NCAR(CESM) Center Report

Similar documents
Update on CAM and the AMWG. Recent activities and near-term priorities. by the AMWG

! An Update on CAM-CLUBB Coupled Simulations

Results from CAM-SE AMIP and coupled simulations

Tropical Cyclones and precipitation in 25 Km CAM4 and CAM5

Standalone simulations: CAM3, CAM4 and CAM5

The Art of Tuning and Coupling: A peek behind the scenes of CESM development. Cécile Hannay CAM science liaison AMP-CGD

Rich Neale, Peter Caldwell, Christiane Jablonowski and Cecile Hannay

Correspondence between short and long timescale systematic errors in CAM4/CAM5 explored by YOTC data

Atmospheric modeling in the Climate System. Joe Tribbia NCAR.ESSL.CGD.AMP

Sensitivity to the CAM candidate schemes in climate and forecast runs along the Pacific Cross-section

How not to build a Model: Coupling Cloud Parameterizations Across Scales. Andrew Gettelman, NCAR

CESM1.5 simulations since Mini-Breck

Influence of clouds on radiative fluxes in the Arctic. J. English, J. Kay, A. Gettelman CESM Workshop / PCWG Meeting June 20, 2012

Atmospheric composition in the Community Earth System Model (CESM)

Radiative Convective Equilibrium in Single Column CAM. I Kuan Hu, Brian Mapes, Richard Neale, and Andrew Gettelman 22 nd CESM Workshop

Example Biases and Development Needs for CESM

A Unified Convection Scheme, UNICON

Short Term forecasts along the GCSS Pacific Cross-section: Evaluating new Parameterizations in the Community Atmospheric Model

CESM1-WACCM: Comparison with CCSM4/ CESM CMIP5 simulations

Tropical cyclones and seasonal means in high-resolution CAM 5 runs.

Evaluating parameterized variables in the Community Atmospheric Model along the GCSS Pacific cross-section

Rotating and non-rotating global radiativeconvective

Short Term forecasts along the GCSS Pacific Cross-section: Evaluating new Parameterizations in the Community Atmospheric Model

A new century-long high-resolution global climate run using the Community Earth System Model.

CAM6/CESM2 development simulations Cécile Hannay, Rich Neale, Pete Bogenschutz, Julio Bacmeister, Andrew Gettelman, and Joe Tribbia

Isotope modeling with CESM

Reduced Complexity Frameworks for Exploring Physics Dynamics Coupling Sensitivities

Tropical Cyclone Simulations in CAM5: The Impact of the Dynamical Core

A Unified Convection Scheme : UNICON

TC forecasting with variable resolution in CAM-MPAS

State of CESM. Jean-François Lamarque. CESM Chief Scientist NCAR. Breckenridge June Jean-François Lamarque.

Development of the Atmospheric Component of the Next Generation GFDL Climate Model

Introduction to the Community Earth System Model

Sensitivity to the PBL and convective schemes in forecasts with CAM along the Pacific Cross-section

A Global Atmospheric Model. Joe Tribbia NCAR Turbulence Summer School July 2008

Sungsu Park, Chris Bretherton, and Phil Rasch

Report to WGNE: Selected GFDL Research Activities

Enforcing conservation of atmospheric axial angular momentum in CAM FV: Method and results in CESM2 and NorESM2 simulations

CESM2 (WACCM6): Stratospheric Evaluation

PUBLICATIONS. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

SPCAM5: Multi-scale Modeling of Aerosols, Clouds and Precipitation

The influence of fixing the Southern Ocean shortwave radiation model bias on global energy budgets and circulation patterns

Overview of Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) a new model from US Department of Energy from Ruby Leung, E3SM Chief Scientist

Analysis of the Hydrologic Cycle in the Community Atmosphere Model

Influence of super-parameterization and a higher-order turbulence closure on rainfall

High-Resolution MPAS Simulations for Analysis of Climate Change Effects on Weather Extremes

State of WACCM. A. Gettelman, L. M. Polvani, M. Mills + WACCM Team

Aquaplanet warming experiments with CAM: a tale of the subtropics

Arctic Boundary Layer

Implementation and validation of the. ECMWF IFS convection scheme. in COSMO-CLM. Peter Brockhaus. Daniel Lüthi. Christoph Schär

