinger quantization (Weyl ordered): Then Polynomials(R 2n ) L(L 2 (R n )) : a Op (a) Op (q j )ϕ(q) = q j ϕ(q) Op (p)ϕ(q) = i q j ϕ(q) Op (a) Op (b) = Op (a b).

Definition A Poisson manifold is a smooth manifold M endowed with a skewsymmetric bi-vector field w such that the associated bracket on C (M): {f, g} := w ij x i f x j g satisfies {f, {g, h}} + {h, {f, g}} + {g, {h, f }} = 0. Examples: canonical phase space: (T (N), ω Liouville ) g = Lie algebra, dual: M = g with {f, g}(x) := < x, [df x, dg x ] > ((g ) = g)

Definition [Bayen,Flato,Fronsdal, Lichnerowicz, Sternheimer (1977)] A star-product (or deformation quantization) on a Poisson manifold (M, w) is an associative C[[ ]]-bilinear product law on C (M)[[ ]] =: A A A A : (a, b) a b such that (i) a b = a.b + k=1 k C k (a, b) (ii) C 1 (a, b) C 1 (b, a) = i {a, b} (iii) C k = bi-differential operator on C (M) vanishing on constants.

Theorem [Kontsevitch (1997)] Every Poisson manifold admits a star-product.

Theorem [Kontsevitch (1997)] Every Poisson manifold admits a star-product. Remark: the proof uses (highly sophisticated) flux type methods.

Conclusion 1. Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds is a notion that encompasses Quantization of classical phase spaces within the framework of classical observables (no Hilbert space representation is needed).

Conclusion 1. Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds is a notion that encompasses Quantization of classical phase spaces within the framework of classical observables (no Hilbert space representation is needed). 2. Its mathematical background is Poisson geometry that encompasses both symplectic geometry and Lie theory.

Conclusion 1. Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds is a notion that encompasses Quantization of classical phase spaces within the framework of classical observables (no Hilbert space representation is needed). 2. Its mathematical background is Poisson geometry that encompasses both symplectic geometry and Lie theory.