Climate Change Impact Assessment on Indian Water Resources Ashvin Gosain, Sandhya Rao, Debajit Basu Ray
Objectives of the Study To quantify the impact of the climate change on the water resources of the country Identify Hotspots Identify Adaptation & Coping strategies
Data Used for Modeling DEM: 1km grid, generated using contours from 1:25 topographic data Land use: 1:2M USGS Soil: 1:5M FAO Weather: Data generated by the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction U.K. at a resolution of.44 X.44 latitude by longitude (HadRM2) from IITM, Pune
River Basins Modeled
Assumptions The land use has been assumed to remain same Water bodies including reservoirs could not be incorporated at this stage due to lack of data - capacities and the operation rules
16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Drought Prone Basin-Krishna River Basin Annual water balance components Krishna Control Scenario 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 Value (mm) 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 25 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 26 GHG Scenario Value (mm)
Monthly water balance components for Krishna river basin 3 25 GHG Scenario 2 15 1 5 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Value (mm) 3 25 2 15 1 5 Control Scenario Value (mm) Jan
Change in Monthly water balance components for Krishna river basin Value (mm) 3 2 1-1 -2 Change in monthly water balance for Control and GHG climate Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Value (mm) 15 1 5-5 Change (%) in monthly water balance for Control and GHG climate scenarios Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -3-4 -1-5
Sub-basin Water Balance components for Krishna Basin 18 16 14 Current Scenario 16 14 GHG Scenario Values (mm) 12 1 8 6 Values (mm) 12 1 8 6 4 4 2 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 21 Subbasin Subbasin
Change in Sub-basin Water Balance components for Krishna Values (mm) 1 5-5 -1-15 -2 Change in Water Balance Components Change in Change in Change in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 21 % Change 2 1-1 -2-3 -4 % Change in Water Balance Components % Change in % Change in % Change in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 21-25 -5-3 -6-35 -7 Subbasin Subbasin
Current to GHG - Krishna Sub-basins Reduction in precipitation by about 2% of the current value Corresponding decrease in water yield over the sub-basins is varying between 3% to 5% Actual evapotranspiration reduced by about 5% over most of the sub-basins
Vulnerability Assessment Procedure Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) widely used index incorporates information on rainfall, land-use, and soil properties in a lumped manner PDSI value below. indicates the beginning of drought situation A value below -3. as sever drought condition Soil Moisture Index to monitor drought severity Narasiman, B., and Srinivasan, R., 22
Number of drought weeks in Sub-basins of Krishna for Current to GHG scenarios Total Drought Events (Weeks) 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Total Drought Event (current) Total Drought Event (GHG) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 21 Subbasins
Krishna Sub-basins with maximum Monsoon & Non monsoon events Weeks 6 5 4 3 2 1 Subbasin 15- Control Maximum M drought weeks Drought Weeks 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 Weeks 6 5 4 3 2 1 Subbasin 15- GHG Drought Weeks 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 Weeks 6 5 4 3 2 1 Subbasin 11- Control Drought Weeks 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 Weeks 6 5 4 3 2 1 Subbasin 11- GHG Maximum M drought weeks Drought Weeks 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 Weeks 6 5 4 3 2 1 Subbasin 4 - Control Maximum NM drought weeks Drought Weeks 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 Weeks 6 5 4 3 2 1 Subbasin 4- GHG Drought Weeks 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 Weeks 6 5 4 3 2 1 Subbasin 13- Control Drought Weeks 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 Weeks 6 5 4 3 2 1 Subbasin 13- GHG Maximum NM drought weeks Drought Weeks 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2
Krishna River - Flow Duration Curve Flow (Cumecs) 1 1 1 1 1 1.1.1.1.1.1 PRESNT FUTURE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 % of time Q equal or exceeded 1 Dependable Flow (cumecs) 25% 5% 75% 9% PRESENT 4867 146.5784.5251 FUTURE 4261 664.8.2969.3422
2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Flood Prone Basin - Mahanadi River Basin Annual water balance components Mahanadi Control Scenario 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 Value (mm) 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 25 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 26 GHG Scenario Value (mm)
Monthly water balance components for Mahanadi river basin 5 45 4 Control Scenario 5 45 4 GHG Scenario 35 35 Value (mm) 3 25 2 Value (mm) 3 25 2 15 15 1 1 5 5 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Change in Monthly water balance components for Mahanadi river basin 14 12 1 Change in monthly water balance for Control and GHG climate scenarios 2 15 Change (%) in monthly water balance for Control and GHG climate scenarios 8 Value (mm) 6 4 2 Value (mm) 1 5-2 -4 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -5 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -6
Sub-basin Water Balance components for Mahanadi River Basin an increase in precipitation, water yield and evapotranspiration has been predicted in all the sub-basins of Mahanadi 2 18 16 Current Scenario 25 2 GHG Scenario 14 Values (mm) 12 1 8 6 4 Values (mm) 15 1 5 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 21 Subbasin 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 21 Subbasin
Flood Analysis - Mahanadi Basin Annual daily peak discharge (cumecs) 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Subbasin 15 Current Scenario 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 Annual daily peak discharge (cumecs) 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Subbasin 15 GHG Scenario 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 Number Number Annual daily peak discharge (cumecs) 6 5 4 3 2 1 Subbasin 21 Control Scenario 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 Annual daily peak discharge (cumecs) 6 5 4 3 2 1 Subbasin 21 GHG Scenario 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 Number Number
Events exceeding arbitrary thresholds in Mahanadi River Basin Discharge (cumecs) Control GHG Control GHG Mahanadi Subbasins Sub15 Sub15 Sub21 Sub21 Discharge>2 2 4 9 13 Discharge>3 1 7
Flow Duration Curve for Mahanadi River for Control and GHG scenarios The flow for all the dependable levels has increased for the GHG scenario over the corresponding Current flow magnitude For the 5% level of dependability, the flow has marginally reduced Flow (Cumecs) 1 1 1 1 1 1.1.1.1 Control GHG.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 % of time flow equal or exceeded Dependable Flow (cumecs) 25% 5% 75% 9% PRESENT 4716 126 15.9 1.468 FUTURE 613 1168 43.39 3.182
Annual mean water balance for Control and GHG climate scenarios in different river basins Trends in Waterbalance Components (Control and GHG Climate Scenarios) 18 16 14 12 Value (mm) 1 8 6 4 2 Cauvery Brahmani Godavari Krishna Luni Mahanadi Mahi Narmada Pennar Tapi Ganga Sabarmati Rain (Control) Rain (GHG) Runoff (Control) Runoff (GHG) A (Control) A (GHG)
Percent change in mean annual water balance for Control and GHG climate scenarios 4 2 Rainfall Runoff -2-4 -6-8 Mahanadi Brahmani Ganga Godavari Cauvery Narmada Tapi Krishna Pennar Mahi Luni Sabarmati River Basins Change from Current to GHG Scenario (%
Conclusions The study is the first step towards getting the realistic estimates of the possible climate change impacts across the country It has provided a framework to be used for integrated river basin planning and management which was missing so far There is lot of improvement that is desirable and is under process
Thank you