Exploration of California High Resolution Snowpack Modeling with Realistic Surface-Atmospheric Radiation Physics

What governs the location of the Southern Ocean deep winter mixing in CESM

The Community Earth System Model State of the CESM. June, 2012

World Weather Research Programme WWRP. PM Ruti WMO

The Regional Arctic System Model (RASM) for Studying High Resolution Climate Changes in the Arctic

THE PACIFIC DECADAL OSCILLATION, REVISITED. Matt Newman, Mike Alexander, and Dima Smirnov CIRES/University of Colorado and NOAA/ESRL/PSD

Carbon Isotopes in the icesm

Summary and concluding remarks

NSF 2005 CPT Report. Jeffrey T. Kiehl & Cecile Hannay

Torres del Paine, Patagonia, Chile

IITM Earth System Model (IITM ESM)

Tropical Cyclones-Ocean interaction as represented by a 25km resolution CGCM: the role of the coupling frequency

Weather and Climate Prediction ATM S 380

Seasonal forecasting activities at ECMWF

Progress and Challenges in Coupled Ice- Sheet/Climate Modeling with CESM

Arctic System Reanalysis Provides Highresolution Accuracy for Arctic Studies

Susan Bates Ocean Model Working Group Science Liaison

Norwegian Climate Prediction Model (NorCPM) getting ready for CMIP6 DCPP

The Climate System and Climate Models. Gerald A. Meehl National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado

From small-scale turbulence to large-scale convection: a unified scale-adaptive EDMF parameterization

WP 4 Testing Arctic sea ice predictability in NorESM

Yuqing Wang. International Pacific Research Center and Department of Meteorology University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822

Parameterization of Cumulus Convective Cloud Systems in Mesoscale Forecast Models

1. Header Land-Atmosphere Predictability Using a Multi-Model Strategy Paul A. Dirmeyer (PI) Zhichang Guo (Co-I) Final Report

Diagnosis of Relative Humidity Changes in a Warmer Climate Using Tracers of Last Saturation

ESM development at the Met Office Hadley Centre

Temperature and rainfall changes over East Africa from multi-gcm forced RegCM projections

An Introduction to Climate Modeling

CHAPTER 8 NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF THE ITCZ OVER THE INDIAN OCEAN AND INDONESIA DURING A NORMAL YEAR AND DURING AN ENSO YEAR

EC-Earth update, new developments and future priorities

Representing sub-grid heterogeneity of cloud and precipitation across scales

What you need to know in Ch. 12. Lecture Ch. 12. Atmospheric Heat Engine

A Multi-year Hindcast Experiment for Cloud and Precipitation Studies

Japanese CLIMATE 2030 Project 110km mesh model

WaVaCS summerschool Autumn 2009 Cargese, Corsica

4.4 EVALUATION OF AN IMPROVED CONVECTION TRIGGERING MECHANISM IN THE NCAR COMMUNITY ATMOSPHERE MODEL CAM2 UNDER CAPT FRAMEWORK

Tropical cyclone simulations and predictions with GFDL s prototype global cloud resolving model

China ESM Developments in the past year

An Introduction to Coupled Models of the Atmosphere Ocean System

Characteristics of Global Precipitable Water Revealed by COSMIC Measurements

SPECIAL PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT

Numerical simulation of marine stratocumulus clouds Andreas Chlond

Recent, current & future work with NorESM-L in Bergen

Regional Climate Simulations with WRF Model

Extratropical and Polar Cloud Systems

Stable Water Isotopes in CAM5: Current development and initial results

(1) Arctic Sea Ice Predictability,

Energetic and precipitation responses in the Sahel to sea surface temperature perturbations

Testing and Improving Pacific NW PBL forecasts

Cloud Feedbacks and Climate Models

Transcription:

NCAR(CESM) Center Report Contributions from Richard Neale, Bette Otto-Bliesner, Cecile Hannay, Sungsu Park, Andrew Gettelman, Peter Lauritzen Vincent Larson (U. Wisconsin) Kevin Reed (SUNY Stonybrook) WGNE-30 Meeting, Greenbelt MD, USA, 24 March 2015

CESM Developments for CMIP6 Prognostic precipitation (MG2: snow,rain but no heavy ice-phase) Aerosols Moving from 3-moment MAM3 to 4 moment MAM4 Stratospheric/volcanic aerosol will be prognostic Prescribed MAM available Isotopes Convection/PBL schemes Config. 1) UNICON; Config. 2) CLUBB+ZM; Config. 3) No change Both new configurations (1,2) degrade ENSO External panel (re-)evaluation due in June 2015

CESM Developments for CMIP6 Prognostic precipitation (MG2*: snow,rain but no heavy ice-phase) Aerosols Moving from 3-moment MAM3 to 4 moment MAM4 Stratospheric/volcanic aerosol will be prognostic Prescribed MAM available Isotopes Convection/PBL schemes Config. 1) UNICON; Config. 2) CLUBB+ZM; Config. 3) No change Both new configurations (1,2) degrade ENSO External panel (re-)evaluation due in June 2015 Ready to go and approved by NCAR oversight committees *Gettelman, A., & Morrison, H. (2014). Advanced Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics for Global Models. Part I: Off-Line Tests and Comparison with Other Schemes. Journal of Climate.

CESM Developments for CMIP6 Prognostic precipitation (MG2: snow,rain but no heavy ice-phase) Aerosols Moving from 3-moment MAM3 to 4 moment MAM4 Stratospheric/volcanic aerosol will be prognostic Prescribed MAM available Isotopes Convection/PBL schemes Config. 1) UNICON; Config. 2) CLUBB+ZM; Config. 3) No change Both new configurations (1,2) degrade ENSO External panel (re-)evaluation due in June 2015

Water Isotopes in CESM2 Bette Otto-Bliesner Tracers for following the isotopic content of water have been implemented in CAM5.3, POP2, CLM4, RTM, CICE4, and CPL7. The implementations are being readied for merging into the development trunk. We are also currently updating to the newest versions of these models for CESM2. Long coupled baseline simulations for Preindustrial and Present using CESM1.2 are being evaluated and show promising results. Carbon isotopes also implemented

Water Isotopes in CESM1.2 a) GNIP Obs b) wiso-cesm Precipitation δ 18 O in (a) the observation and (b) the coupled wiso-cesm under present day conditions (year 91-100) (Courtesy Jiang Zhu). The coupled model captures the major features of the observation. The model is still undergoing slow spin-up due to the slow evolution in deep ocean.

CESM Developments for CMIP6 Prognostic precipitation (MG2: snow,rain but no heavy ice-phase) Aerosols Moving from 3-moment MAM3 to 4 moment MAM4 Stratospheric/volcanic aerosol will be prognostic Prescribed MAM available Isotopes Convection/PBL schemes Config. 1) UNICON; Config. 2) CLUBB+ZM; Config. 3) No change Both new configurations (1,2) degrade ENSO External panel (re-)evaluation due in June 2015

Vincent Larson & Andrew Gettelman Prognostic moments w/high order closures (1 third order, 8 second order, possibly advected) Unifies moist and dry turbulence (except deep convection) Uses two Gaussians to describe the sub-grid PDF of each quantity (joint w,q, and θ) Larson, V. E. and Golaz, J.-C.: Using probability density functions to derive consistent closure relationships among higher-order moments, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 1023 1042, 2005

Sungsu Park Unifies deep and shallow convection schemes Generates forced/free/dry shallow convection + deep convection Accounts for sub-grid mesoscale flows (prognostic representations of subgrid variability) Park, S. (2014). A unified convection scheme (UNICON). Part I: Formulation. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 71(11), 3902-3930.

CERES-EBAF CLUBB CAM5.3 ANN UNICON

MERRA CLUBB CAM5.3 persistent wet bias CLUBB/UNICON dryer PBL water too high Mid-latitude moisture increased CAM5.3 UNICON

5 3 2 HADISST 5 3 2 CLUBB ENSO not well simulated UNICON too strong amplitude at two wide a frequency CLUBB has very weak amplitude and no preferred frequency 5 CAM5.3 5 3 2 3 2 UNICON

Other significant simulations/results AMIP runs at 100 km SE/FV* climates are close Coupled runs 100km atmos/1 o ocean SE leads to cooler ocean than FV. SE rejected for bulk of CMIP6 work (at 1 o ) AMIP runs and time-slice runs at 25 km High-resolution calculations will continue to use SE 25 km FV and SE AMIPs are close, a few more TCs/year globally in SE *SE = Spectral Element dynamical core, FV=finite volume dycore (latlon)

Other significant simulations/results AMIP runs at 100 km SE/FV* climates are close Coupled runs 100km atmos/1 o ocean SE leads to cooler ocean than FV. SE rejected for bulk of CMIP6 work (at 1 o ) AMIP runs and time-slice runs at 25 km High-resolution calculations will continue to use SE 25 km FV and SE AMIPs are close, a few more TCs/year globally in SE *SE = Spectral Element dynamical core, FV=finite volume dycore (latlon)

Coupled run spin-up (Cecile Hannay) CESM1.1: Finite volume (FV) CESM1.2: Spectral element (SE) Spunup ocean TS TS TOA balance TOA balance When starting from spunup ocean, model quickly adjusts (20 years) 1.0K Levitus TS 1.5K TS TOA balance When starting from Levitus, model spinups longer (100 years). TOA balance Cooling despite mostly positive TOA radiation balance!

SST biases Compared to HadISST/OI.v2 (pre-industrial) Finite Volume: Spunup ocean Spectral Element: Spunup ocean SST Bias similar to FV except SE Pacific. Finite Volume: Levitus Spectral Element: Levitus SSTs stabilize but too cold compared to obs SST: 0.5K colder than FV

Ocean temperature bias Finite Volume: Levitus T bias = Tocn - Levitus Spectral Element : Levitus When starting from Levitus: - cools near the surface - warms around 750 meter - exacerbated in SE Spectral Element: Spunup ocean When starting from long spunup ocean: - the 750-meter warm layer is present at initialization 750-meter warm layer is a signature of Spectral Element (present in every run)

Is 750-meter warming uniform over ocean? Bias at 750m = T 750-m - Levitus Finite Volume (yrs 70-89) Spectral Element (yrs 70-89) Warming is not uniform: areas of warming and cooling Warming also exists in Finite Volume but cooling compensates warming globally.

Other significant simulations/results AMIP runs at 100 km SE/FV* climates are close Coupled runs 100km atmos/1 o ocean SE leads to cooler ocean than FV. SE rejected for bulk of CMIP6 work (at 1 o ) AMIP runs and time-slice runs at 25 km High-resolution calculations will continue to use SE 25 km FV and SE AMIPs are close, a few more TCs/year globally in SE *SE = Spectral Element dynamical core, FV=finite volume dycore (latlon)

AMIP runs and time-slice runs at 25 km All runs untuned, i.e., 100km physics settings used at 25km ~300 years of prescribed SST simulation at 25km resolution + 50 years coupled (0.1 o ocean)

Summary Taylor diagram for 1980-2005 AMIP runs Black CAM3 FV 1 Deg Blue CAM5 ne30 (100 km) Green CAM5 ne120 (25 km) Overall RMSE lower, i.e. better, for ne30 Arrows show change of land and ocean precipitation as resolution increases both degrade

JJA Seasonal-mean precipitation (1980-2005) ne30 100 km ne120 25 km DJF ¼ degree JJA ¼ degree DJF GPCP JJA GPCP

Have also looked at: SST generation for future time-slices Coupling of atmosphere to ocean surface Aerosols Possible implications for HighResMIP? -On Thursday

Summary CMIP6 version of CESM may look very much like CMIP5 version No increase in horizontal or vertical resolution No change in dycore Possible changes to convection/pbl schemes still under evaluation Extensive work with current version at high-resolution ( x~25km) Mean climate not optimal Some dycore impact on TC statistics Interesting climate change impacts on TCs emerging

Thank You

EXTRA SLIDES

Carbon isotopes in CESM2 Carbon isotopes ( 13 C and 14 C) have been added to the land model (CLM4.5, released with CESM1.2, A. Bozbiyik et al., U. Bern) and ocean model (POP2, to be released with CESM1.3, A. Jahn et al. 2015, under revision for GMD) Ocean 13 C use for scientific applications depends on the availability of a fast spin-up technique for ocean ecosystem tracers (currently under development, K. Lindsay, NCAR) Carbon isotopes are planned to be added to the atmosphere (CAM5.5/6) to allow for coupled carbon isotope simulations 12 C 6 protons 6 (stable) neutrons (stable) Carbon isotopes 13 C 6 protons 7 neutrons (stable ) (stable) 14 C 6 protons (Radioactive) 8 neutrons (radioactive)